GOM switches free quality of GSL back to low - Page 24
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Penev
28440 Posts
| ||
swissman777
1106 Posts
I really hope that they get better fast. But I am pretty sure tastosis can still do the same style of casting as them with better performance and that was the point in my argument. | ||
Suichoy
Canada397 Posts
| ||
cheekymonkey
France1387 Posts
Riot. And don't take your anger out on Tastosis.... What a sad thread. | ||
deacon.frost
Czech Republic12128 Posts
On June 12 2015 07:03 Penev wrote: Moonglade is indeed a GM on the Korean ladder (and I believe Valdes is a Korean diamond). Just noting on yesterdays game from S*L(Stats vs Classic) where both commentators missed 2 blocked colossi behind buildings which probably cost the game. Both went on and on about concave fight. One of them was Moonglade ![]() ![]() ![]() And I don't want to say Moonglade is bad caster. He's excellent when ZvX is going on(maybe the best). But man, when there's no Zerg involved he's a lot of time wrong too. And I am talking about PvX mostly, because I play Protoss and see(hear) what he's talking about and laugh for myself from time to time. And I will repeat it one more time - he's not bad. He's actually pretty good, I would put him probably as #3 on my list today, he improved a lot. But he should be more careful about other races, I think Artosis is doing the same so his lack of knowledge is not that obvious. (and again and again - Moonglade is GM player - his lack of knowledge is so small it's laughable to talk about, but it is there) Also, as someone mentioned - their off topic is actually pretty good and will fade away in LotV. I love more the casting when they are not saying obvious things because I can see it. It's not a radio, duh ![]() I think that in the future Wolf/Valdez/Moonglade will be better than Tastosis, they improved a lot(which is not weird because they cast a lot ![]() | ||
Penev
28440 Posts
On June 12 2015 18:16 deacon.frost wrote: Just noting on yesterdays game from S*L(Stats vs Classic) where both commentators missed 2 blocked colossi behind buildings which probably cost the game. Both went on and on about concave fight. One of them was Moonglade ![]() ![]() ![]() And I don't want to say Moonglade is bad caster. He's excellent when ZvX is going on(maybe the best). But man, when there's no Zerg involved he's a lot of time wrong too. And I am talking about PvX mostly, because I play Protoss and see(hear) what he's talking about and laugh for myself from time to time. And I will repeat it one more time - he's not bad. He's actually pretty good, I would put him probably as #3 on my list today, he improved a lot. But he should be more careful about other races, I think Artosis is doing the same so his lack of knowledge is not that obvious. (and again and again - Moonglade is GM player - his lack of knowledge is so small it's laughable to talk about, but it is there) Also, as someone mentioned - their off topic is actually pretty good and will fade away in LotV. I love more the casting when they are not saying obvious things because I can see it. It's not a radio, duh ![]() I think that in the future Wolf/Valdez/Moonglade will be better than Tastosis, they improved a lot(which is not weird because they cast a lot ![]() Cursing the curser, nice! Yeah, all of them make mistakes from time to time. If you've been commentating for ours than that is bound to happen. I feel people are oftentimes way too critical about it. I actually like all five of them. And I like variety, some people are really stuck at trying to determine "the best" for everything. | ||
negativedge
4279 Posts
On June 12 2015 16:19 cheekymonkey wrote: A company wants to make money off their product, and not give a free alternative to their customers. Riot. And don't take your anger out on Tastosis.... What a sad thread. and they aren't going to make any money doing this. if it isn't working, they need to find a new business model, because giving everyone garbage quality and forcing a paywall on twitch, where they are, oh, literally the only entity in gaming doing this, simply won't get it done. blizzard had the opportunity when this game was big to step in and subsidize/unify the esports aspect of it, like Riot did, but by the time they figured that out they were way too late and then they basically gave up. now GOM has to do it on their own, in a market where their old strategy simply is no longer viable, and the game is far less popular than it was back in 2011. at best they just have their head in the sand. | ||
effecto
France142 Posts
![]() I hope this isn't the slow death of GSL! | ||
True_Spike
Poland3410 Posts
| ||
sparklewolf
65 Posts
it's fine stop whining you greedy entitled little shits. pay up or fuck off. User was temp banned for this post. | ||
TRaFFiC
Canada1448 Posts
On June 12 2015 07:10 swissman777 wrote: That's great because I still remember Valdes and Moonglade not remembering a match that happened just days before and that really was not good. I really hope that they get better fast. But I am pretty sure tastosis can still do the same style of casting as them with better performance and that was the point in my argument. I wouldn't call it an argument. It's your opinion. My favorite Korean duo is Valdes and Moonglade. As far as skill goes, Moonglade is the only one who streams as far as I know. The rest might be in bronze for all we know. | ||
swissman777
1106 Posts
On June 12 2015 19:39 TRaFFiC wrote: I wouldn't call it an argument. It's your opinion. My favorite Korean duo is Valdes and Moonglade. As far as skill goes, Moonglade is the only one who streams as far as I know. The rest might be in bronze for all we know. I was writing paragraphs and paragraphs on why tastosis is still better than the other three at this moment. I was stating my reasons for my opinion, which qualifies as an argument. | ||
TRaFFiC
Canada1448 Posts
On June 12 2015 19:50 swissman777 wrote: I was writing paragraphs and paragraphs on why tastosis is still better than the other three at this moment. I was stating my reasons for my opinion, which qualifies as an argument. That is admittedly true. Though, imo, this is akin to arguing over whether blue or green is better. Pointless. | ||
Penev
28440 Posts
On June 12 2015 19:59 TRaFFiC wrote: That is admittedly true. Though, imo, this is akin to arguing over whether blue or green is better. Pointless. Blue ofc. Sheesh | ||
swissman777
1106 Posts
On June 12 2015 19:59 TRaFFiC wrote: That is admittedly true. Though, imo, this is akin to arguing over whether blue or green is better. Pointless. Please do give me at least two reasons why it's pointless. It's hard to believe you otherwise. | ||
Vorenius
Denmark1979 Posts
Please. Green is the color of nature and spring. Symbolizing growth and fertility. Also, green man: go. Blue is color of cold. And being sad. | ||
deth2munkies
United States4051 Posts
They are mistaken. They no longer have a monopoly on high level Korean starcraft and, quite frankly, no longer deliver a superior product to their competitors. It's time for them to change or die, and this is not the right change. | ||
Penev
28440 Posts
On June 12 2015 20:20 Vorenius wrote: Please. Green is the color of nature and spring. Symbolizing growth and fertility. Also, green man: go. Blue is color of cold. And being sad. All these years I supported the wrong color D: | ||
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
| ||
isparavanje
62 Posts
| ||
| ||