• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 13:27
CEST 19:27
KST 02:27
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy18ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research8Weekly Cups (March 16-22): herO doubles, Cure surprises3Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool51Weekly Cups (March 9-15): herO, Clem, ByuN win4
StarCraft 2
General
Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool What mix of new & old maps do you want in the next ladder pool? (SC2) Aligulac acquired by REPLAYMAN.com/Stego Research Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple
Tourneys
RSL Season 4 announced for March-April Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly) WardiTV Mondays World University TeamLeague (500$+) | Signups Open
Strategy
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Frigid Storage Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026]
External Content
Mutation # 519 Inner Power The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone Mutation # 517 Distant Threat
Brood War
General
Klaucher discontinued / in-game color settings BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Pros React To: JaeDong vs Queen [ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash Gypsy to Korea
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Ro24 Group E [ASL21] Ro24 Group F Azhi's Colosseum - Foreign KCM
Strategy
What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread NASA and the Private Sector Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
China Uses Video Games to Sh…
TrAiDoS
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Electronics
mantequilla
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1405 users

MLG Winter Arena to be PPV - Page 167

Forum Index > SC2 General
4945 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 165 166 167 168 169 248 Next
Criticism is allowed. Undue flaming is not. Take a second to think your post through before you submit.

Bans will be handed out.

Should go without saying, but don't link restreams here either.
Meta
Profile Blog Joined June 2003
United States6225 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-15 05:47:41
February 15 2012 05:43 GMT
#3321
As someone who has, to this day, NEVER paid for ANY content from Korea, where all the actual best players are and where the best games are played, there is absolutely no chance I will pay for this content.

I want esports to be big and all, but the burden of monetizing shouldn't be on the fans.

I should add that I still watch the GSL, live, for free, almost every night. It's worth it for me to live by crazy ridiculous hours to see it, but not worth the money to watch it at any time.

Also, I feel so, so sorry for you gold membership buyers. I mean, it's your money, so if it's really worth that much to you, go for it. I would feel cheated.
good vibes only
Shaok
Profile Joined October 2010
297 Posts
February 15 2012 05:45 GMT
#3322
It's a separate event from MLG championship season IIRC. There is no reason to think you were granted access when purchasing Gold Member status.
Ice Climber
Profile Joined January 2012
United States46 Posts
February 15 2012 05:49 GMT
#3323
My two cents:

Money isn't a problem for myself, but $20.00 is too much to charge for a single weekend for the vast majority of people. I really doubt that will be the final price point.

I'm interested in seeing how well this does.

I'm probably going to end up paying for it myself with or without a price drop, but only because the player list is so stacked.

Assembly just does not have the same caliber of players showing up.
OuchyDathurts
Profile Joined September 2010
United States4588 Posts
February 15 2012 05:49 GMT
#3324
Some random thoughts on the whole situation. Maybe they're silly but maybe they're worth consideration. I'd email them in to MLG as food for thought but I'm not entirely sure where to send them.

What about charging in an a la carte method for those who can't catch the whole weekend? (Numbers are made up, can be changed around obviously) What if they charged say $5 a day and $10 for all 3? If you could only sit down and watch the sunday championship games then you throw down $5 and can still catch your games. Theoretically that's still more money in their pockets than they would get from someone that could only watch a day or 2 and just said "f it".

What about monetizing through barcrafts? Make it a completely opt in situation so some of the smaller "mom and pop" style barcrafts can just pay the $20 and watch their games. But maybe have a "barcraft package" where a larger barcraft can buy in for say $200 (made up, but bars do have to pay a LOT more for PPV packages than the normal consumer in general). For that price maybe MLG sends them a little swag bag for the barcraft to raffle off or whatever. A few T shirts, a sweatshirt, mousepads, whatever. Maybe they throw to a live webcam during a break as well to give them props. Obviously the price point would need to be at a place where MLG makes a profit after giving the barcraft stuff, but still not so much where the barcraft would feel screwed.

I dunno, to me, on paper at least, it seems like those are a few avenues that haven't been looked at that could do well.
LiquidDota Staff
aristarchus
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States652 Posts
February 15 2012 05:53 GMT
#3325
On February 15 2012 14:45 Shaok wrote:
It's a separate event from MLG championship season IIRC. There is no reason to think you were granted access when purchasing Gold Member status.

I've seen a bunch of quotes posted from MLG advertising that, while not perfectly clear or straightforward, definitely did provide some reason to think this would be included. It was, for example, stated that you'd get access to "pro circuit events", and this is a pro circuit event by most reasonable definitions. I think if MLG said "We always had 6 events before, but now this year we're having 1, and we're going to have 5 other events and call them 'MLG super tournaments' and you don't get access to any of that" I think a lot of people would be mad, for an obvious reason. Even if it has a different name, they're taking stuff people would think is part of what is included and pulling it out.

(I don't have a gold pass and have no stake in this fight - just don't like seeing this sort of fishy stuff.)
VirgilSC2
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States6151 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-15 05:56:48
February 15 2012 05:55 GMT
#3326
I think it's pretty pathetic that MLG wrote a "Questions about the MLG Winter Arena and PPV?" thread, and yet continue to ignore serious questions in it.

EDIT:

On February 15 2012 14:45 Shaok wrote:
It's a separate event from MLG championship season IIRC. There is no reason to think you were granted access when purchasing Gold Member status.


The MLG Gold Membership (prior to the change) stated "Access to HQ Live Pro Circuit Broadcasts"

MLG Winter Arena is being marketed as a Pro Circuit event.

Pretty straightforward way of thinking it WOULD be included.
Clarity Gaming #1 Fan | Avid MTG Grinder | @VirgilSC2
tdt
Profile Joined October 2010
United States3179 Posts
February 15 2012 05:55 GMT
#3327
On February 15 2012 14:49 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Some random thoughts on the whole situation. Maybe they're silly but maybe they're worth consideration. I'd email them in to MLG as food for thought but I'm not entirely sure where to send them.

What about charging in an a la carte method for those who can't catch the whole weekend? (Numbers are made up, can be changed around obviously) What if they charged say $5 a day and $10 for all 3? If you could only sit down and watch the sunday championship games then you throw down $5 and can still catch your games. Theoretically that's still more money in their pockets than they would get from someone that could only watch a day or 2 and just said "f it".

What about monetizing through barcrafts? Make it a completely opt in situation so some of the smaller "mom and pop" style barcrafts can just pay the $20 and watch their games. But maybe have a "barcraft package" where a larger barcraft can buy in for say $200 (made up, but bars do have to pay a LOT more for PPV packages than the normal consumer in general). For that price maybe MLG sends them a little swag bag for the barcraft to raffle off or whatever. A few T shirts, a sweatshirt, mousepads, whatever. Maybe they throw to a live webcam during a break as well to give them props. Obviously the price point would need to be at a place where MLG makes a profit after giving the barcraft stuff, but still not so much where the barcraft would feel screwed.

I dunno, to me, on paper at least, it seems like those are a few avenues that haven't been looked at that could do well.

All these ideas about monitizing are complete bullshit until you have a killer app. For example, Back when Zuffa bought UFC they sunk 80 million into it to make it a must watch before they turned a dime. Before that they got 4000PPV and were bankrupt.. Yes, takes money to make money and innovation too. That's where places like GSL and HSC come in. GSL has the best. HSC lets you get up close and personal. What is MLG? just another ordinarily FREE tournament who invites players and pays a rather paltry sum. No Thanks.
MC for president
OuchyDathurts
Profile Joined September 2010
United States4588 Posts
February 15 2012 06:01 GMT
#3328
On February 15 2012 14:55 tdt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 15 2012 14:49 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Some random thoughts on the whole situation. Maybe they're silly but maybe they're worth consideration. I'd email them in to MLG as food for thought but I'm not entirely sure where to send them.

What about charging in an a la carte method for those who can't catch the whole weekend? (Numbers are made up, can be changed around obviously) What if they charged say $5 a day and $10 for all 3? If you could only sit down and watch the sunday championship games then you throw down $5 and can still catch your games. Theoretically that's still more money in their pockets than they would get from someone that could only watch a day or 2 and just said "f it".

What about monetizing through barcrafts? Make it a completely opt in situation so some of the smaller "mom and pop" style barcrafts can just pay the $20 and watch their games. But maybe have a "barcraft package" where a larger barcraft can buy in for say $200 (made up, but bars do have to pay a LOT more for PPV packages than the normal consumer in general). For that price maybe MLG sends them a little swag bag for the barcraft to raffle off or whatever. A few T shirts, a sweatshirt, mousepads, whatever. Maybe they throw to a live webcam during a break as well to give them props. Obviously the price point would need to be at a place where MLG makes a profit after giving the barcraft stuff, but still not so much where the barcraft would feel screwed.

I dunno, to me, on paper at least, it seems like those are a few avenues that haven't been looked at that could do well.

All these ideas about monitizing are complete bullshit until you have a killer app. For example, Back when Zuffa bought UFC they sunk 80 million into it to make it a must watch before they turned a dime. Before that they got 4000PPV and were bankrupt.. Yes, takes money to make money and innovation too. That's where places like GSL and HSC come in. GSL has the best. HSC lets you get up close and personal. What is MLG? just another ordinarily FREE tournament who invites players and pays a rather paltry sum. No Thanks.


I'm aware of Zuffas beginnings. I believe I was the first to bring them up in one of these threads. The fact of the matter is MLG has decided to go with charging people. I understand their need to charge so they don't go under. I don't believe they went about it in quite the right manner. I also don't believe they explored all the possibilities and the $20 price point was setting the bar too high. I agree with Alex Garfield that $10 would have been the smart money. I also believe something like my second suggestion (which is completely optional) would have been a way to provide them a little revenue without all the backlash.

If the people behind MLG have any sense (and other tourney organizers for that matter) they'll be combing through all these threads to learn from this "mistake". I'm merely throwing out ideas.
LiquidDota Staff
tdt
Profile Joined October 2010
United States3179 Posts
February 15 2012 06:17 GMT
#3329
On February 15 2012 15:01 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 15 2012 14:55 tdt wrote:
On February 15 2012 14:49 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Some random thoughts on the whole situation. Maybe they're silly but maybe they're worth consideration. I'd email them in to MLG as food for thought but I'm not entirely sure where to send them.

What about charging in an a la carte method for those who can't catch the whole weekend? (Numbers are made up, can be changed around obviously) What if they charged say $5 a day and $10 for all 3? If you could only sit down and watch the sunday championship games then you throw down $5 and can still catch your games. Theoretically that's still more money in their pockets than they would get from someone that could only watch a day or 2 and just said "f it".

What about monetizing through barcrafts? Make it a completely opt in situation so some of the smaller "mom and pop" style barcrafts can just pay the $20 and watch their games. But maybe have a "barcraft package" where a larger barcraft can buy in for say $200 (made up, but bars do have to pay a LOT more for PPV packages than the normal consumer in general). For that price maybe MLG sends them a little swag bag for the barcraft to raffle off or whatever. A few T shirts, a sweatshirt, mousepads, whatever. Maybe they throw to a live webcam during a break as well to give them props. Obviously the price point would need to be at a place where MLG makes a profit after giving the barcraft stuff, but still not so much where the barcraft would feel screwed.

I dunno, to me, on paper at least, it seems like those are a few avenues that haven't been looked at that could do well.

All these ideas about monitizing are complete bullshit until you have a killer app. For example, Back when Zuffa bought UFC they sunk 80 million into it to make it a must watch before they turned a dime. Before that they got 4000PPV and were bankrupt.. Yes, takes money to make money and innovation too. That's where places like GSL and HSC come in. GSL has the best. HSC lets you get up close and personal. What is MLG? just another ordinarily FREE tournament who invites players and pays a rather paltry sum. No Thanks.


I'm aware of Zuffas beginnings. I believe I was the first to bring them up in one of these threads. The fact of the matter is MLG has decided to go with charging people. I understand their need to charge so they don't go under. I don't believe they went about it in quite the right manner. I also don't believe they explored all the possibilities and the $20 price point was setting the bar too high. I agree with Alex Garfield that $10 would have been the smart money. I also believe something like my second suggestion (which is completely optional) would have been a way to provide them a little revenue without all the backlash.

If the people behind MLG have any sense (and other tourney organizers for that matter) they'll be combing through all these threads to learn from this "mistake". I'm merely throwing out ideas.


I don't know if $10 is smart but certainly putting the cost less than the premier tournament (GSL) instead of above it couldn't hurt. But I still stand by my comment that you need a killer app to ask for money when there are plenty of FREE alternatives. People make purchases on relative value, not charity ("supporting esports" canard).
MC for president
foxmulder_ms
Profile Joined February 2011
United States140 Posts
February 15 2012 06:22 GMT
#3330
MLG people are out of their mind. If they think they can even have 5% of their viewership, they are dreaming. Forget about the community response, I wonder the reaction from sponsors of the teams and MLG. Nw, you will have at max 2000 views. Have happy little local LAN tournament down there....
Ricemagical
Profile Joined November 2010
270 Posts
February 15 2012 06:30 GMT
#3331
On February 15 2012 14:49 Ice Climber wrote:
My two cents:

Money isn't a problem for myself, but $20.00 is too much to charge for a single weekend for the vast majority of people. I really doubt that will be the final price point.

I'm interested in seeing how well this does.

I'm probably going to end up paying for it myself with or without a price drop, but only because the player list is so stacked.

Assembly just does not have the same caliber of players showing up.

Lol and how do you suppose they'll go about resetting the price? They'd have to refund a portion of the purchase made by all people who have already paid for the pass.
OuchyDathurts
Profile Joined September 2010
United States4588 Posts
February 15 2012 06:32 GMT
#3332
On February 15 2012 15:17 tdt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 15 2012 15:01 OuchyDathurts wrote:
On February 15 2012 14:55 tdt wrote:
On February 15 2012 14:49 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Some random thoughts on the whole situation. Maybe they're silly but maybe they're worth consideration. I'd email them in to MLG as food for thought but I'm not entirely sure where to send them.

What about charging in an a la carte method for those who can't catch the whole weekend? (Numbers are made up, can be changed around obviously) What if they charged say $5 a day and $10 for all 3? If you could only sit down and watch the sunday championship games then you throw down $5 and can still catch your games. Theoretically that's still more money in their pockets than they would get from someone that could only watch a day or 2 and just said "f it".

What about monetizing through barcrafts? Make it a completely opt in situation so some of the smaller "mom and pop" style barcrafts can just pay the $20 and watch their games. But maybe have a "barcraft package" where a larger barcraft can buy in for say $200 (made up, but bars do have to pay a LOT more for PPV packages than the normal consumer in general). For that price maybe MLG sends them a little swag bag for the barcraft to raffle off or whatever. A few T shirts, a sweatshirt, mousepads, whatever. Maybe they throw to a live webcam during a break as well to give them props. Obviously the price point would need to be at a place where MLG makes a profit after giving the barcraft stuff, but still not so much where the barcraft would feel screwed.

I dunno, to me, on paper at least, it seems like those are a few avenues that haven't been looked at that could do well.

All these ideas about monitizing are complete bullshit until you have a killer app. For example, Back when Zuffa bought UFC they sunk 80 million into it to make it a must watch before they turned a dime. Before that they got 4000PPV and were bankrupt.. Yes, takes money to make money and innovation too. That's where places like GSL and HSC come in. GSL has the best. HSC lets you get up close and personal. What is MLG? just another ordinarily FREE tournament who invites players and pays a rather paltry sum. No Thanks.


I'm aware of Zuffas beginnings. I believe I was the first to bring them up in one of these threads. The fact of the matter is MLG has decided to go with charging people. I understand their need to charge so they don't go under. I don't believe they went about it in quite the right manner. I also don't believe they explored all the possibilities and the $20 price point was setting the bar too high. I agree with Alex Garfield that $10 would have been the smart money. I also believe something like my second suggestion (which is completely optional) would have been a way to provide them a little revenue without all the backlash.

If the people behind MLG have any sense (and other tourney organizers for that matter) they'll be combing through all these threads to learn from this "mistake". I'm merely throwing out ideas.


I don't know if $10 is smart but certainly putting the cost less than the premier tournament (GSL) instead of above it couldn't hurt. But I still stand by my comment that you need a killer app to ask for money when there are plenty of FREE alternatives. People make purchases on relative value, not charity ("supporting esports" canard).


Well if they were deadset on charging $10 could be a whole lot less staggering to the community. I have no proof obviously, but I'm personally convinced they'd get over twice as many subs at $10 than they will at $20. It would have been wiser IMO for them to let the first event of the year be a free "proof of concept". Let people see what they can expect, then charge at the next event so people aren't completely in the dark as to what they're going to get for their money. Charging for things to be the same as they were in 2011 is silly, I'm sure they're going to try and iron out things. They've always improved with each MLG in 2011.

MLG does give you a decent product. I'll admit I've never caught the IPL championships, only a bit of HSC, a few GSL games (but GOM player hates me so I can't watch it). But I think MLG has the best announcers, they try and get koreans in to help legitimize it as not just a tier 2 tourney. They're on a better timeslot in the US which is nice compared to GSL. But the downtime between games can be unprofessionally long, pauses during a game to sort things out, things of that nature are big strikes against them. In 2011 it was decent, I overall enjoyed things, but decent doesn't necessarily warrant money. I'd like to see them succeed but time will tell.

They've claimed they're running at a net loss so they can't tread water forever. I'm skeptical about everything but I want to hope the best. I don't want this to be a money grab with no conscience behind it. I don't want sundance in the MLG crew to fold. I like (not love) most of what they do. So I just wanted to toss out some ideas that maybe they hadn't thought about (or other tourney organizers).
LiquidDota Staff
coolcor
Profile Joined February 2011
520 Posts
February 15 2012 06:33 GMT
#3333
On February 15 2012 15:30 Ricemagical wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 15 2012 14:49 Ice Climber wrote:
My two cents:

Money isn't a problem for myself, but $20.00 is too much to charge for a single weekend for the vast majority of people. I really doubt that will be the final price point.

I'm interested in seeing how well this does.

I'm probably going to end up paying for it myself with or without a price drop, but only because the player list is so stacked.

Assembly just does not have the same caliber of players showing up.

Lol and how do you suppose they'll go about resetting the price? They'd have to refund a portion of the purchase made by all people who have already paid for the pass.


Just do exactly what GOM did when they dropped the price from 50 to 20 before the first season. Give the people who already bought a ticket to the next one.
starcraftred
Profile Joined February 2012
Canada12 Posts
February 15 2012 06:35 GMT
#3334
Hi, I don't think PPV will work for SC2 like other sports like UFC.
Because you can see these same players playing tournaments elsewhere for free and often.
I only see it working if say there was contracts where you see certain players only in MLG maybe ala kespa type thing but even that wouldn't make much sense because frankly SC2 two years later is still volatile in nature.
Oh and UFC still has free type of shows on television so PPV by itself obvoiusly doesn't cut it... only way I can see it work is if mlg live event production is super high end aka BW proleague level and very hype.
quoting dead people makes me feel smart
NoBigDeal
Profile Joined September 2011
United States15 Posts
February 15 2012 06:50 GMT
#3335
On February 14 2012 16:50 Tachion wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]


This is hilarious.
choas
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
Canada23 Posts
February 15 2012 06:59 GMT
#3336
my two cents on this is that $20 is fair but i have a issue with this being a gold member i was told when i got my pass that i would get to view all of the MLG tournaments and game play. this dose not seem to be the case unless i pay another 20 dollars. i don't see why they didn't say something sooner or at least grandfather gold member's in or something just seems to be a slap in the face. am really looking forward too the lo3 tomorrow too hear what MLG and sundance has to say about it. depending on what he says i may never watch another MLG again. although i do have a question is there anyway a gold member could take legal action against MLG for what they did with the gold memberships and with adding the new arena, seeing as the gold membership was too cover everything? just a question is all. i hope MLG can fix this and put it be-hide them i hope they learn from it too.
human_ko
Profile Joined July 2010
Russian Federation676 Posts
February 15 2012 07:01 GMT
#3337
I wish I knew what PPV meant lol....
WOrd, yo.
tdt
Profile Joined October 2010
United States3179 Posts
February 15 2012 07:02 GMT
#3338
On February 15 2012 15:32 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 15 2012 15:17 tdt wrote:
On February 15 2012 15:01 OuchyDathurts wrote:
On February 15 2012 14:55 tdt wrote:
On February 15 2012 14:49 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Some random thoughts on the whole situation. Maybe they're silly but maybe they're worth consideration. I'd email them in to MLG as food for thought but I'm not entirely sure where to send them.

What about charging in an a la carte method for those who can't catch the whole weekend? (Numbers are made up, can be changed around obviously) What if they charged say $5 a day and $10 for all 3? If you could only sit down and watch the sunday championship games then you throw down $5 and can still catch your games. Theoretically that's still more money in their pockets than they would get from someone that could only watch a day or 2 and just said "f it".

What about monetizing through barcrafts? Make it a completely opt in situation so some of the smaller "mom and pop" style barcrafts can just pay the $20 and watch their games. But maybe have a "barcraft package" where a larger barcraft can buy in for say $200 (made up, but bars do have to pay a LOT more for PPV packages than the normal consumer in general). For that price maybe MLG sends them a little swag bag for the barcraft to raffle off or whatever. A few T shirts, a sweatshirt, mousepads, whatever. Maybe they throw to a live webcam during a break as well to give them props. Obviously the price point would need to be at a place where MLG makes a profit after giving the barcraft stuff, but still not so much where the barcraft would feel screwed.

I dunno, to me, on paper at least, it seems like those are a few avenues that haven't been looked at that could do well.

All these ideas about monitizing are complete bullshit until you have a killer app. For example, Back when Zuffa bought UFC they sunk 80 million into it to make it a must watch before they turned a dime. Before that they got 4000PPV and were bankrupt.. Yes, takes money to make money and innovation too. That's where places like GSL and HSC come in. GSL has the best. HSC lets you get up close and personal. What is MLG? just another ordinarily FREE tournament who invites players and pays a rather paltry sum. No Thanks.


I'm aware of Zuffas beginnings. I believe I was the first to bring them up in one of these threads. The fact of the matter is MLG has decided to go with charging people. I understand their need to charge so they don't go under. I don't believe they went about it in quite the right manner. I also don't believe they explored all the possibilities and the $20 price point was setting the bar too high. I agree with Alex Garfield that $10 would have been the smart money. I also believe something like my second suggestion (which is completely optional) would have been a way to provide them a little revenue without all the backlash.

If the people behind MLG have any sense (and other tourney organizers for that matter) they'll be combing through all these threads to learn from this "mistake". I'm merely throwing out ideas.


I don't know if $10 is smart but certainly putting the cost less than the premier tournament (GSL) instead of above it couldn't hurt. But I still stand by my comment that you need a killer app to ask for money when there are plenty of FREE alternatives. People make purchases on relative value, not charity ("supporting esports" canard).


Well if they were deadset on charging $10 could be a whole lot less staggering to the community. I have no proof obviously, but I'm personally convinced they'd get over twice as many subs at $10 than they will at $20. It would have been wiser IMO for them to let the first event of the year be a free "proof of concept". Let people see what they can expect, then charge at the next event so people aren't completely in the dark as to what they're going to get for their money. Charging for things to be the same as they were in 2011 is silly, I'm sure they're going to try and iron out things. They've always improved with each MLG in 2011.

MLG does give you a decent product. I'll admit I've never caught the IPL championships, only a bit of HSC, a few GSL games (but GOM player hates me so I can't watch it). But I think MLG has the best announcers, they try and get koreans in to help legitimize it as not just a tier 2 tourney. They're on a better timeslot in the US which is nice compared to GSL. But the downtime between games can be unprofessionally long, pauses during a game to sort things out, things of that nature are big strikes against them. In 2011 it was decent, I overall enjoyed things, but decent doesn't necessarily warrant money. I'd like to see them succeed but time will tell.

They've claimed they're running at a net loss so they can't tread water forever. I'm skeptical about everything but I want to hope the best. I don't want this to be a money grab with no conscience behind it. I don't want sundance in the MLG crew to fold. I like (not love) most of what they do. So I just wanted to toss out some ideas that maybe they hadn't thought about (or other tourney organizers).


I agree with your sentiments and predictions in general. I have no problem with a money grab either if market warrants it. Good businessman should get paid large and do because they give you something worth it. Obviously, from the majority of responses in this thread MLG is not yet there.
MC for president
Boblhead
Profile Joined August 2010
United States2577 Posts
February 15 2012 07:04 GMT
#3339
On February 15 2012 16:01 human_ko wrote:
I wish I knew what PPV meant lol....

Pay Per View, is usually limited to movies that just came out on DvD, Porn through your TV, Special sporting events Boxing/UFC/Cricket/soccer/etc.
tdt
Profile Joined October 2010
United States3179 Posts
February 15 2012 07:05 GMT
#3340
On February 15 2012 16:01 human_ko wrote:
I wish I knew what PPV meant lol....

You PAY PER VIEW (PPV). As in if you want to see event you pay for it. It's a revenue generator for many events in the west.
MC for president
Prev 1 165 166 167 168 169 248 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
14:00
uThermal 2v2 Circuit April
uThermal548
SteadfastSC307
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
uThermal 548
mouzHeroMarine 535
SteadfastSC 307
Hui .278
IndyStarCraft 136
Railgan 19
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 23217
Mini 1289
Shuttle 428
Larva 399
Sharp 332
firebathero 264
hero 178
ggaemo 177
Soulkey 154
Dewaltoss 114
[ Show more ]
Last 105
PianO 53
Hm[arnc] 48
sSak 47
Movie 35
Free 35
Shinee 26
Rock 21
HiyA 21
Sexy 18
Shine 14
IntoTheRainbow 14
Sacsri 9
Dota 2
qojqva4024
Counter-Strike
olofmeister5447
fl0m1580
byalli646
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor243
MindelVK21
Other Games
Grubby2770
FrodaN1239
B2W.Neo400
mouzStarbuck68
QueenE61
Trikslyr26
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick813
StarCraft 2
angryscii 1
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• iHatsuTV 6
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki25
• 80smullet 3
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos2608
• Nemesis1778
Other Games
• imaqtpie486
• Shiphtur193
• tFFMrPink 13
Upcoming Events
BSL
1h 33m
Afreeca Starleague
16h 33m
Wardi Open
16h 33m
Replay Cast
1d 6h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 16h
Kung Fu Cup
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
[ Show More ]
BSL
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S2: W1
WardiTV Winter 2026
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
CSL Elite League 2026
ASL Season 21
CSL Season 20: Qualifier 2
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026

Upcoming

CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
Escore Tournament S2: W2
IPSL Spring 2026
Escore Tournament S2: W3
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
RSL Revival: Season 5
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.