|
On July 06 2013 06:36 StiMaDDict wrote:Also I'll be all fired until the game start, then disappear? Nahh, I'll try to be more active this time. + Show Spoiler +Don't expect much though. XD
*glares super hard* *like intensely hard*
/obs
|
On July 06 2013 08:54 StiMaDDict wrote: I hope Alakslam and Umasi play in this one. Now that would be interesting XD
I'm on vacation atm, I might /in if the game still needs players and I'm at home
|
egh might as well give another game a shot /unobs /in
|
As long as you don't immediately bail! haha
|
Also~Dream team scum team is alakaslam, rainbows, I.
|
|
Rainbows StiM Nightcat99 scumteam, already making excuses for lurking
|
oh shit xzavs playing k I'm on board with the xzav wagon gogogoogogogogogoogo
|
think of the term bandwagoning in sports, where lots of people hop on and off at the drop of a hat. "on and off" in this case is voting to lynch or not.
|
all you have to do is maintain insane activity levels. otherwise I'll lynch you on meta
|
|
On July 13 2013 08:33 Superfluous wrote: While I agree that we should lynch someone if they are super scummy, I'd like to point out that voting for no lynch is an option. Assuming I'm interpreting the rules/setup right, mafia only has 1 kp so there's no immediate motive for lynching such as reducing kp. It may be a stronger play to not lynch and hope that cop(if there is one) gets a turn to check before lynch. It is a risk though because I believe we are not guaranteed to have a cop. Just an idea I wanted to throw out and get your guys' thoughts on.
My personal opinion is that no lynches are stupid, because the situation would only get worse (a nightkill occuring) Nothing interesting and new is going to come up from a no lynch, because the only result for town is more time to read/post/talk/whatever but we can just spend more time on the game if we want more time to analyze. No lynching throws away the tool the town uses to root out scum. Heck, rereading that post, you agree with the consensus, and then just talk about nothing. That entire post was, I daresay...superfluous.
(I thought the game began at six not four)
|
On July 13 2013 08:33 Chromatically wrote:Show nested quote +On July 13 2013 08:03 Hurricane Sponge wrote:
The following was written on the contingency I got Town in my role PM. I generally don't like early Day 1 town conversations because it's 100% fluff and teasing and clouds the filters. Necessary evil? Perhaps. But let's try to kick this game into overdrive early, shall we?
Why did you include this? Are you saying you wouldn't have posted this if you were scum? Show nested quote +On July 13 2013 08:20 Rainbows wrote:On July 13 2013 08:07 StiMaDDict wrote: I can only look at jrkirby's post as a pressure vote at this point. He didn't seem to be the type to joke around from the pre game though.
This post is scummy. Gives a reason for jkirbys post and then casts doubt on it. U scum? I'd be very interested in hearing your explanation as to why you honestly think this is scummy.
I certainly wouldn't post that if I were scum, it is nothing but a good thing for town. Why WOULD he want to post that as scum?
|
On July 13 2013 08:40 hzflank wrote:Show nested quote +On July 13 2013 08:33 Superfluous wrote: While I agree that we should lynch someone if they are super scummy, I'd like to point out that voting for no lynch is an option. Assuming I'm interpreting the rules/setup right, mafia only has 1 kp so there's no immediate motive for lynching such as reducing kp. It may be a stronger play to not lynch and hope that cop(if there is one) gets a turn to check before lynch. It is a risk though because I believe we are not guaranteed to have a cop. Just an idea I wanted to throw out and get your guys' thoughts on. How does the cop inform the town without letting the scum know that he is the cop?
That's not even specific to this no lynch strategy, or whatever how will the cop EVER let town know the result without revealing he's a cop? (I certainly have no fucking clue)
|
yeah, but rainbows there's a problem with that scum don't want to spew pro town crap, that's uh PRO TOWN
|
Superfluous, please keep talking about stuff, that single post left an extremely shitty taste in my mouth I want to get a more solid read on you. That single entrance screams scum to me though
|
Guys, arguing about the way he posted that is totally irrelevant. I got a town read from it, because it was solid shit. But nitpicking at it is not too relevant. Specifically what Jrkirby said:
On July 13 2013 08:46 jrkirby wrote:Show nested quote +On July 13 2013 08:42 Hurricane Sponge wrote:On July 13 2013 08:33 Chromatically wrote:On July 13 2013 08:03 Hurricane Sponge wrote:
The following was written on the contingency I got Town in my role PM. I generally don't like early Day 1 town conversations because it's 100% fluff and teasing and clouds the filters. Necessary evil? Perhaps. But let's try to kick this game into overdrive early, shall we?
Why did you include this? Are you saying you wouldn't have posted this if you were scum? Correct. I would not have posted this particular post as scum. But you might have posted another post starting with the same line. Or maybe you did post that as scum. But you certainly would never have said: The following was written on the contingency I got Scum in my role PM.
Of course he wouldn't say it, that'd be retarded. Why are you even bringing it up?
|
He didn't even necessarily MAKE ONE jesus what are you even talking about kirby
|
##VOTE SUPERFLUOUS
Where the hell are you. You popped in, gave a single post, that I think is scummy as crap, still haven't show back up. Pretty confusing, because the post you gave was irrelevant.
|
Kirby, I disagree. Scum has more than one goal in a game, believe it or not. It's not just to build towncred, otherwise being scum would be easy. (imo) Since all you'd have to do is be like me in the past game and post so fucking much and so irrationally that you won't get lynched
|
|
|
|