|
I never said this changed anything. But you can be sure it solves not much either :D BW 2.0 happened when Kespa switched over and ESF players stopped messing around streaming and stuff to practice their ass off to not be left in the dust and be BW2.0'd themselves.
What is important is practice environment (including coaches, other players, etc..), which is really not easy to give to the foreign world.
|
|
On April 03 2013 20:41 ZenithM wrote: I never said this changed anything. But you can be sure it solves not much either :D BW 2.0 happened when Kespa switched over and ESF players stopped messing around streaming and stuff to practice their ass off to not be left in the dust and be BW2.0'd themselves.
What is important is practice environment (including coaches, other players, etc..), which is really not easy to give to the foreign world. If even some Koreans make the switch, then they will bring players, coaches, etc. with them. And it also has the added benefit of creating a greater likelihood of investment by foreign teams into foreign players who will compete in the foreign tournaments. That leads to better environments, better coaches, and better practice partners. I fail to see how this could in any way not make it better than it is now.
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On April 03 2013 20:44 sc2superfan101 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2013 20:41 ZenithM wrote: I never said this changed anything. But you can be sure it solves not much either :D BW 2.0 happened when Kespa switched over and ESF players stopped messing around streaming and stuff to practice their ass off to not be left in the dust and be BW2.0'd themselves.
What is important is practice environment (including coaches, other players, etc..), which is really not easy to give to the foreign world. If even some Koreans make the switch, then they will bring players, coaches, etc. with them. And it also has the added benefit of creating a greater likelihood of investment by foreign teams into foreign players who will compete in the foreign tournaments. That leads to better environments, better coaches, and better practice partners. I fail to see how this could in any way not make it better than it is now. if/when koreans make the switch to the other scenes, it's likely they will play out the season online and only come for the live events. i don't think they will bring much of their infrastructure over. but i'm hopeful that foreigners can get themselves together
|
On April 03 2013 20:20 opterown wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2013 20:16 Assirra wrote:On April 03 2013 20:11 opterown wrote:On April 03 2013 20:07 rasers wrote:On April 03 2013 19:42 Douillos wrote:On April 03 2013 19:17 Qikz wrote:On April 03 2013 19:03 Douillos wrote:On April 03 2013 18:58 Boonbag wrote: I think, (maybe i'm wrong and misunderstood the whole thing) that people angry and afraid it will lower the single tournament korean level are wrong. It will all remain the same, just on top of the regular individual korean leagues, you'll get a final international tournament.
What's wrong with that ?
Very positive that they add an "official" individual league for both EU / NA.
This is VERY good and the best possible move I think for trying to sanctuarise SC esport in EU/NA. Supporting EU/NA e-sports by limiting the number of koreans being able to get spots through those continents would probably have been better if you asked me. Everybody knows its going to be 16 koreans every year this way. I don't really mind, but i really think the foreigner scene is going to become the same as it was during sc:BW.... Too bad, Blizz definitily had the opportunity to avoid this! No offense, but I think that's a good thing. The top 16 at the WORLD FINALS should be the Best 16 players in the world, I want to see the best players playing at the world finals and the best games. I don't want to see a token American there because the tournament system let him through when he really isn't as good. Maybe if the non koreans want to get into the world finals they might finally work harder to practice and get on the same level. Can you imagine the difficulty of continue to practice as hard when you know that you can barely hope for a top 8 in any competition you go to?) would give the most motivation i could ever get. "oh these guys are still better than me? better fucking practice so i can finally beat them". or "better retire cos this really has no future for me." two ways to look at it Then let them retire. How do you think code B koreans must feel? they practice their ass off and the only way people will even know they exist is if they get through the hellhole known as Code A qualifiers. code b koreans actually have a decent infrastructure in order to practice their ass off, they have good coaches and teamhouses where they stay for free (i presume) and have all their basic needs provided. that infrastructure isn't there for foreigners. if we all have the attitude "let the retire" then the scene really will go nowhere. is it too hard to be positive about this announcement and hope that WCS NA and EU allows foreigners to work towards an achievable goal, increasing the number and support of casual viewers? if they can work towards something attainable, they will work harder and improve naturally anyway. it's sort of that psychological effect where if it's too hard, you don't bother trying, but if it's merely difficult, you will work to get there! happy bday btw data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" Thanks for some good posts on the subject, you should consider doing a blog-post or something similar. You have a voice to reach the multitudes ^^
The "let them rot"-attitude is surprisingly prevalent, forgetting that foreign interest carried the Korean scene for WoL for a long time. It's not a natural order that SC2, or even single-player strategy-games in general, will stay alive. The single player competitive fps-scene on PC is more or less dead. It used to have the position SC2 has now.
|
So in the end all that happens is that the top finishers of certain tournaments get seeded into Blizzcon (or wherever they'll hold their finals.) How impressive.
|
On April 03 2013 20:46 opterown wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2013 20:44 sc2superfan101 wrote:On April 03 2013 20:41 ZenithM wrote: I never said this changed anything. But you can be sure it solves not much either :D BW 2.0 happened when Kespa switched over and ESF players stopped messing around streaming and stuff to practice their ass off to not be left in the dust and be BW2.0'd themselves.
What is important is practice environment (including coaches, other players, etc..), which is really not easy to give to the foreign world. If even some Koreans make the switch, then they will bring players, coaches, etc. with them. And it also has the added benefit of creating a greater likelihood of investment by foreign teams into foreign players who will compete in the foreign tournaments. That leads to better environments, better coaches, and better practice partners. I fail to see how this could in any way not make it better than it is now. if/when koreans make the switch to the other scenes, it's likely they will play out the season online and only come for the live events. i don't think they will bring much of their infrastructure over. but i'm hopeful that foreigners can get themselves together I was under the impression that this:
NA/EU will be online until Ro16, after which they will play in a studio environment
Would ensure that they would be pretty much forced to either emigrate or not play in it. If it is a GSL style system, than they would either have to stick around for a couple of weeks to play past the Ro16 or fly back and forth every other day. (Obviously not that often but flying back and forth quite a bit. Seems to me that to ensure success, one would be wise to simply make the move rather than do the constant traveling thing)
Could be that I'm missing something though, as it seems that Blizzard has been kind of light on the details as of yet.
|
On April 03 2013 20:46 opterown wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2013 20:44 sc2superfan101 wrote:On April 03 2013 20:41 ZenithM wrote: I never said this changed anything. But you can be sure it solves not much either :D BW 2.0 happened when Kespa switched over and ESF players stopped messing around streaming and stuff to practice their ass off to not be left in the dust and be BW2.0'd themselves.
What is important is practice environment (including coaches, other players, etc..), which is really not easy to give to the foreign world. If even some Koreans make the switch, then they will bring players, coaches, etc. with them. And it also has the added benefit of creating a greater likelihood of investment by foreign teams into foreign players who will compete in the foreign tournaments. That leads to better environments, better coaches, and better practice partners. I fail to see how this could in any way not make it better than it is now. if/when koreans make the switch to the other scenes, it's likely they will play out the season online and only come for the live events. i don't think they will bring much of their infrastructure over. but i'm hopeful that foreigners can get themselves together This is what I understood as well.
|
On April 03 2013 20:29 Talin wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2013 20:13 opterown wrote:On April 03 2013 20:07 CoL_DarkstaR wrote: That's it, blizzard is officially trying to destroy esports. ._.
Instead of supporting the only healthy and half-sustainable scene by changing the access to the game (korea!) they milk every single drop out of international viewership, meanwhile destroying all local scenes by allowing ridiculous travelling. Also, what happens to OSL , GSL and Proleague?
I won't watch WCS. And anyone who does should ask himself exactly why... and no i'm not overexaggerating. This has been going on for a long time and i've had enough of it. There won't be a serious competition anywhere with blizzard trying to equalize all reagions and organizing tournaments on their own just to pleaase western people who will in turn buy some "3-day-pass" or any kind of shit. what? this is about raising the international scene to become (hopefully) as sustainable as the korean scene. having a BW-like system where KR worked but nowhere else did is not healthy for the game, or viewership. korea by itself probably isn't sustainable either since sc2 is much less popular than BW was or LoL is, so making sc2 viable internationally is the way to go about it You cannot force something like that. You cannot artificially raise it if there are no players (or there are very few) willing to do what it takes to play and compete on a higher level than they currently are. If you provide foreign-only tournaments with strong financial backing, the only effect that is going to have is to lower the standard of play further, as they need to work even less hard to get exposure and place high in such an environment with no Korean players around. This is exactly what will lead to a repeat of a Brood War era where the foreign players won't be able to take a single game off of real progamers. Exactly how I feel. You cannot force the growth of these scenes by throwing money at them in the hopes of raising general standards. It has to happen organically.
|
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On April 03 2013 20:49 sc2superfan101 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2013 20:46 opterown wrote:On April 03 2013 20:44 sc2superfan101 wrote:On April 03 2013 20:41 ZenithM wrote: I never said this changed anything. But you can be sure it solves not much either :D BW 2.0 happened when Kespa switched over and ESF players stopped messing around streaming and stuff to practice their ass off to not be left in the dust and be BW2.0'd themselves.
What is important is practice environment (including coaches, other players, etc..), which is really not easy to give to the foreign world. If even some Koreans make the switch, then they will bring players, coaches, etc. with them. And it also has the added benefit of creating a greater likelihood of investment by foreign teams into foreign players who will compete in the foreign tournaments. That leads to better environments, better coaches, and better practice partners. I fail to see how this could in any way not make it better than it is now. if/when koreans make the switch to the other scenes, it's likely they will play out the season online and only come for the live events. i don't think they will bring much of their infrastructure over. but i'm hopeful that foreigners can get themselves together I was under the impression that this: NA/EU will be online until Ro16, after which they will play in a studio environmentWould ensure that they would be pretty much forced to either emigrate or not play in it. If it is a GSL style system, than they would either have to stick around for a couple of weeks to play past the Ro16 or fly back and forth every other day. Could be that I'm missing something though, as it seems that Blizzard has been kind of light on the details as of yet. hrmm, RO16 to the finals might take a few weeks if they go by GSL scheduling, so I guess that could happen. flying back and forth is ridiculously expensive and I don't think any team, even EG, would see that as a good investment. i too await further information
On April 03 2013 20:46 m0ck wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2013 20:20 opterown wrote:On April 03 2013 20:16 Assirra wrote:On April 03 2013 20:11 opterown wrote:On April 03 2013 20:07 rasers wrote:On April 03 2013 19:42 Douillos wrote:On April 03 2013 19:17 Qikz wrote:On April 03 2013 19:03 Douillos wrote:On April 03 2013 18:58 Boonbag wrote: I think, (maybe i'm wrong and misunderstood the whole thing) that people angry and afraid it will lower the single tournament korean level are wrong. It will all remain the same, just on top of the regular individual korean leagues, you'll get a final international tournament.
What's wrong with that ?
Very positive that they add an "official" individual league for both EU / NA.
This is VERY good and the best possible move I think for trying to sanctuarise SC esport in EU/NA. Supporting EU/NA e-sports by limiting the number of koreans being able to get spots through those continents would probably have been better if you asked me. Everybody knows its going to be 16 koreans every year this way. I don't really mind, but i really think the foreigner scene is going to become the same as it was during sc:BW.... Too bad, Blizz definitily had the opportunity to avoid this! No offense, but I think that's a good thing. The top 16 at the WORLD FINALS should be the Best 16 players in the world, I want to see the best players playing at the world finals and the best games. I don't want to see a token American there because the tournament system let him through when he really isn't as good. Maybe if the non koreans want to get into the world finals they might finally work harder to practice and get on the same level. Can you imagine the difficulty of continue to practice as hard when you know that you can barely hope for a top 8 in any competition you go to?) would give the most motivation i could ever get. "oh these guys are still better than me? better fucking practice so i can finally beat them". or "better retire cos this really has no future for me." two ways to look at it Then let them retire. How do you think code B koreans must feel? they practice their ass off and the only way people will even know they exist is if they get through the hellhole known as Code A qualifiers. code b koreans actually have a decent infrastructure in order to practice their ass off, they have good coaches and teamhouses where they stay for free (i presume) and have all their basic needs provided. that infrastructure isn't there for foreigners. if we all have the attitude "let the retire" then the scene really will go nowhere. is it too hard to be positive about this announcement and hope that WCS NA and EU allows foreigners to work towards an achievable goal, increasing the number and support of casual viewers? if they can work towards something attainable, they will work harder and improve naturally anyway. it's sort of that psychological effect where if it's too hard, you don't bother trying, but if it's merely difficult, you will work to get there! happy bday btw data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" Thanks for some good posts on the subject, you should consider doing a blog-post or something similar. You have a voice to reach the multitudes ^^ The "let them rot"-attitude is surprisingly prevalent, forgetting that foreign interest carried the Korean scene for WoL for a long time. It's not a natural order that SC2, or even single-player strategy-games in general, will stay alive. The single player competitive fps-scene on PC is more or less dead. It used to have the position SC2 has now. i will probably blog my thoughts about this after it settles down a bit :p (maybe next week when i have a week off). i didn't manage to follow this event live and am still collecting my opinion about it all haha.
On April 03 2013 20:50 Brett wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2013 20:29 Talin wrote:On April 03 2013 20:13 opterown wrote:On April 03 2013 20:07 CoL_DarkstaR wrote: That's it, blizzard is officially trying to destroy esports. ._.
Instead of supporting the only healthy and half-sustainable scene by changing the access to the game (korea!) they milk every single drop out of international viewership, meanwhile destroying all local scenes by allowing ridiculous travelling. Also, what happens to OSL , GSL and Proleague?
I won't watch WCS. And anyone who does should ask himself exactly why... and no i'm not overexaggerating. This has been going on for a long time and i've had enough of it. There won't be a serious competition anywhere with blizzard trying to equalize all reagions and organizing tournaments on their own just to pleaase western people who will in turn buy some "3-day-pass" or any kind of shit. what? this is about raising the international scene to become (hopefully) as sustainable as the korean scene. having a BW-like system where KR worked but nowhere else did is not healthy for the game, or viewership. korea by itself probably isn't sustainable either since sc2 is much less popular than BW was or LoL is, so making sc2 viable internationally is the way to go about it You cannot force something like that. You cannot artificially raise it if there are no players (or there are very few) willing to do what it takes to play and compete on a higher level than they currently are. If you provide foreign-only tournaments with strong financial backing, the only effect that is going to have is to lower the standard of play further, as they need to work even less hard to get exposure and place high in such an environment with no Korean players around. This is exactly what will lead to a repeat of a Brood War era where the foreign players won't be able to take a single game off of real progamers. Exactly how I feel. You cannot force the growth of these scenes by throwing money at them in the hopes of raising general standards. It has to happen organically. how would you induce such organic growth then? it's pretty apparent that at this stage, there's no hope for foreigners as a whole to be competitive. rather than letting the scene die off into something like BW, how else would you try and salvage this?
|
Nobody is saying that we should let the foreigners rot, because they're hardly rotting as it is.
But you need to keep in mind that for their objective quality, many are already being paid a TON more than their Korean equivalents. Now what some people advocate is establishing an environment where that proportion is going to be even more lopsided than it already is.
Teams and players didn't feel it was necessary to set up proper training structure and objectives so far. Putting them in an even more comfortable environment is the last thing that will convince them to do that. It really comes down to basic economic principles, and what is being suggested only sets the standards lower (thus the performance will eventually be lower as well).
|
What about South America and Australia?
|
It's maybe also a problem of standards and living conditions. For foreigners, "pro-gamer" means someone who earns a salary by playing the game. So many foreigners want to be fully paid, else they continue school and treat gaming as a part-time thing. For Koreans, it just means someone who isn't making money by doing anything other than gaming. It doesn't imply that you have to pay them and some even sacrifice high school to become a pro-gamer.
|
On April 03 2013 20:53 Talin wrote: Nobody is saying that we should let the foreigners rot, because they're hardly rotting as it is.
But you need to keep in mind that for their objective quality, many are already being paid a TON more than their Korean equivalents. Now what some people advocate is establishing an environment where that proportion is going to be even more lopsided than it already is.
Teams and players didn't feel it was necessary to set up proper training structure and objectives so far. Putting them in an even more comfortable environment is the last thing that will convince them to do that. It really comes down to basic economic principles, and what is being suggested only sets the standards lower (thus the performance will eventually be lower as well).
Personally, I was looking forward to the raised skill ceiling in HOTS, and watching the inferior players that train less, aka the foreigners, disappear. MLG showed that shit like this: http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/Ver/sc2/funnyarticle/new/real/secondary/rsz_since_mlg_anaheim_korean.jpg is gone for good and if you aren't willing to practice in Korea full time, and take the game as seriously as Koreans, you might as well retire.
But, nope. Blizzard insists in shoving foreigner play down our throats. I can't even begin to express my disappointment.
|
On April 03 2013 20:58 Sent. wrote: What about South America and Australia? They need to play with ping and travel.
|
On April 03 2013 21:02 Zenbrez wrote:They need to play with ping and travel.
South America, SEA and Taiwan are some notable losers in this announcement. At least for this year. Regions may be expanded in the future. Players like Sen and Moonglade will likely compete in the NA or EU qualifiers if at all.
|
I hope we will see a lot of Koreans in the NA and EU events, because i don't want the World finals, best SC2 event, etc, to be made up of 2/3 foreigners.
|
On April 03 2013 20:37 opterown wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2013 20:34 RedMosquito wrote: Im worried this is going to dilute GSL code S and make it weaker. This used to be the premier tourney in the world with the best players and the most prize money. It was a place where we could watch truly the world's best players compete all in the same tournament. MVP vs MC, Marine King, Nestea, Life ect.
Now with the region lock where are these players going to play? I could see MC deciding to play in NA where he is more likely to make it to the finals. Maybe MVP and Life will go to Europe. What will happen to code S? Surely no foreigners will choose Korea. So what we will have is a diluted Code S/OGN with all Koreans except it will be random code Bers instead of your traditional heavyweights. Just speculation but its entirely possible. i highly doubt that any S-class koreans will leave korea. there's too much pride at stake, and they lock themselves out of a whole year of domestic competition
Not only pride but i dont see a reason why they would. Either your going to try to win WCS outside of Korea or you going to try win GSL/OSL and WCS. You can still enter IEM's/DH's/MLG's etc etc if you stay in Korea and even get points probably for that.
Lower-tier Koreans who dont have a chance in code S or A might want to try their luck in WCS EU or NA but they will be out of all Korean events (besides team leagues), no way regular code S players will do that.
|
I like the new system, we will get better quality games for sure :D.
I watched 15 min of Stephano streaming yesterday night before sleeping, his play was kind of summarizing my thoughts about foreigners: Owning noobs with queen infestor on the ladder with a new account (it seems).
|
On April 03 2013 21:03 MstrJinbo wrote:Show nested quote +On April 03 2013 21:02 Zenbrez wrote:On April 03 2013 20:58 Sent. wrote: What about South America and Australia? They need to play with ping and travel. South America, SEA and Taiwan are some notable losers in this announcement. At least for this year. Regions may be expanded in the future. Players like Sen and Moonglade will likely compete in the NA or EU qualifiers if at all.
Who cares about them? They have maybe 3 solid players in total and they can move if they want.
|
|
|
|