| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Elentos
55553 Posts
On June 11 2015 06:08 Darthsanta13 wrote: Is SSL also broadcast on TV? I was under the impression that they were online only, and they don't have to stream only in low. SSL is on TV, yes. | ||
BisuDagger
Bisutopia19257 Posts
On June 11 2015 06:08 Darthsanta13 wrote: Is SSL also broadcast on TV? I was under the impression that they were online only, and they don't have to stream only in low. Forgot to mention that. SSL is ogn and sbenu backed iirc so big money.  | ||
|
Elentos
55553 Posts
On June 11 2015 07:09 BisuDagger wrote: Forgot to mention that. SSL is ogn and sbenu backed iirc so big money. SSL is SPOTV, afaik OGN has nothing to do with it. Also both SC2 Starleagues are sponsored by SBENU. | ||
|
BisuDagger
Bisutopia19257 Posts
On June 11 2015 07:37 Elentos wrote: SSL is SPOTV, afaik OGN has nothing to do with it. Also both SC2 Starleagues are sponsored by SBENU. Lol. I know nothing about the sponsors then. Ignore my previous comments :D | ||
|
Cascade
Australia5405 Posts
The income from adds on twitch must be ridiculously low, seeing how few hours per month they stream, and how little you get per viewer per hour. On June 11 2015 04:14 ZeromuS wrote: My main question related to this is how can so many other streams offer things for free without using the "low" quality bait as it were. Is GOM the only one willing to take this stance, or are they operating so much less efficiently than the other companies that they need to do this? I think they are the only ones doing it because they are the only ones that can do it successfully. I think any tournament would do it if they would get as many subscribers as gom. But they wouldn't, so they stick to what they can get, which is some sponsor and then trying to get as many free viewers they can to report back to the sponsors. | ||
|
showstealer1829
Australia3123 Posts
On June 11 2015 04:59 mikumegurine wrote: Tastetosis cant be paid less, they have families to support besides, they are the SUPERSTARS of this industry everything should revolve around them you dont give Lebron James a paycut, you give him whatever he wants Tastetosis are the king Except like Lebron this season. They've been carried by Matthew Dellevadova (Moonglade/Wolf/Valdes/Whoever they've brought in when Tastosis aren't available) | ||
|
Cluster__
United States328 Posts
| ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20301 Posts
On June 11 2015 01:35 schaf wrote: meh... bad move. This screams to me "we don't want to expand our foreign audience, we just need it to pay for the stream so we can focus on Korea." Which is a fine statement, we are just on the wrong sides of the border. :D /sarcasm Remember that it is not "buy this or we cut the English stream completely", since they can't do that if they want to stay an important WCS event. Wasn't a requirement for WCS to have a certain quality stream? | ||
|
Growiel
Korea (South)363 Posts
On June 11 2015 10:33 Cyro wrote: Wasn't a requirement for WCS to have a certain quality stream? Once again, GSL is special and does not follow the same rules. | ||
|
Kevin_Sorbo
Canada3217 Posts
On June 11 2015 08:36 Cascade wrote: First, can we stop referring to people viewing the stream for free with ad block as customers. anyone watching ( hence comsuming their product ) is a cutomer imo. | ||
|
LarJarsE
United States1378 Posts
| ||
|
deth
Australia1757 Posts
On June 11 2015 11:06 Kevin_Sorbo wrote: anyone watching ( hence comsuming their product ) is a cutomer imo. Exactly, there's a bunch of ads in the stream itself. Adblock/twitch adrevenue is irrelevant for a company the size of GOM. | ||
|
NyxNax
United States227 Posts
Starcraft 2 seems to be holding its own, but it feels fragile. I don't see this helping GSL gain more viewership, just milking what it has. It might work in the short run but I don't see it helping in the long. Starleague on the other hand seems to be gaining a lot more popularity and to me seems like a much better business plan. | ||
|
datguy
5 Posts
| ||
|
schaf
Germany1326 Posts
On June 11 2015 10:33 Cyro wrote: Wasn't a requirement for WCS to have a certain quality stream? They somehow bypassed it with a deal with Blizzard I assume. But Bliz won't tolerate them shutting out English viewers, that would be outright stupid. | ||
|
Aeromi
France14460 Posts
On June 11 2015 10:33 Cyro wrote: Wasn't a requirement for WCS to have a certain quality stream? No, GSL and SSL are allowed not to follow WCS handbook 2015. | ||
|
maartendq
Belgium3115 Posts
On June 11 2015 05:45 Clbull wrote: I think the truth is that the entire SC2 scene is unprofitable without a freemium or PPV-based viewing model, which is what Blizzard should consider when reforming the game and its scene. See for example: The demise of MLG, IPL, NASL and the fact that WCS is most likely an unprofitable loss-leader for a game that only makes its money from box sales unlike LoL, DOTA 2 or SMITE. I think MLG experimented with a PPV model for SC2 a while ago but I don't think it turned out as well as they hoped. | ||
|
-Archangel-
Croatia7457 Posts
On June 11 2015 17:15 maartendq wrote: I think MLG experimented with a PPV model for SC2 a while ago but I don't think it turned out as well as they hoped. Sc2 does have that many idiots that will pay big bucks to watch 2 minute boxing matches... | ||
|
winadil
74 Posts
| ||
|
Baarn
United States2702 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
RSL Revival
Maestros of the Game
BSL Team Wars
Afreeca Starleague
Snow vs Sharp
Jaedong vs Mini
Wardi Open
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Afreeca Starleague
Light vs Speed
Larva vs Soma
LiuLi Cup
The PondCast
Korean StarCraft League
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
