• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:56
CEST 18:56
KST 01:56
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins EWC 202542Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 202510Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up5LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments3[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder10EWC 2025 - Replay Pack4Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced58
StarCraft 2
General
Clem Interview: "PvT is a bit insane right now" Serral wins EWC 2025 TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy Would you prefer the game to be balanced around top-tier pro level or average pro level? Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up
Tourneys
WardiTV Mondays $5,000 WardiTV Summer Championship 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 485 Death from Below Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars
Brood War
General
How do the new Battle.net ranks translate? Which top zerg/toss will fail in qualifiers? BW General Discussion Google Play ASL (Season 20) Announced Nobody gona talk about this year crazy qualifiers?
Tourneys
[ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 2 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches [ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 1
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers [G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition Does 1 second matter in StarCraft?
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Beyond All Reason [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Bitcoin discussion thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread 9/11 Anniversary
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
[Girl blog} My fema…
artosisisthebest
Sharpening the Filtration…
frozenclaw
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
The Link Between Fitness and…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 763 users

MLG Winter Arena to be PPV - Page 167

Forum Index > SC2 General
4945 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 165 166 167 168 169 248 Next
Criticism is allowed. Undue flaming is not. Take a second to think your post through before you submit.

Bans will be handed out.

Should go without saying, but don't link restreams here either.
Meta
Profile Blog Joined June 2003
United States6225 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-15 05:47:41
February 15 2012 05:43 GMT
#3321
As someone who has, to this day, NEVER paid for ANY content from Korea, where all the actual best players are and where the best games are played, there is absolutely no chance I will pay for this content.

I want esports to be big and all, but the burden of monetizing shouldn't be on the fans.

I should add that I still watch the GSL, live, for free, almost every night. It's worth it for me to live by crazy ridiculous hours to see it, but not worth the money to watch it at any time.

Also, I feel so, so sorry for you gold membership buyers. I mean, it's your money, so if it's really worth that much to you, go for it. I would feel cheated.
good vibes only
Shaok
Profile Joined October 2010
297 Posts
February 15 2012 05:45 GMT
#3322
It's a separate event from MLG championship season IIRC. There is no reason to think you were granted access when purchasing Gold Member status.
Ice Climber
Profile Joined January 2012
United States46 Posts
February 15 2012 05:49 GMT
#3323
My two cents:

Money isn't a problem for myself, but $20.00 is too much to charge for a single weekend for the vast majority of people. I really doubt that will be the final price point.

I'm interested in seeing how well this does.

I'm probably going to end up paying for it myself with or without a price drop, but only because the player list is so stacked.

Assembly just does not have the same caliber of players showing up.
OuchyDathurts
Profile Joined September 2010
United States4588 Posts
February 15 2012 05:49 GMT
#3324
Some random thoughts on the whole situation. Maybe they're silly but maybe they're worth consideration. I'd email them in to MLG as food for thought but I'm not entirely sure where to send them.

What about charging in an a la carte method for those who can't catch the whole weekend? (Numbers are made up, can be changed around obviously) What if they charged say $5 a day and $10 for all 3? If you could only sit down and watch the sunday championship games then you throw down $5 and can still catch your games. Theoretically that's still more money in their pockets than they would get from someone that could only watch a day or 2 and just said "f it".

What about monetizing through barcrafts? Make it a completely opt in situation so some of the smaller "mom and pop" style barcrafts can just pay the $20 and watch their games. But maybe have a "barcraft package" where a larger barcraft can buy in for say $200 (made up, but bars do have to pay a LOT more for PPV packages than the normal consumer in general). For that price maybe MLG sends them a little swag bag for the barcraft to raffle off or whatever. A few T shirts, a sweatshirt, mousepads, whatever. Maybe they throw to a live webcam during a break as well to give them props. Obviously the price point would need to be at a place where MLG makes a profit after giving the barcraft stuff, but still not so much where the barcraft would feel screwed.

I dunno, to me, on paper at least, it seems like those are a few avenues that haven't been looked at that could do well.
LiquidDota Staff
aristarchus
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States652 Posts
February 15 2012 05:53 GMT
#3325
On February 15 2012 14:45 Shaok wrote:
It's a separate event from MLG championship season IIRC. There is no reason to think you were granted access when purchasing Gold Member status.

I've seen a bunch of quotes posted from MLG advertising that, while not perfectly clear or straightforward, definitely did provide some reason to think this would be included. It was, for example, stated that you'd get access to "pro circuit events", and this is a pro circuit event by most reasonable definitions. I think if MLG said "We always had 6 events before, but now this year we're having 1, and we're going to have 5 other events and call them 'MLG super tournaments' and you don't get access to any of that" I think a lot of people would be mad, for an obvious reason. Even if it has a different name, they're taking stuff people would think is part of what is included and pulling it out.

(I don't have a gold pass and have no stake in this fight - just don't like seeing this sort of fishy stuff.)
VirgilSC2
Profile Blog Joined June 2011
United States6151 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-15 05:56:48
February 15 2012 05:55 GMT
#3326
I think it's pretty pathetic that MLG wrote a "Questions about the MLG Winter Arena and PPV?" thread, and yet continue to ignore serious questions in it.

EDIT:

On February 15 2012 14:45 Shaok wrote:
It's a separate event from MLG championship season IIRC. There is no reason to think you were granted access when purchasing Gold Member status.


The MLG Gold Membership (prior to the change) stated "Access to HQ Live Pro Circuit Broadcasts"

MLG Winter Arena is being marketed as a Pro Circuit event.

Pretty straightforward way of thinking it WOULD be included.
Clarity Gaming #1 Fan | Avid MTG Grinder | @VirgilSC2
tdt
Profile Joined October 2010
United States3179 Posts
February 15 2012 05:55 GMT
#3327
On February 15 2012 14:49 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Some random thoughts on the whole situation. Maybe they're silly but maybe they're worth consideration. I'd email them in to MLG as food for thought but I'm not entirely sure where to send them.

What about charging in an a la carte method for those who can't catch the whole weekend? (Numbers are made up, can be changed around obviously) What if they charged say $5 a day and $10 for all 3? If you could only sit down and watch the sunday championship games then you throw down $5 and can still catch your games. Theoretically that's still more money in their pockets than they would get from someone that could only watch a day or 2 and just said "f it".

What about monetizing through barcrafts? Make it a completely opt in situation so some of the smaller "mom and pop" style barcrafts can just pay the $20 and watch their games. But maybe have a "barcraft package" where a larger barcraft can buy in for say $200 (made up, but bars do have to pay a LOT more for PPV packages than the normal consumer in general). For that price maybe MLG sends them a little swag bag for the barcraft to raffle off or whatever. A few T shirts, a sweatshirt, mousepads, whatever. Maybe they throw to a live webcam during a break as well to give them props. Obviously the price point would need to be at a place where MLG makes a profit after giving the barcraft stuff, but still not so much where the barcraft would feel screwed.

I dunno, to me, on paper at least, it seems like those are a few avenues that haven't been looked at that could do well.

All these ideas about monitizing are complete bullshit until you have a killer app. For example, Back when Zuffa bought UFC they sunk 80 million into it to make it a must watch before they turned a dime. Before that they got 4000PPV and were bankrupt.. Yes, takes money to make money and innovation too. That's where places like GSL and HSC come in. GSL has the best. HSC lets you get up close and personal. What is MLG? just another ordinarily FREE tournament who invites players and pays a rather paltry sum. No Thanks.
MC for president
OuchyDathurts
Profile Joined September 2010
United States4588 Posts
February 15 2012 06:01 GMT
#3328
On February 15 2012 14:55 tdt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 15 2012 14:49 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Some random thoughts on the whole situation. Maybe they're silly but maybe they're worth consideration. I'd email them in to MLG as food for thought but I'm not entirely sure where to send them.

What about charging in an a la carte method for those who can't catch the whole weekend? (Numbers are made up, can be changed around obviously) What if they charged say $5 a day and $10 for all 3? If you could only sit down and watch the sunday championship games then you throw down $5 and can still catch your games. Theoretically that's still more money in their pockets than they would get from someone that could only watch a day or 2 and just said "f it".

What about monetizing through barcrafts? Make it a completely opt in situation so some of the smaller "mom and pop" style barcrafts can just pay the $20 and watch their games. But maybe have a "barcraft package" where a larger barcraft can buy in for say $200 (made up, but bars do have to pay a LOT more for PPV packages than the normal consumer in general). For that price maybe MLG sends them a little swag bag for the barcraft to raffle off or whatever. A few T shirts, a sweatshirt, mousepads, whatever. Maybe they throw to a live webcam during a break as well to give them props. Obviously the price point would need to be at a place where MLG makes a profit after giving the barcraft stuff, but still not so much where the barcraft would feel screwed.

I dunno, to me, on paper at least, it seems like those are a few avenues that haven't been looked at that could do well.

All these ideas about monitizing are complete bullshit until you have a killer app. For example, Back when Zuffa bought UFC they sunk 80 million into it to make it a must watch before they turned a dime. Before that they got 4000PPV and were bankrupt.. Yes, takes money to make money and innovation too. That's where places like GSL and HSC come in. GSL has the best. HSC lets you get up close and personal. What is MLG? just another ordinarily FREE tournament who invites players and pays a rather paltry sum. No Thanks.


I'm aware of Zuffas beginnings. I believe I was the first to bring them up in one of these threads. The fact of the matter is MLG has decided to go with charging people. I understand their need to charge so they don't go under. I don't believe they went about it in quite the right manner. I also don't believe they explored all the possibilities and the $20 price point was setting the bar too high. I agree with Alex Garfield that $10 would have been the smart money. I also believe something like my second suggestion (which is completely optional) would have been a way to provide them a little revenue without all the backlash.

If the people behind MLG have any sense (and other tourney organizers for that matter) they'll be combing through all these threads to learn from this "mistake". I'm merely throwing out ideas.
LiquidDota Staff
tdt
Profile Joined October 2010
United States3179 Posts
February 15 2012 06:17 GMT
#3329
On February 15 2012 15:01 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 15 2012 14:55 tdt wrote:
On February 15 2012 14:49 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Some random thoughts on the whole situation. Maybe they're silly but maybe they're worth consideration. I'd email them in to MLG as food for thought but I'm not entirely sure where to send them.

What about charging in an a la carte method for those who can't catch the whole weekend? (Numbers are made up, can be changed around obviously) What if they charged say $5 a day and $10 for all 3? If you could only sit down and watch the sunday championship games then you throw down $5 and can still catch your games. Theoretically that's still more money in their pockets than they would get from someone that could only watch a day or 2 and just said "f it".

What about monetizing through barcrafts? Make it a completely opt in situation so some of the smaller "mom and pop" style barcrafts can just pay the $20 and watch their games. But maybe have a "barcraft package" where a larger barcraft can buy in for say $200 (made up, but bars do have to pay a LOT more for PPV packages than the normal consumer in general). For that price maybe MLG sends them a little swag bag for the barcraft to raffle off or whatever. A few T shirts, a sweatshirt, mousepads, whatever. Maybe they throw to a live webcam during a break as well to give them props. Obviously the price point would need to be at a place where MLG makes a profit after giving the barcraft stuff, but still not so much where the barcraft would feel screwed.

I dunno, to me, on paper at least, it seems like those are a few avenues that haven't been looked at that could do well.

All these ideas about monitizing are complete bullshit until you have a killer app. For example, Back when Zuffa bought UFC they sunk 80 million into it to make it a must watch before they turned a dime. Before that they got 4000PPV and were bankrupt.. Yes, takes money to make money and innovation too. That's where places like GSL and HSC come in. GSL has the best. HSC lets you get up close and personal. What is MLG? just another ordinarily FREE tournament who invites players and pays a rather paltry sum. No Thanks.


I'm aware of Zuffas beginnings. I believe I was the first to bring them up in one of these threads. The fact of the matter is MLG has decided to go with charging people. I understand their need to charge so they don't go under. I don't believe they went about it in quite the right manner. I also don't believe they explored all the possibilities and the $20 price point was setting the bar too high. I agree with Alex Garfield that $10 would have been the smart money. I also believe something like my second suggestion (which is completely optional) would have been a way to provide them a little revenue without all the backlash.

If the people behind MLG have any sense (and other tourney organizers for that matter) they'll be combing through all these threads to learn from this "mistake". I'm merely throwing out ideas.


I don't know if $10 is smart but certainly putting the cost less than the premier tournament (GSL) instead of above it couldn't hurt. But I still stand by my comment that you need a killer app to ask for money when there are plenty of FREE alternatives. People make purchases on relative value, not charity ("supporting esports" canard).
MC for president
foxmulder_ms
Profile Joined February 2011
United States140 Posts
February 15 2012 06:22 GMT
#3330
MLG people are out of their mind. If they think they can even have 5% of their viewership, they are dreaming. Forget about the community response, I wonder the reaction from sponsors of the teams and MLG. Nw, you will have at max 2000 views. Have happy little local LAN tournament down there....
Ricemagical
Profile Joined November 2010
270 Posts
February 15 2012 06:30 GMT
#3331
On February 15 2012 14:49 Ice Climber wrote:
My two cents:

Money isn't a problem for myself, but $20.00 is too much to charge for a single weekend for the vast majority of people. I really doubt that will be the final price point.

I'm interested in seeing how well this does.

I'm probably going to end up paying for it myself with or without a price drop, but only because the player list is so stacked.

Assembly just does not have the same caliber of players showing up.

Lol and how do you suppose they'll go about resetting the price? They'd have to refund a portion of the purchase made by all people who have already paid for the pass.
OuchyDathurts
Profile Joined September 2010
United States4588 Posts
February 15 2012 06:32 GMT
#3332
On February 15 2012 15:17 tdt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 15 2012 15:01 OuchyDathurts wrote:
On February 15 2012 14:55 tdt wrote:
On February 15 2012 14:49 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Some random thoughts on the whole situation. Maybe they're silly but maybe they're worth consideration. I'd email them in to MLG as food for thought but I'm not entirely sure where to send them.

What about charging in an a la carte method for those who can't catch the whole weekend? (Numbers are made up, can be changed around obviously) What if they charged say $5 a day and $10 for all 3? If you could only sit down and watch the sunday championship games then you throw down $5 and can still catch your games. Theoretically that's still more money in their pockets than they would get from someone that could only watch a day or 2 and just said "f it".

What about monetizing through barcrafts? Make it a completely opt in situation so some of the smaller "mom and pop" style barcrafts can just pay the $20 and watch their games. But maybe have a "barcraft package" where a larger barcraft can buy in for say $200 (made up, but bars do have to pay a LOT more for PPV packages than the normal consumer in general). For that price maybe MLG sends them a little swag bag for the barcraft to raffle off or whatever. A few T shirts, a sweatshirt, mousepads, whatever. Maybe they throw to a live webcam during a break as well to give them props. Obviously the price point would need to be at a place where MLG makes a profit after giving the barcraft stuff, but still not so much where the barcraft would feel screwed.

I dunno, to me, on paper at least, it seems like those are a few avenues that haven't been looked at that could do well.

All these ideas about monitizing are complete bullshit until you have a killer app. For example, Back when Zuffa bought UFC they sunk 80 million into it to make it a must watch before they turned a dime. Before that they got 4000PPV and were bankrupt.. Yes, takes money to make money and innovation too. That's where places like GSL and HSC come in. GSL has the best. HSC lets you get up close and personal. What is MLG? just another ordinarily FREE tournament who invites players and pays a rather paltry sum. No Thanks.


I'm aware of Zuffas beginnings. I believe I was the first to bring them up in one of these threads. The fact of the matter is MLG has decided to go with charging people. I understand their need to charge so they don't go under. I don't believe they went about it in quite the right manner. I also don't believe they explored all the possibilities and the $20 price point was setting the bar too high. I agree with Alex Garfield that $10 would have been the smart money. I also believe something like my second suggestion (which is completely optional) would have been a way to provide them a little revenue without all the backlash.

If the people behind MLG have any sense (and other tourney organizers for that matter) they'll be combing through all these threads to learn from this "mistake". I'm merely throwing out ideas.


I don't know if $10 is smart but certainly putting the cost less than the premier tournament (GSL) instead of above it couldn't hurt. But I still stand by my comment that you need a killer app to ask for money when there are plenty of FREE alternatives. People make purchases on relative value, not charity ("supporting esports" canard).


Well if they were deadset on charging $10 could be a whole lot less staggering to the community. I have no proof obviously, but I'm personally convinced they'd get over twice as many subs at $10 than they will at $20. It would have been wiser IMO for them to let the first event of the year be a free "proof of concept". Let people see what they can expect, then charge at the next event so people aren't completely in the dark as to what they're going to get for their money. Charging for things to be the same as they were in 2011 is silly, I'm sure they're going to try and iron out things. They've always improved with each MLG in 2011.

MLG does give you a decent product. I'll admit I've never caught the IPL championships, only a bit of HSC, a few GSL games (but GOM player hates me so I can't watch it). But I think MLG has the best announcers, they try and get koreans in to help legitimize it as not just a tier 2 tourney. They're on a better timeslot in the US which is nice compared to GSL. But the downtime between games can be unprofessionally long, pauses during a game to sort things out, things of that nature are big strikes against them. In 2011 it was decent, I overall enjoyed things, but decent doesn't necessarily warrant money. I'd like to see them succeed but time will tell.

They've claimed they're running at a net loss so they can't tread water forever. I'm skeptical about everything but I want to hope the best. I don't want this to be a money grab with no conscience behind it. I don't want sundance in the MLG crew to fold. I like (not love) most of what they do. So I just wanted to toss out some ideas that maybe they hadn't thought about (or other tourney organizers).
LiquidDota Staff
coolcor
Profile Joined February 2011
520 Posts
February 15 2012 06:33 GMT
#3333
On February 15 2012 15:30 Ricemagical wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 15 2012 14:49 Ice Climber wrote:
My two cents:

Money isn't a problem for myself, but $20.00 is too much to charge for a single weekend for the vast majority of people. I really doubt that will be the final price point.

I'm interested in seeing how well this does.

I'm probably going to end up paying for it myself with or without a price drop, but only because the player list is so stacked.

Assembly just does not have the same caliber of players showing up.

Lol and how do you suppose they'll go about resetting the price? They'd have to refund a portion of the purchase made by all people who have already paid for the pass.


Just do exactly what GOM did when they dropped the price from 50 to 20 before the first season. Give the people who already bought a ticket to the next one.
starcraftred
Profile Joined February 2012
Canada12 Posts
February 15 2012 06:35 GMT
#3334
Hi, I don't think PPV will work for SC2 like other sports like UFC.
Because you can see these same players playing tournaments elsewhere for free and often.
I only see it working if say there was contracts where you see certain players only in MLG maybe ala kespa type thing but even that wouldn't make much sense because frankly SC2 two years later is still volatile in nature.
Oh and UFC still has free type of shows on television so PPV by itself obvoiusly doesn't cut it... only way I can see it work is if mlg live event production is super high end aka BW proleague level and very hype.
quoting dead people makes me feel smart
NoBigDeal
Profile Joined September 2011
United States15 Posts
February 15 2012 06:50 GMT
#3335
On February 14 2012 16:50 Tachion wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]
[image loading]


This is hilarious.
choas
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
Canada23 Posts
February 15 2012 06:59 GMT
#3336
my two cents on this is that $20 is fair but i have a issue with this being a gold member i was told when i got my pass that i would get to view all of the MLG tournaments and game play. this dose not seem to be the case unless i pay another 20 dollars. i don't see why they didn't say something sooner or at least grandfather gold member's in or something just seems to be a slap in the face. am really looking forward too the lo3 tomorrow too hear what MLG and sundance has to say about it. depending on what he says i may never watch another MLG again. although i do have a question is there anyway a gold member could take legal action against MLG for what they did with the gold memberships and with adding the new arena, seeing as the gold membership was too cover everything? just a question is all. i hope MLG can fix this and put it be-hide them i hope they learn from it too.
human_ko
Profile Joined July 2010
Russian Federation676 Posts
February 15 2012 07:01 GMT
#3337
I wish I knew what PPV meant lol....
WOrd, yo.
tdt
Profile Joined October 2010
United States3179 Posts
February 15 2012 07:02 GMT
#3338
On February 15 2012 15:32 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 15 2012 15:17 tdt wrote:
On February 15 2012 15:01 OuchyDathurts wrote:
On February 15 2012 14:55 tdt wrote:
On February 15 2012 14:49 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Some random thoughts on the whole situation. Maybe they're silly but maybe they're worth consideration. I'd email them in to MLG as food for thought but I'm not entirely sure where to send them.

What about charging in an a la carte method for those who can't catch the whole weekend? (Numbers are made up, can be changed around obviously) What if they charged say $5 a day and $10 for all 3? If you could only sit down and watch the sunday championship games then you throw down $5 and can still catch your games. Theoretically that's still more money in their pockets than they would get from someone that could only watch a day or 2 and just said "f it".

What about monetizing through barcrafts? Make it a completely opt in situation so some of the smaller "mom and pop" style barcrafts can just pay the $20 and watch their games. But maybe have a "barcraft package" where a larger barcraft can buy in for say $200 (made up, but bars do have to pay a LOT more for PPV packages than the normal consumer in general). For that price maybe MLG sends them a little swag bag for the barcraft to raffle off or whatever. A few T shirts, a sweatshirt, mousepads, whatever. Maybe they throw to a live webcam during a break as well to give them props. Obviously the price point would need to be at a place where MLG makes a profit after giving the barcraft stuff, but still not so much where the barcraft would feel screwed.

I dunno, to me, on paper at least, it seems like those are a few avenues that haven't been looked at that could do well.

All these ideas about monitizing are complete bullshit until you have a killer app. For example, Back when Zuffa bought UFC they sunk 80 million into it to make it a must watch before they turned a dime. Before that they got 4000PPV and were bankrupt.. Yes, takes money to make money and innovation too. That's where places like GSL and HSC come in. GSL has the best. HSC lets you get up close and personal. What is MLG? just another ordinarily FREE tournament who invites players and pays a rather paltry sum. No Thanks.


I'm aware of Zuffas beginnings. I believe I was the first to bring them up in one of these threads. The fact of the matter is MLG has decided to go with charging people. I understand their need to charge so they don't go under. I don't believe they went about it in quite the right manner. I also don't believe they explored all the possibilities and the $20 price point was setting the bar too high. I agree with Alex Garfield that $10 would have been the smart money. I also believe something like my second suggestion (which is completely optional) would have been a way to provide them a little revenue without all the backlash.

If the people behind MLG have any sense (and other tourney organizers for that matter) they'll be combing through all these threads to learn from this "mistake". I'm merely throwing out ideas.


I don't know if $10 is smart but certainly putting the cost less than the premier tournament (GSL) instead of above it couldn't hurt. But I still stand by my comment that you need a killer app to ask for money when there are plenty of FREE alternatives. People make purchases on relative value, not charity ("supporting esports" canard).


Well if they were deadset on charging $10 could be a whole lot less staggering to the community. I have no proof obviously, but I'm personally convinced they'd get over twice as many subs at $10 than they will at $20. It would have been wiser IMO for them to let the first event of the year be a free "proof of concept". Let people see what they can expect, then charge at the next event so people aren't completely in the dark as to what they're going to get for their money. Charging for things to be the same as they were in 2011 is silly, I'm sure they're going to try and iron out things. They've always improved with each MLG in 2011.

MLG does give you a decent product. I'll admit I've never caught the IPL championships, only a bit of HSC, a few GSL games (but GOM player hates me so I can't watch it). But I think MLG has the best announcers, they try and get koreans in to help legitimize it as not just a tier 2 tourney. They're on a better timeslot in the US which is nice compared to GSL. But the downtime between games can be unprofessionally long, pauses during a game to sort things out, things of that nature are big strikes against them. In 2011 it was decent, I overall enjoyed things, but decent doesn't necessarily warrant money. I'd like to see them succeed but time will tell.

They've claimed they're running at a net loss so they can't tread water forever. I'm skeptical about everything but I want to hope the best. I don't want this to be a money grab with no conscience behind it. I don't want sundance in the MLG crew to fold. I like (not love) most of what they do. So I just wanted to toss out some ideas that maybe they hadn't thought about (or other tourney organizers).


I agree with your sentiments and predictions in general. I have no problem with a money grab either if market warrants it. Good businessman should get paid large and do because they give you something worth it. Obviously, from the majority of responses in this thread MLG is not yet there.
MC for president
Boblhead
Profile Joined August 2010
United States2577 Posts
February 15 2012 07:04 GMT
#3339
On February 15 2012 16:01 human_ko wrote:
I wish I knew what PPV meant lol....

Pay Per View, is usually limited to movies that just came out on DvD, Porn through your TV, Special sporting events Boxing/UFC/Cricket/soccer/etc.
tdt
Profile Joined October 2010
United States3179 Posts
February 15 2012 07:05 GMT
#3340
On February 15 2012 16:01 human_ko wrote:
I wish I knew what PPV meant lol....

You PAY PER VIEW (PPV). As in if you want to see event you pay for it. It's a revenue generator for many events in the west.
MC for president
Prev 1 165 166 167 168 169 248 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Summer Champion…
15:00
Open Qualifier #2
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Hui .309
BRAT_OK 122
UpATreeSC 101
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 4523
Rain 3167
Shuttle 2380
Bisu 2279
Flash 1303
firebathero 976
Mong 911
EffOrt 874
Horang2 815
Mini 700
[ Show more ]
Larva 542
Soulkey 395
ggaemo 349
Snow 197
Hyuk 154
ZerO 144
Barracks 133
hero 117
Soma 98
Dewaltoss 93
PianO 79
TY 70
Movie 64
Rush 60
sSak 44
sas.Sziky 42
Killer 40
Sharp 32
sorry 31
JYJ26
Aegong 23
scan(afreeca) 15
Terrorterran 13
SilentControl 6
[sc1f]eonzerg 3
Stormgate
TKL 201
Dota 2
Gorgc6858
qojqva4101
Dendi2535
syndereN445
XcaliburYe222
League of Legends
Reynor67
Counter-Strike
ScreaM2469
fl0m2098
flusha440
kRYSTAL_64
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox472
Other Games
singsing1903
KnowMe495
Lowko411
crisheroes260
Fuzer 197
oskar139
Trikslyr56
QueenE43
B2W.Neo35
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 21 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 98
• davetesta43
• iHatsuTV 13
• Dystopia_ 9
• Hinosc 7
• IndyKCrew
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix15
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 3784
• WagamamaTV658
• Shiphtur282
League of Legends
• Nemesis5547
• TFBlade1199
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Monday
7h 4m
WardiTV Summer Champion…
18h 4m
Stormgate Nexus
21h 4m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
23h 4m
The PondCast
1d 17h
WardiTV Summer Champion…
1d 18h
Replay Cast
2 days
LiuLi Cup
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
Wardi Open
5 days
RotterdaM Event
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
FEL Cracow 2025
CC Div. A S7

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
HCC Europe
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025

Upcoming

ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CS Asia Championships 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.