• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 01:59
CET 07:59
KST 15:59
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview11Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info3herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational14SC2 All-Star Invitational: Tournament Preview5RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jan 19-25): Bunny, Trigger, MaxPax win3Weekly Cups (Jan 12-18): herO, MaxPax, Solar win0BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion8Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets4$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7)39
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft 2 Not at the Esports World Cup 2026 HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview Weekly Cups (Jan 19-25): Bunny, Trigger, MaxPax win Oliveira Would Have Returned If EWC Continued herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational
Tourneys
HomeStory Cup 28 $21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7) KSL Week 85 OSC Season 13 World Championship $70 Prize Pool Ladder Legends Academy Weekly Open!
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[A] Starcraft Sound Mod
External Content
Mutation # 511 Temple of Rebirth The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 510 Safety Violation Mutation # 509 Doomsday Report
Brood War
General
Can someone share very abbreviated BW cliffnotes? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Liquipedia.net NEEDS editors for Brood War BW General Discussion [ASL21] Potential Map Candidates
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 Azhi's Colosseum - Season 2 [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10
Strategy
Zealot bombing is no longer popular? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Current Meta Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Mobile Legends: Bang Bang Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Let's Get Creative–Video Gam…
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2153 users

[D] Swarm Host Redundant? - Page 5

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 29 30 31 Next All
Billd
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada210 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-24 16:14:46
October 24 2011 16:12 GMT
#81
I think it is important to remember that, in the video, the SH is by itself. People are mentioning that a pack of marines could scan and stim to kill it but I can't help but imagine having an infestor there waiting to fungal the pack of marines and lings to run out and surround them, killing the marines allowing the SH to continue its assault.

Still though, I'm not as excited about this unit as I am for the other zerg changes. I was excited when I heard we were getting a siege type unit and I honestly thought it was going to be something that shot a projectile that exploded on impact for splash damage, but I guess that is too similar to the siege tank. Edit: Exactly like the siege tank
@BilldSC I tweet about all things Starcraft 2!
genius_man16
Profile Joined February 2011
United States749 Posts
October 24 2011 16:16 GMT
#82
I have a feeling by the end of the beta the swarm host will release more locusts faster that are a lot weaker.

As it is now 15-18 seconds (whichever i don't remember) is FAAAAAAAAR too long between bursts.
Dyrus | Vooby | Balls | Meteos | WildTurtle | Bjergsen | Cop | sexPeke | Xpecial | Aphromoo | Scarra |
ProxyKnoxy
Profile Joined April 2011
United Kingdom2576 Posts
October 24 2011 16:16 GMT
#83
I think it could be strong indirectly as it might force the Terran to unseige? They have a lot of hp so if you have a lot of them you can probably win engagements
"Zealot try give mariners high five. Mariners not like high five and try hide and shoot zealot"
BeeNu
Profile Joined June 2011
615 Posts
October 24 2011 16:16 GMT
#84
Imagine if the Locusts exploded upon death much like that of a Baneling.

Yeeeeeeeaaaaaah, that'd do the trick.
ch4ppi
Profile Joined July 2010
Germany802 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-24 16:20:48
October 24 2011 16:18 GMT
#85
I think u are right with half the things u say.
Redundancy:
I agree with the the redundancy with the Broodlord. Both units to basicly the same, but the Broodlord is better at it, though it is more expensive. The Swarmhost seems to be a cheaper Broodloard, while cheap doesnt really describe him properly.
I think the comparsion between Infested marines and the locusts is just plain unlogic, because there is no energycost on the locusts. This changes the dynamic between the spells completly!

Damage Output:
Here I'm completly with you.

To your idea:
Yeah mb this is not bad...
I hate to bring this, but a more direct attack like the lurker would fit in the game much more. If the damage of that burrowed unit does take to much time it will be to easy to kill it. Compare them with Siege Tanks. What would you think of a siege tank that does the same DPS, but the damage would be dealed constantly. It would be much easier to kill it imo. Thats the same think Im afraid of with the swarm host.
It doesnt have to be THE Lurker attack, but there needs to be a more direct instantaneous dmg to make up for a longer setup time

What do u guys think?

btw. Imagine in this video there wouldnt be seiegetanks killing themselves, but a marine/Marauader ball with medivacs. Im fairly certain, that nothing would die.
Diversify
Profile Joined June 2010
Canada30 Posts
October 24 2011 16:18 GMT
#86
Personally, I think they should shoot out mini banelings or something similar. But with lowered damage of course and maybe would have a speed upgrade like the baneling or make the baneling and the mini baneling have the same upgrade.

It would be nice to see this unit have a slightly smaller radius and do about 5 damage per explosion.
Greth
Profile Blog Joined November 2007
Belgium318 Posts
October 24 2011 16:22 GMT
#87
One thing that would make this unit equal to the lurker and keep the clunky mechanic it has now is to keep the locust burrowed until they reach their rally point destination.
To make it work they can give them a HP reduction - right now they have 80 hp.

The splash idea only works for tanks and banelings. And it mostly relies on your opponent having no micro. 2 locust per Swarm host is just too little, relying on dedicating most of your army to it. Ramming 20 lings into a wall with dark swarm will be a lot better.

Then again ... Maybe the locust will be better with the new dark swarm too.
http://youtube.com/grethsc
HolydaKing
Profile Joined February 2010
21254 Posts
October 24 2011 16:24 GMT
#88
when i first saw it i thought: "awesome"

now... well to be honest it doesn't look that good. and i agree it shoots way too slow. i hardly see much potential for them.

time will tell, right now it seems worse than for example a lurker would've been but i don't think we even need lurkers, as banelings are so good (burrow movement seems imba).

still i fail to see many people using them, although i wonder how good agressive zerg builds with them as a siege unit would be... though i don't think too good.
zarepath
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States1626 Posts
October 24 2011 16:24 GMT
#89
Can we stop calling it the new Dark Swarm and just call it the new Disruption Web? Because that actually makes a lot more sense.
"Your efforts you put in will never betray you." - Flash | "If I'm not good enough, I don't wanna win." - Naniwa
Olsson
Profile Joined April 2011
Sweden931 Posts
October 24 2011 16:25 GMT
#90
This unit is just a retarded re-design of the lurker. Just give us the damn lurker this is just an immobile brood lord that won't hold areas. I agree with the OP.
Naniwa <3
HowardRoark
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
1146 Posts
October 24 2011 16:26 GMT
#91
Some questions:

1. If you just put a SH in the middle of nowhere, will it keep spawning a Locust that just hang around till the timer goes out? And if it just stay there, will you have to select and move the Locusts yourself to attack if you burrow one outside the enemy base?

2. I might have lived under a rock, but how do you access it? Does it evolve from Hydra? Or stand alone Infestation tech?
"It is really good to get the double observatory if you want to get the speed and sight range for the observer simultaneously. It's a little bit of an advanced tactic, and by advanced, I mean really fucking bad."
Stropheum
Profile Joined January 2010
United States1124 Posts
October 24 2011 16:27 GMT
#92
The difference is, the swarm host is burrowed, has a persistent presence, and i believe is armored, as in the demo video they shrug off a tank shot easily enough.

This doesn't apply to the infestor because all of its spells are relatively expensive, and you have to pick and choose your engagements. Same with broodlords, but instead of energy, you have opportunity cost. You pay a lot of money and tech into these units that supplement your army, but without support, they can fall extremely easily.

The swarm host's presence is much more persistent, and can hold down locations much better. It'll be very hard to run 8 marines up a ramp blocked by swarm hosts and spines, conversely doing such things with broodlords or infestors are first of all very expensive, and in many scenarios they might have just served a better purpose as part of your army.

I personally would never make a broodlord and hold position it over a ramp to my expansion for the entirety of a game, but I would definitely do this with swarm hosts. This was a common tactic in brood war and It'll make the game much more interesting in my opinion
HolydaKing
Profile Joined February 2010
21254 Posts
October 24 2011 16:29 GMT
#93
On October 25 2011 01:27 Stropheum wrote:
The difference is, the swarm host is burrowed, has a persistent presence, and i believe is armored, as in the demo video they shrug off a tank shot easily enough.

This doesn't apply to the infestor because all of its spells are relatively expensive, and you have to pick and choose your engagements. Same with broodlords, but instead of energy, you have opportunity cost. You pay a lot of money and tech into these units that supplement your army, but without support, they can fall extremely easily.

The swarm host's presence is much more persistent, and can hold down locations much better. It'll be very hard to run 8 marines up a ramp blocked by swarm hosts and spines, conversely doing such things with broodlords or infestors are first of all very expensive, and in many scenarios they might have just served a better purpose as part of your army.

I personally would never make a broodlord and hold position it over a ramp to my expansion for the entirety of a game, but I would definitely do this with swarm hosts. This was a common tactic in brood war and It'll make the game much more interesting in my opinion

Haven't thought about that, as in blocking the ramp entry... but to be honest we hardly ever see marines running up a ramp ^^ They usually come by drop because the zerg has mapcontrol most of the time. Except they might be handy to defend hidden expansions for some time.
Deletrious
Profile Joined December 2007
United States458 Posts
October 24 2011 16:32 GMT
#94
I think it's very intentional that zerg have a few units that create units that require no food. I wouldn't call that redundant, swarm host is much faster to get than brood lord. I think the whole point is that you can hope to break a siege tank defense before 3rd tier.
The little dudes released remind me of zealots, soaking up a good amount of damage so the rest of your army can run in without losing half you numbers to tank splash.
And if your army doesn't quite break through, the next round of swarm host continue to do damage as your new zerglings arrive. It's very much an endless wave of zerg units.
Bow before the Dongjwa.
ch4ppi
Profile Joined July 2010
Germany802 Posts
October 24 2011 16:34 GMT
#95
On October 25 2011 01:27 Stropheum wrote:
I personally would never make a broodlord and hold position it over a ramp to my expansion for the entirety of a game, but I would definitely do this with swarm hosts. This was a common tactic in brood war and It'll make the game much more interesting in my opinion


Yes it was common with Lurkers....
But this is no Lurker. 8 Marine drops rofl-stomp a single or maybe two SwarmHosts very hard. I dont even believe the Locusts will outdmg the medivac heal
Sueco
Profile Joined September 2009
Sweden283 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-24 16:39:03
October 24 2011 16:37 GMT
#96
On October 25 2011 01:27 Stropheum wrote:
The difference is, the swarm host is burrowed, has a persistent presence, and i believe is armored, as in the demo video they shrug off a tank shot easily enough.

This doesn't apply to the infestor because all of its spells are relatively expensive, and you have to pick and choose your engagements. Same with broodlords, but instead of energy, you have opportunity cost. You pay a lot of money and tech into these units that supplement your army, but without support, they can fall extremely easily.

The swarm host's presence is much more persistent, and can hold down locations much better. It'll be very hard to run 8 marines up a ramp blocked by swarm hosts and spines, conversely doing such things with broodlords or infestors are first of all very expensive, and in many scenarios they might have just served a better purpose as part of your army.

I personally would never make a broodlord and hold position it over a ramp to my expansion for the entirety of a game, but I would definitely do this with swarm hosts. This was a common tactic in brood war and It'll make the game much more interesting in my opinion


The thing is that Swarm hosts are infestor pit timing, i.e. you'll barely have any up to stop the 9-minute siege tank-marine push. The lurker coming from the t1 hydra was available in time. Two swarm hosts will simply not spawn enough locusts to avoid getting scanned and sniped, while two lurkers were deadly to marines trying to break a choke.
Dellward
Profile Joined December 2010
Australia138 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-24 16:40:47
October 24 2011 16:37 GMT
#97
I hate this unit for two reasons:

1) It looks shit, and as it's been stated, its roles are already fulfilled by other units. 15 seconds is a really long time, the spawns are melee, slow and incredibly easy to kite. That video used 9 swarm hosts, and after 30 seconds they'd only destroyed two bunkers (and could've easily been scanned and killed in the meantime). Imagine what 9 tanks or 9 immortals could've done in that time...

2) It does not feel "zergy" at all. Since when was Zerg the slow, methodical grinding race? If anything that's Terran. Zerg is the speedy, agile, hit and run in a million places with overwhelming numbers of weak units race. Think about EVERY SINGLE ZERG UNIT in Broodwar - Lings, Hydras, Mutas, Scourges, Devourers, Ultras. They were faster, but weaker than their Terran and Protoss counterparts. Even the lurker was very fast when unburrowed, allowing it to run in and deploy quicker than siege tanks, but without the superior range or damage. I've hated the introduction of the roach for this very reason, and now Blizzard gives me the most disappointing addition yet.
sagefreke
Profile Joined August 2010
United States241 Posts
October 24 2011 16:39 GMT
#98
People in this thread are grossly underestimating the amount of damage these things can soak up. They have almost 90 hp per a locust! That means if you spread your SH out siege tanks will take a minimum of 2 shots to kill free units. And it's not like you can just ignore them either since the locusts deal fairly good dps.

SH is not a unit you just mass and win with. They're a support unit.
yo yo yo
ch4ppi
Profile Joined July 2010
Germany802 Posts
October 24 2011 16:39 GMT
#99
On October 25 2011 01:37 Sueco wrote:
The thing is that Swarm hosts are infestor pit timing, i.e. you'll barely have any up to stop the 9-minute siege tank-marine push. The lurker coming from the t1 hydra was available in time.

Very good point!
The same thing applies to Infestor, which can potentionally stop the Marine/tank push, but the timing for them to come out is so narrow that u have to rush to them and miss army
r_con
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
United States824 Posts
October 24 2011 16:40 GMT
#100
there is a reason at why lurkers are not good in this game, and that's because marauders will rape them, as well marines are higher health, so lurkers would have to do more damage.

I think the swarm hosts overlaps too much with the broodlord. perhaps some sort of attack as well as its current ability. As it seems now, your just throwing in a couple roaches to die every 15 seconds. They will eventually have to do deal with it. But i don't think of it as a contain unit, there are just not enough of them, and they don't do enough damage. Also, in that preview, there were ALOT of swarm hosts, and it was just silly when they attacked.against that small force. Lurkers were not really siege units, at least, that's not how i thought of them, they were units that controlled space, and restricted paths of movement, if you were gonna dedicate to an attack as terran, you better go.

This is more like a weird broodlord now.

I'm not sure what its adding. Maybe in combination with the viper it could help. truly make it so that terran has to deal with it.
Flash Fan!
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 29 30 31 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
WardiTV Mondays #70
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
FoxeR 81
ProTech39
StarCraft: Brood War
JulyZerg 476
actioN 414
Shuttle 181
Pusan 54
ZergMaN 53
NaDa 31
soO 22
yabsab 19
ToSsGirL 18
GoRush 16
[ Show more ]
Sacsri 12
Icarus 12
Noble 11
Mind 11
Dota 2
febbydoto47
League of Legends
JimRising 866
Counter-Strike
m0e_tv898
Other Games
summit1g8679
WinterStarcraft446
RuFF_SC271
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick854
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH274
• practicex 29
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Scarra2244
• Rush1507
• Lourlo1435
• HappyZerGling100
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
17h 1m
Wardi Open
1d 5h
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-01-31
HSC XXVIII
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Acropolis #4 - TS4
Rongyi Cup S3
Nations Cup 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W7
Escore Tournament S1: W8
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.