• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 19:13
CEST 01:13
KST 08:13
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!9[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Evil Geniuses - shutting down14ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier5Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1[$1250] International ShieldBattery League61Weekly Cups (October 5-11): Farewell to 5.0.167
StarCraft 2
General
No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? REPORT: StarCraft 2: Remastered In Development Evil Geniuses - shutting down How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? Daily SC2 Player Grid - feedback wanted
Tourneys
ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WORTEX Challenger Series — Open SC2 LAN in Budapes
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Sweltering Sands
External Content
Mutation # 548 Shining Bright The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror Mutation # 546 Catch the Train
Brood War
General
Young Players Tournament Announced by SOOP Bot on ladder Starcraft player cRuZa Passed away. Battle.net abbreviations list Do we even care about balance?
Tourneys
[$1250] International ShieldBattery League [BSL23] RO24 Group C Small VOD Thread 2.0 2v2v2v2 Tournament
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) 50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Armies of Exigo - YesYes? General RTS Discussion Thread Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 9411 users

BlizzCon Exhibition Matches - Page 20

Forum Index > SC2 General
392 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 18 19 20 All
ClueClueClue
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
Sweden1203 Posts
November 11 2014 09:40 GMT
#381
The sieged tank harassment seems pretty strong too, unless you have fast and effective anti-air... maybe they could change it so that the attack cooldown is reset when the tanks are unloaded? If there was a little delay between unloading and firing, I think counter-micro would be a lot more effective and the units would work more like a reaver in a shuttle.
Cogito, ergo toss.
Tzyx
Profile Joined August 2010
Northern Ireland281 Posts
November 11 2014 10:50 GMT
#382
Swarm Hosts should spawn larva instead of those mental locusts lol, there'd be a use for them then
ClueClueClue
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
Sweden1203 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-11-11 11:37:22
November 11 2014 11:22 GMT
#383
On November 11 2014 19:50 Tzyx wrote:
Swarm Hosts should spawn larva instead of those mental locusts lol, there'd be a use for them then


This is actually a really cool idea! The host could be a little bit more expensive and work as a portable hatchery, which would make zerg proxied reinforcements a thing. Or maybe you could load it up with already existing units and catapult them out over a wall of forcefields, up a ramp or behind an army to create a surround.
Cogito, ergo toss.
Cloak
Profile Joined October 2009
United States816 Posts
November 11 2014 13:44 GMT
#384
On November 09 2014 06:06 CoraBlue wrote:
Show nested quote +
I'm reluctant on Carrier's future viability, it just sounds great on paper and even if it is broken, it will be the first unit to be reverted to its original form and left to rot. The Immortal verdict is still out but something tells me a "strong passive" changed to a "middling active" might be a nerf, and it's another spell for Protoss which already has to manage so many spellcasters.


The Carrier seems ridiculously good now. Why be reluctant about its viability when it has clearly been buffed? I'm on the fence about Immortals too, but I think overall its a decent change. The only thing that concerns me is that in the changes video, clearly all 4 of those Immortals were going to die. Against what, 6 tanks? If that's true, that's horrible, but I'm willing to wait and see. And Protoss isn't the only race to get new abilities. Herc and Ravager are activated abilities too.

Protoss is already referred to as an a-move race, and while that reputation isn't really deserved, it would be wrong to pretend that another spellcaster is a burden.


The Carrier is also infrequently seen in games due to its inaccessibility and riskiness. My original point is that Protoss got all these early to mid game nerfs, opponent buffs, plus the economy is accelerated leaving Protoss further in the dust. Now is a perfect opportunity to revamp the Gateway units.
The more you know, the less you understand.
ClueClueClue
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
Sweden1203 Posts
November 11 2014 13:51 GMT
#385
On November 11 2014 22:44 Cloak wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 09 2014 06:06 CoraBlue wrote:
I'm reluctant on Carrier's future viability, it just sounds great on paper and even if it is broken, it will be the first unit to be reverted to its original form and left to rot. The Immortal verdict is still out but something tells me a "strong passive" changed to a "middling active" might be a nerf, and it's another spell for Protoss which already has to manage so many spellcasters.


The Carrier seems ridiculously good now. Why be reluctant about its viability when it has clearly been buffed? I'm on the fence about Immortals too, but I think overall its a decent change. The only thing that concerns me is that in the changes video, clearly all 4 of those Immortals were going to die. Against what, 6 tanks? If that's true, that's horrible, but I'm willing to wait and see. And Protoss isn't the only race to get new abilities. Herc and Ravager are activated abilities too.

Protoss is already referred to as an a-move race, and while that reputation isn't really deserved, it would be wrong to pretend that another spellcaster is a burden.


The Carrier is also infrequently seen in games due to its inaccessibility and riskiness. My original point is that Protoss got all these early to mid game nerfs, opponent buffs, plus the economy is accelerated leaving Protoss further in the dust. Now is a perfect opportunity to revamp the Gateway units.


How about a stasis ability for the carriers to counter mech and give the unit another function, apart from diverting fire from thors and possibly cyclones? The sentry could be buffed a little when it comes to health and damage too, in order to make gateway compositions stronger in smaller numbers/when forcefields get broken by ravagers.
Cogito, ergo toss.
Cloak
Profile Joined October 2009
United States816 Posts
November 11 2014 14:16 GMT
#386
On November 11 2014 22:51 ClueClueClue wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2014 22:44 Cloak wrote:
On November 09 2014 06:06 CoraBlue wrote:
I'm reluctant on Carrier's future viability, it just sounds great on paper and even if it is broken, it will be the first unit to be reverted to its original form and left to rot. The Immortal verdict is still out but something tells me a "strong passive" changed to a "middling active" might be a nerf, and it's another spell for Protoss which already has to manage so many spellcasters.


The Carrier seems ridiculously good now. Why be reluctant about its viability when it has clearly been buffed? I'm on the fence about Immortals too, but I think overall its a decent change. The only thing that concerns me is that in the changes video, clearly all 4 of those Immortals were going to die. Against what, 6 tanks? If that's true, that's horrible, but I'm willing to wait and see. And Protoss isn't the only race to get new abilities. Herc and Ravager are activated abilities too.

Protoss is already referred to as an a-move race, and while that reputation isn't really deserved, it would be wrong to pretend that another spellcaster is a burden.


The Carrier is also infrequently seen in games due to its inaccessibility and riskiness. My original point is that Protoss got all these early to mid game nerfs, opponent buffs, plus the economy is accelerated leaving Protoss further in the dust. Now is a perfect opportunity to revamp the Gateway units.


How about a stasis ability for the carriers to counter mech and give the unit another function, apart from diverting fire from thors and possibly cyclones? The sentry could be buffed a little when it comes to health and damage too, in order to make gateway compositions stronger in smaller numbers/when forcefields get broken by ravagers.


I like the idea of buffing the Sentry, FFs are less of a show stopper and for a 100 gas that needs to mean a little more these days. Zealots still seem deficient to me; Zealot Charge is anti-micro and BW Legs were way better to watch. Baseline Zealots were faster in BW too, actually making the basic unit dynamic a little more balanced that it's ever been in SC2.
The more you know, the less you understand.
OtherWorld
Profile Blog Joined October 2013
France17333 Posts
November 11 2014 14:19 GMT
#387
On November 11 2014 23:16 Cloak wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2014 22:51 ClueClueClue wrote:
On November 11 2014 22:44 Cloak wrote:
On November 09 2014 06:06 CoraBlue wrote:
I'm reluctant on Carrier's future viability, it just sounds great on paper and even if it is broken, it will be the first unit to be reverted to its original form and left to rot. The Immortal verdict is still out but something tells me a "strong passive" changed to a "middling active" might be a nerf, and it's another spell for Protoss which already has to manage so many spellcasters.


The Carrier seems ridiculously good now. Why be reluctant about its viability when it has clearly been buffed? I'm on the fence about Immortals too, but I think overall its a decent change. The only thing that concerns me is that in the changes video, clearly all 4 of those Immortals were going to die. Against what, 6 tanks? If that's true, that's horrible, but I'm willing to wait and see. And Protoss isn't the only race to get new abilities. Herc and Ravager are activated abilities too.

Protoss is already referred to as an a-move race, and while that reputation isn't really deserved, it would be wrong to pretend that another spellcaster is a burden.


The Carrier is also infrequently seen in games due to its inaccessibility and riskiness. My original point is that Protoss got all these early to mid game nerfs, opponent buffs, plus the economy is accelerated leaving Protoss further in the dust. Now is a perfect opportunity to revamp the Gateway units.


How about a stasis ability for the carriers to counter mech and give the unit another function, apart from diverting fire from thors and possibly cyclones? The sentry could be buffed a little when it comes to health and damage too, in order to make gateway compositions stronger in smaller numbers/when forcefields get broken by ravagers.


I like the idea of buffing the Sentry, FFs are less of a show stopper and for a 100 gas that needs to mean a little more these days. Zealots still seem deficient to me; Zealot Charge is anti-micro and BW Legs were way better to watch. Baseline Zealots were faster in BW too, actually making the basic unit dynamic a little more balanced that it's ever been in SC2.

The sentry seems fine to me. Their FFs are still useful in some situations but not seen everytime, and they provide an ability to scout that is imo unmatched by the other races (hallucinated phoenix). As for Zealot's charge I would love to see it as a manual ability
Used Sigs - New Sigs - Cheap Sigs - Buy the Best Cheap Sig near You at www.cheapsigforsale.com
ClueClueClue
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
Sweden1203 Posts
November 11 2014 15:38 GMT
#388
On November 11 2014 23:16 Cloak wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2014 22:51 ClueClueClue wrote:
On November 11 2014 22:44 Cloak wrote:
On November 09 2014 06:06 CoraBlue wrote:
I'm reluctant on Carrier's future viability, it just sounds great on paper and even if it is broken, it will be the first unit to be reverted to its original form and left to rot. The Immortal verdict is still out but something tells me a "strong passive" changed to a "middling active" might be a nerf, and it's another spell for Protoss which already has to manage so many spellcasters.


The Carrier seems ridiculously good now. Why be reluctant about its viability when it has clearly been buffed? I'm on the fence about Immortals too, but I think overall its a decent change. The only thing that concerns me is that in the changes video, clearly all 4 of those Immortals were going to die. Against what, 6 tanks? If that's true, that's horrible, but I'm willing to wait and see. And Protoss isn't the only race to get new abilities. Herc and Ravager are activated abilities too.

Protoss is already referred to as an a-move race, and while that reputation isn't really deserved, it would be wrong to pretend that another spellcaster is a burden.


The Carrier is also infrequently seen in games due to its inaccessibility and riskiness. My original point is that Protoss got all these early to mid game nerfs, opponent buffs, plus the economy is accelerated leaving Protoss further in the dust. Now is a perfect opportunity to revamp the Gateway units.


How about a stasis ability for the carriers to counter mech and give the unit another function, apart from diverting fire from thors and possibly cyclones? The sentry could be buffed a little when it comes to health and damage too, in order to make gateway compositions stronger in smaller numbers/when forcefields get broken by ravagers.


I like the idea of buffing the Sentry, FFs are less of a show stopper and for a 100 gas that needs to mean a little more these days. Zealots still seem deficient to me; Zealot Charge is anti-micro and BW Legs were way better to watch. Baseline Zealots were faster in BW too, actually making the basic unit dynamic a little more balanced that it's ever been in SC2.


Maybe the upgrade could just affect their regular speed, but to a greater extent, making the zealots about as quick as DT:s when their speed change was being considered. With some more health as well for the unit, we could see some interesting micro on both ends, not allowing the zealots to get super close and good surface area without any control from the protoss.
Cogito, ergo toss.
LoneYoShi
Profile Blog Joined June 2014
France1348 Posts
November 11 2014 15:51 GMT
#389
On November 12 2014 00:38 ClueClueClue wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2014 23:16 Cloak wrote:
On November 11 2014 22:51 ClueClueClue wrote:
On November 11 2014 22:44 Cloak wrote:
On November 09 2014 06:06 CoraBlue wrote:
I'm reluctant on Carrier's future viability, it just sounds great on paper and even if it is broken, it will be the first unit to be reverted to its original form and left to rot. The Immortal verdict is still out but something tells me a "strong passive" changed to a "middling active" might be a nerf, and it's another spell for Protoss which already has to manage so many spellcasters.


The Carrier seems ridiculously good now. Why be reluctant about its viability when it has clearly been buffed? I'm on the fence about Immortals too, but I think overall its a decent change. The only thing that concerns me is that in the changes video, clearly all 4 of those Immortals were going to die. Against what, 6 tanks? If that's true, that's horrible, but I'm willing to wait and see. And Protoss isn't the only race to get new abilities. Herc and Ravager are activated abilities too.

Protoss is already referred to as an a-move race, and while that reputation isn't really deserved, it would be wrong to pretend that another spellcaster is a burden.


The Carrier is also infrequently seen in games due to its inaccessibility and riskiness. My original point is that Protoss got all these early to mid game nerfs, opponent buffs, plus the economy is accelerated leaving Protoss further in the dust. Now is a perfect opportunity to revamp the Gateway units.


How about a stasis ability for the carriers to counter mech and give the unit another function, apart from diverting fire from thors and possibly cyclones? The sentry could be buffed a little when it comes to health and damage too, in order to make gateway compositions stronger in smaller numbers/when forcefields get broken by ravagers.


I like the idea of buffing the Sentry, FFs are less of a show stopper and for a 100 gas that needs to mean a little more these days. Zealots still seem deficient to me; Zealot Charge is anti-micro and BW Legs were way better to watch. Baseline Zealots were faster in BW too, actually making the basic unit dynamic a little more balanced that it's ever been in SC2.


Maybe the upgrade could just affect their regular speed, but to a greater extent, making the zealots about as quick as DT:s when their speed change was being considered. With some more health as well for the unit, we could see some interesting micro on both ends, not allowing the zealots to get super close and good surface area without any control from the protoss.

If I remember correctly when they made sure that charging zealot did at least one hit to kiting units, their rationale was to avoid having the zealots kited to death by marauders with the protoss player absolutely unable to do anything. IMO they fixed it in a bad way (making sure the Zealots hit once, but still not requiring any action from the P side). But with your suggestion, I can only imagine the frustration of a protoss player seeing his zealot tank getting kited to death withouth landing a single blow...
MilkDud
Profile Joined June 2013
Canada73 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-11-11 16:00:10
November 11 2014 15:57 GMT
#390
On November 09 2014 01:55 Ramiz1989 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 09 2014 01:42 Tzyx wrote:
Is there a vod for the other showmatches or was the TvZ the only one so far?



Even though it isn't on English, it is much better than the first one in my opinion. Showing some crazy stuff.


Uugh. Swarmhosts are much worse now. How is a Zerg supposed to deal with the protoss death ball without them? I'd like to see flying locusts be able to attack from the air, and/or hit air units.

Lurkers also seems kinda useless. Hopefully Blizzard buffs some things. Oh and ravagers are completely useless vs anything that can move. I can see them useful for breaking static D though.

ClueClueClue
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
Sweden1203 Posts
November 11 2014 16:40 GMT
#391
On November 12 2014 00:51 LoneYoShi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2014 00:38 ClueClueClue wrote:
On November 11 2014 23:16 Cloak wrote:
On November 11 2014 22:51 ClueClueClue wrote:
On November 11 2014 22:44 Cloak wrote:
On November 09 2014 06:06 CoraBlue wrote:
I'm reluctant on Carrier's future viability, it just sounds great on paper and even if it is broken, it will be the first unit to be reverted to its original form and left to rot. The Immortal verdict is still out but something tells me a "strong passive" changed to a "middling active" might be a nerf, and it's another spell for Protoss which already has to manage so many spellcasters.


The Carrier seems ridiculously good now. Why be reluctant about its viability when it has clearly been buffed? I'm on the fence about Immortals too, but I think overall its a decent change. The only thing that concerns me is that in the changes video, clearly all 4 of those Immortals were going to die. Against what, 6 tanks? If that's true, that's horrible, but I'm willing to wait and see. And Protoss isn't the only race to get new abilities. Herc and Ravager are activated abilities too.

Protoss is already referred to as an a-move race, and while that reputation isn't really deserved, it would be wrong to pretend that another spellcaster is a burden.


The Carrier is also infrequently seen in games due to its inaccessibility and riskiness. My original point is that Protoss got all these early to mid game nerfs, opponent buffs, plus the economy is accelerated leaving Protoss further in the dust. Now is a perfect opportunity to revamp the Gateway units.


How about a stasis ability for the carriers to counter mech and give the unit another function, apart from diverting fire from thors and possibly cyclones? The sentry could be buffed a little when it comes to health and damage too, in order to make gateway compositions stronger in smaller numbers/when forcefields get broken by ravagers.


I like the idea of buffing the Sentry, FFs are less of a show stopper and for a 100 gas that needs to mean a little more these days. Zealots still seem deficient to me; Zealot Charge is anti-micro and BW Legs were way better to watch. Baseline Zealots were faster in BW too, actually making the basic unit dynamic a little more balanced that it's ever been in SC2.


Maybe the upgrade could just affect their regular speed, but to a greater extent, making the zealots about as quick as DT:s when their speed change was being considered. With some more health as well for the unit, we could see some interesting micro on both ends, not allowing the zealots to get super close and good surface area without any control from the protoss.

If I remember correctly when they made sure that charging zealot did at least one hit to kiting units, their rationale was to avoid having the zealots kited to death by marauders with the protoss player absolutely unable to do anything. IMO they fixed it in a bad way (making sure the Zealots hit once, but still not requiring any action from the P side). But with your suggestion, I can only imagine the frustration of a protoss player seeing his zealot tank getting kited to death withouth landing a single blow...


Well, the higher movement speed would also mean that zealots move quicker while affected by concussive shell. Sure, they would still be kiteable, but also better at escaping marauders, since the charge doesn't help out when you're running away from units, rather than towards them.
Cogito, ergo toss.
Cloak
Profile Joined October 2009
United States816 Posts
November 11 2014 17:45 GMT
#392
On November 12 2014 00:51 LoneYoShi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2014 00:38 ClueClueClue wrote:
On November 11 2014 23:16 Cloak wrote:
On November 11 2014 22:51 ClueClueClue wrote:
On November 11 2014 22:44 Cloak wrote:
On November 09 2014 06:06 CoraBlue wrote:
I'm reluctant on Carrier's future viability, it just sounds great on paper and even if it is broken, it will be the first unit to be reverted to its original form and left to rot. The Immortal verdict is still out but something tells me a "strong passive" changed to a "middling active" might be a nerf, and it's another spell for Protoss which already has to manage so many spellcasters.


The Carrier seems ridiculously good now. Why be reluctant about its viability when it has clearly been buffed? I'm on the fence about Immortals too, but I think overall its a decent change. The only thing that concerns me is that in the changes video, clearly all 4 of those Immortals were going to die. Against what, 6 tanks? If that's true, that's horrible, but I'm willing to wait and see. And Protoss isn't the only race to get new abilities. Herc and Ravager are activated abilities too.

Protoss is already referred to as an a-move race, and while that reputation isn't really deserved, it would be wrong to pretend that another spellcaster is a burden.


The Carrier is also infrequently seen in games due to its inaccessibility and riskiness. My original point is that Protoss got all these early to mid game nerfs, opponent buffs, plus the economy is accelerated leaving Protoss further in the dust. Now is a perfect opportunity to revamp the Gateway units.


How about a stasis ability for the carriers to counter mech and give the unit another function, apart from diverting fire from thors and possibly cyclones? The sentry could be buffed a little when it comes to health and damage too, in order to make gateway compositions stronger in smaller numbers/when forcefields get broken by ravagers.


I like the idea of buffing the Sentry, FFs are less of a show stopper and for a 100 gas that needs to mean a little more these days. Zealots still seem deficient to me; Zealot Charge is anti-micro and BW Legs were way better to watch. Baseline Zealots were faster in BW too, actually making the basic unit dynamic a little more balanced that it's ever been in SC2.


Maybe the upgrade could just affect their regular speed, but to a greater extent, making the zealots about as quick as DT:s when their speed change was being considered. With some more health as well for the unit, we could see some interesting micro on both ends, not allowing the zealots to get super close and good surface area without any control from the protoss.

If I remember correctly when they made sure that charging zealot did at least one hit to kiting units, their rationale was to avoid having the zealots kited to death by marauders with the protoss player absolutely unable to do anything. IMO they fixed it in a bad way (making sure the Zealots hit once, but still not requiring any action from the P side). But with your suggestion, I can only imagine the frustration of a protoss player seeing his zealot tank getting kited to death withouth landing a single blow...


Well, the speed should be adjusted with concussive in mind or partial snare resistance where Zealots slightly gain on a kiting Marauder but he can escape with full retreat on Stim.
The more you know, the less you understand.
Foxxan
Profile Joined October 2004
Sweden3427 Posts
November 11 2014 18:18 GMT
#393
Maybe its possible to add some kind of dispel on sentinel?
Prev 1 18 19 20 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 10h 47m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft377
Nina 197
ViBE64
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 625
ZZZero.O 247
NaDa 19
Hyuk 18
Mong 14
Dota 2
syndereN569
canceldota99
NeuroSwarm33
League of Legends
JimRising 770
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox406
Heroes of the Storm
Trikslyr96
Other Games
summit1g7079
FrodaN2103
KnowMe164
CosmosSc2 16
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1556
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• musti20045 56
• Adnapsc2 24
• HeavenSC 7
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• ChaeLyn 9
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21182
League of Legends
• Nemesis2600
• Jankos2504
• Scarra1167
Other Games
• imaqtpie840
• Shiphtur501
Upcoming Events
FEL
10h 47m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
10h 47m
Replay Cast
23h 47m
WardiTV Weekly
1d 12h
IntoTheTV X SOOP
2 days
ByuN vs Lambo
MaxPax vs Bunny
PiGosaur Cup
3 days
The PondCast
3 days
Kung Fu Cup
3 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
4 days
SHIN vs GuMiho
Clem vs Classic
WardiTV Invitational
5 days
[ Show More ]
GSL
5 days
Epic.LAN
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Epic.LAN
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #5 - GSC
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
BSL Season 23
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

IPSL Winter 2026-27
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.