|
My thoughts on map pool:
All ladder maps EXCEPT Blistering Sands, Steppes of War, and Kulas.
Include the blizzard map Crossfire, and a couple Iccup maps. Devotion seems good and Fighting Spirit is always a winner in my opinion.
EDIT: If anybody from the University of Colorado wants to form a CSL team, PM me! I know there are a couple of players here. I think Jonoman92 goes to CU Denver (might be wrong... maybe he'd be willing to play for us anyway because he's super dank).
|
On August 26 2010 15:31 Meta wrote: My thoughts on map pool:
All ladder maps EXCEPT Blistering Sands, Steppes of War, and Kulas.
Include the blizzard map Crossfire, and a couple Iccup maps. Devotion seems good and Fighting Spirit is always a winner in my opinion.
EDIT: If anybody from the University of Colorado wants to form a CSL team, PM me! I know there are a couple of players here. I think Jonoman92 goes to CU Denver (might be wrong... maybe he'd be willing to play for us anyway because he's super dank).
Nah man. Metalopolis 5 games in a row. That way, no one can blame their losses on the map and less practice time, since everyone just needs to train one map!
|
On August 26 2010 15:31 Meta wrote: My thoughts on map pool:
All ladder maps EXCEPT Blistering Sands, Steppes of War, and Kulas.
Include the blizzard map Crossfire, and a couple Iccup maps. Devotion seems good and Fighting Spirit is always a winner in my opinion.
EDIT: If anybody from the University of Colorado wants to form a CSL team, PM me! I know there are a couple of players here. I think Jonoman92 goes to CU Denver (might be wrong... maybe he'd be willing to play for us anyway because he's super dank). are you serious???? those 3 are so good though!
i would remove Desert oasis FIRST, as well as most players on the ladder. 2nd and 3rd would be the 2 new maps, they have stupid open nature which discourage macro games :>
|
On August 26 2010 16:14 NB wrote:Show nested quote +On August 26 2010 15:31 Meta wrote: My thoughts on map pool:
All ladder maps EXCEPT Blistering Sands, Steppes of War, and Kulas.
Include the blizzard map Crossfire, and a couple Iccup maps. Devotion seems good and Fighting Spirit is always a winner in my opinion.
EDIT: If anybody from the University of Colorado wants to form a CSL team, PM me! I know there are a couple of players here. I think Jonoman92 goes to CU Denver (might be wrong... maybe he'd be willing to play for us anyway because he's super dank). are you serious???? those 3 are so good though! i would remove Desert oasis FIRST, as well as most players on the ladder. 2nd and 3rd would be the 2 new maps, they have stupid open nature which discourage macro games :> you obviously have low standards for maps.
|
Desert oasis is played so little anyways, having it in the map rotation would make for, at the very least, an interesting set each match. Widen our horizons, or something like that...
|
Am I the only one who appreciates a little desert oasis once in a while?
|
I hate desert oasis. I usually just cheese it so I can move on with my life. Some of the ICCup maps would be nice for sure. Kulas is a possible ban imo, but Steppes of War and Blistering Sands are great maps imo.
|
Why not let all ladder 1v1 maps in. Metalopolis game 1, losing team picks next map for the remaining 4.
|
ok I got the email. For 2v2, when it says anyone can play in it, does that include players who are already playing in a 1v1?
|
correct. two people can double up - total of 4 unique players required.
edit: IM DUMB ITS TWO PEOPLE T_T
|
To clarify: we're not having an "Ace" match anymore. Instead, it's four 1v1s (four different people for each) and one 2v2 (both can be repeats, optional of course).
|
On August 27 2010 11:32 DarthThienAn wrote: To clarify: we're not having an "Ace" match anymore. Instead, it's four 1v1s (four different people for each) and one 2v2 (both can be repeats, optional of course). oh what?????????? so we have to train 2v2 as well? T__T bring ace back pleaseeeeeeeeeeee... 2v2 is so weird though
|
Ah, classic proleague format. I like!
|
Schoolcraft Community College in Livonia, Michigan |8]
|
Roffles
Pitcairn19291 Posts
Wtf? Even classic PL format had Ace matches.
|
Well, I think this change is to allow other schools who don't have big name players to have a chance to get to the Playoffs, and not just rely on a superstar player who just happens to be in the school to get 2 out of the 3 wins in a match.
2v2s are going to be interesting this year. Will 2 of the same race be allowed?
|
It also allows for more teams to be signed up who only have 4 man lineups instead of needing 5. It can make a difference for small schools.
|
On August 16 2010 17:05 DarthThienAn wrote:Show nested quote +On August 16 2010 17:02 blabber wrote: where's Berkeley? I'm getting kinda worried, lol Haven't heard from phase/Anthony. He should be graduated now I guess though, huh? Anthony graduated but his brother Robert is a sophomore here now I think
edit: oops nvm looks like you found some new guy
|
If anyone is from the University of Utah please pm me!
|
On August 27 2010 14:01 Phelix wrote: Well, I think this change is to allow other schools who don't have big name players to have a chance to get to the Playoffs, and not just rely on a superstar player who just happens to be in the school to get 2 out of the 3 wins in a match.
2v2s are going to be interesting this year. Will 2 of the same race be allowed? Nope.
On August 27 2010 14:28 ZlaSHeR wrote: It also allows for more teams to be signed up who only have 4 man lineups instead of needing 5. It can make a difference for small schools. This is true.
On August 27 2010 14:40 Superiorwolf wrote:Show nested quote +On August 16 2010 17:05 DarthThienAn wrote:On August 16 2010 17:02 blabber wrote: where's Berkeley? I'm getting kinda worried, lol Haven't heard from phase/Anthony. He should be graduated now I guess though, huh? Anthony graduated but his brother Robert is a sophomore here now I think phase recommended someone to me, but he hasn't replied, so Berkeley currently does not have a representative ^^.
|
|
|
|