• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 13:29
CEST 19:29
KST 02:29
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments0[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence10Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12
Community News
BSL 2025 Warsaw LAN + Legends Showmatch0Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups4WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments1SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia8Weekly Cups (Sept 1-7): MaxPax rebounds & Clem saga continues29
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft II 5.0.15 PTR Patch Notes #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy SpeCial on The Tasteless Podcast
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around
Brood War
General
Soulkey on ASL S20 BW General Discussion ASL20 General Discussion ASL TICKET LIVE help! :D NaDa's Body
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group D [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL20] Ro16 Group C BSL 2025 Warsaw LAN + Legends Showmatch
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Borderlands 3 Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
i'm really bored guys
Peanutsc
I <=> 9
KrillinFromwales
The Personality of a Spender…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2468 users

Aligulac.com changelog and feedback thread - Page 5

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 33 34 35 Next All
TheBB
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Switzerland5133 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-24 08:20:03
May 24 2013 08:16 GMT
#81
Hey,

On May 24 2013 06:36 Grayson Carlyle wrote:
In other words, if a player with a rating of 1900 goes 1-0 against 4 players whose average rating is 1700, is it the same as going 4-0 against a single player in a single series?

Yes, this is the same.

On May 24 2013 06:36 Grayson Carlyle wrote:
The former's median outcome from prediction, on a game per game basis would be the sum of the expected median outcomes of each individual one: 4-0. Whereas the expected median outcome of the latter is 4-3.

Ah, the median predicted outcome (MPO) you see on the prediction pages are not the same as the expected outcome (EO) you see on the adjustment overview. The differences are:
  • MPO is always integral, while EO are real numbers.
  • When calculating MPO, we don't know how long the match will go. It's a measure of the closeness of the players, not a good estimate of the length of the match (in fact, it will overestimate match lengths consistently). The EO is expected score given the total number of games in the match.
So in your example, if the 1900 guy 4-0's the 1700 guy, that is four games. The EO can then be something like 2.8-1.2, or some other numbers who sum up to four. Of course these are impossible scores to actually get in a Bo7, even if we were to round them off, but the match format is inconsequential to the rating calculator.

So the EO is actual expected score given the games that were actually played (and is comparable to the same concept in Elo ratings), while the MPO is just "our best guess" at the actually possible outcome that would be least surprising.

Hope that clarified things.
http://aligulac.com || Barcraft Switzerland! || Zerg best race. || Stats-poster extraordinaire.
Grayson Carlyle
Profile Joined September 2010
Canada219 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-24 14:13:43
May 24 2013 14:13 GMT
#82
That does clarify it a bit, but it doesn't address the issue that the expected outcome of a Bo1 is always on average 50% away from actual possible outcomes, so playing Bo1s still has a larger impact on a player's rating (both up and down) than longer series, whereas longer series are actually a better indication of a player's true rating, but they will inevitably have a lesser effect on the accuracy.
Take what ye can
TheBB
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Switzerland5133 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-24 14:49:07
May 24 2013 14:47 GMT
#83
On May 24 2013 23:13 Grayson Carlyle wrote:
playing Bo1s still has a larger impact on a player's rating (both up and down) than longer series

I don't know why you say that, I told you that the distribution of the games into matches has no effect.

Playing four Bo1s against the same person and winning them all 1-0 has exactly the same effect as playing one Bo7 and winning it 4-0.

Playing one Bo1 and winning it 1-0 will gain you about one quarter of the points as playing one Bo7 and winning it 4-0. (Because in the first scenario there are only a quarter of the games).

In a longer match you can get closer to the expected outcome overall, but of course a longer match means more games, so your rating will change that much more.
http://aligulac.com || Barcraft Switzerland! || Zerg best race. || Stats-poster extraordinaire.
KillerDucky
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States498 Posts
May 24 2013 14:56 GMT
#84
Grayson: If you take several individual BO1s together, the average of the *absolute value* of the difference between the expected and actual outcome is 0.5. But you should not be ignoring the sign of the difference. Some will be wins and some losses.


MarineKingPrime Forever!
Grayson Carlyle
Profile Joined September 2010
Canada219 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-24 16:05:58
May 24 2013 16:04 GMT
#85
On May 24 2013 23:47 TheBB wrote:
Playing four Bo1s against the same person and winning them all 1-0 has exactly the same effect as playing one Bo7 and winning it 4-0.

In a longer match you can get closer to the expected outcome overall, but of course a longer match means more games, so your rating will change that much more.


That's my point though, is that playing 4 Bo1s should not have the same effect since it is impossible for them to be anywhere close to the expected outcome except in a situation where a player is highly favoured over the other. The possible outcomes of 4 Bo1s against different people is far more limited and doesn't give nearly as much useful, predictive power as someone winning a Bo7 4-0. The latter is very significant for determining skill, whereas the Bo1s are not significant. However, they both have the same effect on rating.
Take what ye can
TheBB
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Switzerland5133 Posts
May 24 2013 16:38 GMT
#86
Sorry, but I really can't understand why it's less significant for someone to win four Bo1s in a row than to win a Bo7 4-0, since they are the exact same thing.

If the expected outcome of a single game is 0.5-0.5, then after four Bo1s it's possible to be off by 2, 1, or 0, and after a Bo7 it's possible to be off by 2, 1.5, 1, 0.5 or 0. It provides finer resolution but the extremes are identical.
http://aligulac.com || Barcraft Switzerland! || Zerg best race. || Stats-poster extraordinaire.
KillerDucky
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States498 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-05-24 16:55:45
May 24 2013 16:46 GMT
#87
If you 4-0 someone, why should it matter if it was part of a BO7 (cut short because you already won) or 4 individual BO1s? Don't they both show exactly the same information? They played 4 times, and one player won all 4. Why should it matter if it was part of a match or not? If they played 3 more games, the previous 4-0 result should have no impact on the results of the next games.

If you are talking about psychological effects, yes those are ignored by pretty much all rating systems. There are all kinds of things outside of the game that are ignored -- like how much sleep the player got before the match etc.

==============
ETA an example conversation:
KD: Hey aligulac, TerranOP beat ZergSux 4-0. What are their new ratings?
Aligulac: KD, first you need to tell me, was the 4-0 part of a BO7? Or Two BO3s? Or 4 BO1s? Or maybe it's a BO101, but they had to stop early?
KD: I don't know, I just know they played 4 games and TerranOP won them all.
Aligulac: Sorry I can't update their ratings without knowing what the match format was.

This simply isn't the way rating systems work. They always assume each game is an independent event.


MarineKingPrime Forever!
KillerDucky
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States498 Posts
May 24 2013 17:15 GMT
#88
Different subject: I saw the graph of points transfer from foreigners to Koreans. You could go back to the beginning and increase the initial seeded ratings of Koreans until the points transfer is near zero.
MarineKingPrime Forever!
TheBB
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Switzerland5133 Posts
May 24 2013 17:20 GMT
#89
On May 25 2013 02:15 KillerDucky wrote:
Different subject: I saw the graph of points transfer from foreigners to Koreans. You could go back to the beginning and increase the initial seeded ratings of Koreans until the points transfer is near zero.

Yeah, I've thought about doing exactly this. I'm sure it would help a lot with these perceived problems.
http://aligulac.com || Barcraft Switzerland! || Zerg best race. || Stats-poster extraordinaire.
TheBB
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Switzerland5133 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-01 15:46:01
June 01 2013 13:48 GMT
#90
The most significant improvements made over the last month:

Stories: yellow dots on players' rating charts to show important career events. Also red dots for team switches.

Added comparison feature to help compare players directly against each other.

Improved error/success/warning/info messages for every page.

Player match history filtering significantly improved.

Condensed the small events lists.

Predictions are now default best of 1.

When searching for events, you can now use quotes to improve results (code S used to match code A because the S matches the S in GSL, now you can write "code s" to get what you want).

URL shortener function on every page (button on the bottom.)
http://aligulac.com || Barcraft Switzerland! || Zerg best race. || Stats-poster extraordinaire.
Grovbolle
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Denmark3807 Posts
June 01 2013 21:10 GMT
#91
Also

I've been promising a change in the rating algorithm for a while now, and finally it's here. The changes are numerous, but the most significant are:

Koreans now start with 1200 points, not 1000. This might be a bit controversial, but it goes a long way to fixing the rating discrepancy between the Korean and foreign scenes, and it is justified by the numbers.
Offline games are now weighted heavier than online games by a factor of 1.5. This has sped up the point transfer from ESF to KeSPA.
There are no longer any "fake games" in added to avoid infinities.
I won't promise that this is the final version, however!
Lies, damned lies and statistics: http://aligulac.com
fezvez
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
France3021 Posts
June 01 2013 21:16 GMT
#92
A very small mistake, but in the OP, there is a milestone set in 2014 (rather than obviously 2013)

Apart from that, thanks for your job. It has de facto replaced TLPD for me. That's a damn awesome website.
Dumbledore
Profile Joined April 2011
Sweden725 Posts
June 01 2013 21:23 GMT
#93
2014-04-20: Links to Aligulac player profiles on Liquipedia.

2014 already? O.O
Have a nice day ;)
TheBB
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Switzerland5133 Posts
June 01 2013 21:25 GMT
#94
I guess now is as good a time as any to reveal that I'm the next doctor.
http://aligulac.com || Barcraft Switzerland! || Zerg best race. || Stats-poster extraordinaire.
Boucot
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
France15997 Posts
June 01 2013 21:25 GMT
#95
You killed the ForGGeddon, I will never forgive you.
Former SC2 writer for Millenium - twitter.com/Boucot
Wodger
Profile Joined October 2008
Scotland380 Posts
June 01 2013 21:26 GMT
#96
You're not really using statistics? you traveled to the future and know all the results?
Grovbolle
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Denmark3807 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-06-01 21:37:32
June 01 2013 21:37 GMT
#97
On June 02 2013 06:26 Wodger wrote:
You're not really using statistics? you traveled to the future and know all the results?

* Doom zoom*
Lies, damned lies and statistics: http://aligulac.com
PhoenixVoid
Profile Blog Joined December 2011
Canada32742 Posts
June 01 2013 21:39 GMT
#98
The recent model of basing the calculations seems to be the move in the right direction. I'm pleased with the increase to Korean numbers, and changing online tournaments to weigh less than offline is just perfect. Now when I look at the rankings, it seems reasonable and accurate because the inflation from online games is gone and KeSPA is better represented.
I'm afraid of demented knife-wielding escaped lunatic libertarian zombie mutants
edwahn
Profile Joined March 2011
New Zealand121 Posts
June 01 2013 21:40 GMT
#99
Love the new update. I think the offline factor is absolutely the right thing to do. People remember champions for offline tournaments, not online ones!

The Hall of Fame now much more resembles my memory of who I thought were dominant. Thanks for the hard work!
Grovbolle
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Denmark3807 Posts
June 01 2013 21:43 GMT
#100
On June 02 2013 06:40 edwahn wrote:
Love the new update. I think the offline factor is absolutely the right thing to do. People remember champions for offline tournaments, not online ones!

The Hall of Fame now much more resembles my memory of who I thought were dominant. Thanks for the hard work!

The HoF wasn't really taken that much into consideration, we all agreed that it needed som rework. I guess this update had a good side effect on that as well
Lies, damned lies and statistics: http://aligulac.com
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 33 34 35 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 16h 31m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
UpATreeSC 219
JuggernautJason133
ProTech90
Codebar 36
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 25154
Bisu 1528
EffOrt 685
Mini 447
Hyuk 288
Larva 160
Soulkey 116
ggaemo 101
hero 97
Rush 95
[ Show more ]
Hyun 39
Aegong 37
ToSsGirL 25
Yoon 22
scan(afreeca) 17
Sexy 9
IntoTheRainbow 7
sas.Sziky 4
Dota 2
Gorgc7450
qojqva3572
XcaliburYe165
Fuzer 76
League of Legends
Trikslyr60
Counter-Strike
ScreaM1239
fl0m930
Other Games
gofns24107
tarik_tv22015
FrodaN1318
Beastyqt517
Lowko329
RotterdaM261
Hui .236
ArmadaUGS123
C9.Mang080
QueenE58
mouzStarbuck40
NeuroSwarm33
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Reevou 1
• intothetv
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki9
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2737
• WagamamaTV497
League of Legends
• Nemesis3966
• TFBlade666
Other Games
• imaqtpie274
• Shiphtur215
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
16h 31m
Zoun vs Classic
Map Test Tournament
17h 31m
Korean StarCraft League
1d 9h
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
1d 14h
RSL Revival
1d 16h
Reynor vs Cure
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
Online Event
2 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
LiuLi Cup
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-09-10
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL World Championship of Poland 2025
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.