• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 18:40
CEST 00:40
KST 07:40
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202529RSL Season 1 - Final Week8[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams1Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster Why doesnt SC2 scene costream tournaments
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame
Brood War
General
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL Corsair Pursuit Micro?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread BWCL Season 63 Announcement
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 619 users

Community Feedback Update - March 6 - Page 5

Forum Index > SC2 General
291 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 13 14 15 Next All
ZigguratOfUr
Profile Blog Joined April 2012
Iraq16955 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-03-07 09:41:24
March 07 2018 09:38 GMT
#81
On March 07 2018 17:53 hiroshOne wrote:
Solar was trying to micro out from anti armour missiles and failed. Its not possible to outmicro AAM. Its faster than old seeker missile.

Yes. Dorperlords were the only agressive option for Zerg that is not an allin. Those roach pushes or baneling bust, were allins. With droperlord u could still follow up into mavro game.


Let's be real. 90% of the time people went for drop overlords early on it was just an all-in. Sure you could go for harass, but you were most of the time better off all-inning.

On March 07 2018 15:41 SCMasterGoD wrote:
I don't understand why late game Terran is considered bad. I'm a low GM toss and I ALWAYS lose late game Pvt. I just feel like I can't do anything vs Viking ghost, emp rips my ground and Viking my colossus. The end.
If I get tempest to chip away the terran army he just a moves into me. I just don't understand it. In pro games this is never the case because the game ends much earlier.

Also seeing in pro games zvt ghost snipes are amazing late game, maybe too hard to pull off due to fungal broods? Possibly increase its range


Ghost/viking beating protoss late game armies? Are you still playing HotS?
EESCLuna
Profile Joined February 2017
Spain53 Posts
March 07 2018 09:54 GMT
#82
We lived 7 years of vikings vs colossus. Now vikings live more thanks to the stalker attack cooldown nerf and want to buff them more ? Mass viking no medevac 1-a gg wp
Balance means nerf Protoss
Mun_Su
Profile Joined December 2012
France2063 Posts
March 07 2018 10:07 GMT
#83
On March 07 2018 17:53 hiroshOne wrote:
Solar was trying to micro out from anti armour missiles and failed. Its not possible to outmicro AAM. Its faster than old seeker missile.

Yes. Dorperlords were the only agressive option for Zerg that is not an allin. Those roach pushes or baneling bust, were allins. With droperlord u could still follow up into mavro game.



This was quite new, of course he can't still micro properly.
INno <3 - TY - Maru - Taeja - Rain <3 - Classic <3 - Stephano <3 - soO <3 - Soulkey - Dark - SERRAL =O / END REGION LOCK
neutralrobot
Profile Joined July 2011
Australia1025 Posts
March 07 2018 10:16 GMT
#84
On March 07 2018 15:33 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 07 2018 15:21 neutralrobot wrote:
On March 07 2018 15:13 BronzeKnee wrote:
On March 07 2018 14:58 MockHamill wrote:
I do not even know what to say.

Terran finally had an answer to clumped up Carriers with HT support. And you instantly nerf it.

10 more hit points on Vikings does absolut nothing in comparison. Vikings can still not be used against Carrier/HT due to storm plus no native amour so no protection against interceptors.

I could understand the move if Terran was dominating all tournaments. But every finale is a PvZ and there were only 2 Terrans in the top 12 in Katowice.

Terran is not overperforming so why nerf their only answer to the golden armada?

I need every Terran to remember when PvT was at 50%, and then Blizzard nerfed the Adept. Or when PvT was at 50% and Khaydarin Amulet was removed.


Is PvT now at 50%? If I read it right, people are arguing that there's already an imbalance, that the imbalance has just barely started to be figured out, and the way it's been figured out is being nerfed. In other words, the existing imbalance is being made worse.

For my part, I have no idea. Obviously at the highest levels, terran has been doing badly lately overall. I don't know how well it generalises across skill levels. The idea of every late game turning into the same comp with the same ideas sounds like something worth avoiding, but obviously it's not worth avoiding if late game becomes severely imbalanced.


While PvT win-rates are at 50% approximately on aligulac terrans are still forced into a lot of all-ins to get that win rate (and ofc aligulac has lots of weaknesses). Playing macro Terran against Protoss right now is difficult, because chrono-ed Protoss upgrades outscale terran units really fast, and (to a lesser extent) due to the new colossus absolutely evaporating marines. I'd like to see a few nerfs targeting those two points. Redistributing the colossus's damage to do less versus light would be rather easy since colossi aren't particularly good in PvZ anyways. Nerfing Protoss upgrades is trickier since it also impacts PvZ, but I think increasing the build time for +2 and +3 might be necessary. The golden armada is tbh a rather minor issue when it comes to PvT.


At a glance, it seems like Aligulac suggests that PvT win rates are at 50% or so now after a recent drop from P dominance. Do we think this is because of a meta shift toward ravens? Again, honest question. I don't know what to make of it.
Maru | Life | PartinG || I guess I like aggressive control freaks... || Reynor will one day reign supreme || *reyn supreme
Snarosc
Profile Joined January 2016
France66 Posts
March 07 2018 10:34 GMT
#85
Finally ! Droperlords are a nightmare as Protoss if your build / wall / execution isn't perfect.
The anti armor missile nerf is good aswell, it is named "ANTI-ARMOR" after all.
It isn't supposed to do direct damage but make damage by immensely increasing the dps of an upgraded bioball during the late game, allowing the terran to stay on MMM and do well against its biggest threats like Ultralisks.

Nice buff to the viking, a unit way too fragile for its cost.

I also see some posts asking for nerfs to the colossus in PvT following this patch...
And I wonder if these people seriously play this game / watch the pros. Most Protoss have stopped rushing colossus in PvT and don't use them until late (where they're not that amazing) because the terran has a huge window where a bio push with the support of 1 SINGLE raven will absolutely destroy the Protoss army if you just use interference matrix on the colossus (50 energy each, you easily have 2 available when the push hits, and if the Protoss went colossus he clearly doesnt have HT to feedback the raven).

Nice job Blizzard on this one, even though I still think hydras and / or lurkers have to be addressed in some way.

Stats is the best player of LotV.
Daimai
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Sweden762 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-03-07 10:42:20
March 07 2018 10:40 GMT
#86
Cool changes, opens up PvZ quite a lot!

On March 07 2018 15:41 SCMasterGoD wrote:
I don't understand why late game Terran is considered bad. I'm a low GM toss and I ALWAYS lose late game Pvt. I just feel like I can't do anything vs Viking ghost, emp rips my ground and Viking my colossus. The end.
If I get tempest to chip away the terran army he just a moves into me. I just don't understand it. In pro games this is never the case because the game ends much earlier.

Also seeing in pro games zvt ghost snipes are amazing late game, maybe too hard to pull off due to fungal broods? Possibly increase its range


Many terrans just play their standard "2base push until either the protoss dies or they're way too far behind"-strat and then they blame imbalance when they're outteched. A good late game T is really scary.
To pray is to accept defeat.
xongnox
Profile Joined November 2011
540 Posts
March 07 2018 10:46 GMT
#87
On March 07 2018 19:16 neutralrobot wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 07 2018 15:33 ZigguratOfUr wrote:
On March 07 2018 15:21 neutralrobot wrote:
On March 07 2018 15:13 BronzeKnee wrote:
On March 07 2018 14:58 MockHamill wrote:
I do not even know what to say.

Terran finally had an answer to clumped up Carriers with HT support. And you instantly nerf it.

10 more hit points on Vikings does absolut nothing in comparison. Vikings can still not be used against Carrier/HT due to storm plus no native amour so no protection against interceptors.

I could understand the move if Terran was dominating all tournaments. But every finale is a PvZ and there were only 2 Terrans in the top 12 in Katowice.

Terran is not overperforming so why nerf their only answer to the golden armada?

I need every Terran to remember when PvT was at 50%, and then Blizzard nerfed the Adept. Or when PvT was at 50% and Khaydarin Amulet was removed.


Is PvT now at 50%? If I read it right, people are arguing that there's already an imbalance, that the imbalance has just barely started to be figured out, and the way it's been figured out is being nerfed. In other words, the existing imbalance is being made worse.

For my part, I have no idea. Obviously at the highest levels, terran has been doing badly lately overall. I don't know how well it generalises across skill levels. The idea of every late game turning into the same comp with the same ideas sounds like something worth avoiding, but obviously it's not worth avoiding if late game becomes severely imbalanced.


While PvT win-rates are at 50% approximately on aligulac terrans are still forced into a lot of all-ins to get that win rate (and ofc aligulac has lots of weaknesses). Playing macro Terran against Protoss right now is difficult, because chrono-ed Protoss upgrades outscale terran units really fast, and (to a lesser extent) due to the new colossus absolutely evaporating marines. I'd like to see a few nerfs targeting those two points. Redistributing the colossus's damage to do less versus light would be rather easy since colossi aren't particularly good in PvZ anyways. Nerfing Protoss upgrades is trickier since it also impacts PvZ, but I think increasing the build time for +2 and +3 might be necessary. The golden armada is tbh a rather minor issue when it comes to PvT.


At a glance, it seems like Aligulac suggests that PvT win rates are at 50% or so now after a recent drop from P dominance. Do we think this is because of a meta shift toward ravens? Again, honest question. I don't know what to make of it.


Not enough raven games at all vs protoss at pro level. that's why this subject and nerf-hammer is kinda ironic.

Aligulac stats doesn't means a lot about balance. We already discussed this topic in length, but in short this is this way of seeing this that led to unerfed bl/infestor for a year.... stats were fine, blizzard said (and they were)...
Recent shit is probably because some top korean terrans wining foreigners (at IEM) and second class players (in online cups etc). Doesn't means anything.

From aligulac stats, individual MU results of top players means more. Best KR protoss near 80% PvT, while the best terrans are at 60% TvP.

Terran issues in TvP when not 2-base all-ining is first and foremost the openings. Terran begins the race so much behind, Protoss can pay whatever tech-advantage they want (like 2xupgrades and fast 4th and stomr or collosi..) while still having a better army and eco.
If Protoss would not start the game so much ahead 2xforge wouldn't be such an issue because, like in PvZ, they you would not afford it without sacrificing a lot of other things.




sneakyfox
Profile Joined January 2017
8216 Posts
March 07 2018 10:50 GMT
#88
The Raven change makes a lot of sense but there is no way the health buff to vikings balances things out. Terrans briefly had late game but it's gone again.

I agree that a BC buff is the way forward.
"I saw what sneakyfox wrote on TL.net and it made me furious" - PartinG
xongnox
Profile Joined November 2011
540 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-03-07 12:55:48
March 07 2018 11:02 GMT
#89
On March 07 2018 19:40 Daimai wrote:
Cool changes, opens up PvZ quite a lot!

Show nested quote +
On March 07 2018 15:41 SCMasterGoD wrote:
I don't understand why late game Terran is considered bad. I'm a low GM toss and I ALWAYS lose late game Pvt. I just feel like I can't do anything vs Viking ghost, emp rips my ground and Viking my colossus. The end.
If I get tempest to chip away the terran army he just a moves into me. I just don't understand it. In pro games this is never the case because the game ends much earlier.

Also seeing in pro games zvt ghost snipes are amazing late game, maybe too hard to pull off due to fungal broods? Possibly increase its range


Many terrans just play their standard "2base push until either the protoss dies or they're way too far behind"-strat and then they blame imbalance when they're outteched. A good late game T is really scary.


And why do you think every Terran, even those who played macro for years in the MU, play that ? We are in the situation of "killing the zerg before infestor/bl or die". This may be balanced or not stats-wise but everyone forced into this is trash gameplay.

Late game T may or may not be scary if properly executed. But (except some maps, like neon violet) terran is not allowed to go late game vs Toss, they simply die way earlier. (like, when protoss hits 3/3 and a-move + warp-prism storm to LOL ).



SlammerSC2
Profile Joined April 2013
77 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-03-07 11:10:58
March 07 2018 11:06 GMT
#90
WOW. I think i suggested moving overlord drop to lair tech like 2-3 years ago. Glad Blizzard are listening to the community. Also 10 hp buff to Vikings? if they had made it 100 hp then maybe it would change terrans chances vs air play.
RoflStomped
Profile Joined July 2017
Iceland21 Posts
March 07 2018 11:14 GMT
#91
It seems the "balance team" just don't know what to do with the raven. It's undergone so many changes since the major shift last year. They seem to have tunnel vision when it comes to creating an effective late game option without aggravating the community.
Lokxpr
Profile Joined December 2017
24 Posts
March 07 2018 11:15 GMT
#92
On March 07 2018 20:02 xongnox wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 07 2018 19:40 Daimai wrote:
Cool changes, opens up PvZ quite a lot!

On March 07 2018 15:41 SCMasterGoD wrote:
I don't understand why late game Terran is considered bad. I'm a low GM toss and I ALWAYS lose late game Pvt. I just feel like I can't do anything vs Viking ghost, emp rips my ground and Viking my colossus. The end.
If I get tempest to chip away the terran army he just a moves into me. I just don't understand it. In pro games this is never the case because the game ends much earlier.

Also seeing in pro games zvt ghost snipes are amazing late game, maybe too hard to pull off due to fungal broods? Possibly increase its range


Many terrans just play their standard "2base push until either the protoss dies or they're way too far behind"-strat and then they blame imbalance when they're outteched. A good late game T is really scary.


And why do you think every Terran, even those who played macro for years in the MU, play that ? We are in the situation of "killing the zerg before infestor/bl or die". This may be balanced or not stats-wise but everyone forced into this is trash gameplay.

Late game T may or may not be scary if properly executed. But (except some maps, like agora) terran is not allowed to go late game vs Toss, they simply die way earlier. (like, when protoss hits 3/3 and a-move + warp-prism storm to LOL ).





Yes the fact that toss can outmacro and outupgrade the terran earlier in the game would be an issue, but late game TvP is not bad at all, terran has all the tools to beat protoss.
egrimm
Profile Joined September 2011
Poland1199 Posts
March 07 2018 11:15 GMT
#93
On March 07 2018 10:01 brickrd wrote:
the problem with ling drops is more than just holding them but, as others have said, that it forces out early defense in the main mineral line as well as stargate units to shut down drop ovies.

i have been a Z/P player for years, and i love the new dropperlords, but speaking objectively as someone who plays both matchups there's too much flexibility in how zerg can play out the game. holding the allins is entirely possible, but there's zero margin for error in any detail of your build, your wall and your micro, it's a highly practiced and unforgiving early game interaction that makes the game less fun in PVZ.

i would compare it to when PVZ cannon rushing was extremely safe and extremely frustrating to play against back in HOTS. it's not really that PVZ is imba because of unit interactions (once you get to midgame protoss is fine), but it feels extremely stunted and scripted from the protoss point of view. there's almost no way to mix it up early as toss without dying to a lot of popular high-percentage allins.

i don't feel like it's fair for protoss to be punished for greedy walling the natural when they HAVE TO wall the natural to play a macro game. there's no "safer option" for protoss builds, if you don't gate expand you're fucked. with the mineral growth rate of LOTV you can't even do one base tech builds anymore because the pylon timings aren't right


This post really nicely sumarizes the problems with hatch droperlords.
I'd just add that there is a reason that Protoss has to wall-off against zerg since sc1 - the larva mechanic + fast massable zergling makes that it is really hard to defend against early ling rushes/all-ins. Drop available for zerg so fast allows to bypass the wall and invalid its' purpose.
The stategy is not undefendable but it limits the protoss strategies and pigeon-hole protoss play to one build/set of reactions and on top of that requires perfect execution to hold as any mistep with rewalling is game ending even in lower leagues.
sOs TY PartinG
insitelol
Profile Joined August 2012
845 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-03-07 11:29:39
March 07 2018 11:27 GMT
#94
Ok, blizzard.
I fully support the direction of the changes, but seriously, please consider removing nydus from the game. Lets be honest here: NOONE EVER uses it outside of allins. Its a goddamn forgotten mechanic so that nobody even remembers why it was added to the game (some BW reference i assume). There is no way (literally no way) of scouting it in PvZ. You just cant see it coming, but defending it is such a pain in the ass, you literally need to prepare accrodingly for 2+ minutes.
Zerg is out of hand these days,its obvious for everyone.
In the early game Zerg has:
Speedling floods
Speedling drops (and btw if they hit the right timing SG alone wont keep you safe, you simply wont be able to shoot down dropalords fast enough).
Baneling busts/drops
Ravager/roach timings
Nydus
Queen drops
All these strats needs an apropriate response. You should know exactly what you are doing and how to react. Its much more complicated and punishing than a common: "just go SG and you are safe". Tell that sOs and Classic.

while Protoss has nothing, literally no early game cheeses. Just a 5 min zealot allin that is easily scouted. It's so easy to defend i wont even bother mentioning it.

Then, transitioning into mid game, zerg again can throw in ANY units: mutas, hydra/banes, hydra/roaches into lurkers, all kind of 3rd pushes (with extremely strong timings) with mass banes/mass lurkers etc etc. While protoss... ok we got an option either we go 1 robo or 2 robo... nice.

After deflecting of whatever is coming from zerg in mid game (or may be they just macroed like crazy) we need to start worring about BLs. Should i hit him now with what i got or begin transitioning to tempest/carriers, mmm such an interesting choice.

And then, we got lategame. Ye, those carrier haters are all over the place. But where did the come from? early 2017 when intereceptors were free? These days, it SUPER hard to make a decent lategame comp for protoss. And by decent i mean Carrier based (12+). Any other Tempest/VR BS comps just dont work vs corruptors/mass spores/vipers/etc. Zerg lategame comp is much more flexible and stronger if you ask me. Just look at Classic vs Rogue on neon. What was classic doing wrong? Point it out please because i cant see a single flaw in his game.

Ok, to summ it up. I really dont mind a challenging MU, but zerg has WAY too many options on every stage of the game.

Removing nydus, moving drops to lair, and toning down lurker just a bit (reducing its range by 1 lets say) wont hurt the game at all.
Less is more.
MockHamill
Profile Joined March 2010
Sweden1798 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-03-07 11:34:37
March 07 2018 11:33 GMT
#95
The Viking hitpoint increase is no where near enough to make it possible for Terran to fight against the Carrier/HT combo.

I suggest either
1) Decrease the leach range of Carriers to 10 so that Terran does not have to fly through so many storm just to get to the Carriers OR
2) Make Viking have 1 native armor. It would not change much against most air units but it would be very useful against Carriers, a unit that Vikings are supposed to counter but can not.
insitelol
Profile Joined August 2012
845 Posts
March 07 2018 11:37 GMT
#96
On March 07 2018 20:33 MockHamill wrote:
The Viking hitpoint increase is no where near enough to make it possible for Terran to fight against the Carrier/HT combo.

I suggest either
1) Decrease the leach range of Carriers to 10 so that Terran does not have to fly through so many storm just to get to the Carriers OR
2) Make Viking have 1 native armor. It would not change much against most air units but it would be very useful against Carriers, a unit that Vikings are supposed to counter but can not.

Is it really a thing: carrier based tvp? no sarcasm, just wondering.
Less is more.
MockHamill
Profile Joined March 2010
Sweden1798 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-03-07 11:54:50
March 07 2018 11:52 GMT
#97
On March 07 2018 20:37 insitelol wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 07 2018 20:33 MockHamill wrote:
The Viking hitpoint increase is no where near enough to make it possible for Terran to fight against the Carrier/HT combo.

I suggest either
1) Decrease the leach range of Carriers to 10 so that Terran does not have to fly through so many storm just to get to the Carriers OR
2) Make Viking have 1 native armor. It would not change much against most air units but it would be very useful against Carriers, a unit that Vikings are supposed to counter but can not.

Is it really a thing: carrier based tvp? no sarcasm, just wondering.


Yes. I think almost every Protoss I play (if the game goes to late game) transitions to Carrier/HT (plus support). It seems to be the go-to combo for late game Protoss.


egrimm
Profile Joined September 2011
Poland1199 Posts
March 07 2018 11:53 GMT
#98
On March 07 2018 20:27 insitelol wrote:
(...) please consider removing nydus from the game (...)

I think that nydus could be simply reworked to be less of all-in tool and more for fast transfering the armies.
I'd propose:
Reduce health from 200 to 100
Allow to be attacked when underground but up armour from 1 to 3 or 4 when underground so simple worker pull will not kill it but the actual fighting units could snipe it (armour will remain 1 once the nydus emerges from the ground)
reduce the cost from 100/100 to 50/50
sOs TY PartinG
Mun_Su
Profile Joined December 2012
France2063 Posts
March 07 2018 11:54 GMT
#99
Why not adding a anti air special weapon for BC? the same DPS that main weapon but with a little more range, less rate of fire (and more power by shoot) and a special ability that ignore every armor upgrade (so it ignore every point of armor that the corruptor have, but it also ignore the effect of the raven AA missile, so it can't snowball it).
INno <3 - TY - Maru - Taeja - Rain <3 - Classic <3 - Stephano <3 - soO <3 - Soulkey - Dark - SERRAL =O / END REGION LOCK
egrimm
Profile Joined September 2011
Poland1199 Posts
March 07 2018 11:58 GMT
#100
On March 07 2018 20:52 MockHamill wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 07 2018 20:37 insitelol wrote:
On March 07 2018 20:33 MockHamill wrote:
The Viking hitpoint increase is no where near enough to make it possible for Terran to fight against the Carrier/HT combo.

I suggest either
1) Decrease the leach range of Carriers to 10 so that Terran does not have to fly through so many storm just to get to the Carriers OR
2) Make Viking have 1 native armor. It would not change much against most air units but it would be very useful against Carriers, a unit that Vikings are supposed to counter but can not.

Is it really a thing: carrier based tvp? no sarcasm, just wondering.


Yes. I think almost every Protoss I play (if the game goes to late game) transitions to Carrier/HT (plus support).


I can only speak for myself but I usually only do it vs mech comps from Terrans. 2nd robo for immortals -> storm + fast switch to carriers.
Sometimes I do go for Carrier/HT vs bio when the opponent decides to turtle heavily after unsuccessful midgame but one may argue that at this it is already over.
sOs TY PartinG
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 13 14 15 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 11h 20m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nathanias 215
Livibee 124
Liquid`TLO 120
ForJumy 53
StarCraft: Brood War
Hyuk 443
Aegong 75
NaDa 31
League of Legends
Dendi1110
syndereN243
Counter-Strike
fl0m2022
Fnx 1485
flusha247
Other Games
summit1g11124
tarik_tv7579
Grubby3079
FrodaN1909
C9.Mang0224
ViBE124
Maynarde98
Sick47
rubinoeu11
Liquid`Ken10
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV20
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• RyuSc2 28
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Diggity16
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22421
League of Legends
• Doublelift4944
Other Games
• imaqtpie1419
• Scarra1001
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
11h 20m
ByuN vs Zoun
SHIN vs TriGGeR
Cyan vs ShoWTimE
Rogue vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs Solar
Reynor vs Maru
herO vs Cure
Serral vs Classic
Esports World Cup
1d 11h
Esports World Cup
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.