|
On January 09 2011 09:53 Kang19 wrote:
LMFAO @ telfire. "HERP DERP YOU GUYS ARE ALL WRONG AND I HAVE HAD PLENTY OF 2560x1600 MONITORS BUT I WONT SHARE ANY MODEL NUMBERS WITH YOU BECAUSE YOURE ALL DOUCHEBAGS!!"
I'm running a BenQ E2420HD, 24" 1920x1080 with 2ms response time. Perfect monitor for the average consumer who will only really use it to watch movies and play games on. I use the same monitor as my main, it's the real deal! 
|
benq 24'' 1080p is what im using right now. I like that it has 2 inputs so i have my pc and my ps3 hooked up to it.
Perfect for me. I use it for gaming, blu ray movies, tv and every other everyday use.
And for its quality much cheaper than anything else ive seen
|
On January 09 2011 08:03 TheAngelofDeath wrote:
24" of 1080p beauty. :D
This. I'll probably get a second monitor soon though.
|
On January 09 2011 17:56 eu.exodus wrote:
benq 24'' 1080p is what im using right now. I like that it has 2 inputs so i have my pc and my ps3 hooked up to it.
24'' IIYAMA 1920x1080
I also hooked up PC and PS3.
|
have the Dell U2311H.. Very happy with it, good and cheap IPS monitor. Paid around US$200 for it
|
i use a 24" samsung 245bw, had it for a couple years, i love it. i use 1920x1200 for all my games, and when i crank up the graphics games look phenomenal.
i google shopped it, and for some reason they say it's like $700+. i did not pay that when it first came out, i have the receipt right here from 2007 and i paid $350.
you know what, on the receipt it said i got the 22" 226bw. but i have the box, and on my monitor itself it says 245bw.
so i think they messed up lol.
|
24" Dell widescreen lcd... still getting used to it considering I played sc2 on a crappy laptop until 2 weeks ago
|
2 x 24" 1920x1080
But I play on 1280x800
|
![[image loading]](http://www.pccasegear.com/images/p2770hdss.jpg)
I use a 27" Samsung P2770HD. While technically a TV the reason I got it is because it has all the inputs of a TV meaning:
- DVI
- HDMI
- RCA
- YPbPr
- Optical out
- Headphone out
I have my computer, Xbox 360 and Gamecube all connected with the monitor handling video and audio with the monitor set to use external audio. This way all I have to do is flip "channels" on my monitor (remote <3) and I can be playing my Xbox or Gamecube with audio coming out of my good speakers.
It also has a HDTV tuner built in but I don't have much interest in watching TV.
So much better than my old setup where I had a extra sound card and an annoying switchbox to achieve the same thing.
1920x1080 resolution so it's great for gaming and watching movies as well as general PC use and work. I'm not sure what type of panel it uses but it has miles better contrast than my old 24 inch TN Asus.
On top of all that it was less than $500 AUD... the convenience and quality has made it a worthwhile purchase for me.
http://www.pccasegear.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=558_1092&products_id=14759
|
22" 1920 X 1080p
love it.
also, there seems to be a lot of idiots not knowing what HD and higher resolution is.
"HD" is just a term for a resolution higher than 1280x1024
TVS used to have a 1024x768 resolution, thats why theres 768p and 1080p.
my 22" is the same resolution than alot of people's 24". it just means that i have a higher dpi than them. which i love, cause everything looks super cripsy.
also, this monitor only costed like $220AUD
|
![[image loading]](http://i432.photobucket.com/albums/qq44/mpam888/myscreen.jpg)
24"x3, 3240x1980 and really love it
|
23'' Samsung SyncMaster 2343BWX. 2048 x 1152 is recommended, but I'm not used to a wide screen, so I use 1280 x 960 as it looks normal and not wide or anything to me.
|
On January 09 2011 19:30 pirouni wrote:24"x3, 3240x1980 and really love it
I'm jealous lol.
|
lol 19" sqaure one xD 
|
39.624 cm.
..
or 15.6". 1080p all the way
|
I am using a 21.5" monitor with 1920*1080 and a 19" with 1440*900
|
22,5" LG W2261VP 1920x1080
|
ASUS 27" wide LCD with 1920x1080 res (native 1080p HD). And I didn't break the bank, was only $300.
|
samsung 19" wide 1440*900 , i miss my 15" trinitron :'(
|
On January 09 2011 08:56 Element)LoGiC wrote:
telfire, maybe you should tell them the better resolutions that are available at 23+ inches for monitors instead of just saying it's extremely low, which is an exaggeration. I believe the better resolution is 1920x1200, which is actually significantly larger than "HD", almost 12% larger. But most monitors are actually "HD" now, even at 24 - 27 inches. I was even having a hard time finding a 26 inch with a larger resolution than the relatively low "HD" resolution.
This
I mean, I bought my monitor 2-3 years ago now? Paid £260ish, 1920x1200 resolution. The monitor costs about £150 now. £150 doesn't seem expensive for a 24" monitor to me?
@OP just make sure you shop around and get the highest resolution, lowest response time in your budget etc etc
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
