EPTOn September 30 2016 05:59 lestye wrote:
That seems incredibly broken for ranked matchmaking.
That seems incredibly broken for ranked matchmaking.
next up, separate matchup MMR
Patch 3.7 Preview: Separate MMR Per Race - Page 3
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
Jer99
Canada8159 Posts
next up, separate matchup MMR | ||
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
| ||
|
Elentos
55585 Posts
On September 30 2016 05:59 lestye wrote: That seems incredibly broken for ranked matchmaking. It's also not a great idea because the races aren't equally divided. On most levels Protoss is the least common race (exceptions being Bronze, Silver & GM) while Terran and Zerg are about even. You will greatly increase your queue times by removing a race, especially when you consider other people might not like playing against your race. | ||
|
Grumbels
Netherlands7032 Posts
On September 30 2016 03:40 lestye wrote: I don't see how its too little too late. Are you saying there's going to be no one that's going to find this useful? That couldn't be further from the truth. Because people asked for this for five years and it is trivial to implement, and there is a recent pattern of Blizzard finally giving in to community requests after ignoring them for no reason for years. I think there must be a reason for this, presumably along the lines of: "oh we can't add improvements to the game because it might confuse precious casuals" but now they feel like just implementing community suggestions is cheap content to produce and there are no casual players left anyway. | ||
|
Dungeontay
126 Posts
still nice to have (now) finally i can play terran, zerg and adept on one server | ||
|
SinO[Ob]
France898 Posts
On September 30 2016 06:12 Dungeontay wrote: 6 years later.... still nice to have (now) finally i can play terran, zerg and adept on one server Heres a cookie. You made me laugh! :D | ||
|
lestye
United States4209 Posts
On September 30 2016 06:05 Grumbels wrote: Because people asked for this for five years and it is trivial to implement, and there is a recent pattern of Blizzard finally giving in to community requests after ignoring them for no reason for years. I think there must be a reason for this, presumably along the lines of: "oh we can't add improvements to the game because it might confuse precious casuals" but now they feel like just implementing community suggestions is cheap content to produce and there are no casual players left anyway. Trivial? I don't know about that. Maybe its not trivial ? And maybe the returns of such a feature is not as high as you would think. Unranked matchmaking, which was lauded as incredibly important because the precious casuals can't handle ladder anxiety didn't exactly create the 2nd renaissance of the game. | ||
|
Rollora
2450 Posts
On September 30 2016 02:24 phodacbiet wrote: Ah, after 6 years. The technology is finally here. Almost. Crazy how slowly they are developing. Its hard to watch. Every year since the release I hope "maybe this game will finally get good, maybe it will finally be the game I waited for so long". But it still isn't. Multiplayer against some races is still too frustrating because of the amount of possible bullshit you can play and that a single misclick can cost you the game no matter how much ahead you were before. So in addition to different MMR per race I would have hoped that even if you play your main race, you have different MMR not only for the race you play but also the race you play against. For instance: Lets assume my main is Terran: My TvZ is great but since cheese is very ez to pull off and sometimes hard to defend, I lose a lot against bullshit-tosses. So I want a different MMR for that. Same for Terran, as basically I don't play TvT, I leave it at the first second cause sometimes even if you won a game the opponent plays ultradefensive and just costs you time, so it frustrates me to win that game in a very slow manner. And many more situations where I would like having a different MMR not for each race but for each matchup. I know this would be even harder to implement, but there is still hope. | ||
|
Rollora
2450 Posts
On September 30 2016 03:34 esReveR wrote: F*ck it has already been a year?FINALLY!!! I have been waiting for separate MMRs since it was announced last Blizzcon. Can't wait for patch day! I need to get a job at Blizzard. With my working speed I would fit in there perfectly... | ||
|
PinoKotsBeer
Netherlands1385 Posts
| ||
|
BronzeKnee
United States5222 Posts
Dude, don't complain. The technology just wasn't there yet before. Someday, maybe we'll be able to play SC2 over a local area network (LAN). It is really cutting edge tech, but imagine tournaments never having to deal with network issues or DDOS attacks. Good things take time though. On September 30 2016 06:48 Rollora wrote: F*ck it has already been a year? I need to get a job at Blizzard. With my working speed I would fit in there perfectly... Two posts on this forum in one day? That is way too much for Blizzard... Davyie can only handle one post per month, and he demands his posts be in his special blue color like his birthday cake and his favorite underwear. So yeah, I don't think you are qualified. | ||
|
Shield
Bulgaria4824 Posts
| ||
|
BronzeKnee
United States5222 Posts
I might be a ghost then. | ||
|
ggrrg
Bulgaria2716 Posts
| ||
|
washikie
United States752 Posts
as a frequent offracer I'm so hyped for this now I can see on my own server with good latency how far my protoss cannon rushes can carry me, I'm hoping to masters. So I can claim my p is as strong as my t. It was fun to get to diamond on kr with 50% cannon Rush but im super excited to try it on Na this time I won't quite if I lose a game and do some other strat! Thanks Bliz. | ||
|
Matte3D
Sweden26 Posts
| ||
|
Little-Chimp
Canada949 Posts
On September 30 2016 05:49 -Archangel- wrote: Main reason why I stopped playing ladder is that I didn't enjoy ZvZ and had no way to skip that matchup. Wake me up when you are able to choose what races to play again on ladder. zzzzzz lol that's a terrible idea | ||
|
Grumbels
Netherlands7032 Posts
On September 30 2016 06:20 lestye wrote: Trivial? I don't know about that. Maybe its not trivial ? And maybe the returns of such a feature is not as high as you would think. Unranked matchmaking, which was lauded as incredibly important because the precious casuals can't handle ladder anxiety didn't exactly create the 2nd renaissance of the game. Nobody says it is super important but it is just nice to have and common sense. And don't tell me that professional programmers can't code a separate mmr per race within like half an hour. | ||
|
Ansinjunger
United States2451 Posts
| ||
|
washikie
United States752 Posts
| ||
| ||
