|
07:06 KST - method linked here has been disproved here10:54 KST - Find a full timeline of pro comments (including Spades) in the topic here.08:47 KST - Summary:Accusations of maphacking have the potential to destroy a player's career if left unaddressed. Because of the potential consequences, we should be careful about accepting unproven accusations. The principle of 'innocent until proven guilty' should be applied here. That does not mean that there has been a conclusion about this case, however, which is why this thread remains tentatively open. Please discuss with caution and use evidence to back up your claims. (also a summary post by an unnamed pro on reddit here) |
On June 06 2012 02:28 Defacer wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 02:15 Benjamin99 wrote:On June 06 2012 02:13 Mobsy wrote: Haha so funny, 6 or 7 pros now have said he hacked yet all you little kids still think you know the game better than the pros. Jesus, talk about the Dunning-Kruger effect! QFT its mindblowing people are still arguing about this. Its so obvious he cheated but I geuss people like to argue! People just want hard evidence, not 'expert analysis'. It's a serious, career ending accusation. I remember in the Trayvon Martin thread, daPhreak mentioning you should always take expert analysis with a grain of salt. It's impossible for anyone to be 100% objective about any issue, and if you look hard enough, you can find an expert to support any position you take. If Spades really does hack, some kind of hard, technical proof shouldn't be to hard to find. Until then, I'm reserving judgement. And I think a lot of criticism has nothing to do with Spades, but how his situation was handled by TL. If this is how all accusations of hacking are going to be handled in the future, I can't imagine TL being a very pleasant community. :/
It's impossible to ask for that, this isn't real life.. He can do bad at LAN and say it was Nerves.. It can play like a hacker and attribute it to game sense and luck... it goes on and on.. until eventually you just say, "Hey, It's time to cut the BS and admit you're hacking."
|
On June 06 2012 02:26 rei wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 02:20 Starshaped wrote:I'm just gonna keep quoting this until someone addresses it, because you really don't need more than one fucking instance of obvious maphack. Forget the magic scans, forget everything, just watch this one fucking moment: On June 06 2012 00:06 Starshaped wrote:On June 06 2012 00:00 the p00n wrote:On June 05 2012 23:59 Starshaped wrote: Nobody defending Spades seems to want to touch the Cloud Kingdom moment. What moment in the replay exactly are you referring to and I shall address it. 09:50 on Cloud Kingdom. Or ~35 minutes in here http://www.twitch.tv/rootcatz/b/320407912 maybe that one inch ahead forward and re siege again so his tanks are in range of the bloody ramp for an more effective contain? How about we talk about how he got owned left and right by drops all over the place?
Because he's a bad player who cannot win even with maphack?
Honestly, anyone defending the Cloud Kingdom situation amazes me.
|
Refer to Catz stream session. They do a much better job explaining than I can through text. They are spot on. Even more non biased than I'm sure many of them felt about the situation.
|
On June 06 2012 02:21 rei wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 02:19 -UMADIMSTYLIN- wrote:On June 06 2012 02:17 rei wrote:On June 06 2012 02:14 -UMADIMSTYLIN- wrote:On June 06 2012 02:12 rei wrote:On June 06 2012 02:02 PainUser wrote: I'm not invested enough to give a point by point breakdown to convince people my opinion is correct. Thats my opinion and it isn't changing. Why did you voice your opinion if you are not going to invest in enough time to bring down spades' reputation? You already invested enough time to watch all 109 of his replays, even at 8x per replay it would take you at least 5 hour straight. Why not spend a 10th of that time write up a point by point argument supported with examples of suspicious actions. He just said why, he doesn't feel the need to covince people his opinion is correct! he said why he doesn't want to do the point by point, i ask why he even bother voice his opinion as in a baseless opinion is worthless, and he should not have voiced it, read better. ok sorry, relax guy! how do you know i'm a guy? why so presumptuous? Because girls on the internet make their gender known immediately but there is nothing in your signature or profile about it.
|
On June 06 2012 02:24 PainUser wrote: He's mad U STYLIN BRO.
You should have kept your baseless opinion to yourself considering your reputation as a caster. Unless you want to put your effort where your mouth is and write up something that's worth reading, without cherry picking facts that support your argument and ignores facts that disagrees.
|
On June 06 2012 02:27 rei wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 02:22 -UMADIMSTYLIN- wrote:On June 06 2012 02:21 rei wrote:On June 06 2012 02:19 -UMADIMSTYLIN- wrote:On June 06 2012 02:17 rei wrote:On June 06 2012 02:14 -UMADIMSTYLIN- wrote:On June 06 2012 02:12 rei wrote:On June 06 2012 02:02 PainUser wrote: I'm not invested enough to give a point by point breakdown to convince people my opinion is correct. Thats my opinion and it isn't changing. Why did you voice your opinion if you are not going to invest in enough time to bring down spades' reputation? You already invested enough time to watch all 109 of his replays, even at 8x per replay it would take you at least 5 hour straight. Why not spend a 10th of that time write up a point by point argument supported with examples of suspicious actions. He just said why, he doesn't feel the need to covince people his opinion is correct! he said why he doesn't want to do the point by point, i ask why he even bother voice his opinion as in a baseless opinion is worthless, and he should not have voiced it, read better. ok sorry, relax guy! how do you know i'm a guy? why so presumptuous? Ok sorry, relax it ^_^ you better be sorry because you got owned.
And YOU come out as a douche, for sure, guy or not
|
First off I want to say that my opinion is in no way reflective of the rest of Team Liquid's or its staff. I went through three of the games but I wanted to do things a little bit differently than everyone else. I've tried to stay out of this to see if anyone can say anything conclusive, but so far it looks like very little has been changed. First of all, I went backwards through the games, thinking that the odds are that, if hacking, he would get lazier over time at covering up (although there seems to be more evidence in earlier games for whatever reason?). Another good reason to do this is that I imagine most of the analysis time has been spent on the earlier replays.
Second, rather than focus only on lucky coincidences, I focused on big mistakes that, if map hacking, a pro player should have never made. Here are my results:
Shattered Temple
- Spades let's Lucifron's hellion poke all of the way up his ramp rather than pre spreading marines at the choke (something most players do anyways)
- Spades doesn't really react to Lucifron's air build, not getting a reactor starport and skimping on vikings,
- Spades was really sloppy with the execution of his first push. He almost lost his raven and took plenty of free tank shots
- At one point Spades looks into the fog of war, I'm confused about whether or not this debunks the thing entirely, as if he had a mod shouldn't we not ever see him do that?
- He loses an entire dropship without ever reacting
- He's not prepared for Lucifron's low ground tank attack, it seems to catch Spades completely off guard
- At one point Lucifron drops a tank onto the highground in the middle of the map, why wouldn't Spades move his tanks back faster? Technically if he was using a map hack he would have seen it right away anyways since he happened to be looking there.
Daybreak
- Spades seems to spam a lot when opening, he doesn't seem to be watching for his opponents strategy.
- Okay this part is kind of weird, he sends all of his marines to kill an SCV after it had already gone through a xel'naga. Here's the picture
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/sDd1hl.jpg)
This is either a delayed reaction to seeing the SCV run by the first tower, or a map hack and Spades is just noticing the SCV late. I find it more likely that it's just a delayed reaction. If it was a map hack why wouldn't he put marines at his third to block the scout faster? Plus Spades doesn't even notice when it goes to the Xel'naga rather than his third base
- The scan is a little weird, but if I were scanning to see production, I probably would have scanned a little further to the right, thus seeing just as much stuff. It's hard to land a scan in Lucifron's base at this point and not see everything.
- When Lucifron's army is heading south, Spades doesn't notice in time to save his marine that was scouting
- Why would Spades scan Lucifron's army so much?
- During the actual engagements, Spades loses his army by Lucifron's third multiple times, not really knowing how much Lucifron is committing to breaking the contain there.
Tal'darim
- The camera locks over an SCV for a second which is kind of weird, but it's quite possible he looked at it for a second before giving minimap commands.
- He looks at the fog of war at 7:14 (again I'm unsure whether or not this completely rids him of guilt, since if he's using a camera lock shouldn't we never ever see this?).
- Scan at 9:30, again Lucifron makes it hard to not see everything with one scan.
- Spades doesn't even see Lucifron's marine coming to take xel'naga until it starts attacking him.
- @13:17 Spades again looks at fog of war.
- Moving his hellion to the watchtower at the exact moment of a push is kind of lucky, but you can see from rallying to his base that he's beginning to get concerned about a counter. To be honest when you have such a nice contain like that, it makes sense to be prepared for a counter.
- Why is he not more prepared for the initial doom drop to his main?
- Why is he not more prepared for the 20 min attack on third?
- Why not put vikings in better positioning to stop doom drops in the main? This seems like something someone would do who wasn't even map hacking
- @ 26 it is weird how he just decided that lucifron isn't going for his main anymore, but this turns out to be a bad decision later anyways as Lucifron attacks it again.
- The weirdest moment of the game is scanning just in time to see a doom drop at 33 minutes, but he still loses his third base to another attack that he should have known was coming.
- If he had known how spread out Lucifron was, why wouldn't he have dropped or harassed any of the bases?
All in all, I find it really hard to conclude that Spades was cheating. I never noticed any weird camera locking or sudden stops of him spamming to go look at something. To be honest, Spades makes so many mistakes that if he was map hacking, he'd have to be one of the worst players in the world to still mess up so badly.
The pro gamers in this thread are much more knowledgeable than me, you should obviously count their opinion as higher than my own. I just wanted to do a blind run through of the games without any prior bias and report on what I found. To be honest, I'm sort of baffled as to how the OP was able to watch the games and be so certain of map hacking in the first place.
Again, my opinion in no way reflects that of TeamLiquid or the rest of its staff.
I would also like to state again that I was watching for mistakes that a map hacker shouldn't have made rather then looking for proof that he was map hacking.
|
On June 06 2012 02:27 rei wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 02:22 -UMADIMSTYLIN- wrote:On June 06 2012 02:21 rei wrote:On June 06 2012 02:19 -UMADIMSTYLIN- wrote:On June 06 2012 02:17 rei wrote:On June 06 2012 02:14 -UMADIMSTYLIN- wrote:On June 06 2012 02:12 rei wrote:On June 06 2012 02:02 PainUser wrote: I'm not invested enough to give a point by point breakdown to convince people my opinion is correct. Thats my opinion and it isn't changing. Why did you voice your opinion if you are not going to invest in enough time to bring down spades' reputation? You already invested enough time to watch all 109 of his replays, even at 8x per replay it would take you at least 5 hour straight. Why not spend a 10th of that time write up a point by point argument supported with examples of suspicious actions. He just said why, he doesn't feel the need to covince people his opinion is correct! he said why he doesn't want to do the point by point, i ask why he even bother voice his opinion as in a baseless opinion is worthless, and he should not have voiced it, read better. ok sorry, relax guy! how do you know i'm a guy? why so presumptuous? Ok sorry, relax it ^_^ you better be sorry because you got owned. User was warned for this post
I said I was sorry
|
On June 06 2012 02:28 Benjamin99 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 02:21 Psychobabas wrote:On June 06 2012 02:17 Benjamin99 wrote:On June 06 2012 02:16 Psychobabas wrote:On June 06 2012 02:13 Mobsy wrote: Haha so funny, 6 or 7 pros now have said he hacked yet all you little kids still think you know the game better than the pros. Jesus, talk about the Dunning-Kruger effect! We are looking for solid numbers, not estimations and opinions. So you not even taking the top pro´s opinions in the NA scene into consideration, really? well then Its like trying to solve a murder case without the police then! Wrong analogy in my opinion. Not like that at all. Really? becuase the progamers are the police in this case they are the experts. Not wrong at all
Analogy is close enough to make the point. Police's job is to gather the evidence. Lawyer's job to present it. Jury's job to determine guilt.
Close enough.
|
Has the point that OP is using an alias been settled? sorry if it has been answered.
|
On June 06 2012 02:28 Benjamin99 wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 02:21 Psychobabas wrote:On June 06 2012 02:17 Benjamin99 wrote:On June 06 2012 02:16 Psychobabas wrote:On June 06 2012 02:13 Mobsy wrote: Haha so funny, 6 or 7 pros now have said he hacked yet all you little kids still think you know the game better than the pros. Jesus, talk about the Dunning-Kruger effect! We are looking for solid numbers, not estimations and opinions. So you not even taking the top pro´s opinions in the NA scene into consideration, really? well then Its like trying to solve a murder case without the police then! Wrong analogy in my opinion. Not like that at all. Really? becuase the progamers are the police in this case they are the experts. Not wrong at all Pfft, police officers aren't experts. Not by a long shot.
Not here in the US anyways.
|
United States10774 Posts
On June 06 2012 02:28 Defacer wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 02:15 Benjamin99 wrote:On June 06 2012 02:13 Mobsy wrote: Haha so funny, 6 or 7 pros now have said he hacked yet all you little kids still think you know the game better than the pros. Jesus, talk about the Dunning-Kruger effect! QFT its mindblowing people are still arguing about this. Its so obvious he cheated but I geuss people like to argue! People just want hard evidence, not 'expert analysis'. It's a serious, career ending accusation. I remember in the Trayvon Martin thread, daPhreak mentioning you should always take expert analysis with a grain of salt. It's impossible for anyone to be 100% objective about any issue, and if you look hard enough, you can find an expert to support any position you take. If Spades really does hack, some kind of hard, technical proof shouldn't be to hard to find. Until then, I'm reserving judgement. And I think a lot of criticism has nothing to do with Spades, but how his situation was handled by TL. If this is how all accusations of hacking are going to be handled in the future, I can't imagine TL being a very pleasant community. :/ I doubt there will be hard, irrefutable technical evidence. That is a bold assumption. Hackers don't leave clear trails now like they used to in BW. The hacking programs are designed to rid the hard evidence.
|
On June 06 2012 02:30 SolidMustard wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 02:27 rei wrote:On June 06 2012 02:22 -UMADIMSTYLIN- wrote:On June 06 2012 02:21 rei wrote:On June 06 2012 02:19 -UMADIMSTYLIN- wrote:On June 06 2012 02:17 rei wrote:On June 06 2012 02:14 -UMADIMSTYLIN- wrote:On June 06 2012 02:12 rei wrote:On June 06 2012 02:02 PainUser wrote: I'm not invested enough to give a point by point breakdown to convince people my opinion is correct. Thats my opinion and it isn't changing. Why did you voice your opinion if you are not going to invest in enough time to bring down spades' reputation? You already invested enough time to watch all 109 of his replays, even at 8x per replay it would take you at least 5 hour straight. Why not spend a 10th of that time write up a point by point argument supported with examples of suspicious actions. He just said why, he doesn't feel the need to covince people his opinion is correct! he said why he doesn't want to do the point by point, i ask why he even bother voice his opinion as in a baseless opinion is worthless, and he should not have voiced it, read better. ok sorry, relax guy! how do you know i'm a guy? why so presumptuous? Ok sorry, relax it ^_^ you better be sorry because you got owned. And YOU come out as a douche, for sure, guy or not I deserved that warning. and he's right i'm trolling and i'm a guy lol
|
On June 06 2012 02:15 rei wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 02:10 Felnarion wrote: Something interesting for me is that, if it were me being accused, I would be in this thread, quoting every post, and explaining my reasoning. I would be screaming if I were being thrown to the wolves like this. Instead we have what, one post from him explaining a handful of moves poorly and dismissively, Nope, he posted 109 replays of himself which proved he didn't hack at all. get owned.
Actually the replays just showed how he normally uses his camera, if anything they proved he was hacking even more.
Unless ofcourse him preparing for a match means making stupid decisions constantly and controlling his camera like he's bronze.
|
On June 06 2012 02:30 confusedcrib wrote:First off I want to say that my opinion is in no way reflective of the rest of Team Liquid's or its staff. I went through three of the games but I wanted to do things a little bit differently than everyone else. I've tried to stay out of this to see if anyone can say anything conclusive, but so far it looks like very little has been changed. First of all, I went backwards through the games, thinking that the odds are that, if hacking, he would get lazier over time at covering up (although there seems to be more evidence in earlier games for whatever reason?). Another good reason to do this is that I imagine most of the analysis time has been spent on the earlier replays. Second, rather than focus only on lucky coincidences, I focused on big mistakes that, if map hacking, a pro player should have never made. Here are my results: Shattered Temple- Spades let's Lucifron's hellion poke all of the way up his ramp rather than pre spreading marines at the choke (something most players do anyways)
- Spades doesn't really react to Lucifron's air build, not getting a reactor starport and skimping on vikings,
- Spades was really sloppy with the execution of his first push. He almost lost his raven and took plenty of free tank shots
- At one point Spades looks into the fog of war, I'm confused about whether or not this debunks the thing entirely, as if he had a mod shouldn't we not ever see him do that?
- He loses an entire dropship without ever reacting
- He's not prepared for Lucifron's low ground tank attack, it seems to catch Spades completely off guard
- At one point Lucifron drops a tank onto the highground in the middle of the map, why wouldn't Spades move his tanks back faster? Technically if he was using a map hack he would have seen it right away anyways since he happened to be looking there.
Daybreak- Spades seems to spam a lot when opening, he doesn't seem to be watching for his opponents strategy.
- Okay this part is kind of weird, he sends all of his marines to kill an SCV after it had already gone through a xel'naga. Here's the picture
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/sDd1hl.jpg)
This is either a delayed reaction to seeing the SCV run by the first tower, or a map hack and Spades is just noticing the SCV late. I find it more likely that it's just a delayed reaction. If it was a map hack why wouldn't he put marines at his third to block the scout faster? Plus Spades doesn't even notice when it goes to the Xel'naga rather than his third base
- The scan is a little weird, but if I were scanning to see production, I probably would have scanned a little further to the right, thus seeing just as much stuff. It's hard to land a scan in Lucifron's base at this point and not see everything.
- When Lucifron's army is heading south, Spades doesn't notice in time to save his marine that was scouting
- Why would Spades scan Lucifron's army so much?
- During the actual engagements, Spades loses his army by Lucifron's third multiple times, not really knowing how much Lucifron is committing to breaking the contain there.
Tal'darim- The camera locks over an SCV for a second which is kind of weird, but it's quite possible he looked at it for a second before giving minimap commands.
- He looks at the fog of war at 7:14 (again I'm unsure whether or not this completely rids him of guilt, since if he's using a camera lock shouldn't we never ever see this?).
- Scan at 9:30, again Lucifron makes it hard to not see everything with one scan.
- Spades doesn't even see Lucifron's marine coming to take xel'naga until it starts attacking him.
- @13:17 Spades again looks at fog of war.
- Moving his hellion to the watchtower at the exact moment of a push is kind of lucky, but you can see from rallying to his base that he's beginning to get concerned about a counter. To be honest when you have such a nice contain like that, it makes sense to be prepared for a counter.
- Why is he not more prepared for the initial doom drop to his main?
- Why is he not more prepared for the 20 min attack on third?
- Why not put vikings in better positioning to stop doom drops in the main? This seems like something someone would do who wasn't even map hacking
- @ 26 it is weird how he just decided that lucifron isn't going for his main anymore, but this turns out to be a bad decision later anyways as Lucifron attacks it again.
- The weirdest moment of the game is scanning just in time to see a doom drop at 33 minutes, but he still loses his third base to another attack that he should have known was coming.
- If he had known how spread out Lucifron was, why wouldn't he have dropped or harassed any of the bases?
All in all, I find it really hard to conclude that Spades was cheating. I never noticed any weird camera locking or sudden stops of him spamming to go look at something. To be honest, Spades makes so many mistakes that if he was map hacking, he'd have to be one of the worst players in the world to still mess up so badly. The pro gamers in this thread are much more knowledgeable than me, you should obviously count their opinion as higher than my own. I just wanted to do a blind run through of the games without any prior bias and report on what I found. To be honest, I'm sort of baffled as to how the OP was able to watch the games and be so certain of map hacking in the first place. Again, my opinion in no way reflects that of TeamLiquid or the rest of its staff.
While I appreciate the benefit of the doubt here, you didn't look at the most telling game (in my mind) which is Antiga. His movements are difficult to justify without a map hack.
Or the game where he scans cross spawn, perfectly, to see production, marine placement, and a third CC on a map that is not forced cross (which he knows, he sent his SCV to the bottom first.
|
On June 06 2012 02:07 SCII-ALI wrote:why are you linking this? this has nothing to do with the situation about Spades.
I know, just remembered the good times :D
Clazzi was later found cheating, funny stuff
|
The closest thing to that method in my opinion would be the lack of FOW screens via left click, since someone earlier linked one of the functions of the abovementioned hacks was screen lock and automated unlock when you right click to issue a command.
Now, not that I know much about the hack myself, but it would be logical to assume you can toggle the screen lock on/off manually. However, whether or not the lock can be set to being automatically turned on when you click into the fog is another matter (I am not 100% sure about this auto feature) - if the hacker sets it to auto right from the beginning, then its most likely there will be no FOW left clicks - which is what seems to be the case in the showmatches.
I'm not saying Spades hacked for sure, but I'm leaning towards it from this fact alone, along with the comparison of his other replays and VOD (where he left clicks into FOW); Assuming that the hack can be set to auto
There is no way to prove someone is hacking short off blizzards Warden detecting it (which by now most would know isn't 100% fullproof), the person admitting it verbally, or by streaming with hacks. If those were the only ways (except blizz), people would blatantly look into fog because "hey, they can't prove shit!".
|
On June 06 2012 02:31 Antylamon wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 02:28 Benjamin99 wrote:On June 06 2012 02:21 Psychobabas wrote:On June 06 2012 02:17 Benjamin99 wrote:On June 06 2012 02:16 Psychobabas wrote:On June 06 2012 02:13 Mobsy wrote: Haha so funny, 6 or 7 pros now have said he hacked yet all you little kids still think you know the game better than the pros. Jesus, talk about the Dunning-Kruger effect! We are looking for solid numbers, not estimations and opinions. So you not even taking the top pro´s opinions in the NA scene into consideration, really? well then Its like trying to solve a murder case without the police then! Wrong analogy in my opinion. Not like that at all. Really? becuase the progamers are the police in this case they are the experts. Not wrong at all Pfft, police officers aren't experts. Not by a long shot. Not here in the US anyways.
Im sure in the US you got special departments in the FBI who are experts in different areas. And when a case arives who needs there expertice they will get involved. So yea I say my analogy are correct. Irs very important to listen to what the progamers are saying
|
On June 06 2012 02:25 Chargelot wrote:Show nested quote +On June 06 2012 02:21 zerglingrodeo wrote:On June 06 2012 02:17 rei wrote:On June 06 2012 02:14 -UMADIMSTYLIN- wrote:On June 06 2012 02:12 rei wrote:On June 06 2012 02:02 PainUser wrote: I'm not invested enough to give a point by point breakdown to convince people my opinion is correct. Thats my opinion and it isn't changing. Why did you voice your opinion if you are not going to invest in enough time to bring down spades' reputation? You already invested enough time to watch all 109 of his replays, even at 8x per replay it would take you at least 5 hour straight. Why not spend a 10th of that time write up a point by point argument supported with examples of suspicious actions. He just said why, he doesn't feel the need to covince people his opinion is correct! he said why he doesn't want to do the point by point, i ask why he even bother voice his opinion as in a baseless opinion is worthless, and he should not have voiced it, read better. Eh, it is not totally worthless for a pro to come out and say "this is my honest opinion after careful review." Presumably they are good at forming opinions of this kind. You don't ask your doctor to go through his entire personal reasoning process when he comes in and tells you his diagnosis. I demand my doctor's reasoning process. I don't want to know how his brain works, but I do demand that he tells me why and/or how based on his analysis of my injury/illness (If applicable. Obviously broken bones are obvious). If you leave with nothing else, take this advice: Ask your doctors questions. This is all completely unrelated, but at least if you ask more questions when examined by your doctors, something good will have come out of this thread.
Of course I ask my doctors questions. It is great to get more information about one's health and body. That is not my point. My point is that an honest opinion from a qualified person can have value even without explanation.
|
Tbh guys, If you can't trust a pro's in-depth opinion about this.. See Illusions post and CatZ stream session with 3 other pros. Then there is really nothing else to see hear, I'm not going to base my opinion on some diamond league players thoughts that are totally baseless or have been refuted by said pros. This is becoming a never ending cycle that is quite sad.. You don't ask an eye doctor to look at your ears, and you don't ask a ear doctor to look at your eyes. You ask the proffesionals of said profession what their in-depth opinions are and that trumps all other opinions. Sorry but if you can't even get GM then you probably have no idea what intricacies and little details to look for when spotting a veteran hacker, So please just keep quiet until other PROFESSIONALS voice their opinions, most of the people in this thread are just clueless. Simple as that.
|
|
|
|