|  | 
| This thread is for discussing recent bans.  Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue.Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | 
| 
		
				
			
				+ Show Spoiler +[QUOTE]On September 11 2012 09:40 Psychonian wrote:Probably already been posted here but:
 
 [quote]sc4k was just banned by Waxangel.
 
 That account was created on 2010-01-30 13:49:12 and had 3248 posts.
 
 Reason:
 
 [quote]On September 09 2012 13:13 sc4k wrote:
 
 [quote]On September 09 2012 12:06 writer22816 wrote:
 Then why don't you try playing it instead of making comments about a game that you've never played and looking like an ass?[/quote]
 
 I've watched friends play the game for a few hours, couldn't bring myself to play it, after having played Starcraft it's like putting the safety wheels back on my bicycle. I understand that people are going totally crazy about how omg wow you have to use teamwork wow it's so awesome it really tests your understanding and knowledge and timing. Right, but it gets rid of all the mechanical skill that proper RTS requires and is therefore the gaming equivalent of using bumper lanes in bowling.
 
 [quote]On September 09 2012 12:25 Cubu wrote:
 
 [quote]
 On September 09 2012 07:42 sc4k wrote:
 Dota is a glorified UMS designed for people too afraid to play a real RTS. One hero 'micro'. Fuck sake. It's like downgrading chess to have 3 pieces.[/quote]
 
 But that's what makes it so popular.[/quote]
 
 Right, popular amongst casuals, noobs and people who are afraid to play proper RTS...[/quote]
 No more warnings.[/quote]
 
 Anyone know this guy?
 
 EDIT:  Messed up with [quote], fixed it.[/QUOTE]
 From what Ive seen from him he was a pretty good guy, pity he had to ruin it with the dota hate.
psychonian Im never quoting your posts again lol.....
 
	 | 
| 
		
				
			
				On September 11 2012 12:13 turdburgler wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2012 10:09 NrGmonk wrote:On September 11 2012 10:07 Chocolate wrote:On September 11 2012 10:05 Shady Sands wrote:On September 11 2012 09:36 NrGmonk wrote:On September 11 2012 09:30 DODswe4 wrote:what is considered normal amount of open reports at the same time? 1, 2? and what is considered acceptable amount of open reports? I suppose you could have a lot of open reports that not to severe. Curious about it
 You mean per person? No idea. Average overall is 5-25. Most I've ever seen was 58 I think. Who was 58?  Tdot? I think he means for all users, 58 seems astronomical for just one person. Tdot didn't even have too many posts afaik Yes, this. Most per person is probably around 6. challenge accepted This is not going to end well (for turdburgler.)
 
	 | 
| 
		
				
				
						
							  
						ALLEYCAT BLUES50584 Posts
						 sc4k was just temp banned for 90 days by Waxangel. 
 That account was created on 2010-01-30 13:49:12 and had 3248 posts.
 
 Reason: fine fine 90 days
 Reverted to 90days.
 
 :/
 
 well looks like we still have a chance of seeing KwarK end him.
 
	 | 
| 
		
				
			
				Hahahaha "fine fine 90 days". For some reason that reason strikes me as particularly amusing ^^
			
		
		
	 
	 | 
| 
		
				
			
				On September 11 2012 16:52 Aerisky wrote:Hahahaha "fine fine 90 days". For some reason that reason strikes me as particularly amusing ^^
 
  90 day bans are fun (not) 
	 | 
| 
		
				
			
				Definitely still not fun for sc4k, but fun for us elitist, cigar-smoking, objectivist ABL members.
 And come on, I can just imagine Wax sort of shaking his head slightly and rolling his eyes, "fine fine 90 days jeez".
 
 Just some self-deprecatory humor to disarm potential dissidents ;o
 
	 | 
| 
		
				
			
				On September 11 2012 17:01 Aerisky wrote:Definitely still not fun for sc4k, but fun for us elitist, cigar-smoking, objectivist ABL members.
 
 And come on, I can just imagine Wax sort of shaking his head slightly and rolling his eyes, "fine fine 90 days jeez".
 lol i love your stereotype of us.
 
	 | 
| 
		
				
			
				lucysun was just banned by Waxangel.
 
 That account was created on 2012-09-05 17:38:19 and had 5 posts.
 
 Reason: whoops I meant permanent
 All his posts are nuked O_o i'm really curious now....Lucy i really like that name...sigh sad that a lucy would post something horrible (i'm assuming it was horrible)
 
	 | 
| 
		
				
				
						
							  
						ALLEYCAT BLUES50584 Posts
						 On September 11 2012 16:54 Shady Sands wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2012 16:52 Aerisky wrote:Hahahaha "fine fine 90 days". For some reason that reason strikes me as particularly amusing ^^
   90 day bans are fun (not) 
 oh you'd know.
 
	 | 
| 
		
				
			
				On September 11 2012 19:24 BLinD-RawR wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2012 16:54 Shady Sands wrote:On September 11 2012 16:52 Aerisky wrote:Hahahaha "fine fine 90 days". For some reason that reason strikes me as particularly amusing ^^
   90 day bans are fun (not) oh you'd know. I often wonder what goes through a mod's head when they select ban length
 
 a 2-day is clear--it's a "cool down and come back" type of thing
 1-week or 2-week--serious infraction, don't do that again
 perm--like a gtfo
 
 but 30 and 90 day bans?  what niche do they fill?
 
 + Show Spoiler +
 I missed Bisu's  OSL ODT run because of my 90 day   
	 | 
| 
		
				
			
				On September 11 2012 19:22 Shock710 wrote:Show nested quote +lucysun was just banned by Waxangel.
 
 That account was created on 2012-09-05 17:38:19 and had 5 posts.
 
 Reason: whoops I meant permanent
 All his posts are nuked O_o i'm really curious now....Lucy i really like that name...sigh sad that a lucy would post something horrible (i'm assuming it was horrible) 
 Just advertising I think.
 
 
 lucysun was just temp banned for 2 days  by Waxangel. That account was created on 2012-09-05 17:38:19  and had 5  posts.Reason:  nice advertising   
	 | 
| 
		
				
				
						
							  
						United States43189 Posts
						 On September 11 2012 19:33 Shady Sands wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2012 19:24 BLinD-RawR wrote:On September 11 2012 16:54 Shady Sands wrote:On September 11 2012 16:52 Aerisky wrote:Hahahaha "fine fine 90 days". For some reason that reason strikes me as particularly amusing ^^
   90 day bans are fun (not) oh you'd know. I often wonder what goes through a mod's head when they select ban length a 2-day is clear--it's a "cool down and come back" type of thing 1-week or 2-week--serious infraction, don't do that again perm--like a gtfo but 30 and 90 day bans?  what niche do they fill?+ Show Spoiler + I missed Bisu's  OSL ODT run because of my 90 day   Permanently banned users are generally allowed back after 90 days or so anyway with mod permission. Banned users making new accounts to dodge bans get rebanned but a PBU who mails a mod and asks to come back generally can. A 90 day allows a user with a lot of posts and history who you would otherwise perm to come back on the same name.
 
	 | 
| 
		
				
				
						
							  
						ALLEYCAT BLUES50584 Posts
						 Elios was just banned by Waxangel.  That account was created on 2011-11-15 10:39:20 and had 203 posts. Reason: thanks ^_^
 this is lacking context....to me it looks like the guy has been on the run from wax forever and then he got cocky and decided to PM him.
 
	 | 
| 
		
				
			
				On September 12 2012 00:43 BLinD-RawR wrote:Show nested quote +Elios was just banned by Waxangel.  That account was created on 2011-11-15 10:39:20 and had 203 posts. Reason: Original Message From Elios:Sup
 thanks ^_^ this is lacking context....to me it looks like the guy has been on the run from wax forever and then he got cocky and decided to PM him. I dunno, but when looking at his history I found this rather funny.
 
 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=328958¤tpage=12#222
 
 
 It doesn't even seem like ETT realized at the time that he was quoting HIS OWN warned post.Elios was just temp banned for 1 week by EvilTeletubby.  That account was created on 2011-11-15 10:39:20 and had 40 posts. Reason: Show nested quote +On April 16 2012 10:08 Elios wrote: Hide nested quote - On April 16 2012 07:28 Elios wrote:Retarded obs... must be JP.
 
 User was warned for this post
 
 JP is retarded /o/ Why........ would you think it's a good idea to quote something someone was already warned for, THEN say the same thing? 
	 | 
| 
		
				
			
				On September 12 2012 02:47 sylverfyre wrote:Show nested quote +On September 12 2012 00:43 BLinD-RawR wrote:Elios was just banned by Waxangel.  That account was created on 2011-11-15 10:39:20 and had 203 posts. Reason: Original Message From Elios:Sup
 thanks ^_^this is lacking context....to me it looks like the guy has been on the run from wax forever and then he got cocky and decided to PM him. I dunno, but when looking at his history I found this rather funny.http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=328958¤tpage=12#222 Show nested quote +Elios was just temp banned for 1 week by EvilTeletubby.  That account was created on 2011-11-15 10:39:20 and had 40 posts. Reason: On April 16 2012 10:08 Elios wrote: Hide nested quote - On April 16 2012 07:28 Elios wrote:Retarded obs... must be JP.
 
 User was warned for this post
 
 JP is retarded /o/Why........ would you think it's a good idea to quote something someone was already warned for, THEN say the same thing? It doesn't even seem like ETT realized at the time that he was quoting HIS OWN warned post. Hehe, drunk guy ett. Or maybe good guy ett for that matter.
 Edit: wait what, noncorpreal is posting agian?
 
	 | 
| 
		
				
			
				On September 11 2012 20:30 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2012 19:33 Shady Sands wrote:On September 11 2012 19:24 BLinD-RawR wrote:On September 11 2012 16:54 Shady Sands wrote:On September 11 2012 16:52 Aerisky wrote:Hahahaha "fine fine 90 days". For some reason that reason strikes me as particularly amusing ^^
   90 day bans are fun (not) oh you'd know. I often wonder what goes through a mod's head when they select ban length a 2-day is clear--it's a "cool down and come back" type of thing 1-week or 2-week--serious infraction, don't do that again perm--like a gtfo but 30 and 90 day bans?  what niche do they fill?+ Show Spoiler + I missed Bisu's  OSL ODT run because of my 90 day   Permanently banned users are generally allowed back after 90 days or so anyway with mod permission. Banned users making new accounts to dodge bans get rebanned but a PBU who mails a mod and asks to come back generally can. A 90 day allows a user with a lot of posts and history who you would otherwise perm to come back on the same name. is this common knowledge? as in, do the people on TL realize that a "perma ban" isn't permanent?
 
	 | 
| 
		
				
			
				On September 12 2012 05:34 xmungam wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2012 20:30 KwarK wrote:On September 11 2012 19:33 Shady Sands wrote:On September 11 2012 19:24 BLinD-RawR wrote:On September 11 2012 16:54 Shady Sands wrote:On September 11 2012 16:52 Aerisky wrote:Hahahaha "fine fine 90 days". For some reason that reason strikes me as particularly amusing ^^
   90 day bans are fun (not) oh you'd know. I often wonder what goes through a mod's head when they select ban length a 2-day is clear--it's a "cool down and come back" type of thing 1-week or 2-week--serious infraction, don't do that again perm--like a gtfo but 30 and 90 day bans?  what niche do they fill?+ Show Spoiler + I missed Bisu's  OSL ODT run because of my 90 day   Permanently banned users are generally allowed back after 90 days or so anyway with mod permission. Banned users making new accounts to dodge bans get rebanned but a PBU who mails a mod and asks to come back generally can. A 90 day allows a user with a lot of posts and history who you would otherwise perm to come back on the same name. is this common knowledge? as in, do the people on TL realize that a "perma ban" isn't permanent?  I think most people know, at least the ABL regulars do, some of us like Shady Sands and Blind Rawr are PBU's
 
	 | 
| 
		
				
				
						Perm ban is a permanent ban on that account.
							  
						Zurich15355 Posts
						 
 Sometime people are let in again on a new account. But the perm banned account is permanently banned.
 
	 | 
| 
		
				
			
				the 9/11 thread should have some promising temp bans if you guys are interested in following it.
			
		
		
	 
	 | 
| 
		
				
			
				On September 11 2012 20:30 KwarK wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2012 19:33 Shady Sands wrote:On September 11 2012 19:24 BLinD-RawR wrote:On September 11 2012 16:54 Shady Sands wrote:On September 11 2012 16:52 Aerisky wrote:Hahahaha "fine fine 90 days". For some reason that reason strikes me as particularly amusing ^^
   90 day bans are fun (not) oh you'd know. I often wonder what goes through a mod's head when they select ban length a 2-day is clear--it's a "cool down and come back" type of thing 1-week or 2-week--serious infraction, don't do that again perm--like a gtfo but 30 and 90 day bans?  what niche do they fill?+ Show Spoiler + I missed Bisu's  OSL ODT run because of my 90 day   Permanently banned users are generally allowed back after 90 days or so anyway with mod permission. Banned users making new accounts to dodge bans get rebanned but a PBU who mails a mod and asks to come back generally can. A 90 day allows a user with a lot of posts and history who you would otherwise perm to come back on the same name. 
 Ah, okay.
 
 Sigh... now this makes me a little sad that I threw away what reputation I had on TL arguing with Lightwip.  A valuable lesson, I guess
 
	 | 
|  | 
|  | 
|  |