Fantasy Proleague '12-13 Round 1 - Page 18
Forum Index > SC2 General |
View results and standings here. | ||
jinsanity
United States137 Posts
| ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
phanto
Sweden708 Posts
I avoided Zerg a bit since I think they will be nerfed into the ground during this season. | ||
Tobblish
Sweden6404 Posts
Main Team 4 ![]() 7 ![]() 2 ![]() 5 ![]() 2 ![]() 7 ![]() 3 [tlpd#teams##sc2-korean]STX Soul[/tlpd] Anti Team 3 ![]() 8 ![]() 2 ![]() ![]() ![]() Showed great results and have no doubts he will be a vital part of the CJ lineup. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() STX: Are you kidding me with that lineup, they have an very good chance of beating SKT in the first round. 3 points? STEAL! ![]() ![]() ![]() | ||
S_SienZ
1878 Posts
| ||
AlternativeEgo
Sweden17309 Posts
Big thanks to figq for his post | ||
amazingxkcd
GRAND OLD AMERICA16375 Posts
On December 08 2012 01:32 S_SienZ wrote: How does trading rules apply for 1 point players? You can't trade them until they rise in price or? You can only trade for players who are 0 points. | ||
Coolhwip
Sweden1381 Posts
| ||
rawrthedog
175 Posts
Main Team 4 ![]() 2 ![]() 2 ![]() 8 ![]() 7 ![]() 3 ![]() 4 [tlpd#teams##sc2-korean]Samsung Khan[/tlpd] Anti Team 4 ![]() 5 ![]() 4 ![]() really think bbyong will do well this season, and again 4 points is cheap as chips, picked terminator cause i had to pick one protoss :D, bisu for the anti team seems like a given at this stage, to call him unimpressive would be an understatement | ||
ROOTCatZ
Peru1226 Posts
On December 07 2012 08:30 motbob wrote: 4 Zergs on team, 3 Terrans on anti-team. Can't lose. I got about the oppossite ![]() | ||
andrea20
Canada441 Posts
On December 08 2012 01:32 S_SienZ wrote: How does trading rules apply for 1 point players? You can't trade them until they rise in price or? The true value of each player is calculated each week according to their performance. If your 1 point player overachieves, his true value will increase, and then you can trade "up". | ||
clever_us
United States329 Posts
Main Team 1 ![]() 3 ![]() 10 ![]() 7 ![]() 3 ![]() 3 ![]() 3 [tlpd#teams##sc2-korean]KT Rolster[/tlpd] Anti Team 5 ![]() 5 ![]() 3 ![]() Okay so a lot of explanation coming :D I am operating under 2 basic assumptions: 1, that the infestor nerf is bigger than people realize yet, and 2, that KT vs EGL is going to be a close game that will probably go to ace. Explanation in descending order of point cost: ![]() + Show Spoiler + herO[jOin] is playing ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() KT Rolster was my team pick because I don't see them losing in the first round, and expect them to outperform a lot of teams that cost more than 3. Flash is only going to get better this season. This is another place I might do some trading depending on how well they do in the first round. And if he wins I could always trade him for HerO or TaeJa in the future. ![]() Anti-Team Explanation ![]() ![]() ![]() Note: it physically pains me not to pick ![]() | ||
PonceDeLEGABE
United States117 Posts
| ||
Melliflue
United Kingdom1389 Posts
On December 07 2012 13:23 monk. wrote: The points are not necessarily directly based on how good a player is, but rather on how many points a player will score under the system. Baby one of T8's few ace's while Taeja has a lot of competition. Also, Taeja will probably be traveling more and is already guaranteed not to be playing his first match, which is 1/7th his point potential. aka Terminator But in the week 1 matchups, Sang is down as zerg whereas Terminator is protoss (I thought). Did he switch races or is that a mistake in the OP? | ||
Killer Instinct
Romania159 Posts
![]() | ||
LuckyMacro
United States1482 Posts
On December 08 2012 04:01 Killer Instinct wrote: I have a feeling that ![]() Bisu the new Roro? ![]() | ||
Bibbit
Canada5377 Posts
On December 08 2012 04:01 Killer Instinct wrote: I have a feeling that ![]() It's really weird. I could understand if he cost a lot of points, then it would kinda make sense to stick him on the anti-team given his kinda poor performance. But for only 4 points, it feels like a huge risk for not that much reward. >_> | ||
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
On December 08 2012 04:14 Bibbit wrote: It's really weird. I could understand if he cost a lot of points, then it would kinda make sense to stick him on the anti-team given his kinda poor performance. But for only 4 points, it feels like a huge risk for not that much reward. >_> I think a lot of people just don't fully understand the anti-team system, by picking Bisu you also lose points every time SKT wins a match, even if he doesn't win himself. He's also likely to be played in every single match so you have to hope he loses almost every time, for 4 points you can get a player that doesn't play in every match and isn't on such a good team. | ||
RusHXceL
United States1004 Posts
| ||
GeneralSnoop
United States142 Posts
weren't the points for those players lowered to make up for their absence already? it seems like double-compensation. EDIT: maybe there could be tax-free trading for these players after week 1? | ||
| ||