• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 06:29
CEST 12:29
KST 19:29
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver4[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down1StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon98Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism10Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon?179Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)9
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down How do you feel about the StarCraft shooter announcement at BlizzCon 2026? Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16)
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 SC2 AI Tournament 2026 Fall Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament KSL Week #92
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 542 The Ascended Mutation # 541 Binary Choice
Brood War
General
Remastered crash fix suggestions ASL22 General Discussion Why Protoss Struggles on ASL (Ft. Shuttle, Tulbo) BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon?
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro16 Group D [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Ro16 Group C [ASL22] Ro16 Group B
Strategy
Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread EVE Corporation Diablo IV
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Post Your Watch! Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
Virtual Romance, Real-Life C…
TrAiDoS
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
LOCKPICKING NOOB
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 6944 users

SC2 5.0.15 PTR Patch Notes + Sept 22nd update - Page 3

Forum Index > SC2 General
315 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 14 15 16 Next All
TeamMamba
Profile Joined June 2025
284 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-09-18 21:14:02
September 18 2025 21:13 GMT
#41
Is this a joke?

Storm gets nerf to the ground. Storm was something that toss could rely against bio ball. Now it’s total garbage. If they gonna nerf storm at least buff the col and distributor. Also basically timing attack from Zerg with hydra ling bane will have a 100% win rate

Viper cannot abduct siege tanks? lol clown idea

@wombat. The wombat patch got nerf. What you think ?

CicadaSC
Profile Joined January 2018
United States1986 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-09-18 21:24:36
September 18 2025 21:23 GMT
#42
This is exactly what I have been hoping for, sort of.

Big exciting changes are what we need. Shake up the game because it feels stale right now. NOT balance tweaks. Radical changes. I wanna see pros play this.
Remember that we all come from a place of passion!!
monitor
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2409 Posts
September 18 2025 21:43 GMT
#43
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.
https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/Monitor
Zidane
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
United States1692 Posts
September 18 2025 21:52 GMT
#44
Give templars Siege Tank Range and I'll take the storm nerf
LaughNgamezSOOP
Profile Joined June 2024
68 Posts
September 18 2025 22:46 GMT
#45
Blizzard may as well not patch when we get barely communicated garbage once a year if we're lucky. Patches need to be every 3-6 months or at least have a revisionary patch instead of sticking us with garbage.
Literally the greatest caster ever: https://www.youtube.com/@LaughNgamed
RogueTheGOAT
Profile Joined July 2025
166 Posts
September 18 2025 22:47 GMT
#46
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.
Balnazza
Profile Joined January 2018
Germany1359 Posts
September 18 2025 23:27 GMT
#47
On September 19 2025 07:47 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.


Removing the Mothership Core was somewhat easy. Removing the Queen would literally mean to entirely re-design the Zerg-race.
You might not know this, but Zerg players don't use Queens because they are "lul OP", they use them because there is literally no chance in hell to survive the first 5-7 minutes without them...
"Wenn die Zauberin runter geht, dann macht sie die Beine breit" - Khaldor, trying to cast WC3 German-only
Vindicare605
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States16125 Posts
September 18 2025 23:47 GMT
#48
On September 19 2025 08:27 Balnazza wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 07:47 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.


Removing the Mothership Core was somewhat easy. Removing the Queen would literally mean to entirely re-design the Zerg-race.
You might not know this, but Zerg players don't use Queens because they are "lul OP", they use them because there is literally no chance in hell to survive the first 5-7 minutes without them...


Agreed.

Removing Queens would be as difficult to do as removing Warp Gate would be. You'd need to completely retool the race and totally change around their tech tree in order to make up for all of the things Queens currently do for Zerg.

Is it a good idea to change Zerg so they aren't so dependent on this one catch all of a unit? Absolutely. But it's not as easy as just taking the Mothership Core out. The Mothership core was JUST a defensive bandaid, one that they were able to replace with Shield Batteries. Queens are a defensive bandaid, a very important map control tool, and a production enhancer. Zerg would need replacement mechanics for all of those in order to completely replace the Queen.

Good idea? I think so. But it would be difficult to implement.
aka: KTVindicare the Geeky Bartender
Glorfindelio
Profile Joined October 2022
231 Posts
September 18 2025 23:57 GMT
#49
On September 19 2025 08:47 Vindicare605 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 08:27 Balnazza wrote:
On September 19 2025 07:47 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.


Removing the Mothership Core was somewhat easy. Removing the Queen would literally mean to entirely re-design the Zerg-race.
You might not know this, but Zerg players don't use Queens because they are "lul OP", they use them because there is literally no chance in hell to survive the first 5-7 minutes without them...


Agreed.

Removing Queens would be as difficult to do as removing Warp Gate would be. You'd need to completely retool the race and totally change around their tech tree in order to make up for all of the things Queens currently do for Zerg.

Is it a good idea to change Zerg so they aren't so dependent on this one catch all of a unit? Absolutely. But it's not as easy as just taking the Mothership Core out. The Mothership core was JUST a defensive bandaid, one that they were able to replace with Shield Batteries. Queens are a defensive bandaid, a very important map control tool, and a production enhancer. Zerg would need replacement mechanics for all of those in order to completely replace the Queen.

Good idea? I think so. But it would be difficult to implement.


All good points. Beyond just the balance implications, we'd also be removing maybe the single most foundational mechanical aspect of the entire race--hell, maybe of all three races. Your basic cycle/rhythm from the moment you start Zerg is based around Queen injects and spreading creep and moving them accordingly. Taking them out would be burning a decade of muscle memory away for players.
monitor
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2409 Posts
September 18 2025 23:58 GMT
#50
In favor of queens being removed but yes you’d have to completely rework Z (and of course same with removing warpgate - or making it slower than gateways - would also be a huge rework)!
https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/Monitor
RogueTheGOAT
Profile Joined July 2025
166 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-09-19 00:08:20
September 19 2025 00:06 GMT
#51
On September 19 2025 08:27 Balnazza wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 07:47 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.


Removing the Mothership Core was somewhat easy. Removing the Queen would literally mean to entirely re-design the Zerg-race.
You might not know this, but Zerg players don't use Queens because they are "lul OP", they use them because there is literally no chance in hell to survive the first 5-7 minutes without them...

That literally described Protoss with the Mothership Core. After they removed it, they had to add Shield Batteries, but those weren't enough, so they added the overcharge ability, but then people complained, so that was removed and Energy Recharge was added, but then people complained, so that is being nerfed and storm gutted.

Larva production could be increased and Zerg players could invest further into macro hatcheries like they do in Brood War.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland27353 Posts
September 19 2025 00:08 GMT
#52
Protoss will get absolutely fucking butchered if those storm changes go through, what the fuck is that?

Terrans and Zergs will just run through it and kill you.

Luckily Toss can count on the Colossus to fill the AoE role. Wait, Vikings are also cheaper now?

The whole point of surveillance mode is just to stick observers in place, it always was. If that’s an issue, I’d argue nerf its vision range in that mode slightly, be less F2 friendly. Not the opposite. What’s the point in having observers with a bit more vision range that can be killed by anything that can shoot up?

Siege tanks can’t be abducted I also don’t like. Why siege tanks specifically? From my understanding a lot of non-pro players already struggle playing versus mech, so let’s make it harder?

Why not Collosus and Disruptors? Unless you hit a really sharp timing, Vipers render Robo-centric play borderline useless. Indeed, it’s why Toss players go Airtoss in the first place.

Other stuff, I think there’s some interesting tweaks, and other stuff I’m not sure on, but interested to see how it plays out.

The Templar change will completely make Toss unviable at the top level at least, there’s nothing to compensate properly. Templars now suck, so you have to look at another AoE option. Well, if it’s Colossus Terran can squeeze more Vikings out, and Disruptors are already suffering from their last nerf.

In PvZ if Temps now suck, you will just die. Either you play the current meta, and Zergs will just run through your storms and kill you, or you adapt and go Robo, and Zergs will make a few vipers and laugh at you
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Vindicare605
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States16125 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-09-19 00:12:51
September 19 2025 00:11 GMT
#53
On September 19 2025 09:06 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 08:27 Balnazza wrote:
On September 19 2025 07:47 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.


Removing the Mothership Core was somewhat easy. Removing the Queen would literally mean to entirely re-design the Zerg-race.
You might not know this, but Zerg players don't use Queens because they are "lul OP", they use them because there is literally no chance in hell to survive the first 5-7 minutes without them...

That literally described Protoss with the Mothership Core. After they removed it, they had to add Shield Batteries, but those weren't enough, so they added the overcharge ability, but then people complained, so that was removed and Energy Recharge was added, but then people complained, so that is being nerfed and storm gutted.

Larva production could be increased and Zerg players could invest further into macro hatcheries like they do in Brood War.


Queens also currently provide the only form of anti-air from a unit available before Lair, they are able to heal units and structures and Creep Tumors are currently one of the most powerful tools that any race has.

Even if you think that Creep should be nerfed, these are all simply MUCH bigger facets of the race than just what the Mothership Core used to provide. The fact that Protoss is still a work in progress for replacing that unit should give you an idea of how difficult it would be to remove Queens.

Like I said, the goal is a worthwhile one, but we couldn't even begin to try without serious consideration for everything involved in doing it.
aka: KTVindicare the Geeky Bartender
Vindicare605
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States16125 Posts
September 19 2025 00:13 GMT
#54
On September 19 2025 09:08 WombaT wrote:
Protoss will get absolutely fucking butchered if those storm changes go through, what the fuck is that?

Terrans and Zergs will just run through it and kill you.

Luckily Toss can count on the Colossus to fill the AoE role. Wait, Vikings are also cheaper now?

The whole point of surveillance mode is just to stick observers in place, it always was. If that’s an issue, I’d argue nerf its vision range in that mode slightly, be less F2 friendly. Not the opposite. What’s the point in having observers with a bit more vision range that can be killed by anything that can shoot up?

Siege tanks can’t be abducted I also don’t like. Why siege tanks specifically? From my understanding a lot of non-pro players already struggle playing versus mech, so let’s make it harder?

Why not Collosus and Disruptors? Unless you hit a really sharp timing, Vipers render Robo-centric play borderline useless. Indeed, it’s why Toss players go Airtoss in the first place.

Other stuff, I think there’s some interesting tweaks, and other stuff I’m not sure on, but interested to see how it plays out.

The Templar change will completely make Toss unviable at the top level at least, there’s nothing to compensate properly. Templars now suck, so you have to look at another AoE option. Well, if it’s Colossus Terran can squeeze more Vikings out, and Disruptors are already suffering from their last nerf.

In PvZ if Temps now suck, you will just die. Either you play the current meta, and Zergs will just run through your storms and kill you, or you adapt and go Robo, and Zergs will make a few vipers and laugh at you



Apparently the Storm change specifically we can directly blame on Harstem.

I seriously don't understand what the thought process is on it at all.
aka: KTVindicare the Geeky Bartender
RogueTheGOAT
Profile Joined July 2025
166 Posts
September 19 2025 00:35 GMT
#55
On September 19 2025 09:11 Vindicare605 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 09:06 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 08:27 Balnazza wrote:
On September 19 2025 07:47 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.


Removing the Mothership Core was somewhat easy. Removing the Queen would literally mean to entirely re-design the Zerg-race.
You might not know this, but Zerg players don't use Queens because they are "lul OP", they use them because there is literally no chance in hell to survive the first 5-7 minutes without them...

That literally described Protoss with the Mothership Core. After they removed it, they had to add Shield Batteries, but those weren't enough, so they added the overcharge ability, but then people complained, so that was removed and Energy Recharge was added, but then people complained, so that is being nerfed and storm gutted.

Larva production could be increased and Zerg players could invest further into macro hatcheries like they do in Brood War.


Queens also currently provide the only form of anti-air from a unit available before Lair, they are able to heal units and structures and Creep Tumors are currently one of the most powerful tools that any race has.

Even if you think that Creep should be nerfed, these are all simply MUCH bigger facets of the race than just what the Mothership Core used to provide. The fact that Protoss is still a work in progress for replacing that unit should give you an idea of how difficult it would be to remove Queens.

Like I said, the goal is a worthwhile one, but we couldn't even begin to try without serious consideration for everything involved in doing it.

You do know that Zerg used to have a hatchery tech anti-air unit, right?
Vindicare605
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States16125 Posts
September 19 2025 00:44 GMT
#56
On September 19 2025 09:35 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 09:11 Vindicare605 wrote:
On September 19 2025 09:06 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 08:27 Balnazza wrote:
On September 19 2025 07:47 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.


Removing the Mothership Core was somewhat easy. Removing the Queen would literally mean to entirely re-design the Zerg-race.
You might not know this, but Zerg players don't use Queens because they are "lul OP", they use them because there is literally no chance in hell to survive the first 5-7 minutes without them...

That literally described Protoss with the Mothership Core. After they removed it, they had to add Shield Batteries, but those weren't enough, so they added the overcharge ability, but then people complained, so that was removed and Energy Recharge was added, but then people complained, so that is being nerfed and storm gutted.

Larva production could be increased and Zerg players could invest further into macro hatcheries like they do in Brood War.


Queens also currently provide the only form of anti-air from a unit available before Lair, they are able to heal units and structures and Creep Tumors are currently one of the most powerful tools that any race has.

Even if you think that Creep should be nerfed, these are all simply MUCH bigger facets of the race than just what the Mothership Core used to provide. The fact that Protoss is still a work in progress for replacing that unit should give you an idea of how difficult it would be to remove Queens.

Like I said, the goal is a worthwhile one, but we couldn't even begin to try without serious consideration for everything involved in doing it.

You do know that Zerg used to have a hatchery tech anti-air unit, right?


Oh I'm aware, but say we move Hydralisks to Tier 1. Would they be balanced at Tier 1? I don't think so, especially vs Protoss, Hydralisk busts are already meta in ZvP in Brood War, and if Hydralisks got moved to Hatch Tech I certainly think they would become an issue in the match up.

That's only one issue I can think of happening if we just swap Hydralisks to tier 1 without any other changes.

This also still wouldn't change anything about Queens' other roles.
aka: KTVindicare the Geeky Bartender
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland27353 Posts
September 19 2025 00:45 GMT
#57
On September 19 2025 09:13 Vindicare605 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 09:08 WombaT wrote:
Protoss will get absolutely fucking butchered if those storm changes go through, what the fuck is that?

Terrans and Zergs will just run through it and kill you.

Luckily Toss can count on the Colossus to fill the AoE role. Wait, Vikings are also cheaper now?

The whole point of surveillance mode is just to stick observers in place, it always was. If that’s an issue, I’d argue nerf its vision range in that mode slightly, be less F2 friendly. Not the opposite. What’s the point in having observers with a bit more vision range that can be killed by anything that can shoot up?

Siege tanks can’t be abducted I also don’t like. Why siege tanks specifically? From my understanding a lot of non-pro players already struggle playing versus mech, so let’s make it harder?

Why not Collosus and Disruptors? Unless you hit a really sharp timing, Vipers render Robo-centric play borderline useless. Indeed, it’s why Toss players go Airtoss in the first place.

Other stuff, I think there’s some interesting tweaks, and other stuff I’m not sure on, but interested to see how it plays out.

The Templar change will completely make Toss unviable at the top level at least, there’s nothing to compensate properly. Templars now suck, so you have to look at another AoE option. Well, if it’s Colossus Terran can squeeze more Vikings out, and Disruptors are already suffering from their last nerf.

In PvZ if Temps now suck, you will just die. Either you play the current meta, and Zergs will just run through your storms and kill you, or you adapt and go Robo, and Zergs will make a few vipers and laugh at you



Apparently the Storm change specifically we can directly blame on Harstem.

I seriously don't understand what the thought process is on it at all.

I don’t doubt Harstem had the idea. Of pro players he’s quite reasonable in identifying potential issues with his own race, better than most.

But I would assume Harstem had a minor tweak in mind.

He probably said storm is brutally punishing, especially at lower levels and people maybe should get a little more time to mitigate the damage.

I doubt he advocated for a storm nerf that will basically enable you to just walk through it.
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
BonitiilloO
Profile Joined June 2013
Dominican Republic627 Posts
September 19 2025 00:57 GMT
#58
Queens do not need to be removed, they need to get a cost increase or a supply cost increase, the unit fills so many roles for the price/supply it cost.
How may help u?
TeamMamba
Profile Joined June 2025
284 Posts
September 19 2025 01:09 GMT
#59
On September 19 2025 09:08 WombaT wrote:
Protoss will get absolutely fucking butchered if those storm changes go through, what the fuck is that?

Terrans and Zergs will just run through it and kill you.

Luckily Toss can count on the Colossus to fill the AoE role. Wait, Vikings are also cheaper now?

The whole point of surveillance mode is just to stick observers in place, it always was. If that’s an issue, I’d argue nerf its vision range in that mode slightly, be less F2 friendly. Not the opposite. What’s the point in having observers with a bit more vision range that can be killed by anything that can shoot up?

Siege tanks can’t be abducted I also don’t like. Why siege tanks specifically? From my understanding a lot of non-pro players already struggle playing versus mech, so let’s make it harder?

Why not Collosus and Disruptors? Unless you hit a really sharp timing, Vipers render Robo-centric play borderline useless. Indeed, it’s why Toss players go Airtoss in the first place.

Other stuff, I think there’s some interesting tweaks, and other stuff I’m not sure on, but interested to see how it plays out.

The Templar change will completely make Toss unviable at the top level at least, there’s nothing to compensate properly. Templars now suck, so you have to look at another AoE option. Well, if it’s Colossus Terran can squeeze more Vikings out, and Disruptors are already suffering from their last nerf.

In PvZ if Temps now suck, you will just die. Either you play the current meta, and Zergs will just run through your storms and kill you, or you adapt and go Robo, and Zergs will make a few vipers and laugh at you


Bio ball will literally Stim a move and crush the toss army

Lings and banes literally laugh at it. Now banes will definitely connect no matter what

Basically Terran and Zergs no longer need to bait out storms. They just need to be decisive on the attack and run though it
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland27353 Posts
September 19 2025 01:11 GMT
#60
On September 19 2025 10:09 TeamMamba wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 09:08 WombaT wrote:
Protoss will get absolutely fucking butchered if those storm changes go through, what the fuck is that?

Terrans and Zergs will just run through it and kill you.

Luckily Toss can count on the Colossus to fill the AoE role. Wait, Vikings are also cheaper now?

The whole point of surveillance mode is just to stick observers in place, it always was. If that’s an issue, I’d argue nerf its vision range in that mode slightly, be less F2 friendly. Not the opposite. What’s the point in having observers with a bit more vision range that can be killed by anything that can shoot up?

Siege tanks can’t be abducted I also don’t like. Why siege tanks specifically? From my understanding a lot of non-pro players already struggle playing versus mech, so let’s make it harder?

Why not Collosus and Disruptors? Unless you hit a really sharp timing, Vipers render Robo-centric play borderline useless. Indeed, it’s why Toss players go Airtoss in the first place.

Other stuff, I think there’s some interesting tweaks, and other stuff I’m not sure on, but interested to see how it plays out.

The Templar change will completely make Toss unviable at the top level at least, there’s nothing to compensate properly. Templars now suck, so you have to look at another AoE option. Well, if it’s Colossus Terran can squeeze more Vikings out, and Disruptors are already suffering from their last nerf.

In PvZ if Temps now suck, you will just die. Either you play the current meta, and Zergs will just run through your storms and kill you, or you adapt and go Robo, and Zergs will make a few vipers and laugh at you


Bio ball will literally Stim a move and crush the toss army

Lings and banes literally laugh at it. Now banes will definitely connect no matter what

Basically Terran and Zergs no longer need to bait out storms. They just need to be decisive on the attack and run though it

Yep.

I’m not very good at the game, and even I think I could just engage through the new Storm, what the fuck is a Clem going to do?

I mean I know we’re in the phase of a bunch of ideas, not all will make it into an actual patch. But this, it just can’t make it in, it’s crazy
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 14 15 16 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
The PondCast
10:00
Episode 109
CranKy Ducklings26
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech113
Lowko11
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 1546
Shuttle 1304
firebathero 777
actioN 734
Horang2 481
EffOrt 361
Soulkey 269
Mini 254
Soma 241
Snow 166
[ Show more ]
ZerO 99
Light 98
Rush 92
Stork 89
Shine 73
Killer 70
Larva 64
Pusan 62
Last 56
Hm[arnc] 48
hero 40
910 40
Barracks 39
sSak 22
soO 21
Sharp 19
Terrorterran 3
Britney 0
Dota 2
ODPixel231
League of Legends
Reynor71
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1184
kennyS738
edward42
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King84
Other Games
singsing1578
byalli599
JimRising 358
XaKoH 199
Sick175
ZerO(Twitch)11
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 819
Other Games
gamesdonequick737
BasetradeTV39
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 69
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP10
• Letter148
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 11
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos2788
Other Games
• WagamamaTV35
Upcoming Events
Kung Fu Cup
31m
Replay Cast
13h 31m
KCM Race Survival
23h 31m
IntoTheTV X SOOP
1d
Cure vs SHIN
herO vs Solar
Percival vs Classic
ByuN vs Rogue
OSC
1d 11h
Replay Cast
1d 13h
IntoTheTV X SOOP
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
GSL
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
GSL
4 days
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
4 days
Spirit vs Mixu
Replay Cast
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Shine vs Rush
WardiTV Weekly
5 days
Monday Night Weeklies
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Light vs EffOrt
PiGosaur Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #5 - TRS
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Calamity Invitational
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSA
Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
SC4ALL II: Brood War
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Copium Cup
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.