| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Shiori
3815 Posts
On August 18 2012 01:34 PatouPower wrote: Well, I don't know if you can call that a perfect timing anymore if you are 10/15 minerals late because you didn't boost  I don't think any build in any matchup is so tight that a 2-3 second (of Blizzard time) difference is the deciding factor. If it is, you probably shouldn't be using that build. | ||
|
sockfolder
United States9 Posts
This performance of this trick is actually far more complicated that you might expect. It isn't a flat benefit like the original mineral boosting (which cut off a flat 0.5 secs off mining speed). Rather, it seems like patches in some directions or at some spots cause the workers to slow down much more than they should. I found the data I originally collected about this trick, which I calculated by making a custom map that would tell me how long it took for the full mining trip. (FYI it takes 2.8125s for the mining itself). I just tested one spot on Metalopolis (I think) for this data. (I'm not sure how to make a table on this forum) Distance From CC || Normal Mining Time | Boosted Mining Time | Time Saved 6.5765 || 6.5625 | 6.375 | 0.1875 7.5664 || 7.5625 | 7.1875 | 0.375 6.8007 || 6.6875 | 6.4375 | 0.25 7.6322 || 7.3125 | 7.1875 | 0.125 7.4330 || 7.5625 | 7.125 | 0.4375 6.5 || 7 | 6.5 | 0.5 7.1589 || 7.5625 | 7 | 0.5625 6.1847 || 6.625 | 6.375 | 0.25 So the effectiveness is quite varied. Some patches can save as much as the original mineral boosting trick, some save almost nothing. In addition, if you plot the mining time vs distance, you will see it that it is much more linear for the boosted mining time. This is why I say some patches just have oddly high mining times due to extra deceleration for the workers. I do not know the cause, or how to figure out which patches have this problem other than trial and error. This could actually be quite important for map designers, especially if the mining times are not symmetric (I haven't checked). | ||
|
TheDougler
Canada8323 Posts
On August 18 2012 04:32 sockfolder wrote: Well, now that this trick is well publicized, it will probably be fixed =/. At least it managed to survive a while. This performance of this trick is actually far more complicated that you might expect. It isn't a flat benefit like the original mineral boosting (which cut off a flat 0.5 secs off mining speed). Rather, it seems like patches in some directions or at some spots cause the workers to slow down much more than they should. I found the data I originally collected about this trick, which I calculated by making a custom map that would tell me how long it took for the full mining trip. (FYI it takes 2.8125s for the mining itself). I just tested one spot on Metalopolis (I think) for this data. (I'm not sure how to make a table on this forum) Distance From CC || Normal Mining Time | Boosted Mining Time | Time Saved 6.5765 || 6.5625 | 6.375 | 0.1875 7.5664 || 7.5625 | 7.1875 | 0.375 6.8007 || 6.6875 | 6.4375 | 0.25 7.6322 || 7.3125 | 7.1875 | 0.125 7.4330 || 7.5625 | 7.125 | 0.4375 6.5 || 7 | 6.5 | 0.5 7.1589 || 7.5625 | 7 | 0.5625 6.1847 || 6.625 | 6.375 | 0.25 So the effectiveness is quite varied. Some patches can save as much as the original mineral boosting trick, some save almost nothing. In addition, if you plot the mining time vs distance, you will see it that it is much more linear for the boosted mining time. This is why I say some patches just have oddly high mining times due to extra deceleration for the workers. I do not know the cause, or how to figure out which patches have this problem other than trial and error. This could actually be quite important for map designers, especially if the mining times are not symmetric (I haven't checked). Holy fuck you're still around! You're the poster TL needs sockfolder. Only producing QUALITY posts like this. Not the poster we deserved, but the poster we needed right now. | ||
|
StreetWise
United States594 Posts
| ||
|
PVJ
Hungary5221 Posts
On August 17 2012 04:40 niteReloaded wrote: This is almost dismissable for mineral mining. However, for gas, it may easily become the norm among the professionals because suddenly 2 workers is close to optimal mining and you can afford 1 more worker gathering minerals. Holy fuck, imagine Squirtle playing it out this way. If we count up to 3 bases that's 6 probes more, that could be like a one, one and a half minute boost for any type of aggression? Of course I don't think any non-BW pro would be able to do this type of macro. | ||
|
Al Bundy
7257 Posts
Blizzard's definition of "working as intended" may differ from the playerbase's though. | ||
|
SolarJto
United States260 Posts
| ||
|
Fencar
United States2694 Posts
On August 18 2012 01:55 Shiori wrote: *It's more like starting that CC/Hatchery/Nexus from a FE several seconds earlier; more APM for a slight economic boost, letting you hit your timing slightly earlier than the opponent was expecting, starting your third slightly earlier, meaning you have more units than your opponent at X, Y, and Z timings because of a little early game boost.I don't think any build in any matchup is so tight that a 2-3 second (of Blizzard time) difference is the deciding factor. If it is, you probably shouldn't be using that build. What he's talking about is something like the 4-gate, 1-1-1, 6/7pool, etc. Edit: *In the majority of situations. | ||
|
Fencar
United States2694 Posts
On August 18 2012 05:59 Al Bundy wrote: This makes me think, if they patch it, they will have to make the SCV not slow down in the first place, so everything will go slightly faster, making the game harder to get into for noobs ever so slightly, while making it easier for players not at the level required to do this boost in the early game.So sockfolding (2.0) is back? As long as this kind of mechanics is not intended, blizzard will remove it. Blizzard's definition of "working as intended" may differ from the playerbase's though. | ||
|
Aggros
Russian Federation1 Post
| ||
|
Infernal_dream
United States2359 Posts
| ||
|
Roachu
Sweden692 Posts
I know this will be patched but it would be so cool to see pros do this in the beginning. | ||
|
Raggamuffinoo
United Kingdom117 Posts
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/y5lLV.jpg) Then spam shift+right-click on the minerals it will stick first time. Disregarding any mineral advantage claims, this tip is very helpful to understand how acceleration affects workers and even building construction. | ||
|
Adventurekid
Sweden505 Posts
| ||
|
WMPenn
United States13 Posts
| ||
|
sekritzzz
1515 Posts
On August 19 2012 16:11 Infernal_dream wrote: This trick is so awesome it's being used by all the pros, oh wait it's not. Just like in most tournaments you don't even see pros sitting there trying to get their workers to mine on the closer patches. It's all a waste of apm. Even if you put them on the close patch it'll move eventually because they way they cycle. A lot of koreans put their workers on the closer patches, not to mention when the old mining boost trick worked they all applied it. I wouldn't be surprised if this is used more often now that it's out. | ||
|
Whatson
United States5357 Posts
| ||
|
tehemperorer
United States2183 Posts
On August 21 2012 02:08 WMPenn wrote: How close does the move command need to be to the minerals? Cause with my mouse accuracy, im sure to miss a few times haha Range can vary slightly, but has to be within 25% the distance between nexus and mineral patch it seems. Sometimes my probes hesitate/rotate after the first command, which hurts, but they seem to do that randomly and I'm pretty accurate about where I click... You do have ample time to make an accurate click if you practice just a little bit. In ladder play though I worry about pairing first and then get far patch probes to do this trick up to about 8 or 9 probes, then come back to it at about 12 probes and that's the last time I focus on it. | ||
|
tehemperorer
United States2183 Posts
On August 21 2012 02:27 sekritzzz wrote: Uhm... do you watch starcraft 2? A lot of koreans put their workers on the closer patches, not to mention when the old mining boost trick worked they all applied it. I wouldn't be surprised if this is used more often now that it's out. Did you read the OP? It's not about pairing on close patches at all. | ||
|
sekritzzz
1515 Posts
On August 21 2012 02:35 tehemperorer wrote: Did you read the OP? It's not about pairing on close patches at all. Read the quote I was replying to . | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Britney Dota 2  44046Mini 629Shuttle 559GuemChi 508Light  460Last 282Stork 251ggaemo  189firebathero 125Barracks 71[ Show more ] Counter-Strike Other Games gofns37733 B2W.Neo766 hiko447 Lowko353 crisheroes313 DeMusliM231 Mlord200 Pyrionflax152 Hui .148 Liquid`VortiX108 Mew2King55 QueenE29 Codebar2 |
|
Replay Cast
WardiTV Invitational
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
GSL
Yamato Cup
Replay Cast
Afreeca Starleague
Soma vs Jaedong
WardiTV Weekly
Monday Night Weeklies
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
