OnGameNet Dual Tournament Brackets - non KeSPA - Page 6
Forum Index > SC2 General |
Irave
United States9965 Posts
| ||
Adreme
United States5574 Posts
On July 11 2012 03:52 ragz_gt wrote: While it's somewhat true, the odds difference between BO1 and BO3 is not as big as you think. If expected win rate of Player A against Player B is 60% The chance A win a BO1 is 60% (duh) BO3 is 65% BO5 is 68% BO7 is 71% BO9 is 73% BO41 is 90% Yes but Bo1 are always more vulnerable to map imbalance than a Bo3. | ||
TelecoM
United States10673 Posts
![]() | ||
Kal_rA
United States2925 Posts
| ||
jinorazi
Korea (South)4948 Posts
these group stage formats have been bo1 since many seasons ago | ||
vorxaw
Canada245 Posts
![]() | ||
Coolness53
United States668 Posts
| ||
rysecake
United States2632 Posts
On July 11 2012 08:19 Adreme wrote: Yes but Bo1 are always more vulnerable to map imbalance than a Bo3. well that's something you had to deal with in sc1 also. map imbalance is what makes the game interesting sometimes. Savior was winning zvt on maps where t had like an 80% win rate on. He defied imbalance. | ||
Kaxon
United States117 Posts
| ||
Coolness53
United States668 Posts
On July 11 2012 09:37 rysecake wrote: well that's something you had to deal with in sc1 also. map imbalance is what makes the game interesting sometimes. Savior was winning zvt on maps where t had like an 80% win rate on. He defied imbalance. Being caught for cheating was cool too. From Liquipedia In 2010, it was discovered that he was involved in the Match Fixing Scandal, and was permanently banned from progaming by KeSPA. | ||
The Final Boss
United States1839 Posts
On July 11 2012 09:37 rysecake wrote: well that's something you had to deal with in sc1 also. map imbalance is what makes the game interesting sometimes. Savior was winning zvt on maps where t had like an 80% win rate on. He defied imbalance. Somebody's been brushing up on their TLFEs! ^^ And while I have no problem with Bo1 vs Bo3, Bo3 provides more games. As a viewer I can honestly say I want more games. | ||
rysecake
United States2632 Posts
On July 11 2012 11:42 Coolness53 wrote: Being caught for cheating was cool too. You suggesting he cheated to win? He cheated by losing for money. He's still a bonjwa, however much of an ass he is. edit: yea the way you wrote it tells me you thought he got free wins. He destroyed everyone 2006-2007. He started match fixing in 2009-2010 through throwing games for some free cash from gambling sites. Nice try though. | ||
Coolness53
United States668 Posts
On July 11 2012 11:53 rysecake wrote: You suggesting he cheated to win? He cheated by losing for money. He's still a bonjwa, however much of an ass he is. I read the article wrong. He threw the games not cheated to win games ![]() | ||
Kommander
Philippines4950 Posts
On July 11 2012 11:42 Coolness53 wrote: Being caught for cheating was cool too. I don't think that was his point though. Besides, Savior cheated to lose, not to win. Edit: nevermind you corrected it ![]() | ||
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
| ||
FakeDeath
Malaysia6060 Posts
On July 11 2012 09:37 rysecake wrote: well that's something you had to deal with in sc1 also. map imbalance is what makes the game interesting sometimes. Savior was winning zvt on maps where t had like an 80% win rate on. He defied imbalance. Oh man BW is not SC2 my friend. This remind of the current BW OSL where the majority of the players who make it though heavily were zergs. Oh the irony.XDDD | ||
Wrathsc2
United States2025 Posts
| ||
BlindKill
Australia1508 Posts
| ||
andaylin
United States10830 Posts
| ||
The Final Boss
United States1839 Posts
| ||
| ||