Great Games Episode One: Starcraft II - Page 2
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Zerste
United States112 Posts
| ||
KaiserJohan
Sweden1808 Posts
| ||
Kazahk
United States385 Posts
| ||
genericname92
United States148 Posts
| ||
SuperHofmann
Italy1741 Posts
Jaedong: WOOOOOOOOOOOOOO vs Flash: WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO then... HerO vs Puma: ??????????????????????? no Mvp? Nestea? MarineKing? or maybe... Stephano(for a europe focus)? But of course, it is great. I hope to see more of this! | ||
Gamegene
United States8308 Posts
On November 30 2014 05:48 sigm wrote: A solid 20+ minutes of circlejerking, questionable choice for SC2 focus, an overly sappy "ending", no mention of people like Bisu, Savior, Boxer for SC or MC, Mvp, Nestea for SC2, and rather sparse interviews. For a first episode, I suppose it's excusable, as many TV pilot episodes also lack in quality when compared to regular episodes. But if this is supposed to turn into a noteworthy documentary series, then there's much work to be done. i think you're confusing the aims of this content to the smash bros documentary. remember this is the story of R A Z E R B O Y Z not SC2. | ||
sigm
192 Posts
On November 30 2014 07:21 Liquid`Nazgul wrote: You are really tough to please if that's what you think after watching. This is one of the better pieces of content I have seen done about StarCraft and it didn't even need a kickstarter. I'm not really that tough to please, as the things that I think are wrong with the SC episode are rather obvious, instead of being some arbitrary nitpicks. The whole episode just feels like someone had an idea to do another recap of the Flash/Jaedong rivalry and then tossed in whatever other bits of almost randomly chosen info in there to make it about SC in general, including the Hero focus and the whole 30 seconds of info about the game itself. I mean, no offense, but I think there are more worthwhile players for a documentary in the SC2 scene than Hero, and the obvious SC bias of the whole thing doesn't help either. I know that SC was the more important, influential, and popular of the two games in South Korea, which is apparently all that matters in the world of SC, but that doesn't mean that a documentary should skimp on SC2 as it did, as documentaries should be unbiased, objective, and thorough. On November 30 2014 08:41 kuresuti wrote: It's not even 30 minutes long. How are you proposing they should have done it? For starters, they should've made it 60 minutes long, at least. This isn't a TV show, so I don't see a reason to limit the running time to 25 minutes. That way, they could've dedicated half an hour to each game, and that would've given them enough time to properly introduce and explain each game, talk about the history and current status, show some actual interviews, and do a proper coverage of the most important players. I mean, the next two episodes will be covering a single subject as well, but they're giving an episode each to a separate game. Why couldn't SC get the same treatment? | ||
boxerfred
Germany8360 Posts
| ||
TecaNina
41 Posts
Well, however nice episode! User was warned for this post | ||
![]()
Plexa
Aotearoa39261 Posts
On November 30 2014 07:21 Liquid`Nazgul wrote: You are really tough to please if that's what you think after watching. This is one of the better pieces of content I have seen done about StarCraft and it didn't even need a kickstarter. I think there's some rightful criticism to be had here. You're juxtaposing one of the greatest rivalries in all of SC:BW with Hero vs Puma. Now I love Hero vs Puma as a story, and I love Flash vs Jaedong as a story - but the juxtaposition felt really off. (I legitimately thought the second part was going to be about MC when they started talking about a BW dropout). Then you have Yellow[arnc] getting confused with YellOw (how did that get through), BW timelines a little messed up (eg. Flash was the ultimate weapon long before he became God and the majority of JD/Flash would have been tyrant vs ultimate weapon, Flash won GSI before OSL whereas it's implied the reverse and so on). Aside from Artosis and the progamers, the people interviewed were a little questionable (I mean, what did they really add to the film other than a break from the narrator). While a lot better than anything we've had before, there's definitely room for criticism here ![]() | ||
esdf
Croatia736 Posts
| ||
lastride
2390 Posts
![]() | ||
PinoKotsBeer
Netherlands1385 Posts
| ||
eeZe
United States54 Posts
| ||
Cool C
United States69 Posts
| ||
PPN
France248 Posts
| ||
sigm
192 Posts
On December 01 2014 01:28 eeZe wrote: It's cool, it was for a "mainstream" audience not the TL elite... can't that be enough? jeez That's exactly why it needed to be longer, better, and more interesting. I don't think that anyone who wasn't into SC will become so after watching this. | ||
![]()
Clubfan
Germany913 Posts
| ||
nbaker
United States1341 Posts
| ||
vult
United States9400 Posts
Seemed a little rushed on the sc2 side, and had footage used from other films and casts to buffer it. And a lot of jargon. Was better than SOS though. | ||
| ||