EPTMission Mini Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Vivax
22087 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22087 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22087 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22087 Posts
Templar's long post wasn't all that interesting, but I won't fault him for sharing thoughts. It will be important to see if he continues to share thoughts rather than making disconnected catch up posts. Also kita I want a followup to this now. Disconnected catch up post sounds like something you would scumread him for and I don't like how you willingly put a caveat in here. I wanna talk about templars post some more. | ||
|
Vivax
22087 Posts
On September 02 2014 10:53 kushm4sta wrote: yeah i dont like how batsnacks posted that random shit. really anti town to do that in a mission game. I don't put any weight into it whatsoever. | ||
|
Vivax
22087 Posts
On September 02 2014 10:56 kushm4sta wrote: yeah but that could satisfy a mission, which makes it fishy. I'm ignoring anything about missions cause until we have more information about them whatever we see as possible mission is tinfoil and I'm annoyed at how the game started with all that setup talk. What I don't ignore is possible scum, three people in particular caught my eye so far, can you guess at least one of them? | ||
|
Vivax
22087 Posts
 | ||
|
Vivax
22087 Posts
On September 02 2014 11:10 kitaman27 wrote: It would be a scum read if he does this repeatedly. It's too early to go after that for a single post. If he starts interacting with the thread, then I'm not as concerned. Who do you find worse, 3d12 or batsnack? 3d12 for his awkward entrance so far. I would like to discuss Templars post more though. Let's say you need to appear like contributing, that post is one thing I would see scum starting with. They go through the thread commenting on various issues (instead of just thinking them through and getting straight to the point of what they find scummy without having to list a load of posts), when they're done, they look at what they commented on and base their entire read narrative off it. That's exactly the feeling I got from Templar's post and the feeling I get from you is that you're trying to shove it under a carpet after feeling the same. | ||
|
Vivax
22087 Posts
On September 02 2014 11:12 Tehpoofter wrote: Why do you ask him for specifically three? am I missing some meta? Cause I have three suspects and I'm testing kush for congruence cause when we're town he's my bro. | ||
|
Vivax
22087 Posts
On September 02 2014 11:17 kushm4sta wrote: vivax there is no congruence. 3d is fine templar is not super scummy kita "pushing stuff under the rug"... okkkk nice conspiracy theory batsnacks needs some plynching. That's not the reason I even found kita suspicious initially. Me pushing that notion comes from the fact that I found him suspicious just for his entrance, so what you mention is a consequence and not a cause. | ||
|
Vivax
22087 Posts
On September 02 2014 11:23 kitaman27 wrote: So you're saying that I uncovered a scummy post from my scum buddy templar, pointed it out, and then decided to minimize the severity by "shoving it under a carpet"? meh I called the post a disconnected catchup post because it was. I shared my displeasure about those type of posts, decided that it's not significant enough to push right now, and pushed templar in the direction to not do it again. You didn't seem displeased, you gave us a reason for you to not pursue it further. If you were displeased I'd expect you to be more confrontational than that, where you give yourself a reason to ignore it. Why bring it up at all if it's of no relevance for you afterwards? That's what I also don't understand from a town pov. I'd expect you to mention things you find worthwhile mentioning and if you mention that but don't apply it at all to your templar read cause apparently it doesn't say enough for you then it just looks like an issue you would find scummy usually, but here you play it down. | ||
|
Vivax
22087 Posts
On September 02 2014 11:36 kushm4sta wrote: I don't think 3d is all that scummy considering he's new to forum mafia. It explains the awkward feels people are getting/ Nice! (no sarcasm) | ||
|
Vivax
22087 Posts
Why was kita just white and not pink if you didn't just disagree previously, instead found him suspicious according to your recent opinion? | ||
|
Vivax
22087 Posts
On September 02 2014 11:53 kushm4sta wrote: dude aren't you married to bunnies or some shit Did you ask her if she wants to be your gf yet. | ||
|
Vivax
22087 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22087 Posts
Such a dry answer. | ||
|
Vivax
22087 Posts
In my opinion it's just a buzzword related to a bad heuristic and I would appreciate if you didn't scumread people off so lazy reasons. There is literally no logic behind buddying=scum, if you could even call what I did like that, which is comparing my reads with people whose town play I value. | ||
|
Vivax
22087 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22087 Posts
We should change topics. So basically I have this feeling that kita and templar are scummies. | ||
|
Vivax
22087 Posts
On September 02 2014 12:11 Tehpoofter wrote: I think buddying is something mafia does often maybe not out right but its a valuable tactic to get town read by someone who has a lot of influence in town and ride that "x thought I was town" mantra until the end. So I disagree its a bad heuristic its something I look for always when I'm playing. The point is that buddying is a scum tactic a good one and I'm going to call it out if I see it happening. Yeah but townies buddy too, it's then called town circle and I don't see how you decide that I'm scum buddying over town buddying. | ||
| ||
