| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
TheAmazombie
United States3714 Posts
On August 23 2012 18:26 ElephantBaby wrote: Because they are pros, GSL players are just semi pros. What? Define a pro. While some of the GSL players are not making a ton of money and a few are splitting playing with school, most of them are playing full time and some are really monetarily successful. | ||
|
Demorase
136 Posts
| ||
|
Garnet
Vietnam9049 Posts
| ||
|
BanditX
United States78 Posts
GomTV is best. And will continue to be the best at this rate. | ||
|
dontstopmenow
China8 Posts
| ||
|
Azera
3800 Posts
| ||
|
Skelith
Sweden101 Posts
Sad but inevitable. | ||
|
Qikz
United Kingdom12042 Posts
Just let your players play if they want to (they said they did). | ||
|
geno
United States1404 Posts
There is no reason they couldn't have left GSL participation up to the individual, or even the team. People might have understood if players in playoff teams chose not to participate or if players who are still really behind the curve in SC2 chose to step aside for an extra GSL or two. But to force every KeSPA player to stay away from the GSL is another thing entirely. Not to mention the timing of it all, this comes out right after all the GSL players have basically committed to the OSL and gone through group selection amicably... This just feels way too much like the type of thing I remember KeSPA for. So much for "harmony." | ||
|
rhs408
United States904 Posts
| ||
|
Kommander
Philippines4950 Posts
On August 23 2012 18:28 TheAmazombie wrote: What? Define a pro. While some of the GSL players are not making a ton of money and a few are splitting playing with school, most of them are playing full time and some are really monetarily successful. KeSPA gives out progamer licenses. GSL players don't have them, so by KeSPA standards, they are semi-pros or amateurs. | ||
|
Leetley
1796 Posts
On August 23 2012 16:51 Antimatterz wrote: Jesus KeSPA, just let them play. You are basically taking opportunities for income and exposure away from the teams and their players. You said it. LET THEM PLAY! | ||
|
TheAmazombie
United States3714 Posts
On August 23 2012 18:32 Kommander wrote: KeSPA gives out progamer licenses. GSL players don't have them, so by KeSPA standards, they are semi-pros or amateurs. Gotcha, by KeSPa standards, but not by realistic standards. Thanks for clearing up what you were saying there. Yeah, it is a big joke at this point. | ||
|
GolemMadness
Canada11044 Posts
| ||
|
Ysellian
Netherlands9029 Posts
| ||
|
Chenz
Sweden1197 Posts
On August 23 2012 18:32 Kommander wrote: KeSPA gives out progamer licenses. GSL players don't have them, so by KeSPA standards, they are semi-pros or amateurs. But by the definition of the word, many GSL players are progamers. I'm honestly disgusted that a tournament organizer has this amount of control that KeSPA has over players participating in their league. Here's to hoping players will break away from KeSPA, but I doubt that will ever happen. | ||
|
Headnoob
Australia2108 Posts
| ||
|
legaton
France1763 Posts
| ||
|
sushiman
Sweden2691 Posts
Essentially, GSL could be too big of a time investment if you start losing your players in Code A-limbo. My guess is that KeSPA would be more accommodating if they knew their players could actually win the tournament right of the bat instead of months of qualifiers against more established players. The OSL is far better in that regard - less time involved, better chance of winning. | ||
|
anrimayu
United States875 Posts
And they have the balls to say Blizzard is "money grabbing cunts." Fuck Kespa. | ||
| ||
|
|
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
OSC
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
OSC
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
Serral vs Bunny
ByuN vs GgMaChine
CranKy Ducklings
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
