EPT
.New Spore Cannons ? - Page 11
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
docvoc
United States5491 Posts
. | ||
|
Loxley
Netherlands2480 Posts
On June 16 2013 10:27 Wojciech Zywny wrote: wtf blizzard??? this is going to make zerg so op god david kim is such an idiot Yeah, I don't think you understand this topic. But I like how you call other people idiots. | ||
|
Poffel
471 Posts
 | ||
|
BronzeKnee
United States5226 Posts
| ||
|
Rainbow Cuddles
United States486 Posts
| ||
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
On June 16 2013 10:27 Wojciech Zywny wrote: wtf blizzard??? this is going to make zerg so op god david kim is such an idiot lol | ||
|
Wildmoon
Thailand4189 Posts
| ||
|
sCCrooked
Korea (South)1306 Posts
| ||
|
Epishade
United States2267 Posts
Funny idea but if Zerg gets one, Protoss should get one too. Mass muta too good against cannons that can only shoot one thing at a time. I want splash cannons for Toss too. | ||
|
Oiseaux
United States676 Posts
On June 16 2013 13:19 Epishade wrote: Wouldn't this completely destroy carrier interceptors? 2 or 3 shots and all the interceptors are dead. Funny idea but if Zerg gets one, Protoss should get one too. Mass muta too good against cannons that can only shoot one thing at a time. I want splash cannons for Toss too. this may be true, but you are assuming carriers are being made... on the other hand, i approve of this lolsomeness. | ||
|
00higgo
Australia119 Posts
| ||
|
Epishade
United States2267 Posts
On June 16 2013 13:25 Oiseaux wrote: this may be true, but you are assuming carriers are being made... on the other hand, i approve of this lolsomeness. Wtf does this mean? Just because carriers aren't made every game doesn't mean you shouldn't include them when balancing something that could affect them. | ||
|
Staboteur
Canada1873 Posts
On June 09 2013 19:01 Existor wrote: Terran splash vs air: - widow mine - thors - raven's seeker missile - Nuclear Missile - EMP vs vipers Protoss splash vs air: - storm - archon Zerg splash vs air: - fungal growth only Other races already have "something similar" and in a bigger amount than Zerg. You forget da mutariskuu, brah. They splash all over everything. | ||
|
Scisyhp
United States200 Posts
On June 16 2013 14:43 Staboteur wrote: You forget da mutariskuu, brah. They splash all over everything. By splash he meant area-of-affect attacks. Mutas do not do aoe. | ||
|
00higgo
Australia119 Posts
| ||
|
NiHiLuSsc2
United States50 Posts
| ||
|
Darkren
Canada1841 Posts
On June 08 2013 20:22 nimdil wrote: The latter should be balanced with +15 range upgrade for Siege Tanks for TvT purposes. Also for another upgrade Siege Tanks should fire air as well. Ultralisk should also be allowed to leap into air battle It would look like that ![[image loading]](http://fc01.deviantart.net/fs71/i/2013/111/0/4/flying_ultralisk_by_tsurakashi-d62ggiy.jpg) And it would cleave air to stop the muta wars and protoss op air | ||
|
Zato-1
Chile4253 Posts
| ||
|
dabom88
United States3483 Posts
Turrets did have a Splash upgrade in the WoL campaign, wouldn't be hard to adapt. | ||
|
shell
Portugal2722 Posts
On June 17 2013 06:11 Darkren wrote: Ultralisk should also be allowed to leap into air battle It would look like that And it would cleave air to stop the muta wars and protoss op air LOL! Ok this is too much but maybe a very expensive upgrade that could make the ultralisk jump cliffs could be manageable.. heheh ;D | ||
| ||
