• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 06:15
CEST 12:15
KST 19:15
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview25Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL46Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator4[ASL19] Finals Preview: Daunting Task30
Community News
[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates7GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th12Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0EWC 2025 Regional Qualifier Results26Code S RO12 Results + RO8 Groups (2025 Season 2)3
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Magnus Carlsen and Fabi review Clem's chess game. BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th
Tourneys
Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Bellum Gens Elite: Stara Zagora 2025 $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Cheeseadelphia 2025 - Open Bracket LAN!
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance Mutation # 473 Cold is the Void
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans? BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ I made an ASL quiz [BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 2 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 1
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Mechabellum
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0 Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Cognitive styles x game perf…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Poker
Nebuchad
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 24807 users

Power Rank - August 31st

Forum Index > SC2 General
75 CommentsPost a Reply
Normal

Power Rank - August 31st

Text byTL.net ESPORTS
Graphics byshiroiusagi
August 31st, 2017 09:36 GMT
  • ?
    Power Rank
  • 10.
    Solar
  • 9.
    Dear
  • 8.
    Classic
  • 7.
    soO
  • 6.
    Dark
  • 5.
    ByuN
  • 4.
    TY
  • 3.
    Rogue
  • 2.
    Stats
  • 1.
    INnoVation


?
About the Power Rank



The way our list is put together is through a very simple point assignment system. Each writer decides their own top 10, with more points awarded for higher placement. Points from all contributing writers are then added together and the player with the most points ranks at #1. Very simple—very frustrating for us writers, as it almost always assures our personal rankings will not entirely be reflected in the finished article. We hope to see as much, if not more, debate from you concerning the resulting final placements, or even the whole list if you feel entirely unsatisfied by what we came up with. So let us know just how wrong we are, how biased we are towards Liquid players (???), and why your personal opinion is far more wise than that of our writing collective.

And so, here's this month's list...

10.
Solar

[image loading]


In our last Power Rank, we asked if (Z)Solar was a legitimate contender for the Zerg crown, or if he simply was another pretender, who—though impressive from time to time—was damned to stay second tier for the time being. Unfortunately, he really didn’t do much to answer this question positively, his many opportunities to upgrade his ranking staying unused for the most part.

His sweeping of his Round of 16 group in Code S, with last season’s champion amongst the victims, certainly was a sight to behold and a step into the right direction. His mediocre finish in SSL Premier at rank seven with a 4-5 record, which would send him down to the Fast Lane relegation event next year, signs into the other, direr direction. Additionally, his traditionally strong ZvP match-up took quite a hit last month, with a couple of vicious losses casting doubt over his consistency in this important discipline at a critical point in time—and those doubts confirmed themselves with his loss to sOs in GSL.

Considering his elimination from SSL Premier, only one path remained for Solar to find glory on, but he didn't have the means to force his way through sOs. His quarterfinals elimination in Code S showed why Solar remains overshadowed by his colleagues higher up in the ranking. And even though he sits on a pretty solid number of WCS Points right now, advancing into a higher round of GSL could have given him an important boost in the race to BlizzCon, in which many rivals still exist. The following months are going to be very decisive for Solar in several ways, and his fate is not going to be in his own hands entirely. There comes a point, at which opportunities start to dry up even for a player like Solar, and for now he remains locked in a dissatisfying place.

9.
Dear

[image loading]


The 2017 resurgence of (P)Dear has been subject of many of our articles by now, so naturally it is about time his performances earned him an entrance into the fabled Power Rank. The Protoss’ hot streak in SSL Premier got cut a bit short this last month, but he never looked entirely outclassed in any of these close losses. What is still visible, though, and what has for a long time been a problem of Dear now, is his inability to perform his best in the most important and critical moments. When under high pressure, he caves in and makes mistakes, gets overconfident and maneuvers himself into bad engagements, as recently seen in SSL Premier.

But when he does perform well—and that is the case more often than not these days—, Dear delivers exciting matches and is able to go up against the best of the best on even terms again. His performances over the last months have earned him a spot in the SSL Premier playoffs, his first Korean playoff appearance since 2015. There is no doubt anymore that Dear has the skill to compete on such a level and even make a run deeper into the tournament—maybe even to be a title contender. But for that, he must iron out slight inconsistencies first. If he’s able to do that, he could not only reach for the stars, but also for a higher ranking here.

And for now, that is all Dear can fight for, because even a successful title run in SSL wouldn’t give him enough points to still challenge anyone in the race for BlizzCon. Dear is too far behind the other contenders in the regard. Make no mistake though: The rise of Dear is still ongoing.

8.
Classic

[image loading]


Classic entered August sitting pretty, second in the SSL Premier Standings. He will wrap the month up in the very same place after a string of solid performances cemented his status as the second best Protoss in the world. While Stats may own that throne, wins over aLive, herO and INnoVation were crucial to a successful campaign in which Classic often looked at his authoritative best. They were, however, the brightest points of an otherwise forgettable month. As good as he looked in SSL, his performance in the GSL Round of 16 was certifiably frightful. Unable to even manage a win, he was bumped from the tournament with losses to Dark, who he had lost to earlier in the month in SSL, and Rogue, who ended his run in two weekend tournaments over the past 30 days. His problem match-up, Classic posted a 13-13 record against Zerg during August.

He showed only slightly better results in the other two match-ups, winning 30 games while dropping 21 (9-5 in matches), but the majority of those were in online events and some came against players like Maka and HerO. Classic, a player who has constantly found a way to place highly over the years, has cobbled together another run at a Starleague title despite his inconsistencies over the course of 2017. Ignoring his Ro16 exits in GSL Seasons 1 and 3, a number of unsuccessful qualifying campaigns for weekender events and a poor showing at Gyeonggi way back around the new year have left his BlizzCon status in doubt. Having looked particularly impressive during a 2-0 of INnoVation in the final week of SSL, he has given himself one final chance to reverse that tale. An SSL victory would get him over the threshold required for BlizzCon, but a single win from ByuN would see him toppled from that spot. The next two matches may prove to be the most critical of the year for Classic. And, given that he has reached the Ro4 twice in Anaheim, he has good reason to believe that he can post a solid performance should he get there.

7.
soO

[image loading]


Third time’s apparently not the charm. In some twisted world the silver lining is that soO can’t lose in a seventh GSL finals, but it’s impossible to ask a competitor to accept losing now in order to avoid greater pain later. Pain is a good term to describe soO’s form with. Simply put, he looks anguished in ZvT. Roach aggression, pairing mutalisks or hydralisks with ling bane, hatchery first, pool first, overlord speed, reaching ultralisks and vipers. None of it has worked. soO has played against Terran seven times in August. He fell to GuMiho three times, TY once and KeeN on another occasion. His only victories came in SSL, where he beat jjakji 3-2 in a scrappy affair (one of his three wins versus Terran in nine attempts during July also came against jjakji). The brightest spot has to be his 3-2 victory over ByuN in the losers' bracket final of Master’s Coliseum, though. It’s an encouraging result, but surely one that cannot happen the same way again. That fact was on display in the very next series as GuMiho pulled soO’s more textbook approach every which way with all kinds of harassment, finding ways to do economic when there appeared to be none. For now, soO looks fundamentally flawed in the matchup and it remains a serious roadblock if he wishes to make another finals appearance and possibly break the Kong Curse.

Then how is soO still considered one of the best players in the world? It’s on the back of the other two match-ups. soO played against Protoss or Zerg 15 times in August. He beat Stats as well as Rogue twice and Dark three times. His only losses - Dark and Rogue in GSL and an 0-2 to Italian Zerg Reynor, in a tournament in which the second day of competition conflicted with the final stages of Master’s Coliseum. All in all, he posted a 12-3 record in matches (31-15 in games), proving that while soO is heavily lacking against Terran, he is still the deadliest Zerg against the other two races. Should he shore up his deficiencies in that match-up, he could very well find himself a serious contender for championships again.

6.
Dark

[image loading]


GSL has historically been a treacherous road for Dark, but this season marks the first time he has ever broken through to the quarterfinals. It is perhaps symbolic that a win over soO was the one that launched him over the threshold onto new ground. It’s a run that started in July, the same period in which his SSL campaign began. He’s still alive in both tournaments and seems poised to deliver upon the unfulfilled promise of 2016. It’s not been all sunshine and marshmallows for Dark, however, who, despite defeating soO at the critical juncture, has lost to him three times throughout August and is 10-11 in games and 3-4 in matches against Zerg. Strong wins over Classic and Maru to start the month jumped him out to a 5-2 record in SSL. He limped to the finish line, though, after suffering back to back defeats at Dear and Solar’s hands. He still managed to make the playoffs, where he stares down Dear, a player he lost to a scant few weeks ago. He should be encouraged, though, as he has not dropped a single match vs Protoss since then (3-0 in matches, 7-3 in games) and posted wins over Trap, Classic and Stats back in July.

All of this is compliment to what is quite possibly the best ZvT in the business. Dark is 8-2 in matches against Terran since the beginning of July, (19-12 in games) which includes a pair of wins over INnoVation and Bunny along with victories over Maru, GuMiho and ByuN. No Terran is too much for Dark, who has developed a positively lethal play style that incorporates near perfect spell caster control and late game inevitability with crisply executed all ins and solid macro prowess that allows him to widen leads or close deficits in the mid game. Dark may not cut the same gargantuan figure he did last year, but he’s catching his stride at the perfect time. Dark’s year has been a story of persistence. A pair of IEM top fours have made up for his failings in earlier seasons of GSL and SSL. Now he’s in a position to make real progress there as well. Heading into the final stages of the Korean StarCraft calendar, he’s done enough to assemble a credible bid for BlizzCon, one that should see among the final 16 come November.

5.
ByuN

[image loading]


ByuN is a cursed man. Forever the bearer of crushing fan expectations and a phenomenal second half of 2016, ByuN has struggled to maintain the favor of the masses who anointed him “the best player in the world” less than a year ago. And yet, after a difficult first seven months to 2017, ByuN has begun to turn it around and reverse the storyline of a player who would never recapture his peak form. August has been a banner month for ByuN and undoubtedly his best since his BlizzCon victory. He logged a daunting 40-24 record in games during that stretch (which translated to an impressive 15-6 (71%) mark in matches). He only lost once to Zerg (2-3 to soO in a Master’s Coliseum match in which soO cheesed to win two games), winning encounters against Rogue, Dark and Impact. He dropped a game to Neeb at Shoutcraft, but was otherwise flawless against Protoss, going seven for seven in Bo3 matches against elite competition such as herO, Zest, Stats and Classic.

He continues to display issues in TvT, as evidenced by his loss to Ryung in the Olimoleague monthly finals, but a pair of 3-0’s over GuMiho in online competition and jjakji in SSL should go a ways to dispelling any concerns in that department. All the momentum ByuN has been building could prove meaningless, however, as he faces his sternest test of 2017 to start September. INnoVation is the latest player to inherit the mantle of world’s best, one ByuN held at the turn of the calendar, but ByuN could make strides to reclaiming it with a victory. ByuN made his name through a stretch of play that began around this time last year. A win against INnoVation would also bring him one step closer to duplicating that feat and earning a return trip to BlizzCon. Should he make it, he will know full well that no WCS Champion has ever successfully defended their throne. ByuN has defied the odds on more than one occasion, though, and, should he be in form, he would have every reason to believe he can buck the trend.

4.
TY

[image loading]


TY, perhaps the most notable name to be left off the July Rankings, is making a renewed case that he belongs among the Korean elite. His pair of tournament victories in the first quarter of 2017 were compelling evidence, but he quickly slipped back into his old ways of losing in Round of 8’s, a setting he once more finds himself in as August draws to a close. TY has been a difficult player to get a feel for during 2017. He only played ten matches in July and somehow managed to reduce that count to eight in August. He won the first three of those, but they were not overwhelmingly impressive. Defeating Scarlett, Neeb (3-2) and soO are far from transcendent triumphs. He followed that up by losing his next three matches, a pair of Bo1’s to Kelazhur and Rogue and the dismal showing that was the GSL vs The World final. He bounced back with a pair of 2-0’s in Group D of the GSL Round of 16, but it’s far from enough evidence to brand TY as best in the world.

He does, however, sit firmly atop the second tier having put up gaudy numbers since the start of July (29-9 against players not named Rogue or INnoVation (1-5 against the former, 0-4 against the latter). But it’s not TY’s ability that fans have doubted over the years. Everyone knows he’s an incredibly talented player, but he has a penchant for crumbling when it matters most. WESG and IEM Katowice seem a long way off for the player who's yet to get anywhere close to a third premier title in 2017. GSL provides another shot at that, but Dark will be as difficult a challenge as any TY has faced all year. And if he was unable to defeat soO in Season 1, fresh of his IEM win, how can he expect to get by Dark and reassert himself as the best in the game? It’s really the same story repeated for the umpteenth time. Ability is one thing. Following through is all that matters. But his ability is all we can judge for now, and it earns TY his high spot in the ranking for the time being.

3.
Rogue

[image loading]


Rogue has reached a critical juncture. IEM Shanghai was the crowning achievement on his crusade to reach the zenith as best player in the world. It was a good first step and bought him precious WCS points, but the current Jin Air ace still has a long way to go before cementing himself on such vaunted ground. Unlike his teammates, Rogue has been incredibly active in August. He played in eight different tournaments and played a total of 84 games. He won 53 of them, a 63% win rate, notching a 21-7 mark in matches. He was 31-13 against Protoss during that stretch (an ascendant 11-2 in matches that were Best of 3 or greater) and 5-2 in Best of 3 or greater series against Terrans. He played far less against Zerg in August. In fact, a pair of wins over Serral and Dark during Shoutcraft Kings were the only matches he played against a Zerg not named soO over the past 31 days, who he saw considerably less success against. While he won their meeting in GSL, he lost a pair of Best of 5’s (3-0 in SSL and 3-1 in Master’s Coliseum), a sign that while Rogue is making progress, he still has a long way to go before usurping the Zerg throne. It also cannot be ignored that considering he started the season 19-2 in matches, the 2-5 record since is more than a little troubling.

The problem with meteoric rises is that they inevitably reach an apex. Rogue’s next challenge is to keep things moving in the right direction. He stumbled once more in the quarterfinals of GSL, but looked strong in defeat. His play was crisp in both of his victories as he showed the creative side and execution that make him such a dangerous player. His late charge for BlizzCon seems to have been all but halted, however. He would need a first place finish at the second Super Tournament to even have a chance at cracking the top eight. Too little, too late may be the story of Rogue’s 2017 WCS, but he currently stands as one of the elite in the game and looks poised for a much more successful 2018 should he maintain his excellent form.

2.
Stats

[image loading]


Back in March, Stats was the undisputed best player in the world. As imperious as he looked during a stretch that saw him reach three finals and win one, he was anything but consistent in the months that followed. Things have started to turn around for him with a deep SSL and GSL run, but that doesn’t mean he still isn’t exhibiting flagrant bouts of inconsistency. It may seem unfathomable given Stats' high ranking, but has put up less than spectacular numbers in August. He’s 36-30 during that period, which is surprising, but not as frightening as his 25-27(8-9 in matches) record against Terrans and Zerg. The fact that he was flawless against Protoss (5-0 in matches) over the past 31 days is easily forgotten in the face of his middling results against the other two races. When looked at from that perspective, Stats starts to look every bit the charlatan.

Clutch. It’s not a word fans associated with Stats prior to his GSL victory. He was defined by his shortcomings, not his triumphs. A player who was good, but not great. Amid the mire that is his middling August is the simple fact that Stats wins when it counts. Stats played 33 offline games during August. He won 20. Not convinced? His mark in matches: 7-1. It’s a trend that started months ago. He posted a nearly identical 17-10 record in offline games in July. In matches? An equally impressive 6-2. Somewhere along the way, Stats went from a mild mannered Protoss and second tier KT player, to a Terminator-esque behemoth that makes INnoVation look mortal. It’s a transformation that began more than a year ago, but fans are only getting a glimpse of the optimal configuration. After finishing fourth in the previous season, Stats sits like some megalithic spider in the Grand Finals, waiting for his prey. Meanwhile he’s through to the semifinals in GSL and looks to be the heavy favorite to make a second finals this year and challenge for another GSL title.

1.
INnoVation

[image loading]


INnoVation claimed the top spot in the July Power Rank and, after making nary a misstep in August, he finds himself atop the pack once more. As if his resume wasn’t impressive enough heading into August, he managed to add a seventh Premier event title at GSL vs The World. He did so in dominant fashion, cruising to the finals with a 9-1 record (wins over iAsonu, ByuN and Stats) before finishing the whole thing off with a 4-0 over TY. It was just the beginning of a month that saw him post a 33-15 record in the first fifteen days. Things didn’t go as smoothly from that point on, however. He went 12-14 from August 16th on, ultimately culminating in his loss to Classic and dismissal from SSL Premier. INnoVation’s perceived weakness has always been his TvT, but it’s actually been Protoss that’s been giving him fits lately. He’s an even 19-19 in the matchup (6-7 in matches and only 3-2 in Best of 5’s) during August. He’s 1-3 against Zest and even dropped a match to the lowly Creator during their three encounters.

INnoVation remains a force to be reckoned with in ZvT with a 10-4 record in games (5-1 in matches in August), a predictable result after he went 10-2 in matches against Zerg in July. But this has been marred by his level of competition. Though he has gone 15-3, he has beaten a hapless soO three times, Losira and Leenock twice, a trio of foreigners, and Mamuri, a player not even on the competitive radar. His only quality wins are a pair of 2-1’s over Solar. He has dropped both meetings with Dark, a possible sign that INnoVation’s celebrated reputation in TvZ may be coasting more on reputation than actual results. He has taken steps towards shoring up TvT, though, evidenced by the fact that he has not dropped a match to a player not named GuMiho since late July (8-2 in that period with wins over TY, ByuN and a pair of victories over Maru).

INnoVation ends August on top of the world, but failing to win his first competitive fixture of September could easily spill him from his perch, especially with Stats climbing back up the ladder quickly.

TeamLiquid ESPORTS

Writers: mizenhauer, TheOneAboveU
Editors: Olli
Graphics: shiroiusagi, Olli
Facebook Twitter Reddit
TL+ Member
Phredxor
Profile Joined May 2013
New Zealand15076 Posts
August 31 2017 09:50 GMT
#2
No Zest wow.
Zzzapper
Profile Joined September 2011
1792 Posts
August 31 2017 10:12 GMT
#3
How is Gumi not in this? Sure, his TvZ is atrocious compared to other top terrans but he has the best TvT and arguably TvP right now
Pandemona *
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Charlie Sheens House51466 Posts
August 31 2017 10:15 GMT
#4
Can't believe Classic is so low, guy is a beast. 2-0 Innovation to keep him out of back to back SSL titles as well.
ModeratorTeam Liquid Football Thread Guru! - Chelsea FC ♥
Olli
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
Austria24417 Posts
August 31 2017 10:33 GMT
#5
On August 31 2017 19:15 Pandemona wrote:
Can't believe Classic is so low, guy is a beast. 2-0 Innovation to keep him out of back to back SSL titles as well.


Thank you, the other writers suck and pulled him down
Administrator"Declaring anything a disaster because aLive popped up out of nowhere is just downright silly."
AKAvg
Profile Joined April 2014
Brazil298 Posts
August 31 2017 10:37 GMT
#6
"In some twisted world the silver lining is that soO can’t lose in a seventh GSL finals"

heh.

Poor soO
Pandemona *
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
Charlie Sheens House51466 Posts
August 31 2017 10:39 GMT
#7
On August 31 2017 19:33 Olli wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 31 2017 19:15 Pandemona wrote:
Can't believe Classic is so low, guy is a beast. 2-0 Innovation to keep him out of back to back SSL titles as well.


Thank you, the other writers suck and pulled him down

Yeah i saw should be top 5 at least, guy is beast mode right now.
ModeratorTeam Liquid Football Thread Guru! - Chelsea FC ♥
ghostmaster93
Profile Joined July 2017
155 Posts
August 31 2017 10:47 GMT
#8
On August 31 2017 19:12 Zzzapper wrote:
How is Gumi not in this? Sure, his TvZ is atrocious compared to other top terrans but he has the best TvT and arguably TvP right now


Agree. He's out of GSL, but very close (3-3 result to Innovation). He dominated Master Coliseum with 17-3 results with Buyn, soO, Innovation, Rogue under his hands.
Phredxor
Profile Joined May 2013
New Zealand15076 Posts
August 31 2017 10:50 GMT
#9
If TYs rank is based on his ability why wasn't he ranked anywhere last time?
StarscreamG1
Profile Joined February 2011
Portugal1653 Posts
August 31 2017 10:55 GMT
#10
Usually I agree a lot with the list. Not this time :\
yht9657
Profile Joined December 2016
1810 Posts
August 31 2017 11:06 GMT
#11
Mostly a very reasonable list, but Soo seems an arguable case since he is not having any considerable result since last GSL and he looks hopeless against terran.
DubiousC2
Profile Joined June 2016
129 Posts
August 31 2017 11:15 GMT
#12
Stats should rank above Innovation. Also, I think the Rouge hype-train is unjustified.

Other than that, great power rank.
Manner MULE /dance
Olli
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
Austria24417 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-31 11:19:58
August 31 2017 11:19 GMT
#13
On August 31 2017 19:50 Phredxor wrote:
If TYs rank is based on his ability why wasn't he ranked anywhere last time?


We saw next to nothing of him before the latest ranking.
Administrator"Declaring anything a disaster because aLive popped up out of nowhere is just downright silly."
Zzzapper
Profile Joined September 2011
1792 Posts
August 31 2017 11:34 GMT
#14
On August 31 2017 20:19 Olli wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 31 2017 19:50 Phredxor wrote:
If TYs rank is based on his ability why wasn't he ranked anywhere last time?


We saw next to nothing of him before the latest ranking.

He played more games last month than this month
Charoisaur
Profile Joined August 2014
Germany15911 Posts
August 31 2017 11:34 GMT
#15
Surprisingly I agree with most of the power rank except obviously ByuN being too high once again.
Many of the coolest moments in sc2 happen due to worker harassment
Argonauta
Profile Joined July 2016
Spain4903 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-31 11:40:31
August 31 2017 11:40 GMT
#16
I dont thing Rogue Hype Train is that unjustified, the guy is the best and most rounded Z atm and really solid overall... but yeah not performing well in the SuperTounament should put him few positions back. Stats should be first tho and BuyN is too high.
Rogue | Maru | Scarlett | Trap
TL+ Member
Ej_
Profile Blog Joined January 2013
47656 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-31 11:41:55
August 31 2017 11:40 GMT
#17
You can tell mizenhauer wrote the introduction paragraph, because it's passive aggressive.

e: Dark and Dear too low, Rogue too high. Who tf placed Rogue highly enough to boost him to #3 :<?
"Technically the dictionary has zero authority on the meaning or words" - Rodya
sneakyfox
Profile Joined January 2017
8216 Posts
August 31 2017 11:45 GMT
#18
Just realized why these rankings are so odd. You guys count online games as much as offline games. Makes no sense.
"I saw what sneakyfox wrote on TL.net and it made me furious" - PartinG
Mahanaim
Profile Joined December 2012
Korea (South)1002 Posts
August 31 2017 11:49 GMT
#19
Inno #1, me happy :D
Celebrating Starcraft since... a long time ago.
TheOneAboveU
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Germany3367 Posts
August 31 2017 11:51 GMT
#20
On August 31 2017 20:45 sneakyfox wrote:
Just realized why these rankings are so odd. You guys count online games as much as offline games. Makes no sense.


I personally don't value them equally. But as stated in the introduction, this ranking is the result of putting the rankings of multiple writers together. Since we're not a hivemind, we may value certain aspects differently than our colleagues.

Also I ranked Classic on the same position as Olli, so I plead innocent on that point.
Moderatoralias TripleM | @TL_TripleM | Big Dark Energy!
Mizenhauer
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
United States1824 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-31 12:06:19
August 31 2017 12:03 GMT
#21
On August 31 2017 20:40 Ej_ wrote:
You can tell mizenhauer wrote the introduction paragraph, because it's passive aggressive.

e: Dark and Dear too low, Rogue too high. Who tf placed Rogue highly enough to boost him to #3 :<?


I didn't write the intro....

But if you can guess which PR's I wrote I'll find it in my heart to forgive you for such slander.
┗|∵|┓Second Place in LB 28, Third Place in LB 29 and Destined to Be a Kong
Charoisaur
Profile Joined August 2014
Germany15911 Posts
August 31 2017 12:15 GMT
#22
On August 31 2017 20:45 sneakyfox wrote:
Just realized why these rankings are so odd. You guys count online games as much as offline games. Makes no sense.

I don't think so considering Gumiho isn't on the list.
Many of the coolest moments in sc2 happen due to worker harassment
Durnuu
Profile Joined September 2013
13319 Posts
August 31 2017 12:25 GMT
#23
There is something wrong with this PR
where is the liquidbias ?
BUNNYYYYYYYYY https://i.imgur.com/BiCF577.png
207aicila
Profile Joined January 2015
1237 Posts
August 31 2017 12:40 GMT
#24
On August 31 2017 20:45 sneakyfox wrote:
Just realized why these rankings are so odd. You guys count online games as much as offline games. Makes no sense.


If that were true GuMiHo would be top 3.
mfw people who never followed BW speak about sAviOr as if they know anything... -___-''''
TL+ Member
Nerchio
Profile Joined October 2009
Poland2633 Posts
August 31 2017 13:08 GMT
#25
wer is wcs
Progamer"I am the best" - Nerchio , 2017.
Mizenhauer
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
United States1824 Posts
August 31 2017 13:13 GMT
#26
On August 31 2017 22:08 Nerchio wrote:
wer is wcs


Stay tuned!
┗|∵|┓Second Place in LB 28, Third Place in LB 29 and Destined to Be a Kong
Sakat
Profile Blog Joined October 2014
Croatia1599 Posts
August 31 2017 13:21 GMT
#27
On August 31 2017 22:08 Nerchio wrote:
wer is wcs

It's right here... the gap is closing as seen by this power rank
My boy Ptak defeated two GSL champions!
The_Red_Viper
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
19533 Posts
August 31 2017 13:47 GMT
#28
I actually think Stats deserves the number one spot this time, Inno kinda disappointing in SSL.


Something i think you should do though is giving us the direction of players since last PR.
Kinda like this or this

Thanks for doing these again though
IU | Sohyang || There is no God and we are his prophets | For if ‘Thou mayest’—it is also true that ‘Thou mayest not.” | Ignorance is the parent of fear |
Cricketer12
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
United States13972 Posts
August 31 2017 13:56 GMT
#29
On August 31 2017 22:21 Sakat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 31 2017 22:08 Nerchio wrote:
wer is wcs

It's right here... the gap is closing as seen by this power rank

Oh I see it
Kaina + Drones Linkcro Summon Cupsie Yummy Way
MarianoSC2
Profile Joined June 2015
Slovakia1855 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-31 14:21:45
August 31 2017 14:19 GMT
#30
Good list, thanks. Mine would be:
1. Stats 2. Inno 3. Rogue 4.Classic 5.TY 6.Dark 7.Gumiho 8.Dear 9.Byun 10.Solar
Top 11: Rogue, Maru, Inno, Zest, Life, sOs, Stats, Dark, soO, Mvp, Classic/Trap/MC/Rain
Inflicted
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Australia18228 Posts
August 31 2017 14:20 GMT
#31
Nice copy paste div ids "partingvslife" "maruvssoulkey' "grandfinals"
Liquipedia"Expert"
Fango
Profile Joined July 2016
United Kingdom8987 Posts
August 31 2017 14:52 GMT
#32
On August 31 2017 20:19 Olli wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 31 2017 19:50 Phredxor wrote:
If TYs rank is based on his ability why wasn't he ranked anywhere last time?


We saw next to nothing of him before the latest ranking.


Didn't he get IEM ro4 right before?
Zest, sOs, PartinG, Dark, and Maru are the real champs. ROOT_herO is overrated. Snute, Serral, and Scarlett are the foreigner GOATs
highsis
Profile Joined August 2011
259 Posts
August 31 2017 15:47 GMT
#33
Zest played 8 practices matches against Rogue and went 7-1 a week ago.

Someone who is sitting at the top of the Korean GM should have a place in the rank IMO.
Ej_
Profile Blog Joined January 2013
47656 Posts
August 31 2017 15:52 GMT
#34
On September 01 2017 00:47 highsis wrote:
Zest played 8 practices matches against Rogue and went 7-1 a week ago.

Someone who is sitting at the top of the Korean GM should have a place in the rank IMO.

Zest is also Code B so worse than NoRegret in actual starleagues
"Technically the dictionary has zero authority on the meaning or words" - Rodya
Blargh
Profile Joined September 2010
United States2101 Posts
August 31 2017 15:56 GMT
#35
Innovation might be too high. Gumiho is absent which is laughable.
sneakyfox
Profile Joined January 2017
8216 Posts
August 31 2017 16:00 GMT
#36
On August 31 2017 21:15 Charoisaur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 31 2017 20:45 sneakyfox wrote:
Just realized why these rankings are so odd. You guys count online games as much as offline games. Makes no sense.

I don't think so considering Gumiho isn't on the list.


Well ok, I give up
"I saw what sneakyfox wrote on TL.net and it made me furious" - PartinG
The_Red_Viper
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
19533 Posts
August 31 2017 16:00 GMT
#37
I don't understand why people mention gumiho here, what exactly did he do this month?
I think it's a good decision to only really value offline results here, all these small online cups are nice but nobody will remember these results at the end of the day.
So if you want Gumiho on the list, who gets cut instead?
IU | Sohyang || There is no God and we are his prophets | For if ‘Thou mayest’—it is also true that ‘Thou mayest not.” | Ignorance is the parent of fear |
Cricketer12
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
United States13972 Posts
August 31 2017 16:02 GMT
#38
On September 01 2017 01:00 The_Red_Viper wrote:
I don't understand why people mention gumiho here, what exactly did he do this month?
I think it's a good decision to only really value offline results here, all these small online cups are nice but nobody will remember these results at the end of the day.
So if you want Gumiho on the list, who gets cut instead?

Priorities. Let's talk about how Taeja and Zest aren't 1 and 2.
Kaina + Drones Linkcro Summon Cupsie Yummy Way
ruypture
Profile Joined May 2014
United States367 Posts
August 31 2017 16:11 GMT
#39
I think its pretty cool how many people could have contended for 6-10 right now. Surprised that gumiho didnt make it over solar but solar has obviously performed better this season of gsl, but gumi's last season was better.

still waiting on the nth coming of Zest
어윤수|이신형|이재동|이승형
ruypture
Profile Joined May 2014
United States367 Posts
August 31 2017 16:12 GMT
#40
On September 01 2017 00:47 highsis wrote:
Zest played 8 practices matches against Rogue and went 7-1 a week ago.

Someone who is sitting at the top of the Korean GM should have a place in the rank IMO.


I don't think ladder rankings should ever be considered in a top player ranking
어윤수|이신형|이재동|이승형
hexhaven
Profile Joined July 2014
Finland929 Posts
August 31 2017 18:15 GMT
#41
On August 31 2017 20:51 TheOneAboveU wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 31 2017 20:45 sneakyfox wrote:
Just realized why these rankings are so odd. You guys count online games as much as offline games. Makes no sense.


I personally don't value them equally. But as stated in the introduction, this ranking is the result of putting the rankings of multiple writers together. Since we're not a hivemind, we may value certain aspects differently than our colleagues.

Also I ranked Classic on the same position as Olli, so I plead innocent on that point.


This way no one is really happy with the results, so it's absolutely the best way to do things.
WriterI shoot events. | http://www.jussi.co/esports
Phredxor
Profile Joined May 2013
New Zealand15076 Posts
August 31 2017 18:51 GMT
#42
On August 31 2017 23:52 Fango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 31 2017 20:19 Olli wrote:
On August 31 2017 19:50 Phredxor wrote:
If TYs rank is based on his ability why wasn't he ranked anywhere last time?


We saw next to nothing of him before the latest ranking.


Didn't he get IEM ro4 right before?


He did. That's why i don't get it.
pvsnp
Profile Joined January 2017
7676 Posts
August 31 2017 18:59 GMT
#43
It's getting to that time of year, when players ramp up their end-year preparations. The champions of GSL and SSL will obviously be big favorites going into Blizzcon.

Speaking of Blizzcon, I think the WCS-points math means that only ByuN and herO out of the current Top 8 are in danger of missing Blizzcon?
Denominator of the Universe
TL+ Member
Fango
Profile Joined July 2016
United Kingdom8987 Posts
August 31 2017 19:07 GMT
#44
On September 01 2017 01:12 ruypture wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 01 2017 00:47 highsis wrote:
Zest played 8 practices matches against Rogue and went 7-1 a week ago.

Someone who is sitting at the top of the Korean GM should have a place in the rank IMO.


I don't think ladder rankings should ever be considered in a top player ranking


In my opinion a power rank should basically mean "if everyone played in a tournament right today, who's most likely to win".

If someone is seriously (and I mean seriously) killing it online, they probably have a good chance at doing well offline. For example, disregarding online/ladder performances means that ByuN and Rogue would never have made it into a top 10 PR right before their big tournament wins. Looking back, we know that they proved to be some of the best players during those times. And their success online should have been an indicator

Doing poorly online doesn't necessarily indicate a player is in bad form (e.g TY). However if you're crushing Inno, soO, ByuN etc on a daily bases, that can at least suggest you're in good shape
Zest, sOs, PartinG, Dark, and Maru are the real champs. ROOT_herO is overrated. Snute, Serral, and Scarlett are the foreigner GOATs
Cricketer12
Profile Blog Joined May 2012
United States13972 Posts
August 31 2017 19:13 GMT
#45
On September 01 2017 04:07 Fango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 01 2017 01:12 ruypture wrote:
On September 01 2017 00:47 highsis wrote:
Zest played 8 practices matches against Rogue and went 7-1 a week ago.

Someone who is sitting at the top of the Korean GM should have a place in the rank IMO.


I don't think ladder rankings should ever be considered in a top player ranking


In my opinion a power rank should basically mean "if everyone played in a tournament right today, who's most likely to win".

If someone is seriously (and I mean seriously) killing it online, they probably have a good chance at doing well offline. For example, disregarding online/ladder performances means that ByuN and Rogue would never have made it into a top 10 PR right before their big tournament wins. Looking back, we know that they proved to be some of the best players during those times. And their success online should have been an indicator

Doing poorly online doesn't necessarily indicate a player is in bad form (e.g TY). However if you're crushing Inno, soO, ByuN etc on a daily bases, that can at least suggest you're in good shape

Ladder has no value. No one cares if they lose a ladder match or online tourney. They care about starleagues.
Kaina + Drones Linkcro Summon Cupsie Yummy Way
Fango
Profile Joined July 2016
United Kingdom8987 Posts
August 31 2017 19:16 GMT
#46
On September 01 2017 03:59 pvsnp wrote:Speaking of Blizzcon, I think the WCS-points math means that only ByuN and herO out of the current Top 8 are in danger of missing Blizzcon?


Mathematically speaking, Dark, herO, and ByuN can still fall out.

Dark is garanteed a place if sOs doesn't make the GSL final as well. Unless the GSL final is sOs vs ByuN again, the odds of Dark getting knocked out are very slim
Zest, sOs, PartinG, Dark, and Maru are the real champs. ROOT_herO is overrated. Snute, Serral, and Scarlett are the foreigner GOATs
DSh1
Profile Joined April 2017
292 Posts
August 31 2017 19:18 GMT
#47
On September 01 2017 04:13 Cricketer12 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 01 2017 04:07 Fango wrote:
On September 01 2017 01:12 ruypture wrote:
On September 01 2017 00:47 highsis wrote:
Zest played 8 practices matches against Rogue and went 7-1 a week ago.

Someone who is sitting at the top of the Korean GM should have a place in the rank IMO.


I don't think ladder rankings should ever be considered in a top player ranking


In my opinion a power rank should basically mean "if everyone played in a tournament right today, who's most likely to win".

If someone is seriously (and I mean seriously) killing it online, they probably have a good chance at doing well offline. For example, disregarding online/ladder performances means that ByuN and Rogue would never have made it into a top 10 PR right before their big tournament wins. Looking back, we know that they proved to be some of the best players during those times. And their success online should have been an indicator

Doing poorly online doesn't necessarily indicate a player is in bad form (e.g TY). However if you're crushing Inno, soO, ByuN etc on a daily bases, that can at least suggest you're in good shape

Ladder has no value. No one cares if they lose a ladder match or online tourney. They care about starleagues.


It's about correlation. If you are good offline, you have to be somewhat decent on ladder. So someone does care.
Fango
Profile Joined July 2016
United Kingdom8987 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-31 19:26:26
August 31 2017 19:24 GMT
#48
On September 01 2017 04:13 Cricketer12 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 01 2017 04:07 Fango wrote:
On September 01 2017 01:12 ruypture wrote:
On September 01 2017 00:47 highsis wrote:
Zest played 8 practices matches against Rogue and went 7-1 a week ago.

Someone who is sitting at the top of the Korean GM should have a place in the rank IMO.


I don't think ladder rankings should ever be considered in a top player ranking


In my opinion a power rank should basically mean "if everyone played in a tournament right today, who's most likely to win".

If someone is seriously (and I mean seriously) killing it online, they probably have a good chance at doing well offline. For example, disregarding online/ladder performances means that ByuN and Rogue would never have made it into a top 10 PR right before their big tournament wins. Looking back, we know that they proved to be some of the best players during those times. And their success online should have been an indicator

Doing poorly online doesn't necessarily indicate a player is in bad form (e.g TY). However if you're crushing Inno, soO, ByuN etc on a daily bases, that can at least suggest you're in good shape

Ladder has no value. No one cares if they lose a ladder match or online tourney. They care about starleagues.


And guess what....if you want to win a starleague, you have to spend all day practicing. For many players nowadays, this comes in the form of laddering. You're seriously telling me that beating Inno, Rogue, soO, ByuN, Zest etc (all the ladder kings) on a daily bases doesn't indicate a player is doing good??

That attitude is why no one thought ByuN had a chance in GSL last year even though he was number 1 online, and then he won. Remember when Neeb eventually reached the top level of the korean ladder after moving there? And then he won kespa cup. People even kept doubting Rogue recently, saying ladder performance doesn't carry over to offline, and then he won IEM.

I never said that being no.1 on ladder means the same as any decent offline result. I said it's an indicator that a player is doing well. Many players have shown this to be true. soO, Rogue, ByuN, Neeb etc
Zest, sOs, PartinG, Dark, and Maru are the real champs. ROOT_herO is overrated. Snute, Serral, and Scarlett are the foreigner GOATs
207aicila
Profile Joined January 2015
1237 Posts
August 31 2017 20:03 GMT
#49
On September 01 2017 04:24 Fango wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 01 2017 04:13 Cricketer12 wrote:
On September 01 2017 04:07 Fango wrote:
On September 01 2017 01:12 ruypture wrote:
On September 01 2017 00:47 highsis wrote:
Zest played 8 practices matches against Rogue and went 7-1 a week ago.

Someone who is sitting at the top of the Korean GM should have a place in the rank IMO.


I don't think ladder rankings should ever be considered in a top player ranking


In my opinion a power rank should basically mean "if everyone played in a tournament right today, who's most likely to win".

If someone is seriously (and I mean seriously) killing it online, they probably have a good chance at doing well offline. For example, disregarding online/ladder performances means that ByuN and Rogue would never have made it into a top 10 PR right before their big tournament wins. Looking back, we know that they proved to be some of the best players during those times. And their success online should have been an indicator

Doing poorly online doesn't necessarily indicate a player is in bad form (e.g TY). However if you're crushing Inno, soO, ByuN etc on a daily bases, that can at least suggest you're in good shape

Ladder has no value. No one cares if they lose a ladder match or online tourney. They care about starleagues.


And guess what....if you want to win a starleague, you have to spend all day practicing. For many players nowadays, this comes in the form of laddering. You're seriously telling me that beating Inno, Rogue, soO, ByuN, Zest etc (all the ladder kings) on a daily bases doesn't indicate a player is doing good??

That attitude is why no one thought ByuN had a chance in GSL last year even though he was number 1 online, and then he won. Remember when Neeb eventually reached the top level of the korean ladder after moving there? And then he won kespa cup. People even kept doubting Rogue recently, saying ladder performance doesn't carry over to offline, and then he won IEM.

I never said that being no.1 on ladder means the same as any decent offline result. I said it's an indicator that a player is doing well. Many players have shown this to be true. soO, Rogue, ByuN, Neeb etc


Yeah... still it's a lot of conjecture one way or the other. We have a lot of cases where this translated into wins, and just as many where it didn't, or at the very least it took a long time. Even ByuN falls into the latter, where he was mopping the floor with online tournies for a long long time before he finally made his big LAN comeback (not just comeback but career peak).

I'm mostly on the side that at least online tournies should count somewhat, but it's hard to ignore how many examples we've had in the past of players who despite doing very well online either never managed to achieve a breakthrough performance at a high profile LAN, or took a lot longer than we expected them to (months, even years).

mfw people who never followed BW speak about sAviOr as if they know anything... -___-''''
TL+ Member
curufinwe_wins
Profile Joined August 2017
68 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-31 20:11:59
August 31 2017 20:09 GMT
#50
Honestly.... I think Rogue / Stats / Innovation is a good top 3 for sure. I'm not so sold right now in the order of them though.

Before Rogue hit Stats today, he's looked basically unbeatable in PvZ but much more "meh" in PvT. Stats is showing true dominance (offline) against everyone not named Innovation, and Inno was much weaker in TvP than expected this SSL round.

I'd probably be ok saying Rogue<Stats=Inno, but the long number of sweeps of Stats Inno has managed to pull out is hard to make the argument that Inno wouldn't win a h2h.
pvsnp
Profile Joined January 2017
7676 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-08-31 20:25:41
August 31 2017 20:17 GMT
#51
On September 01 2017 05:09 curufinwe_wins wrote:
Honestly.... I think Rogue / Stats / Innovation is a good top 3 for sure. I'm not so sold right now in the order of them though.

Before Rogue hit Stats today, he's looked basically unbeatable in PvZ but much more "meh" in PvT. Stats is showing true dominance against everyone not named Innovation, and Inno was much weaker in TvP than expected this SSL round.

I'd probably be ok saying Rogue<Stats=Inno, but the long number of sweeps of Stats Inno has managed to pull out is hard to make the argument that Inno wouldn't win a h2h.

The rivalry of Inno and Stats has had a pretty significant impact on Korean tournaments ever since Blizzcon 2016.

IEM Gyeonggi: Inno 4-0 Stats in Finals, takes trophy
GSL Season 1: Stats 3-2 Inno in Ro8, later takes trophy
SSL Season 1: Inno 2-0 Stats in RR, later takes trophy
GSL vs the World: Inno 3-0 Stats in Ro4, later takes trophy
Currently, Stats is in the SSL Season 2 finals after beating Inno 2-0 during the RR. Stats vs Inno could also be the GSL finals.

Head-to-head they are very close, with Inno holding a slight lead. In 2017, Stats has been more consistent but Inno has more trophies. Either one would have a good case for being the best player of 2017.

Some of those Inno vs Stats series were really onesided though.
Denominator of the Universe
TL+ Member
Charoisaur
Profile Joined August 2014
Germany15911 Posts
August 31 2017 20:28 GMT
#52
On September 01 2017 05:03 207aicila wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 01 2017 04:24 Fango wrote:
On September 01 2017 04:13 Cricketer12 wrote:
On September 01 2017 04:07 Fango wrote:
On September 01 2017 01:12 ruypture wrote:
On September 01 2017 00:47 highsis wrote:
Zest played 8 practices matches against Rogue and went 7-1 a week ago.

Someone who is sitting at the top of the Korean GM should have a place in the rank IMO.


I don't think ladder rankings should ever be considered in a top player ranking


In my opinion a power rank should basically mean "if everyone played in a tournament right today, who's most likely to win".

If someone is seriously (and I mean seriously) killing it online, they probably have a good chance at doing well offline. For example, disregarding online/ladder performances means that ByuN and Rogue would never have made it into a top 10 PR right before their big tournament wins. Looking back, we know that they proved to be some of the best players during those times. And their success online should have been an indicator

Doing poorly online doesn't necessarily indicate a player is in bad form (e.g TY). However if you're crushing Inno, soO, ByuN etc on a daily bases, that can at least suggest you're in good shape

Ladder has no value. No one cares if they lose a ladder match or online tourney. They care about starleagues.


And guess what....if you want to win a starleague, you have to spend all day practicing. For many players nowadays, this comes in the form of laddering. You're seriously telling me that beating Inno, Rogue, soO, ByuN, Zest etc (all the ladder kings) on a daily bases doesn't indicate a player is doing good??

That attitude is why no one thought ByuN had a chance in GSL last year even though he was number 1 online, and then he won. Remember when Neeb eventually reached the top level of the korean ladder after moving there? And then he won kespa cup. People even kept doubting Rogue recently, saying ladder performance doesn't carry over to offline, and then he won IEM.

I never said that being no.1 on ladder means the same as any decent offline result. I said it's an indicator that a player is doing well. Many players have shown this to be true. soO, Rogue, ByuN, Neeb etc


Yeah... still it's a lot of conjecture one way or the other. We have a lot of cases where this translated into wins, and just as many where it didn't, or at the very least it took a long time. Even ByuN falls into the latter, where he was mopping the floor with online tournies for a long long time before he finally made his big LAN comeback (not just comeback but career peak).

I'm mostly on the side that at least online tournies should count somewhat, but it's hard to ignore how many examples we've had in the past of players who despite doing very well online either never managed to achieve a breakthrough performance at a high profile LAN, or took a lot longer than we expected them to (months, even years).


Well if two players are looking similarly strong in tournaments and one is crushing the ladder while the other is not, I'd clearly favor the one who is crushing ladder. It doesn't outweigh tournament results but it surely has some value.
Many of the coolest moments in sc2 happen due to worker harassment
curufinwe_wins
Profile Joined August 2017
68 Posts
August 31 2017 21:10 GMT
#53
On September 01 2017 05:17 pvsnp wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 01 2017 05:09 curufinwe_wins wrote:
Honestly.... I think Rogue / Stats / Innovation is a good top 3 for sure. I'm not so sold right now in the order of them though.

Before Rogue hit Stats today, he's looked basically unbeatable in PvZ but much more "meh" in PvT. Stats is showing true dominance against everyone not named Innovation, and Inno was much weaker in TvP than expected this SSL round.

I'd probably be ok saying Rogue<Stats=Inno, but the long number of sweeps of Stats Inno has managed to pull out is hard to make the argument that Inno wouldn't win a h2h.

The rivalry of Inno and Stats has had a pretty significant impact on Korean tournaments ever since Blizzcon 2016.

IEM Gyeonggi: Inno 4-0 Stats in Finals, takes trophy
GSL Season 1: Stats 3-2 Inno in Ro8, later takes trophy
SSL Season 1: Inno 2-0 Stats in RR, later takes trophy
GSL vs the World: Inno 3-0 Stats in Ro4, later takes trophy
Currently, Stats is in the SSL Season 2 finals after beating Inno 2-0 during the RR. Stats vs Inno could also be the GSL finals.

Head-to-head they are very close, with Inno holding a slight lead. In 2017, Stats has been more consistent but Inno has more trophies. Either one would have a good case for being the best player of 2017.

Some of those Inno vs Stats series were really onesided though.


EXTREMELY one sided.... but yeah. I'd agree.
207aicila
Profile Joined January 2015
1237 Posts
August 31 2017 22:13 GMT
#54
On September 01 2017 05:28 Charoisaur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 01 2017 05:03 207aicila wrote:
On September 01 2017 04:24 Fango wrote:
On September 01 2017 04:13 Cricketer12 wrote:
On September 01 2017 04:07 Fango wrote:
On September 01 2017 01:12 ruypture wrote:
On September 01 2017 00:47 highsis wrote:
Zest played 8 practices matches against Rogue and went 7-1 a week ago.

Someone who is sitting at the top of the Korean GM should have a place in the rank IMO.


I don't think ladder rankings should ever be considered in a top player ranking


In my opinion a power rank should basically mean "if everyone played in a tournament right today, who's most likely to win".

If someone is seriously (and I mean seriously) killing it online, they probably have a good chance at doing well offline. For example, disregarding online/ladder performances means that ByuN and Rogue would never have made it into a top 10 PR right before their big tournament wins. Looking back, we know that they proved to be some of the best players during those times. And their success online should have been an indicator

Doing poorly online doesn't necessarily indicate a player is in bad form (e.g TY). However if you're crushing Inno, soO, ByuN etc on a daily bases, that can at least suggest you're in good shape

Ladder has no value. No one cares if they lose a ladder match or online tourney. They care about starleagues.


And guess what....if you want to win a starleague, you have to spend all day practicing. For many players nowadays, this comes in the form of laddering. You're seriously telling me that beating Inno, Rogue, soO, ByuN, Zest etc (all the ladder kings) on a daily bases doesn't indicate a player is doing good??

That attitude is why no one thought ByuN had a chance in GSL last year even though he was number 1 online, and then he won. Remember when Neeb eventually reached the top level of the korean ladder after moving there? And then he won kespa cup. People even kept doubting Rogue recently, saying ladder performance doesn't carry over to offline, and then he won IEM.

I never said that being no.1 on ladder means the same as any decent offline result. I said it's an indicator that a player is doing well. Many players have shown this to be true. soO, Rogue, ByuN, Neeb etc


Yeah... still it's a lot of conjecture one way or the other. We have a lot of cases where this translated into wins, and just as many where it didn't, or at the very least it took a long time. Even ByuN falls into the latter, where he was mopping the floor with online tournies for a long long time before he finally made his big LAN comeback (not just comeback but career peak).

I'm mostly on the side that at least online tournies should count somewhat, but it's hard to ignore how many examples we've had in the past of players who despite doing very well online either never managed to achieve a breakthrough performance at a high profile LAN, or took a lot longer than we expected them to (months, even years).


Well if two players are looking similarly strong in tournaments and one is crushing the ladder while the other is not, I'd clearly favor the one who is crushing ladder. It doesn't outweigh tournament results but it surely has some value.


In that situation sure, 100% agreed.
mfw people who never followed BW speak about sAviOr as if they know anything... -___-''''
TL+ Member
The_Red_Viper
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
19533 Posts
August 31 2017 22:35 GMT
#55
On September 01 2017 05:28 Charoisaur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 01 2017 05:03 207aicila wrote:
On September 01 2017 04:24 Fango wrote:
On September 01 2017 04:13 Cricketer12 wrote:
On September 01 2017 04:07 Fango wrote:
On September 01 2017 01:12 ruypture wrote:
On September 01 2017 00:47 highsis wrote:
Zest played 8 practices matches against Rogue and went 7-1 a week ago.

Someone who is sitting at the top of the Korean GM should have a place in the rank IMO.


I don't think ladder rankings should ever be considered in a top player ranking


In my opinion a power rank should basically mean "if everyone played in a tournament right today, who's most likely to win".

If someone is seriously (and I mean seriously) killing it online, they probably have a good chance at doing well offline. For example, disregarding online/ladder performances means that ByuN and Rogue would never have made it into a top 10 PR right before their big tournament wins. Looking back, we know that they proved to be some of the best players during those times. And their success online should have been an indicator

Doing poorly online doesn't necessarily indicate a player is in bad form (e.g TY). However if you're crushing Inno, soO, ByuN etc on a daily bases, that can at least suggest you're in good shape

Ladder has no value. No one cares if they lose a ladder match or online tourney. They care about starleagues.


And guess what....if you want to win a starleague, you have to spend all day practicing. For many players nowadays, this comes in the form of laddering. You're seriously telling me that beating Inno, Rogue, soO, ByuN, Zest etc (all the ladder kings) on a daily bases doesn't indicate a player is doing good??

That attitude is why no one thought ByuN had a chance in GSL last year even though he was number 1 online, and then he won. Remember when Neeb eventually reached the top level of the korean ladder after moving there? And then he won kespa cup. People even kept doubting Rogue recently, saying ladder performance doesn't carry over to offline, and then he won IEM.

I never said that being no.1 on ladder means the same as any decent offline result. I said it's an indicator that a player is doing well. Many players have shown this to be true. soO, Rogue, ByuN, Neeb etc


Yeah... still it's a lot of conjecture one way or the other. We have a lot of cases where this translated into wins, and just as many where it didn't, or at the very least it took a long time. Even ByuN falls into the latter, where he was mopping the floor with online tournies for a long long time before he finally made his big LAN comeback (not just comeback but career peak).

I'm mostly on the side that at least online tournies should count somewhat, but it's hard to ignore how many examples we've had in the past of players who despite doing very well online either never managed to achieve a breakthrough performance at a high profile LAN, or took a lot longer than we expected them to (months, even years).


Well if two players are looking similarly strong in tournaments and one is crushing the ladder while the other is not, I'd clearly favor the one who is crushing ladder. It doesn't outweigh tournament results but it surely has some value.

Nah ladder can show that someone has the potential to play well in tournaments, but if he doesn't do that then there is no point in valuign ladder at all. Tournament results matter, everybody wants to win tournaments. Not everybody wants to grind ladder to be first. Ladder placement is meaningless in judging a player.
IU | Sohyang || There is no God and we are his prophets | For if ‘Thou mayest’—it is also true that ‘Thou mayest not.” | Ignorance is the parent of fear |
Shellshock
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States97276 Posts
September 01 2017 02:36 GMT
#56
CLASSIC SHOULD BE #1
Moderatorhttp://i.imgur.com/U4xwqmD.png
TL+ Member
Kaizor
Profile Joined May 2015
Singapore909 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-01 15:09:19
September 01 2017 15:08 GMT
#57
I am a Byun fan but even i think he is ranked way too high in this ranking.

He's more like a 7th-8th for me.

Hit me up if you need chinese translations. soO fighting !!
The_Red_Viper
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
19533 Posts
September 01 2017 15:43 GMT
#58
Any comment on the possibility to add indicators for the ranking? Would be useful to see where the players ranked the edition before.
IU | Sohyang || There is no God and we are his prophets | For if ‘Thou mayest’—it is also true that ‘Thou mayest not.” | Ignorance is the parent of fear |
Sakat
Profile Blog Joined October 2014
Croatia1599 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-01 16:33:01
September 01 2017 16:08 GMT
#59
On September 02 2017 00:43 The_Red_Viper wrote:
Any comment on the possibility to add indicators for the ranking? Would be useful to see where the players ranked the edition before.

Community power rank = best power rank

Edit: I also object to the apparent lack of Zest in this PR because anything Stats can do, Zest can do better
My boy Ptak defeated two GSL champions!
The_Red_Viper
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
19533 Posts
September 01 2017 16:57 GMT
#60
On September 02 2017 01:08 Sakat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2017 00:43 The_Red_Viper wrote:
Any comment on the possibility to add indicators for the ranking? Would be useful to see where the players ranked the edition before.

Community power rank = best power rank

Edit: I also object to the apparent lack of Zest in this PR because anything Stats can do, Zest can do better

Not sure if i will keep doing those now that the official ones are back, depends if people enjoyed it or not i guess
IU | Sohyang || There is no God and we are his prophets | For if ‘Thou mayest’—it is also true that ‘Thou mayest not.” | Ignorance is the parent of fear |
Jealous
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
10111 Posts
September 01 2017 22:27 GMT
#61
Would it be possible to include "SC2" or "BW" in future iterations of such posts? I couldn't tell which it was for when I saw it on the front page (the SC2 icon on the top left is tiny af and the "II" that I think I see under it, too dark).
"The right to vote is only the oar of the slaveship, I wanna be free." -- бум бум сучка!
KR_4EVR
Profile Joined July 2017
316 Posts
September 02 2017 00:54 GMT
#62
On August 32 2017 11:36 She||zhock wrote:
$O$ SHOULD BE #1


I agree 100%. However, metric rankings do not favor the inconsistently brilliant.

Rogue --- will not be on this list next month.

ogue looked mentally broken and falling apart in the match vs. Stats on Acolyte in the GSL S3 round of 8. I don't know why but he kept refusing to place another spore along the warp prism path that was used like 10x in a row... and then his main got sniped and from there his EPM went down some 85%. He won on army composition in the end, but it was like the guy just had a mental breakdown that delayed the victory by half an hour.
Et tu Brute ?
KR_4EVR
Profile Joined July 2017
316 Posts
September 02 2017 00:58 GMT
#63
On September 02 2017 09:54 KR_4EVR wrote:
I'm not really sure that
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2017 09:54 KR_4EVR wrote:
I'm not really sure that
On September 02 2017 09:54 KR_4EVR wrote:
I'm not really sure that
On September 02 2017 09:55 KR_4EVR wrote:
I'm not really sure that
On September 02 2017 09:55 KR_4EVR wrote:
I'm not really sure that
On September 02 2017 09:54 KR_4EVR wrote:
I'm not really sure that
On September 02 2017 09:56 KR_4EVR wrote:
I'm not really sure that
On September 02 2017 09:56 KR_4EVR wrote:

this recursion scheme is going to work. But soO, 7th time's the charm!









Et tu Brute ?
Fatam
Profile Joined June 2012
1986 Posts
September 02 2017 03:28 GMT
#64
yeah rogue feels a bit kneejerk'ish of a placement.
Search "FTM" in SC2 | Latest Maps: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/528528-2-ftm-siegfried-station http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/525489-2-ftm-crimson-aftermath http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/sc2-maps/524737-2-ftm-grime
Sakat
Profile Blog Joined October 2014
Croatia1599 Posts
September 02 2017 06:08 GMT
#65
On September 02 2017 01:57 The_Red_Viper wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2017 01:08 Sakat wrote:
On September 02 2017 00:43 The_Red_Viper wrote:
Any comment on the possibility to add indicators for the ranking? Would be useful to see where the players ranked the edition before.

Community power rank = best power rank

Edit: I also object to the apparent lack of Zest in this PR because anything Stats can do, Zest can do better

Not sure if i will keep doing those now that the official ones are back, depends if people enjoyed it or not i guess

I can't speak for everyone but I certainly did. And I do find them to be more accurate then these ones
My boy Ptak defeated two GSL champions!
The_Red_Viper
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
19533 Posts
September 02 2017 07:32 GMT
#66
On September 02 2017 15:08 Sakat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2017 01:57 The_Red_Viper wrote:
On September 02 2017 01:08 Sakat wrote:
On September 02 2017 00:43 The_Red_Viper wrote:
Any comment on the possibility to add indicators for the ranking? Would be useful to see where the players ranked the edition before.

Community power rank = best power rank

Edit: I also object to the apparent lack of Zest in this PR because anything Stats can do, Zest can do better

Not sure if i will keep doing those now that the official ones are back, depends if people enjoyed it or not i guess

I can't speak for everyone but I certainly did. And I do find them to be more accurate then these ones

It certainly would be interesting because one could compare the community one with the official one, hmm
IU | Sohyang || There is no God and we are his prophets | For if ‘Thou mayest’—it is also true that ‘Thou mayest not.” | Ignorance is the parent of fear |
Fango
Profile Joined July 2016
United Kingdom8987 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-02 17:15:04
September 02 2017 17:14 GMT
#67
They rushed to put Gumiho on the PR when he won GSL, and now he's done literally nothing since, he gets dropped

Was GSL just bracket luck for him? We'll have to wait until Blizzcon to find out I guess.
Zest, sOs, PartinG, Dark, and Maru are the real champs. ROOT_herO is overrated. Snute, Serral, and Scarlett are the foreigner GOATs
Sakat
Profile Blog Joined October 2014
Croatia1599 Posts
September 02 2017 17:15 GMT
#68
On September 03 2017 02:14 Fango wrote:
They rushed to put Gumiho on the PR when he won GSL, and now he's done literally nothing since and drops of it

Was GSL just bracket luck for him? We'll have to wait until Blizzcon to find out I guess.

I think it was. He got mostly TvT where he is a beast, and soO in the finals.
If it were Dark there, I'm pretty sure he wouldn't be a GSL champion
My boy Ptak defeated two GSL champions!
Fango
Profile Joined July 2016
United Kingdom8987 Posts
September 02 2017 17:21 GMT
#69
On September 03 2017 02:15 Sakat wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 03 2017 02:14 Fango wrote:
They rushed to put Gumiho on the PR when he won GSL, and now he's done literally nothing since and drops of it

Was GSL just bracket luck for him? We'll have to wait until Blizzcon to find out I guess.

I think it was. He got mostly TvT where he is a beast, and soO in the finals.
If it were Dark there, I'm pretty sure he wouldn't be a GSL champion


TY in a ro8, Maru in a ro4, and soO in a finals. One could make a argument for Gumiho having bracket luck. He still played well though
Zest, sOs, PartinG, Dark, and Maru are the real champs. ROOT_herO is overrated. Snute, Serral, and Scarlett are the foreigner GOATs
Diabolique
Profile Joined June 2015
Czech Republic5118 Posts
September 02 2017 23:15 GMT
#70
On August 32 2017 11:36 She||zhock wrote:
$O$ SHOULD BE #1

Well, I also agree, but we will have to wait a few weeks for his GSL victory ... or even a few months for his BlizzCon victory.
sOs | Rogue | Maru | Trap | Scarlett | Snute | MC
Toudeleski
Profile Joined August 2011
United States66 Posts
September 03 2017 14:48 GMT
#71
Classic is too high, switch him a Gumiho, and then switch him and Byun. You're welcome.
glhf
Rolltide
Profile Joined May 2017
United States447 Posts
September 24 2017 16:35 GMT
#72
The list is atrocious. Dear has no business in the top 10 and Neeb has to be there somewhere.

Neeb is 2nd in the world in WCS points and is not there while Dear who is 27th in the world in WCS points is.

Seeker *
Profile Blog Joined April 2005
Where dat snitch at?36999 Posts
September 24 2017 16:40 GMT
#73
On September 25 2017 01:35 Rolltide wrote:
The list is atrocious. Dear has no business in the top 10 and Neeb has to be there somewhere.

Neeb is 2nd in the world in WCS points and is not there while Dear who is 27th in the world in WCS points is.


...

This PR is for Korean players only.
ModeratorPeople ask me, "Seeker, what are you seeking?" My answer? "Sleep, damn it! Always sleep!"
TL+ Member
DieuCure
Profile Joined January 2017
France3713 Posts
September 24 2017 16:45 GMT
#74
Byun and Solar in the top 10 isnt realistic
TL+ Member
brickrd
Profile Blog Joined March 2014
United States4894 Posts
September 24 2017 16:53 GMT
#75
the ferocity with which people argue these lists is so funny to me. i get that everyone has an opinion, and that's awesome - the point of these should be to stir debate. but i'll never grasp why people become deeply offended and feel compelled to personally attack the author of the list because they disagree about the order of some of the top 10 players. yeesh. being a spectator of an esport isn't a competition
TL+ Member
The_Red_Viper
Profile Blog Joined August 2013
19533 Posts
Last Edited: 2017-09-24 17:44:06
September 24 2017 16:57 GMT
#76
On September 25 2017 01:35 Rolltide wrote:
The list is atrocious. Dear has no business in the top 10 and Neeb has to be there somewhere.

Neeb is 2nd in the world in WCS points and is not there while Dear who is 27th in the world in WCS points is.


Your logic doesn't make much sense.
1) Comparing WCS players to korean ones playing in korea is incredibly hard because there is basically no data we can use. So people can really only speculate where Neeb would place if he would be considered (not entirely sure if foreign players are for this list). Saying that, Neeb didn't do well in GSL when he tried.

2) A power ranking is about which players are good right at the moment of the list. Realistically you use recent results for that. Wcs rankings showcase the general results of the year though. There is no difference between doing well in january or doing well now. A powerranking obviously doesn't care about old results.

I applaud your effort to post in other threads than the Zest fan club though

IU | Sohyang || There is no God and we are his prophets | For if ‘Thou mayest’—it is also true that ‘Thou mayest not.” | Ignorance is the parent of fear |
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Bellum Gens Elite
10:00
Stara Zagora 2025 Day 4
Reynor vs ShoWTimELIVE!
Serral vs Lambo
Clem vs Zoun
Bellum Gens Elite1405
ComeBackTV 390
TaKeTV 235
IndyStarCraft 77
3DClanTV 72
Rex68
LiquipediaDiscussion
CranKy Ducklings
10:00
Master Swan Open #92
CranKy Ducklings32
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
IndyStarCraft 77
Hui .68
EnDerr 25
Rex 0
Bellum Gens Elite0
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 17339
Sea 3494
Bisu 1316
Jaedong 902
Hyuk 601
BeSt 245
EffOrt 184
Zeus 177
PianO 123
sorry 97
[ Show more ]
Mind 89
Hyun 81
ZerO 33
Last 28
Sacsri 17
GoRush 15
Noble 7
ajuk12(nOOB) 5
Yoon 4
Dota 2
XcaliburYe681
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1291
byalli155
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor206
Other Games
singsing1543
Mew2King177
XaKoH 133
DeMusliM42
Lowko30
ZerO(Twitch)7
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream5998
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 22
lovetv 7
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 50
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Upcoming Events
SC Evo League
1h 45m
Fire Grow Cup
4h 45m
CSO Contender
6h 45m
BSL: ProLeague
7h 45m
StRyKeR vs MadiNho
Cross vs UltrA
TT1 vs JDConan
Bonyth vs Sziky
Replay Cast
13h 45m
SOOP Global
16h 45m
Creator vs Rogue
Cure vs Classic
SOOP
22h 45m
Classic vs GuMiho
Sparkling Tuna Cup
23h 45m
AllThingsProtoss
1d
Fire Grow Cup
1d 4h
[ Show More ]
BSL: ProLeague
1d 7h
HBO vs Doodle
spx vs Tech
DragOn vs Hawk
Dewalt vs TerrOr
Replay Cast
1d 13h
Replay Cast
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
GSL Code S
3 days
Rogue vs GuMiho
Maru vs Solar
Replay Cast
4 days
GSL Code S
4 days
herO vs TBD
Classic vs TBD
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
GSL Code S
5 days
WardiTV Invitational
6 days
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 1
DreamHack Dallas 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
2025 GSL S2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.