• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:35
CEST 18:35
KST 01:35
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview25Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL46Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator4[ASL19] Finals Preview: Daunting Task30
Community News
[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates6GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th12Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0EWC 2025 Regional Qualifier Results26Code S RO12 Results + RO8 Groups (2025 Season 2)3
StarCraft 2
General
Magnus Carlsen and Fabi review Clem's chess game. The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th
Tourneys
Bellum Gens Elite: Stara Zagora 2025 SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Cheeseadelphia 2025 - Open Bracket LAN! $25,000+ WardiTV 2025 Series Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance Mutation # 473 Cold is the Void
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans? BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates I made an ASL quiz
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 2 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 1 [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Mechabellum Monster Hunter Wilds
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0 Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Cognitive styles x game perf…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Poker
Nebuchad
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 20842 users

Normal Mini Mafia: Episode I

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
1 2 3 Next All
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 19 2014 05:35 GMT
#61
Hmmmmmmm. I'll guess I'll /in since it has been awhile.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 20 2014 00:07 GMT
#79
Hi guys. I've got a thought for you. What do you think of having all our Boxers claim right now? I think it limits scum's options. I mean we have a 50% chance of having more than 1 Boxer and we are almost guaranteed to have 1. It prevents shenannies by scum claiming later and scum would be put into a difficult position now by claiming. Thoughts?

P.S. Don't claim yet, Boxers. This only works if everybody agrees. No claim strategy should be done partway because that is always the worst option.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 20 2014 02:06 GMT
#127
On January 20 2014 10:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 10:01 VisceraEyes wrote:
On January 20 2014 09:55 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Nobody should claim at this point. Named VT's (boxers) do not help us in any way now because there is a possibility of 0-3 boxers and claiming does not clear anyone, it only gives mafia information about the setup unless we want all people to claim which we don't.

suki, kushmasta does not usually even read his own role PM properly (which is proven by last game for example) so unfortunately that plan does not make him non VT / non named VT and certainly not mafia.

Yeah I'm mostly indifferent to the matter. I can see the argument for it not being needed and it giving scum information, but I think it could help us in the future by 1) eliminating scum's ability to fake-claim it on the block and 2) forcing scum to decide now whether they want to fake-claim the role.

Here is the problem:
If the named VT's claim it gives mafia info about the setup.
  • If there are no named VT's -> mafia knows the setup and can WIFOM by fakeclaiming VT and it's impossible to prove if itäs true or not
  • If there is 1 naved VT -> If mafia has a GF they know the setup, if not, they know town has no more than 1 power role.
  • If there are 2 named VT's -> mafia knows there is only max 1 power role.
  • If there are 3 named VT's -> mafia knows there is no other power roles. they can WIFOM a roleblock on people and it "confirms" that's not the setup, so WIFOM.


Every single possible scenario only helps mafai and not town, so no, don't claim named VT's because they can't be confirmed and it only helps mafia if they know how many Named VT's there are.

Discussion closed.

I don't think it's quite that simple.

I don't care if there are no named VTs or 1 or 2 or 3. Yes scum will be learn things about the setup, but honestly that doesn't matter because scum already know that there are X to Y power roles from their configuration. What claiming now does is prevent scum from being able to fake claim a named VT later. It prevents stupid things happening at lynches. Additionally, if we have power roles it gives them info about where they should begin using their powers. Even if scum decide to fake claim now, it's not like we're giving the named VTs a free pass, we're just treating them like miller claims where the info helps us and prevents scum from claiming something like that (e.g. miller) in the future.

That's all. It all depends if you think it matters if scum knowing the setup is a bad thing or if the claims could even help our power roles. I'll let other people chime in on this.

Ok. Back to this crazy Niners-Seahawks game.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 20 2014 03:08 GMT
#139
On January 20 2014 11:09 thrawn2112 wrote:
When'd you start writing that Crossfire?

Idk. During some random 2 minute commercial break. I'll think about this issue more, but I gtg now, though. See you all tomorrow.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 04:00 GMT
#604
Sup I'm back. I think I agree with thrawn about kush. I remember hosting ## and reading the game and remembering how kush (as town) just bounced around all over the place saying this person was scum, that person was scum, no change all that they're town now, etc. I don't see any of that here.

town kush's filter in "##" Mafia as a smurf

Choice quotes from his filter that game (where he was town):

On October 30 2013 23:26 OOHCHILD wrote:
Reason why I nuked WoS:
It was a very impulsive move. I was just pissed that clarity had been lynched instead of him, since i had a pretty good townread on clarity. Should be pretty obvious by now but my scumread on WoS changes every second, from probs town to OMG SUCMMIEST PLAYER in the game as I weight the arguments in my head. Right now I could see him flipping either way. I tried to read through his filter last night but I didn't do it full and I wasn't fully present and I didn't make any good conclusions.

On October 30 2013 23:29 OOHCHILD wrote:
I was just really angry at him and I wanted to use my powers on someone so I figured eh why not him. Also my read of him changes a lot so I figured cant be that bad because he could be scum anyway.
Plus I dont know what it is about WoS but his attitude and everything about him pisses me off for some reason. NO offense WOS! It's me, not you.

On November 01 2013 16:18 OOHCHILD wrote:
you know im town when i start conspiracy theorizing





Hmmmm. After reading his filter more from here and ##, I don't know how sure I am of him being mafia, but I'll still post it because it's relevant. These posts by him from ## made me change my mind plus a gut town read I had on him based on the early game.

On October 31 2013 02:21 OOHCHILD wrote:
It's kind of lame that everyone wants to lynch me for shit I can't control.

And prome in my recent scum games I have not been bussing scum and defending townies. I really only ever did that in games with people who didn't know about it.

I remember there was this game where someone who knew about it came in as a replacement and I got fucked.

On October 31 2013 04:26 OOHCHILD wrote:
cant stay but wtf vayne
Show nested quote +
OOHCHILD - Now that I know it's kush this doesnt look like his recent townplay at all. He hasn't made any cases or deduced anything worth reading like has recently been the case, he has only been throwing suspicion on random people and then nuking completely different targets. His play is erratic and doesn't make sense. With that said, I don't think he would play this reckless as scum because in an experimental game it's just asking to get shot in the face in some way.

Why so wishy washy?
Also I have never played with even a shred of decency on d1 EVER.



TL;DR I'm conflicted on kush's play right now. thrawn brings up decent points about kush's meta, but also I trust what kush says about his own meta when playing as town. Time to go find someone else cause I'm not too sure about kush either way.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 04:10 GMT
#607
On January 21 2014 12:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I am pretty sure zarepath is mafia. About half of his stuff in his case on VE has happened before he makes these posts:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 21:44 zarepath wrote:
I thought VE was talking about the two different plans, kush's "don't lynch anyone who claims blue" plan and the Boxer claim plan. I don't know what he was talking about with the "2 is pretty potent" quote, I have no idea what he's saying. But I didn't think he was inconsistent while reading him because he had two different opinions on two different plans.

Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 21:48 zarepath wrote:
@Thrawn, VE's vote seemed premature to me because I didn't really see a super early blue claim as scummy, but not wholly unreasonable considering Wile WAS directly contradicting everything he had said earlier.

If he really thinks that stuff in his case is scummy i doubt he would defend VE against other people for the same stuff earlier on..

##unvote
##Vote: zarepath


I'll look into kush tomorrow in more detail. something does not add up in his scumslip finding.

I don't know if I agree with you. He says he is scummy because of all these things, not just 1 of these things. He even specifically says that his first point isn't scummy in and of itself.

On January 21 2014 03:46 zarepath wrote:
I am thinking VE is scummy based off of a few things:

1. Lots of early discussion about the two plans
+ Show Spoiler +
He talked a lot about the two plans and asked others about them, and said so many things about them that people were mixing up which plan he was talking about. Not necessarily scummy in and of itself, but a very easy topic to talk about if you don't actually want to start making reads on people


Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 04:12 GMT
#608
On January 21 2014 13:06 thrawn2112 wrote:
maaaaan that is an unhelpful post

crossfire your kush read is nothing but meta. a bigass post with nothing but meta and no conclusion. why on earth did you post that?

cause I did a bunch of work and didn't feel like posting nothing after reading about kush for however long i did. I also figured it would be helpful in case people wanted to see my thoughts on kush since he seemed to be a hot topic (well at least you constantly pushed him)
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 04:30 GMT
#613
I don't know if this is town rayn right now. He is basically throwing accusations at everyone and just trying to see which one sticks. First there's the one against me.

On January 20 2014 11:12 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Could lynch for that post.
+ Show Spoiler +
On January 21 2014 10:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:
##Vote: Crossfire99
I'll go back here until this guy says something.


He followed this with a vote on thrawn
On January 20 2014 10:42 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 10:22 thrawn2112 wrote:
yeah kush is right, pretty close to confirmed that one of kush or thrawn is scum

Well in that case:
##Vote: thrawn2112
There is nothing scummy in what kush has done so far.
+ Show Spoiler +
On January 21 2014 10:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Ugh.. Artanis is probably town after all. I kinda get his thought process but it's not good..
Artanis my vote on thrawn was not a joke. It was a serious vote, i do not joke vote.


Then the one against Wile (Slam)
On January 20 2014 12:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:
What the hell? How can scum hide? You just said a while ago you don't like kush's plan which means you don't take claims for granted. Who cares if someone claims named VT when most likely being lynched. It does not mean shit unless you can tell for sure their claim cannot be false which you can't.

If we have named VT's claim now we have 0-4 claims. In case we have 0 claims we learn the setup. If we have 1-3 claims we learn that there are 0-3 fakeclaims which in fact tells us absolutely nothing as you can't confirm anything. If we have 4 claims we learn that we have at least 1 scum in the claimed VT's, one fucking mafia in a group of four people, lol.

In every situation mafia learns how many power roles town has, possibly even the whole setup depending on the claim numbers and their roles.

Do i need to explain more why the claiming does ABSOLUTELY NOTHING GOOD TO THE TOWN AND ONLY HELPS MAFIA?!?!?!!?

VE - Crossfire - thesmurfdude / all those people look terrible.
VE + Crossfire for not realising something obvious while agreeing that we should not blindly trust claims
smurfdude for not reading the thread or if he has for making a useless post that does not contribute towards anything and asks an useless question that has been explained in thread already.

##unvote
##Vote: Wile E. Coyote

Next up is bum.
On January 20 2014 22:42 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 22:36 VisceraEyes wrote:
There isn't much to them. After reading through I can at least say that he weakly agrees that I look bad (though I don't know why) and he believes the boxer claim and he thinks other boxers should not claim.

I wouldn't mind some elaboration on his issue with me.


So here are bumatlarge's posts:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 17:32 bumatlarge wrote:
We'll, No one else should claim. One named VT doesn't actually tell us or the mafia anything. I have my doubts that Wile is lying unless he's being a very intentionally hard to understand smurf. "Chez" or no, it doesn't hurt that bad. Anyone voting for him for that reason is being awfully hasty.

green: believes claim
red: says claim is fake

which is it?

Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 18:23 bumatlarge wrote:
I'm assuming boxer means Named VT?

This is a question that has been answered twice in the thread already.
Useless "contribution" or not even reading the thread.

Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 18:29 bumatlarge wrote:
On January 20 2014 13:02 suki wrote:
On January 20 2014 09:27 VisceraEyes wrote:
It's dumb because of what rayn said - you're literally saying "Anyone who claims blue is immune to the lynch". Literally. What is stopping scum from just claiming blue whenever they're on the block?

On January 20 2014 10:01 VisceraEyes wrote:
Yeah I'm mostly indifferent to the matter. I can see the argument for it not being needed and it giving scum information, but I think it could help us in the future by 1) eliminating scum's ability to fake-claim it on the block and 2) forcing scum to decide now whether they want to fake-claim the role.

On January 20 2014 10:02 VisceraEyes wrote:
2 is pretty potent in my opinion. If you don't believe me, take a look at Kush's plan. He wants to make blues IMMUNE to the lynch.


So is kush's plan dumb? Or do you think it could help us in the future and there's a reason that's pretty potent? Or are you just indifferent to the whole matter?

On January 20 2014 11:26 VisceraEyes wrote:
It does NOT matter if scum figure out the setup before town does...in fact given the nature of this game that is pretty much a given. What DOES matter it's that we not tell them exactly what it is ON DAY ONE BEFORE WE GET ANY INFO OURSELVES, which is very possible if we have boxers claim.

Is it worth the risk? I'm starting to think not, but want other opinions.


Inconsistent views on kush's plan (he think's it's dumb / sees arguments for it / is mostly indifferent). Wishy-washy.

And I just hate the bolded red line in general.

##unvote
##vote VisceraEyes


The scum hunt is strong with this one. I'd like VE to explain his thought process on the first part, he seems to be changing his mind mid post, then it would make more sense as town.

Scum hunting is not strong with that one. The first part is entirely false and that's all he's talking about.

Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 18:33 bumatlarge wrote:
On January 20 2014 17:48 Wile E. Coyote wrote:
On January 20 2014 14:25 VisceraEyes wrote:
##Vote Wile E
His little act about not knowing what a boxer is does not really jive with the claim. Add to that the fact that he claimed 5 hours into the game after being very clear about how he feels about boxers claiming, and it all just looks bad.

This is a logical reaction.

I disagree, the only reason you think it's reasonable is because he is holding back because he probably wrong about you. I'm just working out what I can remember from VE if he posts like this as town.

Again implying the claim is true, and now he is not really suspicious of VE in the end.



TLDR;
Here's what bum's posts say this far
- Does believe the claim but does not believe the claim
- Says VE is scummy but VE is not necessarily scummy
- Asks a question that's been answered 2 times already.

##Vote: bumatlarge

Then kush
On January 21 2014 02:01 raynpelikoneet wrote:
##unvote
##Vote: kushm4sta

stop it already bum, i have no idea what you are trying to do or why you get angry for no reason at all. If i have one invalid point in my case that does not make other points invalid as you try to tell here.

I have no read on VE. If i had to give something i'd say scum but i dunno yet.

artanis has the next honor
On January 21 2014 04:20 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I kinda wanna lynch Artanis for his stupid ass case and unwillingness to do anything.

And now zarepeth.
On January 21 2014 12:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I am pretty sure zarepath is mafia. About half of his stuff in his case on VE has happened before he makes these posts:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 21:44 zarepath wrote:
I thought VE was talking about the two different plans, kush's "don't lynch anyone who claims blue" plan and the Boxer claim plan. I don't know what he was talking about with the "2 is pretty potent" quote, I have no idea what he's saying. But I didn't think he was inconsistent while reading him because he had two different opinions on two different plans.

Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 21:48 zarepath wrote:
@Thrawn, VE's vote seemed premature to me because I didn't really see a super early blue claim as scummy, but not wholly unreasonable considering Wile WAS directly contradicting everything he had said earlier.

If he really thinks that stuff in his case is scummy i doubt he would defend VE against other people for the same stuff earlier on..

##unvote
##Vote: zarepath


I'll look into kush tomorrow in more detail. something does not add up in his scumslip finding.

Remember this is only a little more than 24 hours into a game and he is already attacking and voting for this many people!? This screams just throwing out cases and hoping one sticks.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 21:31 GMT
#852
Hmmmm. I don't know what to make of zare's claim, but I'm thinking it doesn't matter. I defended him earlier about his case but after all the other things he's said and the other stuff people have pointed out about his case, I could still lynch him.

If the claim scares people off his lynch I'd be willing to vote Balla purely because of his "case" against me.
On January 21 2014 17:09 Balla24 wrote:
I don't like Crossfire at all.

His case on Rayn is super weird, where exactly does what rayn does make him scum? He's pressuring a lot of people with cases and votes. Crossfire is calling him scum for not committing to them and switching targets a lot but how does that make rayn scum?? It doesn't. It makes him town. From town perspective everybody starts as neutral and either gets a mafia read or a town read... its the opposite as scum.

Rayn builds cases on people he thinks are scum, and posts reasoning too, yet Crossfire just latches onto the action itself and NOT the reasoning of rayn's cases. Rayn is one of the most active people in this game, why does Crossfire feel the need to pressure rayn about something so weak?

Then there's this:

Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 11:06 Crossfire99 wrote:
On January 20 2014 10:11 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On January 20 2014 10:01 VisceraEyes wrote:
On January 20 2014 09:55 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Nobody should claim at this point. Named VT's (boxers) do not help us in any way now because there is a possibility of 0-3 boxers and claiming does not clear anyone, it only gives mafia information about the setup unless we want all people to claim which we don't.

suki, kushmasta does not usually even read his own role PM properly (which is proven by last game for example) so unfortunately that plan does not make him non VT / non named VT and certainly not mafia.

Yeah I'm mostly indifferent to the matter. I can see the argument for it not being needed and it giving scum information, but I think it could help us in the future by 1) eliminating scum's ability to fake-claim it on the block and 2) forcing scum to decide now whether they want to fake-claim the role.

Here is the problem:
If the named VT's claim it gives mafia info about the setup.
  • If there are no named VT's -> mafia knows the setup and can WIFOM by fakeclaiming VT and it's impossible to prove if itäs true or not
  • If there is 1 naved VT -> If mafia has a GF they know the setup, if not, they know town has no more than 1 power role.
  • If there are 2 named VT's -> mafia knows there is only max 1 power role.
  • If there are 3 named VT's -> mafia knows there is no other power roles. they can WIFOM a roleblock on people and it "confirms" that's not the setup, so WIFOM.


Every single possible scenario only helps mafai and not town, so no, don't claim named VT's because they can't be confirmed and it only helps mafia if they know how many Named VT's there are.

Discussion closed.

I don't think it's quite that simple.

I don't care if there are no named VTs or 1 or 2 or 3. Yes scum will be learn things about the setup, but honestly that doesn't matter because scum already know that there are X to Y power roles from their configuration. What claiming now does is prevent scum from being able to fake claim a named VT later. It prevents stupid things happening at lynches. Additionally, if we have power roles it gives them info about where they should begin using their powers. Even if scum decide to fake claim now, it's not like we're giving the named VTs a free pass, we're just treating them like miller claims where the info helps us and prevents scum from claiming something like that (e.g. miller) in the future.

That's all. It all depends if you think it matters if scum knowing the setup is a bad thing or if the claims could even help our power roles. I'll let other people chime in on this.

Ok. Back to this crazy Niners-Seahawks game.


Where rayn points out why claiming Boxers is a bad thing for town and a good thing for mafia. He essentially brushes that off by saying "mafia already knows information about the setup" without really explaining what. Rayn gives him the courtesy to write out his expected outcomes from the plan but Crossfire does not reciprocate.

##vote Crossfire99

His bolded section is just wrong. It's like he just stopped reading my post after the green section or is trying to purposely misconstrue what I'm saying because there is no reason to stop reading in the middle of the sentence. Especially since the very next sentence explains what the advantage (expected outcome) of my plan was, preventing scum from fakeclaiming before a lynch (*cough* zarepeth *coug*).

On January 22 2014 02:31 Balla24 wrote:
Past 2 days have been busier than normal. Can't refresh and spam conversations with people like I normally do which is unfortunate. It's looking a lot better moving forward though.

As far as Crossfire: His case against rayn is bad and really construed, its very large but the only thing he is attacking is the fact that rayn has jumped around a lot. Like it doesn't make sense to put that much effort into that first off, and secondly why does he feel the need to pressure rayn of all people who is active as hell and will be more readable because of it. It just feels very wrong. The second bit about the Boxers claiming thing is obvious that there is scum motivation for discussing it and getting the town onboard. So him brushing off what was said is super suspicious.

Other people who look bad: Jonnylaw, Artanis. Artanis's game plan is really weird and underwhelming to me. He comes in trying to hard read rayn, accuses him of being scum and then leaves. Not only did he only accuse you of being scum because he thinks you have "something to hide" but you had done so much already and now that there was more.

This quote where he restates his scum read on me also doesn't work. He's saying I shouldn't pressure rayn just because he's active. That's dumb. If you think someone could be scum, you don't just not pressure them because they're active. He also just assumes that my plan is purely scum motivated and didn't have a legitimate point which was what I said about the whole prevents scum from fake claiming.

Basically, Balla seems to purposely miscontrue what I'm saying and paint it in a scummy light instead of just actually reading what I'm saying.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 21:34 GMT
#856
I don't understand what just happened. I don't think he broke the rules at all. I've given fake claims to scum in my games and they can copy paste it. I think that rule refers to timestamps or jazz like that.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 21:41 GMT
#870
On January 22 2014 06:36 raynpelikoneet wrote:
No townie wants anyone modkilled especially when mafia has fakeclaims and it's easy to prove and i have asked the hosts about it already.

I assumed this as well about the fake claims. It's always been something that's been "standard" to me. You give mafia a role pm written by you to prevent that them from being caught on the specific phrasing of the pm. Apparently it's illegal to even post that though? I don't think that's right. I guess going strictly by the wording of the rule, what zare did was illegal, but I've seen other people do that in other games and not be modkilled for it because it was assumed people got fake claims. I don't know what to believe now.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 21:44 GMT
#877
What do people think about what I said about Balla?
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 21:49 GMT
#889
On January 22 2014 06:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Crossfire99 you're wrong. You never explained how you draw the "mafia already knows information about the setup" conclusion because it's incorrect.

Because they either have 2 goons or not. I figured it was obvious. They then can narrow things down based on that. 2 goons means 1 powerrole and 1-2 named VTs. If not, there's more spread for the options, but they still know things.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 21:54 GMT
#902
On January 22 2014 06:48 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Crossfire, I somewhat agree what you say about Balla but you look way worse because you just dropped your case on me for no reason. Your play all game has made no sense to me and i have no idea what are you going to achieve.

Eh, I don't know what I think about you, so I put you on the back burner because I feel stronger about others instead of you. No one seems to think you're scummy now, so I'll have to see what you look like later. Maybe I'm just too paranoid about how active you can be as scum because of ##, but I'm basically waiting to see what happens and reevaluating you then.
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 21:56 GMT
#909
On January 22 2014 06:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 22 2014 06:49 Crossfire99 wrote:
On January 22 2014 06:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Crossfire99 you're wrong. You never explained how you draw the "mafia already knows information about the setup" conclusion because it's incorrect.

Because they either have 2 goons or not. I figured it was obvious. They then can narrow things down based on that. 2 goons means 1 powerrole and 1-2 named VTs. If not, there's more spread for the options, but they still know things.

Yes that's true and i missed it in the first place. Why did you not just say that in the first place?

cause I thought is was obvious T_T and didn't realize it was an issue
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 21:58 GMT
#914
So interesting thought. If we believe all the named vt claims, we lynch kush. If not we lynch one of them because kush soft claimed a powerrole (or not a vt)
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 22:00 GMT
#920
On January 22 2014 06:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 22 2014 06:56 Crossfire99 wrote:
On January 22 2014 06:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On January 22 2014 06:49 Crossfire99 wrote:
On January 22 2014 06:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Crossfire99 you're wrong. You never explained how you draw the "mafia already knows information about the setup" conclusion because it's incorrect.

Because they either have 2 goons or not. I figured it was obvious. They then can narrow things down based on that. 2 goons means 1 powerrole and 1-2 named VTs. If not, there's more spread for the options, but they still know things.

Yes that's true and i missed it in the first place. Why did you not just say that in the first place?

cause I thought is was obvious T_T and didn't realize it was an issue

No i really looked it only from town role perspective, not from scum at all.

What do you think about kush?

gut feeling now is town, because of the accidental non vt claim and now I'm seeing the "wildness" and big swings in opinions on players I was seeing when he smurfed and was town in ## (which I though was really weird because i never played with him or observed a game with him in it).
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 22:02 GMT
#924
On January 22 2014 06:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 22 2014 06:58 Crossfire99 wrote:
So interesting thought. If we believe all the named vt claims, we lynch kush. If not we lynch one of them because kush soft claimed a powerrole (or not a vt)

Where did he do that?

I read this quote as him doing this. I assumed scum got fake claims and therefore know the structure of at least named vts and regular vts, so this made him town in my eyes, but then he didn't act like I expected him too so I got confused.
On January 20 2014 09:19 kushm4sta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 09:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I found it ironic that my "name" is Z-Boson, the dude who outed my scumteam by posting our scum QT in thread in one game.

\so you are claiming named vt lol

Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 22:07 GMT
#930
On January 22 2014 07:06 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 22 2014 07:02 Crossfire99 wrote:
On January 22 2014 06:58 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On January 22 2014 06:58 Crossfire99 wrote:
So interesting thought. If we believe all the named vt claims, we lynch kush. If not we lynch one of them because kush soft claimed a powerrole (or not a vt)

Where did he do that?

I read this quote as him doing this. I assumed scum got fake claims and therefore know the structure of at least named vts and regular vts, so this made him town in my eyes, but then he didn't act like I expected him too so I got confused.
On January 20 2014 09:19 kushm4sta wrote:
On January 20 2014 09:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I found it ironic that my "name" is Z-Boson, the dude who outed my scumteam by posting our scum QT in thread in one game.

\so you are claiming named vt lol


So what is your current read on Kush?

On January 22 2014 07:00 Crossfire99 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 22 2014 06:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On January 22 2014 06:56 Crossfire99 wrote:
On January 22 2014 06:52 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On January 22 2014 06:49 Crossfire99 wrote:
On January 22 2014 06:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Crossfire99 you're wrong. You never explained how you draw the "mafia already knows information about the setup" conclusion because it's incorrect.

Because they either have 2 goons or not. I figured it was obvious. They then can narrow things down based on that. 2 goons means 1 powerrole and 1-2 named VTs. If not, there's more spread for the options, but they still know things.

Yes that's true and i missed it in the first place. Why did you not just say that in the first place?

cause I thought is was obvious T_T and didn't realize it was an issue

No i really looked it only from town role perspective, not from scum at all.

What do you think about kush?

gut feeling now is town, because of the accidental non vt claim and now I'm seeing the "wildness" and big swings in opinions on players I was seeing when he smurfed and was town in ## (which I though was really weird because i never played with him or observed a game with him in it).

Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
January 21 2014 22:14 GMT
#943
kush are you a non vt role? now would be the time to claim. Even if you're a power role it means someone of you, thrawn, zare, or wile (slam) is lying.
1 2 3 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Bellum Gens Elite
10:00
Stara Zagora 2025 Day 3
ShoWTimE vs RyungLIVE!
SKillous vs Lambo
Bellum Gens Elite3700
ComeBackTV 1099
IndyStarCraft 298
Rex179
3DClanTV 175
TaKeTV 144
CosmosSc2 142
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Bellum Gens Elite3559
IndyStarCraft 311
Hui .280
Rex 181
CosmosSc2 138
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 32457
Shuttle 2210
EffOrt 1232
Hyuk 785
Mini 755
BeSt 563
Stork 329
ZerO 293
firebathero 258
TY 185
[ Show more ]
Snow 127
JYJ83
sSak 42
sorry 32
zelot 28
Yoon 27
Terrorterran 21
GoRush 13
Noble 7
ajuk12(nOOB) 6
Bonyth 2
Dota 2
XcaliburYe644
syndereN597
Counter-Strike
fl0m6776
olofmeister2781
pashabiceps396
flusha200
Foxcn187
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang0116
Mew2King107
Other Games
singsing2303
FrodaN1769
Beastyqt646
crisheroes451
Lowko287
ArmadaUGS194
Liquid`VortiX119
Trikslyr77
QueenE57
KnowMe30
ZerO(Twitch)14
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream7087
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream621
Other Games
BasetradeTV40
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• poizon28 31
• Kozan
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 40
• Michael_bg 6
• FirePhoenix4
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis4123
• Jankos3537
• TFBlade1132
Upcoming Events
BSL 2v2 ProLeague
2h 25m
Replay Cast
7h 25m
CranKy Ducklings
17h 25m
SC Evo League
19h 25m
Bellum Gens Elite
19h 55m
Fire Grow Cup
22h 25m
CSO Contender
1d
BSL: ProLeague
1d 1h
StRyKeR vs MadiNho
Cross vs UltrA
TT1 vs JDConan
Bonyth vs Sziky
Replay Cast
1d 7h
SOOP Global
1d 10h
Creator vs Rogue
Cure vs Classic
[ Show More ]
SOOP
1d 16h
Classic vs GuMiho
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 17h
AllThingsProtoss
1d 18h
Fire Grow Cup
1d 22h
BSL: ProLeague
2 days
HBO vs Doodle
spx vs Tech
DragOn vs Hawk
Dewalt vs TerrOr
Replay Cast
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
GSL Code S
4 days
Rogue vs GuMiho
Maru vs Solar
Replay Cast
5 days
GSL Code S
5 days
herO vs TBD
Classic vs TBD
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
GSL Code S
6 days
WardiTV Invitational
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 1
DreamHack Dallas 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
2025 GSL S2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.