• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:19
CEST 15:19
KST 22:19
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed17Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
Heaven's Balance Suggestions (roast me) Who will win EWC 2025? Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL Soulkey Muta Micro Map? BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational 2025 ACS Season 2 Qualifier Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 744 users

Community Feedback Update - March 6 - Page 4

Forum Index > SC2 General
291 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 13 14 15 Next All
ihatevideogames
Profile Joined August 2015
570 Posts
March 07 2018 06:10 GMT
#61
On March 07 2018 14:58 MockHamill wrote:
I do not even know what to say.

Terran finally had an answer to clumped up Carriers with HT support. And you instantly nerf it.

10 more hit points on Vikings does absolut nothing in comparison. Vikings can still not be used against Carrier/HT due to storm plus no native amour so no protection against interceptors.

I could understand the move if Terran was dominating all tournaments. But every finale is a PvZ and there were only 2 Terrans in the top 12 in Katowice.

Terran is not overperforming so why nerf their only answer to the golden armada?


Think back to how fast the Liberator air damage was nerfed in early LOTV. I'm starting to believe the marketing department is forcing the balance team to keep terran with no lategame at all so they force an 'action packed' meta for the proscene.

BronzeKnee
Profile Joined March 2011
United States5217 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-03-07 06:16:05
March 07 2018 06:13 GMT
#62
On March 07 2018 14:58 MockHamill wrote:
I do not even know what to say.

Terran finally had an answer to clumped up Carriers with HT support. And you instantly nerf it.

10 more hit points on Vikings does absolut nothing in comparison. Vikings can still not be used against Carrier/HT due to storm plus no native amour so no protection against interceptors.

I could understand the move if Terran was dominating all tournaments. But every finale is a PvZ and there were only 2 Terrans in the top 12 in Katowice.

Terran is not overperforming so why nerf their only answer to the golden armada?

I need every Terran to remember when PvT was at 50%, and then Blizzard nerfed the Adept. Or when PvT was at 50% and Khaydarin Amulet was removed.

Terran has consistently had the highest win rates over the course of SC2 history. A small period without huge winrates won't hurt.

Try being Protoss, the only race that has had sub 45% win rates since January 2017. And it has happened 6 times!

http://aligulac.com/misc/balance/
ihatevideogames
Profile Joined August 2015
570 Posts
March 07 2018 06:19 GMT
#63
On March 07 2018 15:13 BronzeKnee wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 07 2018 14:58 MockHamill wrote:
I do not even know what to say.

Terran finally had an answer to clumped up Carriers with HT support. And you instantly nerf it.

10 more hit points on Vikings does absolut nothing in comparison. Vikings can still not be used against Carrier/HT due to storm plus no native amour so no protection against interceptors.

I could understand the move if Terran was dominating all tournaments. But every finale is a PvZ and there were only 2 Terrans in the top 12 in Katowice.

Terran is not overperforming so why nerf their only answer to the golden armada?

I need every Terran to remember when PvT was at 50%, and then Blizzard nerfed the Adept. Or when PvT was at 50% and Khaydarin Amulet was removed.

Terran has consistently had the highest win rates over the course of SC2 history. A small period without huge winrates won't hurt.

Try being Protoss, the only race that has had sub 45% win rates since January 2017. And it has happened 6 times!

http://aligulac.com/misc/balance/

So the correct way to balance this is to make sure every race takes turn in the gutter. Alright.
This still doesn't explain why they keep nerfing it every time terrans have a viable lategame. They could nerf something else to make sure we get our 'turn in the gutter', no?
neutralrobot
Profile Joined July 2011
Australia1025 Posts
March 07 2018 06:21 GMT
#64
On March 07 2018 15:13 BronzeKnee wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 07 2018 14:58 MockHamill wrote:
I do not even know what to say.

Terran finally had an answer to clumped up Carriers with HT support. And you instantly nerf it.

10 more hit points on Vikings does absolut nothing in comparison. Vikings can still not be used against Carrier/HT due to storm plus no native amour so no protection against interceptors.

I could understand the move if Terran was dominating all tournaments. But every finale is a PvZ and there were only 2 Terrans in the top 12 in Katowice.

Terran is not overperforming so why nerf their only answer to the golden armada?

I need every Terran to remember when PvT was at 50%, and then Blizzard nerfed the Adept. Or when PvT was at 50% and Khaydarin Amulet was removed.


Is PvT now at 50%? If I read it right, people are arguing that there's already an imbalance, that the imbalance has just barely started to be figured out, and the way it's been figured out is being nerfed. In other words, the existing imbalance is being made worse.

For my part, I have no idea. Obviously at the highest levels, terran has been doing badly lately overall. I don't know how well it generalises across skill levels. The idea of every late game turning into the same comp with the same ideas sounds like something worth avoiding, but obviously it's not worth avoiding if late game becomes severely imbalanced.
Maru | Life | PartinG || I guess I like aggressive control freaks... || Reynor will one day reign supreme || *reyn supreme
usopsama
Profile Joined April 2008
6502 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-03-07 06:29:32
March 07 2018 06:27 GMT
#65
On March 07 2018 08:11 Nerchio wrote:
Ravens are broken but taking away aggressive possibilities from Zerg once again... meh

Don't worry, you already got the worst result in group C at IEM. Even with the nerf, you can't possibly get any worst than that. The small zerg nerf will be fine.

User was temp banned for this post.
ZigguratOfUr
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Iraq16955 Posts
March 07 2018 06:33 GMT
#66
On March 07 2018 15:21 neutralrobot wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 07 2018 15:13 BronzeKnee wrote:
On March 07 2018 14:58 MockHamill wrote:
I do not even know what to say.

Terran finally had an answer to clumped up Carriers with HT support. And you instantly nerf it.

10 more hit points on Vikings does absolut nothing in comparison. Vikings can still not be used against Carrier/HT due to storm plus no native amour so no protection against interceptors.

I could understand the move if Terran was dominating all tournaments. But every finale is a PvZ and there were only 2 Terrans in the top 12 in Katowice.

Terran is not overperforming so why nerf their only answer to the golden armada?

I need every Terran to remember when PvT was at 50%, and then Blizzard nerfed the Adept. Or when PvT was at 50% and Khaydarin Amulet was removed.


Is PvT now at 50%? If I read it right, people are arguing that there's already an imbalance, that the imbalance has just barely started to be figured out, and the way it's been figured out is being nerfed. In other words, the existing imbalance is being made worse.

For my part, I have no idea. Obviously at the highest levels, terran has been doing badly lately overall. I don't know how well it generalises across skill levels. The idea of every late game turning into the same comp with the same ideas sounds like something worth avoiding, but obviously it's not worth avoiding if late game becomes severely imbalanced.


While PvT win-rates are at 50% approximately on aligulac terrans are still forced into a lot of all-ins to get that win rate (and ofc aligulac has lots of weaknesses). Playing macro Terran against Protoss right now is difficult, because chrono-ed Protoss upgrades outscale terran units really fast, and (to a lesser extent) due to the new colossus absolutely evaporating marines. I'd like to see a few nerfs targeting those two points. Redistributing the colossus's damage to do less versus light would be rather easy since colossi aren't particularly good in PvZ anyways. Nerfing Protoss upgrades is trickier since it also impacts PvZ, but I think increasing the build time for +2 and +3 might be necessary. The golden armada is tbh a rather minor issue when it comes to PvT.
bObA
Profile Joined May 2012
France300 Posts
March 07 2018 06:39 GMT
#67
On March 07 2018 07:46 DieuCure wrote:
Live just before gsl finals lol


Yea that is really not a good move imo.

Also only Maru is using ravens like this, and he is the only Terran in GSL still alive...

And that did not let him win against Rogue at IEM, so I do no think that is a real problem.
SCMasterGoD
Profile Joined January 2018
4 Posts
March 07 2018 06:41 GMT
#68
I don't understand why late game Terran is considered bad. I'm a low GM toss and I ALWAYS lose late game Pvt. I just feel like I can't do anything vs Viking ghost, emp rips my ground and Viking my colossus. The end.
If I get tempest to chip away the terran army he just a moves into me. I just don't understand it. In pro games this is never the case because the game ends much earlier.

Also seeing in pro games zvt ghost snipes are amazing late game, maybe too hard to pull off due to fungal broods? Possibly increase its range
Charoisaur
Profile Joined August 2014
Germany15928 Posts
March 07 2018 06:57 GMT
#69
Like the terran changes but why not just remove the stacking from the AA missile?
Many of the coolest moments in sc2 happen due to worker harassment
Popparockz
Profile Joined April 2011
United States40 Posts
March 07 2018 07:08 GMT
#70
Raven missles need nerfed for the same reason parasitic bomb needed to be nerfed. Being able to stack AOEs is always going to cause issues in the late game. You end up in the position where the player can create a circle of death because the only limiting factor on how much damage he can deal in the circle instantly is the amount of energy he has. Is the viking buff enough? IDK. TY was doing really well in crazy late game against dark with ghost liberator. He only lost the last game because he attacked into broodlords with all of his liberators and got fungaled. Regardless mass raven missiles is bad for the game and everyone knows it.
Charoisaur
Profile Joined August 2014
Germany15928 Posts
March 07 2018 07:35 GMT
#71
Is +10HP enough?
Would it be broken if they made it +15?
Many of the coolest moments in sc2 happen due to worker harassment
Drfilip
Profile Joined March 2013
Sweden590 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-03-07 07:55:30
March 07 2018 07:44 GMT
#72
On March 07 2018 12:16 Loccstana wrote:
I have never seen a single pro game where it is won single highhandedly due to Ravens. If someone has an example, please post.

The above quote is the clearest of all of those who don't understand why the raven nerf is needed. Can someone not on mobile (I am lying in bed writing this) share a couple of raven clips?

On another note: if the terran lategame is so bad why not give late game upgrades to terran? Fusion core required upgrades would be late game options. Upgrade to make marauders shot their old rounds, one shot for 10 damage instead of two shots for 5 each. Upgrade to give thor 2 more javeline missiles and a boost to their single target AA damage. Upgrade hellion/hellbat armour by 1, or give either of them a movement speed upgrade. An increase to ghost range, be it steady target or base attack.
The advanced ballistics upgrade is a current late game upgrade. I think terran could use some more of those, but not too many.
Random Platinum EU
Mun_Su
Profile Joined December 2012
France2063 Posts
March 07 2018 07:50 GMT
#73
I thought the raven maybe needed a little speed reduction on the missile. But instead they divise by 6 the damages and add 10 hp to the viking, ok

INno <3 - TY - Maru - Taeja - Rain <3 - Classic <3 - Stephano <3 - soO <3 - Soulkey - Dark - SERRAL =O / END REGION LOCK
engesser1
Profile Blog Joined December 2016
264 Posts
March 07 2018 07:51 GMT
#74
Probably every single terran hates them now. Arghhh!!
Maru, he is the reason why i'm still playing and watching sc2
Tyrhanius
Profile Joined April 2011
France947 Posts
March 07 2018 07:51 GMT
#75
That's removing every agressive options for zerg on early game.
Back to turtle again like on WOL/HOTS without any possibilities to surprise the other.

Also vikings will become more powerful than corruptors while cheaper.

I guess the balance is more decided with cries than thoughts.
omop
Profile Joined April 2017
42 Posts
March 07 2018 07:58 GMT
#76
Why not just increase raven supply cost. 3 supply per raven and terrans can't spam that many ravens without sacrificing core army.
Or just make dmg nerf much smaller. Like 30->20. I think 20 dmg missiles would already to the trick and 5 dmg is pure overkill.
spenzzer
Profile Joined March 2018
19 Posts
March 07 2018 08:12 GMT
#77
On March 07 2018 09:06 Sibayah wrote:
Show nested quote +
Next, we’ve been seeing a lot of games where Anti-Armor Missile spam becomes the determining factor in the late game in all three Terran matchups.

Next, we’ve been seeing a lot of games where Anti-Terran Nerfhammer spam becomes the determining factor in the late game in all three Terran matchups....

Skytoss is the dermining factor in lategame Protoss for years and never seemed to be a problem...

Storm -> ha ha terran learn to play and learn to split !
Colossus -> ha ha terran learn to play and learn to split !
Baneling -> ha ha terran learn to play and learn to split !
Raven -> ha ha nerf terran !
CQFD

User was banned for this post.

Yeah i was laughing my ass off when Tod said in one game IEM toss has a lot problems with getting used to split units :D Sure its fine if Terrans have to split again banelings, Storms, Colossus, Disrutors, Vipers. But if Toss and Zerg have to learn it naaaaaah to op
Ej_
Profile Blog Joined January 2013
47656 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-03-07 08:47:59
March 07 2018 08:45 GMT
#78
On March 07 2018 17:12 spenzzer wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 07 2018 09:06 Sibayah wrote:
Next, we’ve been seeing a lot of games where Anti-Armor Missile spam becomes the determining factor in the late game in all three Terran matchups.

Next, we’ve been seeing a lot of games where Anti-Terran Nerfhammer spam becomes the determining factor in the late game in all three Terran matchups....

Skytoss is the dermining factor in lategame Protoss for years and never seemed to be a problem...

Storm -> ha ha terran learn to play and learn to split !
Colossus -> ha ha terran learn to play and learn to split !
Baneling -> ha ha terran learn to play and learn to split !
Raven -> ha ha nerf terran !
CQFD

User was banned for this post.

Yeah i was laughing my ass off when Tod said in one game IEM toss has a lot problems with getting used to split units :D Sure its fine if Terrans have to split again banelings, Storms, Colossus, Disrutors, Vipers. But if Toss and Zerg have to learn it naaaaaah to op

Zerg and protoss units cant stim and the raven missile is instant.
Imagine storm doing all of its dmg in 1s or banelings with blink.

Also funny how people say that drop was zerg's only aggressive option in early ZvP rigth after Rogue and Dark did dropless roach all-ins at IEM. Also a baneling bust in Dark's case (vs Trap).
"Technically the dictionary has zero authority on the meaning or words" - Rodya
hiroshOne
Profile Joined October 2015
Poland425 Posts
March 07 2018 08:53 GMT
#79
Solar was trying to micro out from anti armour missiles and failed. Its not possible to outmicro AAM. Its faster than old seeker missile.

Yes. Dorperlords were the only agressive option for Zerg that is not an allin. Those roach pushes or baneling bust, were allins. With droperlord u could still follow up into mavro game.
Ultima Ratio Regum
Marvel1
Profile Joined January 2018
5 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-03-07 09:30:41
March 07 2018 09:12 GMT
#80
On March 07 2018 15:41 SCMasterGoD wrote:
I don't understand why late game Terran is considered bad. I'm a low GM toss and I ALWAYS lose late game Pvt. I just feel like I can't do anything vs Viking ghost, emp rips my ground and Viking my colossus. The end.
If I get tempest to chip away the terran army he just a moves into me. I just don't understand it. In pro games this is never the case because the game ends much earlier.

Also seeing in pro games zvt ghost snipes are amazing late game, maybe too hard to pull off due to fungal broods? Possibly increase its range


I agree 100%, Mass ghosts not only do like 2k dmg in 5 seconds by emping but also melts zealots like they are nothing, its a struggle to cast good storms and the beef of P is demolished so fast
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 13 14 15 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Epic.LAN
12:00
Epic.LAN 45 Playoffs Stage
Liquipedia
CranKy Ducklings
10:00
Sea Duckling Open #136
CranKy Ducklings142
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Hui .75
StarCraft: Brood War
actioN 3741
Barracks 3110
Mini 1204
Hyuk 964
Larva 919
Stork 633
firebathero 416
Soma 336
Last 249
Dewaltoss 235
[ Show more ]
GuemChi 234
TY 154
Hyun 130
Light 124
ToSsGirL 95
Pusan 92
Bonyth 69
Backho 49
GoRush 20
SilentControl 8
Dota 2
Gorgc7894
singsing2672
qojqva1700
Fuzer 188
canceldota94
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K306
sgares302
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor243
Other Games
B2W.Neo1851
DeMusliM457
Lowko214
Trikslyr26
ArmadaUGS17
Rex14
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2843
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH276
• Legendk 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 3
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis1936
• Jankos1105
Upcoming Events
CSO Contender
3h 41m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
20h 41m
Online Event
1d 2h
Esports World Cup
2 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
3 days
Esports World Cup
4 days
Esports World Cup
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
Championship of Russia 2025
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.