• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 16:39
CEST 22:39
KST 05:39
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915Serral wins Maestros of the Game 244
Community News
Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon?98Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)9Weekly Cups (August 24-30): Patches' balance mod takes over3New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery!46Weekly Cups (August 17-23): Zerg dominate the week6
StarCraft 2
General
Nexon wins bid to develop StarCraft IP content, distribute Overwatch mobile game Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) SC4ALL: II Winner Will Earn a Spot at HSC 30! Weekly Cups (August 24-30): Patches' balance mod takes over September World Ranking: herO leads, Serral climbs
Tourneys
2026 GSTL Announcement Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) IntoTheTV X SOOP SC2 League : Weekly & Monthly SC2 INu's Battles#20 [BO.9]
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 542 The Ascended Mutation # 541 Binary Choice The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 540 Dodge This
Brood War
General
New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery! ASL22 General Discussion Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Pros React To: Calm's Big Brain Play Vs Mini
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro16 Group A [ASL22] Ro24 Group F [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Brood War in Budapest ! WORTEX 2026 BW Finals
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Replay Review Process - What do you do? Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Diablo IV EVE Corporation [Maplestory Hardcore] Let's Play~!! General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
F* the Children and Get Off …
TrAiDoS
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
Regacy Esports: The Bh…
regacyesports
LOCKPICKING NOOB
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 7511 users

BlizzCon Exhibition Matches - Page 20

Forum Index > SC2 General
392 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 18 19 20 All
ClueClueClue
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
Sweden1203 Posts
November 11 2014 09:40 GMT
#381
The sieged tank harassment seems pretty strong too, unless you have fast and effective anti-air... maybe they could change it so that the attack cooldown is reset when the tanks are unloaded? If there was a little delay between unloading and firing, I think counter-micro would be a lot more effective and the units would work more like a reaver in a shuttle.
Cogito, ergo toss.
Tzyx
Profile Joined August 2010
Northern Ireland281 Posts
November 11 2014 10:50 GMT
#382
Swarm Hosts should spawn larva instead of those mental locusts lol, there'd be a use for them then
ClueClueClue
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
Sweden1203 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-11-11 11:37:22
November 11 2014 11:22 GMT
#383
On November 11 2014 19:50 Tzyx wrote:
Swarm Hosts should spawn larva instead of those mental locusts lol, there'd be a use for them then


This is actually a really cool idea! The host could be a little bit more expensive and work as a portable hatchery, which would make zerg proxied reinforcements a thing. Or maybe you could load it up with already existing units and catapult them out over a wall of forcefields, up a ramp or behind an army to create a surround.
Cogito, ergo toss.
Cloak
Profile Joined October 2009
United States816 Posts
November 11 2014 13:44 GMT
#384
On November 09 2014 06:06 CoraBlue wrote:
Show nested quote +
I'm reluctant on Carrier's future viability, it just sounds great on paper and even if it is broken, it will be the first unit to be reverted to its original form and left to rot. The Immortal verdict is still out but something tells me a "strong passive" changed to a "middling active" might be a nerf, and it's another spell for Protoss which already has to manage so many spellcasters.


The Carrier seems ridiculously good now. Why be reluctant about its viability when it has clearly been buffed? I'm on the fence about Immortals too, but I think overall its a decent change. The only thing that concerns me is that in the changes video, clearly all 4 of those Immortals were going to die. Against what, 6 tanks? If that's true, that's horrible, but I'm willing to wait and see. And Protoss isn't the only race to get new abilities. Herc and Ravager are activated abilities too.

Protoss is already referred to as an a-move race, and while that reputation isn't really deserved, it would be wrong to pretend that another spellcaster is a burden.


The Carrier is also infrequently seen in games due to its inaccessibility and riskiness. My original point is that Protoss got all these early to mid game nerfs, opponent buffs, plus the economy is accelerated leaving Protoss further in the dust. Now is a perfect opportunity to revamp the Gateway units.
The more you know, the less you understand.
ClueClueClue
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
Sweden1203 Posts
November 11 2014 13:51 GMT
#385
On November 11 2014 22:44 Cloak wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 09 2014 06:06 CoraBlue wrote:
I'm reluctant on Carrier's future viability, it just sounds great on paper and even if it is broken, it will be the first unit to be reverted to its original form and left to rot. The Immortal verdict is still out but something tells me a "strong passive" changed to a "middling active" might be a nerf, and it's another spell for Protoss which already has to manage so many spellcasters.


The Carrier seems ridiculously good now. Why be reluctant about its viability when it has clearly been buffed? I'm on the fence about Immortals too, but I think overall its a decent change. The only thing that concerns me is that in the changes video, clearly all 4 of those Immortals were going to die. Against what, 6 tanks? If that's true, that's horrible, but I'm willing to wait and see. And Protoss isn't the only race to get new abilities. Herc and Ravager are activated abilities too.

Protoss is already referred to as an a-move race, and while that reputation isn't really deserved, it would be wrong to pretend that another spellcaster is a burden.


The Carrier is also infrequently seen in games due to its inaccessibility and riskiness. My original point is that Protoss got all these early to mid game nerfs, opponent buffs, plus the economy is accelerated leaving Protoss further in the dust. Now is a perfect opportunity to revamp the Gateway units.


How about a stasis ability for the carriers to counter mech and give the unit another function, apart from diverting fire from thors and possibly cyclones? The sentry could be buffed a little when it comes to health and damage too, in order to make gateway compositions stronger in smaller numbers/when forcefields get broken by ravagers.
Cogito, ergo toss.
Cloak
Profile Joined October 2009
United States816 Posts
November 11 2014 14:16 GMT
#386
On November 11 2014 22:51 ClueClueClue wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2014 22:44 Cloak wrote:
On November 09 2014 06:06 CoraBlue wrote:
I'm reluctant on Carrier's future viability, it just sounds great on paper and even if it is broken, it will be the first unit to be reverted to its original form and left to rot. The Immortal verdict is still out but something tells me a "strong passive" changed to a "middling active" might be a nerf, and it's another spell for Protoss which already has to manage so many spellcasters.


The Carrier seems ridiculously good now. Why be reluctant about its viability when it has clearly been buffed? I'm on the fence about Immortals too, but I think overall its a decent change. The only thing that concerns me is that in the changes video, clearly all 4 of those Immortals were going to die. Against what, 6 tanks? If that's true, that's horrible, but I'm willing to wait and see. And Protoss isn't the only race to get new abilities. Herc and Ravager are activated abilities too.

Protoss is already referred to as an a-move race, and while that reputation isn't really deserved, it would be wrong to pretend that another spellcaster is a burden.


The Carrier is also infrequently seen in games due to its inaccessibility and riskiness. My original point is that Protoss got all these early to mid game nerfs, opponent buffs, plus the economy is accelerated leaving Protoss further in the dust. Now is a perfect opportunity to revamp the Gateway units.


How about a stasis ability for the carriers to counter mech and give the unit another function, apart from diverting fire from thors and possibly cyclones? The sentry could be buffed a little when it comes to health and damage too, in order to make gateway compositions stronger in smaller numbers/when forcefields get broken by ravagers.


I like the idea of buffing the Sentry, FFs are less of a show stopper and for a 100 gas that needs to mean a little more these days. Zealots still seem deficient to me; Zealot Charge is anti-micro and BW Legs were way better to watch. Baseline Zealots were faster in BW too, actually making the basic unit dynamic a little more balanced that it's ever been in SC2.
The more you know, the less you understand.
OtherWorld
Profile Blog Joined October 2013
France17333 Posts
November 11 2014 14:19 GMT
#387
On November 11 2014 23:16 Cloak wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2014 22:51 ClueClueClue wrote:
On November 11 2014 22:44 Cloak wrote:
On November 09 2014 06:06 CoraBlue wrote:
I'm reluctant on Carrier's future viability, it just sounds great on paper and even if it is broken, it will be the first unit to be reverted to its original form and left to rot. The Immortal verdict is still out but something tells me a "strong passive" changed to a "middling active" might be a nerf, and it's another spell for Protoss which already has to manage so many spellcasters.


The Carrier seems ridiculously good now. Why be reluctant about its viability when it has clearly been buffed? I'm on the fence about Immortals too, but I think overall its a decent change. The only thing that concerns me is that in the changes video, clearly all 4 of those Immortals were going to die. Against what, 6 tanks? If that's true, that's horrible, but I'm willing to wait and see. And Protoss isn't the only race to get new abilities. Herc and Ravager are activated abilities too.

Protoss is already referred to as an a-move race, and while that reputation isn't really deserved, it would be wrong to pretend that another spellcaster is a burden.


The Carrier is also infrequently seen in games due to its inaccessibility and riskiness. My original point is that Protoss got all these early to mid game nerfs, opponent buffs, plus the economy is accelerated leaving Protoss further in the dust. Now is a perfect opportunity to revamp the Gateway units.


How about a stasis ability for the carriers to counter mech and give the unit another function, apart from diverting fire from thors and possibly cyclones? The sentry could be buffed a little when it comes to health and damage too, in order to make gateway compositions stronger in smaller numbers/when forcefields get broken by ravagers.


I like the idea of buffing the Sentry, FFs are less of a show stopper and for a 100 gas that needs to mean a little more these days. Zealots still seem deficient to me; Zealot Charge is anti-micro and BW Legs were way better to watch. Baseline Zealots were faster in BW too, actually making the basic unit dynamic a little more balanced that it's ever been in SC2.

The sentry seems fine to me. Their FFs are still useful in some situations but not seen everytime, and they provide an ability to scout that is imo unmatched by the other races (hallucinated phoenix). As for Zealot's charge I would love to see it as a manual ability
Used Sigs - New Sigs - Cheap Sigs - Buy the Best Cheap Sig near You at www.cheapsigforsale.com
ClueClueClue
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
Sweden1203 Posts
November 11 2014 15:38 GMT
#388
On November 11 2014 23:16 Cloak wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2014 22:51 ClueClueClue wrote:
On November 11 2014 22:44 Cloak wrote:
On November 09 2014 06:06 CoraBlue wrote:
I'm reluctant on Carrier's future viability, it just sounds great on paper and even if it is broken, it will be the first unit to be reverted to its original form and left to rot. The Immortal verdict is still out but something tells me a "strong passive" changed to a "middling active" might be a nerf, and it's another spell for Protoss which already has to manage so many spellcasters.


The Carrier seems ridiculously good now. Why be reluctant about its viability when it has clearly been buffed? I'm on the fence about Immortals too, but I think overall its a decent change. The only thing that concerns me is that in the changes video, clearly all 4 of those Immortals were going to die. Against what, 6 tanks? If that's true, that's horrible, but I'm willing to wait and see. And Protoss isn't the only race to get new abilities. Herc and Ravager are activated abilities too.

Protoss is already referred to as an a-move race, and while that reputation isn't really deserved, it would be wrong to pretend that another spellcaster is a burden.


The Carrier is also infrequently seen in games due to its inaccessibility and riskiness. My original point is that Protoss got all these early to mid game nerfs, opponent buffs, plus the economy is accelerated leaving Protoss further in the dust. Now is a perfect opportunity to revamp the Gateway units.


How about a stasis ability for the carriers to counter mech and give the unit another function, apart from diverting fire from thors and possibly cyclones? The sentry could be buffed a little when it comes to health and damage too, in order to make gateway compositions stronger in smaller numbers/when forcefields get broken by ravagers.


I like the idea of buffing the Sentry, FFs are less of a show stopper and for a 100 gas that needs to mean a little more these days. Zealots still seem deficient to me; Zealot Charge is anti-micro and BW Legs were way better to watch. Baseline Zealots were faster in BW too, actually making the basic unit dynamic a little more balanced that it's ever been in SC2.


Maybe the upgrade could just affect their regular speed, but to a greater extent, making the zealots about as quick as DT:s when their speed change was being considered. With some more health as well for the unit, we could see some interesting micro on both ends, not allowing the zealots to get super close and good surface area without any control from the protoss.
Cogito, ergo toss.
LoneYoShi
Profile Blog Joined June 2014
France1348 Posts
November 11 2014 15:51 GMT
#389
On November 12 2014 00:38 ClueClueClue wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2014 23:16 Cloak wrote:
On November 11 2014 22:51 ClueClueClue wrote:
On November 11 2014 22:44 Cloak wrote:
On November 09 2014 06:06 CoraBlue wrote:
I'm reluctant on Carrier's future viability, it just sounds great on paper and even if it is broken, it will be the first unit to be reverted to its original form and left to rot. The Immortal verdict is still out but something tells me a "strong passive" changed to a "middling active" might be a nerf, and it's another spell for Protoss which already has to manage so many spellcasters.


The Carrier seems ridiculously good now. Why be reluctant about its viability when it has clearly been buffed? I'm on the fence about Immortals too, but I think overall its a decent change. The only thing that concerns me is that in the changes video, clearly all 4 of those Immortals were going to die. Against what, 6 tanks? If that's true, that's horrible, but I'm willing to wait and see. And Protoss isn't the only race to get new abilities. Herc and Ravager are activated abilities too.

Protoss is already referred to as an a-move race, and while that reputation isn't really deserved, it would be wrong to pretend that another spellcaster is a burden.


The Carrier is also infrequently seen in games due to its inaccessibility and riskiness. My original point is that Protoss got all these early to mid game nerfs, opponent buffs, plus the economy is accelerated leaving Protoss further in the dust. Now is a perfect opportunity to revamp the Gateway units.


How about a stasis ability for the carriers to counter mech and give the unit another function, apart from diverting fire from thors and possibly cyclones? The sentry could be buffed a little when it comes to health and damage too, in order to make gateway compositions stronger in smaller numbers/when forcefields get broken by ravagers.


I like the idea of buffing the Sentry, FFs are less of a show stopper and for a 100 gas that needs to mean a little more these days. Zealots still seem deficient to me; Zealot Charge is anti-micro and BW Legs were way better to watch. Baseline Zealots were faster in BW too, actually making the basic unit dynamic a little more balanced that it's ever been in SC2.


Maybe the upgrade could just affect their regular speed, but to a greater extent, making the zealots about as quick as DT:s when their speed change was being considered. With some more health as well for the unit, we could see some interesting micro on both ends, not allowing the zealots to get super close and good surface area without any control from the protoss.

If I remember correctly when they made sure that charging zealot did at least one hit to kiting units, their rationale was to avoid having the zealots kited to death by marauders with the protoss player absolutely unable to do anything. IMO they fixed it in a bad way (making sure the Zealots hit once, but still not requiring any action from the P side). But with your suggestion, I can only imagine the frustration of a protoss player seeing his zealot tank getting kited to death withouth landing a single blow...
MilkDud
Profile Joined June 2013
Canada73 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-11-11 16:00:10
November 11 2014 15:57 GMT
#390
On November 09 2014 01:55 Ramiz1989 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 09 2014 01:42 Tzyx wrote:
Is there a vod for the other showmatches or was the TvZ the only one so far?



Even though it isn't on English, it is much better than the first one in my opinion. Showing some crazy stuff.


Uugh. Swarmhosts are much worse now. How is a Zerg supposed to deal with the protoss death ball without them? I'd like to see flying locusts be able to attack from the air, and/or hit air units.

Lurkers also seems kinda useless. Hopefully Blizzard buffs some things. Oh and ravagers are completely useless vs anything that can move. I can see them useful for breaking static D though.

ClueClueClue
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
Sweden1203 Posts
November 11 2014 16:40 GMT
#391
On November 12 2014 00:51 LoneYoShi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2014 00:38 ClueClueClue wrote:
On November 11 2014 23:16 Cloak wrote:
On November 11 2014 22:51 ClueClueClue wrote:
On November 11 2014 22:44 Cloak wrote:
On November 09 2014 06:06 CoraBlue wrote:
I'm reluctant on Carrier's future viability, it just sounds great on paper and even if it is broken, it will be the first unit to be reverted to its original form and left to rot. The Immortal verdict is still out but something tells me a "strong passive" changed to a "middling active" might be a nerf, and it's another spell for Protoss which already has to manage so many spellcasters.


The Carrier seems ridiculously good now. Why be reluctant about its viability when it has clearly been buffed? I'm on the fence about Immortals too, but I think overall its a decent change. The only thing that concerns me is that in the changes video, clearly all 4 of those Immortals were going to die. Against what, 6 tanks? If that's true, that's horrible, but I'm willing to wait and see. And Protoss isn't the only race to get new abilities. Herc and Ravager are activated abilities too.

Protoss is already referred to as an a-move race, and while that reputation isn't really deserved, it would be wrong to pretend that another spellcaster is a burden.


The Carrier is also infrequently seen in games due to its inaccessibility and riskiness. My original point is that Protoss got all these early to mid game nerfs, opponent buffs, plus the economy is accelerated leaving Protoss further in the dust. Now is a perfect opportunity to revamp the Gateway units.


How about a stasis ability for the carriers to counter mech and give the unit another function, apart from diverting fire from thors and possibly cyclones? The sentry could be buffed a little when it comes to health and damage too, in order to make gateway compositions stronger in smaller numbers/when forcefields get broken by ravagers.


I like the idea of buffing the Sentry, FFs are less of a show stopper and for a 100 gas that needs to mean a little more these days. Zealots still seem deficient to me; Zealot Charge is anti-micro and BW Legs were way better to watch. Baseline Zealots were faster in BW too, actually making the basic unit dynamic a little more balanced that it's ever been in SC2.


Maybe the upgrade could just affect their regular speed, but to a greater extent, making the zealots about as quick as DT:s when their speed change was being considered. With some more health as well for the unit, we could see some interesting micro on both ends, not allowing the zealots to get super close and good surface area without any control from the protoss.

If I remember correctly when they made sure that charging zealot did at least one hit to kiting units, their rationale was to avoid having the zealots kited to death by marauders with the protoss player absolutely unable to do anything. IMO they fixed it in a bad way (making sure the Zealots hit once, but still not requiring any action from the P side). But with your suggestion, I can only imagine the frustration of a protoss player seeing his zealot tank getting kited to death withouth landing a single blow...


Well, the higher movement speed would also mean that zealots move quicker while affected by concussive shell. Sure, they would still be kiteable, but also better at escaping marauders, since the charge doesn't help out when you're running away from units, rather than towards them.
Cogito, ergo toss.
Cloak
Profile Joined October 2009
United States816 Posts
November 11 2014 17:45 GMT
#392
On November 12 2014 00:51 LoneYoShi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2014 00:38 ClueClueClue wrote:
On November 11 2014 23:16 Cloak wrote:
On November 11 2014 22:51 ClueClueClue wrote:
On November 11 2014 22:44 Cloak wrote:
On November 09 2014 06:06 CoraBlue wrote:
I'm reluctant on Carrier's future viability, it just sounds great on paper and even if it is broken, it will be the first unit to be reverted to its original form and left to rot. The Immortal verdict is still out but something tells me a "strong passive" changed to a "middling active" might be a nerf, and it's another spell for Protoss which already has to manage so many spellcasters.


The Carrier seems ridiculously good now. Why be reluctant about its viability when it has clearly been buffed? I'm on the fence about Immortals too, but I think overall its a decent change. The only thing that concerns me is that in the changes video, clearly all 4 of those Immortals were going to die. Against what, 6 tanks? If that's true, that's horrible, but I'm willing to wait and see. And Protoss isn't the only race to get new abilities. Herc and Ravager are activated abilities too.

Protoss is already referred to as an a-move race, and while that reputation isn't really deserved, it would be wrong to pretend that another spellcaster is a burden.


The Carrier is also infrequently seen in games due to its inaccessibility and riskiness. My original point is that Protoss got all these early to mid game nerfs, opponent buffs, plus the economy is accelerated leaving Protoss further in the dust. Now is a perfect opportunity to revamp the Gateway units.


How about a stasis ability for the carriers to counter mech and give the unit another function, apart from diverting fire from thors and possibly cyclones? The sentry could be buffed a little when it comes to health and damage too, in order to make gateway compositions stronger in smaller numbers/when forcefields get broken by ravagers.


I like the idea of buffing the Sentry, FFs are less of a show stopper and for a 100 gas that needs to mean a little more these days. Zealots still seem deficient to me; Zealot Charge is anti-micro and BW Legs were way better to watch. Baseline Zealots were faster in BW too, actually making the basic unit dynamic a little more balanced that it's ever been in SC2.


Maybe the upgrade could just affect their regular speed, but to a greater extent, making the zealots about as quick as DT:s when their speed change was being considered. With some more health as well for the unit, we could see some interesting micro on both ends, not allowing the zealots to get super close and good surface area without any control from the protoss.

If I remember correctly when they made sure that charging zealot did at least one hit to kiting units, their rationale was to avoid having the zealots kited to death by marauders with the protoss player absolutely unable to do anything. IMO they fixed it in a bad way (making sure the Zealots hit once, but still not requiring any action from the P side). But with your suggestion, I can only imagine the frustration of a protoss player seeing his zealot tank getting kited to death withouth landing a single blow...


Well, the speed should be adjusted with concussive in mind or partial snare resistance where Zealots slightly gain on a kiting Marauder but he can escape with full retreat on Stim.
The more you know, the less you understand.
Foxxan
Profile Joined October 2004
Sweden3427 Posts
November 11 2014 18:18 GMT
#393
Maybe its possible to add some kind of dispel on sentinel?
Prev 1 18 19 20 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Monday Night Weeklies
16:00
#62
RotterdaM1110
TKL 348
SteadfastSC300
IndyStarCraft 224
ZombieGrub113
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 1110
TKL 348
SteadfastSC 300
IndyStarCraft 224
ZombieGrub113
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 835
White-Ra 185
Mong 47
Dota 2
monkeys_forever281
Counter-Strike
byalli1411
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu499
Other Games
Grubby3873
Liquid`RaSZi3831
fl0m1255
Beastyqt701
C9.Mang0294
420jenkins100
Trikslyr55
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1223
BasetradeTV81
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• kabyraGe 167
• EnkiAlexander 49
• Response 1
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22606
Other Games
• imaqtpie1520
• Shiphtur374
Upcoming Events
Afreeca Starleague
13h 21m
Leta vs ggaemo
Jaedong vs Queen
GSL
14h 21m
PiGosaur Cup
1d 3h
Kung Fu Cup
1d 14h
Replay Cast
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
KCM Race Survival
2 days
Escore
3 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
5 days
Spirit vs Mixu
Clem vs TBD
RSL Revival
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
WardiTV Weekly
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-09-02
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - TRS
RSL Revival: Season 6
Calamity Invitational
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: King of Kings
Acropolis #5 - GSA
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
SC4ALL II: Brood War
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.