EPTI honestly think with the way blizzard has been going its probably gonna end up being a P2P online game.
What do you guys think and why.
Pay2Play SC2?
| Forum Index > Closed |
|
KodoU-
United States129 Posts
I honestly think with the way blizzard has been going its probably gonna end up being a P2P online game. What do you guys think and why. | ||
|
jtan
Sweden5891 Posts
define p2p please edit: ok now I saw the title I clicked  hmmm pretty sure it's free online blizzard would get hated and they get plenty of wow money anyway | ||
|
eekmice
United States373 Posts
| ||
|
Zironic
Sweden341 Posts
| ||
|
jtan
Sweden5891 Posts
| ||
|
decafchicken
United States20090 Posts
they already make several hundred thousand/million from WoW anyways per month. | ||
|
jtan
Sweden5891 Posts
| ||
|
dementus
Singapore1151 Posts
edit: ok fine, i confess. i'll break down and cry if it was pay to play. | ||
|
istealhotelsoap
United States514 Posts
| ||
vGl-CoW
Belgium8305 Posts
| ||
|
KodoU-
United States129 Posts
On May 20 2007 17:35 vGl-CoW wrote: hahaha are you insane is who insane? and i dont know, like i said if SC 2 ends up being P2P it could determine whether alot of people play it or not. but yes if we have to pay than "the blizz support would probably be better, and no hackers or bad patches" But i have come to the conclusion that Blizz doesnt really care about customers anymore and what they want or dont want. my example Diablo II they have a ladder season thats supposed to roll like every 6 months? its been around for almost 3 years and its rolled over once. Apparantly Blizzard is running low on its ability to give Customer satisfaction. | ||
|
.kaz
1963 Posts
On May 20 2007 17:28 jtan wrote: wow I just realized theres like 60 threads in the sc2 already! Hell, it's about time. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
LuMiX
China5757 Posts
| ||
|
vGl-CoW
Belgium8305 Posts
On May 20 2007 17:38 KodoU- wrote: is who insane? and i dont know, like i said if SC 2 ends up being P2P it could determine whether alot of people play it or not. but yes if we have to pay than "the blizz support would probably be better, and no hackers or bad patches" But i have come to the conclusion that Blizz doesnt really care about customers anymore and what they want or dont want. my example Diablo II they have a ladder season thats supposed to roll like every 6 months? its been around for almost 3 years and its rolled over once. Apparantly Blizzard is running low on its ability to give Customer satisfaction. Look, Starcraft has free Battle net, and back when it was new, it had an active ladder which was regularly cleaned up by Blizzard, and it'd still be receiving tons of support if it wasn't almost ten years old. There's no reason for Blizzard to not do the same for SC II. Besides, nobody charges monthly fees for anything that isn't an MMO game. It's not accepted and they would catch way too much flak for it. I always hate it when people say that Blizzard hates their users. You can't expect them to keep nursing an old game like SC or Diablo when they have newer and more important babies running around. And guess who the shiniest, newest baby is? Yeah, SC II. | ||
|
Zironic
Sweden341 Posts
| ||
|
Dariush
Romania330 Posts
| ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
Fen
Australia1848 Posts
Also, with wow your paying your monthly fee for a world that is interactive and can be played single player. In an RTS multiplayer environment you are relying on other players for your entertainment. Do you get a refund if your opponents are noobs? | ||
|
DrainX
Sweden3187 Posts
 ) Would be kind of cool if there was a rather cheap monthly fee though if most of it went to pricemoney in online tours and ladders | ||
| ||
