EPTTLMC8 Public Voting - Page 9
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
Make sure you follow instructions or your vote will not be counted! -Comment in this thread if you want to vote. -Vote for exactly five maps. | ||
|
Quateras
Germany867 Posts
| ||
|
TiberiusA
United States39 Posts
1. Ascension to Aiur 2. Hwangsan 3. Paradisia 4. Asteroid Barricade 5. Acolyte What I'm wondering is if Blizzard is actually considering using experimental resources or force fields on the ladder. | ||
|
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
On March 09 2017 04:41 TiberiusA wrote: Voted 1. Ascension to Aiur 2. Hwangsan 3. Paradisia 4. Asteroid Barricade 5. Acolyte What I'm wondering is if Blizzard is actually considering using experimental resources or force fields on the ladder. Experimental resources definitely. They made an entire category for them this contest. Neutral force fields... who knows. They have the problem that they aren't immediately intuitive. When Basetrade first cast Geumgangsan, they were wondering if the force fields disappeared after a time, if they could be destroyed in the same way as normal force fields etc. At least they now appear through the FOW and on the minimap. | ||
|
Brimir
1 Post
| ||
|
Nine Gates
Finland198 Posts
| ||
|
Lalabins
1 Post
| ||
|
Bounty
Germany35 Posts
| ||
|
ejozl
Denmark3326 Posts
I'm a little sad the Mineral Field was removed from Hunger Game in favour of Forcefields, mostly since it has more messy pathing, there's now a bit too few Mineral Fields on the map and no one is gonna bring Massive units to go cancel them, the way they were implemented on this map. On the same note I feel the same with Geumgangsan, where many force fields was removed. I mean the pathing is now better, but then this is something you will be prepared for if the entire map is force field themed. | ||
|
Toudeleski
United States66 Posts
| ||
|
Musicus
Germany23570 Posts
I now Blizz has the final say anyway, but still. | ||
|
CursOr
United States6335 Posts
On March 09 2017 06:38 Musicus wrote: I find it kinda weird that we don't see every single pro or GM player voting tbh. And then we get a ton of complainig again next season. I now Blizz has the final say anyway, but still. Ah yeah I totally feel the same way. If Elazer came out and said X map was really bad because of A,B and C it would carry a lot of weight... but think about what they risk if they come out. If they endorse a map, say this map is good or I voted for this, then it ends up being really bad for their race or then end up losing important games on it... they wouldn't have a back door to say that it was the maps fault or blizzard's fault, which is always nice to have. | ||
|
TheZergishOne
27 Posts
| ||
|
Psych
United States41 Posts
| ||
|
StraKo
Germany96 Posts
| ||
|
Carminedust
487 Posts
| ||
|
Mahanaim
Korea (South)1002 Posts
| ||
|
paralleluniverse
4065 Posts
Now I hope it doesn't win. | ||
|
-NegativeZero-
United States2141 Posts
On March 09 2017 10:16 paralleluniverse wrote: OMG. Voted for Hunger Game because it was one of my favorites before realizing they added force fields in the newest version. Seriously, get that weird shit out. Now I hope it doesn't win. what's wrong with weird shit? we'll never know if it'll work or not unless people try it out | ||
|
Ryu3600
Canada469 Posts
| ||
|
Dav1oN
Ukraine3164 Posts
Blood boil Acolyte Maxwell platform Asteroid barricade from my protoss perspective | ||
| ||
