• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 01:17
CEST 07:17
KST 14:17
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation5$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced4Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles5[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
i aint gon lie to u bruh... ASL20 Preliminary Maps BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall SC uni coach streams logging into betting site
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Earn Rewards for Every Prediction in the Game Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 650 users

[D] Swarm Host Redundant? - Page 29

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 27 28 29 30 31 Next All
Exarian
Profile Joined October 2011
Poland58 Posts
October 31 2011 08:54 GMT
#561

More importantly, though, as per my first point, it's just a silly replacement for a Lurker; which is a unit everyone wants and fills a role Zerg needs help with Unfortunately Mr. Browder seems too determined to replace core SC units with weaksauce ones, just to show everyone that "Hey guys, see!? We were right all along!"



Same thing happen to Goliath. Unit was removed "because it didin't fit SC2", and now Goliath returned with new name and model, and some tweaks (warhound). "Hey, we were right, Goliath do not Fit terran in SC2!".

In Warhound case it is not as critical as in SH case. SH is simply badly designed, If SH could fill Lurkers role in even 50%, I would not care. But this unit has limitations in every single aspect, on top of multiple unique disadvantages Lurker didn't have... Blizz can change some things by buffing/nerfing unit, but SH will be always less micro-friendly, less interesting and less gamechangeing unit then Lurker. Basically everything SH is able to to, other Zerg units are able to do already. SH add NOTHING interesting/unique to zerg arsenal, it is basically mix of few already existing units (mostly BL, but there is also some relations Infestors and masslings), SH will not create any new strategy - it will do same things other Zerg units. It is total opposite of new Terran/Toss units adding multiple unique strategies to their factions arsenal.
sleepingdog
Profile Joined August 2008
Austria6145 Posts
October 31 2011 09:06 GMT
#562
I wasn't sure about all this, but with the new "simulator"-video posted in the other thread, it really does seem like this unit serves no unique purpose at all.

There's probably a better unit to have in each and every conceivable circumstance. Broodlords seem way better in lategame for taking down natural defenses, for army-fights I suppose you'd prefer to have some infestors....

strange unit indeed
"You see....YOU SEE..." © 2010 Sen
OlorinTheWise
Profile Joined May 2010
United States173 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-31 09:19:24
October 31 2011 09:12 GMT
#563
On October 31 2011 14:59 HughJorgen wrote:
As I mentioned, the lurker worked in BW because Zerg also had dark swarm. I just don't see how a straight up 6 range (the range of the original lurker) unit would help at all in SC2.

Lurkers in the SC2 alpha had an upgrade which gave them +3 range, for a total of 9, the same as the Colossus. That would be more than enough to see them used extensively late game.

On October 31 2011 14:59 HughJorgen wrote:
Lurkers in SC2 couldn't be used to break a contain and they couldn't be used to assault a turtling Toss or Terran, not without dark swarm. I honestly think that if Blizzard put the lurker into SC2 we'd all wind up very disappointed.

I'll be the first to agree that banelings are a poor substitute vs Terran Bio, but we have fungal now and hopefully burrow move banelings will be effective. Please tell me what gap the lurker would fill that isn't already filled?

They would be extremely good against mid-game gateway pushes with mass forcefields which are very hard to hold in ZvP. It's also extremely common in mid-to-late game for expansion Hatcheries to be sniped by small groups of Marines and Marauders or Zealots; the Lurker would give Zerg players an effective space control unit to counter that type of harass.

The Lurker would also have an extreme effect in slowing or outright stopping the standard Marine/Tank pushes that Terran uses to deny a Zerg third. By burrowing Lurkers just outside of the Terran natural, and unburrowing/retreating and then reburrowing outside of the scan range, you would be able to significantly delay the push, and essentially force Terrans to make a Raven if they want to be able to hit a timing.
"Evil, be thou my good."
IAmSpooner
Profile Joined April 2010
Sweden111 Posts
October 31 2011 09:12 GMT
#564
On October 31 2011 18:06 sleepingdog wrote:
There's probably a better unit to have in each and every conceivable circumstance. Broodlords seem way better in lategame for taking down natural defenses, for army-fights I suppose you'd prefer to have some infestors....


I agree, that simulation video does make the swarm host seem redundant :/
When you play the game of drones, you win or you die.
Kaboo
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
Sweden125 Posts
October 31 2011 09:24 GMT
#565
On October 24 2011 23:40 Gfire wrote:
+ Show Spoiler [My Idea] +

I don't want to go into a lot of detail about the idea I had. It's just a way I thought in might make it better. Blizzard says they're open to suggestions, so since I did think of this, I guess I will post it on the bnet forums. I thought I'd share it here as well to see what everyone thought.

With the removal of the carrier, maybe it could be a little more carrier-like. The Locusts could be more locust-like, something like a melee Interceptor I guess.

They could fly out and stay until dying or the Swarm Host unburrows, and they could be replaces by an autospell like on the Carrier.

They should of course have a different flight pattern than interceptors, something less geometric, more swarm-like.

I guess there would be a maximum of 6, which is I think the number of holes on the back of the Swarm Host.

Whether or not you'd pay for them would depend. They could be free, and this would line up with the current Swarm Host (probably a good idea,) as well as make it less like the carrier. This is a lower tier unit, as well, and having them for free makes more sense. On the other hand, getting to dump some minerals here, where there is no larva cost, could be helpful. I'd probably make them stay free, though.


I think the idea of a T2 groundbased zerg carrier(with flying locust) is awesome! The damage don't have to be much either, as long as there is stuff in the air getting shot at. Making the units spawn often and be killed easily is also much more swarmy than the 20ish second poptime the swarmhost currently has. The locusts should slowly be eating away at any static defense of the opponent, thus the range should be something like that of a siegetank.
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication -Leonardo da Vinci
zul
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Germany5427 Posts
October 31 2011 09:45 GMT
#566
I don`t see how the SH can siege bases succesfully. The spawnrate is low and the spawned units are slow. There is no garuanted damage, because you can kite the units while killing the swarm host. Well it is right that zerg needs a unit to controll spaces, defend expansions and siege enemy bases. But the swarm host with the current design will not be able to do that (effectively).

examples:

-right now zergs cant harass a planetary fortress, unless they attack with a huge force, which leaves their bases vunerable for attacks. the swarm host wont change that, since the locust have to run into the range of the PF, will be aggroed by the PF and therefore try to attack it, which will fail.

-same goes for sieging a turteling terran or toss. The zergplayer brings the SH in position, but before the locusts can do any damage, they have to move towards the bunkers, cannons, defensive placed buildings(wall), tank-line and they will take damage before they even reach their target. Depending on how many units/cannons are defending they will do none or just minimal damage.

The fact the swarm host does no immediate damage (unlike the lurker), makes his succes (due to gamedesign) very questionable. Even in big fights the SH wont help much, since his spawnlings will just die in AOE damage.
keep it deep! @zulison
Capiachi
Profile Joined October 2010
78 Posts
October 31 2011 10:09 GMT
#567
To me this seems like a faster teched broodlord, except that it cant move like broodlords can. _IF_ the metagame stays the same and terran keeps the sort of marine tank (add in new unit), then this style wont work anymore. Broodlords made siegetanks unsiege, swarm of banelings and lings run in = dead marines.

Wanna run forward and snipe Swarm hosts ? Fungal, blings.

I would much rather have the zerg get lurkers again. Same range as siege tanks and maybe not burrowed but a prep time. Then again this doesn't feel zergy...

I think most of the units added in feel very unsatisfying. Replicator? Seriously ? "We cant think of a new unit type, so lets make one that can be all..."

I'll have to wait for beta and release to make my final call, but to me HotS feels a little weak. WoL seems more interesting.
Exarian
Profile Joined October 2011
Poland58 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-31 10:21:19
October 31 2011 10:15 GMT
#568
@Zul

Exactly, SH add nearly nothing to Zerg gameplay. Almost everything SH is able to do, other Zerg units can do with similar or even better cost effectiveness. On top of that entire unit concept is mix and copy-paste from already existing Zerg units. SH is the least unique, interesting and versatile new unit in entire HotS.

On top of that SH is addressing nearly NONE of zerg race design holes. It is not real siege unit, it is not unit able to engage enemy with number advantage, it has no real ground-holding capabilities, it has no AoE.

Basically everything SH added, zerg race already had in their arsenal in more interesting form (BL, Infestor etc.). It mean SH will not open area for new tactics/strategies, SH will not give us new combos, will not fix any of Zerg race issues, will not allow us to do anything new. Even if people say of "amazing Blinding Cloud - SH combo", other Zerg units will benefit this awesome spell far more then SH. I see no single reason of making SH in expansion, I can't see any real-game situation where SH is even slightly more useful then other Zerg options.

And why Mr. Browder hate Lurker so much, if he replaced it with something as boring and limited as SH?
Cyber_Cheese
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Australia3615 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-31 10:46:29
October 31 2011 10:21 GMT
#569
Can someone link the simulation here?

Edit: What? The shredder thread had it, no wonder I couldn't find it.
It seems to scream "MAKE ZERGLINGS INSTEAD", but the fact they keep spawning might mean lings don't make it redundant, we'll see.
The moment you lose confidence in yourself, is the moment the world loses it's confidence in you.
aScaris
Profile Joined February 2011
Germany124 Posts
October 31 2011 10:22 GMT
#570
sure, videos can be found here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=280988
Ganseng
Profile Joined July 2011
Russian Federation473 Posts
October 31 2011 10:33 GMT
#571
i wish this thing evolved from hydra.
and yes, i don't see much in this thing. but we'll have to wait, hopefully blizzard know what they do.
Perseverance
Profile Joined February 2010
Japan2800 Posts
October 31 2011 10:37 GMT
#572
The swarm host looks like it will be a staple map control unit for the zerg, which is going to be very important in hots since the shredder basically nullifies speedlings.
<3 Moonbattles
Exarian
Profile Joined October 2011
Poland58 Posts
October 31 2011 10:58 GMT
#573
Shredder also nulify slow locusts... SH is definitely not good choice to deal with these things.
Jehct
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
New Zealand9115 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-31 11:12:24
October 31 2011 11:07 GMT
#574
On October 31 2011 18:45 zul wrote:
I don`t see how the SH can siege bases succesfully. The spawnrate is low and the spawned units are slow. There is no garuanted damage, because you can kite the units while killing the swarm host. Well it is right that zerg needs a unit to controll spaces, defend expansions and siege enemy bases. But the swarm host with the current design will not be able to do that (effectively).

examples:

-right now zergs cant harass a planetary fortress, unless they attack with a huge force, which leaves their bases vunerable for attacks. the swarm host wont change that, since the locust have to run into the range of the PF, will be aggroed by the PF and therefore try to attack it, which will fail.

-same goes for sieging a turteling terran or toss. The zergplayer brings the SH in position, but before the locusts can do any damage, they have to move towards the bunkers, cannons, defensive placed buildings(wall), tank-line and they will take damage before they even reach their target. Depending on how many units/cannons are defending they will do none or just minimal damage.

The fact the swarm host does no immediate damage (unlike the lurker), makes his succes (due to gamedesign) very questionable. Even in big fights the SH wont help much, since his spawnlings will just die in AOE damage.

At least try the unit in the HOTS custom map before commenting on it's usefulness. These things do huge damage to a planetary - like 5 will bring a planetary to half health assuming no repair/support; any kind of fortified, immobile position inevitably takes huge damage. Their dps/health is seriously impressive when you consider the cost.

Of course if you move in on 8 cannons with 1 swarm host it won't work; try 6 swarm hosts and that base will go down (eventually), much like siege tanks.

The lack of immediate damage does a good job of keeping different races different. In it's current form the swarm host just feels/looks cool; I'd be sad to see it go. Compared to lurkers in BW the two units fill totally different roles, and if the lurker replaced the swarm host it wouldn't really be a lurker anymore =(


On October 31 2011 19:21 Cyber_Cheese wrote:
Can someone link the simulation here?

Edit: What? The shredder thread had it, no wonder I couldn't find it.
It seems to scream "MAKE ZERGLINGS INSTEAD", but the fact they keep spawning might mean lings don't make it redundant, we'll see.

The simulation in the shredder thread looked super inaccurate and buggy - at any given time only about a third of the locusts that should have spawned were out (ie. it was closer to the damage of 3-4 swarm hosts).
"You seem to think about this game a lot"
IGotPlayguuu
Profile Joined June 2011
Italy660 Posts
October 31 2011 11:09 GMT
#575
IMHO swarm host is not a very good unit at controlling a zone. The real problem is that it spawn locusts very slowly, and locust can be killed. So, if you put 2 or 3 of them for example in a location, i think 8 marine + medvac can easily clean em up. The same thing applies for drops: SH is useless against drops...
BW |JaeDong|Bisu|FBH|BeSt| SC2 |MC|DRG|MMA|TLO|HuK|July|ClouD| ||| Boxer best player ever! ||| "HuK never use penix" ||| I <3 SeleCT ||| GO Space! ||| Nerf Roach! |||
Competent
Profile Joined April 2010
United States406 Posts
October 31 2011 11:22 GMT
#576
Couldn't agree more with the OP. When you have two units that already create weaker disposable zerg units to barrage your enemy with it sounds dumb to create ANOTHER one that does the same thing. Don't get me wrong, I love the unit, I just think the Lurker would have gave more contrast here. Along with the fact that everyone wants it back, everyone but the terran/toss of course.
Nurrrhhh, I'm gonna be A+ by Wendsday! -Day[9] "I'm going to spread out my lings so it looks like there is more. Lots of animals do that." -CatZ
DigitalDevil
Profile Joined October 2011
219 Posts
October 31 2011 11:39 GMT
#577
On October 31 2011 20:22 Competent wrote:
Couldn't agree more with the OP. When you have two units that already create weaker disposable zerg units to barrage your enemy with it sounds dumb to create ANOTHER one that does the same thing. Don't get me wrong, I love the unit, I just think the Lurker would have gave more contrast here. Along with the fact that everyone wants it back, everyone but the terran/toss of course.


I'm a toss and I would rather a lurker (or even better, OP's carrier style locust idea) come back than have the swarm host. Those arguing to try out the swarm host before dismissing it completely miss the point. Numbers can always be adjusted yes, but the real question to ask would be if the unit design is actually exciting. For the player, I see little micro potential in the swarm host. For the spectator, the swarm host is extremely underwhelming to watch. It plays out like other zerg units and works too similarly to a brood lord. There is hardly any "feeling" of distinction and inspiration/horror when you see a swarm host. You don't get an "Oh shit, that's a swarm host!" feeling at all.
Exarian
Profile Joined October 2011
Poland58 Posts
October 31 2011 11:44 GMT
#578
Numbers can always be adjusted yes, but the real question to ask would be if the unit design is actually exciting.


Exactly. Unit is boring, and feel like copy-paste mix of already existing units. Nothing new in terms of strategy, tactics or fun. Lurker is over 9000 times more exciting both to use and to deal with. It's simple: Interesting unit filling multiple holes in Zerg arsenal was replaced by boring units doing same things as already existing units on top of not being able to fill most of the holes.
FluXxxx
Profile Joined August 2011
Germany57 Posts
October 31 2011 13:35 GMT
#579
the only reason i can see this unit making it is that the SH shoots with small hydra models, so the model will finally be useful o.O
sleepingdog
Profile Joined August 2008
Austria6145 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-10-31 13:49:25
October 31 2011 13:47 GMT
#580
On October 31 2011 20:39 DigitalDevil wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 31 2011 20:22 Competent wrote:
Couldn't agree more with the OP. When you have two units that already create weaker disposable zerg units to barrage your enemy with it sounds dumb to create ANOTHER one that does the same thing. Don't get me wrong, I love the unit, I just think the Lurker would have gave more contrast here. Along with the fact that everyone wants it back, everyone but the terran/toss of course.


I'm a toss and I would rather a lurker (or even better, OP's carrier style locust idea) come back than have the swarm host. Those arguing to try out the swarm host before dismissing it completely miss the point. Numbers can always be adjusted yes, but the real question to ask would be if the unit design is actually exciting. For the player, I see little micro potential in the swarm host. For the spectator, the swarm host is extremely underwhelming to watch. It plays out like other zerg units and works too similarly to a brood lord. There is hardly any "feeling" of distinction and inspiration/horror when you see a swarm host. You don't get an "Oh shit, that's a swarm host!" feeling at all.


I actually had to laugh at the image of Day9 wispering...."ohh....it's a swarm host....uhhhhh"

In all honesty: the swarm host just seems like an imbecile broodlord who never learned how to fly when he was a kid and decided to just burrow himself instead.
"You see....YOU SEE..." © 2010 Sen
Prev 1 27 28 29 30 31 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 4h 43m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft498
Nina 207
StarCraft: Brood War
Leta 307
PianO 158
Noble 29
Icarus 10
Dota 2
monkeys_forever672
XaKoH 9
League of Legends
JimRising 760
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K138
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox550
Other Games
summit1g6916
shahzam890
ViBE222
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick44682
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH308
• practicex 111
• Hupsaiya 59
• Kozan
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• Diggity6
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush1094
• masondota2498
• Lourlo452
• Stunt351
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
4h 43m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
10h 43m
WardiTV European League
10h 43m
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
Replay Cast
18h 43m
RSL Revival
1d 4h
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
OSC
1d 7h
Replay Cast
1d 18h
RSL Revival
2 days
Classic vs Cure
FEL
2 days
OSC
2 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
FEL
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.