EPTOh lol. Didn't saw i misstyped :p
The Automated Ban List - Page 2336
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
FFW_Rude
France10201 Posts
Oh lol. Didn't saw i misstyped :p | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
On August 19 2014 04:48 Roswell wrote: Yeah its hard to think for yourself. I bet you worship that big gold arrow on the floor telling you exactly where to go in a first person shooter. You need comedy central to reinforce your pathetically small political viewpoint. Since day 1 the facts have been pointing away from this poor innocent young man being just that. But it wont matter, in two years you'll joke to your friends about this incident and read what you want to read. Good riddance to me im out, I said that so you wouldnt have to. User was temp banned for this post. I was hoping for something a bit more tin foil hat like than this. | ||
The_Templar
your Country52798 Posts
Nice icon Edit so nobody has to look for it ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/Nxv6Gyk.png) | ||
|
IgnE
United States7684 Posts
On August 19 2014 05:02 ThomasjServo wrote: I was hoping for something a bit more tin foil hat like than this. Yeah well it's hard to tell if he's very stupid or just very careless because his posts are so incoherent. | ||
Darkhorse
United States23455 Posts
| ||
lichter
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
| ||
|
Caihead
Canada8550 Posts
On August 18 2014 07:27 ninazerg wrote: Okay, I hoped I would never have to post in this thread, but I need to address something here. You are calling someone "Literally human trash". Think about that for a second. The main complaint against Shauni is that he is perceived to be a misogynist of sorts. So if I were to assume you carry this belief that A. Shauni is a misogynist, and B. misogyny is wrong because it is a dehumanization of women, then you're doing exactly what you're against, which is dehumanizing a human being. If you are to say "Well, he deserves it", then you have to ask yourself: why does anyone deserve anything bad in retaliation for immoral or unethical statements or actions? There is really no reason, but I understand these sorts of issues carry a lot of emotional weight. To my knowledge, Shauni has not said anything to the effect of "Women are human trash", but has been critical of the way modern society has conditioned the women he's known to behave. Or maybe he could have been referring to the fact that A. Shauni doesn't learn from his mistakes. B. Shauni doesn't want to admit his problems. C. Shauni has been on this site for literally more than a decade and has been doing the same thing. What Shauni specifically posts really has nothing to do with why he got banned, it's the fact that he never tries to redeem himself or improve. Instead consciously choosing to post in a way that any human being would have noticed incites negative emotions from his fellow TL-ers. I know this because he frequently responds to responses on his comments. "Why does anyone deserve anything bad in retaliation for immoral or unethical statements or actions?" What? That's the whole point behind social construct of penalty, justice, and even rehabilitation. Rehabilitation involves taking away certain privileges and the innate recognition of mistakes, even in the most liberally realized places like Norway you still get sent to community service and jail for doing bad things because you want to deter immoral behavior and promote moral behavior. If you really believe that then why aren't you arguing against mods banning people from TL, because obviously that's also something bad in retaliation for unethical statements or actions. | ||
|
cLAN.Anax
United States2847 Posts
| ||
|
lichter
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
| ||
|
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
| ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
| ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
On August 19 2014 18:38 opisska wrote: While banning Shauni is the (second) most natural, logical and expected thing event in the modern history of TL, it doesn't really solve anything and only makes the underlying problem more apparent. Even people who otherwise seem to be perfectly reasonable when posting about almost every other thing (except maybe international politics) regularly describe their relations with women in absurdly outrageous ways without even realizing that there is something wrong (not even when explicitly pointed out to them). I honestly can't figure out if this is some specific aura of TL attracting the weirdest kinds of people or if this "culture" exists everywhere outside my carefully selected bubble of non-idiotic friends. The only thing I can say for sure that from TL perspective, Shauni (however I may have disliked him) was just sitting on the top of a very flat iceberg, whose volume and shape is not really changed by blowing off an erratic snowflake from it. See right now it is all being relatively contained in the Dating Thread. I think of it like the containment unit from Ghostbusters. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/YIIu0c6.png) | ||
|
lichter
1001 YEARS KESPAJAIL22272 Posts
takes a toll on your sanity | ||
|
c0ldfusion
United States8293 Posts
On August 19 2014 18:38 opisska wrote: While banning Shauni is the (second) most natural, logical and expected thing event in the modern history of TL, it doesn't really solve anything and only makes the underlying problem more apparent. Even people who otherwise seem to be perfectly reasonable when posting about almost every other thing (except maybe international politics) regularly describe their relations with women in absurdly outrageous ways without even realizing that there is something wrong (not even when explicitly pointed out to them). I honestly can't figure out if this is some specific aura of TL attracting the weirdest kinds of people or if this "culture" exists everywhere outside my carefully selected bubble of non-idiotic friends. The only thing I can say for sure that from TL perspective, Shauni (however I may have disliked him) was just sitting on the top of a very flat iceberg, whose volume and shape is not really changed by blowing off an erratic snowflake from it. That was... poetic. ::slow clap:: | ||
|
c0ldfusion
United States8293 Posts
On August 19 2014 14:32 lichter wrote: i'm actually worried for Shauni now that he doesn't have TL to tell him to stop sniffing girls' jackets Ah yes, the downside of casting aside a community member. Sometimes, they need the guidance from the collective will of TL. | ||
dravernor
Netherlands6192 Posts
On August 19 2014 18:38 opisska wrote: While banning Shauni is the (second) most natural, logical and expected thing event in the modern history of TL, it doesn't really solve anything and only makes the underlying problem more apparent. Even people who otherwise seem to be perfectly reasonable when posting about almost every other thing (except maybe international politics) regularly describe their relations with women in absurdly outrageous ways without even realizing that there is something wrong (not even when explicitly pointed out to them). I honestly can't figure out if this is some specific aura of TL attracting the weirdest kinds of people or if this "culture" exists everywhere outside my carefully selected bubble of non-idiotic friends. The only thing I can say for sure that from TL perspective, Shauni (however I may have disliked him) was just sitting on the top of a very flat iceberg, whose volume and shape is not really changed by blowing off an erratic snowflake from it. I liked that. | ||
|
Skynx
Turkey7150 Posts
On August 18 2014 07:32 Socup wrote: the macro mechanics chrono inject and mule have been problems from day 1, and I think protoss as a race exemplifies it. There's only one or two semi-valid early aggro openings for T, and as players get better, even those holes close. Eventually the Protoss all ins early game will close by Terrans going for "safer" builds, but these builds will have to be nearly identical, setting up their midgame for a playstyle they didn't want, while also giving free reign for protoss to FE and get a huge economy early, and Terran has no response. Zerg is largely immune to this because the hatches and injects being able to overdrone after shutting down an all in, or the fact that Zerg has closed the holes in the timings means that Protoss no longer even try vs Zerg, which means there's no making early units for Zerg to begin with. When I look up Brood War builds, there's an entire Page full of 1 base aggressions, 1 base all ins, 2 base aggressions, "macro heavy" builds, and so on. Expanding is extremely rewarding in this game because of how fast the "macro" mechanics translate expansions into an accelerating growth of economy. The largest issue here, being, of course, the ease as buying units, since the cost strucure of units is almost completely the same as it was in Brood War. Marines, zerglings, dragoons, stalkers, zealots, etc. It's a lot easier to buy those stalkers which have better pathing, extra abilities, and so on in SC2 than it is to buy goons in SC1. As long as the cost structure of units takes so much advantage from the "new and improved 'macro' mechanic" of SC2, things will be stale and the Protoss will have this "book of bullshit". Protoss can FE, poke, and be immune to early game attack or retaliation from Terran, and Zerg to a lesser extent. The game doesn't feel dynamic and strategic, they make it feel like Checkers or Tic tac Toe. Where's the spectator FUN in watching people do no attacks early game or watching the same zealot/stalker/MSC poke every single game where it doesn't really do anything if the other player beats them off, while both of them FE as "standard" and nothing happens for a few minutes because macro mechanics make grabbing bases far more important than trying to attack your opponent for the first 10 minutes? User was warned for this post for explaining why the Protoss book of bullshit exists and being on topic and I just have a bug up my ass User was temp banned for this post. + Show Spoiler + On August 19 2014 07:21 Socup wrote: When's the last time an early game protoss all in has killed a zerg in pro play? Funny stuff. Any macro build has within them designs to hold off early game aggression because there's no point in going macro if you just straight up die to some early game aggression or all in every time, and because of that, because of the exponential rewards of going macro, the person who goes macro and gets "more stuff" and holds off that all in has basically won right then and there. Unless the other player was Protoss of course. User was warned for this post hahah, I love these species that have no sense of gettin rekt and just keep going | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
User was warned for this post for explaining why the Protoss book of bullshit exists and being on topic and I just have a bug up my ass User was temp banned for this post. I love what I assume is the edited mod note. | ||
|
Skynx
Turkey7150 Posts
 | ||
|
GeckoXp
Germany2016 Posts
On August 19 2014 14:01 Caihead wrote: What Shauni specifically posts really has nothing to do with why he got banned, it's the fact that he never tries to redeem himself or improve Let me rephrase, What X specifically posts has nothing to do with the ban, it's what he posts. That's what you wrote That's the whole point behind social construct of penalty, justice, and even rehabilitation. None of the above uses retaliation. Help me to understand this thread, I clearly don't. | ||
| ||
