Should be live in 10-15 minutes after I've warmed up.
[url blocked]
Forum Index > User Streams |
KwarK
United States40776 Posts
Should be live in 10-15 minutes after I've warmed up. [url blocked] | ||
hefty
Denmark555 Posts
Entertaining play - thumbs up! | ||
KwarK
United States40776 Posts
| ||
Grobyc
Canada18410 Posts
thanks for streaming kwark. btw, what is your APM in some of these recent games? from watching the stream it looks more like you're at least 130+ | ||
KwarK
United States40776 Posts
| ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28262 Posts
On November 18 2009 03:51 LaLuSh wrote: Show nested quote + On November 17 2009 19:15 meathook wrote: On November 17 2009 19:03 KwarK wrote: On November 17 2009 18:56 meathook wrote: On November 17 2009 16:43 KwarK wrote: On November 17 2009 16:24 Cube wrote: On November 17 2009 13:25 scintilliaSD wrote: On November 17 2009 13:16 foppa wrote: i dont understand how you can be b+ with 80 eapm. it just doesnt make sense Watch and learn. some people call it cheese Vast majority of my games don't involve cheese. As the guy said, watch and learn. True. Because in the eyes of a 100 apm toss marching up the ladder, proxy tech, centre gateway and two base carriers is the very definition of standard play. As far as I remember I've used carriers once since the B ranks and that was on 5 bases in a very long PvZ. Centre gateways PvP once against a P who scouts way too late. No proxy tech, there's no point because decent players can work out exactly what's missing and it just slows you down. The fact that I'm streaming gives people the new opportunity to see how I play before criticising it, instead of just assuming all I do is bulldog (I never bulldog) or some shit like that. Don't get me wrong, I'm open to criticism, that's one of the most valuable aspects of streaming games to the public imo. I'll be able to get dozens of new perspectives on my game. But criticism from guys who haven't got any idea what they're talking about because they haven't taken the time to look but still feel like chiming in their two cents pisses me off. I remember playing you a couple of times on iccup, and what I wrote above is exactly what you were doing. You posted a replay in the who's who a while back showcasing a proxy reaver strategy against some poor terran (who ended up raping you, actually). I have seen games you've played on different occasions, each time it made me wince due to some sort of cheese by you. You are, in fact, known for this. If you feel I have an erroneous perception of your playstyle, you have only yourself to blame. Dude prolly calls it "aggressive play". No way he's cheesin. Most games I've seen with kwark he does weird shit. His definition of cheese only seems to stretch to proxying shit, so we can't be using it here. Alot of the time his weird shit works too. But eventually you run out of weird shit... It's like telling kwanro fans that kwanro's a cheeser. "No, he's just an aggressive player". "No that 2hatch muta vs P was a timing attack, it wasn't an all-in". People just have different ways of defining the word. 9 pool ling runby delaying protoss followed by 2 hatch muta is not cheese | ||
lIlIlIlIlIlI
Korea (South)3851 Posts
| ||
IntoTheWow
is awesome32244 Posts
On November 18 2009 12:10 Liquid`Drone wrote: Show nested quote + On November 18 2009 03:51 LaLuSh wrote: On November 17 2009 19:15 meathook wrote: On November 17 2009 19:03 KwarK wrote: On November 17 2009 18:56 meathook wrote: On November 17 2009 16:43 KwarK wrote: On November 17 2009 16:24 Cube wrote: On November 17 2009 13:25 scintilliaSD wrote: On November 17 2009 13:16 foppa wrote: i dont understand how you can be b+ with 80 eapm. it just doesnt make sense Watch and learn. some people call it cheese Vast majority of my games don't involve cheese. As the guy said, watch and learn. True. Because in the eyes of a 100 apm toss marching up the ladder, proxy tech, centre gateway and two base carriers is the very definition of standard play. As far as I remember I've used carriers once since the B ranks and that was on 5 bases in a very long PvZ. Centre gateways PvP once against a P who scouts way too late. No proxy tech, there's no point because decent players can work out exactly what's missing and it just slows you down. The fact that I'm streaming gives people the new opportunity to see how I play before criticising it, instead of just assuming all I do is bulldog (I never bulldog) or some shit like that. Don't get me wrong, I'm open to criticism, that's one of the most valuable aspects of streaming games to the public imo. I'll be able to get dozens of new perspectives on my game. But criticism from guys who haven't got any idea what they're talking about because they haven't taken the time to look but still feel like chiming in their two cents pisses me off. I remember playing you a couple of times on iccup, and what I wrote above is exactly what you were doing. You posted a replay in the who's who a while back showcasing a proxy reaver strategy against some poor terran (who ended up raping you, actually). I have seen games you've played on different occasions, each time it made me wince due to some sort of cheese by you. You are, in fact, known for this. If you feel I have an erroneous perception of your playstyle, you have only yourself to blame. Dude prolly calls it "aggressive play". No way he's cheesin. Most games I've seen with kwark he does weird shit. His definition of cheese only seems to stretch to proxying shit, so we can't be using it here. Alot of the time his weird shit works too. But eventually you run out of weird shit... It's like telling kwanro fans that kwanro's a cheeser. "No, he's just an aggressive player". "No that 2hatch muta vs P was a timing attack, it wasn't an all-in". People just have different ways of defining the word. 9 pool ling runby delaying protoss followed by 2 hatch muta is not cheese http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=105796¤tpage=1#13 apparently anything that does not involve getting 3 hatcheries is cheese! | ||
SkepTicAL
Canada872 Posts
On November 18 2009 01:30 KwarK wrote: Show nested quote + On November 17 2009 20:40 {88}iNcontroL wrote: Longi becomes motw and suddenly kwark is scrambling for streaming. I got a new computer last week with dual core. I actually tried streaming about three months ago (there was a blog about it at the time) but it was too laggy to work. So the idea that the two are in any way related is unequivocably false. I think he was mocking you more than picking on the timing. You did afterall go like 50-4 vs foreigners only on longi avoiding pvp altogether . | ||
DrainX
Sweden3187 Posts
On November 18 2009 12:43 IntoTheWow wrote: Show nested quote + On November 18 2009 12:10 Liquid`Drone wrote: On November 18 2009 03:51 LaLuSh wrote: On November 17 2009 19:15 meathook wrote: On November 17 2009 19:03 KwarK wrote: On November 17 2009 18:56 meathook wrote: On November 17 2009 16:43 KwarK wrote: On November 17 2009 16:24 Cube wrote: On November 17 2009 13:25 scintilliaSD wrote: On November 17 2009 13:16 foppa wrote: i dont understand how you can be b+ with 80 eapm. it just doesnt make sense Watch and learn. some people call it cheese Vast majority of my games don't involve cheese. As the guy said, watch and learn. True. Because in the eyes of a 100 apm toss marching up the ladder, proxy tech, centre gateway and two base carriers is the very definition of standard play. As far as I remember I've used carriers once since the B ranks and that was on 5 bases in a very long PvZ. Centre gateways PvP once against a P who scouts way too late. No proxy tech, there's no point because decent players can work out exactly what's missing and it just slows you down. The fact that I'm streaming gives people the new opportunity to see how I play before criticising it, instead of just assuming all I do is bulldog (I never bulldog) or some shit like that. Don't get me wrong, I'm open to criticism, that's one of the most valuable aspects of streaming games to the public imo. I'll be able to get dozens of new perspectives on my game. But criticism from guys who haven't got any idea what they're talking about because they haven't taken the time to look but still feel like chiming in their two cents pisses me off. I remember playing you a couple of times on iccup, and what I wrote above is exactly what you were doing. You posted a replay in the who's who a while back showcasing a proxy reaver strategy against some poor terran (who ended up raping you, actually). I have seen games you've played on different occasions, each time it made me wince due to some sort of cheese by you. You are, in fact, known for this. If you feel I have an erroneous perception of your playstyle, you have only yourself to blame. Dude prolly calls it "aggressive play". No way he's cheesin. Most games I've seen with kwark he does weird shit. His definition of cheese only seems to stretch to proxying shit, so we can't be using it here. Alot of the time his weird shit works too. But eventually you run out of weird shit... It's like telling kwanro fans that kwanro's a cheeser. "No, he's just an aggressive player". "No that 2hatch muta vs P was a timing attack, it wasn't an all-in". People just have different ways of defining the word. 9 pool ling runby delaying protoss followed by 2 hatch muta is not cheese http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=105796¤tpage=1#13 apparently anything that does not involve getting 3 hatcheries is cheese! Someone needs to give that memo to Yellow 8 years ago. | ||
Pads
England3228 Posts
| ||
Liquid`Drone
Norway28262 Posts
On November 18 2009 12:43 IntoTheWow wrote: Show nested quote + On November 18 2009 12:10 Liquid`Drone wrote: On November 18 2009 03:51 LaLuSh wrote: On November 17 2009 19:15 meathook wrote: On November 17 2009 19:03 KwarK wrote: On November 17 2009 18:56 meathook wrote: On November 17 2009 16:43 KwarK wrote: On November 17 2009 16:24 Cube wrote: On November 17 2009 13:25 scintilliaSD wrote: On November 17 2009 13:16 foppa wrote: i dont understand how you can be b+ with 80 eapm. it just doesnt make sense Watch and learn. some people call it cheese Vast majority of my games don't involve cheese. As the guy said, watch and learn. True. Because in the eyes of a 100 apm toss marching up the ladder, proxy tech, centre gateway and two base carriers is the very definition of standard play. As far as I remember I've used carriers once since the B ranks and that was on 5 bases in a very long PvZ. Centre gateways PvP once against a P who scouts way too late. No proxy tech, there's no point because decent players can work out exactly what's missing and it just slows you down. The fact that I'm streaming gives people the new opportunity to see how I play before criticising it, instead of just assuming all I do is bulldog (I never bulldog) or some shit like that. Don't get me wrong, I'm open to criticism, that's one of the most valuable aspects of streaming games to the public imo. I'll be able to get dozens of new perspectives on my game. But criticism from guys who haven't got any idea what they're talking about because they haven't taken the time to look but still feel like chiming in their two cents pisses me off. I remember playing you a couple of times on iccup, and what I wrote above is exactly what you were doing. You posted a replay in the who's who a while back showcasing a proxy reaver strategy against some poor terran (who ended up raping you, actually). I have seen games you've played on different occasions, each time it made me wince due to some sort of cheese by you. You are, in fact, known for this. If you feel I have an erroneous perception of your playstyle, you have only yourself to blame. Dude prolly calls it "aggressive play". No way he's cheesin. Most games I've seen with kwark he does weird shit. His definition of cheese only seems to stretch to proxying shit, so we can't be using it here. Alot of the time his weird shit works too. But eventually you run out of weird shit... It's like telling kwanro fans that kwanro's a cheeser. "No, he's just an aggressive player". "No that 2hatch muta vs P was a timing attack, it wasn't an all-in". People just have different ways of defining the word. 9 pool ling runby delaying protoss followed by 2 hatch muta is not cheese http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=105796¤tpage=1#13 apparently anything that does not involve getting 3 hatcheries is cheese! wow theres a lot of retarded posts in there not having 2 hatch play in your repertoire makes you so much easier to play against | ||
KwarK
United States40776 Posts
On November 19 2009 08:40 Liquid`Drone wrote: Show nested quote + On November 18 2009 12:43 IntoTheWow wrote: On November 18 2009 12:10 Liquid`Drone wrote: On November 18 2009 03:51 LaLuSh wrote: On November 17 2009 19:15 meathook wrote: On November 17 2009 19:03 KwarK wrote: On November 17 2009 18:56 meathook wrote: On November 17 2009 16:43 KwarK wrote: On November 17 2009 16:24 Cube wrote: On November 17 2009 13:25 scintilliaSD wrote: [quote] Watch and learn. some people call it cheese Vast majority of my games don't involve cheese. As the guy said, watch and learn. True. Because in the eyes of a 100 apm toss marching up the ladder, proxy tech, centre gateway and two base carriers is the very definition of standard play. As far as I remember I've used carriers once since the B ranks and that was on 5 bases in a very long PvZ. Centre gateways PvP once against a P who scouts way too late. No proxy tech, there's no point because decent players can work out exactly what's missing and it just slows you down. The fact that I'm streaming gives people the new opportunity to see how I play before criticising it, instead of just assuming all I do is bulldog (I never bulldog) or some shit like that. Don't get me wrong, I'm open to criticism, that's one of the most valuable aspects of streaming games to the public imo. I'll be able to get dozens of new perspectives on my game. But criticism from guys who haven't got any idea what they're talking about because they haven't taken the time to look but still feel like chiming in their two cents pisses me off. I remember playing you a couple of times on iccup, and what I wrote above is exactly what you were doing. You posted a replay in the who's who a while back showcasing a proxy reaver strategy against some poor terran (who ended up raping you, actually). I have seen games you've played on different occasions, each time it made me wince due to some sort of cheese by you. You are, in fact, known for this. If you feel I have an erroneous perception of your playstyle, you have only yourself to blame. Dude prolly calls it "aggressive play". No way he's cheesin. Most games I've seen with kwark he does weird shit. His definition of cheese only seems to stretch to proxying shit, so we can't be using it here. Alot of the time his weird shit works too. But eventually you run out of weird shit... It's like telling kwanro fans that kwanro's a cheeser. "No, he's just an aggressive player". "No that 2hatch muta vs P was a timing attack, it wasn't an all-in". People just have different ways of defining the word. 9 pool ling runby delaying protoss followed by 2 hatch muta is not cheese http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=105796¤tpage=1#13 apparently anything that does not involve getting 3 hatcheries is cheese! wow theres a lot of retarded posts in there not having 2 hatch play in your repertoire makes you so much easier to play against But if for some reason everything fails then you lose!!! as opposed to every other build... | ||
eXigent.
Canada2419 Posts
On November 19 2009 08:43 KwarK wrote: Show nested quote + On November 19 2009 08:40 Liquid`Drone wrote: On November 18 2009 12:43 IntoTheWow wrote: On November 18 2009 12:10 Liquid`Drone wrote: On November 18 2009 03:51 LaLuSh wrote: On November 17 2009 19:15 meathook wrote: On November 17 2009 19:03 KwarK wrote: On November 17 2009 18:56 meathook wrote: On November 17 2009 16:43 KwarK wrote: On November 17 2009 16:24 Cube wrote: [quote] some people call it cheese Vast majority of my games don't involve cheese. As the guy said, watch and learn. True. Because in the eyes of a 100 apm toss marching up the ladder, proxy tech, centre gateway and two base carriers is the very definition of standard play. As far as I remember I've used carriers once since the B ranks and that was on 5 bases in a very long PvZ. Centre gateways PvP once against a P who scouts way too late. No proxy tech, there's no point because decent players can work out exactly what's missing and it just slows you down. The fact that I'm streaming gives people the new opportunity to see how I play before criticising it, instead of just assuming all I do is bulldog (I never bulldog) or some shit like that. Don't get me wrong, I'm open to criticism, that's one of the most valuable aspects of streaming games to the public imo. I'll be able to get dozens of new perspectives on my game. But criticism from guys who haven't got any idea what they're talking about because they haven't taken the time to look but still feel like chiming in their two cents pisses me off. I remember playing you a couple of times on iccup, and what I wrote above is exactly what you were doing. You posted a replay in the who's who a while back showcasing a proxy reaver strategy against some poor terran (who ended up raping you, actually). I have seen games you've played on different occasions, each time it made me wince due to some sort of cheese by you. You are, in fact, known for this. If you feel I have an erroneous perception of your playstyle, you have only yourself to blame. Dude prolly calls it "aggressive play". No way he's cheesin. Most games I've seen with kwark he does weird shit. His definition of cheese only seems to stretch to proxying shit, so we can't be using it here. Alot of the time his weird shit works too. But eventually you run out of weird shit... It's like telling kwanro fans that kwanro's a cheeser. "No, he's just an aggressive player". "No that 2hatch muta vs P was a timing attack, it wasn't an all-in". People just have different ways of defining the word. 9 pool ling runby delaying protoss followed by 2 hatch muta is not cheese http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=105796¤tpage=1#13 apparently anything that does not involve getting 3 hatcheries is cheese! wow theres a lot of retarded posts in there not having 2 hatch play in your repertoire makes you so much easier to play against But if for some reason everything fails then you lose!!! as opposed to every other build... 2hatch builds can fail? news to me... | ||
Pads
England3228 Posts
| ||
BroOd
Austin10831 Posts
| ||
violett
Germany143 Posts
| ||
Corvi
Germany1406 Posts
| ||
wok
United States504 Posts
| ||
foppa
Canada451 Posts
| ||
| ||
ESL Pro Tour
Spring 2024 - EU Playoffs D1
HeRoMaRinE vs LamboLIVE!
Clem vs Bly
ESL.tv3080
RotterdaM1173
ComeBackTV 1036
IndyStarCraft 357
TaKeTV 337
CosmosSc2 127
BRAT_OK 85
3DClanTV 71
[ Submit Event ] |
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War GuemChi 29452 Dota 2Hyuk 1864 ggaemo 809 BeSt 527 Stork 211 firebathero 184 Rush 177 Backho 40 zelot 33 Barracks 21 [ Show more ] Counter-Strike Other Games gofns17109 hiko1717 Liquid`RaSZi1584 Beastyqt1121 qojqva875 crisheroes813 Hui .526 Lowko271 ToD264 shoxiejesuss233 NuckleDu152 Mew2King114 ceh9113 Liquid`VortiX111 KnowMe81 Trikslyr62 B2W.Neo58 nookyyy 51 Organizations
StarCraft 2 • intothetv StarCraft: Brood War• Gussbus • Poblha • Migwel • Laughngamez YouTube • aXEnki • LaughNgamez Trovo • IndyKCrew • Kozan Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
ESL Pro Tour
World Team League
ESL Pro Tour
Reynor vs MaNa
GunGFuBanDa vs Spirit
Elazer vs Krystianer
SKillous vs MaxPax
Big Brain Bouts
Korean StarCraft League
Afreeca Starleague
hero vs Soulkey
AfreecaTV Pro Series
Reynor vs Cure
ESL Pro Tour
World Team League
ESL Pro Tour
[ Show More ] BSL
Zhanhun vs DragOn
Dewalt vs Sziky
CSO Cup
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
ESL Pro Tour
World Team League
ESL Pro Tour
BSL
Gypsy vs Bonyth
Mihu vs XiaoShuai
ESL Open Cup
ESL Open Cup
ESL Open Cup
ESL Pro Tour
|
|