• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 02:30
CET 08:30
KST 16:30
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT25Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book16Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview13Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info8
Community News
Weekly Cups (Feb 9-15): herO doubles up2ACS replaced by "ASL Season Open" - Starts 21/0241LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals (Feb 10-16)46Weekly Cups (Feb 2-8): Classic, Solar, MaxPax win2Nexon's StarCraft game could be FPS, led by UMS maker16
StarCraft 2
General
ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT Liquipedia WCS Portal Launched Kaelaris on the futue of SC2 and much more... How do you think the 5.0.15 balance patch (Oct 2025) for StarCraft II has affected the game? Nexon's StarCraft game could be FPS, led by UMS maker
Tourneys
PIG STY FESTIVAL 7.0! (19 Feb - 1 Mar) StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) How do the "codes" work in GSL? Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals (Feb 10-16)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ? [A] Starcraft Sound Mod
External Content
Mutation # 513 Attrition Warfare The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 512 Overclocked Mutation # 511 Temple of Rebirth
Brood War
General
Do you consider PvZ imbalanced? Recent recommended BW games BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion CasterMuse Youtube
Tourneys
Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 1 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Zealot bombing is no longer popular? Fighting Spirit mining rates Current Meta
Other Games
General Games
Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Diablo 2 thread Nintendo Switch Thread ZeroSpace Megathread Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Ask and answer stupid questions here! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TL MMA Pick'em Pool 2013
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Inside the Communication of …
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1942 users

SC2 5.0.15 PTR Patch Notes + Sept 22nd update - Page 3

Forum Index > SC2 General
315 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 14 15 16 Next All
TeamMamba
Profile Joined June 2025
192 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-09-18 21:14:02
September 18 2025 21:13 GMT
#41
Is this a joke?

Storm gets nerf to the ground. Storm was something that toss could rely against bio ball. Now it’s total garbage. If they gonna nerf storm at least buff the col and distributor. Also basically timing attack from Zerg with hydra ling bane will have a 100% win rate

Viper cannot abduct siege tanks? lol clown idea

@wombat. The wombat patch got nerf. What you think ?

CicadaSC
Profile Joined January 2018
United States1865 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-09-18 21:24:36
September 18 2025 21:23 GMT
#42
This is exactly what I have been hoping for, sort of.

Big exciting changes are what we need. Shake up the game because it feels stale right now. NOT balance tweaks. Radical changes. I wanna see pros play this.
Remember that we all come from a place of passion!!
monitor
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2408 Posts
September 18 2025 21:43 GMT
#43
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.
https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/Monitor
Zidane
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
United States1689 Posts
September 18 2025 21:52 GMT
#44
Give templars Siege Tank Range and I'll take the storm nerf
LaughNgamezSOOP
Profile Joined June 2024
68 Posts
September 18 2025 22:46 GMT
#45
Blizzard may as well not patch when we get barely communicated garbage once a year if we're lucky. Patches need to be every 3-6 months or at least have a revisionary patch instead of sticking us with garbage.
Literally the greatest caster ever: https://www.youtube.com/@LaughNgamed
RogueTheGOAT
Profile Joined July 2025
166 Posts
September 18 2025 22:47 GMT
#46
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.
Balnazza
Profile Joined January 2018
Germany1262 Posts
September 18 2025 23:27 GMT
#47
On September 19 2025 07:47 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.


Removing the Mothership Core was somewhat easy. Removing the Queen would literally mean to entirely re-design the Zerg-race.
You might not know this, but Zerg players don't use Queens because they are "lul OP", they use them because there is literally no chance in hell to survive the first 5-7 minutes without them...
"Wenn die Zauberin runter geht, dann macht sie die Beine breit" - Khaldor, trying to cast WC3 German-only
Vindicare605
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States16121 Posts
September 18 2025 23:47 GMT
#48
On September 19 2025 08:27 Balnazza wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 07:47 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.


Removing the Mothership Core was somewhat easy. Removing the Queen would literally mean to entirely re-design the Zerg-race.
You might not know this, but Zerg players don't use Queens because they are "lul OP", they use them because there is literally no chance in hell to survive the first 5-7 minutes without them...


Agreed.

Removing Queens would be as difficult to do as removing Warp Gate would be. You'd need to completely retool the race and totally change around their tech tree in order to make up for all of the things Queens currently do for Zerg.

Is it a good idea to change Zerg so they aren't so dependent on this one catch all of a unit? Absolutely. But it's not as easy as just taking the Mothership Core out. The Mothership core was JUST a defensive bandaid, one that they were able to replace with Shield Batteries. Queens are a defensive bandaid, a very important map control tool, and a production enhancer. Zerg would need replacement mechanics for all of those in order to completely replace the Queen.

Good idea? I think so. But it would be difficult to implement.
aka: KTVindicare the Geeky Bartender
Glorfindelio
Profile Joined October 2022
221 Posts
September 18 2025 23:57 GMT
#49
On September 19 2025 08:47 Vindicare605 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 08:27 Balnazza wrote:
On September 19 2025 07:47 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.


Removing the Mothership Core was somewhat easy. Removing the Queen would literally mean to entirely re-design the Zerg-race.
You might not know this, but Zerg players don't use Queens because they are "lul OP", they use them because there is literally no chance in hell to survive the first 5-7 minutes without them...


Agreed.

Removing Queens would be as difficult to do as removing Warp Gate would be. You'd need to completely retool the race and totally change around their tech tree in order to make up for all of the things Queens currently do for Zerg.

Is it a good idea to change Zerg so they aren't so dependent on this one catch all of a unit? Absolutely. But it's not as easy as just taking the Mothership Core out. The Mothership core was JUST a defensive bandaid, one that they were able to replace with Shield Batteries. Queens are a defensive bandaid, a very important map control tool, and a production enhancer. Zerg would need replacement mechanics for all of those in order to completely replace the Queen.

Good idea? I think so. But it would be difficult to implement.


All good points. Beyond just the balance implications, we'd also be removing maybe the single most foundational mechanical aspect of the entire race--hell, maybe of all three races. Your basic cycle/rhythm from the moment you start Zerg is based around Queen injects and spreading creep and moving them accordingly. Taking them out would be burning a decade of muscle memory away for players.
monitor
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2408 Posts
September 18 2025 23:58 GMT
#50
In favor of queens being removed but yes you’d have to completely rework Z (and of course same with removing warpgate - or making it slower than gateways - would also be a huge rework)!
https://liquipedia.net/starcraft2/Monitor
RogueTheGOAT
Profile Joined July 2025
166 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-09-19 00:08:20
September 19 2025 00:06 GMT
#51
On September 19 2025 08:27 Balnazza wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 07:47 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.


Removing the Mothership Core was somewhat easy. Removing the Queen would literally mean to entirely re-design the Zerg-race.
You might not know this, but Zerg players don't use Queens because they are "lul OP", they use them because there is literally no chance in hell to survive the first 5-7 minutes without them...

That literally described Protoss with the Mothership Core. After they removed it, they had to add Shield Batteries, but those weren't enough, so they added the overcharge ability, but then people complained, so that was removed and Energy Recharge was added, but then people complained, so that is being nerfed and storm gutted.

Larva production could be increased and Zerg players could invest further into macro hatcheries like they do in Brood War.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland26265 Posts
September 19 2025 00:08 GMT
#52
Protoss will get absolutely fucking butchered if those storm changes go through, what the fuck is that?

Terrans and Zergs will just run through it and kill you.

Luckily Toss can count on the Colossus to fill the AoE role. Wait, Vikings are also cheaper now?

The whole point of surveillance mode is just to stick observers in place, it always was. If that’s an issue, I’d argue nerf its vision range in that mode slightly, be less F2 friendly. Not the opposite. What’s the point in having observers with a bit more vision range that can be killed by anything that can shoot up?

Siege tanks can’t be abducted I also don’t like. Why siege tanks specifically? From my understanding a lot of non-pro players already struggle playing versus mech, so let’s make it harder?

Why not Collosus and Disruptors? Unless you hit a really sharp timing, Vipers render Robo-centric play borderline useless. Indeed, it’s why Toss players go Airtoss in the first place.

Other stuff, I think there’s some interesting tweaks, and other stuff I’m not sure on, but interested to see how it plays out.

The Templar change will completely make Toss unviable at the top level at least, there’s nothing to compensate properly. Templars now suck, so you have to look at another AoE option. Well, if it’s Colossus Terran can squeeze more Vikings out, and Disruptors are already suffering from their last nerf.

In PvZ if Temps now suck, you will just die. Either you play the current meta, and Zergs will just run through your storms and kill you, or you adapt and go Robo, and Zergs will make a few vipers and laugh at you
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Vindicare605
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States16121 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-09-19 00:12:51
September 19 2025 00:11 GMT
#53
On September 19 2025 09:06 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 08:27 Balnazza wrote:
On September 19 2025 07:47 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.


Removing the Mothership Core was somewhat easy. Removing the Queen would literally mean to entirely re-design the Zerg-race.
You might not know this, but Zerg players don't use Queens because they are "lul OP", they use them because there is literally no chance in hell to survive the first 5-7 minutes without them...

That literally described Protoss with the Mothership Core. After they removed it, they had to add Shield Batteries, but those weren't enough, so they added the overcharge ability, but then people complained, so that was removed and Energy Recharge was added, but then people complained, so that is being nerfed and storm gutted.

Larva production could be increased and Zerg players could invest further into macro hatcheries like they do in Brood War.


Queens also currently provide the only form of anti-air from a unit available before Lair, they are able to heal units and structures and Creep Tumors are currently one of the most powerful tools that any race has.

Even if you think that Creep should be nerfed, these are all simply MUCH bigger facets of the race than just what the Mothership Core used to provide. The fact that Protoss is still a work in progress for replacing that unit should give you an idea of how difficult it would be to remove Queens.

Like I said, the goal is a worthwhile one, but we couldn't even begin to try without serious consideration for everything involved in doing it.
aka: KTVindicare the Geeky Bartender
Vindicare605
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States16121 Posts
September 19 2025 00:13 GMT
#54
On September 19 2025 09:08 WombaT wrote:
Protoss will get absolutely fucking butchered if those storm changes go through, what the fuck is that?

Terrans and Zergs will just run through it and kill you.

Luckily Toss can count on the Colossus to fill the AoE role. Wait, Vikings are also cheaper now?

The whole point of surveillance mode is just to stick observers in place, it always was. If that’s an issue, I’d argue nerf its vision range in that mode slightly, be less F2 friendly. Not the opposite. What’s the point in having observers with a bit more vision range that can be killed by anything that can shoot up?

Siege tanks can’t be abducted I also don’t like. Why siege tanks specifically? From my understanding a lot of non-pro players already struggle playing versus mech, so let’s make it harder?

Why not Collosus and Disruptors? Unless you hit a really sharp timing, Vipers render Robo-centric play borderline useless. Indeed, it’s why Toss players go Airtoss in the first place.

Other stuff, I think there’s some interesting tweaks, and other stuff I’m not sure on, but interested to see how it plays out.

The Templar change will completely make Toss unviable at the top level at least, there’s nothing to compensate properly. Templars now suck, so you have to look at another AoE option. Well, if it’s Colossus Terran can squeeze more Vikings out, and Disruptors are already suffering from their last nerf.

In PvZ if Temps now suck, you will just die. Either you play the current meta, and Zergs will just run through your storms and kill you, or you adapt and go Robo, and Zergs will make a few vipers and laugh at you



Apparently the Storm change specifically we can directly blame on Harstem.

I seriously don't understand what the thought process is on it at all.
aka: KTVindicare the Geeky Bartender
RogueTheGOAT
Profile Joined July 2025
166 Posts
September 19 2025 00:35 GMT
#55
On September 19 2025 09:11 Vindicare605 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 09:06 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 08:27 Balnazza wrote:
On September 19 2025 07:47 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.


Removing the Mothership Core was somewhat easy. Removing the Queen would literally mean to entirely re-design the Zerg-race.
You might not know this, but Zerg players don't use Queens because they are "lul OP", they use them because there is literally no chance in hell to survive the first 5-7 minutes without them...

That literally described Protoss with the Mothership Core. After they removed it, they had to add Shield Batteries, but those weren't enough, so they added the overcharge ability, but then people complained, so that was removed and Energy Recharge was added, but then people complained, so that is being nerfed and storm gutted.

Larva production could be increased and Zerg players could invest further into macro hatcheries like they do in Brood War.


Queens also currently provide the only form of anti-air from a unit available before Lair, they are able to heal units and structures and Creep Tumors are currently one of the most powerful tools that any race has.

Even if you think that Creep should be nerfed, these are all simply MUCH bigger facets of the race than just what the Mothership Core used to provide. The fact that Protoss is still a work in progress for replacing that unit should give you an idea of how difficult it would be to remove Queens.

Like I said, the goal is a worthwhile one, but we couldn't even begin to try without serious consideration for everything involved in doing it.

You do know that Zerg used to have a hatchery tech anti-air unit, right?
Vindicare605
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States16121 Posts
September 19 2025 00:44 GMT
#56
On September 19 2025 09:35 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 09:11 Vindicare605 wrote:
On September 19 2025 09:06 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 08:27 Balnazza wrote:
On September 19 2025 07:47 RogueTheGOAT wrote:
On September 19 2025 06:43 monitor wrote:
There’s balance and there’s game design. Two distinct aspects of the patch.

I like increasing the zoning tools of each race. I don’t like the balance implications.

Game design wise, any attempt to improve SC2 that does not include adding highground advantage and removing warp gates is misguided.

Any game design change that does not delete queens is misguided. The unit violates both basic RTS principles and the fundamental Zerg design principle. It should have been removed in the same patch that removed the Mothership Core.


Removing the Mothership Core was somewhat easy. Removing the Queen would literally mean to entirely re-design the Zerg-race.
You might not know this, but Zerg players don't use Queens because they are "lul OP", they use them because there is literally no chance in hell to survive the first 5-7 minutes without them...

That literally described Protoss with the Mothership Core. After they removed it, they had to add Shield Batteries, but those weren't enough, so they added the overcharge ability, but then people complained, so that was removed and Energy Recharge was added, but then people complained, so that is being nerfed and storm gutted.

Larva production could be increased and Zerg players could invest further into macro hatcheries like they do in Brood War.


Queens also currently provide the only form of anti-air from a unit available before Lair, they are able to heal units and structures and Creep Tumors are currently one of the most powerful tools that any race has.

Even if you think that Creep should be nerfed, these are all simply MUCH bigger facets of the race than just what the Mothership Core used to provide. The fact that Protoss is still a work in progress for replacing that unit should give you an idea of how difficult it would be to remove Queens.

Like I said, the goal is a worthwhile one, but we couldn't even begin to try without serious consideration for everything involved in doing it.

You do know that Zerg used to have a hatchery tech anti-air unit, right?


Oh I'm aware, but say we move Hydralisks to Tier 1. Would they be balanced at Tier 1? I don't think so, especially vs Protoss, Hydralisk busts are already meta in ZvP in Brood War, and if Hydralisks got moved to Hatch Tech I certainly think they would become an issue in the match up.

That's only one issue I can think of happening if we just swap Hydralisks to tier 1 without any other changes.

This also still wouldn't change anything about Queens' other roles.
aka: KTVindicare the Geeky Bartender
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland26265 Posts
September 19 2025 00:45 GMT
#57
On September 19 2025 09:13 Vindicare605 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 09:08 WombaT wrote:
Protoss will get absolutely fucking butchered if those storm changes go through, what the fuck is that?

Terrans and Zergs will just run through it and kill you.

Luckily Toss can count on the Colossus to fill the AoE role. Wait, Vikings are also cheaper now?

The whole point of surveillance mode is just to stick observers in place, it always was. If that’s an issue, I’d argue nerf its vision range in that mode slightly, be less F2 friendly. Not the opposite. What’s the point in having observers with a bit more vision range that can be killed by anything that can shoot up?

Siege tanks can’t be abducted I also don’t like. Why siege tanks specifically? From my understanding a lot of non-pro players already struggle playing versus mech, so let’s make it harder?

Why not Collosus and Disruptors? Unless you hit a really sharp timing, Vipers render Robo-centric play borderline useless. Indeed, it’s why Toss players go Airtoss in the first place.

Other stuff, I think there’s some interesting tweaks, and other stuff I’m not sure on, but interested to see how it plays out.

The Templar change will completely make Toss unviable at the top level at least, there’s nothing to compensate properly. Templars now suck, so you have to look at another AoE option. Well, if it’s Colossus Terran can squeeze more Vikings out, and Disruptors are already suffering from their last nerf.

In PvZ if Temps now suck, you will just die. Either you play the current meta, and Zergs will just run through your storms and kill you, or you adapt and go Robo, and Zergs will make a few vipers and laugh at you



Apparently the Storm change specifically we can directly blame on Harstem.

I seriously don't understand what the thought process is on it at all.

I don’t doubt Harstem had the idea. Of pro players he’s quite reasonable in identifying potential issues with his own race, better than most.

But I would assume Harstem had a minor tweak in mind.

He probably said storm is brutally punishing, especially at lower levels and people maybe should get a little more time to mitigate the damage.

I doubt he advocated for a storm nerf that will basically enable you to just walk through it.
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
BonitiilloO
Profile Joined June 2013
Dominican Republic627 Posts
September 19 2025 00:57 GMT
#58
Queens do not need to be removed, they need to get a cost increase or a supply cost increase, the unit fills so many roles for the price/supply it cost.
How may help u?
TeamMamba
Profile Joined June 2025
192 Posts
September 19 2025 01:09 GMT
#59
On September 19 2025 09:08 WombaT wrote:
Protoss will get absolutely fucking butchered if those storm changes go through, what the fuck is that?

Terrans and Zergs will just run through it and kill you.

Luckily Toss can count on the Colossus to fill the AoE role. Wait, Vikings are also cheaper now?

The whole point of surveillance mode is just to stick observers in place, it always was. If that’s an issue, I’d argue nerf its vision range in that mode slightly, be less F2 friendly. Not the opposite. What’s the point in having observers with a bit more vision range that can be killed by anything that can shoot up?

Siege tanks can’t be abducted I also don’t like. Why siege tanks specifically? From my understanding a lot of non-pro players already struggle playing versus mech, so let’s make it harder?

Why not Collosus and Disruptors? Unless you hit a really sharp timing, Vipers render Robo-centric play borderline useless. Indeed, it’s why Toss players go Airtoss in the first place.

Other stuff, I think there’s some interesting tweaks, and other stuff I’m not sure on, but interested to see how it plays out.

The Templar change will completely make Toss unviable at the top level at least, there’s nothing to compensate properly. Templars now suck, so you have to look at another AoE option. Well, if it’s Colossus Terran can squeeze more Vikings out, and Disruptors are already suffering from their last nerf.

In PvZ if Temps now suck, you will just die. Either you play the current meta, and Zergs will just run through your storms and kill you, or you adapt and go Robo, and Zergs will make a few vipers and laugh at you


Bio ball will literally Stim a move and crush the toss army

Lings and banes literally laugh at it. Now banes will definitely connect no matter what

Basically Terran and Zergs no longer need to bait out storms. They just need to be decisive on the attack and run though it
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland26265 Posts
September 19 2025 01:11 GMT
#60
On September 19 2025 10:09 TeamMamba wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2025 09:08 WombaT wrote:
Protoss will get absolutely fucking butchered if those storm changes go through, what the fuck is that?

Terrans and Zergs will just run through it and kill you.

Luckily Toss can count on the Colossus to fill the AoE role. Wait, Vikings are also cheaper now?

The whole point of surveillance mode is just to stick observers in place, it always was. If that’s an issue, I’d argue nerf its vision range in that mode slightly, be less F2 friendly. Not the opposite. What’s the point in having observers with a bit more vision range that can be killed by anything that can shoot up?

Siege tanks can’t be abducted I also don’t like. Why siege tanks specifically? From my understanding a lot of non-pro players already struggle playing versus mech, so let’s make it harder?

Why not Collosus and Disruptors? Unless you hit a really sharp timing, Vipers render Robo-centric play borderline useless. Indeed, it’s why Toss players go Airtoss in the first place.

Other stuff, I think there’s some interesting tweaks, and other stuff I’m not sure on, but interested to see how it plays out.

The Templar change will completely make Toss unviable at the top level at least, there’s nothing to compensate properly. Templars now suck, so you have to look at another AoE option. Well, if it’s Colossus Terran can squeeze more Vikings out, and Disruptors are already suffering from their last nerf.

In PvZ if Temps now suck, you will just die. Either you play the current meta, and Zergs will just run through your storms and kill you, or you adapt and go Robo, and Zergs will make a few vipers and laugh at you


Bio ball will literally Stim a move and crush the toss army

Lings and banes literally laugh at it. Now banes will definitely connect no matter what

Basically Terran and Zergs no longer need to bait out storms. They just need to be decisive on the attack and run though it

Yep.

I’m not very good at the game, and even I think I could just engage through the new Storm, what the fuck is a Clem going to do?

I mean I know we’re in the phase of a bunch of ideas, not all will make it into an actual patch. But this, it just can’t make it in, it’s crazy
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 14 15 16 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
HomeStory Cup 28 - Playoffs
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 150
FoxeR 90
StarCraft: Brood War
PianO 410
ggaemo 285
Larva 195
Leta 135
Noble 55
soO 31
ajuk12(nOOB) 26
GoRush 22
zelot 16
NotJumperer 1
Dota 2
XaKoH 894
NeuroSwarm129
League of Legends
JimRising 752
Counter-Strike
m0e_tv571
Other Games
summit1g8266
C9.Mang0378
Mew2King30
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV84
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 7
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 37
• davetesta20
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 5
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Scarra2825
• Lourlo1528
• HappyZerGling180
Upcoming Events
PiG Sty Festival
1h 30m
Serral vs YoungYakov
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2h 30m
Replay Cast
16h 30m
Replay Cast
1d 1h
Wardi Open
1d 4h
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 9h
Replay Cast
1d 16h
WardiTV Winter Champion…
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
WardiTV Winter Champion…
3 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 1st Round
LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
WardiTV Winter 2026
PiG Sty Festival 7.0
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025

Upcoming

Acropolis #4 - TS5
Jeongseon Sooper Cup
Spring Cup 2026
[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 2nd Round
[S:21] ASL SEASON OPEN 2nd Round Qualifier
Acropolis #4 - TS6
Acropolis #4
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
FISSURE Playground #3
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.