The Automated Ban List - Page 1387

NEEDZMOAR was just temp banned for 30 days by GMarshal.

That account was created on 2011-12-14 01:16:12 and had 185 posts.

Reason: You know what's great? Celebrating events where hundreds died tragically. Do you also celebrate the holocaust with cake, or is it reserved only for some massacres where hundreds of civilians are brutally murdered?

On September 12 2012 08:04 Myles wrote:

When xDaunt is going 'wtf' towards another conservative you know that poster is really off their rocker. I was left dumbfounded by almost every post NonCorporeal wrote last night. That being said, the post GMarshal banned him for was probably one of his better ones in that it actually linked to a relevant article that sourced Gallup.

On September 12 2012 08:32 farvacola wrote:

He linked to an article from a no-name site that improperly and incompletely cited Gallup, a tailor-made piece for poor discussion.

feNzR was just banned by GMarshal.

That account was created on 2012-09-12 05:10:39 and had 1 posts.

Reason: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWsJcg-g1pg

On September 12 2012 08:06 Cornstyle wrote:


Woohoo, first report leading to a ban! Granted it was an easy one cause the guy is a dick but still...

On July 06 2012 22:54 Yonnua wrote:


I'm talking about a couple minute long spike late game where he was multitasking and microing a few battles at once.

On August 28 2012 21:42 FataLe wrote:

This was fustrating to watch as a Protoss player. I was constantly agitated at San's 1 aness.

grrr. could have saved so manymore collossus.

On September 10 2012 21:14 Evangelist wrote:
The only condition that a unit requires for inclusion in a game is that it has substantive differences than another unit. That is why a battlecruiser and a marine are able to co-exist despite arguably being comparable to each other (terrans only have two low damage rapid fire units). The only problem with the warhound is that it overlaps far too much with the marauder and at the same time is also better than the marauder. This is due to the following reasons:

- it costs the same supply and only slightly higher amounts of resources
- it is more mobile
- it carries improved damage against nearly all of the opponents a marauder is expected to face
- it has a longer range
- it has higher HP
- it can be mass repaired

So for the same supply you get improved damage, longer range, more mobility, high survivability and the ability to be repaired. It is even larger, so it suffers less from siege tank fire.

There were plenty of overlapping units in BW. This constant harping on about the reaver and the dragoon and so on - there was nothing particularly special about the dragoon or the vulture or lurkers. Lurkers were just immobile hellions. Dragoons were just stalkers with a bit more damage. The vulture doesn't even have the micro of the hellion for gods sake.

The only unit people keep going on about is the reaver. Well you know what? I've had it with the reaver. I'm going to call it what it was. It was a complete design failure. It was a stupid unit that couldn't survive without entire tactics being based around its use. It was slow, buggy and looked ridiculous. There was no micro involved in the reaver without the use of shuttles. It lagged a mile behind every other unit, it required extra building micro in a game already overloaded with it. What's more, it was a dumb fire unit - it just did splash damage in a game completely overloaded with splash damage

The reaver epitomised everything that was wrong with BW design. It epitomised everything people misunderstand about system design. The colossus is a far better unit.