• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 11:40
CET 17:40
KST 01:40
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
The Road to Katowice - 2022/23 Retrospective21Disasterpiece Theater: Soulkey vs sOs (2013-05-21)11WTL 2022 Winter - Regular Season Awards + Wrap-up24WTL Winter - The 2v2 Tour25WTL 2022 Winter - Regular Season Finale7
Community News
Rex leaves ONSYDE, Ryung joins4[BSL16] - RO16 Group Stage11ESL Open Cup #159: herO, Spirit, Dark win5WardiTV 2023 Opens (Monthly)1IEM Katowice 2023 - Hosts & Commentators34
StarCraft 2
General
5.0.11 Patch Released - Balance Changes Interview with RuFF at Dreamhack Atlanta 2022 IEM Katowice 2023 - Hosts & Commentators Serral leaves ENCE, joins Basilisk Rex leaves ONSYDE, Ryung joins
Tourneys
NorCal StarFest I [Alpha Pro Series] MaxPax vs ByuN WardiTV 2023 Opens (Monthly) $5000 #PassionCraft Knockout TournyCraft free tourny management web app
Strategy
Custom Maps
[A] (Minigames) Raynor Party [A] [TPS RPG] Transformers: Open World (WIP) Work In Progress Melee Maps
External Content
Mutation # 354 Media Blackout Mutation # 353 Hostile Territory Mutation # 352 Railroad Switch Mutation # 351 Assembly of Vengeance
Brood War
General
Custom Campaign Upload UMS maps by GrizzleSyndrome BW General Discussion SC Gathering 2023 Stockholm 13-14th may! BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues New Worlds Map Contest III: All Submissions (VOTE HERE) [BSL16] - RO16 Group A - Saturday 18:00 CET Sanpao StarLeague Spring Cup S4 : Korea
Strategy
Marine rate of fire Simple Questions, Simple Answers Valkyrie dmg formula? 2v2 Spell Combos
Other Games
General Games
Fire Emblem Destiny 2 - PC/Xbox/PS4 Frost Giant announce Stormgate World of Warcraft Classic Path of Exile
Dota 2
[DPC 23] Tour 1 Discussion Official Dota and Chess General Discussion
League of Legends
[Spring 2023] LoL E-sports General Discussion LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net [Patch Notes] Release General Discussion
Heroes of the Storm
HotS: WP and Funny Moments
Hearthstone
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Plays: Diplomacy TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Coronavirus and You YouTube Thread UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The Flash Fan Club The GoOdy Fan Club The TY Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [TV] HBO The Last Of Us series Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2022 - 2023 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2022 2021 NFL/CFB Season NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
FIFA World Cup 2022 - Knockout Stage FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022 Thread
Tech Support
Left control suddenly mutes volume Red text blurry and funky blue on black text Which Gaming Laptop Should I Buy?
TL Community
Ask TL Staff Anything Happy Birthday R1CH! Is there a SQSA thread for this site?
Blogs
Hosting/casting tournies for t…
Trozz
It's that time of year YET A…
Umpteen
I'm still around doodling and…
Glider
Someone Crashed my Plane …
micronesia
A spiritual journey th…
mewithoutDrew
The Kitty Arcade Saga
MrBitter
My Goals for 2023
DeNikSSB
State of StarCraft II
Jealous
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1298 users

Interview w/ David Kim on Balance at IEM Shanghai

Forum Index > SC2 General
110 CommentsPost a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
digmouse
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
China6029 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-08-24 10:04:48
August 24 2013 05:07 GMT
#1
Back at end of July, at ChinaJoy and IEM Shanghai, I was able to sit down with David Kim, Senior Balance Designer of the Starcraft II development team, for half an hour. With him I discussed various aspects of the game including balance and features that Heart of the Swarm brought to the game.

[image loading]

Reminder: This interview was conducted before 2.0.10 patch, the recent ladder map pool changes and balance test maps, because of scheduling and other work/real-life commitments I was just able to fully transcript it yesterday, Some information might not reflect the current situation or metagame.

Thanks monk and the TL Strategy team for providing several questions and help formatting this thread!

What's your feeling about the overall balance after the recent Terran changes? Are there any other aspects of the game the team is currently monitoring?

DK: I think it's slightly safe to say the changes are good; initially I think it's decent. The main thing we wanted to address in the Hellbat change was to reduce Hellbat drops in TvT, mostly because while we like to have more harassment options in the game, we don't want to have harassment options like Hellbat drops that are a little too easy to execute. So for example if you see Marine drops executed by the highest level of Terran players versus a average level pro player, you can clearly see the difference, while Hellbat drops doesn't look like that because it's really easy to execute. That's why we want to see less of it. TvT has become a lot better since the change. As for the Banshee we are sort of hoping to see a bit more of Banshee play in HotS since we almost stop seeing it altogether. The reason why we want to see more of it is because of the same reason: Banshee micro is really awesome to watch and I think a lot of Terran fans and viewers will agree so we want to bring that back. Initially, players are trying new builds, so we want to keep a close watch on what they are doing. On top of that we don't really have specific changes we are trying to do any time in the near future. But our general stance is that we want to make sure if there is a race that is over-performing or under-performing, we can quickly identify the problem and deal with the problem in a way that makes the game a lot of fun to watch. So for example say Protoss is a bit weak right now, if that's the case then we want to buff units like the Oracle, or other units that promote you to have more skirmishes through out the game.

We currently have two different map pools for WCS, one for WCS AM and EU and one for KR, what's the reason behind this?

DK: So what we have now is a bit complex: in American and Europe we are using 7 of 9 ladder maps, so we have 9 ladder maps on the pool. Korea is a exception, we tried to include the two maps this season as well, but because of timing issues and we need to fix a lot of bugs on the map, stuff like that, so we couldn't make it into the pool. For Season 3 we are currently working with all the partners to make sure and check if it's viable to have a complete alignment of all the maps on ladder and the three regions. So the current plan is try to work out a list of 7 maps so some maps will include TLMC winners and some maps will include the new GSL maps they are creating right now. Ultimately, the goal is try to have a completely aligned map pool between the regions next season.

Can we expect more changes to the team ladder maps? Players have been asking for it since forever.

DK: We are definitely aware of that feedback. We are planning to include two new team play maps every new season. Next season we're working on a couple of new 2v2 maps, so the season after that we might move on to new 3v3 maps and so on. Every new season we will try to include some new team maps as well as 1v1 maps. But with that said, I don't know how feasible that is because our season is quite short now but we will try our best to make sure to rotate out map pool of every single bracket, not just 1v1.

Will the new team maps come from TLMC #2?

DK: Yeah sure some of them will be coming from TLMC as well as Blizzard maps, but right now I think the only maps that will come to the map pool from the contest are 1v1 maps, but the season after that you can definitely expect some team maps to enter the rotation as well.

In custom games we don't have the game list feature from BW and War3. Can we actually expect a return of that? Not to replace the custom games system we have now, just an alternative.

DK: So we have the open game list feature for both custom games and arcade. Compare to say, Warcraft III, the current open game system will eventually have all games filled and much faster, but you can't make your own customized names in open games. I think this is an area we are definitely looking at, as the ways to improve not only to the open game system but also the custom game experience in general. We don't have anything final right now but we definitely are talking about improvements.

Despite the HotS changes to promote more harassment and multiple engagements, Protoss is still the race that encourages deathball play, especially in PvZ. While the warp prism buff is a step in the right direction, is Blizzard considering any other options to change this often-complained about aspect of Protoss?

DK: Not just Protoss in specific, just across the board every single race should have more harassment options, the more skirmishes there are in a given matchup, I think the better. And the reason is because like back in WoL right before HotS came out, if you take any matchup for example PvT, we saw many very similar games because Protoss players are defending drops so well that both players just macro up and don't fight for like 15 minutes and the game ends in 2 or 3 big engagements, if you watch 10 PvT games even on different maps, you see exact same games over and over again. We don't think that's a good thing, across the board we try to do our best to make sure we have more skirmishes. For Protoss specifically we currently don't have plans to change anything right now, but if Protoss or any race appear to be a little weak, the way we want to buff those races is by adding more options to be more on the aggressive.

Oracles were added to encourage harassment and aggressive plays but still it's a do game-ending damage or nothing at all unit. Though professional players are beginning to employ Revelation more usefully, they still seem somewhat as a dead weight unit if they don't do significant damage in the early game. Compare this to the widow mine, which can act as an early game harass unit, but maintains its usefulness throughout the game. All in all, the concept seems to reinforce the idea that Protoss has either only gimmicky or deathball units. Is this a major concern both for this specific unit and for the overall design of Protoss?

DK: So I think the Oracle right now is the Go-For-It unit if it isn't there already. It's a unit we want to see throughout the whole game, every time you go in with it to harass a worker line, maybe you don't get 20 or 30 worker kills like we saw in the beginning of HotS, the defenses has got a lot of better for all races, you don't see huge Oracle wins but at the same time, we want the unit to utilize its movement speed, just stay as a threat throughout the course of a game. A few months ago we tried a movement speed and acceleration buff for the Oracle, I think that was a good test to see if the Oracle is really difficult to kill. If we have a unit that stays in the game for a long time, just doing small things like scouting, using Revelation to check the army composition but not doing crazy significant game ending damage, then we can create a lot more small skirmishes so that each game is more exciting to watch since there is a lot more action throughout the game.

The Stephano style Swarm host based compositions in ZvP are beginning to feel like infestor broodlord compositions in WoL. The Zerg would often hunker up on 4-5 bases with free units and starve out the Protoss in a split map situation. How big of an issue does the development team see this as?

DK: It's definitely the problem if that's the main way to use Swarm Hosts, right now we seeing two different ways to use Swarm Hosts, one is what you mention, the super boring mass spine, you defend and slowly push using Swarm Hosts. The other I think it's more fun to watch, the Zerg uses Swarm Hosts to send locusts then unborrow them right away, move them to a different location, constantly play this hide and seek game. Depending how it works out, if it becomes the case that the Stephano style is the most useful way to use Swarm Hosts, we will take measures to fix that problem. Right now we are in the process of still evaluating which one is the most prominent and effective way to use Swarm Hosts, but we do agree that stale and boring strategies are not good for the game, our two main reasons to patch HotS right now would be: first, if a unit is too overpowered, second is like you say a unit or strategy is causing the game boring to watch.

In WoL, Protoss could react to mutalisks with either blink/templar or phoenixes. But with the mutalisks and phoenix buffs in HotS, only phoenixes are now viable as a counter, causing PvZ to become very centralized around stargate play. It also complete got rid of the storm vs mutalisk dynamic we commonly found in WoL, which seems counter-intuitive since a stated goal of the design team was to encourage different styles to be viable. Was this focus on phoenix/stargate play the intention of the design team and what do you think about this new mutalisk dynamic in PvZ?

DK: In WoL we really only have the Robo tech and the Templar tech viable. The Stargate was just for making a small number of Phoenixes or Void Rays early on and then you completely forget about it. So in HotS we wanted to make the Stargate as powerful as Robo tech or Templar tech. In this specific case, I agree only the Phoenixes is the best counter to Mutas, but I think you can still defend with Blink Stalkers until you get your counters out. We don't believe when you fight against this specific strategy every tech tree must be viable. We want every single tech tree to be viable in specific scenarios. Against Mutas, Stargate will be the strongest but if someone is going mass Hydras to counter that, going Robo or going Storm will be a lot better. I think as a whole we are at a pretty good space, what's interesting is we buff the tech tree that was never being utilized in WoL, because of that a lot of people feel like this tech path is a lot more OP than it actually is. Say for example if no one uses Robo, no one uses Colossi in WoL, we buff them to be what they are now, a lot of people will be complaining that Colossi are overpowered, when in fact that's not the case right now. So I think it's important to see the big picture and see how viable each tech tree is in that sense I think we are quite successful not only with the Phoenix changes but also with the Void Ray changes as well.

During the Beta I had a interview with Dustin Brower, and he stated that making mech more viable was an important focus of the design process. How successful do you think you were with this goal? How have your goals changes since then?

DK: So I don't think we completely hit that goal but for example in TvT mech is definitely viable, we see a lot bio vs mech and mech vs mech games already. In the other two matchups it's not as viable as bio but I think if we have to choose, mech being viable in TvT is the most exciting because it makes the mirror match-up a lot more diverse than players go to Marine-Tank all the time. As far as we try to explore how to make mech better, we have to be more careful because the balance of the three races are pretty good right now, each match-up is quite fun to watch right now even including ZvZ and PvP. We don't want to make drastic changes just to switch up the current metagame. Like I said before, I think our two main focuses for when we patch HotS is if there is problem with a unit like it's too overpowered or if a strategy is boring to watch. But if you look at bio play, especially in TvZ, it's very exciting. There are so many skirmishes and sometimes you even have game where players fighting over a location for like 20 minutes. So since the game is exciting to watch, I think it's dangerous to touch other strategy or units.

The recent nerfs to hellbat, with the stated goal of nerfing hellbat drops, had the unfortunate side effect of nerfing hellbat-bio compositions in TvP. While the blue flame upgrade is easily accessible in mech compositions, a factor with an attached tech lab is hard to come by in bio-based compositions. This is reminiscent of the snipe nerf to ghosts, which while were intended as a nerf in TvP, caused the unfortunate side effect of nerfing snipes vs zealots and ghost openings in TvT. How heavily did Blizzard consider this side-effect when choosing this particular hellbat nerf?

DK: Sniping on Zealots isn't that amazing even before the Snipe nerfs (blame monk for asking that lol). But that aside, for the Hellbat it's all about player hasn't been used to play that way yet, I think the perfect example is in TvZ: the most popular style is to play Bio-mine, and Terran players don't have problem going Reactor Widow Mines while getting Drilling Claws upgrade, so kinda similar to that, I think when players figure out the best timing to get the blue flame upgrade for the Hellbats, I think Hellbats can still be utilized as before because they are still very powerful units. Their stats hasn't been nerfed and they still dominate mass Zealots and so on. It's just a matter of timing and learning the best time to get the best upgrade and work that into your build order. eventually you'll get Hellbats back to your late game composition.

With all of the effort to make mech TvX a viable strategy in all match-ups, can you explain why the siege tank has been left relatively untouched besides free siege upgrade?

DK: I think that was a huge change because it allows Terran to play a lot diverse openers because the defense is a lot stronger. On Tanks in general we receive a lot of feedback that Tanks needs a buff, most specifically have more damage and lower rate of fire. Doing that we don't think it will do that much in like PvT, because the counters to Siege Tanks are Chargelots and Immortals. If you increase the damage a bit, it won't change much because Immortals and Zealots have a really harsh counter relationship with Tanks; you might be able to kill a bit more of them, but I don't think it will change too much. Our worry is that Tanks are good units in TvT, so what that buff will mean in that matchup? So I think it's difficult to touch units that are useful otherwise in other matchups. And as I said, our goal is not making every unit be as powerful as, say the Widow Mine or Void Ray. The goal for us is to create exciting games to watch and as long as strategies are good, as long as every matchup is diverse, I don't think it's a specific problem to specific units like Siege Tanks. But at the same time, if the metagame evolves into certain spaces that games are boring and dull, then I think Siege Tanks is a good area to improve on.

Are there any plans to try to further integrate creative content from outside sources other than Blizzard, directly into the client? Is this something you've looked at with the beta desktop client?

DK: Recently we released the WCS Portal. It's a place to check standings, schedules, and stuff like that. But like you said, there could be improvement like the in-game client, but for now our focuses is getting WCS right, getting the portal as best as possible, and then after that looking at other resources as well. For the desktop client, I have no idea actually haha. We are still in beta, so it's really hard to say but we wouldn't rule anything out in the future.

In Valve's Dota 2, they instantiated a system that places reported individuals in a low priority pool as a sort of penance for their maligned actions. Can you comment on what you think the value of this kind of system is in deterring what would be flagged as unwanted behavior? Would a similar system have value in SC2's environment?

DK: I don't know if the reporting system is the best for Starcraft II, but we do believe that improvement can be made for average players' playing experience, especially in team games. It's a thing we are looking into right now, and in the future hopefully we'll have something that really fits our game and make improvement to Battle.net that way.

Previous Blizzard titles have in the past had a simple but very effective hotkey setup to help with semi mouse-less navigation within their respective clients (battle.net). As your player base gets more and more accustomed to the Battle.net UI, do you have plans to further add to this existing functionality beyond what's already been implemented (such as adding [Tab] or [Enter] into the design)?

DK: We currently are more focusing on features rather than polishing issues like that. Because our focus is heavily on creating so many different features like training mode, matchmaking vs AI, leveling system and watch replay with others. The polish part is a bit neglected I guess. I think going forward if all these systems turn out to be pretty good, then the next step can be looking at how to make our systems easier to navigate.

Before we end, can you say something to our Chinese players?

DK: I think Chinese players are doing good in WCS right now, in particular I'm cheering for Jim and MacSed, I really hope one of them wins the whole thing! Hope you guys not only play the game, but also watch esports and cheer for your favorite Starcraft II players.
Facebook Twitter Reddit
TranslatorIf you want to ask anything about Chinese esports, send me a PM or follow me @nerddigmouse.
AndAgain
Profile Joined November 2010
United States2621 Posts
August 24 2013 05:20 GMT
#2
+ Show Spoiler +
Despite the HotS changes to promote more harassment and multiple engagements, Protoss is still the race that encourages deathball play, especially in PvZ. While the warp prism buff is a step in the right direction, is Blizzard considering any other options to change this often-complained about aspect of Protoss?

DK: Not just Protoss in specific, just across the board every single race should have more harassment options, the more skirmishes there are in a given matchup, I think the better. And the reason is because like back in WoL right before HotS came out, if you take any matchup for example PvT, we saw many very similar games because Protoss players are defending drops so well that both players just macro up and don't fight for like 15 minutes and the game ends in 2 or 3 big engagements, if you watch 10 PvT games even on different maps, you see exact same games over and over again. We don't think that's a good thing, across the board we try to do our best to make sure we have more skirmishes. For Protoss specifically we currently don't have plans to change anything right now, but if Protoss or any race appear to be a little weak, the way we want to buff those races is by adding more options to be more on the aggressive.


May be some day they'll realize that the way to get more skirmishes is to reward more expanding and spreading yourself out as prescribed in the thread "Breadth of Gameplay in SC2." Tinkering with unit stats is not gonna cut it.
All your teeth should fall out and hair should grow in their place!
larse
Profile Blog Joined March 2012
1611 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-08-24 05:34:20
August 24 2013 05:33 GMT
#3
The Chinese article has been translated before:

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=422804

Nevertheless thanks for the full translation.

User was warned for this post
digmouse
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
China6029 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-08-24 05:53:20
August 24 2013 05:42 GMT
#4
On August 24 2013 14:33 larse wrote:
The Chinese article has been translated before:

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=422804

Nevertheless thanks for the full translation.

It's not a translation, I interviewed him myself one on one and transcript the recording, it's not that press conference and talk party.
TranslatorIf you want to ask anything about Chinese esports, send me a PM or follow me @nerddigmouse.
ysnake
Profile Joined June 2012
Bosnia-Herzegovina261 Posts
August 24 2013 05:47 GMT
#5
No mention of Zergs
You are no longer automatically breathing and blinking.
avilo
Profile Blog Joined November 2007
United States4100 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-08-24 05:59:04
August 24 2013 05:53 GMT
#6
Good interview and good questions. Their answers about mech are quite infuriating to read. Especially this part:

"If you increase the damage a bit, it won't change much because Immortals and Zealots have a really harsh counter relationship with Tanks..."

So they recognize no matter what they change with Terran mech...the main issue is the immortal being an extreme hard counter to mech/tanks TvP..soooo...how about they do something about it

Whoever the interviewer was, props to you for actually knowing your shiot about the game and asking amazing questions.
edit:
On August 24 2013 14:42 digmouse wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 24 2013 14:33 larse wrote:
The Chinese article has been translated before:

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=422804

Nevertheless thanks for the full translation.

It's not a translation, I interviewed him myself one on one and transcript the recording, it's not that press conference and talk party.


aha, good stuff
Sup
larse
Profile Blog Joined March 2012
1611 Posts
August 24 2013 05:56 GMT
#7
On August 24 2013 14:42 digmouse wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 24 2013 14:33 larse wrote:
The Chinese article has been translated before:

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=422804

Nevertheless thanks for the full translation.

It's not a translation, I interviewed him myself one on one and transcript the recording, it's not that press conference and talk party.


OK. You really asked some great questions, especially the mech ones.

No buff to tank because of TvT? Oh Mr Kim...
digmouse
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
China6029 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-08-24 05:59:45
August 24 2013 05:59 GMT
#8
On August 24 2013 14:56 larse wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 24 2013 14:42 digmouse wrote:
On August 24 2013 14:33 larse wrote:
The Chinese article has been translated before:

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=422804

Nevertheless thanks for the full translation.

It's not a translation, I interviewed him myself one on one and transcript the recording, it's not that press conference and talk party.


OK. You really asked some great questions, especially the mech ones.

No buff to tank because of TvT? Oh Mr Kim...

Praise the almighty lord monk for some of the great questions! And blame him for saying snipe on Zealots lol.
TranslatorIf you want to ask anything about Chinese esports, send me a PM or follow me @nerddigmouse.
Mahanaim
Profile Joined December 2012
Korea (South)1002 Posts
August 24 2013 06:56 GMT
#9
Integrating ghosts into the mech composition is ridiculously good, especially against immortals. But considering how gas-intensive mech is, it isn't that easy to find the sweet spot of producing ghosts. Well at least Terrans have something to counter the immortals, so I personally am willing to see how things develop in the long run, especially with the new possible change coming to Terran upgrades.
Celebrating Starcraft since... a long time ago.
Sapphire.lux
Profile Joined July 2010
Romania2620 Posts
August 24 2013 07:04 GMT
#10
Great questions!

The mech hate is incredible especially given all the HOTS marketing and promises.
Head Coach Park: "They should buff tanks!"
TheEmulator
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
27991 Posts
August 24 2013 07:11 GMT
#11
Nice interview.
Administrator
hansonslee
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States2026 Posts
August 24 2013 08:12 GMT
#12
"We do believe that improvement can be made for average players' playing experience, especially in team games. It's a thing we are looking into right now, and in the future hopefully we'll have something that really fits our game and make improvement to Battle.net that way."

Thank you! Finally, they are focusing on improving the experience especially with team games! Good to see that Blizzard is not primarily focused on balancing.
Seed's # 1 fan!!! #ForVengeance
Kaleidos
Profile Joined October 2010
Italy172 Posts
August 24 2013 08:41 GMT
#13
Nice interview. When i read "Oracle is the unit to go for that we see all game long" i was oh so sad T_T
29 fps
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
United States5713 Posts
August 24 2013 09:01 GMT
#14
good interview. i hope they do something about the arcade.
4v4 is a battle of who has the better computer.
Vindicare605
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States14552 Posts
August 24 2013 09:02 GMT
#15
So he recognizes that tank damage in TvP isn't the problem but rather the hard counter relationship tanks have with Zealots and Immortals.

Do they plan on ever DOING anything about that?

It's a fundamental problem that came with SC2 that has never been solved. Hard counters suck. It's as Day9 put so eloquently in a daily a long time ago, you don't make Immortals to counter Tanks, you make Immortals so that the Terran stops making Tanks. (original quote regarded Roaches)

It's a dumb, dumb dynamic.
@KTVindicare:twitch.tv/ktvindicare youtube.com/ktvindicare Host of the Geeky Bartender podcast: https://open.spotify.com/show/37cUiMLwFIZ4fNz6qLGxjZ?si=LhiiC08lRgCGjs4Muoma3g&dl_branch=1
pmp10
Profile Joined April 2012
3006 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-08-24 09:10:32
August 24 2013 09:09 GMT
#16
ZvZs improved and fun to watch?
Must be the new swarm host vs swarm host style.
Very entertaining alright.

On August 24 2013 18:02 Vindicare605 wrote:
So he recognizes that tank damage in TvP isn't the problem but rather the hard counter relationship tanks have with Zealots and Immortals.

Do they plan on ever DOING anything about that?

They already said that not before LotV.
And even then all that can happen is adding a hard-counter to immortal.
Teoita
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Italy12237 Posts
August 24 2013 09:38 GMT
#17
On August 24 2013 14:53 avilo wrote:
Good interview and good questions. Their answers about mech are quite infuriating to read. Especially this part:

"If you increase the damage a bit, it won't change much because Immortals and Zealots have a really harsh counter relationship with Tanks..."

So they recognize no matter what they change with Terran mech...the main issue is the immortal being an extreme hard counter to mech/tanks TvP..soooo...how about they do something about it

Whoever the interviewer was, props to you for actually knowing your shiot about the game and asking amazing questions.
edit:
Show nested quote +
On August 24 2013 14:42 digmouse wrote:
On August 24 2013 14:33 larse wrote:
The Chinese article has been translated before:

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=422804

Nevertheless thanks for the full translation.

It's not a translation, I interviewed him myself one on one and transcript the recording, it's not that press conference and talk party.


aha, good stuff


The questions came from the TL Strategy staff
ModeratorProtoss all-ins are like a wok. You can throw whatever you want in there and it will turn out alright.
p14c
Profile Joined May 2010
Vatican City State431 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-08-24 09:46:25
August 24 2013 09:44 GMT
#18
This guy thinks the best indicator for skill is spamming forcefields..It's a joke. SC2 will never be a good game as long as this guy will be in charge.
PS: I hope hellbat will never come back. It was a stupid unit in the first place.
Game Over, Man! Game Over!
myRZeth
Profile Joined June 2011
Germany1047 Posts
August 24 2013 09:46 GMT
#19
great questions, awful answers
YyapSsap
Profile Joined September 2010
New Zealand1511 Posts
August 24 2013 09:48 GMT
#20
On August 24 2013 18:02 Vindicare605 wrote:
So he recognizes that tank damage in TvP isn't the problem but rather the hard counter relationship tanks have with Zealots and Immortals.

Do they plan on ever DOING anything about that?

It's a fundamental problem that came with SC2 that has never been solved. Hard counters suck. It's as Day9 put so eloquently in a daily a long time ago, you don't make Immortals to counter Tanks, you make Immortals so that the Terran stops making Tanks. (original quote regarded Roaches)

It's a dumb, dumb dynamic.


Thats why they created the a hard counter to immortals called.. warhounds! except this unit was like a ranged pre-nerf hellbat lol They really need to go back to the drawing boards, and realise that hard counters need to be toned down in return for being generally more effective against everything else.

I hope one day they really re-design immortal and the colossus. The latter especially, should have some sort of a weakness on a similar level as the siege tank.
1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 20m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 807
Kelazhur 285
Rex 136
UpATreeSC 132
Trikslyr98
TKL 97
TY 84
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 4004
Shuttle 2818
BeSt 1319
Soulkey 929
Light 632
Snow 493
hero 403
Stork 371
firebathero (twitch) 323
Soma 278
[ Show more ]
Mini 207
sorry 159
EffOrt 150
ggaemo 140
firebathero 92
Rush 88
Hyun 56
sas.Sziky 46
Mind 44
Jumperer 18
Shine 8
Dota 2
Gorgc6633
qojqva4766
febbydoto104
Fuzer 7
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
fl0m2331
kennyS1366
Foxcn185
Other Games
Stewie2K5172
singsing4294
hiko3950
crisheroes714
Lowko539
ArmadaUGS404
KnowMe374
djWHEAT186
rubinoeu12
Organizations
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
ESL CS:GO36729
ESL CS:GO B22292
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Tertiary Stream3729
Other Games
B2W.Neo2892
StarCraft 2
Esl_sc2242
ESL.tv242
Other Games
BasetradeTV197
Dota 2
BeyondTheSummit194
StarCraft: Brood War
StarcraftVOD2
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 19 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• MindelVK 20
• Aristorii13
• LUISG 10
• Freeedom5
• IndyKCrew
• Poblha
• aXEnki
• intothetv
• Gussbus
• Kozan
• Alpha X_
• LaughNgamez Trovo
• Laughngamez YouTube
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• sscaitournament1
• Michael_bg 1
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
Upcoming Events
Big Brain Bouts
20m
Demi vs Ashbringer
Kelazhur vs TriGGeR
Clem vs HeRoMaRinE
RotterdaM807
PSISTORM Gaming Misc
7h 20m
The PondCast
18h 20m
OSC
19h 20m
Showmatch
22h 20m
BSL: ProLeague
1d
CSO Cup
1d
ESL Pro Tour
1d 10h
BSL: ProLeague
2 days
DaveTesta Events
2 days
[ Show More ]
ESL Pro Tour
3 days
ESL Pro Tour
3 days
IEM
4 days
IEM
5 days
IEM
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

KOR-CHN Invitational League 2: Saber vs Mihu
OSC Championship Season 10
NGS Storm Division S6 Qual. 5
BLAST Premier Spring Groups

Ongoing

BSL Season 16
KCM Race Survival 2023 Season 1
KCM Ladies Race Survival 2023 Season 1
Individual Golden League
Strength Challenge 30K
Tournament of Honor
Y.H Spring cup
FS Mania
RISS Season 1
Spring Cup Season 4: Korea
Spring Cup 4: Chinese Qualifier
Spring Cup 4: Chinese Qualifier 1
WTL 2022 Winter
NGS Storm Division S6
ESL Challenger League S44 NA
ESL Challenger League S44 EU
ESL Challenger League S44 AP
IEM Katowice 2023

Upcoming

Hongtu Solo League S5: KOR
ASL Season 15
Spring Cup Season 4
Spring Cup Season 4: China
Spring Cup 4: Chinese Qualifier 2
CHN vs KOR Week31
#PassionCraft Knockout
IEM Katowice 2023
BLAST.tv Paris Major 2023
ESL Challenger Melbourne 2023
BLAST.tv Paris 2023: EU RMR B
BLAST.tv Paris 2023: EU RMR A
BLAST.tv Paris 2023: AME RMR
BLAST.tv Paris 2023: APAC RMR
BLAST Premier Spring AME Showdown
BLAST Premier Spring EU Showdown
ESL Pro League Season 17
CCT Central EU Malta Finals
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2023 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.