On January 09 2015 20:20 RHoudini wrote:
You can use Hola to get around the region-block.
You can use Hola to get around the region-block.
Thanks a bunch!!
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Frankenberry
Denmark302 Posts
On January 09 2015 20:20 RHoudini wrote: Show nested quote + On January 09 2015 20:17 Frankenberry wrote: On January 09 2015 20:17 RHoudini wrote: On January 09 2015 20:11 Penev wrote: On January 09 2015 19:45 RHoudini wrote: You can always watch the Youtube (Korean) video. If you get a region-block (as I do), there are browser extensions like Hola http://hola.org/ that allow you to proxy around the world (pretend that you're viewing from Korea). Thanks but it's says their server is down.. Edit: *Korean I'm currently watching the Youtube stream, everything seems to work fine. link please ![]() You can use Hola to get around the region-block. Thanks a bunch!! | ||
RHoudini
Belgium3627 Posts
On January 09 2015 20:28 Clonester wrote: Maybe Europe to Korea is still such a bad connection. I'm watching flawless 720p live from Belgium. | ||
Frankenberry
Denmark302 Posts
On January 09 2015 20:44 RHoudini wrote: Show nested quote + On January 09 2015 20:28 Clonester wrote: Maybe Europe to Korea is still such a bad connection. I'm watching flawless 720p live from Belgium. I have no problem watching HD stream from denmark aswell ![]() | ||
sparklyresidue
United States5523 Posts
| ||
Penev
28474 Posts
On January 09 2015 20:44 RHoudini wrote: Show nested quote + On January 09 2015 20:28 Clonester wrote: Maybe Europe to Korea is still such a bad connection. I'm watching flawless 720p live from Belgium. From the Netherlands it sucks.. ![]() | ||
Defessus
United States164 Posts
This will result in further erosion of their customer base. I myself am used to spending 105$+ per year on GOMTV for the past 4 years. I will not be spending 150$+ a year. I will now not be sad when GOMTV closes its doors in a year or two. EDIT: 13.99 per season? This is closer to last years, i'll think over the purchase. | ||
nkr
Sweden5451 Posts
On January 09 2015 21:00 Defessus wrote: 13.99$ a month and only low quality means they are losing more customer and are attempting to compensate by raising their prices. This will result in further erosion of their customer base. I myself am used to spending 105$+ per year on GOMTV for the past 4 years. I will not be spending 150$+ a year. I will now not be sad when GOMTV closes its doors in a year or two. But if the previous model wasn't viable then they'd close doors sooner than that. It seems a lot of people assume they were doing fine and did this just because they're greedy and want to fuck with you. | ||
Defessus
United States164 Posts
On January 09 2015 21:04 nkr wrote: Show nested quote + On January 09 2015 21:00 Defessus wrote: 13.99$ a month and only low quality means they are losing more customer and are attempting to compensate by raising their prices. This will result in further erosion of their customer base. I myself am used to spending 105$+ per year on GOMTV for the past 4 years. I will not be spending 150$+ a year. I will now not be sad when GOMTV closes its doors in a year or two. But if the previous model wasn't viable then they'd close doors sooner than that. It seems a lot of people assume they were doing fine and did this just because they're greedy and want to fuck with you. If a company needs more money they have a lot of options. Raising prices on existing customers is only one of them. Not the best option in my opinion either. | ||
nkr
Sweden5451 Posts
On January 09 2015 21:07 Defessus wrote: Show nested quote + On January 09 2015 21:04 nkr wrote: On January 09 2015 21:00 Defessus wrote: 13.99$ a month and only low quality means they are losing more customer and are attempting to compensate by raising their prices. This will result in further erosion of their customer base. I myself am used to spending 105$+ per year on GOMTV for the past 4 years. I will not be spending 150$+ a year. I will now not be sad when GOMTV closes its doors in a year or two. But if the previous model wasn't viable then they'd close doors sooner than that. It seems a lot of people assume they were doing fine and did this just because they're greedy and want to fuck with you. If a company needs more money they have a lot of options. Raising prices on existing customers is only one of them. Not the best option in my opinion either. We've seen them struggle to land sponsorships in the past. I think they've exhausted other options. | ||
imre
France9263 Posts
On January 09 2015 21:09 nkr wrote: Show nested quote + On January 09 2015 21:07 Defessus wrote: On January 09 2015 21:04 nkr wrote: On January 09 2015 21:00 Defessus wrote: 13.99$ a month and only low quality means they are losing more customer and are attempting to compensate by raising their prices. This will result in further erosion of their customer base. I myself am used to spending 105$+ per year on GOMTV for the past 4 years. I will not be spending 150$+ a year. I will now not be sad when GOMTV closes its doors in a year or two. But if the previous model wasn't viable then they'd close doors sooner than that. It seems a lot of people assume they were doing fine and did this just because they're greedy and want to fuck with you. If a company needs more money they have a lot of options. Raising prices on existing customers is only one of them. Not the best option in my opinion either. We've seen them struggle to land sponsorships in the past. I think they've exhausted other options. the problem for me is more the lack of communication than anything else. Done like that it looks just like a dick move. | ||
Penev
28474 Posts
On January 09 2015 21:11 sAsImre wrote: Show nested quote + On January 09 2015 21:09 nkr wrote: On January 09 2015 21:07 Defessus wrote: On January 09 2015 21:04 nkr wrote: On January 09 2015 21:00 Defessus wrote: 13.99$ a month and only low quality means they are losing more customer and are attempting to compensate by raising their prices. This will result in further erosion of their customer base. I myself am used to spending 105$+ per year on GOMTV for the past 4 years. I will not be spending 150$+ a year. I will now not be sad when GOMTV closes its doors in a year or two. But if the previous model wasn't viable then they'd close doors sooner than that. It seems a lot of people assume they were doing fine and did this just because they're greedy and want to fuck with you. If a company needs more money they have a lot of options. Raising prices on existing customers is only one of them. Not the best option in my opinion either. We've seen them struggle to land sponsorships in the past. I think they've exhausted other options. the problem for me is more the lack of communication than anything else. Done like that it looks just like a dick move. Indeed. | ||
Ramiz1989
12124 Posts
On January 09 2015 21:11 sAsImre wrote: Show nested quote + On January 09 2015 21:09 nkr wrote: On January 09 2015 21:07 Defessus wrote: On January 09 2015 21:04 nkr wrote: On January 09 2015 21:00 Defessus wrote: 13.99$ a month and only low quality means they are losing more customer and are attempting to compensate by raising their prices. This will result in further erosion of their customer base. I myself am used to spending 105$+ per year on GOMTV for the past 4 years. I will not be spending 150$+ a year. I will now not be sad when GOMTV closes its doors in a year or two. But if the previous model wasn't viable then they'd close doors sooner than that. It seems a lot of people assume they were doing fine and did this just because they're greedy and want to fuck with you. If a company needs more money they have a lot of options. Raising prices on existing customers is only one of them. Not the best option in my opinion either. We've seen them struggle to land sponsorships in the past. I think they've exhausted other options. the problem for me is more the lack of communication than anything else. Done like that it looks just like a dick move. It doesn't just look like a dick move, it is a dick move. | ||
imre
France9263 Posts
On January 09 2015 21:12 Ramiz1989 wrote: Show nested quote + On January 09 2015 21:11 sAsImre wrote: On January 09 2015 21:09 nkr wrote: On January 09 2015 21:07 Defessus wrote: On January 09 2015 21:04 nkr wrote: On January 09 2015 21:00 Defessus wrote: 13.99$ a month and only low quality means they are losing more customer and are attempting to compensate by raising their prices. This will result in further erosion of their customer base. I myself am used to spending 105$+ per year on GOMTV for the past 4 years. I will not be spending 150$+ a year. I will now not be sad when GOMTV closes its doors in a year or two. But if the previous model wasn't viable then they'd close doors sooner than that. It seems a lot of people assume they were doing fine and did this just because they're greedy and want to fuck with you. If a company needs more money they have a lot of options. Raising prices on existing customers is only one of them. Not the best option in my opinion either. We've seen them struggle to land sponsorships in the past. I think they've exhausted other options. the problem for me is more the lack of communication than anything else. Done like that it looks just like a dick move. It doesn't just look like a dick move, it is a dick move. It depends how badly things were working before, it can be seen as necessary but done like that... | ||
nkr
Sweden5451 Posts
| ||
Ramiz1989
12124 Posts
On January 09 2015 21:13 sAsImre wrote: Show nested quote + On January 09 2015 21:12 Ramiz1989 wrote: On January 09 2015 21:11 sAsImre wrote: On January 09 2015 21:09 nkr wrote: On January 09 2015 21:07 Defessus wrote: On January 09 2015 21:04 nkr wrote: On January 09 2015 21:00 Defessus wrote: 13.99$ a month and only low quality means they are losing more customer and are attempting to compensate by raising their prices. This will result in further erosion of their customer base. I myself am used to spending 105$+ per year on GOMTV for the past 4 years. I will not be spending 150$+ a year. I will now not be sad when GOMTV closes its doors in a year or two. But if the previous model wasn't viable then they'd close doors sooner than that. It seems a lot of people assume they were doing fine and did this just because they're greedy and want to fuck with you. If a company needs more money they have a lot of options. Raising prices on existing customers is only one of them. Not the best option in my opinion either. We've seen them struggle to land sponsorships in the past. I think they've exhausted other options. the problem for me is more the lack of communication than anything else. Done like that it looks just like a dick move. It doesn't just look like a dick move, it is a dick move. It depends how badly things were working before, it can be seen as necessary but done like that... It doesn't matter, lack of communication is disgusting. Luckily we had Seeker who has asked GOM about it and we got confirmation that from now on low is for non-subs, if Seeker didn't do that, who knows when we would get the answer. They've made mistakes before and were giving us source quality for free sometimes, and a lot of people thought that this is a mistake... On January 09 2015 21:17 nkr wrote: What exactly did you want them to tell you? "Hey our business is not successful atm, we're gna take away something that was previously free. Enjoy." It would change nothing. You know, announcement would be good for start. | ||
imre
France9263 Posts
On January 09 2015 21:17 nkr wrote: What exactly did you want them to tell you? "Hey our business is not successful atm, we're gna take away something that was previously free. Enjoy." It would change nothing. just a standard PR statement that they were switching things up (because whatever). and not being like that: launching stream, oh it's on low, back to medium at least. What sub needed for medium and 13.99$/month that's fucking ridiculous. + twitch and GSL has been such a downgrad for vods so the live quality was pretty much the only reason to sub. | ||
brickrd
United States4894 Posts
guess for as long as the game stays active they just want to milk the hell out of the small niche of hardcore fans who will pay for SC2 content? kinda disappointing, but capitalism is what it is On January 09 2015 21:17 nkr wrote: What exactly did you want them to tell you? "Hey our business is not successful atm, we're gna take away something that was previously free. Enjoy." It would change nothing. so if your friend cancels lunch plans with you it doesn't matter whether he texts you first? ![]() | ||
nkr
Sweden5451 Posts
| ||
neptunusfisk
2286 Posts
| ||
brickrd
United States4894 Posts
On January 09 2015 21:23 nkr wrote: that's not even remotely the same, but a funny scenario indeed! i'm not sure what's different about it. the whole point is to give people notice of a change that will disappoint them as a basic courtesy so they're not taken off guard by it? it's actually almost identical | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Bisu Dota 2![]() Jaedong ![]() Flash ![]() EffOrt ![]() Hyuk ![]() Soulkey ![]() Stork ![]() ZerO ![]() Larva ![]() Snow ![]() [ Show more ] League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games hiko1815 B2W.Neo917 Beastyqt674 crisheroes450 Lowko354 ArmadaUGS149 Liquid`VortiX143 Trikslyr22 ZerO(Twitch)20 Organizations Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • Reevou StarCraft: Brood War![]() ![]() • intothetv ![]() • AfreecaTV YouTube • Kozan • IndyKCrew ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • Migwel ![]() • sooper7s Dota 2 League of Legends |
RotterdaM Event
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV European League
MaNa vs sebesdes
Mixu vs Fjant
ByuN vs HeRoMaRinE
ShoWTimE vs goblin
Gerald vs Babymarine
Krystianer vs YoungYakov
PiGosaur Monday
The PondCast
WardiTV European League
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
[ Show More ] Replay Cast
RSL Revival
Classic vs Cure
FEL
RSL Revival
FEL
FEL
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
RSL Revival
FEL
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
|
|