• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 19:28
CEST 01:28
KST 08:28
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash6[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy11ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool49Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win42026 KungFu Cup Announcement6BGE Stara Zagora 2026 cancelled12
StarCraft 2
General
What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2) Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool Potential Updates Coming to the SC2 CN Server
Tourneys
RSL Season 4 announced for March-April Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) WardiTV Mondays World University TeamLeague (500$+) | Signups Open
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
Mutation # 519 Inner Power The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone Mutation # 517 Distant Threat
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash Pros React To: SoulKey vs Ample ASL21 General Discussion RepMastered™: replay sharing and analyzer site
Tourneys
[ASL21] Ro24 Group D [ASL21] Ro24 Group C [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Ro24 Group B
Strategy
What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Money Laundering In Video Ga…
TrAiDoS
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1572 users

Tempest rushing is a huge issue on the testmap - Page 4

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Lexender
Profile Joined September 2013
Mexico2656 Posts
October 09 2016 23:17 GMT
#61
On October 10 2016 08:05 Phaenoman wrote:
The Tempest does splash dmg? I am pretty sure that's not the case


It does, actually, deals splash damage.
404AlphaSquad
Profile Joined October 2011
839 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-09 23:48:18
October 09 2016 23:48 GMT
#62
On October 09 2016 12:29 parkufarku wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 08 2016 22:03 SC2Toastie wrote:
On October 08 2016 07:20 Jett.Jack.Alvir wrote:
So you're telling me that the Protoss can get all that (cyber, stargate, fleet beacon, 9 adepts, MoCore) and all you will have is 8 marines? 8 marines is 400 mineral.

400 mineral vs. over 1k/1k in units and structures........

Terran infrastructure is slower to kick in, Terran requires specific tech and upgrades to be competitive in a standard game, and there's the defensive advantage of travel time and planetary pylons.

The problem isn't that you can't hardcounter Tempest Rushes - the problem is that you die to everything and anything if they did not tempest rush.


Then try building a different infrastructure path?

My god, you Terrans will never change. Instead of adapting or trying new strategies, you whine until other races get nerfed to the ground. Good job, no wonder SC2 is dying since your real option of being a successful gamer is being a Terran player.

Yeah lets blame terran players for sc2's inevitable demise. moron...
aka Kalevi
Athenau
Profile Joined March 2015
571 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-10 00:04:16
October 10 2016 00:02 GMT
#63
On October 09 2016 12:29 parkufarku wrote:
Good job, no wonder SC2 is dying since your real option of being a successful gamer is being a Terran player.


http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Premier_Tournaments

2016 Premier Tournament Victories:

6Z, 6P, 3T

2016 Premier Tournament Runner-ups:

6Z, 6P, 3T

2015 Premier Tournament Victories:

7Z, 11P, 4T

2015 Premier Tournament Runner-ups:

13Z, 6P, 3T

Being immune to pesky things like "numbers" and "facts" must be pleasant. Unfortunately reality isn't so accommodating to the rest of us.
Wildmoon
Profile Joined December 2011
Thailand4189 Posts
October 10 2016 03:23 GMT
#64
Air units work best as supplementary units. Once they become the core unit then the game becomes really bad and bland because air units by their nature are uninteractive. They don't interact with terrain much and there are lots of units in the game that they simply hardcounter because a lot of units can not shoot up.
FoxDog
Profile Joined October 2007
170 Posts
October 10 2016 03:56 GMT
#65
On October 10 2016 12:23 Wildmoon wrote:
Air units work best as supplementary units. Once they become the core unit then the game becomes really bad and bland because air units by their nature are uninteractive. They don't interact with terrain much and there are lots of units in the game that they simply hardcounter because a lot of units can not shoot up.


Thank you, yet another voice of reason i dont get why david kim doesnt do whats right...
Remember without fear, there is no courage!
Hungry101
Profile Joined November 2015
25 Posts
October 10 2016 05:09 GMT
#66
Question: I haven't had much interaction with this Tempest problem (low leaguer here) but isn't it the same problem as with rush to Liberator with range (which I never quite understood how to counter anyway :/)?
Djzapz
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada10681 Posts
October 10 2016 05:45 GMT
#67
On October 10 2016 12:56 FoxDog wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 10 2016 12:23 Wildmoon wrote:
Air units work best as supplementary units. Once they become the core unit then the game becomes really bad and bland because air units by their nature are uninteractive. They don't interact with terrain much and there are lots of units in the game that they simply hardcounter because a lot of units can not shoot up.


Thank you, yet another voice of reason i dont get why david kim doesnt do whats right...

I don't necessarily entirely agree with the idea. The tempest certainly is concerning but there have been many instances of air units as the core of an army have been interesting, like mutalisks in SCBW which managed to be cool despite the lack of interaction with the terrain, and tech swaps to carriers. Both of those involved some impressive micro, especially in the case of mutalisks. Mutas in ZvZ were just complete nutso.
"My incompetence with power tools had been increasing exponentially over the course of 20 years spent inhaling experimental oven cleaners"
Wildmoon
Profile Joined December 2011
Thailand4189 Posts
October 10 2016 06:00 GMT
#68
On October 10 2016 14:45 Djzapz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 10 2016 12:56 FoxDog wrote:
On October 10 2016 12:23 Wildmoon wrote:
Air units work best as supplementary units. Once they become the core unit then the game becomes really bad and bland because air units by their nature are uninteractive. They don't interact with terrain much and there are lots of units in the game that they simply hardcounter because a lot of units can not shoot up.


Thank you, yet another voice of reason i dont get why david kim doesnt do whats right...

I don't necessarily entirely agree with the idea. The tempest certainly is concerning but there have been many instances of air units as the core of an army have been interesting, like mutalisks in SCBW which managed to be cool despite the lack of interaction with the terrain, and tech swaps to carriers. Both of those involved some impressive micro, especially in the case of mutalisks. Mutas in ZvZ were just complete nutso.


ZvZ in BW was bad at least imo.
blade55555
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States17423 Posts
October 10 2016 06:17 GMT
#69
On October 08 2016 03:41 Th1rdEye wrote:
I kinda agree with the power of air units in SC2.

Been playing BW lately only... Mutalisks can die to turrets and marines, irradiate etc... Wraiths die to spores/turret etc, Scouts/Sairs can be defended. All the air units in BW can be countered relatively easily.. Mass carrier sair is still tough but there are still ways to deal with it pretty easily if you dont micro right.

All the air units have their places but aren't super OP. A dropship is slow enough to be caught if you're scouting properly etc. Protoss speed shuttles are fast but in BW you wont just straight up lose a game because u lost a mineral line of workers.

. I played since Beta of WOL.


Air units in SC2 has been my biggest complaint throughout all of sc2's life. I have always hated seeing just how strong air armies are in the late game.

I won't expand really anymore because you essentially said what I think 100%. I really, really wish Blizzard would look at air units/drop harass and change it, but I gave up on that years ago.
When I think of something else, something will go here
RoomOfMush
Profile Joined March 2015
1296 Posts
October 10 2016 06:19 GMT
#70
On October 10 2016 14:45 Djzapz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 10 2016 12:56 FoxDog wrote:
On October 10 2016 12:23 Wildmoon wrote:
Air units work best as supplementary units. Once they become the core unit then the game becomes really bad and bland because air units by their nature are uninteractive. They don't interact with terrain much and there are lots of units in the game that they simply hardcounter because a lot of units can not shoot up.


Thank you, yet another voice of reason i dont get why david kim doesnt do whats right...

I don't necessarily entirely agree with the idea. The tempest certainly is concerning but there have been many instances of air units as the core of an army have been interesting, like mutalisks in SCBW which managed to be cool despite the lack of interaction with the terrain, and tech swaps to carriers. Both of those involved some impressive micro, especially in the case of mutalisks. Mutas in ZvZ were just complete nutso.

Mutalisks were not core army units in BW. Mutalisk die to almost every anti-air unit in the game in a fair fight. They get evaporated by the anti-air of T and P especially.
The benefit of Mutalisks in BW was that they didnt need to fight fair. They could kite their low-range (marine) enemies, abuse terrain (against dragoons for example) and always threaten the opponent with a back stab while the zerg player was bunkering up behind static defense.
todespolka
Profile Joined November 2012
221 Posts
October 10 2016 06:29 GMT
#71
On October 08 2016 03:31 Beelzebub1 wrote:
Yea I'm not too sure why they need more information, play a few games vs Protoss or look on any thread regarding the test map and Tempests are heavily complained about, I'm one of those complainers lol the ability lasts WAAY too long and is WAAY too good at shutting down mineral lines, like this game really needs yet another unit that massacres economy T__T

I guess what I meant to say was, "Like this game needs yet another aerial unit that requires an extremely specific response or it's gg" like pretty much every other air unit in the game.

Mutalisks? OP as shit and has required so many band aid buffs that now they aren't even viable because they threat of them being viable is enough to force a blind counter (Opening Stargate) or kill them before Spire (2 base allins)

Liberators? Massacres drones, massacres all aerial units except dedicated anti - air units like the Corruptor with carapace upgrades and good splits. Required band aid buffs to actually have a non ludicrous place in the game

Oracles? Ending games with proxy nonsense since HOTS and it's even more strong in LOTV due to kick started economy. Incinerates workers too fast to even react, incinerates small groups of light units too fast to micro against, OP vision granting abilities that last for almost a minute.

Void Rays? Pretty much had to be nerfed to shit because they are the ultimate snow ball out of control unit that is only countered by money fungals

Carriers? So strong that even high level Zergs usually just get lucky when they defeat this composition in mass, I'm never going to have unit control like Snute and he barely scrapes by the skin of his teeth vs mass Carrier turtle Protoss.

Brood lords? So strong that they renamed the expansion Lings of Liberty because combined with Fungals was utterly unstoppable

Does anyone see a recurring theme here? It's not just Tempests (which the OP is totally justified in complaining about) it's just fucking air units in general. They are too damn strong, and they are especially too damn strong vs economy, a big part of what makes LOTV so punishing and oppressive to play at times.


Its because people lie and often complain because of frustration and not because its a real problem. How are you able to know who is right? There is no way to tell who is right except time.

We had many incidents in history of our community, where the majority was wrong. Also many of us have a different opinion (i know some people believe their opinion is the only opinion).
todespolka
Profile Joined November 2012
221 Posts
October 10 2016 06:34 GMT
#72
On October 10 2016 15:19 RoomOfMush wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 10 2016 14:45 Djzapz wrote:
On October 10 2016 12:56 FoxDog wrote:
On October 10 2016 12:23 Wildmoon wrote:
Air units work best as supplementary units. Once they become the core unit then the game becomes really bad and bland because air units by their nature are uninteractive. They don't interact with terrain much and there are lots of units in the game that they simply hardcounter because a lot of units can not shoot up.


Thank you, yet another voice of reason i dont get why david kim doesnt do whats right...

I don't necessarily entirely agree with the idea. The tempest certainly is concerning but there have been many instances of air units as the core of an army have been interesting, like mutalisks in SCBW which managed to be cool despite the lack of interaction with the terrain, and tech swaps to carriers. Both of those involved some impressive micro, especially in the case of mutalisks. Mutas in ZvZ were just complete nutso.

Mutalisks were not core army units in BW. Mutalisk die to almost every anti-air unit in the game in a fair fight. They get evaporated by the anti-air of T and P especially.
The benefit of Mutalisks in BW was that they didnt need to fight fair. They could kite their low-range (marine) enemies, abuse terrain (against dragoons for example) and always threaten the opponent with a back stab while the zerg player was bunkering up behind static defense.


A fair fight can mean a lot. Mutas were not that bad. But the strength of air units comes from stacking, which gives them a huge advantage (X units attacking 1 unit).
todespolka
Profile Joined November 2012
221 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-10-10 06:43:51
October 10 2016 06:43 GMT
#73
On October 09 2016 19:00 MockHamill wrote:
Yeah I stopped playing the testmap due to Tempest and mass Swarmhosts.

What is the point of trying to make mech viable if you introduce broken things like that?

I do not understand why Blizzard makes changes that makes the game worse.

It would have been sufficient to
1. Remove Tankivacs
2. Increase tank damage
3. Increase Tempest supply to 6.

No other changes are needed and they may just introduce unnecessary problems like mass swarmhost games or Tempest storming your mineral lines.


Its not about making mech viable. Its also about giving other races a way to deal with it. Why is that difficult to understand?

They try to find out how they can counter mech with positional play. Thats an extremely good idea. But the spell is essentially a force field, they need a better way.

Salteador Neo
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Andorra5591 Posts
October 10 2016 07:52 GMT
#74
There's already a couple of nice suggestions in the thread, like making the ability require a research or make it some kind of earthquake type of thing, so it doesn't affect hovering units (workers and archons afaik).
Revolutionist fan
Djzapz
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada10681 Posts
October 10 2016 12:37 GMT
#75
On October 10 2016 15:19 RoomOfMush wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 10 2016 14:45 Djzapz wrote:
On October 10 2016 12:56 FoxDog wrote:
On October 10 2016 12:23 Wildmoon wrote:
Air units work best as supplementary units. Once they become the core unit then the game becomes really bad and bland because air units by their nature are uninteractive. They don't interact with terrain much and there are lots of units in the game that they simply hardcounter because a lot of units can not shoot up.


Thank you, yet another voice of reason i dont get why david kim doesnt do whats right...

I don't necessarily entirely agree with the idea. The tempest certainly is concerning but there have been many instances of air units as the core of an army have been interesting, like mutalisks in SCBW which managed to be cool despite the lack of interaction with the terrain, and tech swaps to carriers. Both of those involved some impressive micro, especially in the case of mutalisks. Mutas in ZvZ were just complete nutso.

Mutalisks were not core army units in BW. Mutalisk die to almost every anti-air unit in the game in a fair fight. They get evaporated by the anti-air of T and P especially.
The benefit of Mutalisks in BW was that they didnt need to fight fair. They could kite their low-range (marine) enemies, abuse terrain (against dragoons for example) and always threaten the opponent with a back stab while the zerg player was bunkering up behind static defense.

It's specific to ZvZ, they could be a core unit then and IMO it's would be one of the more interesting ways in which ZvZ could be played, especially when devourers and queens started to come out.
"My incompetence with power tools had been increasing exponentially over the course of 20 years spent inhaling experimental oven cleaners"
Phaenoman
Profile Joined February 2013
568 Posts
October 10 2016 13:06 GMT
#76
On October 10 2016 08:17 Lexender wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 10 2016 08:05 Phaenoman wrote:
The Tempest does splash dmg? I am pretty sure that's not the case


It does, actually, deals splash damage.

What? I am talking about the basic attack. There is no splash.
Random is hard work dude...
RoomOfMush
Profile Joined March 2015
1296 Posts
October 10 2016 13:35 GMT
#77
On October 10 2016 15:34 todespolka wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 10 2016 15:19 RoomOfMush wrote:
On October 10 2016 14:45 Djzapz wrote:
On October 10 2016 12:56 FoxDog wrote:
On October 10 2016 12:23 Wildmoon wrote:
Air units work best as supplementary units. Once they become the core unit then the game becomes really bad and bland because air units by their nature are uninteractive. They don't interact with terrain much and there are lots of units in the game that they simply hardcounter because a lot of units can not shoot up.


Thank you, yet another voice of reason i dont get why david kim doesnt do whats right...

I don't necessarily entirely agree with the idea. The tempest certainly is concerning but there have been many instances of air units as the core of an army have been interesting, like mutalisks in SCBW which managed to be cool despite the lack of interaction with the terrain, and tech swaps to carriers. Both of those involved some impressive micro, especially in the case of mutalisks. Mutas in ZvZ were just complete nutso.

Mutalisks were not core army units in BW. Mutalisk die to almost every anti-air unit in the game in a fair fight. They get evaporated by the anti-air of T and P especially.
The benefit of Mutalisks in BW was that they didnt need to fight fair. They could kite their low-range (marine) enemies, abuse terrain (against dragoons for example) and always threaten the opponent with a back stab while the zerg player was bunkering up behind static defense.


A fair fight can mean a lot. Mutas were not that bad. But the strength of air units comes from stacking, which gives them a huge advantage (X units attacking 1 unit).

When I said fair I meant mutas vs an army of roughly equal cost. Of course 10 mutas will win vs 10 marines; even with bad micro. But 10 mutas vs 40 marines (if we count gas cost == mineral cost) then the mutas will get shredded unless you play with no latency at all and are a god of muta micro and abuse the range advantage of mutas to its extreme.

To put it another way: If you go mass muta and your opponent knows that you go mass muta there is no way on earth you can win that game unless you are far better than your opponent.

On October 10 2016 21:37 Djzapz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 10 2016 15:19 RoomOfMush wrote:
On October 10 2016 14:45 Djzapz wrote:
On October 10 2016 12:56 FoxDog wrote:
On October 10 2016 12:23 Wildmoon wrote:
Air units work best as supplementary units. Once they become the core unit then the game becomes really bad and bland because air units by their nature are uninteractive. They don't interact with terrain much and there are lots of units in the game that they simply hardcounter because a lot of units can not shoot up.


Thank you, yet another voice of reason i dont get why david kim doesnt do whats right...

I don't necessarily entirely agree with the idea. The tempest certainly is concerning but there have been many instances of air units as the core of an army have been interesting, like mutalisks in SCBW which managed to be cool despite the lack of interaction with the terrain, and tech swaps to carriers. Both of those involved some impressive micro, especially in the case of mutalisks. Mutas in ZvZ were just complete nutso.

Mutalisks were not core army units in BW. Mutalisk die to almost every anti-air unit in the game in a fair fight. They get evaporated by the anti-air of T and P especially.
The benefit of Mutalisks in BW was that they didnt need to fight fair. They could kite their low-range (marine) enemies, abuse terrain (against dragoons for example) and always threaten the opponent with a back stab while the zerg player was bunkering up behind static defense.

It's specific to ZvZ, they could be a core unit then and IMO it's would be one of the more interesting ways in which ZvZ could be played, especially when devourers and queens started to come out.

ZvZ in BW was pretty extreme. I wouldnt even talk about "core army units" in ZvZ because most of the time there was no army. The game was (most of the time) over after a couple of minutes with both players racing for mutalisks with a couple of lings and scourge on the way. This was mainly (in my opinion) because there was no mobile anti-air unit for Z which was good against light air units. Hydras were good anti-air, but only against heavy units which mutas are not. The only other anti-air for zerg was mutas and scourge, both of which have the same tech path and both of which your enemy is building also. ZvZ was forced into muta-vs-muta because zerg did not have any good ground anti-air that could deal with mutas.
jinjin5000
Profile Joined May 2010
United States1488 Posts
October 10 2016 16:45 GMT
#78
Not to mention I said terrain is going mech, there is no real counter until you amass vikings to counter tempests. Mech ground to air is abysmal especially wth cyclone change

Tempests easily beat 2 viking BTW
FoxDog
Profile Joined October 2007
170 Posts
October 10 2016 21:31 GMT
#79
On October 10 2016 09:02 Athenau wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 09 2016 12:29 parkufarku wrote:
Good job, no wonder SC2 is dying since your real option of being a successful gamer is being a Terran player.


http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Premier_Tournaments

2016 Premier Tournament Victories:

6Z, 6P, 3T

2016 Premier Tournament Runner-ups:

6Z, 6P, 3T

2015 Premier Tournament Victories:

7Z, 11P, 4T

2015 Premier Tournament Runner-ups:

13Z, 6P, 3T

Being immune to pesky things like "numbers" and "facts" must be pleasant. Unfortunately reality isn't so accommodating to the rest of us.


haha and thats just tournament results, nevermind having to play at that level for the game to function properly!
Remember without fear, there is no courage!
FoxDog
Profile Joined October 2007
170 Posts
October 11 2016 02:11 GMT
#80
On October 10 2016 22:06 Phaenoman wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 10 2016 08:17 Lexender wrote:
On October 10 2016 08:05 Phaenoman wrote:
The Tempest does splash dmg? I am pretty sure that's not the case


It does, actually, deals splash damage.

What? I am talking about the basic attack. There is no splash.


the new testmap ability does its why i made this entire post, to highlight!
Remember without fear, there is no courage!
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 32m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft478
SteadfastSC 85
SpeCial 35
JuggernautJason33
StarCraft: Brood War
Artosis 501
Shine 21
Bale 9
Dota 2
monkeys_forever579
League of Legends
JimRising 397
Super Smash Bros
AZ_Axe108
PPMD57
Other Games
summit1g11345
shahzam506
C9.Mang0172
ToD163
Maynarde75
Trikslyr32
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick480
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 99
• davetesta1
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki19
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21641
• Noizen34
League of Legends
• Doublelift3589
Other Games
• imaqtpie1062
• Scarra977
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
32m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
10h 32m
Afreeca Starleague
10h 32m
Rush vs PianO
Flash vs Speed
PiGosaur Cup
1d
Replay Cast
1d 9h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 10h
BeSt vs Leta
Queen vs Jaedong
Replay Cast
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
OSC
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
TriGGeR vs Cure
ByuN vs Rogue
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Maru vs MaxPax
BSL
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
BSL
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2026 Changsha Offline CUP
WardiTV Winter 2026
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
CSL Elite League 2026
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 1
ASL Season 21
Acropolis #4 - TS6
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
RSL Revival: Season 4
Nations Cup 2026
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual

Upcoming

CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
Escore Tournament S2: W1
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.