TL Mafia XXVIII
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
lakrismamma
Sweden543 Posts
| ||
lakrismamma
Sweden543 Posts
(I know you are all from the US but its 8 in the morning here =) | ||
lakrismamma
Sweden543 Posts
On July 18 2010 03:47 ~OpZ~ wrote: ##Vote: Chaoser He's mafia. Also, other mafia, = Darth, and Infundiblum. Trust me. This is a very strage post? Explain yourself. If you are town then why would you spread confusion like this? Also so everyone notice this since I didnt until now. On July 02 2010 07:57 Bill Murray wrote: 24/24 town-aligned players alive 2/2 Veterans alive 2/2 Town KP roles alive 2/2 Medics alive 2/2 DTs alive 6/6 Mafia-players alive 1/1 Godfather 1/1 Suicide Bomber Mafia KP: 2 (until they have under 1.5 when divided by 2) Double lynches: 2 | ||
lakrismamma
Sweden543 Posts
On July 18 2010 04:26 zeks wrote: lynch inactive first day in all the recent games i've played theres always mafia who play lurker dt rolecheck night 1 okay for me - check active ppl as usual Agree with this. Also I don't think we have to bother to make sure the DTs don't overlap at least not now in the beginning. -There are only 2 DTs so the chance are little they will check the same person. | ||
lakrismamma
Sweden543 Posts
On July 18 2010 12:03 citi.zen wrote: A few comments on how I see the game going: 1. PMs are allowed so trust circles are the way to go. Sooner or later they will form because of Dt checks, medic protection, vet soaking up a hit when we know they are the lone vet, etc. When this happens we'll be in good shape. 2. BCs list is fine, but many people seem to miss its point entirely. 3. There is no roleblocker, but there is a suicide bomber. Be very careful with your circles. Speak through confirmed townies if possible. 4. We lynch an inactive and/or bad player day one. Hyperbola is a fine target. Bumatlarge is ok too, bringing grudges from prior games here can derail us for many pages. 5. I already voted for Darth, why is it not counted? I will likely change it, but still! Good post! Abstaining is stupid. Part of why suggesting voting for for inactive persons is to make that person become active to defend himself therefore we get more to read from and mafia cant hide in the inactives. I think Hyperbola has defended himself pretty well. ##vote LaxerCannon He is usually more active so get to it Laxer. | ||
lakrismamma
Sweden543 Posts
On July 18 2010 15:29 Divinek wrote: How is voting for some one cause of a long , useful post defending himself pretty well? He said in other games he has been quiet but that doesnt mean that shit is gonna fly here. And he didnt really say why someone who makes a long post is a scum or anything. I dont feel he really defended himself well at all You are right. It was not a good defence I should have explained myself. It is just that I feel that a mafia wouldnt play that way. mafia would lay low with his many inactives they can easily hide. He is probably just a bad townplayer. Well I guess we could lynch him for beeing that. But I rather pick another inactive. I change my vote should have looked over the alternatives more carefully laxer has actually made a couple of posts. ##unvote LaxerCannon ##vote Subversion | ||
lakrismamma
Sweden543 Posts
DTA is probably just inactive town. But in that case we have no need for him either. So he is a decent alternative. I will follow citizen though to create a third alternative. ##Unvote ##vote ketomai | ||
lakrismamma
Sweden543 Posts
| ||
lakrismamma
Sweden543 Posts
If we are allowed to PM each other, then we could have a IRQ chanel, then we could have another forum. Why not let us write here instead? | ||
lakrismamma
Sweden543 Posts
On July 20 2010 09:31 Foolishness wrote: You'd have an easier time if you look at lakrismamma or citi.zen If you are going to throw accusations around at least explain yourself. Posts like this just couse confusion and dont help town at all. Because I dont have any accusations i cant defend myself either. I'm just going to say that you play bad if you are town. To the new players you seach how you search for someones posts is like this. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/search.php?q=&t=c&f=-1&u=lakrismamma&gb=date Just replace my name with whoever you want to seach for. | ||
lakrismamma
Sweden543 Posts
On July 20 2010 07:15 LaXerCannon wrote: What interests me is this block of voting: Misder -> Hyperbola Divinek -> Hyperbola Pandain -> Hyperbola Pyrrhuloxia -> Abstain zeks -> Hyperbola SiNiquity -> Hyperbola and these people: Misder -> Hyperbola* -> LaXercannon zeks -> Hyperbola* -> abstain My head hurts so I'll just give a couple one liners for now (I've been digging through this damned thread for like an eternity) The Hyperbola bandwagon Misder @ 10:43 Divinek @ 10:51 Pandain @ 10:56 zeks @ 11:22 SiNiquity @ 11:37 Within an hour, Hyperbola gets bandwagonned and is in first place: @ 11:37 (after roffles' vote) Definitely suspicious considering how fast and compact the votes were together Misder -> Hyperbola* -> LaXercannon zeks -> Hyperbola* -> abstain Misder -> starts bandwagon, jumps off when Hyperbola's screwed zeks -> fourth voter for bandwagon, jumps off when Hyperbola's screwed attempts at lowering suspicion? This is definitively suspicious, more of Zeks than of Misder. Here are his posts. On July 18 2010 04:26 zeks wrote: lynch inactive first day in all the recent games i've played theres always mafia who play lurker dt rolecheck night 1 okay for me - check active ppl as usual On July 18 2010 11:22 zeks wrote: ##vote hyperbola place holder On July 18 2010 22:59 zeks wrote: 5 people is really a miniscule number. this whole supposed "bandwagon" wasn't exactly bad - at lesat it got hyperbola talking and it got us somewhere - rather than the 1 vote everywhere its important to not bandwagon but its also important to have a unified town when necessary. my vote won't be on Hyperbola tonight you can guarantee it. Just give me a couple hours to see who's a better target. Why didn't you abstain now that you knew you could? On July 19 2010 08:58 zeks wrote: ##unvote hyperbola ##abstain incase i forget to unvote hyperbola like i promised 8 hours later with only 1 hour until lynchtime and almost certain that Hyperbola would be killed. On July 19 2010 23:23 zeks wrote: ^ picking out choice words out of everyones posts is quite convenient. What are you trying to paint of us? Someone is trying to summarize the thread, you are against that. On July 20 2010 07:36 zeks wrote: i explained why i wasn't going to end up having my vote placed on hyperbola. I had it on him first to pressure him to talk and then I said he had a valid defense so I guaranteed that my vote wouldn't be left on him and I'll try to find someone else. When I returned to my comp like 8 hours later then I changed to abstain. Don't get me wrong I think the Hyperbola list is a perfect choice (the obvious one) the look at cause he did flip town and who'd be more suspicious than the people who voted him. So why didn't you find anyone else to vote for instead of Hyperbola? Why abstain when you said in the beginning that you wanted to lynch inactives? There where inactives why not vote for one of them? Answers please. | ||
lakrismamma
Sweden543 Posts
Im not saying Subversion is innocent but I believe that we have much stronger candidates for a lynch then him. I font get how the suspicion for Zeks landed on him in the bandwagon instead. Brownbear haven't acted that scummy either in my opinion. I think he is just an inactive townie that got accused and got active as a result. DTA is playing disturbingly for town but I don't believe him to be mafia either. Roffels is playing too low key for my taste. He haven't said much at all this game compared to his usual playing style. he wants rages against Brownbear and then Subversion just to take back his vote once the town have noted his accusations.. | ||
lakrismamma
Sweden543 Posts
| ||
lakrismamma
Sweden543 Posts
I think Roffles are playing suspicions and since there are no other decent alternative I will vote for him. Think for yourself people and don't just jump on any bandwagon that has started, Because my last vote wasn't in bol,d tnx Pandain for pm:ing me. ##vote Roffles | ||
lakrismamma
Sweden543 Posts
I have changed my mind after reading chaosers posts I consider him far more scummy than Subversion and DTA. I will vote for him so my vote means something. Roffels are still under heavy suspicion though. ##unvote ##vote Chaoser | ||
lakrismamma
Sweden543 Posts
On July 22 2010 07:02 Bill Murray wrote: vote count: not voting: double lynch: citi.zen changed his vote to chaoser so its 7-7-6 | ||
lakrismamma
Sweden543 Posts
I can agree that voting DTA will not give any information. He has just been acting crazy all game. Subversion will give more information but he has soft claimed blue.. If he is mafia then its a good trick. But if he isn't then I think he should claim fully so that a medic can protect him. Otherwise he is dead tonight either way. ## vote abstain | ||
lakrismamma
Sweden543 Posts
| ||
lakrismamma
Sweden543 Posts
| ||
lakrismamma
Sweden543 Posts
| ||
| ||