• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 21:24
CET 03:24
KST 11:24
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
SC2 All-Star Invitational: Tournament Preview5RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jan 12-18): herO, MaxPax, Solar win0BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion6Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets4$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7)16Weekly Cups (Dec 29-Jan 4): Protoss rolls, 2v2 returns7
StarCraft 2
General
When will we find out if there are more tournament PhD study /w SC2 - help with a survey! Weekly Cups (Jan 12-18): herO, MaxPax, Solar win I am looking for StarCraft 2 Beta Patch files Stellar Fest "01" Jersey Charity Auction
Tourneys
$70 Prize Pool Ladder Legends Academy Weekly Open! SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-18 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC2 AI Tournament 2026 $21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7)
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 509 Doomsday Report Mutation # 508 Violent Night Mutation # 507 Well Trained Mutation # 506 Warp Zone
Brood War
General
Gypsy to Korea [ASL21] Potential Map Candidates Video Footage from 2005: The Birth of G2 in Spain BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10 Small VOD Thread 2.0 Azhi's Colosseum - Season 2
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Awesome Games Done Quick 2026!
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread NASA and the Private Sector Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Navigating the Risks and Rew…
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1371 users

IEM World Championship to be Winner Takes All for $100,000…

Forum Index > SC2 General
1003 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 27 28 29 30 31 51 Next
Drmooose
Profile Joined March 2011
United States390 Posts
January 27 2014 22:58 GMT
#561
On January 28 2014 07:51 Nesto wrote:
man, Jaedong is gonna be pissed.


Well if MKP comes back he won't have to worry about Konging it up anymore

On a serious note, I'm pretty excited. It's something new and no one is forcing anyone to play. Good luck to all!!
I have a question...
ManicMarine
Profile Joined April 2011
Australia409 Posts
January 27 2014 23:00 GMT
#562
What an awful tournament format. I hope they back down from this.
Manic by name, Manic by nature.
dyDrawer
Profile Joined September 2012
Canada438 Posts
January 27 2014 23:01 GMT
#563
wow i guess IEM feels like they will have given out enough money by then, so why not throw a YOLO SWAG money for a change, just for the heck of it..

well they better make sure that this happens only once..
Dear, Rain, PartinG, Trap - "Glory to the Firstborn"
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
January 27 2014 23:02 GMT
#564
On January 28 2014 07:58 Drmooose wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2014 07:51 Nesto wrote:
man, Jaedong is gonna be pissed.


Well if MKP comes back he won't have to worry about Konging it up anymore

On a serious note, I'm pretty excited. It's something new and no one is forcing anyone to play. Good luck to all!!


As has been stated before, the season is basically half-way finished. Players already signed up and qualified have been forced into this situation.
Average means I'm better than half of you.
Shinta)
Profile Joined July 2010
United States1716 Posts
January 27 2014 23:02 GMT
#565
On January 28 2014 07:58 Drmooose wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2014 07:51 Nesto wrote:
man, Jaedong is gonna be pissed.


Well if MKP comes back he won't have to worry about Konging it up anymore

On a serious note, I'm pretty excited. It's something new and no one is forcing anyone to play. Good luck to all!!

It's about the money that people won't be making. Not vice versa.

The money is supposed to bring up the hype, but like many people are saying, it might backfire and make the tournament a lot more boring than a normal IEM.
Suteki Da Ne 素敵だね Isn't it Wonderful
IncubusSC
Profile Joined December 2013
Canada57 Posts
January 27 2014 23:04 GMT
#566
On January 28 2014 07:56 Darkhoarse wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2014 07:52 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:43 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:41 IncubusSC wrote:
This uproar just goes to show how phobic to change a large portion of this community is. Something unique gets presented and all these people get scared and nestle up inside their little imaginary safety bubbles.

How about Winner takes nothing, and 2-16 take all.

That's actually a unique idea. If you hate that, clearly you're scared and huddled in your safety bubble.


You sound a little mad. You a little mad?

What an excellent addition to intelligent debate.


As opposed to a bunch of NON-competitors whining about one single tournament being different than every other one.
"Growing old is natural, growing up is optional."
Darkhorse
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
United States23455 Posts
January 27 2014 23:05 GMT
#567
On January 28 2014 08:04 IncubusSC wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2014 07:56 Darkhoarse wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:52 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:43 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:41 IncubusSC wrote:
This uproar just goes to show how phobic to change a large portion of this community is. Something unique gets presented and all these people get scared and nestle up inside their little imaginary safety bubbles.

How about Winner takes nothing, and 2-16 take all.

That's actually a unique idea. If you hate that, clearly you're scared and huddled in your safety bubble.


You sound a little mad. You a little mad?

What an excellent addition to intelligent debate.


As opposed to a bunch of NON-competitors whining about one single tournament being different than every other one.

At least they expressed some reasoning as to why they thought it was bad rather than going with, "You a little mad?"
WriterRecently Necro'd (?)
Mifoi123
Profile Joined May 2013
Canada42 Posts
January 27 2014 23:05 GMT
#568
On January 28 2014 07:55 Darkhoarse wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2014 07:50 Mifoi123 wrote:
1. The secure source of income for sc2 players is: WCS AM, WCS EU and GSL. Check!
2. IEM creates a new tournament with the best 16 players for the fans to watch. Check!
3. IEM injects $100K in the sc2 scene. Check!
4. IEM tries something new. Check!
5. Everyone is talking about it and that is creating HYPE. Check!
6. Carmac is a genius imo! Check!
7. SC2 fans are unhappy? Wait what? I am HYPED! :D

Note: Look at it differently... If this tournament does not happen then nobody would mention the fact that those 16 players get nothing. Now 1 of those 16 players will get $100K, how cool is that! :D

1. this source of income is really just okay, not all that secure.
2. This tournament has existed for a few years. Also, they might not end up with "the best 16 players for the fans to watch"
3. once again, this 100k prize pool tournament has already existed
4. No argument here, it's new!
5. Any press is good press, but this is only partially hype and partially serious issues with how the tournament will be run
6. This is a weird thing to have on this list.
7. Yeah some people are because they want to maintain a fairly large base of players who can support themselves.


Response to your 7. If there are too many pro-players it's diluting the gains of other players. If there are too few then the viewers are lacking diversity of play, i get that. So what is the right number? IDK, do you? A lot of poorly paid players or a few best that gets all the money? I vote for the ladder because I don't have 165hours per week to watch all the games.
I'd like to help! :)
Darkhorse
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
United States23455 Posts
January 27 2014 23:08 GMT
#569
On January 28 2014 08:05 Mifoi123 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2014 07:55 Darkhoarse wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:50 Mifoi123 wrote:
1. The secure source of income for sc2 players is: WCS AM, WCS EU and GSL. Check!
2. IEM creates a new tournament with the best 16 players for the fans to watch. Check!
3. IEM injects $100K in the sc2 scene. Check!
4. IEM tries something new. Check!
5. Everyone is talking about it and that is creating HYPE. Check!
6. Carmac is a genius imo! Check!
7. SC2 fans are unhappy? Wait what? I am HYPED! :D

Note: Look at it differently... If this tournament does not happen then nobody would mention the fact that those 16 players get nothing. Now 1 of those 16 players will get $100K, how cool is that! :D

1. this source of income is really just okay, not all that secure.
2. This tournament has existed for a few years. Also, they might not end up with "the best 16 players for the fans to watch"
3. once again, this 100k prize pool tournament has already existed
4. No argument here, it's new!
5. Any press is good press, but this is only partially hype and partially serious issues with how the tournament will be run
6. This is a weird thing to have on this list.
7. Yeah some people are because they want to maintain a fairly large base of players who can support themselves.


Response to your 7. If there are too many pro-players it's diluting the gains of other players. If there are too few then the viewers are lacking diversity of play, i get that. So what is the right number? IDK, do you? A lot of poorly paid players or a few best that gets all the money? I vote for the ladder because I don't have 165hours per week to watch all the games.

I don't know the right number of players, but I'd sure love for the Korea scene to be able to support teamleagues and have full GSL's of 32 in Code S and 48 in Code A.
WriterRecently Necro'd (?)
IncubusSC
Profile Joined December 2013
Canada57 Posts
January 27 2014 23:08 GMT
#570
On January 28 2014 08:05 Darkhoarse wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2014 08:04 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:56 Darkhoarse wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:52 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:43 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:41 IncubusSC wrote:
This uproar just goes to show how phobic to change a large portion of this community is. Something unique gets presented and all these people get scared and nestle up inside their little imaginary safety bubbles.

How about Winner takes nothing, and 2-16 take all.

That's actually a unique idea. If you hate that, clearly you're scared and huddled in your safety bubble.


You sound a little mad. You a little mad?

What an excellent addition to intelligent debate.


As opposed to a bunch of NON-competitors whining about one single tournament being different than every other one.

At least they expressed some reasoning as to why they thought it was bad rather than going with, "You a little mad?"


I don't see the need to put in any concerted effort into arguing with kids over the internet about a video game haha.
"Growing old is natural, growing up is optional."
SamuraiX-
Profile Joined January 2013
United States52 Posts
January 27 2014 23:10 GMT
#571
On January 28 2014 07:46 Paragleiber wrote:

Of course some people are already qualified.

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/IEM_Season_VIII_-_World_Championship


That Prize Pool section of the page is both hilarious and depressing all at the same time. lol
Bomber | Mvp | MMA – Life | Jaedong | Soulkey – Rain | Creator | Seed
AlternativeEgo
Profile Joined August 2011
Sweden17309 Posts
January 27 2014 23:10 GMT
#572
I love it. I love everything about it. No, the players are not victims for getting this opportunity. No, I don't think that there will be competitors who will not try their hardest to take the number one spot, raise that trophy and have his name written in the history book as the guy who won the Winner Only $100.000 Tournament (money-splitting does not change that). The coolest motherfucker is about to get crowned. I'll watch that shit.

And my favourite Maltese gets things right:

On January 28 2014 05:23 mikkmagro wrote:
People forget that ESL was for a long time a big advocate for not having a top heavy prizepool for their regular circuit events. It is still that way for all their global championships, just not for the World Championship, which is one event.

As for helping progamers make money, ESL is the organiser with the largest span of countries in which they organise events in as many continents and for as many scenes as possible. Singapore, Brazil, Ukraine...they go EVERYWHERE, and they always invite the 'local champion' directly into the tournament to give people a hometown favourite. They provide qualifiers for all the regions, including Taiwan, Oceania, etc to make sure everyone has a shot.

Apart from that, they organise hundreds of smaller regional and local tournaments such as the ESL Euro Series, the EPS in Germany and Spain, weekly and monthly cups etc.

So really, they deserve no criticism at all from that front. They're just doing one event differently.

Mark Munoz looks like Gretorp
Darkhorse
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
United States23455 Posts
January 27 2014 23:11 GMT
#573
On January 28 2014 08:08 IncubusSC wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2014 08:05 Darkhoarse wrote:
On January 28 2014 08:04 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:56 Darkhoarse wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:52 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:43 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:41 IncubusSC wrote:
This uproar just goes to show how phobic to change a large portion of this community is. Something unique gets presented and all these people get scared and nestle up inside their little imaginary safety bubbles.

How about Winner takes nothing, and 2-16 take all.

That's actually a unique idea. If you hate that, clearly you're scared and huddled in your safety bubble.


You sound a little mad. You a little mad?

What an excellent addition to intelligent debate.


As opposed to a bunch of NON-competitors whining about one single tournament being different than every other one.

At least they expressed some reasoning as to why they thought it was bad rather than going with, "You a little mad?"


I don't see the need to put in any concerted effort into arguing with kids over the internet about a video game haha.

If you actually felt that way you wouldn't have started doing it. And you certainly wouldn't still be doing it right now.
WriterRecently Necro'd (?)
MtlGuitarist97
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
United States1539 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-01-27 23:12:37
January 27 2014 23:12 GMT
#574
I will probably end up watching this tourney, but there's a lot of stupid stuff with it. No Terrans so far (probably gonna invite 2 Terrans if I had to guess), huge prize pool that goes to one person, tiny player pool, single elimination, etc.

Pretty cool initiative from ESL, but I wish that they had chosen a slightly different format. Maybe more like a Red Bull BG format where the prize money was more evenly distributed where even the lowest players got decent money. I understand the winner takes all "world champion" mentality, but I don't think you can do that in a game like SC2.
IncubusSC
Profile Joined December 2013
Canada57 Posts
January 27 2014 23:14 GMT
#575
On January 28 2014 08:11 Darkhoarse wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2014 08:08 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 08:05 Darkhoarse wrote:
On January 28 2014 08:04 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:56 Darkhoarse wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:52 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:43 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:41 IncubusSC wrote:
This uproar just goes to show how phobic to change a large portion of this community is. Something unique gets presented and all these people get scared and nestle up inside their little imaginary safety bubbles.

How about Winner takes nothing, and 2-16 take all.

That's actually a unique idea. If you hate that, clearly you're scared and huddled in your safety bubble.


You sound a little mad. You a little mad?

What an excellent addition to intelligent debate.


As opposed to a bunch of NON-competitors whining about one single tournament being different than every other one.

At least they expressed some reasoning as to why they thought it was bad rather than going with, "You a little mad?"


I don't see the need to put in any concerted effort into arguing with kids over the internet about a video game haha.

If you actually felt that way you wouldn't have started doing it. And you certainly wouldn't still be doing it right now.


Yeah, because the message I've sent so far have been such a strain on my energy lol.
"Growing old is natural, growing up is optional."
Darkhorse
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
United States23455 Posts
January 27 2014 23:16 GMT
#576
On January 28 2014 08:14 IncubusSC wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2014 08:11 Darkhoarse wrote:
On January 28 2014 08:08 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 08:05 Darkhoarse wrote:
On January 28 2014 08:04 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:56 Darkhoarse wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:52 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:43 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:41 IncubusSC wrote:
This uproar just goes to show how phobic to change a large portion of this community is. Something unique gets presented and all these people get scared and nestle up inside their little imaginary safety bubbles.

How about Winner takes nothing, and 2-16 take all.

That's actually a unique idea. If you hate that, clearly you're scared and huddled in your safety bubble.


You sound a little mad. You a little mad?

What an excellent addition to intelligent debate.


As opposed to a bunch of NON-competitors whining about one single tournament being different than every other one.

At least they expressed some reasoning as to why they thought it was bad rather than going with, "You a little mad?"


I don't see the need to put in any concerted effort into arguing with kids over the internet about a video game haha.

If you actually felt that way you wouldn't have started doing it. And you certainly wouldn't still be doing it right now.


Yeah, because the message I've sent so far have been such a strain on my energy lol.

Haha whatever man. But you are sitting in front of your computer refreshing the page to see my replies and respond to them, so you can go ahead and drop the "I'm too cool for this shit" act. Or don't totally your call.
WriterRecently Necro'd (?)
Larkin
Profile Blog Joined January 2012
United Kingdom7161 Posts
January 27 2014 23:19 GMT
#577
Wow this is ridiculous. I get why they're doing it but really the reasons for why they are aren't as valid as the reasons for why they shouldn't.

100k as well... that's equal to the single highest prize in SC2, the WCS Globals. 50k I could kinda get behind but... still.
https://www.twitch.tv/ttalarkin - streams random stuff, high level teamleague, maybe even heroleague
Epamynondas
Profile Joined September 2012
387 Posts
January 27 2014 23:19 GMT
#578
On January 28 2014 08:14 IncubusSC wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2014 08:11 Darkhoarse wrote:
On January 28 2014 08:08 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 08:05 Darkhoarse wrote:
On January 28 2014 08:04 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:56 Darkhoarse wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:52 IncubusSC wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:43 WolfintheSheep wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:41 IncubusSC wrote:
This uproar just goes to show how phobic to change a large portion of this community is. Something unique gets presented and all these people get scared and nestle up inside their little imaginary safety bubbles.

How about Winner takes nothing, and 2-16 take all.

That's actually a unique idea. If you hate that, clearly you're scared and huddled in your safety bubble.


You sound a little mad. You a little mad?

What an excellent addition to intelligent debate.


As opposed to a bunch of NON-competitors whining about one single tournament being different than every other one.

At least they expressed some reasoning as to why they thought it was bad rather than going with, "You a little mad?"


I don't see the need to put in any concerted effort into arguing with kids over the internet about a video game haha.

If you actually felt that way you wouldn't have started doing it. And you certainly wouldn't still be doing it right now.


Yeah, because the message I've sent so far have been such a strain on my energy lol.

Growing old is natural. Growing up is optional.
Shinta)
Profile Joined July 2010
United States1716 Posts
January 27 2014 23:22 GMT
#579
On January 28 2014 08:05 Mifoi123 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2014 07:55 Darkhoarse wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:50 Mifoi123 wrote:
1. The secure source of income for sc2 players is: WCS AM, WCS EU and GSL. Check!
2. IEM creates a new tournament with the best 16 players for the fans to watch. Check!
3. IEM injects $100K in the sc2 scene. Check!
4. IEM tries something new. Check!
5. Everyone is talking about it and that is creating HYPE. Check!
6. Carmac is a genius imo! Check!
7. SC2 fans are unhappy? Wait what? I am HYPED! :D

Note: Look at it differently... If this tournament does not happen then nobody would mention the fact that those 16 players get nothing. Now 1 of those 16 players will get $100K, how cool is that! :D

1. this source of income is really just okay, not all that secure.
2. This tournament has existed for a few years. Also, they might not end up with "the best 16 players for the fans to watch"
3. once again, this 100k prize pool tournament has already existed
4. No argument here, it's new!
5. Any press is good press, but this is only partially hype and partially serious issues with how the tournament will be run
6. This is a weird thing to have on this list.
7. Yeah some people are because they want to maintain a fairly large base of players who can support themselves.


Response to your 7. If there are too many pro-players it's diluting the gains of other players. If there are too few then the viewers are lacking diversity of play, i get that. So what is the right number? IDK, do you? A lot of poorly paid players or a few best that gets all the money? I vote for the ladder because I don't have 165hours per week to watch all the games.

The scene has already cracked down on their overpopulation. There are still improvements to see, but this tournament does the opposite of improve upon this.

You don't have 165 hours per week to watch, but you some people are free to watch on Mondays, others on Thursdays, and others on Sundays etc. you're not the only one in the world.
Also, not every tournament has everyone's favorite players. Seeing your favorite play with the best is important to a lot if people, but if your favorite player has to retire because of shitty decisions like this, you'll be a sad panda.
Suteki Da Ne 素敵だね Isn't it Wonderful
ElBlanco
Profile Joined July 2011
Australia140 Posts
January 27 2014 23:24 GMT
#580
I think a lot of the people complaining need to take a step back and look at all the positive things IEM have done for SC2. They have done a shitload for the scene and for SC2 players in general. They have stuck by the game despite it now being pretty minor compared to other games.

Reading people say how they don't care about players is complete bullshit. They still have plenty of prize money to go around outside of this event and ultimately this money still goes to the players. If this helps them build their reputation and that of SC2 who the fuck are we or anyone in the scene to complain? This is a damn good thing for the scene as is the discussion it has generated.

The hate here is totally misplaced.

On January 28 2014 08:02 Shinta) wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2014 07:58 Drmooose wrote:
On January 28 2014 07:51 Nesto wrote:
man, Jaedong is gonna be pissed.


Well if MKP comes back he won't have to worry about Konging it up anymore

On a serious note, I'm pretty excited. It's something new and no one is forcing anyone to play. Good luck to all!!

It's about the money that people won't be making. Not vice versa.

The money is supposed to bring up the hype, but like many people are saying, it might backfire and make the tournament a lot more boring than a normal IEM.


That's not even a remote possibility, that's just the usual people trying to be as negative as possible about anything that happens in the SC2 scene. Have a look how much interest this has generated already even if a fair bit is negative. It has people talking about IEM at a time when really they have been slightly forgotten.

IEM has basically taken a backseat to dreamhack. They are also competing with other esports events and decided to try something different. So far it's working and i have no problem with it.
Prev 1 27 28 29 30 31 51 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 8h 36m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft535
Nathanias 82
StarCraft: Brood War
GuemChi 1139
Sharp 246
Shuttle 104
HiyA 79
Stormgate
Artosis903
Dota 2
monkeys_forever223
febbydoto19
NeuroSwarm18
League of Legends
C9.Mang0533
Counter-Strike
fl0m1399
Coldzera 552
taco 337
m0e_tv237
Foxcn177
Other Games
summit1g6027
JimRising 513
XaKoH 318
Day[9].tv250
Maynarde157
minikerr25
ZombieGrub24
Liquid`Ken4
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 94
• HeavenSC 31
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• Kozan
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Laughngamez YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
• Mapu5
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota21243
League of Legends
• Scarra1776
Other Games
• Day9tv250
Upcoming Events
OSC
8h 36m
Shameless vs MaNa
Nicoract vs Percival
Krystianer vs TBD
Cure vs SHIN
PiGosaur Monday
22h 36m
The PondCast
1d 7h
OSC
1d 8h
Big Brain Bouts
3 days
Serral vs TBD
BSL 21
4 days
BSL 21
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
Monday Night Weeklies
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

IPSL Winter 2025-26
SC2 All-Star Inv. 2025
NA Kuram Kup

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
OSC Championship Season 13
Underdog Cup #3
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W5
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Rongyi Cup S3
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.