|
On January 28 2014 07:51 Nesto wrote: man, Jaedong is gonna be pissed.
Well if MKP comes back he won't have to worry about Konging it up anymore 
On a serious note, I'm pretty excited. It's something new and no one is forcing anyone to play. Good luck to all!!
|
What an awful tournament format. I hope they back down from this.
|
wow i guess IEM feels like they will have given out enough money by then, so why not throw a YOLO SWAG money for a change, just for the heck of it..
well they better make sure that this happens only once..
|
On January 28 2014 07:58 Drmooose wrote:Well if MKP comes back he won't have to worry about Konging it up anymore  On a serious note, I'm pretty excited. It's something new and no one is forcing anyone to play. Good luck to all!!
As has been stated before, the season is basically half-way finished. Players already signed up and qualified have been forced into this situation.
|
On January 28 2014 07:58 Drmooose wrote:Well if MKP comes back he won't have to worry about Konging it up anymore  On a serious note, I'm pretty excited. It's something new and no one is forcing anyone to play. Good luck to all!! It's about the money that people won't be making. Not vice versa.
The money is supposed to bring up the hype, but like many people are saying, it might backfire and make the tournament a lot more boring than a normal IEM.
|
On January 28 2014 07:56 Darkhoarse wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2014 07:52 IncubusSC wrote:On January 28 2014 07:43 WolfintheSheep wrote:On January 28 2014 07:41 IncubusSC wrote: This uproar just goes to show how phobic to change a large portion of this community is. Something unique gets presented and all these people get scared and nestle up inside their little imaginary safety bubbles. How about Winner takes nothing, and 2-16 take all. That's actually a unique idea. If you hate that, clearly you're scared and huddled in your safety bubble. You sound a little mad. You a little mad? What an excellent addition to intelligent debate.
As opposed to a bunch of NON-competitors whining about one single tournament being different than every other one.
|
United States23455 Posts
On January 28 2014 08:04 IncubusSC wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2014 07:56 Darkhoarse wrote:On January 28 2014 07:52 IncubusSC wrote:On January 28 2014 07:43 WolfintheSheep wrote:On January 28 2014 07:41 IncubusSC wrote: This uproar just goes to show how phobic to change a large portion of this community is. Something unique gets presented and all these people get scared and nestle up inside their little imaginary safety bubbles. How about Winner takes nothing, and 2-16 take all. That's actually a unique idea. If you hate that, clearly you're scared and huddled in your safety bubble. You sound a little mad. You a little mad? What an excellent addition to intelligent debate. As opposed to a bunch of NON-competitors whining about one single tournament being different than every other one. At least they expressed some reasoning as to why they thought it was bad rather than going with, "You a little mad?"
|
On January 28 2014 07:55 Darkhoarse wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2014 07:50 Mifoi123 wrote:1. The secure source of income for sc2 players is: WCS AM, WCS EU and GSL. Check! 2. IEM creates a new tournament with the best 16 players for the fans to watch. Check! 3. IEM injects $100K in the sc2 scene. Check! 4. IEM tries something new. Check! 5. Everyone is talking about it and that is creating HYPE. Check! 6. Carmac is a genius imo! Check!  7. SC2 fans are unhappy? Wait what? I am HYPED! :D Note: Look at it differently... If this tournament does not happen then nobody would mention the fact that those 16 players get nothing. Now 1 of those 16 players will get $100K, how cool is that! :D 1. this source of income is really just okay, not all that secure. 2. This tournament has existed for a few years. Also, they might not end up with "the best 16 players for the fans to watch" 3. once again, this 100k prize pool tournament has already existed 4. No argument here, it's new! 5. Any press is good press, but this is only partially hype and partially serious issues with how the tournament will be run 6. This is a weird thing to have on this list. 7. Yeah some people are because they want to maintain a fairly large base of players who can support themselves.
Response to your 7. If there are too many pro-players it's diluting the gains of other players. If there are too few then the viewers are lacking diversity of play, i get that. So what is the right number? IDK, do you? A lot of poorly paid players or a few best that gets all the money? I vote for the ladder because I don't have 165hours per week to watch all the games.
|
United States23455 Posts
On January 28 2014 08:05 Mifoi123 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2014 07:55 Darkhoarse wrote:On January 28 2014 07:50 Mifoi123 wrote:1. The secure source of income for sc2 players is: WCS AM, WCS EU and GSL. Check! 2. IEM creates a new tournament with the best 16 players for the fans to watch. Check! 3. IEM injects $100K in the sc2 scene. Check! 4. IEM tries something new. Check! 5. Everyone is talking about it and that is creating HYPE. Check! 6. Carmac is a genius imo! Check!  7. SC2 fans are unhappy? Wait what? I am HYPED! :D Note: Look at it differently... If this tournament does not happen then nobody would mention the fact that those 16 players get nothing. Now 1 of those 16 players will get $100K, how cool is that! :D 1. this source of income is really just okay, not all that secure. 2. This tournament has existed for a few years. Also, they might not end up with "the best 16 players for the fans to watch" 3. once again, this 100k prize pool tournament has already existed 4. No argument here, it's new! 5. Any press is good press, but this is only partially hype and partially serious issues with how the tournament will be run 6. This is a weird thing to have on this list. 7. Yeah some people are because they want to maintain a fairly large base of players who can support themselves. Response to your 7. If there are too many pro-players it's diluting the gains of other players. If there are too few then the viewers are lacking diversity of play, i get that. So what is the right number? IDK, do you? A lot of poorly paid players or a few best that gets all the money? I vote for the ladder because I don't have 165hours per week to watch all the games. I don't know the right number of players, but I'd sure love for the Korea scene to be able to support teamleagues and have full GSL's of 32 in Code S and 48 in Code A.
|
On January 28 2014 08:05 Darkhoarse wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2014 08:04 IncubusSC wrote:On January 28 2014 07:56 Darkhoarse wrote:On January 28 2014 07:52 IncubusSC wrote:On January 28 2014 07:43 WolfintheSheep wrote:On January 28 2014 07:41 IncubusSC wrote: This uproar just goes to show how phobic to change a large portion of this community is. Something unique gets presented and all these people get scared and nestle up inside their little imaginary safety bubbles. How about Winner takes nothing, and 2-16 take all. That's actually a unique idea. If you hate that, clearly you're scared and huddled in your safety bubble. You sound a little mad. You a little mad? What an excellent addition to intelligent debate. As opposed to a bunch of NON-competitors whining about one single tournament being different than every other one. At least they expressed some reasoning as to why they thought it was bad rather than going with, "You a little mad?"
I don't see the need to put in any concerted effort into arguing with kids over the internet about a video game haha.
|
That Prize Pool section of the page is both hilarious and depressing all at the same time. lol
|
I love it. I love everything about it. No, the players are not victims for getting this opportunity. No, I don't think that there will be competitors who will not try their hardest to take the number one spot, raise that trophy and have his name written in the history book as the guy who won the Winner Only $100.000 Tournament (money-splitting does not change that). The coolest motherfucker is about to get crowned. I'll watch that shit.
And my favourite Maltese gets things right:
On January 28 2014 05:23 mikkmagro wrote: People forget that ESL was for a long time a big advocate for not having a top heavy prizepool for their regular circuit events. It is still that way for all their global championships, just not for the World Championship, which is one event.
As for helping progamers make money, ESL is the organiser with the largest span of countries in which they organise events in as many continents and for as many scenes as possible. Singapore, Brazil, Ukraine...they go EVERYWHERE, and they always invite the 'local champion' directly into the tournament to give people a hometown favourite. They provide qualifiers for all the regions, including Taiwan, Oceania, etc to make sure everyone has a shot.
Apart from that, they organise hundreds of smaller regional and local tournaments such as the ESL Euro Series, the EPS in Germany and Spain, weekly and monthly cups etc.
So really, they deserve no criticism at all from that front. They're just doing one event differently.
|
United States23455 Posts
On January 28 2014 08:08 IncubusSC wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2014 08:05 Darkhoarse wrote:On January 28 2014 08:04 IncubusSC wrote:On January 28 2014 07:56 Darkhoarse wrote:On January 28 2014 07:52 IncubusSC wrote:On January 28 2014 07:43 WolfintheSheep wrote:On January 28 2014 07:41 IncubusSC wrote: This uproar just goes to show how phobic to change a large portion of this community is. Something unique gets presented and all these people get scared and nestle up inside their little imaginary safety bubbles. How about Winner takes nothing, and 2-16 take all. That's actually a unique idea. If you hate that, clearly you're scared and huddled in your safety bubble. You sound a little mad. You a little mad? What an excellent addition to intelligent debate. As opposed to a bunch of NON-competitors whining about one single tournament being different than every other one. At least they expressed some reasoning as to why they thought it was bad rather than going with, "You a little mad?" I don't see the need to put in any concerted effort into arguing with kids over the internet about a video game haha. If you actually felt that way you wouldn't have started doing it. And you certainly wouldn't still be doing it right now.
|
I will probably end up watching this tourney, but there's a lot of stupid stuff with it. No Terrans so far (probably gonna invite 2 Terrans if I had to guess), huge prize pool that goes to one person, tiny player pool, single elimination, etc.
Pretty cool initiative from ESL, but I wish that they had chosen a slightly different format. Maybe more like a Red Bull BG format where the prize money was more evenly distributed where even the lowest players got decent money. I understand the winner takes all "world champion" mentality, but I don't think you can do that in a game like SC2.
|
On January 28 2014 08:11 Darkhoarse wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2014 08:08 IncubusSC wrote:On January 28 2014 08:05 Darkhoarse wrote:On January 28 2014 08:04 IncubusSC wrote:On January 28 2014 07:56 Darkhoarse wrote:On January 28 2014 07:52 IncubusSC wrote:On January 28 2014 07:43 WolfintheSheep wrote:On January 28 2014 07:41 IncubusSC wrote: This uproar just goes to show how phobic to change a large portion of this community is. Something unique gets presented and all these people get scared and nestle up inside their little imaginary safety bubbles. How about Winner takes nothing, and 2-16 take all. That's actually a unique idea. If you hate that, clearly you're scared and huddled in your safety bubble. You sound a little mad. You a little mad? What an excellent addition to intelligent debate. As opposed to a bunch of NON-competitors whining about one single tournament being different than every other one. At least they expressed some reasoning as to why they thought it was bad rather than going with, "You a little mad?" I don't see the need to put in any concerted effort into arguing with kids over the internet about a video game haha. If you actually felt that way you wouldn't have started doing it. And you certainly wouldn't still be doing it right now.
Yeah, because the message I've sent so far have been such a strain on my energy lol.
|
United States23455 Posts
On January 28 2014 08:14 IncubusSC wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2014 08:11 Darkhoarse wrote:On January 28 2014 08:08 IncubusSC wrote:On January 28 2014 08:05 Darkhoarse wrote:On January 28 2014 08:04 IncubusSC wrote:On January 28 2014 07:56 Darkhoarse wrote:On January 28 2014 07:52 IncubusSC wrote:On January 28 2014 07:43 WolfintheSheep wrote:On January 28 2014 07:41 IncubusSC wrote: This uproar just goes to show how phobic to change a large portion of this community is. Something unique gets presented and all these people get scared and nestle up inside their little imaginary safety bubbles. How about Winner takes nothing, and 2-16 take all. That's actually a unique idea. If you hate that, clearly you're scared and huddled in your safety bubble. You sound a little mad. You a little mad? What an excellent addition to intelligent debate. As opposed to a bunch of NON-competitors whining about one single tournament being different than every other one. At least they expressed some reasoning as to why they thought it was bad rather than going with, "You a little mad?" I don't see the need to put in any concerted effort into arguing with kids over the internet about a video game haha. If you actually felt that way you wouldn't have started doing it. And you certainly wouldn't still be doing it right now. Yeah, because the message I've sent so far have been such a strain on my energy lol. Haha whatever man. But you are sitting in front of your computer refreshing the page to see my replies and respond to them, so you can go ahead and drop the "I'm too cool for this shit" act. Or don't totally your call.
|
Wow this is ridiculous. I get why they're doing it but really the reasons for why they are aren't as valid as the reasons for why they shouldn't.
100k as well... that's equal to the single highest prize in SC2, the WCS Globals. 50k I could kinda get behind but... still.
|
On January 28 2014 08:14 IncubusSC wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2014 08:11 Darkhoarse wrote:On January 28 2014 08:08 IncubusSC wrote:On January 28 2014 08:05 Darkhoarse wrote:On January 28 2014 08:04 IncubusSC wrote:On January 28 2014 07:56 Darkhoarse wrote:On January 28 2014 07:52 IncubusSC wrote:On January 28 2014 07:43 WolfintheSheep wrote:On January 28 2014 07:41 IncubusSC wrote: This uproar just goes to show how phobic to change a large portion of this community is. Something unique gets presented and all these people get scared and nestle up inside their little imaginary safety bubbles. How about Winner takes nothing, and 2-16 take all. That's actually a unique idea. If you hate that, clearly you're scared and huddled in your safety bubble. You sound a little mad. You a little mad? What an excellent addition to intelligent debate. As opposed to a bunch of NON-competitors whining about one single tournament being different than every other one. At least they expressed some reasoning as to why they thought it was bad rather than going with, "You a little mad?" I don't see the need to put in any concerted effort into arguing with kids over the internet about a video game haha. If you actually felt that way you wouldn't have started doing it. And you certainly wouldn't still be doing it right now. Yeah, because the message I've sent so far have been such a strain on my energy lol. Growing old is natural. Growing up is optional.
|
On January 28 2014 08:05 Mifoi123 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2014 07:55 Darkhoarse wrote:On January 28 2014 07:50 Mifoi123 wrote:1. The secure source of income for sc2 players is: WCS AM, WCS EU and GSL. Check! 2. IEM creates a new tournament with the best 16 players for the fans to watch. Check! 3. IEM injects $100K in the sc2 scene. Check! 4. IEM tries something new. Check! 5. Everyone is talking about it and that is creating HYPE. Check! 6. Carmac is a genius imo! Check!  7. SC2 fans are unhappy? Wait what? I am HYPED! :D Note: Look at it differently... If this tournament does not happen then nobody would mention the fact that those 16 players get nothing. Now 1 of those 16 players will get $100K, how cool is that! :D 1. this source of income is really just okay, not all that secure. 2. This tournament has existed for a few years. Also, they might not end up with "the best 16 players for the fans to watch" 3. once again, this 100k prize pool tournament has already existed 4. No argument here, it's new! 5. Any press is good press, but this is only partially hype and partially serious issues with how the tournament will be run 6. This is a weird thing to have on this list. 7. Yeah some people are because they want to maintain a fairly large base of players who can support themselves. Response to your 7. If there are too many pro-players it's diluting the gains of other players. If there are too few then the viewers are lacking diversity of play, i get that. So what is the right number? IDK, do you? A lot of poorly paid players or a few best that gets all the money? I vote for the ladder because I don't have 165hours per week to watch all the games. The scene has already cracked down on their overpopulation. There are still improvements to see, but this tournament does the opposite of improve upon this.
You don't have 165 hours per week to watch, but you some people are free to watch on Mondays, others on Thursdays, and others on Sundays etc. you're not the only one in the world. Also, not every tournament has everyone's favorite players. Seeing your favorite play with the best is important to a lot if people, but if your favorite player has to retire because of shitty decisions like this, you'll be a sad panda.
|
I think a lot of the people complaining need to take a step back and look at all the positive things IEM have done for SC2. They have done a shitload for the scene and for SC2 players in general. They have stuck by the game despite it now being pretty minor compared to other games.
Reading people say how they don't care about players is complete bullshit. They still have plenty of prize money to go around outside of this event and ultimately this money still goes to the players. If this helps them build their reputation and that of SC2 who the fuck are we or anyone in the scene to complain? This is a damn good thing for the scene as is the discussion it has generated.
The hate here is totally misplaced.
On January 28 2014 08:02 Shinta) wrote:Show nested quote +On January 28 2014 07:58 Drmooose wrote:On January 28 2014 07:51 Nesto wrote: man, Jaedong is gonna be pissed. Well if MKP comes back he won't have to worry about Konging it up anymore  On a serious note, I'm pretty excited. It's something new and no one is forcing anyone to play. Good luck to all!! It's about the money that people won't be making. Not vice versa. The money is supposed to bring up the hype, but like many people are saying, it might backfire and make the tournament a lot more boring than a normal IEM.
That's not even a remote possibility, that's just the usual people trying to be as negative as possible about anything that happens in the SC2 scene. Have a look how much interest this has generated already even if a fair bit is negative. It has people talking about IEM at a time when really they have been slightly forgotten.
IEM has basically taken a backseat to dreamhack. They are also competing with other esports events and decided to try something different. So far it's working and i have no problem with it.
|
|
|
|