|
When using this resource, please read FragKrag's opening post. The Tech Support forum regulars have helped create countless of desktop systems without any compensation. The least you can do is provide all of the information required for them to help you properly. |
This is incorrect. Both the 7870 and the 660 will run SC2 on maximum settings on any resolution. Because monitors can only display so many FPS (and in late game stages the limiting factor will be the CPU), the 7870 and 660 in fact have exactly equal SC2 performance.
Also, I hear the 7870 is a better overclocker, if you like that kind of thing. I'd recommend the 7870, but it's a close call.
|
On September 28 2012 08:35 MisterFred wrote:Stream SC2 at ultra and max FPS? No. Max FPS for most monitors is 60, and no processor in the world can handle large army sizes onscreen in SC2 at 60fps let alone when streaming. Note that ultra is easy to do, the problem is AI & pathing calculations when hundreds of zerglings are streaming across creep. But that's not really your question. What you mean to ask is can I build a credible streaming computer that won't make my SC2 feel slow while maxing SC2 graphics. The answer there is a qualified Yes. Assuming you already have monitor, keyboard, headphones, etc., the tower itself for a streaming computer can certainly be had under 1k. Why the qualification? SC2 is really easy to run graphically. So if you also want to run ultra settings on OTHER games, budgeting becomes a lot harder. I see, pardon my ignorance, I'm a bit new to this. I'm just sick of having a computer where I cannot get more than 5 fps in anything above 150 food battles. I suppose 'max fps' is a bit to ask for, but I just need something playable.
|
Budget - $1000 Purpose - Gaming, watching movies, etc. Parts needed - Everything except monitor/other peripherals Resolution - 1920 x 1080 Overclocking - I'm not sure. I'm not familiar with overclocking at all and would be a little scared to do this. Upgrade Cycle - Would like this to remain as a decent computer for at least 2 years. OS - Don't need one. All I need are PC parts.
I'm giving myself about 30-60 days to get all the parts. I've seen some good deals during the past few days, but the thought "maybe if I wait another month, this will be cheaper anyway" has been holding me back from pulling the trigger.
Do you think the price on GTX670 is going to drop sometime by November?
|
@Sein - The question in the OP about your resolution is trying to get you to tell us your monitor. It's important, because the higher the resolution, the more expensive graphics card you need for the same quality settings (higher resolutions look sharper even with larger screen sizes though). So if you already have a monitor, tell us what your current one is if you don't know its native (max) resolution. As for things getting cheaper - generally most computer parts don't drop in price fast (if at all), once they've been out for a month or two. There's a variety of reasons for that... but the upshot is as for a list of parts when you want to buy, because deals change, so what's the point of asking if you're not ready to buy?
On September 28 2012 12:02 9-BiT wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2012 08:35 MisterFred wrote:On September 28 2012 08:24 9-BiT wrote:How much should I be expecting to pay for a build to stream sc2 at ultra and max fps? Internet is not a problem http://www.speedtest.net/result/2207015519.pngCan I pay 1k and do it? Thank you data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" Stream SC2 at ultra and max FPS? No. Max FPS for most monitors is 60, and no processor in the world can handle large army sizes onscreen in SC2 at 60fps let alone when streaming. Note that ultra is easy to do, the problem is AI & pathing calculations when hundreds of zerglings are streaming across creep. But that's not really your question. What you mean to ask is can I build a credible streaming computer that won't make my SC2 feel slow while maxing SC2 graphics. The answer there is a qualified Yes. Assuming you already have monitor, keyboard, headphones, etc., the tower itself for a streaming computer can certainly be had under 1k. Why the qualification? SC2 is really easy to run graphically. So if you also want to run ultra settings on OTHER games, budgeting becomes a lot harder. I see, pardon my ignorance, I'm a bit new to this. I'm just sick of having a computer where I cannot get more than 5 fps in anything above 150 food battles. I suppose 'max fps' is a bit to ask for, but I just need something playable.
Fill out the full questionnaire in the OP and make sure to specify your uses for the computer (what other games you play, and if high graphics settings are important to you). If you don't know your resolution, just specify your monitor. Overclocking isn't for everyone, but it isn't that hard and can be beneficial if you want to stream at high quality without some minor slowdowns in late game SC2.
You might also want to include your current setup if you think you might want to cannibalize parts from your existing computer rather than use it as a hand-me-down or something.
|
On September 28 2012 16:40 MisterFred wrote:@Sein - The question in the OP about your resolution is trying to get you to tell us your monitor. It's important, because the higher the resolution, the more expensive graphics card you need for the same quality settings (higher resolutions look sharper even with larger screen sizes though). So if you already have a monitor, tell us what your current one is if you don't know its native (max) resolution. As for things getting cheaper - generally most computer parts don't drop in price fast (if at all), once they've been out for a month or two. There's a variety of reasons for that... but the upshot is as for a list of parts when you want to buy, because deals change, so what's the point of asking if you're not ready to buy? Show nested quote +On September 28 2012 12:02 9-BiT wrote:On September 28 2012 08:35 MisterFred wrote:On September 28 2012 08:24 9-BiT wrote:How much should I be expecting to pay for a build to stream sc2 at ultra and max fps? Internet is not a problem http://www.speedtest.net/result/2207015519.pngCan I pay 1k and do it? Thank you data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" Stream SC2 at ultra and max FPS? No. Max FPS for most monitors is 60, and no processor in the world can handle large army sizes onscreen in SC2 at 60fps let alone when streaming. Note that ultra is easy to do, the problem is AI & pathing calculations when hundreds of zerglings are streaming across creep. But that's not really your question. What you mean to ask is can I build a credible streaming computer that won't make my SC2 feel slow while maxing SC2 graphics. The answer there is a qualified Yes. Assuming you already have monitor, keyboard, headphones, etc., the tower itself for a streaming computer can certainly be had under 1k. Why the qualification? SC2 is really easy to run graphically. So if you also want to run ultra settings on OTHER games, budgeting becomes a lot harder. I see, pardon my ignorance, I'm a bit new to this. I'm just sick of having a computer where I cannot get more than 5 fps in anything above 150 food battles. I suppose 'max fps' is a bit to ask for, but I just need something playable. Fill out the full questionnaire in the OP and make sure to specify your uses for the computer (what other games you play, and if high graphics settings are important to you). If you don't know your resolution, just specify your monitor. Overclocking isn't for everyone, but it isn't that hard and can be beneficial if you want to stream at high quality without some minor slowdowns in late game SC2. You might also want to include your current setup if you think you might want to cannibalize parts from your existing computer rather than use it as a hand-me-down or something.
Oh I see. Thanks for letting me know and I have edited my previous post to include the resolution of my monitor. It's not that I'm not ready to buy, but rather that instead of getting every part in a span of a few days, I was going to give myself more time to get them one at a time as really good deals come along. Is this not a good idea?
|
Not a good idea during this season.
Black Friday is in two months. One of two things will happen, you're going to regret not waiting for Black Friday or regret not purchasing x during the time before Black Friday.
Most people tend to overspend or misallocate their budget due to ignorance or the simple fact that they can't help it.
Since it's the high-end, more premium products that get the largest discounts. Chances are good, you're going to be spending more than you planned. A $110 SeasonicX 750 sounds much better than a Capstone 450-M you can get for $40 less right now. A 256gb SSD for ~$160 sounds much better than a 128gb SSD for ~$70 less.
If parts are DOA, you're going to be dealing with multiple manufacturers instead of just one or a few retailers.
|
On September 29 2012 02:08 skyR wrote: Not a good idea during this season.
Black Friday is in two months. One of two things will happen, you're going to regret not waiting for Black Friday or regret not purchasing x during the time before Black Friday.
Most people tend to overspend or misallocate their budget due to ignorance or the simple fact that they can't help it.
Since it's the high-end, more premium products that get the largest discounts. Chances are good, you're going to be spending more than you planned. A $110 SeasonicX 750 sounds much better than a Capstone 450-M you can get for $40 less right now. A 256gb SSD for ~$160 sounds much better than a 128gb SSD for ~$70 less.
If parts are DOA, you're going to be dealing with multiple manufacturers instead of just one or a few retailers.
What I've heard from a few friends is that BF usually has only low to mid-range products on big sales. Would you agree with this?
|
On September 29 2012 02:44 Sein wrote:Show nested quote +On September 29 2012 02:08 skyR wrote: Not a good idea during this season.
Black Friday is in two months. One of two things will happen, you're going to regret not waiting for Black Friday or regret not purchasing x during the time before Black Friday.
Most people tend to overspend or misallocate their budget due to ignorance or the simple fact that they can't help it.
Since it's the high-end, more premium products that get the largest discounts. Chances are good, you're going to be spending more than you planned. A $110 SeasonicX 750 sounds much better than a Capstone 450-M you can get for $40 less right now. A 256gb SSD for ~$160 sounds much better than a 128gb SSD for ~$70 less.
If parts are DOA, you're going to be dealing with multiple manufacturers instead of just one or a few retailers. What I've heard from a few friends is that BF usually has only low to mid-range products on big sales. Would you agree with this?
Low to mid range products frequently start at somewhat lower margins and markups than high end products, so they're harder to put on "big" sale.
Plus, to the average consumer, buying a whole lot of features (some of which most don't understand or use) at say, 20-40% off, sounds more impressive than buying what they actually have a use for at 10-15% off.
They fall into the trap of "more future-proof, for only a little more money" without knowing what it means, or that it's frequently a false savings.
If you buy a car, and get all kinds of extra features, but it's on sale, and "only" pay 10% more than you would have for the one without the features, but you never actually use, say, the in-dash navigation and four wheel drive, was the "sale" really a savings?
|
On September 27 2012 11:39 Shikyo wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2012 05:43 FlyingToilet wrote:On September 27 2012 04:10 PoweredbyYogurt wrote: wut Amd phenom II's are decent if you wanna save money and get a decent cpu, only the 6 core edition is worth it, i went with this processor and trust me it's way more worth it if you save up and wait till you can afford a intel processor... Just don't buy an fx or a bulldozer, its like picking an xbox over a 360 for the same price The 6 core's actually not worth it at all, ...Even the 70 dollar last-generation G850 is better for most games than the 6core phenom, and you'll likely save the same amount over time with lower energy bills(and have better upgrade prospects) I can agree with the pentiums being better for gaming overall, pentiums are actually pretty nice! I just like the 6 core for streaming, it seems to suit me well for 720p and constant gaming...I was actually thinking about going for intel's new gen or maybe an ivy in early 2013 when i plan on upgrading my pc for better resolution in streaming, seems like a steep investment though...
But ya i can't argue with you on the pentiums being better than the x6 i got a friend that smokes my processor and its an E5700 @ 4.133GHZ, mines only a whopping 2.7 ghz lol
|
Budget - $1200 Purpose - Gaming, streaming. Only will be streaming sc2 and tf2 Parts needed - Monitor, and all parts Resolution - none yet Overclocking - A bit intimated, but it's an option Upgrade Cycle - This will need to last me a while OS - I need one. Windows.
|
I had a question about cases. I've been looking around, and the ones I've see the most are the Cooler Master 922, Antec PXXX (whatever model they happen to be talking about), and the Corsair storm. I don't think I need more than a mid sized tower- I have one that, based on its dimensions, I think is considered a small case. Still fits all of my parts. The problem is, it has crap airflow. The temperature in my room can be quite hot as well and my processor reflects this fact. What is a good mid price ($100-$120ish) tower? I think the longest part is the video card. I would just buy the 922 or the equivalent Antec, but I didn't know if there was anything else I should consider that I might not know about.
I would like one that will last me a while (hence why I want a mid size case). Sound is really a secondary concern, cooling and price are priority.
Sapphire 7950 (I think around 11 inches). Motherboard: 990FX professional (ATX style/size) Processor: Phenom II X4 965 (I heard they don't like to be hot, and I really don't think 70+ C in TF2 should be happening. This with the side off and a fan blowing on it. It's hotter with the side on.)
Thanks!
|
5930 Posts
Where have you lived in the last 3 years? AMD hasn't been worth buying except for the lowest end systems.
Airflow isn't going to help if your ambient temperature is high. If your desktop is overheating and you haven't put a blanket over it, you've got bigger problems like poorly mounted heatsinks.
|
On September 29 2012 08:51 Womwomwom wrote: Where have you lived in the last 3 years? AMD hasn't been worth buying except for the lowest end systems.
Airflow isn't going to help if your ambient temperature is high. If your desktop is overheating and you haven't put a blanket over it, you've got bigger problems like poorly mounted heatsinks.
Actually, I'm pretty sure it's been at least that long since I bought it. The issue is that my board is AMD, so I would need a new board AND the processor. (I do imagine a 600W PSU would still be good for whatever I would get?) Besides, this CPU is relatively well liked
Well I think part of the heat issue is location, and part is airflow. The circulation really is bad, this case has one fan on the back. It is the last original part from when I first had this computer made. And it's mainly the processor that gets hot, the rest (at least the GPU) is fine, although the RAM gets quite hot to the touch. I was told not to worry about that as much tho. I will check yet again my mounting of the heatsink and the amount of thermal paste. I do think I over did that.
Point is, I am fairly certain I need a new case. If it is running those temps when not even at full load and everything is installed correctly, I think it simply needs more air. Could be wrong though.
|
If it's 70c during idle than no you did not install the heatsink correctly...
|
On September 29 2012 09:12 skyR wrote: If it's 70c during idle than no you did not install the heatsink correctly...
Not idle, sorry if that's what I said. 70 when playing a game such as TF2 (I think CS:GO was a similar temp, maybe a little cooler. From what I could tell of the different graphs, it wasn't under full load. Maybe I was reading it wrong.)
I'm idling at 40 C right now.
Also I could be wrong about an intel not working with my board, I just didn't see any info that said it was compatible, but someone in one of the processor reviews said they put the chip (an intel) in the board I have. I am still a tech noob, but trying to learn.
|
Hi,
Here's my outline. I've chosen most parts and wanted some critique
What is your budget?
$1500
What is your resolution?
1920x1080
What are you using it for?
Mostly gaming.
What is your upgrade cycle?
1-2years
When do you plan on building it?
next 2 or 3 weeks
Do you plan on overclocking?
Yes
Do you need an Operating System?
No
Do you plan to add a second GPU for SLI or Crossfire?
No
Where are you buying your parts from?
Australia, http://www.pccasegear.com
--------------------------------------------------------- Intel Core i5 3570K CoolerMaster Hyper 212 EVO CPU Cooler Gigabyte Radeon HD7950 3GB Overclocked
Thermaltake Level 10 GTS Mid Tower Case Black ASRock Z77 PRO4-M Motherboard
Antec High Current Gamer 520W Modular HCG-520M Dell S2330MX 23in Ultra-Slim LED Monitor G.Skill Ares F3-1600C9D-8GAO 8GB (2x4GB) DDR3 TP-Link TL-WN751ND Wireless PCI Adapter Plextor PX-128M5S 128GB SSD Samsung SH-224BB/BEBS SATA DVDRW Drive OEM Seagate Barracuda 2TB ST2000DM001
Thanks in advance for any advice
|
5930 Posts
On September 29 2012 09:17 Introvert wrote:Show nested quote +On September 29 2012 09:12 skyR wrote: If it's 70c during idle than no you did not install the heatsink correctly... Not idle, sorry if that's what I said. 70 when playing a game such as TF2 (I think CS:GO was a similar temp, maybe a little cooler. From what I could tell of the different graphs, it wasn't under full load. Maybe I was reading it wrong.) I'm idling at 40 C right now. Also I could be wrong about an intel not working with my board, I just didn't see any info that said it was compatible, but someone in one of the processor reviews said they put the chip (an intel) in the board I have. I am still a tech noob, but trying to learn.
40 degree idle/70 degree load is normal. That's how it should be. Getting more airflow is pointless, its aimed at stupid people. If you have unobstructed air going in and out, then there is no way a basic unoverclocked system is going to overheat.
I misread your post. You already have the AMD motherboard and processor...I thought you were going to buy an entirely new computer. If you were going to buy a new computer, you should get Intel everything. No, you cannot put an Intel chip into that motherboard. They won't even fit, that review you read is factually incorrect.
Even then, I don't know why you bought that system (since the 990 motherboard are pretty recents) because its a huge waste of money. Technology is one area where tribalism is huge so if lots of people say so and so is good, it does not mean its actually good. You have to use some critical thinking to figure out why something is good.
Its like how people to this day still have a (let's be honest here) racist boner for British hifi equipment, when in fact a lot of the hardware is expensive and frankly not that great (Cambridge Audio's low end for instance). But they will keep telling themselves that American, Nordic, and Japanese hardware is somehow inferior. There's no basis in such opinions.
Unlike hifi, computer hardware is easier to figure out. There's actual benchmarks and these benchmarks can be found on many, many websites. From such benchmarks, you will see that there isn't really a single thing AMD processors are good at anymore: worse performance, not really price competitive outside of cores, much worse power draw, worse heat output, shittier power management features in BIOS, worse chipsets, etc.
|
On September 29 2012 10:46 Womwomwom wrote:Show nested quote +On September 29 2012 09:17 Introvert wrote:On September 29 2012 09:12 skyR wrote: If it's 70c during idle than no you did not install the heatsink correctly... Not idle, sorry if that's what I said. 70 when playing a game such as TF2 (I think CS:GO was a similar temp, maybe a little cooler. From what I could tell of the different graphs, it wasn't under full load. Maybe I was reading it wrong.) I'm idling at 40 C right now. Also I could be wrong about an intel not working with my board, I just didn't see any info that said it was compatible, but someone in one of the processor reviews said they put the chip (an intel) in the board I have. I am still a tech noob, but trying to learn. 40 degree idle/70 degree load is normal. That's how it should be. Getting more airflow is pointless, its aimed at stupid people. If you have unobstructed air going in and out, then there is no way a basic unoverclocked system is going to overheat. I misread your post. You already have the AMD motherboard and processor...I thought you were going to buy an entirely new computer. If you were going to buy a new computer, you should get Intel everything. No, you cannot put an Intel chip into that motherboard. They won't even fit, that review you read is factually incorrect. Even then, I don't know why you bought that system (since the 990 motherboard are pretty recents) because its a huge waste of money. Technology is one area where tribalism is huge so if lots of people say so and so is good, it does not mean its actually good. You have to use some critical thinking to figure out why something is good. Its like how people to this day still have a (let's be honest here) racist boner for British hifi equipment, when in fact a lot of the hardware is expensive and frankly not that great (Cambridge Audio's low end for instance). But they will keep telling themselves that American, Nordic, and Japanese hardware is somehow inferior. There's no basis in such opinions. Unlike hifi, computer hardware is easier to figure out. There's actual benchmarks and these benchmarks can be found on many, many websites. From such benchmarks, you will see that there isn't really a single thing AMD processors are good at anymore: worse performance, not really price competitive outside of cores, much worse power draw, worse heat output, shittier power management features in BIOS, worse chipsets, etc.
ok, I had posted earlier in the thread and I was getting the vibe that 70 was on the hot side for this chip. If that is incorrect, then so be it. I guess if it dies it will force me to upgrade If i wanted to overclock to get more life out of it, I suppose I would need a new case. (I suppose then the question is, why not just use that money on a new processor/board?)
I did a little Google-ing: This is why it is taking me so long to learn about such things. All of these people seem to say 70 C is way too hot. No offence, but it's your opinion (a person on the internet) vs their opinion (other people on the internet). This is why I am so annoyed by this whole thing: http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/295183-28-phenom-temp http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/276754-29-phenom http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/329458-28-phenom-maximum-temperature http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2215506
I bought the board because it would work with the processor, I didn't think (and don't think) it will be changing any time soon. I have no preconceived ideas about technology, and like I said I got this processor a couple years ago, back when it was good. I still obviously admit to my ignorance, but even had I known when I bought the board around this time last year, at that time there was no way I could have afforded a new board and new processor. Simply not possible; even now it would be a debatable expenditure.
To reiterate, I bought the board and processor at separate times, and at both of those times it was infeasible to buy both. If I had the money, I obviously would have gone all out. It's not like I bought this stuff yesterday.
It seems to me however, that before/with my next upgrade, I will need a new case. Thus, I would like suggestions/advice. Have pity on the learning uninformed. Thank you for taking your time to respond.
|
Them saying 70c is too hot is retarded. There's a reason the processor isn't underclocking itself at 70. Because it's perfectly fine running at them temperature. You get to 85/90 then you need to worry. Also, if you wanted to OC you wouldn't need a new case. You'd need a new heatsink.
|
On September 29 2012 14:47 Infernal_dream wrote: Them saying 70c is too hot is retarded. There's a reason the processor isn't underclocking itself at 70. Because it's perfectly fine running at them temperature. You get to 85/90 then you need to worry. Also, if you wanted to OC you wouldn't need a new case. You'd need a new heatsink.
I found this: http://products.amd.com/pages/desktopcpudetail.aspx?id=617&f1=&f2=&f3=&f4=&f5=&f6=&f7=&f8=&f9=&f10=&f11=&f12=&AspxAutoDetectCo
Consider me confused. I suppose this is just a "to be safe" temp? (I guess that should be obvious. I just don't like the idea of it being over the recommended temp. But I suppose it can last until Black Friday.) Still, 8 degrees seems significant. Thanks for your patience and help
|
|
|
|