• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 21:53
CEST 03:53
KST 10:53
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview4[ASL21] Finals Preview: Two Legacies21Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO12 Preview2herO wins GSL Code S Season 1 (2026)6Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO4 & Finals Preview5
Community News
Weekly Cups (May 18-25): MaxPax wins doubles0Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League4Weekly Cups (May 11-17): Classic wins double0Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO8 Results2Weekly Cups (May 4-10): Clem, MaxPax, herO win1
StarCraft 2
General
herO wins GSL Code S Season 1 (2026) Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview Weekly Cups (May 18-25): MaxPax wins doubles Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO12 Preview Weekly Cups (May 11-17): Classic wins double
Tourneys
GSL Code S Season 2 (2026) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League GSL Code S Season 1 (2026) Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule !
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players
External Content
Mutation # 527 Hell Train The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 526 Rubber and Glue Mutation # 525 Wheel of Misfortune
Brood War
General
Pros React To: ASL S21 Finals BW General Discussion Very long shot - StarCraft x A7X video Pros React to: TvT Masterclass in FlaSh vs Light vespene.gg — BW replays in browser
Tourneys
[ASL21] Grand Finals [BSL22] WB Final & LB Semis - Saturday 21:00 CEST [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2
Strategy
Any training maps people recommend? Muta micro map competition [G] Hydra ZvZ: An Introduction Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile ZeroSpace Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Trading/Investing Thread Dating: How's your luck? European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Facing Challenges in Mobile App Development streaming software
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Customization Drives Loyalty…
TrAiDoS
Why RTS gamers make better f…
gosubay
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1985 users

SC2 5.0.15 PTR Patch Notes + Sept 22nd update - Page 3

Forum Index > SC2 General
315 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 14 15 16 Next All
TeamMamba
Profile Joined June 2025
216 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-09-18 21:14:02
September 18 2025 21:13 GMT
#41
Is this a joke?

Storm gets nerf to the ground. Storm was something that toss could rely against bio ball. Now it’s total garbage. If they gonna nerf storm at least buff the col and distributor. Also basically timing attack from Zerg with hydra ling bane will have a 100% win rate

Viper cannot abduct siege tanks? lol clown idea

@wombat. The wombat patch got nerf. What you think ?

CicadaSC
Profile Joined January 2018
United States1917 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-09-18 21:24:36
September 18 2025 21:23 GMT
#42
This is exactly what I have been hoping for, sort of.

Big exciting changes are what we need. Shake up the game because it feels stale right now. NOT balance tweaks. Radical changes. I wanna see pros play this.
Remember that we all come from a place of passion!!
monitor
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2409 Posts
September 18 2025 21:43 GMT
#43
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.
https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/Monitor
Zidane
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
United States1689 Posts
September 18 2025 21:52 GMT
#44
Give templars Siege Tank Range and I'll take the storm nerf
LaughNgamezSOOP
Profile Joined June 2024
68 Posts
September 18 2025 22:46 GMT
#45
Blizzard may as well not patch when we get barely communicated garbage once a year if we're lucky. Patches need to be every 3-6 months or at least have a revisionary patch instead of sticking us with garbage.
Literally the greatest caster ever: https://www.youtube.com/@LaughNgamed
RogueTheGOAT
Profile Joined July 2025
166 Posts
September 18 2025 22:47 GMT
#46
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.
Balnazza
Profile Joined January 2018
Germany1287 Posts
September 18 2025 23:27 GMT
#47
On September 19 2025 07:47 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.


Removing the Mothership Core was somewhat easy. Removing the Queen would literally mean to entirely re-design the Zerg-race.
You might not know this, but Zerg players don't use Queens because they are "lul OP", they use them because there is literally no chance in hell to survive the first 5-7 minutes without them...
"Wenn die Zauberin runter geht, dann macht sie die Beine breit" - Khaldor, trying to cast WC3 German-only
Vindicare605
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States16121 Posts
September 18 2025 23:47 GMT
#48
On September 19 2025 08:27 Balnazza wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 07:47 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.


Removing the Mothership Core was somewhat easy. Removing the Queen would literally mean to entirely re-design the Zerg-race.
You might not know this, but Zerg players don't use Queens because they are "lul OP", they use them because there is literally no chance in hell to survive the first 5-7 minutes without them...


Agreed.

Removing Queens would be as difficult to do as removing Warp Gate would be. You'd need to completely retool the race and totally change around their tech tree in order to make up for all of the things Queens currently do for Zerg.

Is it a good idea to change Zerg so they aren't so dependent on this one catch all of a unit? Absolutely. But it's not as easy as just taking the Mothership Core out. The Mothership core was JUST a defensive bandaid, one that they were able to replace with Shield Batteries. Queens are a defensive bandaid, a very important map control tool, and a production enhancer. Zerg would need replacement mechanics for all of those in order to completely replace the Queen.

Good idea? I think so. But it would be difficult to implement.
aka: KTVindicare the Geeky Bartender
Glorfindelio
Profile Joined October 2022
223 Posts
September 18 2025 23:57 GMT
#49
On September 19 2025 08:47 Vindicare605 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 08:27 Balnazza wrote:
On September 19 2025 07:47 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.


Removing the Mothership Core was somewhat easy. Removing the Queen would literally mean to entirely re-design the Zerg-race.
You might not know this, but Zerg players don't use Queens because they are "lul OP", they use them because there is literally no chance in hell to survive the first 5-7 minutes without them...


Agreed.

Removing Queens would be as difficult to do as removing Warp Gate would be. You'd need to completely retool the race and totally change around their tech tree in order to make up for all of the things Queens currently do for Zerg.

Is it a good idea to change Zerg so they aren't so dependent on this one catch all of a unit? Absolutely. But it's not as easy as just taking the Mothership Core out. The Mothership core was JUST a defensive bandaid, one that they were able to replace with Shield Batteries. Queens are a defensive bandaid, a very important map control tool, and a production enhancer. Zerg would need replacement mechanics for all of those in order to completely replace the Queen.

Good idea? I think so. But it would be difficult to implement.


All good points. Beyond just the balance implications, we'd also be removing maybe the single most foundational mechanical aspect of the entire race--hell, maybe of all three races. Your basic cycle/rhythm from the moment you start Zerg is based around Queen injects and spreading creep and moving them accordingly. Taking them out would be burning a decade of muscle memory away for players.
monitor
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2409 Posts
September 18 2025 23:58 GMT
#50
In favor of queens being removed but yes you’d have to completely rework Z (and of course same with removing warpgate - or making it slower than gateways - would also be a huge rework)!
https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/Monitor
RogueTheGOAT
Profile Joined July 2025
166 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-09-19 00:08:20
September 19 2025 00:06 GMT
#51
On September 19 2025 08:27 Balnazza wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 07:47 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.


Removing the Mothership Core was somewhat easy. Removing the Queen would literally mean to entirely re-design the Zerg-race.
You might not know this, but Zerg players don't use Queens because they are "lul OP", they use them because there is literally no chance in hell to survive the first 5-7 minutes without them...

That literally described Protoss with the Mothership Core. After they removed it, they had to add Shield Batteries, but those weren't enough, so they added the overcharge ability, but then people complained, so that was removed and Energy Recharge was added, but then people complained, so that is being nerfed and storm gutted.

Larva production could be increased and Zerg players could invest further into macro hatcheries like they do in Brood War.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland26876 Posts
September 19 2025 00:08 GMT
#52
Protoss will get absolutely fucking butchered if those storm changes go through, what the fuck is that?

Terrans and Zergs will just run through it and kill you.

Luckily Toss can count on the Colossus to fill the AoE role. Wait, Vikings are also cheaper now?

The whole point of surveillance mode is just to stick observers in place, it always was. If that’s an issue, I’d argue nerf its vision range in that mode slightly, be less F2 friendly. Not the opposite. What’s the point in having observers with a bit more vision range that can be killed by anything that can shoot up?

Siege tanks can’t be abducted I also don’t like. Why siege tanks specifically? From my understanding a lot of non-pro players already struggle playing versus mech, so let’s make it harder?

Why not Collosus and Disruptors? Unless you hit a really sharp timing, Vipers render Robo-centric play borderline useless. Indeed, it’s why Toss players go Airtoss in the first place.

Other stuff, I think there’s some interesting tweaks, and other stuff I’m not sure on, but interested to see how it plays out.

The Templar change will completely make Toss unviable at the top level at least, there’s nothing to compensate properly. Templars now suck, so you have to look at another AoE option. Well, if it’s Colossus Terran can squeeze more Vikings out, and Disruptors are already suffering from their last nerf.

In PvZ if Temps now suck, you will just die. Either you play the current meta, and Zergs will just run through your storms and kill you, or you adapt and go Robo, and Zergs will make a few vipers and laugh at you
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Vindicare605
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States16121 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-09-19 00:12:51
September 19 2025 00:11 GMT
#53
On September 19 2025 09:06 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 08:27 Balnazza wrote:
On September 19 2025 07:47 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.


Removing the Mothership Core was somewhat easy. Removing the Queen would literally mean to entirely re-design the Zerg-race.
You might not know this, but Zerg players don't use Queens because they are "lul OP", they use them because there is literally no chance in hell to survive the first 5-7 minutes without them...

That literally described Protoss with the Mothership Core. After they removed it, they had to add Shield Batteries, but those weren't enough, so they added the overcharge ability, but then people complained, so that was removed and Energy Recharge was added, but then people complained, so that is being nerfed and storm gutted.

Larva production could be increased and Zerg players could invest further into macro hatcheries like they do in Brood War.


Queens also currently provide the only form of anti-air from a unit available before Lair, they are able to heal units and structures and Creep Tumors are currently one of the most powerful tools that any race has.

Even if you think that Creep should be nerfed, these are all simply MUCH bigger facets of the race than just what the Mothership Core used to provide. The fact that Protoss is still a work in progress for replacing that unit should give you an idea of how difficult it would be to remove Queens.

Like I said, the goal is a worthwhile one, but we couldn't even begin to try without serious consideration for everything involved in doing it.
aka: KTVindicare the Geeky Bartender
Vindicare605
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States16121 Posts
September 19 2025 00:13 GMT
#54
On September 19 2025 09:08 WombaT wrote:
Protoss will get absolutely fucking butchered if those storm changes go through, what the fuck is that?

Terrans and Zergs will just run through it and kill you.

Luckily Toss can count on the Colossus to fill the AoE role. Wait, Vikings are also cheaper now?

The whole point of surveillance mode is just to stick observers in place, it always was. If that’s an issue, I’d argue nerf its vision range in that mode slightly, be less F2 friendly. Not the opposite. What’s the point in having observers with a bit more vision range that can be killed by anything that can shoot up?

Siege tanks can’t be abducted I also don’t like. Why siege tanks specifically? From my understanding a lot of non-pro players already struggle playing versus mech, so let’s make it harder?

Why not Collosus and Disruptors? Unless you hit a really sharp timing, Vipers render Robo-centric play borderline useless. Indeed, it’s why Toss players go Airtoss in the first place.

Other stuff, I think there’s some interesting tweaks, and other stuff I’m not sure on, but interested to see how it plays out.

The Templar change will completely make Toss unviable at the top level at least, there’s nothing to compensate properly. Templars now suck, so you have to look at another AoE option. Well, if it’s Colossus Terran can squeeze more Vikings out, and Disruptors are already suffering from their last nerf.

In PvZ if Temps now suck, you will just die. Either you play the current meta, and Zergs will just run through your storms and kill you, or you adapt and go Robo, and Zergs will make a few vipers and laugh at you



Apparently the Storm change specifically we can directly blame on Harstem.

I seriously don't understand what the thought process is on it at all.
aka: KTVindicare the Geeky Bartender
RogueTheGOAT
Profile Joined July 2025
166 Posts
September 19 2025 00:35 GMT
#55
On September 19 2025 09:11 Vindicare605 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 09:06 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 08:27 Balnazza wrote:
On September 19 2025 07:47 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.


Removing the Mothership Core was somewhat easy. Removing the Queen would literally mean to entirely re-design the Zerg-race.
You might not know this, but Zerg players don't use Queens because they are "lul OP", they use them because there is literally no chance in hell to survive the first 5-7 minutes without them...

That literally described Protoss with the Mothership Core. After they removed it, they had to add Shield Batteries, but those weren't enough, so they added the overcharge ability, but then people complained, so that was removed and Energy Recharge was added, but then people complained, so that is being nerfed and storm gutted.

Larva production could be increased and Zerg players could invest further into macro hatcheries like they do in Brood War.


Queens also currently provide the only form of anti-air from a unit available before Lair, they are able to heal units and structures and Creep Tumors are currently one of the most powerful tools that any race has.

Even if you think that Creep should be nerfed, these are all simply MUCH bigger facets of the race than just what the Mothership Core used to provide. The fact that Protoss is still a work in progress for replacing that unit should give you an idea of how difficult it would be to remove Queens.

Like I said, the goal is a worthwhile one, but we couldn't even begin to try without serious consideration for everything involved in doing it.

You do know that Zerg used to have a hatchery tech anti-air unit, right?
Vindicare605
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States16121 Posts
September 19 2025 00:44 GMT
#56
On September 19 2025 09:35 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 09:11 Vindicare605 wrote:
On September 19 2025 09:06 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 08:27 Balnazza wrote:
On September 19 2025 07:47 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.


Removing the Mothership Core was somewhat easy. Removing the Queen would literally mean to entirely re-design the Zerg-race.
You might not know this, but Zerg players don't use Queens because they are "lul OP", they use them because there is literally no chance in hell to survive the first 5-7 minutes without them...

That literally described Protoss with the Mothership Core. After they removed it, they had to add Shield Batteries, but those weren't enough, so they added the overcharge ability, but then people complained, so that was removed and Energy Recharge was added, but then people complained, so that is being nerfed and storm gutted.

Larva production could be increased and Zerg players could invest further into macro hatcheries like they do in Brood War.


Queens also currently provide the only form of anti-air from a unit available before Lair, they are able to heal units and structures and Creep Tumors are currently one of the most powerful tools that any race has.

Even if you think that Creep should be nerfed, these are all simply MUCH bigger facets of the race than just what the Mothership Core used to provide. The fact that Protoss is still a work in progress for replacing that unit should give you an idea of how difficult it would be to remove Queens.

Like I said, the goal is a worthwhile one, but we couldn't even begin to try without serious consideration for everything involved in doing it.

You do know that Zerg used to have a hatchery tech anti-air unit, right?


Oh I'm aware, but say we move Hydralisks to Tier 1. Would they be balanced at Tier 1? I don't think so, especially vs Protoss, Hydralisk busts are already meta in ZvP in Brood War, and if Hydralisks got moved to Hatch Tech I certainly think they would become an issue in the match up.

That's only one issue I can think of happening if we just swap Hydralisks to tier 1 without any other changes.

This also still wouldn't change anything about Queens' other roles.
aka: KTVindicare the Geeky Bartender
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland26876 Posts
September 19 2025 00:45 GMT
#57
On September 19 2025 09:13 Vindicare605 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 09:08 WombaT wrote:
Protoss will get absolutely fucking butchered if those storm changes go through, what the fuck is that?

Terrans and Zergs will just run through it and kill you.

Luckily Toss can count on the Colossus to fill the AoE role. Wait, Vikings are also cheaper now?

The whole point of surveillance mode is just to stick observers in place, it always was. If that’s an issue, I’d argue nerf its vision range in that mode slightly, be less F2 friendly. Not the opposite. What’s the point in having observers with a bit more vision range that can be killed by anything that can shoot up?

Siege tanks can’t be abducted I also don’t like. Why siege tanks specifically? From my understanding a lot of non-pro players already struggle playing versus mech, so let’s make it harder?

Why not Collosus and Disruptors? Unless you hit a really sharp timing, Vipers render Robo-centric play borderline useless. Indeed, it’s why Toss players go Airtoss in the first place.

Other stuff, I think there’s some interesting tweaks, and other stuff I’m not sure on, but interested to see how it plays out.

The Templar change will completely make Toss unviable at the top level at least, there’s nothing to compensate properly. Templars now suck, so you have to look at another AoE option. Well, if it’s Colossus Terran can squeeze more Vikings out, and Disruptors are already suffering from their last nerf.

In PvZ if Temps now suck, you will just die. Either you play the current meta, and Zergs will just run through your storms and kill you, or you adapt and go Robo, and Zergs will make a few vipers and laugh at you



Apparently the Storm change specifically we can directly blame on Harstem.

I seriously don't understand what the thought process is on it at all.

I don’t doubt Harstem had the idea. Of pro players he’s quite reasonable in identifying potential issues with his own race, better than most.

But I would assume Harstem had a minor tweak in mind.

He probably said storm is brutally punishing, especially at lower levels and people maybe should get a little more time to mitigate the damage.

I doubt he advocated for a storm nerf that will basically enable you to just walk through it.
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
BonitiilloO
Profile Joined June 2013
Dominican Republic627 Posts
September 19 2025 00:57 GMT
#58
Queens do not need to be removed, they need to get a cost increase or a supply cost increase, the unit fills so many roles for the price/supply it cost.
How may help u?
TeamMamba
Profile Joined June 2025
216 Posts
September 19 2025 01:09 GMT
#59
On September 19 2025 09:08 WombaT wrote:
Protoss will get absolutely fucking butchered if those storm changes go through, what the fuck is that?

Terrans and Zergs will just run through it and kill you.

Luckily Toss can count on the Colossus to fill the AoE role. Wait, Vikings are also cheaper now?

The whole point of surveillance mode is just to stick observers in place, it always was. If that’s an issue, I’d argue nerf its vision range in that mode slightly, be less F2 friendly. Not the opposite. What’s the point in having observers with a bit more vision range that can be killed by anything that can shoot up?

Siege tanks can’t be abducted I also don’t like. Why siege tanks specifically? From my understanding a lot of non-pro players already struggle playing versus mech, so let’s make it harder?

Why not Collosus and Disruptors? Unless you hit a really sharp timing, Vipers render Robo-centric play borderline useless. Indeed, it’s why Toss players go Airtoss in the first place.

Other stuff, I think there’s some interesting tweaks, and other stuff I’m not sure on, but interested to see how it plays out.

The Templar change will completely make Toss unviable at the top level at least, there’s nothing to compensate properly. Templars now suck, so you have to look at another AoE option. Well, if it’s Colossus Terran can squeeze more Vikings out, and Disruptors are already suffering from their last nerf.

In PvZ if Temps now suck, you will just die. Either you play the current meta, and Zergs will just run through your storms and kill you, or you adapt and go Robo, and Zergs will make a few vipers and laugh at you


Bio ball will literally Stim a move and crush the toss army

Lings and banes literally laugh at it. Now banes will definitely connect no matter what

Basically Terran and Zergs no longer need to bait out storms. They just need to be decisive on the attack and run though it
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland26876 Posts
September 19 2025 01:11 GMT
#60
On September 19 2025 10:09 TeamMamba wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 09:08 WombaT wrote:
Protoss will get absolutely fucking butchered if those storm changes go through, what the fuck is that?

Terrans and Zergs will just run through it and kill you.

Luckily Toss can count on the Colossus to fill the AoE role. Wait, Vikings are also cheaper now?

The whole point of surveillance mode is just to stick observers in place, it always was. If that’s an issue, I’d argue nerf its vision range in that mode slightly, be less F2 friendly. Not the opposite. What’s the point in having observers with a bit more vision range that can be killed by anything that can shoot up?

Siege tanks can’t be abducted I also don’t like. Why siege tanks specifically? From my understanding a lot of non-pro players already struggle playing versus mech, so let’s make it harder?

Why not Collosus and Disruptors? Unless you hit a really sharp timing, Vipers render Robo-centric play borderline useless. Indeed, it’s why Toss players go Airtoss in the first place.

Other stuff, I think there’s some interesting tweaks, and other stuff I’m not sure on, but interested to see how it plays out.

The Templar change will completely make Toss unviable at the top level at least, there’s nothing to compensate properly. Templars now suck, so you have to look at another AoE option. Well, if it’s Colossus Terran can squeeze more Vikings out, and Disruptors are already suffering from their last nerf.

In PvZ if Temps now suck, you will just die. Either you play the current meta, and Zergs will just run through your storms and kill you, or you adapt and go Robo, and Zergs will make a few vipers and laugh at you


Bio ball will literally Stim a move and crush the toss army

Lings and banes literally laugh at it. Now banes will definitely connect no matter what

Basically Terran and Zergs no longer need to bait out storms. They just need to be decisive on the attack and run though it

Yep.

I’m not very good at the game, and even I think I could just engage through the new Storm, what the fuck is a Clem going to do?

I mean I know we’re in the phase of a bunch of ideas, not all will make it into an actual patch. But this, it just can’t make it in, it’s crazy
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 14 15 16 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
PiGosaur Cup #82
CranKy Ducklings130
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 94
ProTech69
StarCraft: Brood War
GuemChi 4382
Artosis 655
Dota 2
canceldota63
LuMiX0
League of Legends
Doublelift3812
Counter-Strike
taco 522
Super Smash Bros
AZ_Axe38
Other Games
summit1g11857
tarik_tv10649
hungrybox1327
C9.Mang0475
ViBE195
Maynarde166
Mew2King96
RuFF_SC223
minikerr6
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick816
BasetradeTV246
Counter-Strike
PGL173
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• EnkiAlexander 60
• Hupsaiya 48
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP16
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21466
League of Legends
• Stunt206
Upcoming Events
GSL
7h 37m
Maru vs SHIN
Zoun vs Rogue
WardiTV Spring Champion…
10h 7m
SKillous vs Strange
Lambo vs Strange
Ryung vs Strange
Lambo vs Ryung
Ryung vs SKillous
Lambo vs SKillous
OSC
17h 7m
Replay Cast
22h 7m
Maestros of the Game
1d 11h
Replay Cast
1d 22h
RSL Revival
2 days
Lambo vs SHIN
Solar vs Rogue
herO vs Clem
Maestros of the Game
2 days
IPSL
2 days
ZZZero vs WorsT
Julia vs eOnzErG
BSL
2 days
TerrOr vs Dewalt
Bonyth vs eOnzErG
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Maestros of the Game
3 days
IPSL
3 days
Dragon vs Artosis
dxtr13 vs Hawk
BSL
3 days
Wardi Open
4 days
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
WardiTV Spring Champion…
5 days
Maestros of the Game
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Maestros of the Game
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL Season 21
2026 GSL S1
Heroes Pulsing #1

Ongoing

2026 KK StarCraft Pro League
BSL Season 22
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
KK 2v2 League Season 1
Acropolis #4
CSCL: Masked Kings S4
SCTL 2026 Spring
WardiTV Spring 2026
2026 GSL S2
RSL Revival: Season 5
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: King of Kings
YSL S3
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
Bounty Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.