|
Based on the official Police investigation, only the above players have been implicated in matchfixing. There is no reason to further accuse other players and teams until we get more information. Incessant blind accusations will not be tolerated. Please read the thread and the updates before posting. As of page 54 we will be moderating against match fixing accusations for players who were not caught in this incident, including those using voided Pinnacle bets as evidence. |
On October 19 2015 21:00 KrazyTrumpet wrote:Show nested quote +On October 19 2015 20:30 DJHelium wrote:On October 19 2015 20:29 Penev wrote:On October 19 2015 20:21 lichter wrote: The fact that fixers passed on false fixes makes Pinnacle and other third party (in that they were not the main sites used for betting) betting sites useless as evidence. Their voided bets essentially mean nothing because of confirmation bias. Anyone who keeps referring to the voided bets is delusional especially since the proven fixes were mostly not voided. Any reference to Pinnacle as evidence will be judged harshly. Where can I find this? I'm apparently blind to this information. :-S This is exactly why you can't use betting lines as "incontrovertible proof." Numbers and statistics can say literally anything you want them to. You can't. These voided matches are still suspect though. Suspect to being either falsely or "genuinely" fixed. Either way they indicated that something was wrong.
|
Wow, this is terrible. The SC2 scene is shrinking anyway, and this won't exactly help attract sponsors. There's just not enough money in the business for all except a few top players. Mid tier players, and apparently coaches in financial distress, may be susceptible to offers of easy money. After all, I imagine the risk of being caught is rather slim. How would the authorities ever know except if one of the involved parties admits the crime?
|
What on earht I woke up to. This is... just wow..
|
|
One thing worth mentioning is Pinnacle is no longer the only major western sportsbook to offer lines on SC2 matches any more. It's not that relevant to this thread, but in the case of future bets being voided if they are there are several other major sportsbooks offering lines on SC2 now. Even betting exchanges like Matchbook have SC2 lines posted now.
|
I really liked Prime as a team. And i really liked YoDa and B4, they werent the top dogs of SC2 but they werent terrible either
As for now i do hate them for that, but i really really really hope to see them play again...somewhere. They are still good players no matter what anyone say. You cant trash them for throwing 5 games during their whole career. (And yes i am aware how huge matchfixing scandals blows up both in korea and rest of the world)
Its not like they robbed a bank or commited a murder. So yes eventho as of right now i hate them for what they did, i still feel like they deserve a second chance...maybe not now or a week from now but give it a couple of months maybe a year.
|
On October 19 2015 21:09 Penev wrote:Show nested quote +On October 19 2015 21:00 KrazyTrumpet wrote:On October 19 2015 20:30 DJHelium wrote:On October 19 2015 20:29 Penev wrote:On October 19 2015 20:21 lichter wrote: The fact that fixers passed on false fixes makes Pinnacle and other third party (in that they were not the main sites used for betting) betting sites useless as evidence. Their voided bets essentially mean nothing because of confirmation bias. Anyone who keeps referring to the voided bets is delusional especially since the proven fixes were mostly not voided. Any reference to Pinnacle as evidence will be judged harshly. Where can I find this? I'm apparently blind to this information. :-S https://twitter.com/SaintSnorlax/status/655978939467350016https://twitter.com/SaintSnorlax/status/655979351440236544 This is exactly why you can't use betting lines as "incontrovertible proof." Numbers and statistics can say literally anything you want them to. You can't. These voided matches are still suspect though. Suspect to being either falsely or "genuinely" fixed. Either way they indicated that something was wrong.
But they were never *ever* "100% proof" that the players in question were matchmaking. Too many people around here saw bets being voided, and immediately jumped to the conclusion that the only rational reason is because Players X and/or Y DEFINITELY match fixed.
Turns out, not the case!
|
Italy12246 Posts
Well, fuck
|
Looks like the force won't be on Yoda's side today.
|
On October 19 2015 21:00 Pr0wler wrote: It shows the state of SC2 in Korea(and in general). The coach and the players of a team competing in the elite league are forced to fix matches just to not starve. And they did it for peanuts... 5k a game... I doubt that Gerrard, Yoda or B4 will go in jail for that. If anything they are actually making a favor to Yoda. He is still young and can still go to university and get a decent life outside of eSports.
In regards of the match-fixing itself. To think that this will stop it, is like to think that match-fixing in BW stopped after the Savior scandal. It will never end. The more developed the scene is, the more match-fixing there will be. In football people fix matches in the kids leagues...
Yo, poor Gerrard starving. He spent >50k USD for his own gambling. Totally starving.
|
On October 19 2015 21:16 KrazyTrumpet wrote:Show nested quote +On October 19 2015 21:09 Penev wrote:On October 19 2015 21:00 KrazyTrumpet wrote:On October 19 2015 20:30 DJHelium wrote:On October 19 2015 20:29 Penev wrote:On October 19 2015 20:21 lichter wrote: The fact that fixers passed on false fixes makes Pinnacle and other third party (in that they were not the main sites used for betting) betting sites useless as evidence. Their voided bets essentially mean nothing because of confirmation bias. Anyone who keeps referring to the voided bets is delusional especially since the proven fixes were mostly not voided. Any reference to Pinnacle as evidence will be judged harshly. Where can I find this? I'm apparently blind to this information. :-S https://twitter.com/SaintSnorlax/status/655978939467350016https://twitter.com/SaintSnorlax/status/655979351440236544 This is exactly why you can't use betting lines as "incontrovertible proof." Numbers and statistics can say literally anything you want them to. You can't. These voided matches are still suspect though. Suspect to being either falsely or "genuinely" fixed. Either way they indicated that something was wrong. But they were never *ever* "100% proof" that the players in question were matchmaking. Too many people around here saw bets being voided, and immediately jumped to the conclusion that the only rational reason is because Players X and/or Y DEFINITELY match fixed. Turns out, not the case! True, true. I wonder if anything else will come up due to this investigation though. It seems unlikely to me that only 5 matches were fixed and at least 7 "fake" fixed.
On October 19 2015 21:21 wjat wrote: Looks like the force won't be on Yoda's side today. Don't underestimate the dark side of the force
meh :/
|
This is horrible, Gerrard sucha douchebag. Now I understand why ByuN disappeared, his manager stole and sold his computer I wouldn't want to have anything to do with that team either.
Regarding the betting lines, people report some matchfixers that were sold by the brokers were fake and thats why there are so many betting lines that are suspicous. We got 5 different games featuring two different players that are reported as matchfixed, there has to be more. The reason is that if the brokers sold matchifixes for 7 different players games and only two of those players actually matchfixed..... Why the heck would the "Investors" keep trusting the brokers? seelings fake matchfixes is something you can pull off maybe 1/5 without risking that that everyone will stop trusting you or that someone will actually break your neck for cheating them. If you work with illegal gambling your credibility is your livelihood and foolish the wrong people can end up badly. No one would sell fake matchfixes more than real ones, it would be incredibly stupid.
There has to be more matchfixes out there, time will tell hopefully.
|
On October 19 2015 21:05 Excludos wrote:Show nested quote +On October 19 2015 20:30 pure.Wasted wrote:On October 19 2015 20:21 Excludos wrote:On October 19 2015 20:16 pure.Wasted wrote:On October 19 2015 20:08 Excludos wrote:On October 19 2015 20:05 pure.Wasted wrote:On October 19 2015 19:56 Poopfeast wrote:
innocent until proven is not limited to law. Actually, yeah, it is. Send some explicitly sexual text messages to someone you could theoretically be attracted to, then leave your phone in a place where your significant other will easily find it. Let's see how innocent they think you are, let's see how many cold, hard facts they need to persuade them that you're a scumbag. That's not illegal tho, so your point is pointless.. It's OK to come to conclusions about people, so long as it's not about stuff that's legal or illegal? Come again? Who I consider guilty of what, in my own mind, is my own prerogative. I'm hoping this is ok to discuss since we've moved away from naming individuals and over to the actual ethics of doing it: Of course you can come up with your own conclusions, it's practically impossible not to. However there is a big difference between leaving a girl because you found out that she cheated on you, and running up and down the streets telling people to get their pitchforks because you saw some blood on your neighbour's porch. The line is pretty much drawn at the point we're talking about criminality. In your hypothetical analogy, the accused is in grave physical danger. In the reality that we find ourselves now, there is no danger to any pro accused of match-fixing by random TL members, be it physical or otherwise. The ability of Western slander to impact a Korean playing in Korea, even if we somehow pooled all our malice into the effort, is simply non-existent. I don't censor my very strong opinion precisely because I know how little weight it carries. (Again, theoretically. In practice, I do censor my opinion because I enjoy my posting privileges.) The problem is that it does. If enough people band togheter to blame an individual, it ruins his reputation (at least in the west). This is exactly why it's important to refrain from pitchforking people who haven't been convicted. Suspicions are fine, accusing is not. So please, for the love of esports, stop.
You haven't really addressed my point, which is that reputation is meaningless. WCS is essentially region-locked, which means that, with the very dubious exception of DRG who I don't know what the fuck it is he thinks he's trying to do, Koreans aren't looking to land foreign teams anymore. So we can't impact that. And all of the foreign tournaments that Koreans attend have some sort of qualifiers stage; only a few have invitational spots besides (HSC). So we can't really impact their chances to attend/win, either.
I guess we could impact stream viewership numbers? So if every pro streamed, and streaming was a very lucrative form of player earnings, this would be a big deal, I guess? But they don't... so it's not?
The only legitimate negative consequence of throwing accusations around without proof is that we risk breeding a culture of negativity and hostility... which is a very fair concern, and it totally explains TL's policy. At the same time, you have to admit that accusations of match-fixing have so far remained localized to the players we have some legitimate reason to wonder about. You always hear the same name(s) brought up over and over, it's not hipster accusations coming in and out of fashion on a weekly basis. So even the most unreasonable people have been, on the whole, quite reasonable.
|
Well, game fixing is a part of every professional sport, so no wonder people do it. I only wonder why are they doing it so dumb. With so many people involved it's bound to fail. If I was a progamer and I wanted to make some $ on the side, I'd tell my mom or brother or closest friend to make some account and bet on the opponent's victory and then cash in. And no abuse, like maybe in 5% of the games. And no weird purchases too. Gotta act like you have no money on the side. With so many unknown people in the scheme, I find it ridiculous they actually agree to do it.
|
Anyone saying there is conclusive proof that the remaining voided bet matches conclusively weren't fixed are delusional, we have no way to know what investigations are taking place beyond the scenes, this particular investigation was related to Prime's coach, players and the other people involved but there is no knowing whether separate match fixing syndicates exist/existed.
The other voided matches are suspicious, and worthy of investigation, and people can draw their own conclusions what the circumstantial evidence means or does not mean. We may never find out, or we could end up with the actual results of a real and independent investigation or anything in between.
|
On October 19 2015 21:00 Pr0wler wrote: It shows the state of SC2 in Korea(and in general). The coach and the players of a team competing in the elite league are forced to fix matches just to not starve. And they did it for peanuts... 5k a game... I doubt that Gerrard, Yoda or B4 will go in jail for that. If anything they are actually making a favor to Yoda. He is still young and can still go to university and get a decent life outside of eSports.
In regards of the match-fixing itself. To think that this will stop it, is like to think that match-fixing in BW stopped after the Savior scandal. It will never end. The more developed the scene is, the more match-fixing there will be. In football people fix matches in the kids leagues...
good points here in this post. the best way to discourage match fixing is to have very highly paid players and officials.
"The Fix" by Declan Hill shows that match fixing is possible for any competitive event and all one can do is minimize it.
The irony here is that Vince Mcmahon's WWE is more honest than any of these competitive events that turn out to have match fixing. I wonder if players have gone a step further than merely fixing a final result. I wonder if the desire to entertain a TV audience has led players to engage in choreographed combat sequences that look spectacular to the viewer. Doing stuff like that puts it up there with professional wrestling.
|
Yoda :3... Love the player... Those kind of news are just so disappointting. :'(
|
sc2 did not fucking need this jesus christ
YoDa from IM and Prime?
|
This kind of crap killed brood war at a time when when it was in a much better position than sc2...
|
On October 19 2015 21:26 pure.Wasted wrote:Show nested quote +On October 19 2015 21:05 Excludos wrote:On October 19 2015 20:30 pure.Wasted wrote:On October 19 2015 20:21 Excludos wrote:On October 19 2015 20:16 pure.Wasted wrote:On October 19 2015 20:08 Excludos wrote:On October 19 2015 20:05 pure.Wasted wrote:On October 19 2015 19:56 Poopfeast wrote:
innocent until proven is not limited to law. Actually, yeah, it is. Send some explicitly sexual text messages to someone you could theoretically be attracted to, then leave your phone in a place where your significant other will easily find it. Let's see how innocent they think you are, let's see how many cold, hard facts they need to persuade them that you're a scumbag. That's not illegal tho, so your point is pointless.. It's OK to come to conclusions about people, so long as it's not about stuff that's legal or illegal? Come again? Who I consider guilty of what, in my own mind, is my own prerogative. I'm hoping this is ok to discuss since we've moved away from naming individuals and over to the actual ethics of doing it: Of course you can come up with your own conclusions, it's practically impossible not to. However there is a big difference between leaving a girl because you found out that she cheated on you, and running up and down the streets telling people to get their pitchforks because you saw some blood on your neighbour's porch. The line is pretty much drawn at the point we're talking about criminality. In your hypothetical analogy, the accused is in grave physical danger. In the reality that we find ourselves now, there is no danger to any pro accused of match-fixing by random TL members, be it physical or otherwise. The ability of Western slander to impact a Korean playing in Korea, even if we somehow pooled all our malice into the effort, is simply non-existent. I don't censor my very strong opinion precisely because I know how little weight it carries. (Again, theoretically. In practice, I do censor my opinion because I enjoy my posting privileges.) The problem is that it does. If enough people band togheter to blame an individual, it ruins his reputation (at least in the west). This is exactly why it's important to refrain from pitchforking people who haven't been convicted. Suspicions are fine, accusing is not. So please, for the love of esports, stop. You haven't really addressed my point, which is that reputation is meaningless. WCS is essentially region-locked, which means that, with the very dubious exception of DRG who I don't know what the fuck it is he thinks he's trying to do, Koreans aren't looking to land foreign teams anymore. So we can't impact that. And all of the foreign tournaments that Koreans attend have some sort of qualifiers stage; only a few have invitational spots besides (HSC). So we can't really impact their chances to attend/win, either. I guess we could impact stream viewership numbers? So if every pro streamed, and streaming was a very lucrative form of player earnings, this would be a big deal, I guess? But they don't... so it's not? The only legitimate negative consequence of throwing accusations around without proof is that we risk breeding a culture of negativity and hostility... which is a very fair concern, and it totally explains TL's policy. At the same time, you have to admit that accusations of match-fixing have so far remained localized to the players we have some legitimate reason to wonder about. You always hear the same name(s) brought up over and over, it's not hipster accusations coming in and out of fashion on a weekly basis. So even the most unreasonable people have been, on the whole, quite reasonable.
So if a player who is a suspected match fixer (but is not found guilty), you think it's completely ok to absolutely just ruin his reputation? What if that player wants to join an american team? Who would have him? Any western sponsors? Forget about it. He might be ok continuing exactly what he's doing on the team he's on, but his future outside of korea is non-existent. Then there's the proximity factor. People here knows people in Korea, some even live there. If enough of them start thinking someone is match fixing, they will tell their Korean friends, and it just spreads from there. Its all bad all the time. Reputation is -everything- in this sport. If your reputation is bad, your career is dead.
You must realize I don't disagree with the accusations people have mentioned earlier. I have my suspicions as well, and the chances based on rumors and findings are rather high. The problem is that they're not 100%, and as long as there is even a tiny chance that someone can still be innocent, its important to not completely drive his reputation through the mud. Too many times (in other esports as well, cs:go comes to mind for a recent event) innocent players have their reputations dragged through the mud for weeks before they're found completely innocent. This is not ok.
|
|
|
|