|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On September 12 2012 14:04 neoghaleon55 wrote:I'm surprised nobody has talked about FATJESUSONABIKE's ban yet. His lifespan on teamliquid is like a little gift from baby jesus...so full of lols. good riddance. Show nested quote +On September 11 2012 19:21 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
get out NaNiWa :-)
User was warned for this post Show nested quote +On September 06 2012 18:46 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
OH MY GOD HE BUILT A PYLON BEHIND THE FOG IN HIS BASE LOOOOL MAP AWARENESS SO AWESOME SO MILES ABOVE OTHER PLAYERS
User was warned for this post Show nested quote +On August 16 2012 20:58 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
p
r
o
t
o
s
s
User was warned for this post Show nested quote +On July 07 2012 16:46 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:On July 06 2012 22:54 Yonnua wrote:On July 06 2012 22:35 bgx wrote:On July 06 2012 21:57 Yonnua wrote:On July 06 2012 20:12 Grumbels wrote:
That's funny, I've read so many posts by BW fans claiming that DRG's 350+ apm is a joke compared to the BW players'. DRG had 650ish sc2 apm at MLG... which is about 900 Brood war APM, so... I think you read some statistics wrong. Or you mean spike apm, which imho is weirdly calculated in sc2 because ive seen many people already beating July BW record multiple times during normal sc2 micro. I'm talking about a couple minute long spike late game where he was multitasking and microing a few battles at once. so... much.... stupidity.... can't... breathe.... anymore User was warned for this post Show nested quote +On May 11 2012 01:43 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
thank yu blizzard for balancing the game by making it less diverse.
good way to go, dumbf*cks :-)
User was warned for this post Show nested quote +On February 24 2012 21:41 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
9 games, 8 protoss wins. only 'alien' win was a TvT. P has been looking ridiculously strong ever since the immortal/forgeupgr buffs, not to mention it's undeniably always been the most boring of races gameplay-wise. you're the joke.
User was temp banned for this post. Show nested quote +On June 13 2012 23:35 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
Hearing David Kim say he wants Terran to have less-micro intensive units and, I quote, 'more a-moving friendly stuff' before refuting that he does want to make the game more casual is actually scandalous. What a low-life manipulative little dumbass.
User was temp banned for this post. Show nested quote +On July 31 2012 17:52 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
how many more teams is he going to let down?
naniwa is such an eternal shithead, i definitely hate this guy.
User was temp banned for this post. Show nested quote +On August 19 2012 02:46 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
I'm starting to get sickened by Zergs winning with 50eapm appart from efficient macro against mechanically ultra-gifted Terrans who split, macro, micro, make tons of control groups and play perfectly.
There's an issue with this match-up, when average newbs like VortiX and Slivko throw away dozens of units and still manage to a-move to a scandalous victory, there's a fucking issue.
User was temp banned for this post. Show nested quote +On August 28 2012 21:46 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:On August 28 2012 21:42 FataLe wrote:On August 28 2012 21:41 Waxangel wrote:
there was a moment in the last fight where san could have forcefired a clump of vikings with his archons, which could have saved his colossis and salvaged the game, who knows This was fustrating to watch as a Protoss player. I was constantly agitated at San's 1 aness. grrr. could have saved so manymore collossus. as if all protosses didn't constantly 1a. User was temp banned for this post. Show nested quote +On September 12 2012 03:03 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:On September 10 2012 21:14 Evangelist wrote:
The only condition that a unit requires for inclusion in a game is that it has substantive differences than another unit. That is why a battlecruiser and a marine are able to co-exist despite arguably being comparable to each other (terrans only have two low damage rapid fire units). The only problem with the warhound is that it overlaps far too much with the marauder and at the same time is also better than the marauder. This is due to the following reasons:
- it costs the same supply and only slightly higher amounts of resources
- it is more mobile
- it carries improved damage against nearly all of the opponents a marauder is expected to face
- it has a longer range
- it has higher HP
- it can be mass repaired
So for the same supply you get improved damage, longer range, more mobility, high survivability and the ability to be repaired. It is even larger, so it suffers less from siege tank fire.
There were plenty of overlapping units in BW. This constant harping on about the reaver and the dragoon and so on - there was nothing particularly special about the dragoon or the vulture or lurkers. Lurkers were just immobile hellions. Dragoons were just stalkers with a bit more damage. The vulture doesn't even have the micro of the hellion for gods sake.
The only unit people keep going on about is the reaver. Well you know what? I've had it with the reaver. I'm going to call it what it was. It was a complete design failure. It was a stupid unit that couldn't survive without entire tactics being based around its use. It was slow, buggy and looked ridiculous. There was no micro involved in the reaver without the use of shuttles. It lagged a mile behind every other unit, it required extra building micro in a game already overloaded with it. What's more, it was a dumb fire unit - it just did splash damage in a game completely overloaded with splash damage
The reaver epitomised everything that was wrong with BW design. It epitomised everything people misunderstand about system design. The colossus is a far better unit. woooooooooooat? that is some gross, gross and disgusting reasoning sir. and your nickname LOL, what flaw don't you have? User was banned for this post. Show nested quote +FATJESUSONABIKE was just banned by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2011-11-14 21:22:16 and had 184 posts.
Reason: Ten actions in less than 200 posts. Goodbye.
Yeah, I think we were all secretly happy about that one. Not only for the bad post history, but also I hate when people name themselves in all caps.
|
On September 12 2012 14:49 Fionn wrote:
Yonghwa just got another loss on his match records. He might have got 0-2'ed instead of 1-2'ed. Still is out.
User was warned for not only getting predictions wrong, but actual results wrong.
A very humorous warning 
|
On September 12 2012 14:04 neoghaleon55 wrote:I'm surprised nobody has talked about FATJESUSONABIKE's ban yet. His lifespan on teamliquid is like a little gift from baby jesus...so full of lols. good riddance. Show nested quote +On September 11 2012 19:21 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
get out NaNiWa :-)
User was warned for this post Show nested quote +On September 06 2012 18:46 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
OH MY GOD HE BUILT A PYLON BEHIND THE FOG IN HIS BASE LOOOOL MAP AWARENESS SO AWESOME SO MILES ABOVE OTHER PLAYERS
User was warned for this post Show nested quote +On August 16 2012 20:58 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
p
r
o
t
o
s
s
User was warned for this post Show nested quote +On July 07 2012 16:46 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:On July 06 2012 22:54 Yonnua wrote:On July 06 2012 22:35 bgx wrote:On July 06 2012 21:57 Yonnua wrote:On July 06 2012 20:12 Grumbels wrote:
That's funny, I've read so many posts by BW fans claiming that DRG's 350+ apm is a joke compared to the BW players'. DRG had 650ish sc2 apm at MLG... which is about 900 Brood war APM, so... I think you read some statistics wrong. Or you mean spike apm, which imho is weirdly calculated in sc2 because ive seen many people already beating July BW record multiple times during normal sc2 micro. I'm talking about a couple minute long spike late game where he was multitasking and microing a few battles at once. so... much.... stupidity.... can't... breathe.... anymore User was warned for this post Show nested quote +On May 11 2012 01:43 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
thank yu blizzard for balancing the game by making it less diverse.
good way to go, dumbf*cks :-)
User was warned for this post Show nested quote +On February 24 2012 21:41 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
9 games, 8 protoss wins. only 'alien' win was a TvT. P has been looking ridiculously strong ever since the immortal/forgeupgr buffs, not to mention it's undeniably always been the most boring of races gameplay-wise. you're the joke.
User was temp banned for this post. Show nested quote +On June 13 2012 23:35 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
Hearing David Kim say he wants Terran to have less-micro intensive units and, I quote, 'more a-moving friendly stuff' before refuting that he does want to make the game more casual is actually scandalous. What a low-life manipulative little dumbass.
User was temp banned for this post. Show nested quote +On July 31 2012 17:52 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
how many more teams is he going to let down?
naniwa is such an eternal shithead, i definitely hate this guy.
User was temp banned for this post. Show nested quote +On August 19 2012 02:46 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
I'm starting to get sickened by Zergs winning with 50eapm appart from efficient macro against mechanically ultra-gifted Terrans who split, macro, micro, make tons of control groups and play perfectly.
There's an issue with this match-up, when average newbs like VortiX and Slivko throw away dozens of units and still manage to a-move to a scandalous victory, there's a fucking issue.
User was temp banned for this post. Show nested quote +On August 28 2012 21:46 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:On August 28 2012 21:42 FataLe wrote:On August 28 2012 21:41 Waxangel wrote:
there was a moment in the last fight where san could have forcefired a clump of vikings with his archons, which could have saved his colossis and salvaged the game, who knows This was fustrating to watch as a Protoss player. I was constantly agitated at San's 1 aness. grrr. could have saved so manymore collossus. as if all protosses didn't constantly 1a. User was temp banned for this post. Show nested quote +On September 12 2012 03:03 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:On September 10 2012 21:14 Evangelist wrote:
The only condition that a unit requires for inclusion in a game is that it has substantive differences than another unit. That is why a battlecruiser and a marine are able to co-exist despite arguably being comparable to each other (terrans only have two low damage rapid fire units). The only problem with the warhound is that it overlaps far too much with the marauder and at the same time is also better than the marauder. This is due to the following reasons:
- it costs the same supply and only slightly higher amounts of resources
- it is more mobile
- it carries improved damage against nearly all of the opponents a marauder is expected to face
- it has a longer range
- it has higher HP
- it can be mass repaired
So for the same supply you get improved damage, longer range, more mobility, high survivability and the ability to be repaired. It is even larger, so it suffers less from siege tank fire.
There were plenty of overlapping units in BW. This constant harping on about the reaver and the dragoon and so on - there was nothing particularly special about the dragoon or the vulture or lurkers. Lurkers were just immobile hellions. Dragoons were just stalkers with a bit more damage. The vulture doesn't even have the micro of the hellion for gods sake.
The only unit people keep going on about is the reaver. Well you know what? I've had it with the reaver. I'm going to call it what it was. It was a complete design failure. It was a stupid unit that couldn't survive without entire tactics being based around its use. It was slow, buggy and looked ridiculous. There was no micro involved in the reaver without the use of shuttles. It lagged a mile behind every other unit, it required extra building micro in a game already overloaded with it. What's more, it was a dumb fire unit - it just did splash damage in a game completely overloaded with splash damage
The reaver epitomised everything that was wrong with BW design. It epitomised everything people misunderstand about system design. The colossus is a far better unit. woooooooooooat? that is some gross, gross and disgusting reasoning sir. and your nickname LOL, what flaw don't you have? User was banned for this post. Show nested quote +FATJESUSONABIKE was just banned by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2011-11-14 21:22:16 and had 184 posts.
Reason: Ten actions in less than 200 posts. Goodbye.
It's amazing he lasted as long as he did really.
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37107 Posts
I don't understand why he chose such a name...
The hell kind of picture are we supposed to paint when someone names themselves FATJESUSONABIKE?
|
On September 12 2012 08:06 Cornstyle wrote:Show nested quote +NEEDZMOAR was just temp banned for 30 days by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2011-12-14 01:16:12 and had 185 posts.
Reason: You know what's great? Celebrating events where hundreds died tragically. Do you also celebrate the holocaust with cake, or is it reserved only for some massacres where hundreds of civilians are brutally murdered? Woohoo, first report leading to a ban! Granted it was an easy one cause the guy is a dick but still...
The real question here is, why was it only 30 days for something like that?
|
ihatezerg was just temp banned for 1 week by EvilTeletubby.
That account was created on 2012-06-09 08:22:21 and had 26 posts.
Reason: You have raged out TWICE now on two separate members of the moderation team when you had your shit-fest excuse for threads closed. And even when you did get a thread going, you were still a sarcastic douche in a majority of your replies.
Tone down the hostility or we will remove you permanently.
I find this hilarious, I just wish I would get to see the rage as well :p
|
On September 12 2012 14:45 TheAmazombie wrote:Show nested quote +On September 12 2012 14:04 neoghaleon55 wrote:I'm surprised nobody has talked about FATJESUSONABIKE's ban yet. His lifespan on teamliquid is like a little gift from baby jesus...so full of lols. good riddance. On September 11 2012 19:21 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
get out NaNiWa :-)
User was warned for this post On September 06 2012 18:46 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
OH MY GOD HE BUILT A PYLON BEHIND THE FOG IN HIS BASE LOOOOL MAP AWARENESS SO AWESOME SO MILES ABOVE OTHER PLAYERS
User was warned for this post On August 16 2012 20:58 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
p
r
o
t
o
s
s
User was warned for this post On July 07 2012 16:46 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:On July 06 2012 22:54 Yonnua wrote:On July 06 2012 22:35 bgx wrote:On July 06 2012 21:57 Yonnua wrote:On July 06 2012 20:12 Grumbels wrote:
That's funny, I've read so many posts by BW fans claiming that DRG's 350+ apm is a joke compared to the BW players'. DRG had 650ish sc2 apm at MLG... which is about 900 Brood war APM, so... I think you read some statistics wrong. Or you mean spike apm, which imho is weirdly calculated in sc2 because ive seen many people already beating July BW record multiple times during normal sc2 micro. I'm talking about a couple minute long spike late game where he was multitasking and microing a few battles at once. so... much.... stupidity.... can't... breathe.... anymore User was warned for this post On May 11 2012 01:43 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
thank yu blizzard for balancing the game by making it less diverse.
good way to go, dumbf*cks :-)
User was warned for this post On February 24 2012 21:41 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
9 games, 8 protoss wins. only 'alien' win was a TvT. P has been looking ridiculously strong ever since the immortal/forgeupgr buffs, not to mention it's undeniably always been the most boring of races gameplay-wise. you're the joke.
User was temp banned for this post. On June 13 2012 23:35 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
Hearing David Kim say he wants Terran to have less-micro intensive units and, I quote, 'more a-moving friendly stuff' before refuting that he does want to make the game more casual is actually scandalous. What a low-life manipulative little dumbass.
User was temp banned for this post. On July 31 2012 17:52 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
how many more teams is he going to let down?
naniwa is such an eternal shithead, i definitely hate this guy.
User was temp banned for this post. On August 19 2012 02:46 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
I'm starting to get sickened by Zergs winning with 50eapm appart from efficient macro against mechanically ultra-gifted Terrans who split, macro, micro, make tons of control groups and play perfectly.
There's an issue with this match-up, when average newbs like VortiX and Slivko throw away dozens of units and still manage to a-move to a scandalous victory, there's a fucking issue.
User was temp banned for this post. On August 28 2012 21:46 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:On August 28 2012 21:42 FataLe wrote:On August 28 2012 21:41 Waxangel wrote:
there was a moment in the last fight where san could have forcefired a clump of vikings with his archons, which could have saved his colossis and salvaged the game, who knows This was fustrating to watch as a Protoss player. I was constantly agitated at San's 1 aness. grrr. could have saved so manymore collossus. as if all protosses didn't constantly 1a. User was temp banned for this post. On September 12 2012 03:03 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:On September 10 2012 21:14 Evangelist wrote:
The only condition that a unit requires for inclusion in a game is that it has substantive differences than another unit. That is why a battlecruiser and a marine are able to co-exist despite arguably being comparable to each other (terrans only have two low damage rapid fire units). The only problem with the warhound is that it overlaps far too much with the marauder and at the same time is also better than the marauder. This is due to the following reasons:
- it costs the same supply and only slightly higher amounts of resources
- it is more mobile
- it carries improved damage against nearly all of the opponents a marauder is expected to face
- it has a longer range
- it has higher HP
- it can be mass repaired
So for the same supply you get improved damage, longer range, more mobility, high survivability and the ability to be repaired. It is even larger, so it suffers less from siege tank fire.
There were plenty of overlapping units in BW. This constant harping on about the reaver and the dragoon and so on - there was nothing particularly special about the dragoon or the vulture or lurkers. Lurkers were just immobile hellions. Dragoons were just stalkers with a bit more damage. The vulture doesn't even have the micro of the hellion for gods sake.
The only unit people keep going on about is the reaver. Well you know what? I've had it with the reaver. I'm going to call it what it was. It was a complete design failure. It was a stupid unit that couldn't survive without entire tactics being based around its use. It was slow, buggy and looked ridiculous. There was no micro involved in the reaver without the use of shuttles. It lagged a mile behind every other unit, it required extra building micro in a game already overloaded with it. What's more, it was a dumb fire unit - it just did splash damage in a game completely overloaded with splash damage
The reaver epitomised everything that was wrong with BW design. It epitomised everything people misunderstand about system design. The colossus is a far better unit. woooooooooooat? that is some gross, gross and disgusting reasoning sir. and your nickname LOL, what flaw don't you have? User was banned for this post. FATJESUSONABIKE was just banned by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2011-11-14 21:22:16 and had 184 posts.
Reason: Ten actions in less than 200 posts. Goodbye. Yeah, I think we were all secretly happy about that one. Not only for the bad post history, but also I hate when people name themselves in all caps.
imo his name was enough to warrant a ban or at least force him to change, unnecessarely provocating.
On September 12 2012 15:57 SeeKeR wrote:
I don't understand why he chose such a name...
The hell kind of picture are we supposed to paint when someone names themselves FATJESUSONABIKE?
A douche or a retard ?
|
On September 12 2012 19:49 sAsImre wrote:Show nested quote +On September 12 2012 14:45 TheAmazombie wrote:On September 12 2012 14:04 neoghaleon55 wrote:I'm surprised nobody has talked about FATJESUSONABIKE's ban yet. His lifespan on teamliquid is like a little gift from baby jesus...so full of lols. good riddance. On September 11 2012 19:21 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
get out NaNiWa :-)
User was warned for this post On September 06 2012 18:46 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
OH MY GOD HE BUILT A PYLON BEHIND THE FOG IN HIS BASE LOOOOL MAP AWARENESS SO AWESOME SO MILES ABOVE OTHER PLAYERS
User was warned for this post On August 16 2012 20:58 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
p
r
o
t
o
s
s
User was warned for this post On July 07 2012 16:46 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:On July 06 2012 22:54 Yonnua wrote:On July 06 2012 22:35 bgx wrote:On July 06 2012 21:57 Yonnua wrote:On July 06 2012 20:12 Grumbels wrote:
That's funny, I've read so many posts by BW fans claiming that DRG's 350+ apm is a joke compared to the BW players'. DRG had 650ish sc2 apm at MLG... which is about 900 Brood war APM, so... I think you read some statistics wrong. Or you mean spike apm, which imho is weirdly calculated in sc2 because ive seen many people already beating July BW record multiple times during normal sc2 micro. I'm talking about a couple minute long spike late game where he was multitasking and microing a few battles at once. so... much.... stupidity.... can't... breathe.... anymore User was warned for this post On May 11 2012 01:43 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
thank yu blizzard for balancing the game by making it less diverse.
good way to go, dumbf*cks :-)
User was warned for this post On February 24 2012 21:41 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
9 games, 8 protoss wins. only 'alien' win was a TvT. P has been looking ridiculously strong ever since the immortal/forgeupgr buffs, not to mention it's undeniably always been the most boring of races gameplay-wise. you're the joke.
User was temp banned for this post. On June 13 2012 23:35 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
Hearing David Kim say he wants Terran to have less-micro intensive units and, I quote, 'more a-moving friendly stuff' before refuting that he does want to make the game more casual is actually scandalous. What a low-life manipulative little dumbass.
User was temp banned for this post. On July 31 2012 17:52 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
how many more teams is he going to let down?
naniwa is such an eternal shithead, i definitely hate this guy.
User was temp banned for this post. On August 19 2012 02:46 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:
I'm starting to get sickened by Zergs winning with 50eapm appart from efficient macro against mechanically ultra-gifted Terrans who split, macro, micro, make tons of control groups and play perfectly.
There's an issue with this match-up, when average newbs like VortiX and Slivko throw away dozens of units and still manage to a-move to a scandalous victory, there's a fucking issue.
User was temp banned for this post. On August 28 2012 21:46 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:On August 28 2012 21:42 FataLe wrote:On August 28 2012 21:41 Waxangel wrote:
there was a moment in the last fight where san could have forcefired a clump of vikings with his archons, which could have saved his colossis and salvaged the game, who knows This was fustrating to watch as a Protoss player. I was constantly agitated at San's 1 aness. grrr. could have saved so manymore collossus. as if all protosses didn't constantly 1a. User was temp banned for this post. On September 12 2012 03:03 FATJESUSONABIKE wrote:On September 10 2012 21:14 Evangelist wrote:
The only condition that a unit requires for inclusion in a game is that it has substantive differences than another unit. That is why a battlecruiser and a marine are able to co-exist despite arguably being comparable to each other (terrans only have two low damage rapid fire units). The only problem with the warhound is that it overlaps far too much with the marauder and at the same time is also better than the marauder. This is due to the following reasons:
- it costs the same supply and only slightly higher amounts of resources
- it is more mobile
- it carries improved damage against nearly all of the opponents a marauder is expected to face
- it has a longer range
- it has higher HP
- it can be mass repaired
So for the same supply you get improved damage, longer range, more mobility, high survivability and the ability to be repaired. It is even larger, so it suffers less from siege tank fire.
There were plenty of overlapping units in BW. This constant harping on about the reaver and the dragoon and so on - there was nothing particularly special about the dragoon or the vulture or lurkers. Lurkers were just immobile hellions. Dragoons were just stalkers with a bit more damage. The vulture doesn't even have the micro of the hellion for gods sake.
The only unit people keep going on about is the reaver. Well you know what? I've had it with the reaver. I'm going to call it what it was. It was a complete design failure. It was a stupid unit that couldn't survive without entire tactics being based around its use. It was slow, buggy and looked ridiculous. There was no micro involved in the reaver without the use of shuttles. It lagged a mile behind every other unit, it required extra building micro in a game already overloaded with it. What's more, it was a dumb fire unit - it just did splash damage in a game completely overloaded with splash damage
The reaver epitomised everything that was wrong with BW design. It epitomised everything people misunderstand about system design. The colossus is a far better unit. woooooooooooat? that is some gross, gross and disgusting reasoning sir. and your nickname LOL, what flaw don't you have? User was banned for this post. FATJESUSONABIKE was just banned by GMarshal.
That account was created on 2011-11-14 21:22:16 and had 184 posts.
Reason: Ten actions in less than 200 posts. Goodbye. Yeah, I think we were all secretly happy about that one. Not only for the bad post history, but also I hate when people name themselves in all caps. imo his name was enough to warrant a ban or at least force him to change, unnecessarely provocating. Show nested quote +On September 12 2012 15:57 SeeKeR wrote:
I don't understand why he chose such a name...
The hell kind of picture are we supposed to paint when someone names themselves FATJESUSONABIKE? A douche or a retard ?
That sounds unnecessarily harsh and presumptuous. Not that I was ever a fan of the guy or anything but damn... Sure he has proven you right this time but it's not a good mindset toi have if you ask me. 
DustinBieber was just banned by TheMango.
That account was created on 2012-09-12 17:32:04 and had 1 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user.
Haha I'm genuinely surprised this ID was not already taken. o.0
|
I just got my report button. I don't have to PM mods anymore. This just got a lot easier; I feel as is a gun has been placed in my hand.
... I'm scared. 
|
Oh that Libya thread...turned from a political discussion to a religious discussion.
|
On September 12 2012 20:59 scFoX wrote:I just got my report button. I don't have to PM mods anymore. This just got a lot easier; I feel as is a gun has been placed in my hand. ... I'm scared.
Don't worry, as long as you're just genuinely trying to help the staff get rid of inadequate posting and don't abuse the system I don't think anyone will mind if you make a couple of mistakes here or there. ^^
|
|
|
I hope they ban GT3 soon or people are going to get really mad in that thread.
User was warned for this post
|
United Kingdom14464 Posts
On September 12 2012 20:08 MasterOfPuppets wrote:Show nested quote +DustinBieber was just banned by TheMango.
That account was created on 2012-09-12 17:32:04 and had 1 posts.
Reason: Previously banned user. Haha I'm genuinely surprised this ID was not already taken. o.0
I'm damn disappointed that his ID has gone to waste, I find that name hilarious, I'd giggle everytime DustinBieber posts.
|
Oh, wow.
On September 13 2012 01:45 TL.net Bot wrote:
Belial88 was just banned by semioldguy.
That account was created on 2010-11-07 17:13:15 and had 4302 posts.
Reason: You make a huge post to bash someone and combined with your seemingly endless moderation history, it appears you do not learn from your warnings and bans. Your last chance has been used. Goodbye.
Not sure what else to add, didn't see that perm coming.
Edit: To clarify (not worth another post) when I saw the ban, I wasn't expecting it to be a perm.
|
On September 13 2012 01:46 Iyerbeth wrote:Oh, wow. Show nested quote +On September 13 2012 01:45 TL.net Bot wrote:
Belial88 was just banned by semioldguy.
That account was created on 2010-11-07 17:13:15 and had 4302 posts.
Reason: You make a huge post to bash someone and combined with your seemingly endless moderation history, it appears you do not learn from your warnings and bans. Your last chance has been used. Goodbye. Not sure what else to add, didn't see that perm coming.
I did, guy was getting banned pretty often. Anyone know the "huge post to bash someone" he was banned for?
|
On September 13 2012 01:48 solidbebe wrote:Show nested quote +On September 13 2012 01:46 Iyerbeth wrote:Oh, wow. On September 13 2012 01:45 TL.net Bot wrote:
Belial88 was just banned by semioldguy.
That account was created on 2010-11-07 17:13:15 and had 4302 posts.
Reason: You make a huge post to bash someone and combined with your seemingly endless moderation history, it appears you do not learn from your warnings and bans. Your last chance has been used. Goodbye. Not sure what else to add, didn't see that perm coming. I did, guy was getting banned pretty often. Anyone know the "huge post to bash someone" he was banned for?
This'd be the one:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=368192#8
|
Tears of joy are appropriate.
Shall he make bad posts in tech support?
Quoth the raven, "Nevermore"
No, it doesn't quite rhyme. Oh well.
He would ask mundane google-able questions, give terrifying advice, and had a really strange agenda where he got pissed if people spent more than $500 on a computer.
|
Well, damn. I really like his zerg guides and contributions to the strategy forum in general but I guess his persona just seemed far too antagonistic for the TL moderation team to ignore.
|
On September 13 2012 01:51 Deleuze wrote:Show nested quote +On September 13 2012 01:48 solidbebe wrote:On September 13 2012 01:46 Iyerbeth wrote:Oh, wow. On September 13 2012 01:45 TL.net Bot wrote:
Belial88 was just banned by semioldguy.
That account was created on 2010-11-07 17:13:15 and had 4302 posts.
Reason: You make a huge post to bash someone and combined with your seemingly endless moderation history, it appears you do not learn from your warnings and bans. Your last chance has been used. Goodbye. Not sure what else to add, didn't see that perm coming. I did, guy was getting banned pretty often. Anyone know the "huge post to bash someone" he was banned for? This'd be the one: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=368192#8
I knew the A move Zerg help thread was trouble the second I saw it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
