• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 01:22
CEST 07:22
KST 14:22
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2914Serral wins Maestros of the Game 243ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12
Community News
IntoTheTV X SOOP SC2 League : Weekly & Monthly4Clem: "I don't have that much hope in Blizzard"2ZeroSpace Early Access is Now Live!26Weekly Cups (July 13-19): Terran & Protoss rise; Zerg falters2Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16)90
StarCraft 2
General
How would you feel about frequent/monthly balance patches for SC2? Reynor: GSL Loss Wasn't About Preparation Format What's the best tug of war? Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) Clem: "I don't have that much hope in Blizzard"
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August) IntoTheTV X SOOP SC2 League : Weekly & Monthly INu's Battles#18 - Cure, herO, Rogue & ByuN Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Industrial Park New Map Maker - Looking for Advice - Love or Hate
External Content
Mutation # 535 Assembly of Vengeance The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 534 Burning Evacuation Mutation # 533 Die Together
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Recent recommended BW games screpdb: new Starcraft reporting tool ASL22 General Discussion
Tourneys
Star Con San Diego 2026 BSL LAN Party - Kraków 29-30 August - OPEN SIGNUPS [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament - Season 3
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers PvT advise for noobs Fighting Spirit mining rates Creating a full chart of Zerg builds
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile ZeroSpace Early Access is Now Live! Diablo IV
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread US Politics Mega-thread How to buy a book - shipping from Korea to Europe
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club The HerO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread Series you have seen recently... [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread 2026-27 Football Thread placeholder TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Simple Questions Simple Answers FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop
TL Community
Northern Ireland Global Starcraft The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How Games can Help with Majo…
TrAiDoS
Hello guys!
LIN1s
ASL S22 English Commentary…
namkraft
Poker (part 2)
Nebuchad
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 7800 users

SC2 5.0.15 PTR Patch Notes + Sept 22nd update - Page 3

Forum Index > SC2 General
315 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 14 15 16 Next All
TeamMamba
Profile Joined June 2025
256 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-09-18 21:14:02
September 18 2025 21:13 GMT
#41
Is this a joke?

Storm gets nerf to the ground. Storm was something that toss could rely against bio ball. Now it’s total garbage. If they gonna nerf storm at least buff the col and distributor. Also basically timing attack from Zerg with hydra ling bane will have a 100% win rate

Viper cannot abduct siege tanks? lol clown idea

@wombat. The wombat patch got nerf. What you think ?

CicadaSC
Profile Joined January 2018
United States1972 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-09-18 21:24:36
September 18 2025 21:23 GMT
#42
This is exactly what I have been hoping for, sort of.

Big exciting changes are what we need. Shake up the game because it feels stale right now. NOT balance tweaks. Radical changes. I wanna see pros play this.
Remember that we all come from a place of passion!!
monitor
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2409 Posts
September 18 2025 21:43 GMT
#43
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.
https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/Monitor
Zidane
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
United States1692 Posts
September 18 2025 21:52 GMT
#44
Give templars Siege Tank Range and I'll take the storm nerf
LaughNgamezSOOP
Profile Joined June 2024
68 Posts
September 18 2025 22:46 GMT
#45
Blizzard may as well not patch when we get barely communicated garbage once a year if we're lucky. Patches need to be every 3-6 months or at least have a revisionary patch instead of sticking us with garbage.
Literally the greatest caster ever: https://www.youtube.com/@LaughNgamed
RogueTheGOAT
Profile Joined July 2025
166 Posts
September 18 2025 22:47 GMT
#46
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.
Balnazza
Profile Joined January 2018
Germany1319 Posts
September 18 2025 23:27 GMT
#47
On September 19 2025 07:47 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.


Removing the Mothership Core was somewhat easy. Removing the Queen would literally mean to entirely re-design the Zerg-race.
You might not know this, but Zerg players don't use Queens because they are "lul OP", they use them because there is literally no chance in hell to survive the first 5-7 minutes without them...
"Wenn die Zauberin runter geht, dann macht sie die Beine breit" - Khaldor, trying to cast WC3 German-only
Vindicare605
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States16125 Posts
September 18 2025 23:47 GMT
#48
On September 19 2025 08:27 Balnazza wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 07:47 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.


Removing the Mothership Core was somewhat easy. Removing the Queen would literally mean to entirely re-design the Zerg-race.
You might not know this, but Zerg players don't use Queens because they are "lul OP", they use them because there is literally no chance in hell to survive the first 5-7 minutes without them...


Agreed.

Removing Queens would be as difficult to do as removing Warp Gate would be. You'd need to completely retool the race and totally change around their tech tree in order to make up for all of the things Queens currently do for Zerg.

Is it a good idea to change Zerg so they aren't so dependent on this one catch all of a unit? Absolutely. But it's not as easy as just taking the Mothership Core out. The Mothership core was JUST a defensive bandaid, one that they were able to replace with Shield Batteries. Queens are a defensive bandaid, a very important map control tool, and a production enhancer. Zerg would need replacement mechanics for all of those in order to completely replace the Queen.

Good idea? I think so. But it would be difficult to implement.
aka: KTVindicare the Geeky Bartender
Glorfindelio
Profile Joined October 2022
228 Posts
September 18 2025 23:57 GMT
#49
On September 19 2025 08:47 Vindicare605 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 08:27 Balnazza wrote:
On September 19 2025 07:47 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.


Removing the Mothership Core was somewhat easy. Removing the Queen would literally mean to entirely re-design the Zerg-race.
You might not know this, but Zerg players don't use Queens because they are "lul OP", they use them because there is literally no chance in hell to survive the first 5-7 minutes without them...


Agreed.

Removing Queens would be as difficult to do as removing Warp Gate would be. You'd need to completely retool the race and totally change around their tech tree in order to make up for all of the things Queens currently do for Zerg.

Is it a good idea to change Zerg so they aren't so dependent on this one catch all of a unit? Absolutely. But it's not as easy as just taking the Mothership Core out. The Mothership core was JUST a defensive bandaid, one that they were able to replace with Shield Batteries. Queens are a defensive bandaid, a very important map control tool, and a production enhancer. Zerg would need replacement mechanics for all of those in order to completely replace the Queen.

Good idea? I think so. But it would be difficult to implement.


All good points. Beyond just the balance implications, we'd also be removing maybe the single most foundational mechanical aspect of the entire race--hell, maybe of all three races. Your basic cycle/rhythm from the moment you start Zerg is based around Queen injects and spreading creep and moving them accordingly. Taking them out would be burning a decade of muscle memory away for players.
monitor
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2409 Posts
September 18 2025 23:58 GMT
#50
In favor of queens being removed but yes you’d have to completely rework Z (and of course same with removing warpgate - or making it slower than gateways - would also be a huge rework)!
https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/Monitor
RogueTheGOAT
Profile Joined July 2025
166 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-09-19 00:08:20
September 19 2025 00:06 GMT
#51
On September 19 2025 08:27 Balnazza wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 07:47 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.


Removing the Mothership Core was somewhat easy. Removing the Queen would literally mean to entirely re-design the Zerg-race.
You might not know this, but Zerg players don't use Queens because they are "lul OP", they use them because there is literally no chance in hell to survive the first 5-7 minutes without them...

That literally described Protoss with the Mothership Core. After they removed it, they had to add Shield Batteries, but those weren't enough, so they added the overcharge ability, but then people complained, so that was removed and Energy Recharge was added, but then people complained, so that is being nerfed and storm gutted.

Larva production could be increased and Zerg players could invest further into macro hatcheries like they do in Brood War.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland27230 Posts
September 19 2025 00:08 GMT
#52
Protoss will get absolutely fucking butchered if those storm changes go through, what the fuck is that?

Terrans and Zergs will just run through it and kill you.

Luckily Toss can count on the Colossus to fill the AoE role. Wait, Vikings are also cheaper now?

The whole point of surveillance mode is just to stick observers in place, it always was. If that’s an issue, I’d argue nerf its vision range in that mode slightly, be less F2 friendly. Not the opposite. What’s the point in having observers with a bit more vision range that can be killed by anything that can shoot up?

Siege tanks can’t be abducted I also don’t like. Why siege tanks specifically? From my understanding a lot of non-pro players already struggle playing versus mech, so let’s make it harder?

Why not Collosus and Disruptors? Unless you hit a really sharp timing, Vipers render Robo-centric play borderline useless. Indeed, it’s why Toss players go Airtoss in the first place.

Other stuff, I think there’s some interesting tweaks, and other stuff I’m not sure on, but interested to see how it plays out.

The Templar change will completely make Toss unviable at the top level at least, there’s nothing to compensate properly. Templars now suck, so you have to look at another AoE option. Well, if it’s Colossus Terran can squeeze more Vikings out, and Disruptors are already suffering from their last nerf.

In PvZ if Temps now suck, you will just die. Either you play the current meta, and Zergs will just run through your storms and kill you, or you adapt and go Robo, and Zergs will make a few vipers and laugh at you
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Vindicare605
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States16125 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-09-19 00:12:51
September 19 2025 00:11 GMT
#53
On September 19 2025 09:06 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 08:27 Balnazza wrote:
On September 19 2025 07:47 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.


Removing the Mothership Core was somewhat easy. Removing the Queen would literally mean to entirely re-design the Zerg-race.
You might not know this, but Zerg players don't use Queens because they are "lul OP", they use them because there is literally no chance in hell to survive the first 5-7 minutes without them...

That literally described Protoss with the Mothership Core. After they removed it, they had to add Shield Batteries, but those weren't enough, so they added the overcharge ability, but then people complained, so that was removed and Energy Recharge was added, but then people complained, so that is being nerfed and storm gutted.

Larva production could be increased and Zerg players could invest further into macro hatcheries like they do in Brood War.


Queens also currently provide the only form of anti-air from a unit available before Lair, they are able to heal units and structures and Creep Tumors are currently one of the most powerful tools that any race has.

Even if you think that Creep should be nerfed, these are all simply MUCH bigger facets of the race than just what the Mothership Core used to provide. The fact that Protoss is still a work in progress for replacing that unit should give you an idea of how difficult it would be to remove Queens.

Like I said, the goal is a worthwhile one, but we couldn't even begin to try without serious consideration for everything involved in doing it.
aka: KTVindicare the Geeky Bartender
Vindicare605
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States16125 Posts
September 19 2025 00:13 GMT
#54
On September 19 2025 09:08 WombaT wrote:
Protoss will get absolutely fucking butchered if those storm changes go through, what the fuck is that?

Terrans and Zergs will just run through it and kill you.

Luckily Toss can count on the Colossus to fill the AoE role. Wait, Vikings are also cheaper now?

The whole point of surveillance mode is just to stick observers in place, it always was. If that’s an issue, I’d argue nerf its vision range in that mode slightly, be less F2 friendly. Not the opposite. What’s the point in having observers with a bit more vision range that can be killed by anything that can shoot up?

Siege tanks can’t be abducted I also don’t like. Why siege tanks specifically? From my understanding a lot of non-pro players already struggle playing versus mech, so let’s make it harder?

Why not Collosus and Disruptors? Unless you hit a really sharp timing, Vipers render Robo-centric play borderline useless. Indeed, it’s why Toss players go Airtoss in the first place.

Other stuff, I think there’s some interesting tweaks, and other stuff I’m not sure on, but interested to see how it plays out.

The Templar change will completely make Toss unviable at the top level at least, there’s nothing to compensate properly. Templars now suck, so you have to look at another AoE option. Well, if it’s Colossus Terran can squeeze more Vikings out, and Disruptors are already suffering from their last nerf.

In PvZ if Temps now suck, you will just die. Either you play the current meta, and Zergs will just run through your storms and kill you, or you adapt and go Robo, and Zergs will make a few vipers and laugh at you



Apparently the Storm change specifically we can directly blame on Harstem.

I seriously don't understand what the thought process is on it at all.
aka: KTVindicare the Geeky Bartender
RogueTheGOAT
Profile Joined July 2025
166 Posts
September 19 2025 00:35 GMT
#55
On September 19 2025 09:11 Vindicare605 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 09:06 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 08:27 Balnazza wrote:
On September 19 2025 07:47 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.


Removing the Mothership Core was somewhat easy. Removing the Queen would literally mean to entirely re-design the Zerg-race.
You might not know this, but Zerg players don't use Queens because they are "lul OP", they use them because there is literally no chance in hell to survive the first 5-7 minutes without them...

That literally described Protoss with the Mothership Core. After they removed it, they had to add Shield Batteries, but those weren't enough, so they added the overcharge ability, but then people complained, so that was removed and Energy Recharge was added, but then people complained, so that is being nerfed and storm gutted.

Larva production could be increased and Zerg players could invest further into macro hatcheries like they do in Brood War.


Queens also currently provide the only form of anti-air from a unit available before Lair, they are able to heal units and structures and Creep Tumors are currently one of the most powerful tools that any race has.

Even if you think that Creep should be nerfed, these are all simply MUCH bigger facets of the race than just what the Mothership Core used to provide. The fact that Protoss is still a work in progress for replacing that unit should give you an idea of how difficult it would be to remove Queens.

Like I said, the goal is a worthwhile one, but we couldn't even begin to try without serious consideration for everything involved in doing it.

You do know that Zerg used to have a hatchery tech anti-air unit, right?
Vindicare605
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States16125 Posts
September 19 2025 00:44 GMT
#56
On September 19 2025 09:35 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 09:11 Vindicare605 wrote:
On September 19 2025 09:06 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 08:27 Balnazza wrote:
On September 19 2025 07:47 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.


Removing the Mothership Core was somewhat easy. Removing the Queen would literally mean to entirely re-design the Zerg-race.
You might not know this, but Zerg players don't use Queens because they are "lul OP", they use them because there is literally no chance in hell to survive the first 5-7 minutes without them...

That literally described Protoss with the Mothership Core. After they removed it, they had to add Shield Batteries, but those weren't enough, so they added the overcharge ability, but then people complained, so that was removed and Energy Recharge was added, but then people complained, so that is being nerfed and storm gutted.

Larva production could be increased and Zerg players could invest further into macro hatcheries like they do in Brood War.


Queens also currently provide the only form of anti-air from a unit available before Lair, they are able to heal units and structures and Creep Tumors are currently one of the most powerful tools that any race has.

Even if you think that Creep should be nerfed, these are all simply MUCH bigger facets of the race than just what the Mothership Core used to provide. The fact that Protoss is still a work in progress for replacing that unit should give you an idea of how difficult it would be to remove Queens.

Like I said, the goal is a worthwhile one, but we couldn't even begin to try without serious consideration for everything involved in doing it.

You do know that Zerg used to have a hatchery tech anti-air unit, right?


Oh I'm aware, but say we move Hydralisks to Tier 1. Would they be balanced at Tier 1? I don't think so, especially vs Protoss, Hydralisk busts are already meta in ZvP in Brood War, and if Hydralisks got moved to Hatch Tech I certainly think they would become an issue in the match up.

That's only one issue I can think of happening if we just swap Hydralisks to tier 1 without any other changes.

This also still wouldn't change anything about Queens' other roles.
aka: KTVindicare the Geeky Bartender
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland27230 Posts
September 19 2025 00:45 GMT
#57
On September 19 2025 09:13 Vindicare605 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 09:08 WombaT wrote:
Protoss will get absolutely fucking butchered if those storm changes go through, what the fuck is that?

Terrans and Zergs will just run through it and kill you.

Luckily Toss can count on the Colossus to fill the AoE role. Wait, Vikings are also cheaper now?

The whole point of surveillance mode is just to stick observers in place, it always was. If that’s an issue, I’d argue nerf its vision range in that mode slightly, be less F2 friendly. Not the opposite. What’s the point in having observers with a bit more vision range that can be killed by anything that can shoot up?

Siege tanks can’t be abducted I also don’t like. Why siege tanks specifically? From my understanding a lot of non-pro players already struggle playing versus mech, so let’s make it harder?

Why not Collosus and Disruptors? Unless you hit a really sharp timing, Vipers render Robo-centric play borderline useless. Indeed, it’s why Toss players go Airtoss in the first place.

Other stuff, I think there’s some interesting tweaks, and other stuff I’m not sure on, but interested to see how it plays out.

The Templar change will completely make Toss unviable at the top level at least, there’s nothing to compensate properly. Templars now suck, so you have to look at another AoE option. Well, if it’s Colossus Terran can squeeze more Vikings out, and Disruptors are already suffering from their last nerf.

In PvZ if Temps now suck, you will just die. Either you play the current meta, and Zergs will just run through your storms and kill you, or you adapt and go Robo, and Zergs will make a few vipers and laugh at you



Apparently the Storm change specifically we can directly blame on Harstem.

I seriously don't understand what the thought process is on it at all.

I don’t doubt Harstem had the idea. Of pro players he’s quite reasonable in identifying potential issues with his own race, better than most.

But I would assume Harstem had a minor tweak in mind.

He probably said storm is brutally punishing, especially at lower levels and people maybe should get a little more time to mitigate the damage.

I doubt he advocated for a storm nerf that will basically enable you to just walk through it.
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
BonitiilloO
Profile Joined June 2013
Dominican Republic627 Posts
September 19 2025 00:57 GMT
#58
Queens do not need to be removed, they need to get a cost increase or a supply cost increase, the unit fills so many roles for the price/supply it cost.
How may help u?
TeamMamba
Profile Joined June 2025
256 Posts
September 19 2025 01:09 GMT
#59
On September 19 2025 09:08 WombaT wrote:
Protoss will get absolutely fucking butchered if those storm changes go through, what the fuck is that?

Terrans and Zergs will just run through it and kill you.

Luckily Toss can count on the Colossus to fill the AoE role. Wait, Vikings are also cheaper now?

The whole point of surveillance mode is just to stick observers in place, it always was. If that’s an issue, I’d argue nerf its vision range in that mode slightly, be less F2 friendly. Not the opposite. What’s the point in having observers with a bit more vision range that can be killed by anything that can shoot up?

Siege tanks can’t be abducted I also don’t like. Why siege tanks specifically? From my understanding a lot of non-pro players already struggle playing versus mech, so let’s make it harder?

Why not Collosus and Disruptors? Unless you hit a really sharp timing, Vipers render Robo-centric play borderline useless. Indeed, it’s why Toss players go Airtoss in the first place.

Other stuff, I think there’s some interesting tweaks, and other stuff I’m not sure on, but interested to see how it plays out.

The Templar change will completely make Toss unviable at the top level at least, there’s nothing to compensate properly. Templars now suck, so you have to look at another AoE option. Well, if it’s Colossus Terran can squeeze more Vikings out, and Disruptors are already suffering from their last nerf.

In PvZ if Temps now suck, you will just die. Either you play the current meta, and Zergs will just run through your storms and kill you, or you adapt and go Robo, and Zergs will make a few vipers and laugh at you


Bio ball will literally Stim a move and crush the toss army

Lings and banes literally laugh at it. Now banes will definitely connect no matter what

Basically Terran and Zergs no longer need to bait out storms. They just need to be decisive on the attack and run though it
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland27230 Posts
September 19 2025 01:11 GMT
#60
On September 19 2025 10:09 TeamMamba wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 09:08 WombaT wrote:
Protoss will get absolutely fucking butchered if those storm changes go through, what the fuck is that?

Terrans and Zergs will just run through it and kill you.

Luckily Toss can count on the Colossus to fill the AoE role. Wait, Vikings are also cheaper now?

The whole point of surveillance mode is just to stick observers in place, it always was. If that’s an issue, I’d argue nerf its vision range in that mode slightly, be less F2 friendly. Not the opposite. What’s the point in having observers with a bit more vision range that can be killed by anything that can shoot up?

Siege tanks can’t be abducted I also don’t like. Why siege tanks specifically? From my understanding a lot of non-pro players already struggle playing versus mech, so let’s make it harder?

Why not Collosus and Disruptors? Unless you hit a really sharp timing, Vipers render Robo-centric play borderline useless. Indeed, it’s why Toss players go Airtoss in the first place.

Other stuff, I think there’s some interesting tweaks, and other stuff I’m not sure on, but interested to see how it plays out.

The Templar change will completely make Toss unviable at the top level at least, there’s nothing to compensate properly. Templars now suck, so you have to look at another AoE option. Well, if it’s Colossus Terran can squeeze more Vikings out, and Disruptors are already suffering from their last nerf.

In PvZ if Temps now suck, you will just die. Either you play the current meta, and Zergs will just run through your storms and kill you, or you adapt and go Robo, and Zergs will make a few vipers and laugh at you


Bio ball will literally Stim a move and crush the toss army

Lings and banes literally laugh at it. Now banes will definitely connect no matter what

Basically Terran and Zergs no longer need to bait out storms. They just need to be decisive on the attack and run though it

Yep.

I’m not very good at the game, and even I think I could just engage through the new Storm, what the fuck is a Clem going to do?

I mean I know we’re in the phase of a bunch of ideas, not all will make it into an actual patch. But this, it just can’t make it in, it’s crazy
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 14 15 16 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 38m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
NeuroSwarm 214
RuFF_SC2 196
FoxeR 51
Nina 44
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 1391
Leta 144
yabsab 12
firebathero 0
League of Legends
JimRising 799
Counter-Strike
summit1g9616
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox720
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor150
Other Games
WinterStarcraft645
ROOTCatZ232
Maynarde208
Nathanias51
amsayoshi19
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1112
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH269
• davetesta18
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 5
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota284
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
3h 38m
Clem vs ByuN
Rogue vs Lambo
OSC
6h 38m
Online Event
9h 38m
WardiTV Weekly
1d 5h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
INu's Battles
2 days
Cure vs herO
ByuN vs Rogue
PiGosaur Cup
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Kung Fu Cup
3 days
Patches Events
3 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
4 days
CrankTV Team League
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
CrankTV Team League
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
WardiTV Summer Champion…
6 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL S22 SEASON OPEN Day 2
HSC XXIX
Eternal Conflict S2 E3

Ongoing

CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
SCTL 2026 Spring
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: W5
ASL Season 22: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 22: Qualifier #2
Acropolis #5
CSLAN 4
ASL Season 22
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Light Tournament 2026
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
Logitech G Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.