EPTThe Automated Ban List - Page 2734
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
| ||
FO-nTTaX
Johto4979 Posts
| ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
| ||
|
MysteryMeat1
United States3292 Posts
On May 06 2016 06:40 dAPhREAk wrote: why dont you just delete it yourself by editing it and removing all text? If the blog post is old enough you can't edit it. It had my real name in there and I don't want this account linked to anything professional I do in the future :p If a kid in my class can find it then someone else could as well | ||
Jer99
Canada8159 Posts
| ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
On May 06 2016 07:59 MysteryMeat1 wrote: If the blog post is old enough you can't edit it. It had my real name in there and I don't want this account linked to anything professional I do in the future :p If a kid in my class can find it then someone else could as well Unless you're a really crappy poster, I wouldn't worry too much about employers finding your gaming forum account. Everyone got hobbies. Tbh, I'd be more worried about the flow in the opposite direction: some TL troll that finds your professional online presence could be pretty annoying if they so choose. | ||
|
Karis Vas Ryaar
United States4396 Posts
On May 06 2016 07:59 MysteryMeat1 wrote: If the blog post is old enough you can't edit it. It had my real name in there and I don't want this account linked to anything professional I do in the future :p If a kid in my class can find it then someone else could as well just pm a mod asking to edit it so you can. | ||
|
OtherWorld
France17333 Posts
On May 06 2016 08:15 Cascade wrote: Unless you're a really crappy poster, I wouldn't worry too much about employers finding your gaming forum account. Everyone got hobbies. Tbh, I'd be more worried about the flow in the opposite direction: some TL troll that finds your professional online presence could be pretty annoying if they so choose. No need to be a crappy poster, you just have to mention in some posts that you're browsing TL at work to be in trouble^^ | ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
On May 06 2016 16:14 OtherWorld wrote: No need to be a crappy poster, you just have to mention in some posts that you're browsing TL at work to be in trouble^^ In our office, it's sometimes hard to find someone who isn't browsing TL  However as scientists, we are judged by our results and publication output, not by how we spend every minute of our lives ... so I can slack for hours "at work" and then spend evenings and weekends neck deep in stupid errors in code. Honestly, I find this obsession with finding online dirt on people really puzzling. I know that HR can disfavour you just because of some stupid facebook shit ... but why? How on Earth is that their business? I am not even sure that it's legal (because at least in Europe, it is illegal to ask many sorts of personal questions during job interviews), but it happens all the time. I am so fucking happy that I don't have to play this stupid game - actually, I have to play another stupid game (grants, publications, points ...) but it's still much less stupid than normal recruiting. Thus, my real life is easily linkable to by online presence and I don't care. You can find my real name in ten seconds if you give it any try and as my real name is pretty unique and my work is by essence online, you can know everything you want very easily. | ||
|
OtherWorld
France17333 Posts
On May 06 2016 16:35 opisska wrote: In our office, it's sometimes hard to find someone who isn't browsing TL However as scientists, we are judged by our results and publication output, not by how we spend every minute of our lives ... so I can slack for hours "at work" and then spend evenings and weekends neck deep in stupid errors in code. Honestly, I find this obsession with finding online dirt on people really puzzling. I know that HR can disfavour you just because of some stupid facebook shit ... but why? How on Earth is that their business? I am not even sure that it's legal (because at least in Europe, it is illegal to ask many sorts of personal questions during job interviews), but it happens all the time. I am so fucking happy that I don't have to play this stupid game - actually, I have to play another stupid game (grants, publications, points ...) but it's still much less stupid than normal recruiting. Thus, my real life is easily linkable to by online presence and I don't care. You can find my real name in ten seconds if you give it any try and as my real name is pretty unique and my work is by essence online, you can know everything you want very easily. Well yeah, some jobs are more favored than others in that regard^^ And I agree about online stuff and recruiting, though if I was a recruiter I'm sure I'd do it, at least just to see is the appliant doesn't have heavily expressed extreme political views or bad behavior towards former employers. | ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
On May 06 2016 16:35 opisska wrote: In our office, it's sometimes hard to find someone who isn't browsing TL However as scientists, we are judged by our results and publication output, not by how we spend every minute of our lives ... so I can slack for hours "at work" and then spend evenings and weekends neck deep in stupid errors in code. Honestly, I find this obsession with finding online dirt on people really puzzling. I know that HR can disfavour you just because of some stupid facebook shit ... but why? How on Earth is that their business? I am not even sure that it's legal (because at least in Europe, it is illegal to ask many sorts of personal questions during job interviews), but it happens all the time. I am so fucking happy that I don't have to play this stupid game - actually, I have to play another stupid game (grants, publications, points ...) but it's still much less stupid than normal recruiting. Thus, my real life is easily linkable to by online presence and I don't care. You can find my real name in ten seconds if you give it any try and as my real name is pretty unique and my work is by essence online, you can know everything you want very easily. Yes, agreed. It's not a real problem (at least in research) that your potential employers go and dig up dirt on you on TL. The one thing that worries me a little bit is if someone on TL really hates someone and then dig up their twitter or other social media used professionally. They can then cause some significant embarrassment and in general be really annoying when you want to focus on networking. I've seen it a couple of times, and even though everyone knows that it is the stalker that's the idiot, I can still see how an employer maybe would think twice if there is another similarly skilled candidate. What do you think? | ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
On May 06 2016 17:26 Cascade wrote: Yes, agreed. It's not a real problem (at least in research) that your potential employers go and dig up dirt on you on TL. The one thing that worries me a little bit is if someone on TL really hates someone and then dig up their twitter or other social media used professionally. They can then cause some significant embarrassment and in general be really annoying when you want to focus on networking. I've seen it a couple of times, and even though everyone knows that it is the stalker that's the idiot, I can still see how an employer maybe would think twice if there is another similarly skilled candidate. What do you think? I really don't do "networking", so I dunno But can't you just block the annoying person on most social networks? In any case, if I were a recruiter, I wouldn't pay much attention to this stuff, knowing how skewed view of reality it presents. In general, I would really like to see more rationality in ... everything, ergo also in evaluation social media information. If everyone knows that it's the stalkers fault, everyone should act like that. Surely, there is this "similarly skilled" problem, but does that really happen so often, if the evaluation isn't really shallow? From my personal experience, people are really different from each other. But then again, I have zero experience with non-academic jobs. Here recruitment is more like dating - both sides realize that it's a great match and then the deal is sealed. But even again, I know that this is not the case even in academia in other fields or countries. | ||
|
Heartland
Sweden24593 Posts
On May 06 2016 16:35 opisska wrote: In our office, it's sometimes hard to find someone who isn't browsing TL However as scientists, we are judged by our results and publication output, not by how we spend every minute of our lives ... so I can slack for hours "at work" and then spend evenings and weekends neck deep in stupid errors in code. Honestly, I find this obsession with finding online dirt on people really puzzling. I know that HR can disfavour you just because of some stupid facebook shit ... but why? How on Earth is that their business? I am not even sure that it's legal (because at least in Europe, it is illegal to ask many sorts of personal questions during job interviews), but it happens all the time. I am so fucking happy that I don't have to play this stupid game - actually, I have to play another stupid game (grants, publications, points ...) but it's still much less stupid than normal recruiting. Thus, my real life is easily linkable to by online presence and I don't care. You can find my real name in ten seconds if you give it any try and as my real name is pretty unique and my work is by essence online, you can know everything you want very easily. are you saying your real name is not opisska? Have you been lying to us all this time? /H. Eart Land the III | ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
On May 06 2016 18:26 Heartland wrote: are you saying your real name is not opisska? Have you been lying to us all this time? /H. Eart Land the III Funnily enough, while most people probably use the online nickname as a shortcut, my real full name is one letter shorter (or the same length, because I'd have to type the space anyway). Or it may turn out that everyone else used the same naming convention as Heartland, poor Fecalfeast though. | ||
|
Heartland
Sweden24593 Posts
On May 06 2016 18:30 opisska wrote: Funnily enough, while most people probably use the online nickname as a shortcut, my real full name is one letter shorter (or the same length, because I'd have to type the space anyway). Or it may turn out that everyone else used the same naming convention as Heartland, poor Fecalfeast though. His parents just followed the boy named Sue convention | ||
|
brian
United States9639 Posts
| ||
|
Skynx
Turkey7150 Posts
| ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
On May 06 2016 17:33 opisska wrote: I really don't do "networking", so I dunno But can't you just block the annoying person on most social networks? In any case, if I were a recruiter, I wouldn't pay much attention to this stuff, knowing how skewed view of reality it presents. In general, I would really like to see more rationality in ... everything, ergo also in evaluation social media information. If everyone knows that it's the stalkers fault, everyone should act like that. Surely, there is this "similarly skilled" problem, but does that really happen so often, if the evaluation isn't really shallow? From my personal experience, people are really different from each other. But then again, I have zero experience with non-academic jobs. Here recruitment is more like dating - both sides realize that it's a great match and then the deal is sealed. But even again, I know that this is not the case even in academia in other fields or countries.I'm in academia as well, and you are right that it's probably not a big deal. I'm networking a fair bit on Twitter myself, it's a good way to stay connected with overseas community seeing that I don't get funding for EU/US conferences often in Au... Even if I can block stalkers, it'd give a bad impression to others that don't know me, or so I imagine. But yeah, probably not a big deal. Actually I'm thinking twice before posting this already, as I'm sure you can track down my name and Twitter from my post history... :o hopefully unmotivated... | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18246 Posts
On May 07 2016 06:53 Cascade wrote: hopefully unmotivated... famous last words. BRB. Googling cascade the physicist. | ||
|
MysteryMeat1
United States3292 Posts
| ||
| ||
