The only thing that sucks is that it's gonna take a while for all the missions to be released and I was hoping it was gonna cost 5 euros for each mission pack without pre-ordering.
It looks like I'm gonna have to pre-order and hope it's worth the money.
On December 03 2015 00:36 DifuntO wrote: The only thing that sucks is that it's gonna take a while for all the missions to be released and I was hoping it was gonna cost 5 euros for each mission pack without pre-ordering.
It looks like I'm gonna have to pre-order and hope it's worth the money.
You should wait until much closer to release, and perhaps even after release. Chances are the full bundle price will stay the same, just like how adventures are with Hearthstone.
On December 02 2015 22:11 -Archangel- wrote: This is hilarious. I just recently bought a 20+ hour newly released game that cost less than 15e. And looks as nice as SC2. And this pack will have like 3-4 hours of gameplay. Blizzard is funny. I guess my choice of not giving them anymore money after they tricked me with DIII was good. Fool me once and all that...
How's the voice-over work or the cinematics in that game?
I don't care for that. Blizzard stories after Sc1, D2 and maybe Wc3 are cheesy and stupid anyways.
Subjective.
You seriously want to defend a blizzard story that came after that? Please go ahead so i can tear you to pieces.
If u don't like it, don't play it. I like it, I played it. Very simple. Now calm down and let subjective things be subjective. Cuz that's what it is: A matter of taste.
On December 02 2015 22:11 -Archangel- wrote: This is hilarious. I just recently bought a 20+ hour newly released game that cost less than 15e. And looks as nice as SC2. And this pack will have like 3-4 hours of gameplay. Blizzard is funny. I guess my choice of not giving them anymore money after they tricked me with DIII was good. Fool me once and all that...
How's the voice-over work or the cinematics in that game?
I don't care for that. Blizzard stories after Sc1, D2 and maybe Wc3 are cheesy and stupid anyways.
Subjective.
You seriously want to defend a blizzard story that came after that? Please go ahead so i can tear you to pieces.
If u don't like it, don't play it. I like it, I played it. Very simple. Now calm down and let subjective things be subjective. Cuz that's what it is: A matter of taste.
What is there to enjoy? They are all stories geared toward 12 year olds. Its pathetic and insulting.
I think this is ridiculous, and I can't believe Blizzard is making extra $$ of of StarCraft like this, it totally goes against what SC is about, but I guess if others enjoy it, it is a good thing. Haha ill shut up and go in my corner =p
On December 03 2015 04:59 GGzerG wrote: I think this is ridiculous, and I can't believe Blizzard is making extra $$ of of StarCraft like this, it totally goes against what SC is about, but I guess if others enjoy it, it is a good thing. Haha ill shut up and go in my corner =p
well more income for sc means more support for the starcraft scene by blizzard... i hope sc2 will life a long time
Interesting to note that it requires only starter edition. So it looks like bliz is thinking of using the dlc to get people into sc2. Interesting idea I think.
On December 02 2015 22:11 -Archangel- wrote: This is hilarious. I just recently bought a 20+ hour newly released game that cost less than 15e. And looks as nice as SC2. And this pack will have like 3-4 hours of gameplay. Blizzard is funny. I guess my choice of not giving them anymore money after they tricked me with DIII was good. Fool me once and all that...
How's the voice-over work or the cinematics in that game?
I don't care for that. Blizzard stories after Sc1, D2 and maybe Wc3 are cheesy and stupid anyways.
Subjective.
You seriously want to defend a blizzard story that came after that? Please go ahead so i can tear you to pieces.
If u don't like it, don't play it. I like it, I played it. Very simple. Now calm down and let subjective things be subjective. Cuz that's what it is: A matter of taste.
What is there to enjoy? They are all stories geared toward 12 year olds. Its pathetic and insulting.
I am gonna tell u a secret. Do not share with others, ok? + Show Spoiler +
I enjoyed playing it. And I will play it again. Just for u.
On December 02 2015 22:11 -Archangel- wrote: This is hilarious. I just recently bought a 20+ hour newly released game that cost less than 15e. And looks as nice as SC2. And this pack will have like 3-4 hours of gameplay. Blizzard is funny. I guess my choice of not giving them anymore money after they tricked me with DIII was good. Fool me once and all that...
How's the voice-over work or the cinematics in that game?
I don't care for that. Blizzard stories after Sc1, D2 and maybe Wc3 are cheesy and stupid anyways.
Subjective.
You seriously want to defend a blizzard story that came after that? Please go ahead so i can tear you to pieces.
If u don't like it, don't play it. I like it, I played it. Very simple. Now calm down and let subjective things be subjective. Cuz that's what it is: A matter of taste.
What is there to enjoy? They are all stories geared toward 12 year olds. Its pathetic and insulting.
On December 02 2015 22:11 -Archangel- wrote: This is hilarious. I just recently bought a 20+ hour newly released game that cost less than 15e. And looks as nice as SC2. And this pack will have like 3-4 hours of gameplay. Blizzard is funny. I guess my choice of not giving them anymore money after they tricked me with DIII was good. Fool me once and all that...
How's the voice-over work or the cinematics in that game?
I don't care for that. Blizzard stories after Sc1, D2 and maybe Wc3 are cheesy and stupid anyways.
Subjective.
You seriously want to defend a blizzard story that came after that? Please go ahead so i can tear you to pieces.
If u don't like it, don't play it. I like it, I played it. Very simple. Now calm down and let subjective things be subjective. Cuz that's what it is: A matter of taste.
What is there to enjoy? They are all stories geared toward 12 year olds. Its pathetic and insulting.
Well Blizzard want that sc2 is allowed & friendly for 12 yo kids, thereforce the story should be adapted accordingly.
On December 02 2015 18:51 Biolunar wrote: Fucking preorder bonuses. Fuck you marketing department. This is the first time a Starcraft title has content locked behind a preorder pay wall and you guys are celbrating that? To quote some Star Wars: Preordering is the stupidest shit in the gaming industry right now. Why would you even do that? Since there will be no boxed copy you have NO argument that preordering has benefits. Just buy it the day you want to play it, you have it immediately available. That’s why they lock that portrait and the skin behind the preorder wall so we have a reason to buy it before we even know if it’s any good. Come on that’s bullshit.
It's 33% cheaper if I preorder it, that's reason enough.
On December 02 2015 22:11 -Archangel- wrote: This is hilarious. I just recently bought a 20+ hour newly released game that cost less than 15e. And looks as nice as SC2. And this pack will have like 3-4 hours of gameplay. Blizzard is funny. I guess my choice of not giving them anymore money after they tricked me with DIII was good. Fool me once and all that...
How's the voice-over work or the cinematics in that game?
I don't care for that. Blizzard stories after Sc1, D2 and maybe Wc3 are cheesy and stupid anyways.
Subjective.
You seriously want to defend a blizzard story that came after that? Please go ahead so i can tear you to pieces.
If u don't like it, don't play it. I like it, I played it. Very simple. Now calm down and let subjective things be subjective. Cuz that's what it is: A matter of taste.
What is there to enjoy? They are all stories geared toward 12 year olds. Its pathetic and insulting.
Their stories are cheesy, but they can be entertaining. It's a Blizzard game, I'm not sitting there to be enlightened by their philosophical deep story, I'm playing it for fun.
On December 03 2015 06:29 lestye wrote: It's 33% cheaper if I preorder it, that's reason enough.
What makes you think they would remove the bundle after launch. If Hearthstone is any indicator, the bundle will still be there, but you won't get the portrait.
Love this, hope Blizzard keeps doing more of it. Always looking for more single player campaign/missions. Although the price does seem a bit high, have to wait and see when it releases.
If it wouldn't be Nova I would probably wait for a demonstration. Multiple approach games usually end up being really short for me, as I usually just like the sneaky approach. What content is preorder paywall though ? x.x If its the bonus items then ... nvm.
On December 02 2015 22:11 -Archangel- wrote: This is hilarious. I just recently bought a 20+ hour newly released game that cost less than 15e. And looks as nice as SC2. And this pack will have like 3-4 hours of gameplay. Blizzard is funny. I guess my choice of not giving them anymore money after they tricked me with DIII was good. Fool me once and all that...
How's the voice-over work or the cinematics in that game?
I don't care for that. Blizzard stories after Sc1, D2 and maybe Wc3 are cheesy and stupid anyways.
Subjective.
You seriously want to defend a blizzard story that came after that? Please go ahead so i can tear you to pieces.
If u don't like it, don't play it. I like it, I played it. Very simple. Now calm down and let subjective things be subjective. Cuz that's what it is: A matter of taste.
What is there to enjoy? They are all stories geared toward 12 year olds. Its pathetic and insulting.
Never stopped nintendo or platinum games.
Nintendo is pretty good at making a really dark plot that looks like happy happy land. So there is something for everyone in it. Blizzard does the same. In any case it will always go past someone who doesn't even want to look at it.
Best example is people that like the Sc1 story and dislike the Sc2 story. Because they are not basically the same >.> .
EPT
