• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:48
CEST 14:48
KST 21:48
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week2[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation14$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced6Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL67
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Season 1 - Final Week Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation TL Team Map Contest #4: Winners Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL [G] Progamer Settings ASL20 Preliminary Maps
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Positive Thoughts on Setting Up a Dual-Caliber FX
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 688 users

[D] Swarm Host Redundant?

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 29 30 31 Next All
Gfire
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1699 Posts
October 24 2011 14:40 GMT
#1
Introduction

I want to talk a little bit about the new unit they've shown for Heart of the Swarm, the Swarm Host.



This is the Swarm Host in action.

It's supposed to be the burrowed unit with an attack that we all wanted. I think this is great, but there are some things about it that concern me just a little.

+ Show Spoiler [Redundancy] +

It seems to me like the Swarm host is too much like other Zerg units. People have mentioned the Brood Lord. I think to some extent, the Brood Lord is pretty close to this in concept, but I thought of another unit: The Infestor.

The Infestor can burrow and launch Infested Terrans. Infested Terrans are a timed life unit, like the Locusts the Swarm Host launches.

The player can choose where to launch the Infested Terran as well, giving more control over it. You have the ability to launch one over a cliff or a building, whereas the Swarm Host will only be useful in an open area, because the Locusts (I assume) have to walk around everything.

You also get more control because you can choose when to build them and how many. The energy cost allows you to store up many and launch them all at once, or you can choose to use just enough to take out a dropship or something.

The Infested Terrans have a ranged attack so they can hit air as well as other units at a distance.

In addition, the Infestor can move while burrowed.

And we can't forget, the Infestor can unburrow and use some other very strong spells as well.

All in all, I think the Infestor just has much more utility as well as being able to do everything the Swarm Host does. It's not a very effective use of Infestor energy, so we don't see it in play.

So it's not like the two units (as well as the Brood Lord) can't exist side by side, because they can be used for different things, but I think it would be even better to change the attack of the Swarm Host in some way to make it less like the other units. More diversity would be more fun and interesting, good from a spectator perspective, etc.



+ Show Spoiler [Damage Output] +

I would say they're having a hard time balancing this unit between "Free Units = Too Strong" and "Low Damage Output=Too Weak."

I think this concept of throwing free units at the opponent works better on the Hive Tech units (Brood Lords,) because they can get away with having some ridiculous damage output as well.

With such long recharge time and low damage output, I don't really get the "swarm" feel I should. Dustin Browder says "Slow, methodical grind" but that doesn't seem to be consistent with "swarm" to me.

Obviously they will be adjusting all the numbers for balance, but I think adjusting it in a more extreme way, not just basic numbers, would be good.

I'm wondering if Locusts move faster on creep. Broodlings don't, but they hover off the ground. These guys look like they walk, so I would guess they do move faster on creep. That would be very interesting, it would make them stronger at defending than attacking.


+ Show Spoiler [My Idea] +

I don't want to go into a lot of detail about the idea I had. It's just a way I thought in might make it better. Blizzard says they're open to suggestions, so since I did think of this, I guess I will post it on the bnet forums. I thought I'd share it here as well to see what everyone thought.

With the removal of the carrier, maybe it could be a little more carrier-like. The Locusts could be more locust-like, something like a melee Interceptor I guess.

They could fly out and stay until dying or the Swarm Host unburrows, and they could be replaces by an autospell like on the Carrier.

They should of course have a different flight pattern than interceptors, something less geometric, more swarm-like.

I guess there would be a maximum of 6, which is I think the number of holes on the back of the Swarm Host.

Whether or not you'd pay for them would depend. They could be free, and this would line up with the current Swarm Host (probably a good idea,) as well as make it less like the carrier. This is a lower tier unit, as well, and having them for free makes more sense. On the other hand, getting to dump some minerals here, where there is no larva cost, could be helpful. I'd probably make them stay free, though.
all's fair in love and melodies
Elite__
Profile Joined February 2011
Canada976 Posts
October 24 2011 14:44 GMT
#2
the broodlord and infestor are probably the two zerg units i like the most to use because they are fun, so i wouldn't mind having another unit that works in a similar way but has a different utility
ALPINA
Profile Joined May 2010
3791 Posts
October 24 2011 14:48 GMT
#3
I'ts not same role as infestor. You come near opponent base and burrow in range few of them and they will attack non-stop all the time forcing opponent to do something about it. But yeah there are little similarities.
You should never underestimate the predictability of stupidity
ProxyKnoxy
Profile Joined April 2011
United Kingdom2576 Posts
October 24 2011 14:50 GMT
#4
Imagine Swarm host/infestor/brood lord.... *shivers*
"Zealot try give mariners high five. Mariners not like high five and try hide and shoot zealot"
gruff
Profile Joined September 2010
Sweden2276 Posts
October 24 2011 14:50 GMT
#5
I haven't really payed attention, are the swarm host cloaked while burrowed? In the clip it looks like their backs are sticking up through the ground.
jeeeeohn
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
United States1343 Posts
October 24 2011 14:51 GMT
#6
I don't think the Swarm Host is redundant, but I do agree that it doesn't feel swarmy in the slightest. Big clunky units that shoot out glorified broodlings once every 15 seconds? How worthless. A Terran will wait for them to expire, scan, then stim, then destroy them. Tada, dead Swarm Hosts. I can see their defensive potential, or maybe nydus/drop harass, but as a siege unit it's pretty terrible.
If you can't jam with the best, then you have to slam with the rest.
goodpoltergeist
Profile Joined February 2011
United States41 Posts
October 24 2011 14:54 GMT
#7
To me they just launch the locusts way too slow. That terran could easily just move the tanks forward a little bit and scan to eliminate the swarm hosts. The terran has plenty of time in between volleys to get up there and deal with them.
nam nam
Profile Joined June 2010
Sweden4672 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-24 14:56:00
October 24 2011 14:55 GMT
#8
On October 24 2011 23:51 jeeeeohn wrote:
I don't think the Swarm Host is redundant, but I do agree that it doesn't feel swarmy in the slightest. Big clunky units that shoot out glorified broodlings once every 15 seconds? How worthless. A Terran will wait for them to expire, scan, then stim, then destroy them. Tada, dead Swarm Hosts. I can see their defensive potential, or maybe nydus/drop harass, but as a siege unit it's pretty terrible.


I don't see them being that useful on their own like in the video but with a few units behind or maybe a couple of infestors for fungal that seems pretty scary to me.
solidbebe
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Netherlands4921 Posts
October 24 2011 14:55 GMT
#9
I like your idea more honestly, every 15 seconds is just useless, eventhough they do alot of damage.
That's the 2nd time in a week I've seen someone sig a quote from this GD and I have never witnessed a sig quote happen in my TL history ever before. -Najda
Meteora.GB
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Canada2479 Posts
October 24 2011 14:56 GMT
#10
Screw the Swarm Host, give me back my Lurkers.
icezar
Profile Joined June 2010
Germany240 Posts
October 24 2011 14:56 GMT
#11
i do not see any use for that unit. In that video there are 9 swarm hosts so 27 supply and 1800 minerals/ 900 gas. From what i see the damage is done more from the splash of the siege.
Assirra
Profile Joined August 2010
Belgium4169 Posts
October 24 2011 14:57 GMT
#12
On October 24 2011 23:54 Monomate wrote:
To me they just launch the locusts way too slow. That terran could easily just move the tanks forward a little bit and scan to eliminate the swarm hosts. The terran has plenty of time in between volleys to get up there and deal with them.

That is what i am afraid for as well.
From the sounds it looked like the siege unit the zerg needed in mid game but it seems it will be used for something else since the dam worms are simply to slow, not to mention the range.
Panzamelano
Profile Joined September 2010
Colombia248 Posts
October 24 2011 14:57 GMT
#13
To be honest the "slow" spawn rate can be fixed by mannually burrowing your swarmhosts in groups of 2-3 instead of just burrowing them at the same time... giving you a steady line of locusts to attack.

and no... zerg doesnt need a carrier... the carrier was bad for 2 reasons.

1.incredibly hight tech cost.

2. took too long to get to it.


but on the other hand the swarm host takes way less time and costs way less so making it like a carrier attack wise would really just end up making zerg too much of a problem mid/late game (even more now that they have the vyper :X)
Jojo131
Profile Joined January 2011
Brazil1631 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-24 15:02:23
October 24 2011 14:58 GMT
#14
I dont really like it so far, particularly because I thought it'd spit out broodlings which travel faster. It doesn't seem like something I could put up on a ramp to defend a choke either, since they'd have to circle around and walk down the ramp themselves which was what I was hoping for in this unit, particularly the idea of shooting locusts off of a cliff and onto the approaching terran army, making tanks hit some of the marines and stuff.

Can't have it all I suppose but so far, unless these guys are somehow practical to mass up early, they dont seem very fun or interesting.

From the limited creativity my mind can muster, this doesn't really provide map control so much as a contain like in the video. Would like to see some pros try out different positioning to serve other roles though.
Callynn
Profile Joined December 2010
Netherlands917 Posts
October 24 2011 14:58 GMT
#15
Reasons I think you are wrong about saying the SH is the same as the Infestor and / or the Brood Lord:

- The Infestor uses energy to create those Infested Terrans, which is a tactical choice as opposed to using Fungal Growth or Neural Parasite.
- Infested Terrans can shoot into the air, Swarm Hosts can't.
- Swarm Hosts can lock a position down without costing the player APM, the Infestor can only lock down a position for as long as it's energy lasts and costs the player APM.
- Swarm Hosts are one Tier below the Brood Lord and countered in a completely different way.
- Brood Lords are meant to be the end-game siege unit needed to break overly excessive defenses (of, for example Bronze players making 20 cannons), contradictionary the Swarm Host is designed to fight for board control in a different stage of the game (mid-game).

I do feel there can be some tweaking going on surrounding the Swarm Host's attack. Either make it a bit faster and weaker, or make it faster and stronger and make the Locusts cost a bit of minerals (but this will piss off all those Protoss Reaver lovers).
Comparing BW with SCII is like comparing a beautiful three-master sailing ship with a modern battlecruiser. Both are beautiful in their own way, both perform the same task, but they are worlds apart in how they are built and how they are steered.
Hassybaby
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United Kingdom10823 Posts
October 24 2011 14:58 GMT
#16
Its a weird unit. Does anyone know how long the locust lasts? Because they have a decent amount of hp, so they can tank pretty damn well, which makes up for the time between spawns. Maybe reduce the hp, but increase the spawn rate?

Also, why are people assuming that you'll just send a Swarm Lord in its own towards a base? Do people do that with siege tanks? Or do they have support for the unit, like Zerg players will do with this new unit. They'll have lings/roaches/whatever to support it (at least they should do)
"These guys are mindfucking me into a sex coma" | "Mayonnaise is a must-have lubricant when performing necrophilia"
Egyptian_Head
Profile Joined October 2010
South Africa508 Posts
October 24 2011 14:58 GMT
#17
On October 24 2011 23:51 jeeeeohn wrote:
I don't think the Swarm Host is redundant, but I do agree that it doesn't feel swarmy in the slightest. Big clunky units that shoot out glorified broodlings once every 15 seconds? How worthless. A Terran will wait for them to expire, scan, then stim, then destroy them. Tada, dead Swarm Hosts. I can see their defensive potential, or maybe nydus/drop harass, but as a siege unit it's pretty terrible.

Get a couple banelings maybe? Its not like you will only have spawn host.
Velr
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
Switzerland10688 Posts
October 24 2011 14:59 GMT
#18
I somehow can't see a reason to every build one of these... Or think of a situation where i'm like "yeah... swarm hosts would solve that"...
Comprissent
Profile Joined September 2010
United States314 Posts
October 24 2011 15:00 GMT
#19
I think most of the redundancy is that these locusts aren't projectiles...
Sieging an enemy is useless if they can shoot down these siege 'projectiles'. All it does is add a few more units to an attack, where you lose the food from these hosts in an attack. In order to actually give some map presence, these attacks need to be projectiles that can't be shot down (like tanks/broodlords)
He's French-Canadian, so he's gonna do fast expand into stupid zealot timing into something else gay
T0fuuu
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Australia2275 Posts
October 24 2011 15:05 GMT
#20
It looks too phallic even for the race with spine crawlers spore crawlers and nydus.

I still think the lurker is better. Broodlords are good cos they do range damage and bug out the ai and lurkers impale things but swarm hosts just make suicide melee units.
1 2 3 4 5 29 30 31 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 12m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Tasteless 841
IndyStarCraft 182
Lowko173
Rex 133
SC2Nice 7
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 29338
Sea 27274
Rain 7139
Bisu 2867
Jaedong 1735
Hyuk 807
Light 620
Pusan 582
firebathero 480
Mini 442
[ Show more ]
actioN 345
Stork 290
Zeus 284
EffOrt 283
Backho 154
Hyun 146
ToSsGirL 128
Soulkey 106
Snow 81
Mind 64
hero 57
Shinee 48
sas.Sziky 40
JYJ38
JulyZerg 30
Aegong 29
sSak 28
Sea.KH 28
Rush 27
Sharp 21
Icarus 19
sorry 19
Sacsri 15
yabsab 15
Movie 13
ajuk12(nOOB) 12
IntoTheRainbow 11
Free 11
Noble 11
SilentControl 7
ivOry 5
Hm[arnc] 4
Dota 2
Gorgc8360
XaKoH 498
XcaliburYe293
syndereN135
League of Legends
singsing1976
Counter-Strike
x6flipin653
flusha304
allub284
markeloff73
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor162
Other Games
tarik_tv25536
B2W.Neo1272
shahzam656
crisheroes594
DeMusliM559
Fuzer 286
Liquid`RaSZi162
RotterdaM155
Pyrionflax151
QueenE27
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick30409
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 11
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1417
League of Legends
• Nemesis3325
Upcoming Events
OSC
12m
Replay Cast
11h 12m
RSL Revival
21h 12m
Classic vs Cure
FEL
1d 3h
OSC
1d 7h
RSL Revival
1d 21h
SHIN vs Clem
FEL
1d 23h
FEL
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.