• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 09:12
CET 15:12
KST 23:12
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10
Community News
RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket8Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge1[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation14Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada4SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA12
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview Mech is the composition that needs teleportation t GM / Master map hacker and general hacking and cheating thread
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 3 $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest 2025 RSL Offline Finals Dates + Ticket Sales! Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 500 Fright night Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened
Brood War
General
FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle Data analysis on 70 million replays soO on: FanTaSy's Potential Return to StarCraft [ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] GosuLeague T1 Ro16 - Tue & Thu 22:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Tie Breaker - Group B - Sun 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Tie Breaker - Group A - Sat 21:00 CET
Strategy
Current Meta How to stay on top of macro? PvZ map balance Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile [Game] Osu! Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Clair Obscur - Expedition 33 Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI About SC2SEA.COM
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Dyadica Evangelium — Chapt…
Hildegard
Coffee x Performance in Espo…
TrAiDoS
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2009 users

MLG Winter Arena to be PPV - Page 167

Forum Index > SC2 General
4945 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 165 166 167 168 169 248 Next
Criticism is allowed. Undue flaming is not. Take a second to think your post through before you submit.

Bans will be handed out.

Should go without saying, but don't link restreams here either.
Meta
Profile Blog Joined June 2003
United States6225 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-15 05:47:41
February 15 2012 05:43 GMT
#3321
As someone who has, to this day, NEVER paid for ANY content from Korea, where all the actual best players are and where the best games are played, there is absolutely no chance I will pay for this content.

I want esports to be big and all, but the burden of monetizing shouldn't be on the fans.

I should add that I still watch the GSL, live, for free, almost every night. It's worth it for me to live by crazy ridiculous hours to see it, but not worth the money to watch it at any time.

Also, I feel so, so sorry for you gold membership buyers. I mean, it's your money, so if it's really worth that much to you, go for it. I would feel cheated.
good vibes only
Shaok
Profile Joined October 2010
297 Posts
February 15 2012 05:45 GMT
#3322
It's a separate event from MLG championship season IIRC. There is no reason to think you were granted access when purchasing Gold Member status.
Ice Climber
Profile Joined January 2012
United States46 Posts
February 15 2012 05:49 GMT
#3323
My two cents:

Money isn't a problem for myself, but $20.00 is too much to charge for a single weekend for the vast majority of people. I really doubt that will be the final price point.

I'm interested in seeing how well this does.

I'm probably going to end up paying for it myself with or without a price drop, but only because the player list is so stacked.

Assembly just does not have the same caliber of players showing up.
OuchyDathurts
Profile Joined September 2010
United States4588 Posts
February 15 2012 05:49 GMT
#3324
Some random thoughts on the whole situation. Maybe they're silly but maybe they're worth consideration. I'd email them in to MLG as food for thought but I'm not entirely sure where to send them.

What about charging in an a la carte method for those who can't catch the whole weekend? (Numbers are made up, can be changed around obviously) What if they charged say $5 a day and $10 for all 3? If you could only sit down and watch the sunday championship games then you throw down $5 and can still catch your games. Theoretically that's still more money in their pockets than they would get from someone that could only watch a day or 2 and just said "f it".

What about monetizing through barcrafts? Make it a completely opt in situation so some of the smaller "mom and pop" style barcrafts can just pay the $20 and watch their games. But maybe have a "barcraft package" where a larger barcraft can buy in for say $200 (made up, but bars do have to pay a LOT more for PPV packages than the normal consumer in general). For that price maybe MLG sends them a little swag bag for the barcraft to raffle off or whatever. A few T shirts, a sweatshirt, mousepads, whatever. Maybe they throw to a live webcam during a break as well to give them props. Obviously the price point would need to be at a place where MLG makes a profit after giving the barcraft stuff, but still not so much where the barcraft would feel screwed.

I dunno, to me, on paper at least, it seems like those are a few avenues that haven't been looked at that could do well.
LiquidDota Staff
aristarchus
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States652 Posts
February 15 2012 05:53 GMT
#3325
On February 15 2012 14:45 Shaok wrote:
It's a separate event from MLG championship season IIRC. There is no reason to think you were granted access when purchasing Gold Member status.

I've seen a bunch of quotes posted from MLG advertising that, while not perfectly clear or straightforward, definitely did provide some reason to think this would be included. It was, for example, stated that you'd get access to "pro circuit events", and this is a pro circuit event by most reasonable definitions. I think if MLG said "We always had 6 events before, but now this year we're having 1, and we're going to have 5 other events and call them 'MLG super tournaments' and you don't get access to any of that" I think a lot of people would be mad, for an obvious reason. Even if it has a different name, they're taking stuff people would think is part of what is included and pulling it out.

(I don't have a gold pass and have no stake in this fight - just don't like seeing this sort of fishy stuff.)
VirgilSC2
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States6151 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-15 05:56:48
February 15 2012 05:55 GMT
#3326
I think it's pretty pathetic that MLG wrote a "Questions about the MLG Winter Arena and PPV?" thread, and yet continue to ignore serious questions in it.

EDIT:

On February 15 2012 14:45 Shaok wrote:
It's a separate event from MLG championship season IIRC. There is no reason to think you were granted access when purchasing Gold Member status.


The MLG Gold Membership (prior to the change) stated "Access to HQ Live Pro Circuit Broadcasts"

MLG Winter Arena is being marketed as a Pro Circuit event.

Pretty straightforward way of thinking it WOULD be included.
Clarity Gaming #1 Fan | Avid MTG Grinder | @VirgilSC2
tdt
Profile Joined October 2010
United States3179 Posts
February 15 2012 05:55 GMT
#3327
On February 15 2012 14:49 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Some random thoughts on the whole situation. Maybe they're silly but maybe they're worth consideration. I'd email them in to MLG as food for thought but I'm not entirely sure where to send them.

What about charging in an a la carte method for those who can't catch the whole weekend? (Numbers are made up, can be changed around obviously) What if they charged say $5 a day and $10 for all 3? If you could only sit down and watch the sunday championship games then you throw down $5 and can still catch your games. Theoretically that's still more money in their pockets than they would get from someone that could only watch a day or 2 and just said "f it".

What about monetizing through barcrafts? Make it a completely opt in situation so some of the smaller "mom and pop" style barcrafts can just pay the $20 and watch their games. But maybe have a "barcraft package" where a larger barcraft can buy in for say $200 (made up, but bars do have to pay a LOT more for PPV packages than the normal consumer in general). For that price maybe MLG sends them a little swag bag for the barcraft to raffle off or whatever. A few T shirts, a sweatshirt, mousepads, whatever. Maybe they throw to a live webcam during a break as well to give them props. Obviously the price point would need to be at a place where MLG makes a profit after giving the barcraft stuff, but still not so much where the barcraft would feel screwed.

I dunno, to me, on paper at least, it seems like those are a few avenues that haven't been looked at that could do well.

All these ideas about monitizing are complete bullshit until you have a killer app. For example, Back when Zuffa bought UFC they sunk 80 million into it to make it a must watch before they turned a dime. Before that they got 4000PPV and were bankrupt.. Yes, takes money to make money and innovation too. That's where places like GSL and HSC come in. GSL has the best. HSC lets you get up close and personal. What is MLG? just another ordinarily FREE tournament who invites players and pays a rather paltry sum. No Thanks.
MC for president
OuchyDathurts
Profile Joined September 2010
United States4588 Posts
February 15 2012 06:01 GMT
#3328
On February 15 2012 14:55 tdt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 15 2012 14:49 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Some random thoughts on the whole situation. Maybe they're silly but maybe they're worth consideration. I'd email them in to MLG as food for thought but I'm not entirely sure where to send them.

What about charging in an a la carte method for those who can't catch the whole weekend? (Numbers are made up, can be changed around obviously) What if they charged say $5 a day and $10 for all 3? If you could only sit down and watch the sunday championship games then you throw down $5 and can still catch your games. Theoretically that's still more money in their pockets than they would get from someone that could only watch a day or 2 and just said "f it".

What about monetizing through barcrafts? Make it a completely opt in situation so some of the smaller "mom and pop" style barcrafts can just pay the $20 and watch their games. But maybe have a "barcraft package" where a larger barcraft can buy in for say $200 (made up, but bars do have to pay a LOT more for PPV packages than the normal consumer in general). For that price maybe MLG sends them a little swag bag for the barcraft to raffle off or whatever. A few T shirts, a sweatshirt, mousepads, whatever. Maybe they throw to a live webcam during a break as well to give them props. Obviously the price point would need to be at a place where MLG makes a profit after giving the barcraft stuff, but still not so much where the barcraft would feel screwed.

I dunno, to me, on paper at least, it seems like those are a few avenues that haven't been looked at that could do well.

All these ideas about monitizing are complete bullshit until you have a killer app. For example, Back when Zuffa bought UFC they sunk 80 million into it to make it a must watch before they turned a dime. Before that they got 4000PPV and were bankrupt.. Yes, takes money to make money and innovation too. That's where places like GSL and HSC come in. GSL has the best. HSC lets you get up close and personal. What is MLG? just another ordinarily FREE tournament who invites players and pays a rather paltry sum. No Thanks.


I'm aware of Zuffas beginnings. I believe I was the first to bring them up in one of these threads. The fact of the matter is MLG has decided to go with charging people. I understand their need to charge so they don't go under. I don't believe they went about it in quite the right manner. I also don't believe they explored all the possibilities and the $20 price point was setting the bar too high. I agree with Alex Garfield that $10 would have been the smart money. I also believe something like my second suggestion (which is completely optional) would have been a way to provide them a little revenue without all the backlash.

If the people behind MLG have any sense (and other tourney organizers for that matter) they'll be combing through all these threads to learn from this "mistake". I'm merely throwing out ideas.
LiquidDota Staff
tdt
Profile Joined October 2010
United States3179 Posts
February 15 2012 06:17 GMT
#3329
On February 15 2012 15:01 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 15 2012 14:55 tdt wrote:
On February 15 2012 14:49 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Some random thoughts on the whole situation. Maybe they're silly but maybe they're worth consideration. I'd email them in to MLG as food for thought but I'm not entirely sure where to send them.

What about charging in an a la carte method for those who can't catch the whole weekend? (Numbers are made up, can be changed around obviously) What if they charged say $5 a day and $10 for all 3? If you could only sit down and watch the sunday championship games then you throw down $5 and can still catch your games. Theoretically that's still more money in their pockets than they would get from someone that could only watch a day or 2 and just said "f it".

What about monetizing through barcrafts? Make it a completely opt in situation so some of the smaller "mom and pop" style barcrafts can just pay the $20 and watch their games. But maybe have a "barcraft package" where a larger barcraft can buy in for say $200 (made up, but bars do have to pay a LOT more for PPV packages than the normal consumer in general). For that price maybe MLG sends them a little swag bag for the barcraft to raffle off or whatever. A few T shirts, a sweatshirt, mousepads, whatever. Maybe they throw to a live webcam during a break as well to give them props. Obviously the price point would need to be at a place where MLG makes a profit after giving the barcraft stuff, but still not so much where the barcraft would feel screwed.

I dunno, to me, on paper at least, it seems like those are a few avenues that haven't been looked at that could do well.

All these ideas about monitizing are complete bullshit until you have a killer app. For example, Back when Zuffa bought UFC they sunk 80 million into it to make it a must watch before they turned a dime. Before that they got 4000PPV and were bankrupt.. Yes, takes money to make money and innovation too. That's where places like GSL and HSC come in. GSL has the best. HSC lets you get up close and personal. What is MLG? just another ordinarily FREE tournament who invites players and pays a rather paltry sum. No Thanks.


I'm aware of Zuffas beginnings. I believe I was the first to bring them up in one of these threads. The fact of the matter is MLG has decided to go with charging people. I understand their need to charge so they don't go under. I don't believe they went about it in quite the right manner. I also don't believe they explored all the possibilities and the $20 price point was setting the bar too high. I agree with Alex Garfield that $10 would have been the smart money. I also believe something like my second suggestion (which is completely optional) would have been a way to provide them a little revenue without all the backlash.

If the people behind MLG have any sense (and other tourney organizers for that matter) they'll be combing through all these threads to learn from this "mistake". I'm merely throwing out ideas.


I don't know if $10 is smart but certainly putting the cost less than the premier tournament (GSL) instead of above it couldn't hurt. But I still stand by my comment that you need a killer app to ask for money when there are plenty of FREE alternatives. People make purchases on relative value, not charity ("supporting esports" canard).
MC for president
foxmulder_ms
Profile Joined February 2011
United States140 Posts
February 15 2012 06:22 GMT
#3330
MLG people are out of their mind. If they think they can even have 5% of their viewership, they are dreaming. Forget about the community response, I wonder the reaction from sponsors of the teams and MLG. Nw, you will have at max 2000 views. Have happy little local LAN tournament down there....
Ricemagical
Profile Joined November 2010
270 Posts
February 15 2012 06:30 GMT
#3331
On February 15 2012 14:49 Ice Climber wrote:
My two cents:

Money isn't a problem for myself, but $20.00 is too much to charge for a single weekend for the vast majority of people. I really doubt that will be the final price point.

I'm interested in seeing how well this does.

I'm probably going to end up paying for it myself with or without a price drop, but only because the player list is so stacked.

Assembly just does not have the same caliber of players showing up.

Lol and how do you suppose they'll go about resetting the price? They'd have to refund a portion of the purchase made by all people who have already paid for the pass.
OuchyDathurts
Profile Joined September 2010
United States4588 Posts
February 15 2012 06:32 GMT
#3332
On February 15 2012 15:17 tdt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 15 2012 15:01 OuchyDathurts wrote:
On February 15 2012 14:55 tdt wrote:
On February 15 2012 14:49 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Some random thoughts on the whole situation. Maybe they're silly but maybe they're worth consideration. I'd email them in to MLG as food for thought but I'm not entirely sure where to send them.

What about charging in an a la carte method for those who can't catch the whole weekend? (Numbers are made up, can be changed around obviously) What if they charged say $5 a day and $10 for all 3? If you could only sit down and watch the sunday championship games then you throw down $5 and can still catch your games. Theoretically that's still more money in their pockets than they would get from someone that could only watch a day or 2 and just said "f it".

What about monetizing through barcrafts? Make it a completely opt in situation so some of the smaller "mom and pop" style barcrafts can just pay the $20 and watch their games. But maybe have a "barcraft package" where a larger barcraft can buy in for say $200 (made up, but bars do have to pay a LOT more for PPV packages than the normal consumer in general). For that price maybe MLG sends them a little swag bag for the barcraft to raffle off or whatever. A few T shirts, a sweatshirt, mousepads, whatever. Maybe they throw to a live webcam during a break as well to give them props. Obviously the price point would need to be at a place where MLG makes a profit after giving the barcraft stuff, but still not so much where the barcraft would feel screwed.

I dunno, to me, on paper at least, it seems like those are a few avenues that haven't been looked at that could do well.

All these ideas about monitizing are complete bullshit until you have a killer app. For example, Back when Zuffa bought UFC they sunk 80 million into it to make it a must watch before they turned a dime. Before that they got 4000PPV and were bankrupt.. Yes, takes money to make money and innovation too. That's where places like GSL and HSC come in. GSL has the best. HSC lets you get up close and personal. What is MLG? just another ordinarily FREE tournament who invites players and pays a rather paltry sum. No Thanks.


I'm aware of Zuffas beginnings. I believe I was the first to bring them up in one of these threads. The fact of the matter is MLG has decided to go with charging people. I understand their need to charge so they don't go under. I don't believe they went about it in quite the right manner. I also don't believe they explored all the possibilities and the $20 price point was setting the bar too high. I agree with Alex Garfield that $10 would have been the smart money. I also believe something like my second suggestion (which is completely optional) would have been a way to provide them a little revenue without all the backlash.

If the people behind MLG have any sense (and other tourney organizers for that matter) they'll be combing through all these threads to learn from this "mistake". I'm merely throwing out ideas.


I don't know if $10 is smart but certainly putting the cost less than the premier tournament (GSL) instead of above it couldn't hurt. But I still stand by my comment that you need a killer app to ask for money when there are plenty of FREE alternatives. People make purchases on relative value, not charity ("supporting esports" canard).


Well if they were deadset on charging $10 could be a whole lot less staggering to the community. I have no proof obviously, but I'm personally convinced they'd get over twice as many subs at $10 than they will at $20. It would have been wiser IMO for them to let the first event of the year be a free "proof of concept". Let people see what they can expect, then charge at the next event so people aren't completely in the dark as to what they're going to get for their money. Charging for things to be the same as they were in 2011 is silly, I'm sure they're going to try and iron out things. They've always improved with each MLG in 2011.

MLG does give you a decent product. I'll admit I've never caught the IPL championships, only a bit of HSC, a few GSL games (but GOM player hates me so I can't watch it). But I think MLG has the best announcers, they try and get koreans in to help legitimize it as not just a tier 2 tourney. They're on a better timeslot in the US which is nice compared to GSL. But the downtime between games can be unprofessionally long, pauses during a game to sort things out, things of that nature are big strikes against them. In 2011 it was decent, I overall enjoyed things, but decent doesn't necessarily warrant money. I'd like to see them succeed but time will tell.

They've claimed they're running at a net loss so they can't tread water forever. I'm skeptical about everything but I want to hope the best. I don't want this to be a money grab with no conscience behind it. I don't want sundance in the MLG crew to fold. I like (not love) most of what they do. So I just wanted to toss out some ideas that maybe they hadn't thought about (or other tourney organizers).
LiquidDota Staff
coolcor
Profile Joined February 2011
520 Posts
February 15 2012 06:33 GMT
#3333
On February 15 2012 15:30 Ricemagical wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 15 2012 14:49 Ice Climber wrote:
My two cents:

Money isn't a problem for myself, but $20.00 is too much to charge for a single weekend for the vast majority of people. I really doubt that will be the final price point.

I'm interested in seeing how well this does.

I'm probably going to end up paying for it myself with or without a price drop, but only because the player list is so stacked.

Assembly just does not have the same caliber of players showing up.

Lol and how do you suppose they'll go about resetting the price? They'd have to refund a portion of the purchase made by all people who have already paid for the pass.


Just do exactly what GOM did when they dropped the price from 50 to 20 before the first season. Give the people who already bought a ticket to the next one.
starcraftred
Profile Joined February 2012
Canada12 Posts
February 15 2012 06:35 GMT
#3334
Hi, I don't think PPV will work for SC2 like other sports like UFC.
Because you can see these same players playing tournaments elsewhere for free and often.
I only see it working if say there was contracts where you see certain players only in MLG maybe ala kespa type thing but even that wouldn't make much sense because frankly SC2 two years later is still volatile in nature.
Oh and UFC still has free type of shows on television so PPV by itself obvoiusly doesn't cut it... only way I can see it work is if mlg live event production is super high end aka BW proleague level and very hype.
quoting dead people makes me feel smart
NoBigDeal
Profile Joined September 2011
United States15 Posts
February 15 2012 06:50 GMT
#3335
On February 14 2012 16:50 Tachion wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]


This is hilarious.
choas
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
Canada23 Posts
February 15 2012 06:59 GMT
#3336
my two cents on this is that $20 is fair but i have a issue with this being a gold member i was told when i got my pass that i would get to view all of the MLG tournaments and game play. this dose not seem to be the case unless i pay another 20 dollars. i don't see why they didn't say something sooner or at least grandfather gold member's in or something just seems to be a slap in the face. am really looking forward too the lo3 tomorrow too hear what MLG and sundance has to say about it. depending on what he says i may never watch another MLG again. although i do have a question is there anyway a gold member could take legal action against MLG for what they did with the gold memberships and with adding the new arena, seeing as the gold membership was too cover everything? just a question is all. i hope MLG can fix this and put it be-hide them i hope they learn from it too.
human_ko
Profile Joined July 2010
Russian Federation676 Posts
February 15 2012 07:01 GMT
#3337
I wish I knew what PPV meant lol....
WOrd, yo.
tdt
Profile Joined October 2010
United States3179 Posts
February 15 2012 07:02 GMT
#3338
On February 15 2012 15:32 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 15 2012 15:17 tdt wrote:
On February 15 2012 15:01 OuchyDathurts wrote:
On February 15 2012 14:55 tdt wrote:
On February 15 2012 14:49 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Some random thoughts on the whole situation. Maybe they're silly but maybe they're worth consideration. I'd email them in to MLG as food for thought but I'm not entirely sure where to send them.

What about charging in an a la carte method for those who can't catch the whole weekend? (Numbers are made up, can be changed around obviously) What if they charged say $5 a day and $10 for all 3? If you could only sit down and watch the sunday championship games then you throw down $5 and can still catch your games. Theoretically that's still more money in their pockets than they would get from someone that could only watch a day or 2 and just said "f it".

What about monetizing through barcrafts? Make it a completely opt in situation so some of the smaller "mom and pop" style barcrafts can just pay the $20 and watch their games. But maybe have a "barcraft package" where a larger barcraft can buy in for say $200 (made up, but bars do have to pay a LOT more for PPV packages than the normal consumer in general). For that price maybe MLG sends them a little swag bag for the barcraft to raffle off or whatever. A few T shirts, a sweatshirt, mousepads, whatever. Maybe they throw to a live webcam during a break as well to give them props. Obviously the price point would need to be at a place where MLG makes a profit after giving the barcraft stuff, but still not so much where the barcraft would feel screwed.

I dunno, to me, on paper at least, it seems like those are a few avenues that haven't been looked at that could do well.

All these ideas about monitizing are complete bullshit until you have a killer app. For example, Back when Zuffa bought UFC they sunk 80 million into it to make it a must watch before they turned a dime. Before that they got 4000PPV and were bankrupt.. Yes, takes money to make money and innovation too. That's where places like GSL and HSC come in. GSL has the best. HSC lets you get up close and personal. What is MLG? just another ordinarily FREE tournament who invites players and pays a rather paltry sum. No Thanks.


I'm aware of Zuffas beginnings. I believe I was the first to bring them up in one of these threads. The fact of the matter is MLG has decided to go with charging people. I understand their need to charge so they don't go under. I don't believe they went about it in quite the right manner. I also don't believe they explored all the possibilities and the $20 price point was setting the bar too high. I agree with Alex Garfield that $10 would have been the smart money. I also believe something like my second suggestion (which is completely optional) would have been a way to provide them a little revenue without all the backlash.

If the people behind MLG have any sense (and other tourney organizers for that matter) they'll be combing through all these threads to learn from this "mistake". I'm merely throwing out ideas.


I don't know if $10 is smart but certainly putting the cost less than the premier tournament (GSL) instead of above it couldn't hurt. But I still stand by my comment that you need a killer app to ask for money when there are plenty of FREE alternatives. People make purchases on relative value, not charity ("supporting esports" canard).


Well if they were deadset on charging $10 could be a whole lot less staggering to the community. I have no proof obviously, but I'm personally convinced they'd get over twice as many subs at $10 than they will at $20. It would have been wiser IMO for them to let the first event of the year be a free "proof of concept". Let people see what they can expect, then charge at the next event so people aren't completely in the dark as to what they're going to get for their money. Charging for things to be the same as they were in 2011 is silly, I'm sure they're going to try and iron out things. They've always improved with each MLG in 2011.

MLG does give you a decent product. I'll admit I've never caught the IPL championships, only a bit of HSC, a few GSL games (but GOM player hates me so I can't watch it). But I think MLG has the best announcers, they try and get koreans in to help legitimize it as not just a tier 2 tourney. They're on a better timeslot in the US which is nice compared to GSL. But the downtime between games can be unprofessionally long, pauses during a game to sort things out, things of that nature are big strikes against them. In 2011 it was decent, I overall enjoyed things, but decent doesn't necessarily warrant money. I'd like to see them succeed but time will tell.

They've claimed they're running at a net loss so they can't tread water forever. I'm skeptical about everything but I want to hope the best. I don't want this to be a money grab with no conscience behind it. I don't want sundance in the MLG crew to fold. I like (not love) most of what they do. So I just wanted to toss out some ideas that maybe they hadn't thought about (or other tourney organizers).


I agree with your sentiments and predictions in general. I have no problem with a money grab either if market warrants it. Good businessman should get paid large and do because they give you something worth it. Obviously, from the majority of responses in this thread MLG is not yet there.
MC for president
Boblhead
Profile Joined August 2010
United States2577 Posts
February 15 2012 07:04 GMT
#3339
On February 15 2012 16:01 human_ko wrote:
I wish I knew what PPV meant lol....

Pay Per View, is usually limited to movies that just came out on DvD, Porn through your TV, Special sporting events Boxing/UFC/Cricket/soccer/etc.
tdt
Profile Joined October 2010
United States3179 Posts
February 15 2012 07:05 GMT
#3340
On February 15 2012 16:01 human_ko wrote:
I wish I knew what PPV meant lol....

You PAY PER VIEW (PPV). As in if you want to see event you pay for it. It's a revenue generator for many events in the west.
MC for president
Prev 1 165 166 167 168 169 248 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
13:00
King of the Hill #231
SteadfastSC125
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko513
RotterdaM 205
SteadfastSC 125
LamboSC2 19
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 52199
Calm 4314
Rain 3211
Sea 2036
Soulkey 1202
firebathero 643
Larva 547
Mini 545
Zeus 462
EffOrt 398
[ Show more ]
Snow 290
PianO 275
BeSt 269
Soma 178
ZerO 146
Light 145
JYJ138
Pusan 100
hero 88
Rush 85
Hyun 70
Backho 53
yabsab 45
ToSsGirL 34
Movie 34
soO 31
Aegong 29
Terrorterran 28
scan(afreeca) 19
Shine 18
HiyA 13
ivOry 6
Dota 2
Gorgc4664
singsing2211
qojqva1754
Dendi644
XcaliburYe138
League of Legends
KnowMe21
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1985
allub101
Heroes of the Storm
Trikslyr22
Other Games
B2W.Neo1428
hiko498
crisheroes469
Mew2King119
ArmadaUGS98
oskar64
nookyyy 32
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream17671
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 1696
StarCraft 2
ComeBackTV 571
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 5
• ZZZeroYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2237
• WagamamaTV257
League of Legends
• Nemesis2643
• Jankos1722
• TFBlade742
• Stunt654
• HappyZerGling196
Upcoming Events
BSL: GosuLeague
6h 48m
RSL Revival
17h 18m
Zoun vs Classic
SHIN vs TriGGeR
herO vs Reynor
Maru vs MaxPax
WardiTV Korean Royale
21h 48m
Replay Cast
1d 8h
RSL Revival
1d 17h
WardiTV Korean Royale
1d 21h
IPSL
2 days
Julia vs Artosis
JDConan vs DragOn
BSL 21
2 days
TerrOr vs Aeternum
HBO vs Kyrie
RSL Revival
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
[ Show More ]
IPSL
3 days
StRyKeR vs OldBoy
Sziky vs Tarson
BSL 21
3 days
StRyKeR vs Artosis
OyAji vs KameZerg
Replay Cast
3 days
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Wardi Open
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
5 days
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-11-16
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
SLON Tour Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 3
META Madness #9
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.