|
When using this resource, please read FragKrag's opening post. The Tech Support forum regulars have helped create countless of desktop systems without any compensation. The least you can do is provide all of the information required for them to help you properly. |
United States8476 Posts
|
On August 28 2010 17:15 [Fin]Vittu wrote: btw, this maybe be a relaly dumb question, but does that build come with a cooling fan, R04R?
For the processor? Yes it should.
|
If I have really little money and have to choose to upgrade EITHER GPU or CPU, which should I upgrade?
I have:
Athlon 64 3500+ 7600GS 512mb 3gb ram
I can get 9800GT/HD4850 for $60 OR I can get a Athlon II X2 240 + mobo + 2gb ram for $110 (or perhaps a C2D)
I don't have money for both. Which would give me more improvement? Please don't answer both, even though that is the best answer. Also, are nvidia cards better than ati specifically for SC2?
|
Neither seem like justifiable upgrades. It might push it past minimum requirements, but the other component that wasn't upgraded will still be bottlenecking the system by a lot.
|
On August 28 2010 08:57 Myrmidon wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2010 08:02 zekie wrote:On August 28 2010 03:10 a176 wrote:On August 27 2010 03:20 zekie wrote: was wondering how this computer looks for running SC2?
CPU - AMD Athlon 64x2 Dual-Core 3800+ MOBO - A8N-SLI Premium UAYZ GPU - BFG GeForce 8600 GTS - GeForce 7950 GX2 PSU - OCZ GXS700 700W SLI Power Supply MEMORY - 2 x 1GB Kingston HyperX PC3200 KHX3200K2/2G - 2 x 512MB Generic PC3200 HDD - 120GB IDE WD1200JB-00G - 80GB IDE ST380011A OS - Windows XP or Windows 7 CASE - A-Top XBlade Gaming Mid-Tower ATX Case Are you posting what you have or what you're going to buy? thinking about buying ^^ how well do you guys think this wouldrun Sc2? Those are some fairly ancient parts. The processor is a few generations old (a little over 5 years), and it's only 2.0 GHz. It's probably the weakest link. The 7950 is almost as old, but it was a top-of-the-line card back in the day. It should be around as good as a card you can pick up for $60 today. The 8600 GTS is a little newer, but it's not a high-end card in its generation so it won't be nearly as good. The memory is DDR1, where most people upgrading their computers today are using DDR2. Modern computers can only use DDR3. i.e. the memory, like the mobo/CPU, is correspondingly old and slow. At least the case looks okay, and the PSU is mostly okay too (only out of spec when delivering more power than those parts would use). I would think the GPU can handle medium graphics and shaders just fine, but the CPU might struggle keeping up with any large number of units in the game. Also, the CPU isn't much upgradeable without changing the motherboard and RAM. All in all, it looks like a high-end gaming machine from four years ago, probably not worth buying these days. What's the asking price?
$600
|
What is your budget?
prefer around $400 but up to $600 is acceptable if the extra $200 makes a big difference (I live in Canada)
What is your resolution?
1280x1024 is what my resolution is set at now (also not 100% sure if the resolution in the display properties is what you guys are looking for)
What are you using it for?
Mostly gaming, surfing, movies and a little bit of school
What is your upgrade cycle?
usually around 4 years.
When do you plan on building it?
ASAP
Do you plan on overclocking?
I don't know anything about overclocking. is it safe to do this if you dont' know exactly what you're doing?
if I dont need to i doubt i will
Do you need an Operating System?
yes but my wife is a student so I think i can get it for $30 correct?
Do you plan to add a second GPU for SLI or Crossfire?
I really dont think it will be necessary because I dont plan on playing on really high graphics.
Where are you buying your parts from?
ncix.com or newegg.ca. I'm not sure where newegg ships from but i'm pretty close to the ncix store in Vancouver so hopefully shipping will be less. But honestly whatever can get me the best computer for the cheapest price.
Also my monitor is ancient, its a MultiSync 1740CX so I might want to get a new monitor but not sure if that can fit in the budget very well. I can play on this junker if its not too big of a deal for performance or anything (will it effect the resolution or anything?).
EDIT
are there any decent laptops that could play SC2 for $600?
http://kamloops.en.craigslist.ca/sys/1923352197.html good deal?
|
zekie, definitely 600 CAD is too much. Laptops around the 600 CAD range usually can't play SC2 on lowest settings satisfactorily because they have integrated graphics. The ones that do have discrete graphics at that range should be able to play on lowest settings fine; however, I wouldn't bother unless the mobility is important to you.
+ Show Spoiler [cheap newegg.ca build] + I tried to keep the total low under 500 CAD while being more powerful than the old 600 CAD computer offer and keeping questionable components to a minimum. Most of the skimping came on the AM2/AM2+/AM3 mobo and just 2 GB DDR2 RAM. It's enough RAM for your purposes and the RAM has a good reputation, but the mobo manufacturer does not.
|
On August 29 2010 02:06 Myrmidon wrote:zekie, definitely 600 CAD is too much. Laptops around the 600 CAD range usually can't play SC2 on lowest settings satisfactorily because they have integrated graphics. The ones that do have discrete graphics at that range should be able to play on lowest settings fine; however, I wouldn't bother unless the mobility is important to you. + Show Spoiler [cheap newegg.ca build] +I tried to keep the total low under 500 CAD while being more powerful than the old 600 CAD computer offer and keeping questionable components to a minimum. Most of the skimping came on the AM2/AM2+/AM3 mobo and just 2 GB DDR2 RAM. It's enough RAM for your purposes and the RAM has a good reputation, but the mobo manufacturer does not.
thanks for the build, which components are questionable and would be better to upgrade? maybe I should spend a bit more on the mobo? if there are questionable components in there i wouldn't mind getting closer to the $550 or $600 range to get more reliable pieces (if thats possible)
Also how much would it be for 2-2GB sticks of ram? and is everything compatible? I've heard that I should really research that but TBH i'm not really sure how 
EDIT - this computer is actually les than $400 ($398 =])
also are the prices on the newegg.ca site in american? nevermind, why did you put the +10 in brackets beside the price on the items?
|
[QUOTE]On August 29 2010 02:06 Myrmidon wrote: zekie, definitely 600 CAD is too much. Laptops around the 600 CAD range usually can't play SC2 on lowest settings satisfactorily because they have integrated graphics. The ones that do have discrete graphics at that range should be able to play on lowest settings fine; however, I wouldn't bother unless the mobility is important to you.
+ Show Spoiler [cheap newegg.ca build] + I tried to keep the total low under 500 CAD while being more powerful than the old 600 CAD computer offer and keeping questionable components to a minimum. Most of the skimping came on the AM2/AM2+/AM3 mobo and just 2 GB DDR2 RAM. It's enough RAM for your purposes and the RAM has a good reputation, but the mobo manufacturer does not. [/QUOTE
My new build is the same core as this (Athlon II X3 and GT240), and it's a nice rig. Runs SCII Ultra with no hiccups at 1600X900
|
I wouldn't go for that mobo/cpu combo personally, I've not heard good things about Biostar. Alternatively, you could get this combo, which has an Asus mobo. The overall price is about 3 dollars more after shipping. Not really sure if Asus is that much better though, the board had some pretty shoddy reviews too.
|
Price in parenthesis were shipping costs on a per-item basis.
Definitely go with that ASUS mobo instead, even though it's microATX and a relatively low-end ASUS part. If you want to get with the times, you could try a AM3 motherboard and DDR3 RAM, but it's probably not worth the extra cost. The Biostar probably shouldn't be an issue, but it's not worth trying out Biostar IMO.
Other possible upgrades would be getting 4 GB RAM, this case with the same PSU as before, and this GPU. Generally with budget builds, the biggest concern may be explode-in-your-face (well, explode-in-your-case) PSUs, but that's not an issue here.
|
On August 29 2010 03:54 Myrmidon wrote:Price in parenthesis were shipping costs on a per-item basis. Definitely go with that ASUS mobo instead, even though it's microATX and a relatively low-end ASUS part. If you want to get with the times, you could try a AM3 motherboard and DDR3 RAM, but it's probably not worth the extra cost. The Biostar probably shouldn't be an issue, but it's not worth trying out Biostar IMO. Other possible upgrades would be getting 4 GB RAM, this case with the same PSU as before, and this GPU. Generally with budget builds, the biggest concern may be explode-in-your-face (well, explode-in-your-case) PSUs, but that's not an issue here. that recent mobo u mentioned, I did buy it and its pretty good, no problems so fair, so that mobo is pretty good if your looking for a low budget gaming build.
|
On August 28 2010 10:10 a176 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2010 09:17 deconduo wrote:On August 28 2010 08:07 a176 wrote:On August 28 2010 05:19 deconduo wrote:On August 28 2010 04:05 a176 wrote:On August 27 2010 09:22 exarchrum wrote:Awesome thread ! Anyways I think I'm in the market to build myself a computer. I did some research and got a basic list so far. CPU: AMD Athlon II X3 445 $80 GPU: SAPPHIRE 100283L Radeon HD 5770$135 Motherboard: Foxcon Motherboard$45 RAM: G.Skill 4GB DDR3 1333 $81 I already have optical drives, a HD, and case. My HD is a Western Digital Cavier IDE 160gb drive from 2004, so its quite old but it has enough space for my needs. Would I be hurting myself by not upgrading to a new hard drive? My case is an ANTEC, i'm not really sure of the model. But the dimensions are roughly 15.5 in x 7.5 in x 16in. I'm guessing I'll need a new power supply as my old one is only 350W. Some suggestions here based on my other parts needs would be awesome. On Newegg my total for CPU, GPU, mobo, & RAM is $395 right. I'm trying to keep this under $500. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Edit: Another question: When would be a good time to buy? I can wait a few months. I noticed a lot of graphic card reviews dated around late september, early october of 2009 so is that a time when new lines come out? Thanks! Hi, http://www.newegg.com/Product/ComboDealDetails.aspx?ItemList=Combo.470418http://www.newegg.com/Product/ComboDealDetails.aspx?ItemList=Combo.457048http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128431$450, what do you think? See CPU review here: http://www.anandtech.com/show/2923/6Also, I would definitely recommend upgrading to a more modern drive. Not only is the SATA interface much faster than IDE, the drives themselves are much faster as well. Think about picking up a Western Digital Caviar Black if you can. I don't know why you recommended that CPU and RAM, both are terrible choices. The Athlon II X3 and G-Skill that he picked out are much much better. I would go with the Gigabyte motherboard. That foxcon one looks pretty bad. While the GTS 460 is awesome, the 5770 is just as good value for money, especially for a budget build. I would bump up to a 460 if you can afford it though. You should pick up a Spinpoint F3 rather than a caviar black, same performance and the spinpoint is cheaper. For a power supply, the OCZ Fatal1ty should be just fine. The Athlon X2 and X3 perform about at the same level. The X2 will edge out the X3 because you get a faster core speed for cheaper, vs an extra core that some apps may not use. So with my build, you get a comparably fast cpu and a stellar gpu. Lastly, the OCZ stick offers far better timings and a heatspreader over the gskill? Myrmidon's build offers the best cpu selection. No, the Athlon II X3 is still a better choice than either the phenom x2 or the athlon x2 for gaming. The extra core has been shown time and time again to be much better than a small increase in clock speed, even in games that aren't properly threaded yet like starcraft 2. The only reason you would get the Phenom X2 over the athlon X3 is because of the unlocked multiplier which makes it much easier to overclock. Recently OCZ ram is notoriously bad. You have to be very luck to find a pair with both sticks working perfectly. After paying shipping for RMAing a few times, the low price won't seem quite as nice anymore. do you want to show me where the X3 is so amazingly better than the X2? As I've provided one link. Here's another: http://techreport.com/articles.x/18448/6Dirt 2 and MW2 make use of extra cores. SC2 doesn't: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/blizzard-entertainment-starcraft-ii-benchmark,2611-9.html
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-gaming-cpu-core-i5-760-core-i7-970,2698-2.html
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/multi-core-cpu,2280-11.html
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-cores-performance,2373-12.html
Even the link you posted on SC2 says:
'A triple-core CPU at 2.8 GHz or more should be able to provide all the performance you'd want for StarCraft II.'
I'm done for now, if you want to argue more take it to PM.
|
On August 29 2010 06:10 deconduo wrote:Show nested quote +On August 28 2010 10:10 a176 wrote:On August 28 2010 09:17 deconduo wrote:On August 28 2010 08:07 a176 wrote:On August 28 2010 05:19 deconduo wrote:On August 28 2010 04:05 a176 wrote:On August 27 2010 09:22 exarchrum wrote:Awesome thread ! Anyways I think I'm in the market to build myself a computer. I did some research and got a basic list so far. CPU: AMD Athlon II X3 445 $80 GPU: SAPPHIRE 100283L Radeon HD 5770$135 Motherboard: Foxcon Motherboard$45 RAM: G.Skill 4GB DDR3 1333 $81 I already have optical drives, a HD, and case. My HD is a Western Digital Cavier IDE 160gb drive from 2004, so its quite old but it has enough space for my needs. Would I be hurting myself by not upgrading to a new hard drive? My case is an ANTEC, i'm not really sure of the model. But the dimensions are roughly 15.5 in x 7.5 in x 16in. I'm guessing I'll need a new power supply as my old one is only 350W. Some suggestions here based on my other parts needs would be awesome. On Newegg my total for CPU, GPU, mobo, & RAM is $395 right. I'm trying to keep this under $500. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Edit: Another question: When would be a good time to buy? I can wait a few months. I noticed a lot of graphic card reviews dated around late september, early october of 2009 so is that a time when new lines come out? Thanks! Hi, http://www.newegg.com/Product/ComboDealDetails.aspx?ItemList=Combo.470418http://www.newegg.com/Product/ComboDealDetails.aspx?ItemList=Combo.457048http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128431$450, what do you think? See CPU review here: http://www.anandtech.com/show/2923/6Also, I would definitely recommend upgrading to a more modern drive. Not only is the SATA interface much faster than IDE, the drives themselves are much faster as well. Think about picking up a Western Digital Caviar Black if you can. I don't know why you recommended that CPU and RAM, both are terrible choices. The Athlon II X3 and G-Skill that he picked out are much much better. I would go with the Gigabyte motherboard. That foxcon one looks pretty bad. While the GTS 460 is awesome, the 5770 is just as good value for money, especially for a budget build. I would bump up to a 460 if you can afford it though. You should pick up a Spinpoint F3 rather than a caviar black, same performance and the spinpoint is cheaper. For a power supply, the OCZ Fatal1ty should be just fine. The Athlon X2 and X3 perform about at the same level. The X2 will edge out the X3 because you get a faster core speed for cheaper, vs an extra core that some apps may not use. So with my build, you get a comparably fast cpu and a stellar gpu. Lastly, the OCZ stick offers far better timings and a heatspreader over the gskill? Myrmidon's build offers the best cpu selection. No, the Athlon II X3 is still a better choice than either the phenom x2 or the athlon x2 for gaming. The extra core has been shown time and time again to be much better than a small increase in clock speed, even in games that aren't properly threaded yet like starcraft 2. The only reason you would get the Phenom X2 over the athlon X3 is because of the unlocked multiplier which makes it much easier to overclock. Recently OCZ ram is notoriously bad. You have to be very luck to find a pair with both sticks working perfectly. After paying shipping for RMAing a few times, the low price won't seem quite as nice anymore. do you want to show me where the X3 is so amazingly better than the X2? As I've provided one link. Here's another: http://techreport.com/articles.x/18448/6Dirt 2 and MW2 make use of extra cores. SC2 doesn't: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/blizzard-entertainment-starcraft-ii-benchmark,2611-9.html http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-gaming-cpu-core-i5-760-core-i7-970,2698-2.htmlhttp://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/multi-core-cpu,2280-11.htmlhttp://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-cores-performance,2373-12.htmlEven the link you posted on SC2 says: 'A triple-core CPU at 2.8 GHz or more should be able to provide all the performance you'd want for StarCraft II.' I'm done for now, if you want to argue more take it to PM. dude what. just look at the bench, two -> three cores nets you like 1 fps.
i mean i agree the x3 is an overall better buy but it doesn't really matter if we're just talking about sc2.
|
On August 29 2010 07:32 mahnini wrote:Show nested quote +On August 29 2010 06:10 deconduo wrote:On August 28 2010 10:10 a176 wrote:On August 28 2010 09:17 deconduo wrote:On August 28 2010 08:07 a176 wrote:On August 28 2010 05:19 deconduo wrote:On August 28 2010 04:05 a176 wrote:On August 27 2010 09:22 exarchrum wrote:Awesome thread ! Anyways I think I'm in the market to build myself a computer. I did some research and got a basic list so far. CPU: AMD Athlon II X3 445 $80 GPU: SAPPHIRE 100283L Radeon HD 5770$135 Motherboard: Foxcon Motherboard$45 RAM: G.Skill 4GB DDR3 1333 $81 I already have optical drives, a HD, and case. My HD is a Western Digital Cavier IDE 160gb drive from 2004, so its quite old but it has enough space for my needs. Would I be hurting myself by not upgrading to a new hard drive? My case is an ANTEC, i'm not really sure of the model. But the dimensions are roughly 15.5 in x 7.5 in x 16in. I'm guessing I'll need a new power supply as my old one is only 350W. Some suggestions here based on my other parts needs would be awesome. On Newegg my total for CPU, GPU, mobo, & RAM is $395 right. I'm trying to keep this under $500. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Edit: Another question: When would be a good time to buy? I can wait a few months. I noticed a lot of graphic card reviews dated around late september, early october of 2009 so is that a time when new lines come out? Thanks! Hi, http://www.newegg.com/Product/ComboDealDetails.aspx?ItemList=Combo.470418http://www.newegg.com/Product/ComboDealDetails.aspx?ItemList=Combo.457048http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128431$450, what do you think? See CPU review here: http://www.anandtech.com/show/2923/6Also, I would definitely recommend upgrading to a more modern drive. Not only is the SATA interface much faster than IDE, the drives themselves are much faster as well. Think about picking up a Western Digital Caviar Black if you can. I don't know why you recommended that CPU and RAM, both are terrible choices. The Athlon II X3 and G-Skill that he picked out are much much better. I would go with the Gigabyte motherboard. That foxcon one looks pretty bad. While the GTS 460 is awesome, the 5770 is just as good value for money, especially for a budget build. I would bump up to a 460 if you can afford it though. You should pick up a Spinpoint F3 rather than a caviar black, same performance and the spinpoint is cheaper. For a power supply, the OCZ Fatal1ty should be just fine. The Athlon X2 and X3 perform about at the same level. The X2 will edge out the X3 because you get a faster core speed for cheaper, vs an extra core that some apps may not use. So with my build, you get a comparably fast cpu and a stellar gpu. Lastly, the OCZ stick offers far better timings and a heatspreader over the gskill? Myrmidon's build offers the best cpu selection. No, the Athlon II X3 is still a better choice than either the phenom x2 or the athlon x2 for gaming. The extra core has been shown time and time again to be much better than a small increase in clock speed, even in games that aren't properly threaded yet like starcraft 2. The only reason you would get the Phenom X2 over the athlon X3 is because of the unlocked multiplier which makes it much easier to overclock. Recently OCZ ram is notoriously bad. You have to be very luck to find a pair with both sticks working perfectly. After paying shipping for RMAing a few times, the low price won't seem quite as nice anymore. do you want to show me where the X3 is so amazingly better than the X2? As I've provided one link. Here's another: http://techreport.com/articles.x/18448/6Dirt 2 and MW2 make use of extra cores. SC2 doesn't: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/blizzard-entertainment-starcraft-ii-benchmark,2611-9.html http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-gaming-cpu-core-i5-760-core-i7-970,2698-2.htmlhttp://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/multi-core-cpu,2280-11.htmlhttp://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/cpu-cores-performance,2373-12.htmlEven the link you posted on SC2 says: 'A triple-core CPU at 2.8 GHz or more should be able to provide all the performance you'd want for StarCraft II.' I'm done for now, if you want to argue more take it to PM. dude what. just look at the bench, two -> three cores nets you like 1 fps. i mean i agree the x3 is an overall better buy but it doesn't really matter if we're just talking about sc2.
I'm talking about gaming in general, not just SC2. Sc2 was just an example. Also those benches are from the beta, and its been threaded better since then, though not by much.
|
On August 29 2010 03:54 Myrmidon wrote:Price in parenthesis were shipping costs on a per-item basis. Definitely go with that ASUS mobo instead, even though it's microATX and a relatively low-end ASUS part. If you want to get with the times, you could try a AM3 motherboard and DDR3 RAM, but it's probably not worth the extra cost. The Biostar probably shouldn't be an issue, but it's not worth trying out Biostar IMO. Other possible upgrades would be getting 4 GB RAM, this case with the same PSU as before, and this GPU. Generally with budget builds, the biggest concern may be explode-in-your-face (well, explode-in-your-case) PSUs, but that's not an issue here.
whats difference do cases make? the one you said to get here is $30 cheaper than the one you said before so that makes up for the extra cost of the video card. is this one better?
also will the ASUS mobo work with this case? and is a microATX just a smaller mobo?
how much more would an AM3 mobo and DDR3 ram be worth? and is the difference in performance large?
if i upgrade to 4GB of ram should i just go with 2-2GB sticks and should I stick with Crucial? http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820148111 is that the right ram?
|
Difference in cases are usually cooling performance, amount of fans preinstalled, amount of fans able to be installed later, expansion slots, material used to make it, ease of installation, etc. That said the case he suggested is fine. If you ever overclock you might need to add more fans later on, however. It's definitely worth the boost in graphics.
Yes the mobo will work. microATX is a smaller form factor that's usually more than enough for a casual user.
An AM3 mobo will make you use DDR3 which if you ever plan to swap out the processor/mobo for some next-gen processor you should be able to reuse the DDR3, saving money. As far as I know there is some performance difference between DDR2 and DDR3 but it's not significant enough if you're on a budget. It's better to put those resources elsewhere.
|
So, I made a post a while ago: + Show Spoiler [Original Post] +On August 23 2010 02:59 Mystor wrote: Hey, I would be interested in some help with a build for a computer My budget is in the range of $600-$800 CAD, not including monitor, keyboard and mouse (as I already own them) My current screen resolution on my monitor is 1280x1024, however I plan to eventually purchace a better primary monitor (It would be nice for the computer to be able to support both of the monitors, if you have a monitor suggestion that would be appreciated as well.) I would be using this computer for gaming (RPGs and RTSs) as well as basic coding and graphics/word processing. I am not looking for a powerful computer for running photoshop however. The hope is that I would be able to play starcraft 2 and games like WoW on highest settings. This computer would be expected to be sufficient for around 3 years before I plan to perform a major upgrade on it. I plan on building this computer sometime during September. I do not plan on Overclocking this computer. I already have an operating system, I do not need to purchase it as well. I do not plan on adding a second GPU using Crossfire (It probably wouldn't fit in my budget anyways). I plan on buying as many components as possible in Canada. I live in Calgary, so my best bet may be to purchase these components on the internet through a site like newegg.ca.
Thanks in advance for your help. The nice Myrmidon helped me find a build, however my budget has increased a bit, and I was wondering if there was any specific part of the build I should upgrade or if I should simply invest in a spectacular monitor (monitor suggestions would be nice too).
My current build is below: + Show Spoiler [All from Newegg.ca, I live in Canada] + Thanks in advance for your help.
|
|
|
Hey guys, this is probably going to be my last post in this thread asking about my own computer until I'm putting it together and posting pictures. Although I swore I've said that at least twice.
So for my mobo, I was going to grab an EVGA x58 SLI LE for 160 on Newegg. However, I just discovered EVGA's backstock page on their website. I can pick up an EVGA x58 SLI for 140, versus the 190 I would have to pay pre-rebate for the other SLI LE. And if I wanted to I could get the SLI LE for 120 from backstock. However, my real question comes with the text to the side of the product.
It says it does not come with any accessories. This has kind of left me confused. Does it not come with any cables at all? This worries me, because after looking at a review for the product there's a lot of things that could be considered "accessories" and would not come with the board. (http://www.guru3d.com/article/evga-x58-sli-review/5)
If it just doesn't come with some SATA cables or something, I think I'll be fine, because I can just order those for pretty low prices, right? But what I'm worried about is what if it doesn't come with a power cord or something like that. If anybody has any experience with backstock ordering and such any help would be much appreciated.
EDIT: Upon further searching I've found my answer. It only comes with an I/O plate, and I dunno if I really wanna waste time and money ordering everything else when I can just get the SLI LE and send in the rebate. Anyone have an opinion on this matter they'd like to share?
|
|
|
|
|
|