• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:20
CEST 15:20
KST 22:20
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21 - Finalists4Team TLMC #5: Vote to Decide Ladder Maps!0[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt1: Mile High15Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments2[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence10
Community News
herO joins T117Artosis vs Ret Showmatch26Classic wins RSL Revival Season 22Weekly Cups (Sept 15-21): herO Goes For Four2SC2 5.0.15 PTR Patch Notes + Sept 22nd update286
StarCraft 2
General
SC2 5.0.15 PTR Patch Notes + Sept 22nd update TL.net Map Contest #21 - Finalists SHIN's Feedback to Current PTR (9/24/2025) Team Liquid jersey signed by the Kespa 8 herO joins T1
Tourneys
Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Prome's Evo #1 - Solar vs Classic (SC: Evo) Monday Nights Weeklies
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 492 Get Out More Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense
Brood War
General
Artosis vs Ret Showmatch ASL20 General Discussion StarCraft 1 Beta Test (Video) Whose hotkey signature is this? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro8 Day 1 [ASL20] Ro8 Day 2 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread The XBox Thread Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Big Programming Thread Trading/Investing Thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
TL Chill? More like Zero Ch…
Peanutsc
Try to reverse getting fired …
Garnet
[ASL20] Players bad at pi…
pullarius1
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1182 users

IEM World Championship to be Winner Takes All for $100,000…

Forum Index > SC2 General
1003 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 27 28 29 30 31 51 Next
Drmooose
Profile Joined March 2011
United States390 Posts
January 27 2014 22:58 GMT
#561
On January 28 2014 07:51 Nesto wrote:
man, Jaedong is gonna be pissed.


Well if MKP comes back he won't have to worry about Konging it up anymore

On a serious note, I'm pretty excited. It's something new and no one is forcing anyone to play. Good luck to all!!
I have a question...
ManicMarine
Profile Joined April 2011
Australia409 Posts
January 27 2014 23:00 GMT
#562
What an awful tournament format. I hope they back down from this.
Manic by name, Manic by nature.
dyDrawer
Profile Joined September 2012
Canada438 Posts
January 27 2014 23:01 GMT
#563
wow i guess IEM feels like they will have given out enough money by then, so why not throw a YOLO SWAG money for a change, just for the heck of it..

well they better make sure that this happens only once..
Dear, Rain, PartinG, Trap - "Glory to the Firstborn"
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
January 27 2014 23:02 GMT
#564
On January 28 2014 07:58 Drmooose wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2014 07:51 Nesto wrote:
man, Jaedong is gonna be pissed.


Well if MKP comes back he won't have to worry about Konging it up anymore

On a serious note, I'm pretty excited. It's something new and no one is forcing anyone to play. Good luck to all!!


As has been stated before, the season is basically half-way finished. Players already signed up and qualified have been forced into this situation.
Average means I'm better than half of you.
Shinta)
Profile Joined July 2010
United States1716 Posts
January 27 2014 23:02 GMT
#565
On January 28 2014 07:58 Drmooose wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2014 07:51 Nesto wrote:
man, Jaedong is gonna be pissed.


Well if MKP comes back he won't have to worry about Konging it up anymore

On a serious note, I'm pretty excited. It's something new and no one is forcing anyone to play. Good luck to all!!

It's about the money that people won't be making. Not vice versa.

The money is supposed to bring up the hype, but like many people are saying, it might backfire and make the tournament a lot more boring than a normal IEM.
Suteki Da Ne 素敵だね Isn't it Wonderful
IncubusSC
Profile Joined December 2013
Canada57 Posts
January 27 2014 23:04 GMT
#566
On January 28 2014 07:56 Darkhoarse wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2014 07:52 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:43 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:41 IncubusSC wrote:
This uproar just goes to show how phobic to change a large portion of this community is. Something unique gets presented and all these people get scared and nestle up inside their little imaginary safety bubbles.

How about Winner takes nothing, and 2-16 take all.

That's actually a unique idea. If you hate that, clearly you're scared and huddled in your safety bubble.


You sound a little mad. You a little mad?

What an excellent addition to intelligent debate.


As opposed to a bunch of NON-competitors whining about one single tournament being different than every other one.
"Growing old is natural, growing up is optional."
Darkhorse
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
United States23455 Posts
January 27 2014 23:05 GMT
#567
On January 28 2014 08:04 IncubusSC wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2014 07:56 Darkhoarse wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:52 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:43 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:41 IncubusSC wrote:
This uproar just goes to show how phobic to change a large portion of this community is. Something unique gets presented and all these people get scared and nestle up inside their little imaginary safety bubbles.

How about Winner takes nothing, and 2-16 take all.

That's actually a unique idea. If you hate that, clearly you're scared and huddled in your safety bubble.


You sound a little mad. You a little mad?

What an excellent addition to intelligent debate.


As opposed to a bunch of NON-competitors whining about one single tournament being different than every other one.

At least they expressed some reasoning as to why they thought it was bad rather than going with, "You a little mad?"
WriterRecently Necro'd (?)
Mifoi123
Profile Joined May 2013
Canada42 Posts
January 27 2014 23:05 GMT
#568
On January 28 2014 07:55 Darkhoarse wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2014 07:50 Mifoi123 wrote:
1. The secure source of income for sc2 players is: WCS AM, WCS EU and GSL. Check!
2. IEM creates a new tournament with the best 16 players for the fans to watch. Check!
3. IEM injects $100K in the sc2 scene. Check!
4. IEM tries something new. Check!
5. Everyone is talking about it and that is creating HYPE. Check!
6. Carmac is a genius imo! Check!
7. SC2 fans are unhappy? Wait what? I am HYPED! :D

Note: Look at it differently... If this tournament does not happen then nobody would mention the fact that those 16 players get nothing. Now 1 of those 16 players will get $100K, how cool is that! :D

1. this source of income is really just okay, not all that secure.
2. This tournament has existed for a few years. Also, they might not end up with "the best 16 players for the fans to watch"
3. once again, this 100k prize pool tournament has already existed
4. No argument here, it's new!
5. Any press is good press, but this is only partially hype and partially serious issues with how the tournament will be run
6. This is a weird thing to have on this list.
7. Yeah some people are because they want to maintain a fairly large base of players who can support themselves.


Response to your 7. If there are too many pro-players it's diluting the gains of other players. If there are too few then the viewers are lacking diversity of play, i get that. So what is the right number? IDK, do you? A lot of poorly paid players or a few best that gets all the money? I vote for the ladder because I don't have 165hours per week to watch all the games.
I'd like to help! :)
Darkhorse
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
United States23455 Posts
January 27 2014 23:08 GMT
#569
On January 28 2014 08:05 Mifoi123 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2014 07:55 Darkhoarse wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:50 Mifoi123 wrote:
1. The secure source of income for sc2 players is: WCS AM, WCS EU and GSL. Check!
2. IEM creates a new tournament with the best 16 players for the fans to watch. Check!
3. IEM injects $100K in the sc2 scene. Check!
4. IEM tries something new. Check!
5. Everyone is talking about it and that is creating HYPE. Check!
6. Carmac is a genius imo! Check!
7. SC2 fans are unhappy? Wait what? I am HYPED! :D

Note: Look at it differently... If this tournament does not happen then nobody would mention the fact that those 16 players get nothing. Now 1 of those 16 players will get $100K, how cool is that! :D

1. this source of income is really just okay, not all that secure.
2. This tournament has existed for a few years. Also, they might not end up with "the best 16 players for the fans to watch"
3. once again, this 100k prize pool tournament has already existed
4. No argument here, it's new!
5. Any press is good press, but this is only partially hype and partially serious issues with how the tournament will be run
6. This is a weird thing to have on this list.
7. Yeah some people are because they want to maintain a fairly large base of players who can support themselves.


Response to your 7. If there are too many pro-players it's diluting the gains of other players. If there are too few then the viewers are lacking diversity of play, i get that. So what is the right number? IDK, do you? A lot of poorly paid players or a few best that gets all the money? I vote for the ladder because I don't have 165hours per week to watch all the games.

I don't know the right number of players, but I'd sure love for the Korea scene to be able to support teamleagues and have full GSL's of 32 in Code S and 48 in Code A.
WriterRecently Necro'd (?)
IncubusSC
Profile Joined December 2013
Canada57 Posts
January 27 2014 23:08 GMT
#570
On January 28 2014 08:05 Darkhoarse wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2014 08:04 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:56 Darkhoarse wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:52 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:43 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:41 IncubusSC wrote:
This uproar just goes to show how phobic to change a large portion of this community is. Something unique gets presented and all these people get scared and nestle up inside their little imaginary safety bubbles.

How about Winner takes nothing, and 2-16 take all.

That's actually a unique idea. If you hate that, clearly you're scared and huddled in your safety bubble.


You sound a little mad. You a little mad?

What an excellent addition to intelligent debate.


As opposed to a bunch of NON-competitors whining about one single tournament being different than every other one.

At least they expressed some reasoning as to why they thought it was bad rather than going with, "You a little mad?"


I don't see the need to put in any concerted effort into arguing with kids over the internet about a video game haha.
"Growing old is natural, growing up is optional."
SamuraiX-
Profile Joined January 2013
United States52 Posts
January 27 2014 23:10 GMT
#571
On January 28 2014 07:46 Paragleiber wrote:

Of course some people are already qualified.

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/IEM_Season_VIII_-_World_Championship


That Prize Pool section of the page is both hilarious and depressing all at the same time. lol
Bomber | Mvp | MMA – Life | Jaedong | Soulkey – Rain | Creator | Seed
AlternativeEgo
Profile Joined August 2011
Sweden17309 Posts
January 27 2014 23:10 GMT
#572
I love it. I love everything about it. No, the players are not victims for getting this opportunity. No, I don't think that there will be competitors who will not try their hardest to take the number one spot, raise that trophy and have his name written in the history book as the guy who won the Winner Only $100.000 Tournament (money-splitting does not change that). The coolest motherfucker is about to get crowned. I'll watch that shit.

And my favourite Maltese gets things right:

On January 28 2014 05:23 mikkmagro wrote:
People forget that ESL was for a long time a big advocate for not having a top heavy prizepool for their regular circuit events. It is still that way for all their global championships, just not for the World Championship, which is one event.

As for helping progamers make money, ESL is the organiser with the largest span of countries in which they organise events in as many continents and for as many scenes as possible. Singapore, Brazil, Ukraine...they go EVERYWHERE, and they always invite the 'local champion' directly into the tournament to give people a hometown favourite. They provide qualifiers for all the regions, including Taiwan, Oceania, etc to make sure everyone has a shot.

Apart from that, they organise hundreds of smaller regional and local tournaments such as the ESL Euro Series, the EPS in Germany and Spain, weekly and monthly cups etc.

So really, they deserve no criticism at all from that front. They're just doing one event differently.

Mark Munoz looks like Gretorp
Darkhorse
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
United States23455 Posts
January 27 2014 23:11 GMT
#573
On January 28 2014 08:08 IncubusSC wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2014 08:05 Darkhoarse wrote:
On January 28 2014 08:04 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:56 Darkhoarse wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:52 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:43 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:41 IncubusSC wrote:
This uproar just goes to show how phobic to change a large portion of this community is. Something unique gets presented and all these people get scared and nestle up inside their little imaginary safety bubbles.

How about Winner takes nothing, and 2-16 take all.

That's actually a unique idea. If you hate that, clearly you're scared and huddled in your safety bubble.


You sound a little mad. You a little mad?

What an excellent addition to intelligent debate.


As opposed to a bunch of NON-competitors whining about one single tournament being different than every other one.

At least they expressed some reasoning as to why they thought it was bad rather than going with, "You a little mad?"


I don't see the need to put in any concerted effort into arguing with kids over the internet about a video game haha.

If you actually felt that way you wouldn't have started doing it. And you certainly wouldn't still be doing it right now.
WriterRecently Necro'd (?)
MtlGuitarist97
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States1539 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-01-27 23:12:37
January 27 2014 23:12 GMT
#574
I will probably end up watching this tourney, but there's a lot of stupid stuff with it. No Terrans so far (probably gonna invite 2 Terrans if I had to guess), huge prize pool that goes to one person, tiny player pool, single elimination, etc.

Pretty cool initiative from ESL, but I wish that they had chosen a slightly different format. Maybe more like a Red Bull BG format where the prize money was more evenly distributed where even the lowest players got decent money. I understand the winner takes all "world champion" mentality, but I don't think you can do that in a game like SC2.
IncubusSC
Profile Joined December 2013
Canada57 Posts
January 27 2014 23:14 GMT
#575
On January 28 2014 08:11 Darkhoarse wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2014 08:08 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 08:05 Darkhoarse wrote:
On January 28 2014 08:04 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:56 Darkhoarse wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:52 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:43 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:41 IncubusSC wrote:
This uproar just goes to show how phobic to change a large portion of this community is. Something unique gets presented and all these people get scared and nestle up inside their little imaginary safety bubbles.

How about Winner takes nothing, and 2-16 take all.

That's actually a unique idea. If you hate that, clearly you're scared and huddled in your safety bubble.


You sound a little mad. You a little mad?

What an excellent addition to intelligent debate.


As opposed to a bunch of NON-competitors whining about one single tournament being different than every other one.

At least they expressed some reasoning as to why they thought it was bad rather than going with, "You a little mad?"


I don't see the need to put in any concerted effort into arguing with kids over the internet about a video game haha.

If you actually felt that way you wouldn't have started doing it. And you certainly wouldn't still be doing it right now.


Yeah, because the message I've sent so far have been such a strain on my energy lol.
"Growing old is natural, growing up is optional."
Darkhorse
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
United States23455 Posts
January 27 2014 23:16 GMT
#576
On January 28 2014 08:14 IncubusSC wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2014 08:11 Darkhoarse wrote:
On January 28 2014 08:08 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 08:05 Darkhoarse wrote:
On January 28 2014 08:04 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:56 Darkhoarse wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:52 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:43 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:41 IncubusSC wrote:
This uproar just goes to show how phobic to change a large portion of this community is. Something unique gets presented and all these people get scared and nestle up inside their little imaginary safety bubbles.

How about Winner takes nothing, and 2-16 take all.

That's actually a unique idea. If you hate that, clearly you're scared and huddled in your safety bubble.


You sound a little mad. You a little mad?

What an excellent addition to intelligent debate.


As opposed to a bunch of NON-competitors whining about one single tournament being different than every other one.

At least they expressed some reasoning as to why they thought it was bad rather than going with, "You a little mad?"


I don't see the need to put in any concerted effort into arguing with kids over the internet about a video game haha.

If you actually felt that way you wouldn't have started doing it. And you certainly wouldn't still be doing it right now.


Yeah, because the message I've sent so far have been such a strain on my energy lol.

Haha whatever man. But you are sitting in front of your computer refreshing the page to see my replies and respond to them, so you can go ahead and drop the "I'm too cool for this shit" act. Or don't totally your call.
WriterRecently Necro'd (?)
Larkin
Profile Blog Joined January 2012
United Kingdom7161 Posts
January 27 2014 23:19 GMT
#577
Wow this is ridiculous. I get why they're doing it but really the reasons for why they are aren't as valid as the reasons for why they shouldn't.

100k as well... that's equal to the single highest prize in SC2, the WCS Globals. 50k I could kinda get behind but... still.
https://www.twitch.tv/ttalarkin - streams random stuff, high level teamleague, maybe even heroleague
Epamynondas
Profile Joined September 2012
387 Posts
January 27 2014 23:19 GMT
#578
On January 28 2014 08:14 IncubusSC wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2014 08:11 Darkhoarse wrote:
On January 28 2014 08:08 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 08:05 Darkhoarse wrote:
On January 28 2014 08:04 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:56 Darkhoarse wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:52 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:43 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:41 IncubusSC wrote:
This uproar just goes to show how phobic to change a large portion of this community is. Something unique gets presented and all these people get scared and nestle up inside their little imaginary safety bubbles.

How about Winner takes nothing, and 2-16 take all.

That's actually a unique idea. If you hate that, clearly you're scared and huddled in your safety bubble.


You sound a little mad. You a little mad?

What an excellent addition to intelligent debate.


As opposed to a bunch of NON-competitors whining about one single tournament being different than every other one.

At least they expressed some reasoning as to why they thought it was bad rather than going with, "You a little mad?"


I don't see the need to put in any concerted effort into arguing with kids over the internet about a video game haha.

If you actually felt that way you wouldn't have started doing it. And you certainly wouldn't still be doing it right now.


Yeah, because the message I've sent so far have been such a strain on my energy lol.

Growing old is natural. Growing up is optional.
Shinta)
Profile Joined July 2010
United States1716 Posts
January 27 2014 23:22 GMT
#579
On January 28 2014 08:05 Mifoi123 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2014 07:55 Darkhoarse wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:50 Mifoi123 wrote:
1. The secure source of income for sc2 players is: WCS AM, WCS EU and GSL. Check!
2. IEM creates a new tournament with the best 16 players for the fans to watch. Check!
3. IEM injects $100K in the sc2 scene. Check!
4. IEM tries something new. Check!
5. Everyone is talking about it and that is creating HYPE. Check!
6. Carmac is a genius imo! Check!
7. SC2 fans are unhappy? Wait what? I am HYPED! :D

Note: Look at it differently... If this tournament does not happen then nobody would mention the fact that those 16 players get nothing. Now 1 of those 16 players will get $100K, how cool is that! :D

1. this source of income is really just okay, not all that secure.
2. This tournament has existed for a few years. Also, they might not end up with "the best 16 players for the fans to watch"
3. once again, this 100k prize pool tournament has already existed
4. No argument here, it's new!
5. Any press is good press, but this is only partially hype and partially serious issues with how the tournament will be run
6. This is a weird thing to have on this list.
7. Yeah some people are because they want to maintain a fairly large base of players who can support themselves.


Response to your 7. If there are too many pro-players it's diluting the gains of other players. If there are too few then the viewers are lacking diversity of play, i get that. So what is the right number? IDK, do you? A lot of poorly paid players or a few best that gets all the money? I vote for the ladder because I don't have 165hours per week to watch all the games.

The scene has already cracked down on their overpopulation. There are still improvements to see, but this tournament does the opposite of improve upon this.

You don't have 165 hours per week to watch, but you some people are free to watch on Mondays, others on Thursdays, and others on Sundays etc. you're not the only one in the world.
Also, not every tournament has everyone's favorite players. Seeing your favorite play with the best is important to a lot if people, but if your favorite player has to retire because of shitty decisions like this, you'll be a sad panda.
Suteki Da Ne 素敵だね Isn't it Wonderful
ElBlanco
Profile Joined July 2011
Australia140 Posts
January 27 2014 23:24 GMT
#580
I think a lot of the people complaining need to take a step back and look at all the positive things IEM have done for SC2. They have done a shitload for the scene and for SC2 players in general. They have stuck by the game despite it now being pretty minor compared to other games.

Reading people say how they don't care about players is complete bullshit. They still have plenty of prize money to go around outside of this event and ultimately this money still goes to the players. If this helps them build their reputation and that of SC2 who the fuck are we or anyone in the scene to complain? This is a damn good thing for the scene as is the discussion it has generated.

The hate here is totally misplaced.

On January 28 2014 08:02 Shinta) wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2014 07:58 Drmooose wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:51 Nesto wrote:
man, Jaedong is gonna be pissed.


Well if MKP comes back he won't have to worry about Konging it up anymore

On a serious note, I'm pretty excited. It's something new and no one is forcing anyone to play. Good luck to all!!

It's about the money that people won't be making. Not vice versa.

The money is supposed to bring up the hype, but like many people are saying, it might backfire and make the tournament a lot more boring than a normal IEM.


That's not even a remote possibility, that's just the usual people trying to be as negative as possible about anything that happens in the SC2 scene. Have a look how much interest this has generated already even if a fair bit is negative. It has people talking about IEM at a time when really they have been slightly forgotten.

IEM has basically taken a backseat to dreamhack. They are also competing with other esports events and decided to try something different. So far it's working and i have no problem with it.
Prev 1 27 28 29 30 31 51 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 22h 40m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Harstem 450
Rex 119
StarCraft: Brood War
Barracks 8905
Rain 4318
Bisu 1683
Flash 1143
Hyuk 857
BeSt 715
actioN 599
Mini 347
Light 343
Hyun 341
[ Show more ]
Stork 337
EffOrt 260
Soulkey 174
ggaemo 167
Mind 128
ZerO 114
Snow 87
Killer 74
Dewaltoss 71
Sea.KH 64
JYJ55
Movie 51
Rush 50
Yoon 44
Sharp 40
Trikslyr37
sSak 23
soO 23
HiyA 21
sas.Sziky 19
sorry 18
Terrorterran 16
Noble 14
Sacsri 14
Hm[arnc] 13
ivOry 11
Dota 2
Gorgc4377
qojqva2456
420jenkins335
XcaliburYe332
Fuzer 133
Counter-Strike
olofmeister2241
byalli888
SPUNJ749
edward127
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King30
Other Games
gofns17249
tarik_tv12353
singsing2610
B2W.Neo786
DeMusliM459
crisheroes362
Lowko252
oskar132
Happy124
Hui .120
QueenE42
NeuroSwarm39
djWHEAT36
ZerO(Twitch)15
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV47
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 40
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2014
League of Legends
• Nemesis2184
Other Games
• Shiphtur21
Upcoming Events
Maestros of the Game
22h 40m
Serral vs herO
Clem vs Reynor
[BSL 2025] Weekly
1d 4h
[BSL 2025] Weekly
1d 4h
Replay Cast
1d 20h
BSL Team Wars
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Soma vs BeSt
Wardi Open
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Bisu vs Larva
LiuLi Cup
4 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
RSL Revival: Season 2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
Maestros of the Game
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

IPSL Winter 2025-26
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
WardiTV TLMC #15
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.