• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:57
CEST 21:57
KST 04:57
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2914Serral wins Maestros of the Game 243ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12
Community News
ZeroSpace Early Access is Now Live!17Weekly Cups (July 13-19): Terran & Protoss rise; Zerg falters2Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16)84Reynor: GSL Loss Wasn't About Preparation Format16[IPSL] Spring 2026 Grand Finals - This Weekend!18
StarCraft 2
General
How would you feel about frequent/monthly balance patches for SC2? Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) Clem: "I don't have that much hope in Blizzard" Weekly Cups (July 13-19): Terran & Protoss rise; Zerg falters [D] Wireframe Casting Removed
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) WardiTV Summer Cup 2026 GSL CK #5 Race War HomeStory Cup 29
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Industrial Park New Map Maker - Looking for Advice - Love or Hate
External Content
Mutation # 535 Assembly of Vengeance The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 534 Burning Evacuation Mutation # 533 Die Together
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Animated Gateway HORROR STARCRAFT MOVIE How Famous was FlaSh before his Debut?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [IPSL] Spring 2026 Grand Finals - This Weekend! Escore Tournament - Season 3 Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers PvT advise for noobs Fighting Spirit mining rates Creating a full chart of Zerg builds
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile General RTS Discussion Thread Diablo IV ZeroSpace Early Access is Now Live! ZeroSpace at Steam NextFest - Last free demo
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread How to buy a book - shipping from Korea to Europe The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club The HerO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Series you have seen recently... Movie Discussion! [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 McBoner: A hockey love story
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Simple Questions Simple Answers FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop
TL Community
Northern Ireland Global Starcraft The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Hello guys!
LIN1s
Role of Gaming on Mental Hea…
TrAiDoS
ASL S22 English Commentary…
namkraft
Poker (part 2)
Nebuchad
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 5818 users

BlizzCon Exhibition Matches - Page 20

Forum Index > SC2 General
392 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 18 19 20 All
ClueClueClue
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
Sweden1203 Posts
November 11 2014 09:40 GMT
#381
The sieged tank harassment seems pretty strong too, unless you have fast and effective anti-air... maybe they could change it so that the attack cooldown is reset when the tanks are unloaded? If there was a little delay between unloading and firing, I think counter-micro would be a lot more effective and the units would work more like a reaver in a shuttle.
Cogito, ergo toss.
Tzyx
Profile Joined August 2010
Northern Ireland281 Posts
November 11 2014 10:50 GMT
#382
Swarm Hosts should spawn larva instead of those mental locusts lol, there'd be a use for them then
ClueClueClue
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
Sweden1203 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-11-11 11:37:22
November 11 2014 11:22 GMT
#383
On November 11 2014 19:50 Tzyx wrote:
Swarm Hosts should spawn larva instead of those mental locusts lol, there'd be a use for them then


This is actually a really cool idea! The host could be a little bit more expensive and work as a portable hatchery, which would make zerg proxied reinforcements a thing. Or maybe you could load it up with already existing units and catapult them out over a wall of forcefields, up a ramp or behind an army to create a surround.
Cogito, ergo toss.
Cloak
Profile Joined October 2009
United States816 Posts
November 11 2014 13:44 GMT
#384
On November 09 2014 06:06 CoraBlue wrote:
Show nested quote +
I'm reluctant on Carrier's future viability, it just sounds great on paper and even if it is broken, it will be the first unit to be reverted to its original form and left to rot. The Immortal verdict is still out but something tells me a "strong passive" changed to a "middling active" might be a nerf, and it's another spell for Protoss which already has to manage so many spellcasters.


The Carrier seems ridiculously good now. Why be reluctant about its viability when it has clearly been buffed? I'm on the fence about Immortals too, but I think overall its a decent change. The only thing that concerns me is that in the changes video, clearly all 4 of those Immortals were going to die. Against what, 6 tanks? If that's true, that's horrible, but I'm willing to wait and see. And Protoss isn't the only race to get new abilities. Herc and Ravager are activated abilities too.

Protoss is already referred to as an a-move race, and while that reputation isn't really deserved, it would be wrong to pretend that another spellcaster is a burden.


The Carrier is also infrequently seen in games due to its inaccessibility and riskiness. My original point is that Protoss got all these early to mid game nerfs, opponent buffs, plus the economy is accelerated leaving Protoss further in the dust. Now is a perfect opportunity to revamp the Gateway units.
The more you know, the less you understand.
ClueClueClue
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
Sweden1203 Posts
November 11 2014 13:51 GMT
#385
On November 11 2014 22:44 Cloak wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 09 2014 06:06 CoraBlue wrote:
I'm reluctant on Carrier's future viability, it just sounds great on paper and even if it is broken, it will be the first unit to be reverted to its original form and left to rot. The Immortal verdict is still out but something tells me a "strong passive" changed to a "middling active" might be a nerf, and it's another spell for Protoss which already has to manage so many spellcasters.


The Carrier seems ridiculously good now. Why be reluctant about its viability when it has clearly been buffed? I'm on the fence about Immortals too, but I think overall its a decent change. The only thing that concerns me is that in the changes video, clearly all 4 of those Immortals were going to die. Against what, 6 tanks? If that's true, that's horrible, but I'm willing to wait and see. And Protoss isn't the only race to get new abilities. Herc and Ravager are activated abilities too.

Protoss is already referred to as an a-move race, and while that reputation isn't really deserved, it would be wrong to pretend that another spellcaster is a burden.


The Carrier is also infrequently seen in games due to its inaccessibility and riskiness. My original point is that Protoss got all these early to mid game nerfs, opponent buffs, plus the economy is accelerated leaving Protoss further in the dust. Now is a perfect opportunity to revamp the Gateway units.


How about a stasis ability for the carriers to counter mech and give the unit another function, apart from diverting fire from thors and possibly cyclones? The sentry could be buffed a little when it comes to health and damage too, in order to make gateway compositions stronger in smaller numbers/when forcefields get broken by ravagers.
Cogito, ergo toss.
Cloak
Profile Joined October 2009
United States816 Posts
November 11 2014 14:16 GMT
#386
On November 11 2014 22:51 ClueClueClue wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2014 22:44 Cloak wrote:
On November 09 2014 06:06 CoraBlue wrote:
I'm reluctant on Carrier's future viability, it just sounds great on paper and even if it is broken, it will be the first unit to be reverted to its original form and left to rot. The Immortal verdict is still out but something tells me a "strong passive" changed to a "middling active" might be a nerf, and it's another spell for Protoss which already has to manage so many spellcasters.


The Carrier seems ridiculously good now. Why be reluctant about its viability when it has clearly been buffed? I'm on the fence about Immortals too, but I think overall its a decent change. The only thing that concerns me is that in the changes video, clearly all 4 of those Immortals were going to die. Against what, 6 tanks? If that's true, that's horrible, but I'm willing to wait and see. And Protoss isn't the only race to get new abilities. Herc and Ravager are activated abilities too.

Protoss is already referred to as an a-move race, and while that reputation isn't really deserved, it would be wrong to pretend that another spellcaster is a burden.


The Carrier is also infrequently seen in games due to its inaccessibility and riskiness. My original point is that Protoss got all these early to mid game nerfs, opponent buffs, plus the economy is accelerated leaving Protoss further in the dust. Now is a perfect opportunity to revamp the Gateway units.


How about a stasis ability for the carriers to counter mech and give the unit another function, apart from diverting fire from thors and possibly cyclones? The sentry could be buffed a little when it comes to health and damage too, in order to make gateway compositions stronger in smaller numbers/when forcefields get broken by ravagers.


I like the idea of buffing the Sentry, FFs are less of a show stopper and for a 100 gas that needs to mean a little more these days. Zealots still seem deficient to me; Zealot Charge is anti-micro and BW Legs were way better to watch. Baseline Zealots were faster in BW too, actually making the basic unit dynamic a little more balanced that it's ever been in SC2.
The more you know, the less you understand.
OtherWorld
Profile Blog Joined October 2013
France17333 Posts
November 11 2014 14:19 GMT
#387
On November 11 2014 23:16 Cloak wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2014 22:51 ClueClueClue wrote:
On November 11 2014 22:44 Cloak wrote:
On November 09 2014 06:06 CoraBlue wrote:
I'm reluctant on Carrier's future viability, it just sounds great on paper and even if it is broken, it will be the first unit to be reverted to its original form and left to rot. The Immortal verdict is still out but something tells me a "strong passive" changed to a "middling active" might be a nerf, and it's another spell for Protoss which already has to manage so many spellcasters.


The Carrier seems ridiculously good now. Why be reluctant about its viability when it has clearly been buffed? I'm on the fence about Immortals too, but I think overall its a decent change. The only thing that concerns me is that in the changes video, clearly all 4 of those Immortals were going to die. Against what, 6 tanks? If that's true, that's horrible, but I'm willing to wait and see. And Protoss isn't the only race to get new abilities. Herc and Ravager are activated abilities too.

Protoss is already referred to as an a-move race, and while that reputation isn't really deserved, it would be wrong to pretend that another spellcaster is a burden.


The Carrier is also infrequently seen in games due to its inaccessibility and riskiness. My original point is that Protoss got all these early to mid game nerfs, opponent buffs, plus the economy is accelerated leaving Protoss further in the dust. Now is a perfect opportunity to revamp the Gateway units.


How about a stasis ability for the carriers to counter mech and give the unit another function, apart from diverting fire from thors and possibly cyclones? The sentry could be buffed a little when it comes to health and damage too, in order to make gateway compositions stronger in smaller numbers/when forcefields get broken by ravagers.


I like the idea of buffing the Sentry, FFs are less of a show stopper and for a 100 gas that needs to mean a little more these days. Zealots still seem deficient to me; Zealot Charge is anti-micro and BW Legs were way better to watch. Baseline Zealots were faster in BW too, actually making the basic unit dynamic a little more balanced that it's ever been in SC2.

The sentry seems fine to me. Their FFs are still useful in some situations but not seen everytime, and they provide an ability to scout that is imo unmatched by the other races (hallucinated phoenix). As for Zealot's charge I would love to see it as a manual ability
Used Sigs - New Sigs - Cheap Sigs - Buy the Best Cheap Sig near You at www.cheapsigforsale.com
ClueClueClue
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
Sweden1203 Posts
November 11 2014 15:38 GMT
#388
On November 11 2014 23:16 Cloak wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2014 22:51 ClueClueClue wrote:
On November 11 2014 22:44 Cloak wrote:
On November 09 2014 06:06 CoraBlue wrote:
I'm reluctant on Carrier's future viability, it just sounds great on paper and even if it is broken, it will be the first unit to be reverted to its original form and left to rot. The Immortal verdict is still out but something tells me a "strong passive" changed to a "middling active" might be a nerf, and it's another spell for Protoss which already has to manage so many spellcasters.


The Carrier seems ridiculously good now. Why be reluctant about its viability when it has clearly been buffed? I'm on the fence about Immortals too, but I think overall its a decent change. The only thing that concerns me is that in the changes video, clearly all 4 of those Immortals were going to die. Against what, 6 tanks? If that's true, that's horrible, but I'm willing to wait and see. And Protoss isn't the only race to get new abilities. Herc and Ravager are activated abilities too.

Protoss is already referred to as an a-move race, and while that reputation isn't really deserved, it would be wrong to pretend that another spellcaster is a burden.


The Carrier is also infrequently seen in games due to its inaccessibility and riskiness. My original point is that Protoss got all these early to mid game nerfs, opponent buffs, plus the economy is accelerated leaving Protoss further in the dust. Now is a perfect opportunity to revamp the Gateway units.


How about a stasis ability for the carriers to counter mech and give the unit another function, apart from diverting fire from thors and possibly cyclones? The sentry could be buffed a little when it comes to health and damage too, in order to make gateway compositions stronger in smaller numbers/when forcefields get broken by ravagers.


I like the idea of buffing the Sentry, FFs are less of a show stopper and for a 100 gas that needs to mean a little more these days. Zealots still seem deficient to me; Zealot Charge is anti-micro and BW Legs were way better to watch. Baseline Zealots were faster in BW too, actually making the basic unit dynamic a little more balanced that it's ever been in SC2.


Maybe the upgrade could just affect their regular speed, but to a greater extent, making the zealots about as quick as DT:s when their speed change was being considered. With some more health as well for the unit, we could see some interesting micro on both ends, not allowing the zealots to get super close and good surface area without any control from the protoss.
Cogito, ergo toss.
LoneYoShi
Profile Blog Joined June 2014
France1348 Posts
November 11 2014 15:51 GMT
#389
On November 12 2014 00:38 ClueClueClue wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 11 2014 23:16 Cloak wrote:
On November 11 2014 22:51 ClueClueClue wrote:
On November 11 2014 22:44 Cloak wrote:
On November 09 2014 06:06 CoraBlue wrote:
I'm reluctant on Carrier's future viability, it just sounds great on paper and even if it is broken, it will be the first unit to be reverted to its original form and left to rot. The Immortal verdict is still out but something tells me a "strong passive" changed to a "middling active" might be a nerf, and it's another spell for Protoss which already has to manage so many spellcasters.


The Carrier seems ridiculously good now. Why be reluctant about its viability when it has clearly been buffed? I'm on the fence about Immortals too, but I think overall its a decent change. The only thing that concerns me is that in the changes video, clearly all 4 of those Immortals were going to die. Against what, 6 tanks? If that's true, that's horrible, but I'm willing to wait and see. And Protoss isn't the only race to get new abilities. Herc and Ravager are activated abilities too.

Protoss is already referred to as an a-move race, and while that reputation isn't really deserved, it would be wrong to pretend that another spellcaster is a burden.


The Carrier is also infrequently seen in games due to its inaccessibility and riskiness. My original point is that Protoss got all these early to mid game nerfs, opponent buffs, plus the economy is accelerated leaving Protoss further in the dust. Now is a perfect opportunity to revamp the Gateway units.


How about a stasis ability for the carriers to counter mech and give the unit another function, apart from diverting fire from thors and possibly cyclones? The sentry could be buffed a little when it comes to health and damage too, in order to make gateway compositions stronger in smaller numbers/when forcefields get broken by ravagers.


I like the idea of buffing the Sentry, FFs are less of a show stopper and for a 100 gas that needs to mean a little more these days. Zealots still seem deficient to me; Zealot Charge is anti-micro and BW Legs were way better to watch. Baseline Zealots were faster in BW too, actually making the basic unit dynamic a little more balanced that it's ever been in SC2.


Maybe the upgrade could just affect their regular speed, but to a greater extent, making the zealots about as quick as DT:s when their speed change was being considered. With some more health as well for the unit, we could see some interesting micro on both ends, not allowing the zealots to get super close and good surface area without any control from the protoss.

If I remember correctly when they made sure that charging zealot did at least one hit to kiting units, their rationale was to avoid having the zealots kited to death by marauders with the protoss player absolutely unable to do anything. IMO they fixed it in a bad way (making sure the Zealots hit once, but still not requiring any action from the P side). But with your suggestion, I can only imagine the frustration of a protoss player seeing his zealot tank getting kited to death withouth landing a single blow...
MilkDud
Profile Joined June 2013
Canada73 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-11-11 16:00:10
November 11 2014 15:57 GMT
#390
On November 09 2014 01:55 Ramiz1989 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 09 2014 01:42 Tzyx wrote:
Is there a vod for the other showmatches or was the TvZ the only one so far?



Even though it isn't on English, it is much better than the first one in my opinion. Showing some crazy stuff.


Uugh. Swarmhosts are much worse now. How is a Zerg supposed to deal with the protoss death ball without them? I'd like to see flying locusts be able to attack from the air, and/or hit air units.

Lurkers also seems kinda useless. Hopefully Blizzard buffs some things. Oh and ravagers are completely useless vs anything that can move. I can see them useful for breaking static D though.

ClueClueClue
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
Sweden1203 Posts
November 11 2014 16:40 GMT
#391
On November 12 2014 00:51 LoneYoShi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2014 00:38 ClueClueClue wrote:
On November 11 2014 23:16 Cloak wrote:
On November 11 2014 22:51 ClueClueClue wrote:
On November 11 2014 22:44 Cloak wrote:
On November 09 2014 06:06 CoraBlue wrote:
I'm reluctant on Carrier's future viability, it just sounds great on paper and even if it is broken, it will be the first unit to be reverted to its original form and left to rot. The Immortal verdict is still out but something tells me a "strong passive" changed to a "middling active" might be a nerf, and it's another spell for Protoss which already has to manage so many spellcasters.


The Carrier seems ridiculously good now. Why be reluctant about its viability when it has clearly been buffed? I'm on the fence about Immortals too, but I think overall its a decent change. The only thing that concerns me is that in the changes video, clearly all 4 of those Immortals were going to die. Against what, 6 tanks? If that's true, that's horrible, but I'm willing to wait and see. And Protoss isn't the only race to get new abilities. Herc and Ravager are activated abilities too.

Protoss is already referred to as an a-move race, and while that reputation isn't really deserved, it would be wrong to pretend that another spellcaster is a burden.


The Carrier is also infrequently seen in games due to its inaccessibility and riskiness. My original point is that Protoss got all these early to mid game nerfs, opponent buffs, plus the economy is accelerated leaving Protoss further in the dust. Now is a perfect opportunity to revamp the Gateway units.


How about a stasis ability for the carriers to counter mech and give the unit another function, apart from diverting fire from thors and possibly cyclones? The sentry could be buffed a little when it comes to health and damage too, in order to make gateway compositions stronger in smaller numbers/when forcefields get broken by ravagers.


I like the idea of buffing the Sentry, FFs are less of a show stopper and for a 100 gas that needs to mean a little more these days. Zealots still seem deficient to me; Zealot Charge is anti-micro and BW Legs were way better to watch. Baseline Zealots were faster in BW too, actually making the basic unit dynamic a little more balanced that it's ever been in SC2.


Maybe the upgrade could just affect their regular speed, but to a greater extent, making the zealots about as quick as DT:s when their speed change was being considered. With some more health as well for the unit, we could see some interesting micro on both ends, not allowing the zealots to get super close and good surface area without any control from the protoss.

If I remember correctly when they made sure that charging zealot did at least one hit to kiting units, their rationale was to avoid having the zealots kited to death by marauders with the protoss player absolutely unable to do anything. IMO they fixed it in a bad way (making sure the Zealots hit once, but still not requiring any action from the P side). But with your suggestion, I can only imagine the frustration of a protoss player seeing his zealot tank getting kited to death withouth landing a single blow...


Well, the higher movement speed would also mean that zealots move quicker while affected by concussive shell. Sure, they would still be kiteable, but also better at escaping marauders, since the charge doesn't help out when you're running away from units, rather than towards them.
Cogito, ergo toss.
Cloak
Profile Joined October 2009
United States816 Posts
November 11 2014 17:45 GMT
#392
On November 12 2014 00:51 LoneYoShi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 12 2014 00:38 ClueClueClue wrote:
On November 11 2014 23:16 Cloak wrote:
On November 11 2014 22:51 ClueClueClue wrote:
On November 11 2014 22:44 Cloak wrote:
On November 09 2014 06:06 CoraBlue wrote:
I'm reluctant on Carrier's future viability, it just sounds great on paper and even if it is broken, it will be the first unit to be reverted to its original form and left to rot. The Immortal verdict is still out but something tells me a "strong passive" changed to a "middling active" might be a nerf, and it's another spell for Protoss which already has to manage so many spellcasters.


The Carrier seems ridiculously good now. Why be reluctant about its viability when it has clearly been buffed? I'm on the fence about Immortals too, but I think overall its a decent change. The only thing that concerns me is that in the changes video, clearly all 4 of those Immortals were going to die. Against what, 6 tanks? If that's true, that's horrible, but I'm willing to wait and see. And Protoss isn't the only race to get new abilities. Herc and Ravager are activated abilities too.

Protoss is already referred to as an a-move race, and while that reputation isn't really deserved, it would be wrong to pretend that another spellcaster is a burden.


The Carrier is also infrequently seen in games due to its inaccessibility and riskiness. My original point is that Protoss got all these early to mid game nerfs, opponent buffs, plus the economy is accelerated leaving Protoss further in the dust. Now is a perfect opportunity to revamp the Gateway units.


How about a stasis ability for the carriers to counter mech and give the unit another function, apart from diverting fire from thors and possibly cyclones? The sentry could be buffed a little when it comes to health and damage too, in order to make gateway compositions stronger in smaller numbers/when forcefields get broken by ravagers.


I like the idea of buffing the Sentry, FFs are less of a show stopper and for a 100 gas that needs to mean a little more these days. Zealots still seem deficient to me; Zealot Charge is anti-micro and BW Legs were way better to watch. Baseline Zealots were faster in BW too, actually making the basic unit dynamic a little more balanced that it's ever been in SC2.


Maybe the upgrade could just affect their regular speed, but to a greater extent, making the zealots about as quick as DT:s when their speed change was being considered. With some more health as well for the unit, we could see some interesting micro on both ends, not allowing the zealots to get super close and good surface area without any control from the protoss.

If I remember correctly when they made sure that charging zealot did at least one hit to kiting units, their rationale was to avoid having the zealots kited to death by marauders with the protoss player absolutely unable to do anything. IMO they fixed it in a bad way (making sure the Zealots hit once, but still not requiring any action from the P side). But with your suggestion, I can only imagine the frustration of a protoss player seeing his zealot tank getting kited to death withouth landing a single blow...


Well, the speed should be adjusted with concussive in mind or partial snare resistance where Zealots slightly gain on a kiting Marauder but he can escape with full retreat on Stim.
The more you know, the less you understand.
Foxxan
Profile Joined October 2004
Sweden3427 Posts
November 11 2014 18:18 GMT
#393
Maybe its possible to add some kind of dispel on sentinel?
Prev 1 18 19 20 All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 4h 3m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ByuN 550
IndyStarCraft 222
Railgan 106
BRAT_OK 79
MindelVK 31
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 3102
Mini 864
EffOrt 498
Jaedong 468
ggaemo 231
Soulkey 228
sorry 18
Dota 2
Pyrionflax216
LuMiX1
League of Legends
Doublelift1875
Counter-Strike
fl0m5323
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu384
Other Games
tarik_tv6768
Grubby2711
ceh9705
Beastyqt627
Mlord462
B2W.Neo325
UpATreeSC234
ArmadaUGS152
XaKoH 143
JuggernautJason131
Livibee59
Trikslyr58
SteadfastSC55
ODPixel44
OptimusSC23
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 4
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• TFBlade1153
Other Games
• imaqtpie717
• Shiphtur455
• WagamamaTV232
Upcoming Events
OSC
4h 3m
CrankTV Team League
15h 3m
Replay Cast
1d 4h
CrankTV Team League
1d 15h
Big Brain Bouts
1d 20h
Soulspirit vs goblin
TriGGeR vs Bunny
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
Serral vs SHIN
herO vs Solar
Online Event
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
Clem vs ByuN
Rogue vs Lambo
OSC
3 days
WardiTV Weekly
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
PiGosaur Cup
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
Patches Events
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-07-21
HSC XXIX
Eternal Conflict S2 E3

Ongoing

CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
Proleague 2026-07-22
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
SCTL 2026 Spring
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: W4
ASL S22 SEASON OPEN Day 2
Escore Tournament S3: W5
ASL Season 22: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 22: Qualifier #2
CSLAN 4
ASL Season 22
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
Light Tournament 2026
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
Logitech G Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.