• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 21:35
CEST 03:35
KST 10:35
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters9[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915Serral wins Maestros of the Game 244
Community News
Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism8Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon?124Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)9Weekly Cups (August 24-30): Patches' balance mod takes over3New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery!46
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism SC4ALL: II Winner will earn a spot at HSC 30! SC4ALL II: StarCraft 2 Player Announcement 7/8 Nexon wins bid to develop StarCraft IP content, distribute Overwatch mobile game Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16)
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) 2026 GSTL Announcement Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) IntoTheTV X SOOP SC2 League : Weekly & Monthly
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 542 The Ascended Mutation # 541 Binary Choice The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 540 Dodge This
Brood War
General
[D] Brainstorming a balance patch for Brood war Practice Partners (Official) BW General Discussion Terran or Protoss Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon?
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Ro16 Group A [ASL22] Ro16 Group B KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
Strategy
Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread EVE Corporation Diablo IV [Maplestory Hardcore] Let's Play~!! General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
Virtual Romance, Real-Life C…
TrAiDoS
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
LOCKPICKING NOOB
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 7301 users

MLG Winter Arena to be PPV - Page 167

Forum Index > SC2 General
4945 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 165 166 167 168 169 248 Next
Criticism is allowed. Undue flaming is not. Take a second to think your post through before you submit.

Bans will be handed out.

Should go without saying, but don't link restreams here either.
Meta
Profile Blog Joined June 2003
United States6228 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-15 05:47:41
February 15 2012 05:43 GMT
#3321
As someone who has, to this day, NEVER paid for ANY content from Korea, where all the actual best players are and where the best games are played, there is absolutely no chance I will pay for this content.

I want esports to be big and all, but the burden of monetizing shouldn't be on the fans.

I should add that I still watch the GSL, live, for free, almost every night. It's worth it for me to live by crazy ridiculous hours to see it, but not worth the money to watch it at any time.

Also, I feel so, so sorry for you gold membership buyers. I mean, it's your money, so if it's really worth that much to you, go for it. I would feel cheated.
good vibes only
Shaok
Profile Joined October 2010
297 Posts
February 15 2012 05:45 GMT
#3322
It's a separate event from MLG championship season IIRC. There is no reason to think you were granted access when purchasing Gold Member status.
Ice Climber
Profile Joined January 2012
United States46 Posts
February 15 2012 05:49 GMT
#3323
My two cents:

Money isn't a problem for myself, but $20.00 is too much to charge for a single weekend for the vast majority of people. I really doubt that will be the final price point.

I'm interested in seeing how well this does.

I'm probably going to end up paying for it myself with or without a price drop, but only because the player list is so stacked.

Assembly just does not have the same caliber of players showing up.
OuchyDathurts
Profile Joined September 2010
United States4588 Posts
February 15 2012 05:49 GMT
#3324
Some random thoughts on the whole situation. Maybe they're silly but maybe they're worth consideration. I'd email them in to MLG as food for thought but I'm not entirely sure where to send them.

What about charging in an a la carte method for those who can't catch the whole weekend? (Numbers are made up, can be changed around obviously) What if they charged say $5 a day and $10 for all 3? If you could only sit down and watch the sunday championship games then you throw down $5 and can still catch your games. Theoretically that's still more money in their pockets than they would get from someone that could only watch a day or 2 and just said "f it".

What about monetizing through barcrafts? Make it a completely opt in situation so some of the smaller "mom and pop" style barcrafts can just pay the $20 and watch their games. But maybe have a "barcraft package" where a larger barcraft can buy in for say $200 (made up, but bars do have to pay a LOT more for PPV packages than the normal consumer in general). For that price maybe MLG sends them a little swag bag for the barcraft to raffle off or whatever. A few T shirts, a sweatshirt, mousepads, whatever. Maybe they throw to a live webcam during a break as well to give them props. Obviously the price point would need to be at a place where MLG makes a profit after giving the barcraft stuff, but still not so much where the barcraft would feel screwed.

I dunno, to me, on paper at least, it seems like those are a few avenues that haven't been looked at that could do well.
LiquidDota Staff
aristarchus
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States652 Posts
February 15 2012 05:53 GMT
#3325
On February 15 2012 14:45 Shaok wrote:
It's a separate event from MLG championship season IIRC. There is no reason to think you were granted access when purchasing Gold Member status.

I've seen a bunch of quotes posted from MLG advertising that, while not perfectly clear or straightforward, definitely did provide some reason to think this would be included. It was, for example, stated that you'd get access to "pro circuit events", and this is a pro circuit event by most reasonable definitions. I think if MLG said "We always had 6 events before, but now this year we're having 1, and we're going to have 5 other events and call them 'MLG super tournaments' and you don't get access to any of that" I think a lot of people would be mad, for an obvious reason. Even if it has a different name, they're taking stuff people would think is part of what is included and pulling it out.

(I don't have a gold pass and have no stake in this fight - just don't like seeing this sort of fishy stuff.)
VirgilSC2
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States6151 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-15 05:56:48
February 15 2012 05:55 GMT
#3326
I think it's pretty pathetic that MLG wrote a "Questions about the MLG Winter Arena and PPV?" thread, and yet continue to ignore serious questions in it.

EDIT:

On February 15 2012 14:45 Shaok wrote:
It's a separate event from MLG championship season IIRC. There is no reason to think you were granted access when purchasing Gold Member status.


The MLG Gold Membership (prior to the change) stated "Access to HQ Live Pro Circuit Broadcasts"

MLG Winter Arena is being marketed as a Pro Circuit event.

Pretty straightforward way of thinking it WOULD be included.
Clarity Gaming #1 Fan | Avid MTG Grinder | @VirgilSC2
tdt
Profile Joined October 2010
United States3179 Posts
February 15 2012 05:55 GMT
#3327
On February 15 2012 14:49 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Some random thoughts on the whole situation. Maybe they're silly but maybe they're worth consideration. I'd email them in to MLG as food for thought but I'm not entirely sure where to send them.

What about charging in an a la carte method for those who can't catch the whole weekend? (Numbers are made up, can be changed around obviously) What if they charged say $5 a day and $10 for all 3? If you could only sit down and watch the sunday championship games then you throw down $5 and can still catch your games. Theoretically that's still more money in their pockets than they would get from someone that could only watch a day or 2 and just said "f it".

What about monetizing through barcrafts? Make it a completely opt in situation so some of the smaller "mom and pop" style barcrafts can just pay the $20 and watch their games. But maybe have a "barcraft package" where a larger barcraft can buy in for say $200 (made up, but bars do have to pay a LOT more for PPV packages than the normal consumer in general). For that price maybe MLG sends them a little swag bag for the barcraft to raffle off or whatever. A few T shirts, a sweatshirt, mousepads, whatever. Maybe they throw to a live webcam during a break as well to give them props. Obviously the price point would need to be at a place where MLG makes a profit after giving the barcraft stuff, but still not so much where the barcraft would feel screwed.

I dunno, to me, on paper at least, it seems like those are a few avenues that haven't been looked at that could do well.

All these ideas about monitizing are complete bullshit until you have a killer app. For example, Back when Zuffa bought UFC they sunk 80 million into it to make it a must watch before they turned a dime. Before that they got 4000PPV and were bankrupt.. Yes, takes money to make money and innovation too. That's where places like GSL and HSC come in. GSL has the best. HSC lets you get up close and personal. What is MLG? just another ordinarily FREE tournament who invites players and pays a rather paltry sum. No Thanks.
MC for president
OuchyDathurts
Profile Joined September 2010
United States4588 Posts
February 15 2012 06:01 GMT
#3328
On February 15 2012 14:55 tdt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 15 2012 14:49 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Some random thoughts on the whole situation. Maybe they're silly but maybe they're worth consideration. I'd email them in to MLG as food for thought but I'm not entirely sure where to send them.

What about charging in an a la carte method for those who can't catch the whole weekend? (Numbers are made up, can be changed around obviously) What if they charged say $5 a day and $10 for all 3? If you could only sit down and watch the sunday championship games then you throw down $5 and can still catch your games. Theoretically that's still more money in their pockets than they would get from someone that could only watch a day or 2 and just said "f it".

What about monetizing through barcrafts? Make it a completely opt in situation so some of the smaller "mom and pop" style barcrafts can just pay the $20 and watch their games. But maybe have a "barcraft package" where a larger barcraft can buy in for say $200 (made up, but bars do have to pay a LOT more for PPV packages than the normal consumer in general). For that price maybe MLG sends them a little swag bag for the barcraft to raffle off or whatever. A few T shirts, a sweatshirt, mousepads, whatever. Maybe they throw to a live webcam during a break as well to give them props. Obviously the price point would need to be at a place where MLG makes a profit after giving the barcraft stuff, but still not so much where the barcraft would feel screwed.

I dunno, to me, on paper at least, it seems like those are a few avenues that haven't been looked at that could do well.

All these ideas about monitizing are complete bullshit until you have a killer app. For example, Back when Zuffa bought UFC they sunk 80 million into it to make it a must watch before they turned a dime. Before that they got 4000PPV and were bankrupt.. Yes, takes money to make money and innovation too. That's where places like GSL and HSC come in. GSL has the best. HSC lets you get up close and personal. What is MLG? just another ordinarily FREE tournament who invites players and pays a rather paltry sum. No Thanks.


I'm aware of Zuffas beginnings. I believe I was the first to bring them up in one of these threads. The fact of the matter is MLG has decided to go with charging people. I understand their need to charge so they don't go under. I don't believe they went about it in quite the right manner. I also don't believe they explored all the possibilities and the $20 price point was setting the bar too high. I agree with Alex Garfield that $10 would have been the smart money. I also believe something like my second suggestion (which is completely optional) would have been a way to provide them a little revenue without all the backlash.

If the people behind MLG have any sense (and other tourney organizers for that matter) they'll be combing through all these threads to learn from this "mistake". I'm merely throwing out ideas.
LiquidDota Staff
tdt
Profile Joined October 2010
United States3179 Posts
February 15 2012 06:17 GMT
#3329
On February 15 2012 15:01 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 15 2012 14:55 tdt wrote:
On February 15 2012 14:49 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Some random thoughts on the whole situation. Maybe they're silly but maybe they're worth consideration. I'd email them in to MLG as food for thought but I'm not entirely sure where to send them.

What about charging in an a la carte method for those who can't catch the whole weekend? (Numbers are made up, can be changed around obviously) What if they charged say $5 a day and $10 for all 3? If you could only sit down and watch the sunday championship games then you throw down $5 and can still catch your games. Theoretically that's still more money in their pockets than they would get from someone that could only watch a day or 2 and just said "f it".

What about monetizing through barcrafts? Make it a completely opt in situation so some of the smaller "mom and pop" style barcrafts can just pay the $20 and watch their games. But maybe have a "barcraft package" where a larger barcraft can buy in for say $200 (made up, but bars do have to pay a LOT more for PPV packages than the normal consumer in general). For that price maybe MLG sends them a little swag bag for the barcraft to raffle off or whatever. A few T shirts, a sweatshirt, mousepads, whatever. Maybe they throw to a live webcam during a break as well to give them props. Obviously the price point would need to be at a place where MLG makes a profit after giving the barcraft stuff, but still not so much where the barcraft would feel screwed.

I dunno, to me, on paper at least, it seems like those are a few avenues that haven't been looked at that could do well.

All these ideas about monitizing are complete bullshit until you have a killer app. For example, Back when Zuffa bought UFC they sunk 80 million into it to make it a must watch before they turned a dime. Before that they got 4000PPV and were bankrupt.. Yes, takes money to make money and innovation too. That's where places like GSL and HSC come in. GSL has the best. HSC lets you get up close and personal. What is MLG? just another ordinarily FREE tournament who invites players and pays a rather paltry sum. No Thanks.


I'm aware of Zuffas beginnings. I believe I was the first to bring them up in one of these threads. The fact of the matter is MLG has decided to go with charging people. I understand their need to charge so they don't go under. I don't believe they went about it in quite the right manner. I also don't believe they explored all the possibilities and the $20 price point was setting the bar too high. I agree with Alex Garfield that $10 would have been the smart money. I also believe something like my second suggestion (which is completely optional) would have been a way to provide them a little revenue without all the backlash.

If the people behind MLG have any sense (and other tourney organizers for that matter) they'll be combing through all these threads to learn from this "mistake". I'm merely throwing out ideas.


I don't know if $10 is smart but certainly putting the cost less than the premier tournament (GSL) instead of above it couldn't hurt. But I still stand by my comment that you need a killer app to ask for money when there are plenty of FREE alternatives. People make purchases on relative value, not charity ("supporting esports" canard).
MC for president
foxmulder_ms
Profile Joined February 2011
United States140 Posts
February 15 2012 06:22 GMT
#3330
MLG people are out of their mind. If they think they can even have 5% of their viewership, they are dreaming. Forget about the community response, I wonder the reaction from sponsors of the teams and MLG. Nw, you will have at max 2000 views. Have happy little local LAN tournament down there....
Ricemagical
Profile Joined November 2010
270 Posts
February 15 2012 06:30 GMT
#3331
On February 15 2012 14:49 Ice Climber wrote:
My two cents:

Money isn't a problem for myself, but $20.00 is too much to charge for a single weekend for the vast majority of people. I really doubt that will be the final price point.

I'm interested in seeing how well this does.

I'm probably going to end up paying for it myself with or without a price drop, but only because the player list is so stacked.

Assembly just does not have the same caliber of players showing up.

Lol and how do you suppose they'll go about resetting the price? They'd have to refund a portion of the purchase made by all people who have already paid for the pass.
OuchyDathurts
Profile Joined September 2010
United States4588 Posts
February 15 2012 06:32 GMT
#3332
On February 15 2012 15:17 tdt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 15 2012 15:01 OuchyDathurts wrote:
On February 15 2012 14:55 tdt wrote:
On February 15 2012 14:49 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Some random thoughts on the whole situation. Maybe they're silly but maybe they're worth consideration. I'd email them in to MLG as food for thought but I'm not entirely sure where to send them.

What about charging in an a la carte method for those who can't catch the whole weekend? (Numbers are made up, can be changed around obviously) What if they charged say $5 a day and $10 for all 3? If you could only sit down and watch the sunday championship games then you throw down $5 and can still catch your games. Theoretically that's still more money in their pockets than they would get from someone that could only watch a day or 2 and just said "f it".

What about monetizing through barcrafts? Make it a completely opt in situation so some of the smaller "mom and pop" style barcrafts can just pay the $20 and watch their games. But maybe have a "barcraft package" where a larger barcraft can buy in for say $200 (made up, but bars do have to pay a LOT more for PPV packages than the normal consumer in general). For that price maybe MLG sends them a little swag bag for the barcraft to raffle off or whatever. A few T shirts, a sweatshirt, mousepads, whatever. Maybe they throw to a live webcam during a break as well to give them props. Obviously the price point would need to be at a place where MLG makes a profit after giving the barcraft stuff, but still not so much where the barcraft would feel screwed.

I dunno, to me, on paper at least, it seems like those are a few avenues that haven't been looked at that could do well.

All these ideas about monitizing are complete bullshit until you have a killer app. For example, Back when Zuffa bought UFC they sunk 80 million into it to make it a must watch before they turned a dime. Before that they got 4000PPV and were bankrupt.. Yes, takes money to make money and innovation too. That's where places like GSL and HSC come in. GSL has the best. HSC lets you get up close and personal. What is MLG? just another ordinarily FREE tournament who invites players and pays a rather paltry sum. No Thanks.


I'm aware of Zuffas beginnings. I believe I was the first to bring them up in one of these threads. The fact of the matter is MLG has decided to go with charging people. I understand their need to charge so they don't go under. I don't believe they went about it in quite the right manner. I also don't believe they explored all the possibilities and the $20 price point was setting the bar too high. I agree with Alex Garfield that $10 would have been the smart money. I also believe something like my second suggestion (which is completely optional) would have been a way to provide them a little revenue without all the backlash.

If the people behind MLG have any sense (and other tourney organizers for that matter) they'll be combing through all these threads to learn from this "mistake". I'm merely throwing out ideas.


I don't know if $10 is smart but certainly putting the cost less than the premier tournament (GSL) instead of above it couldn't hurt. But I still stand by my comment that you need a killer app to ask for money when there are plenty of FREE alternatives. People make purchases on relative value, not charity ("supporting esports" canard).


Well if they were deadset on charging $10 could be a whole lot less staggering to the community. I have no proof obviously, but I'm personally convinced they'd get over twice as many subs at $10 than they will at $20. It would have been wiser IMO for them to let the first event of the year be a free "proof of concept". Let people see what they can expect, then charge at the next event so people aren't completely in the dark as to what they're going to get for their money. Charging for things to be the same as they were in 2011 is silly, I'm sure they're going to try and iron out things. They've always improved with each MLG in 2011.

MLG does give you a decent product. I'll admit I've never caught the IPL championships, only a bit of HSC, a few GSL games (but GOM player hates me so I can't watch it). But I think MLG has the best announcers, they try and get koreans in to help legitimize it as not just a tier 2 tourney. They're on a better timeslot in the US which is nice compared to GSL. But the downtime between games can be unprofessionally long, pauses during a game to sort things out, things of that nature are big strikes against them. In 2011 it was decent, I overall enjoyed things, but decent doesn't necessarily warrant money. I'd like to see them succeed but time will tell.

They've claimed they're running at a net loss so they can't tread water forever. I'm skeptical about everything but I want to hope the best. I don't want this to be a money grab with no conscience behind it. I don't want sundance in the MLG crew to fold. I like (not love) most of what they do. So I just wanted to toss out some ideas that maybe they hadn't thought about (or other tourney organizers).
LiquidDota Staff
coolcor
Profile Joined February 2011
520 Posts
February 15 2012 06:33 GMT
#3333
On February 15 2012 15:30 Ricemagical wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 15 2012 14:49 Ice Climber wrote:
My two cents:

Money isn't a problem for myself, but $20.00 is too much to charge for a single weekend for the vast majority of people. I really doubt that will be the final price point.

I'm interested in seeing how well this does.

I'm probably going to end up paying for it myself with or without a price drop, but only because the player list is so stacked.

Assembly just does not have the same caliber of players showing up.

Lol and how do you suppose they'll go about resetting the price? They'd have to refund a portion of the purchase made by all people who have already paid for the pass.


Just do exactly what GOM did when they dropped the price from 50 to 20 before the first season. Give the people who already bought a ticket to the next one.
starcraftred
Profile Joined February 2012
Canada12 Posts
February 15 2012 06:35 GMT
#3334
Hi, I don't think PPV will work for SC2 like other sports like UFC.
Because you can see these same players playing tournaments elsewhere for free and often.
I only see it working if say there was contracts where you see certain players only in MLG maybe ala kespa type thing but even that wouldn't make much sense because frankly SC2 two years later is still volatile in nature.
Oh and UFC still has free type of shows on television so PPV by itself obvoiusly doesn't cut it... only way I can see it work is if mlg live event production is super high end aka BW proleague level and very hype.
quoting dead people makes me feel smart
NoBigDeal
Profile Joined September 2011
United States15 Posts
February 15 2012 06:50 GMT
#3335
On February 14 2012 16:50 Tachion wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]


This is hilarious.
choas
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
Canada23 Posts
February 15 2012 06:59 GMT
#3336
my two cents on this is that $20 is fair but i have a issue with this being a gold member i was told when i got my pass that i would get to view all of the MLG tournaments and game play. this dose not seem to be the case unless i pay another 20 dollars. i don't see why they didn't say something sooner or at least grandfather gold member's in or something just seems to be a slap in the face. am really looking forward too the lo3 tomorrow too hear what MLG and sundance has to say about it. depending on what he says i may never watch another MLG again. although i do have a question is there anyway a gold member could take legal action against MLG for what they did with the gold memberships and with adding the new arena, seeing as the gold membership was too cover everything? just a question is all. i hope MLG can fix this and put it be-hide them i hope they learn from it too.
human_ko
Profile Joined July 2010
Russian Federation676 Posts
February 15 2012 07:01 GMT
#3337
I wish I knew what PPV meant lol....
WOrd, yo.
tdt
Profile Joined October 2010
United States3179 Posts
February 15 2012 07:02 GMT
#3338
On February 15 2012 15:32 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 15 2012 15:17 tdt wrote:
On February 15 2012 15:01 OuchyDathurts wrote:
On February 15 2012 14:55 tdt wrote:
On February 15 2012 14:49 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Some random thoughts on the whole situation. Maybe they're silly but maybe they're worth consideration. I'd email them in to MLG as food for thought but I'm not entirely sure where to send them.

What about charging in an a la carte method for those who can't catch the whole weekend? (Numbers are made up, can be changed around obviously) What if they charged say $5 a day and $10 for all 3? If you could only sit down and watch the sunday championship games then you throw down $5 and can still catch your games. Theoretically that's still more money in their pockets than they would get from someone that could only watch a day or 2 and just said "f it".

What about monetizing through barcrafts? Make it a completely opt in situation so some of the smaller "mom and pop" style barcrafts can just pay the $20 and watch their games. But maybe have a "barcraft package" where a larger barcraft can buy in for say $200 (made up, but bars do have to pay a LOT more for PPV packages than the normal consumer in general). For that price maybe MLG sends them a little swag bag for the barcraft to raffle off or whatever. A few T shirts, a sweatshirt, mousepads, whatever. Maybe they throw to a live webcam during a break as well to give them props. Obviously the price point would need to be at a place where MLG makes a profit after giving the barcraft stuff, but still not so much where the barcraft would feel screwed.

I dunno, to me, on paper at least, it seems like those are a few avenues that haven't been looked at that could do well.

All these ideas about monitizing are complete bullshit until you have a killer app. For example, Back when Zuffa bought UFC they sunk 80 million into it to make it a must watch before they turned a dime. Before that they got 4000PPV and were bankrupt.. Yes, takes money to make money and innovation too. That's where places like GSL and HSC come in. GSL has the best. HSC lets you get up close and personal. What is MLG? just another ordinarily FREE tournament who invites players and pays a rather paltry sum. No Thanks.


I'm aware of Zuffas beginnings. I believe I was the first to bring them up in one of these threads. The fact of the matter is MLG has decided to go with charging people. I understand their need to charge so they don't go under. I don't believe they went about it in quite the right manner. I also don't believe they explored all the possibilities and the $20 price point was setting the bar too high. I agree with Alex Garfield that $10 would have been the smart money. I also believe something like my second suggestion (which is completely optional) would have been a way to provide them a little revenue without all the backlash.

If the people behind MLG have any sense (and other tourney organizers for that matter) they'll be combing through all these threads to learn from this "mistake". I'm merely throwing out ideas.


I don't know if $10 is smart but certainly putting the cost less than the premier tournament (GSL) instead of above it couldn't hurt. But I still stand by my comment that you need a killer app to ask for money when there are plenty of FREE alternatives. People make purchases on relative value, not charity ("supporting esports" canard).


Well if they were deadset on charging $10 could be a whole lot less staggering to the community. I have no proof obviously, but I'm personally convinced they'd get over twice as many subs at $10 than they will at $20. It would have been wiser IMO for them to let the first event of the year be a free "proof of concept". Let people see what they can expect, then charge at the next event so people aren't completely in the dark as to what they're going to get for their money. Charging for things to be the same as they were in 2011 is silly, I'm sure they're going to try and iron out things. They've always improved with each MLG in 2011.

MLG does give you a decent product. I'll admit I've never caught the IPL championships, only a bit of HSC, a few GSL games (but GOM player hates me so I can't watch it). But I think MLG has the best announcers, they try and get koreans in to help legitimize it as not just a tier 2 tourney. They're on a better timeslot in the US which is nice compared to GSL. But the downtime between games can be unprofessionally long, pauses during a game to sort things out, things of that nature are big strikes against them. In 2011 it was decent, I overall enjoyed things, but decent doesn't necessarily warrant money. I'd like to see them succeed but time will tell.

They've claimed they're running at a net loss so they can't tread water forever. I'm skeptical about everything but I want to hope the best. I don't want this to be a money grab with no conscience behind it. I don't want sundance in the MLG crew to fold. I like (not love) most of what they do. So I just wanted to toss out some ideas that maybe they hadn't thought about (or other tourney organizers).


I agree with your sentiments and predictions in general. I have no problem with a money grab either if market warrants it. Good businessman should get paid large and do because they give you something worth it. Obviously, from the majority of responses in this thread MLG is not yet there.
MC for president
Boblhead
Profile Joined August 2010
United States2577 Posts
February 15 2012 07:04 GMT
#3339
On February 15 2012 16:01 human_ko wrote:
I wish I knew what PPV meant lol....

Pay Per View, is usually limited to movies that just came out on DvD, Porn through your TV, Special sporting events Boxing/UFC/Cricket/soccer/etc.
tdt
Profile Joined October 2010
United States3179 Posts
February 15 2012 07:05 GMT
#3340
On February 15 2012 16:01 human_ko wrote:
I wish I knew what PPV meant lol....

You PAY PER VIEW (PPV). As in if you want to see event you pay for it. It's a revenue generator for many events in the west.
MC for president
Prev 1 165 166 167 168 169 248 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
22:30
Masters Cup #151
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RuFF_SC2 155
SpeCial 68
CosmosSc2 33
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 2044
GuemChi 1575
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm139
Counter-Strike
Fnx 874
m0e_tv262
minikerr35
Other Games
summit1g10892
shahzam520
C9.Mang0336
PiGStarcraft230
Maynarde104
ViBE100
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH321
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• davetesta4
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• Scarra1414
• imaqtpie688
Upcoming Events
Escore
8h 26m
IntoTheTV X SOOP
9h 26m
CranKy Ducklings
1d 8h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 9h
Cure vs Zoun
SHIN vs Classic
ByuN vs MaxPax
Percival vs YoungYakov
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
2 days
Spirit vs Mixu
Clem vs TBD
RSL Revival
2 days
Serral vs Rogue
BlizzCon
2 days
IdrA vs MC
Replay Cast
2 days
[ Show More ]
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
WardiTV Weekly
3 days
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
GSL
4 days
PiGosaur Cup
4 days
The PondCast
5 days
Kung Fu Cup
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-09-08
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - TRS
Escore Tournament S3: King of Kings
RSL Revival: Season 6
Calamity Invitational
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSA
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
SC4ALL II: Brood War
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.