• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 16:04
CET 22:04
KST 06:04
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners2Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13TL.net Map Contest #21: Voting12[ASL20] Ro4 Preview: Descent11
Community News
Starcraft, SC2, HoTS, WC3, returning to Blizzcon!20$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship5[BSL21] RO32 Group Stage3Weekly Cups (Oct 26-Nov 2): Liquid, Clem, Solar win; LAN in Philly2Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win9
StarCraft 2
General
TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners Starcraft, SC2, HoTS, WC3, returning to Blizzcon! RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" Weekly Cups (Oct 20-26): MaxPax, Clem, Creator win 5.0.15 Patch Balance Hotfix (2025-10-8)
Tourneys
$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest Merivale 8 Open - LAN - Stellar Fest Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) $3,500 WardiTV Korean Royale S4
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection Mutation # 495 Rest In Peace
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ SnOw's ASL S20 Finals Review [BSL21] RO32 Group Stage Practice Partners (Official) [ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] RO32 Group B - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO32 Group A - Saturday 21:00 CET BSL21 Open Qualifiers Week & CONFIRM PARTICIPATION
Strategy
Current Meta How to stay on top of macro? PvZ map balance Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Dawn of War IV ZeroSpace Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine YouTube Thread Dating: How's your luck?
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Why we need SC3
Hildegard
Career Paths and Skills for …
TrAiDoS
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Our Last Hope in th…
KrillinFromwales
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1323 users

Thundertoss Joins Infinity Seven as Coach - Page 4

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
thundertoss
Profile Joined March 2010
United States1166 Posts
January 17 2012 19:36 GMT
#61
Thanks Andre. We are now in a very select group of NA team coaches ^_^
Underneath David Kims banelings is another control group of banelings.
rUiNati0n
Profile Joined December 2010
United States1155 Posts
January 17 2012 19:41 GMT
#62
Congrats to THundertoss and iS. I hope this leads to more hype/marketing of iS. It seems to be a pretty underrated team compared to the caliber of their players!
eating corn while thinking about eating more corn
Danglars
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States12133 Posts
January 18 2012 03:45 GMT
#63
Really enjoy your casting, thundertoss! Glad to have you on board!
Great armies come from happy zealots, and happy zealots come from California!
TL+ Member
KawaiiRice
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
United States2914 Posts
January 18 2012 03:58 GMT
#64
On January 18 2012 04:36 thundertoss wrote:
Thanks Andre. We are now in a very select group of NA team coaches ^_^

im an NA team coach sort of
@KawaiiRiceLighT
BlueBoxSC
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United States582 Posts
January 18 2012 04:06 GMT
#65
I think it's great that we're beginning to see more and more beyond just the players of the SC2 scene. With coaches like Thundertoss releasing interviews, I'm looking forward to 2012.
BwCBlueBox.837
dAPhREAk
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Nauru12397 Posts
January 18 2012 04:09 GMT
#66
ascend and thundertoss' koth top 200 is awesome.

however, i dont understand why teams are picking up no-name players and making them coaches. this team, and previously team legion with destructive.

what exactly do coaches do that doesnt require them to be extremely good at the game? isnt crazymoving and jecho on a level fifteen floors above thundertoss?
honed
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada482 Posts
January 18 2012 04:09 GMT
#67
sickest hair ever
dAPhREAk
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Nauru12397 Posts
January 18 2012 04:17 GMT
#68
On January 17 2012 04:29 singularity14 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 17 2012 04:27 Dfgj wrote:
On January 17 2012 03:42 VPFaith wrote:
On January 17 2012 02:58 Fade1 wrote:
On January 17 2012 02:52 T.O.P. wrote:
On January 17 2012 02:40 Fade1 wrote:
jEcho & Maker talked smack about almost all clanmembers and our clan itself without any reason (jEcho for the mostpart). They did this because they didint think anyone would see it because they wrote all the shittalking in their private team chat

What's wrong if it's in the private team chat? Why would anyone bother with being politically correct to teammates.
On January 17 2012 02:40 Fade1 wrote:
jEcho streamed though and thats how we saw the bad manners.

It's not bad manner if he didn't say it in front of you.


I think its quite sad if they sit and say our players are gay and retarded and saying our team is shit and were so fucking bad while streaming.


Freedom of Speech is part of our First Amendment. They can express their thoughts about anyone. As long as they are not expressing those comments during games, it should not be considered bad manner.

What do American amendments have to do with the internet?


because even though it doesn't influence law elsewhere in the world, American amendments are the ideal the rest of the world should strive for

please god, let this guy not be an american. not only does the U.S. constitution not apply to the rest of the world, but it also doesnt even apply here. the first amendment prevents the _government_ from restricting speech, it has no application to private people restricting other private people's speech.
PyreSC
Profile Joined September 2010
United States258 Posts
January 18 2012 04:20 GMT
#69
Great caster and game analyst! Look forward to your professionalism on iS
ucsd~
thundertoss
Profile Joined March 2010
United States1166 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-18 05:18:16
January 18 2012 05:16 GMT
#70
On January 18 2012 13:09 dAPhREAk wrote:
ascend and thundertoss' koth top 200 is awesome.

however, i dont understand why teams are picking up no-name players and making them coaches. this team, and previously team legion with destructive.

what exactly do coaches do that doesnt require them to be extremely good at the game? isnt crazymoving and jecho on a level fifteen floors above thundertoss?


I believe all those things are addressed in the interview. You really should read it. ^_^
Underneath David Kims banelings is another control group of banelings.
thundertoss
Profile Joined March 2010
United States1166 Posts
January 18 2012 05:18 GMT
#71
On January 18 2012 12:58 KawaiiRice wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 04:36 thundertoss wrote:
Thanks Andre. We are now in a very select group of NA team coaches ^_^

im an NA team coach sort of


i'll consider you as part of our select group. I didn't say we were the only ones ^_^ you've turned kiwi/light into a fearsome team (as evidenced by the semi dramatic nastl match ; p )
Underneath David Kims banelings is another control group of banelings.
Superiorwolf
Profile Blog Joined March 2007
United States5509 Posts
January 18 2012 05:27 GMT
#72
thundertoss is awesome guy with awesome hair and awesome top 200 koth. Grats and iS is very lucky to have him
Check out my stream at www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=315053 and follow me on Twitter @EGSuppy! :)
dAPhREAk
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Nauru12397 Posts
January 18 2012 05:35 GMT
#73
On January 18 2012 14:16 thundertoss wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 13:09 dAPhREAk wrote:
ascend and thundertoss' koth top 200 is awesome.

however, i dont understand why teams are picking up no-name players and making them coaches. this team, and previously team legion with destructive.

what exactly do coaches do that doesnt require them to be extremely good at the game? isnt crazymoving and jecho on a level fifteen floors above thundertoss?


I believe all those things are addressed in the interview. You really should read it. ^_^

i didnt intend for this to be aggressive or insulting (and i did read the interview). what i am wondering is what you have to offer to better players? i looked at your record and i dont even see that you have ever played a 1v1 game on ladder (assuming its you). most people argue that diamond and below (even masters and low gm players) should not be allowed in the strategy section, yet teams are picking up such players as coaches. what gives?

http://www.sc2ranks.com/us/1118450/thundertoss

i have watched koth 200 since it started and i love your contribution to the community, but the recent trend of teams picking up non-1v1 players as coaches is just disturbing to me. teams need to pick up top players as coaches or there will never be any improvement.

as i write this i realize it can easily be taken as insulting, so i will just end with congratulations to you, i am glad at your success and hope you continue with the koth 200, which i love.
Akta
Profile Joined February 2011
447 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-18 06:02:26
January 18 2012 05:58 GMT
#74
On January 18 2012 14:35 dAPhREAk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 14:16 thundertoss wrote:
On January 18 2012 13:09 dAPhREAk wrote:
ascend and thundertoss' koth top 200 is awesome.

however, i dont understand why teams are picking up no-name players and making them coaches. this team, and previously team legion with destructive.

what exactly do coaches do that doesnt require them to be extremely good at the game? isnt crazymoving and jecho on a level fifteen floors above thundertoss?


I believe all those things are addressed in the interview. You really should read it. ^_^

i didnt intend for this to be aggressive or insulting (and i did read the interview). what i am wondering is what you have to offer to better players? i looked at your record and i dont even see that you have ever played a 1v1 game on ladder (assuming its you). most people argue that diamond and below (even masters and low gm players) should not be allowed in the strategy section, yet teams are picking up such players as coaches. what gives?

http://www.sc2ranks.com/us/1118450/thundertoss

i have watched koth 200 since it started and i love your contribution to the community, but the recent trend of teams picking up non-1v1 players as coaches is just disturbing to me. teams need to pick up top players as coaches or there will never be any improvement.

as i write this i realize it can easily be taken as insulting, so i will just end with congratulations to you, i am glad at your success and hope you continue with the koth 200, which i love.
Because the coach doesn't necessarily have to be better at understanding strategies etc than the players. And being good at executing strategies doesn't necessarily mean you have a good understanding of strategies either, and so on.

In reality, coaching(in any sport) tend to be based on dialog. And there is no simple formula for finding out who will be an amazing coach.
thundertoss
Profile Joined March 2010
United States1166 Posts
January 18 2012 06:33 GMT
#75
On January 18 2012 14:35 dAPhREAk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 14:16 thundertoss wrote:
On January 18 2012 13:09 dAPhREAk wrote:
ascend and thundertoss' koth top 200 is awesome.

however, i dont understand why teams are picking up no-name players and making them coaches. this team, and previously team legion with destructive.

what exactly do coaches do that doesnt require them to be extremely good at the game? isnt crazymoving and jecho on a level fifteen floors above thundertoss?


I believe all those things are addressed in the interview. You really should read it. ^_^

i didnt intend for this to be aggressive or insulting (and i did read the interview). what i am wondering is what you have to offer to better players? i looked at your record and i dont even see that you have ever played a 1v1 game on ladder (assuming its you). most people argue that diamond and below (even masters and low gm players) should not be allowed in the strategy section, yet teams are picking up such players as coaches. what gives?

http://www.sc2ranks.com/us/1118450/thundertoss

i have watched koth 200 since it started and i love your contribution to the community, but the recent trend of teams picking up non-1v1 players as coaches is just disturbing to me. teams need to pick up top players as coaches or there will never be any improvement.

as i write this i realize it can easily be taken as insulting, so i will just end with congratulations to you, i am glad at your success and hope you continue with the koth 200, which i love.



I'll answer with some quick points since I get it a lot. Obviously it's a valid question since most people think that the only way to learn is to play and hence another reason why there aren't many coaches.

First of all, my understanding is much higher than what my ladder ranking is going to show. That holds true for quiet a few people. Take day9 for instance who has made it known that when he had time to commit to playing he had multiple gm accounts. Now that he doesn't have time to play it would take him a while to get there.
Your ability to play is you matching your mechanics with your game knowledge and decision making. The reflection of that ability is your ladder ranking/ tournament performances. However it is important to note that if you don't have much time to ladder or time to focus on laddering (aka only have free time when you're already tired or something) your rank won't really be a true rank. Without a large enough sample set (aka lots of games) its hard to say where someone really belongs. That's why someone like MC can place into platinum (homestory cup). Obviously for him he can quickly continue to win and reach a higher MMR but he's also a player first. That means he's trained his mechanics as well as his knowledge. Someone in my position has sacrificed part of that. I am not a player first. My knowledge is derived from analyzing a large sample set. Think of it as trading mechanics for broader knowledge.
The other important part of this is the idea that you can't learn without playing. That's not true for this. While it is true that watching NBA games isn't going to make you good at 3 pointers or allow you to dunk it doesn't mean that someone who watches games rather than playing is a bad coach. In fact most nba coaches will just watch games, study players, and can't dunk. Obviously I can elaborate on this but the point is that you don't have to be able to dunk to coach basketball. I'm using my knowledge to help coach, not my mechanics.

2nd analogy: Before anybody becomes a surgeon, they study a long, long time from books. Books that describe where are the organs are and how they function. What medicines affect what. They can tell you where to cut for a surgery but they won't keep your hand steady. I am that book.
You might make arguments like "Well I bet you can't write that book without actually doing a surgery", but that would be wrong. Yes the surgery has to be done but no one surgeon who has spent the time to be the very best (and therefore qualified to write a section) can write the entire book. To write the book you get a writer, you have him take down everything from those qualified experts, and you put it all together. The Top 200 KOTH, GSL, and the countless games I've observed, analyzed and casted, are me (the writer) putting together all the knowledge in one place (my mind/ the book). And thus, despite my lack of ladder games and therefore non gm account, I am still completely qualified to help even the very top echelon of players improve.

So I guess that wasn't as short as I thought it would be but I could certainly explain more.

TL:DR - I've scarified mechanics and ladder time for learning/analyzing time. I learn from watching the best. Someone like day9 still has a very strong understanding of the game even if he doesn't have time to play it at the level of his knowledge. While most sub-gm rated players would not be qualified for this position, most have not spent the time LEARNING the game that I have. Even Code-S players improve by going back and WATCHING their games with help from coaches like Cella (not code S). Obviously they can't JUST watch because SC is not chess it has a physical/mechanics component as well.

^afterthought. Think of it like chess. You don't need to move the pieces to understand/be good. SC is more because its real time and has mechanics, but as I am not a player I don't need mechanics.( you can't really teach speed anyhow...)

Hope that answers your question. I know a lot of other people were probably wondering the same thing. And don't worry it's not insulting to me. There's very little way of you knowing my qualifications unless you've gotten coached by me or have talked to the players I've helped.
Underneath David Kims banelings is another control group of banelings.
thundertoss
Profile Joined March 2010
United States1166 Posts
January 18 2012 06:38 GMT
#76
On January 18 2012 14:58 Akta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 14:35 dAPhREAk wrote:
On January 18 2012 14:16 thundertoss wrote:
On January 18 2012 13:09 dAPhREAk wrote:
ascend and thundertoss' koth top 200 is awesome.

however, i dont understand why teams are picking up no-name players and making them coaches. this team, and previously team legion with destructive.

what exactly do coaches do that doesnt require them to be extremely good at the game? isnt crazymoving and jecho on a level fifteen floors above thundertoss?


I believe all those things are addressed in the interview. You really should read it. ^_^

i didnt intend for this to be aggressive or insulting (and i did read the interview). what i am wondering is what you have to offer to better players? i looked at your record and i dont even see that you have ever played a 1v1 game on ladder (assuming its you). most people argue that diamond and below (even masters and low gm players) should not be allowed in the strategy section, yet teams are picking up such players as coaches. what gives?

http://www.sc2ranks.com/us/1118450/thundertoss

i have watched koth 200 since it started and i love your contribution to the community, but the recent trend of teams picking up non-1v1 players as coaches is just disturbing to me. teams need to pick up top players as coaches or there will never be any improvement.

as i write this i realize it can easily be taken as insulting, so i will just end with congratulations to you, i am glad at your success and hope you continue with the koth 200, which i love.
Because the coach doesn't necessarily have to be better at understanding strategies etc than the players. And being good at executing strategies doesn't necessarily mean you have a good understanding of strategies either, and so on.

In reality, coaching(in any sport) tend to be based on dialog. And there is no simple formula for finding out who will be an amazing coach.


Obviously I was taking time to write my own response and didn't see yours. I agree with you.

Luckily I am quite adept at understanding strategies. It is part of what I teach occasionally even though the more important part is understanding the logic behind strategies and helping players with that understanding such that they are able to make the correct decisions in any situation. But yes. I learn from players as much as they learn from me. Just like the current GSL players are learning from each other.
Underneath David Kims banelings is another control group of banelings.
dAPhREAk
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Nauru12397 Posts
January 18 2012 06:45 GMT
#77
On January 18 2012 15:33 thundertoss wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 14:35 dAPhREAk wrote:
On January 18 2012 14:16 thundertoss wrote:
On January 18 2012 13:09 dAPhREAk wrote:
ascend and thundertoss' koth top 200 is awesome.

however, i dont understand why teams are picking up no-name players and making them coaches. this team, and previously team legion with destructive.

what exactly do coaches do that doesnt require them to be extremely good at the game? isnt crazymoving and jecho on a level fifteen floors above thundertoss?


I believe all those things are addressed in the interview. You really should read it. ^_^

i didnt intend for this to be aggressive or insulting (and i did read the interview). what i am wondering is what you have to offer to better players? i looked at your record and i dont even see that you have ever played a 1v1 game on ladder (assuming its you). most people argue that diamond and below (even masters and low gm players) should not be allowed in the strategy section, yet teams are picking up such players as coaches. what gives?

http://www.sc2ranks.com/us/1118450/thundertoss

i have watched koth 200 since it started and i love your contribution to the community, but the recent trend of teams picking up non-1v1 players as coaches is just disturbing to me. teams need to pick up top players as coaches or there will never be any improvement.

as i write this i realize it can easily be taken as insulting, so i will just end with congratulations to you, i am glad at your success and hope you continue with the koth 200, which i love.



+ Show Spoiler +
I'll answer with some quick points since I get it a lot. Obviously it's a valid question since most people think that the only way to learn is to play and hence another reason why there aren't many coaches.

First of all, my understanding is much higher than what my ladder ranking is going to show. That holds true for quiet a few people. Take day9 for instance who has made it known that when he had time to commit to playing he had multiple gm accounts. Now that he doesn't have time to play it would take him a while to get there.
Your ability to play is you matching your mechanics with your game knowledge and decision making. The reflection of that ability is your ladder ranking/ tournament performances. However it is important to note that if you don't have much time to ladder or time to focus on laddering (aka only have free time when you're already tired or something) your rank won't really be a true rank. Without a large enough sample set (aka lots of games) its hard to say where someone really belongs. That's why someone like MC can place into platinum (homestory cup). Obviously for him he can quickly continue to win and reach a higher MMR but he's also a player first. That means he's trained his mechanics as well as his knowledge. Someone in my position has sacrificed part of that. I am not a player first. My knowledge is derived from analyzing a large sample set. Think of it as trading mechanics for broader knowledge.
The other important part of this is the idea that you can't learn without playing. That's not true for this. While it is true that watching NBA games isn't going to make you good at 3 pointers or allow you to dunk it doesn't mean that someone who watches games rather than playing is a bad coach. In fact most nba coaches will just watch games, study players, and can't dunk. Obviously I can elaborate on this but the point is that you don't have to be able to dunk to coach basketball. I'm using my knowledge to help coach, not my mechanics.

2nd analogy: Before anybody becomes a surgeon, they study a long, long time from books. Books that describe where are the organs are and how they function. What medicines affect what. They can tell you where to cut for a surgery but they won't keep your hand steady. I am that book.
You might make arguments like "Well I bet you can't write that book without actually doing a surgery", but that would be wrong. Yes the surgery has to be done but no one surgeon who has spent the time to be the very best (and therefore qualified to write a section) can write the entire book. To write the book you get a writer, you have him take down everything from those qualified experts, and you put it all together. The Top 200 KOTH, GSL, and the countless games I've observed, analyzed and casted, are me (the writer) putting together all the knowledge in one place (my mind/ the book). And thus, despite my lack of ladder games and therefore non gm account, I am still completely qualified to help even the very top echelon of players improve.

So I guess that wasn't as short as I thought it would be but I could certainly explain more.

TL:DR - I've scarified mechanics and ladder time for learning/analyzing time. I learn from watching the best. Someone like day9 still has a very strong understanding of the game even if he doesn't have time to play it at the level of his knowledge. While most sub-gm rated players would not be qualified for this position, most have not spent the time LEARNING the game that I have. Even Code-S players improve by going back and WATCHING their games with help from coaches like Cella (not code S). Obviously they can't JUST watch because SC is not chess it has a physical/mechanics component as well.

^afterthought. Think of it like chess. You don't need to move the pieces to understand/be good. SC is more because its real time and has mechanics, but as I am not a player I don't need mechanics.( you can't really teach speed anyhow...)

Hope that answers your question. I know a lot of other people were probably wondering the same thing. And don't worry it's not insulting to me. There's very little way of you knowing my qualifications unless you've gotten coached by me or have talked to the players I've helped.


although i dont necessarily agree with all your points, you certainly have shown a lot of dedication to the scene and helping others improve. and you have also put a lot of thought into it. i hope the best for you and the team. please keep koth going. its on my second screen while i do other stuff. =)
thundertoss
Profile Joined March 2010
United States1166 Posts
January 18 2012 07:01 GMT
#78
On January 18 2012 15:45 dAPhREAk wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 18 2012 15:33 thundertoss wrote:
On January 18 2012 14:35 dAPhREAk wrote:
On January 18 2012 14:16 thundertoss wrote:
On January 18 2012 13:09 dAPhREAk wrote:
ascend and thundertoss' koth top 200 is awesome.

however, i dont understand why teams are picking up no-name players and making them coaches. this team, and previously team legion with destructive.

what exactly do coaches do that doesnt require them to be extremely good at the game? isnt crazymoving and jecho on a level fifteen floors above thundertoss?


I believe all those things are addressed in the interview. You really should read it. ^_^

i didnt intend for this to be aggressive or insulting (and i did read the interview). what i am wondering is what you have to offer to better players? i looked at your record and i dont even see that you have ever played a 1v1 game on ladder (assuming its you). most people argue that diamond and below (even masters and low gm players) should not be allowed in the strategy section, yet teams are picking up such players as coaches. what gives?

http://www.sc2ranks.com/us/1118450/thundertoss

i have watched koth 200 since it started and i love your contribution to the community, but the recent trend of teams picking up non-1v1 players as coaches is just disturbing to me. teams need to pick up top players as coaches or there will never be any improvement.

as i write this i realize it can easily be taken as insulting, so i will just end with congratulations to you, i am glad at your success and hope you continue with the koth 200, which i love.



+ Show Spoiler +
I'll answer with some quick points since I get it a lot. Obviously it's a valid question since most people think that the only way to learn is to play and hence another reason why there aren't many coaches.

First of all, my understanding is much higher than what my ladder ranking is going to show. That holds true for quiet a few people. Take day9 for instance who has made it known that when he had time to commit to playing he had multiple gm accounts. Now that he doesn't have time to play it would take him a while to get there.
Your ability to play is you matching your mechanics with your game knowledge and decision making. The reflection of that ability is your ladder ranking/ tournament performances. However it is important to note that if you don't have much time to ladder or time to focus on laddering (aka only have free time when you're already tired or something) your rank won't really be a true rank. Without a large enough sample set (aka lots of games) its hard to say where someone really belongs. That's why someone like MC can place into platinum (homestory cup). Obviously for him he can quickly continue to win and reach a higher MMR but he's also a player first. That means he's trained his mechanics as well as his knowledge. Someone in my position has sacrificed part of that. I am not a player first. My knowledge is derived from analyzing a large sample set. Think of it as trading mechanics for broader knowledge.
The other important part of this is the idea that you can't learn without playing. That's not true for this. While it is true that watching NBA games isn't going to make you good at 3 pointers or allow you to dunk it doesn't mean that someone who watches games rather than playing is a bad coach. In fact most nba coaches will just watch games, study players, and can't dunk. Obviously I can elaborate on this but the point is that you don't have to be able to dunk to coach basketball. I'm using my knowledge to help coach, not my mechanics.

2nd analogy: Before anybody becomes a surgeon, they study a long, long time from books. Books that describe where are the organs are and how they function. What medicines affect what. They can tell you where to cut for a surgery but they won't keep your hand steady. I am that book.
You might make arguments like "Well I bet you can't write that book without actually doing a surgery", but that would be wrong. Yes the surgery has to be done but no one surgeon who has spent the time to be the very best (and therefore qualified to write a section) can write the entire book. To write the book you get a writer, you have him take down everything from those qualified experts, and you put it all together. The Top 200 KOTH, GSL, and the countless games I've observed, analyzed and casted, are me (the writer) putting together all the knowledge in one place (my mind/ the book). And thus, despite my lack of ladder games and therefore non gm account, I am still completely qualified to help even the very top echelon of players improve.

So I guess that wasn't as short as I thought it would be but I could certainly explain more.

TL:DR - I've scarified mechanics and ladder time for learning/analyzing time. I learn from watching the best. Someone like day9 still has a very strong understanding of the game even if he doesn't have time to play it at the level of his knowledge. While most sub-gm rated players would not be qualified for this position, most have not spent the time LEARNING the game that I have. Even Code-S players improve by going back and WATCHING their games with help from coaches like Cella (not code S). Obviously they can't JUST watch because SC is not chess it has a physical/mechanics component as well.

^afterthought. Think of it like chess. You don't need to move the pieces to understand/be good. SC is more because its real time and has mechanics, but as I am not a player I don't need mechanics.( you can't really teach speed anyhow...)

Hope that answers your question. I know a lot of other people were probably wondering the same thing. And don't worry it's not insulting to me. There's very little way of you knowing my qualifications unless you've gotten coached by me or have talked to the players I've helped.


although i dont necessarily agree with all your points, you certainly have shown a lot of dedication to the scene and helping others improve. and you have also put a lot of thought into it. i hope the best for you and the team. please keep koth going. its on my second screen while i do other stuff. =)


Well I hope the argument made some sense to you. I appreciate you watching the KOTH. I will keep it going as long as people keep playing it ^_^

ps. Even if you don't agree with all my points the really nice thing is that you don't have to take my word for it. I had multiple teams (and not small time teams, teams with players who will be competing in gsl) offering me a coaching position after hearing from their players how helpful I was at improving their play. You'll also now be able to see my abilities reflected by the improvements of iS players.
Underneath David Kims banelings is another control group of banelings.
NB
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Netherlands12045 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-18 07:16:44
January 18 2012 07:06 GMT
#79
personally i hope you could do a good job once you become a coach simply because you will be the first of this kind and other team will be looking at iS result in order to decided if they really need a coach or not.

I would like to know how are you planning to overcome the skill differences between you and your player in order to gain their respect and listen to you. I have a hard time believe a Korean GM will ever take advice from a diamond 2v2 guy on NA. It is true that you might have casted a lot of games and has been hanging out with a lot of pros in the past but to actually talk to pros about strategy and helping them improve does require a certain level in 1v1 skill. Last time i saw you skype with Col.Minigun while he laddering, you still give him all the wrong suggestion on how to play and after minigun lose you just keep responding 'i dont know i dont know'...

wish you all the best!

edit: correct spellings

edit2: ima leave this related blog of mine here for you to index. note the comments below http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?id=302455
Im daed. Follow me @TL_NB
Akta
Profile Joined February 2011
447 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-18 07:45:23
January 18 2012 07:42 GMT
#80
On January 18 2012 16:06 NB wrote:
personally i hope you could do a good job once you become a coach simply because you will be the first of this kind and other team will be looking at iS result in order to decided if they really need a coach or not.

I would like to know how are you planning to overcome the skill differences between you and your player in order to gain their respect and listen to you. I have a hard time believe a Korean GM will ever take advice from a diamond 2v2 guy on NA. It is true that you might have casted a lot of games and has been hanging out with a lot of pros in the past but to actually talk to pros about strategy and helping them improve does require a certain level in 1v1 skill. Last time i saw you skype with Col.Minigun while he laddering, you still give him all the wrong suggestion on how to play and after minigun lose you just keep responding 'i dont know i dont know'...

wish you all the best!

edit: correct spellings

edit2: ima leave this related blog of mine here for you to index. note the comments below http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?id=302455
There are many ways to earn respect. And being good at making people listen to you is another of the hundreds of things that are more important for a coach than a player. Just like being open to advice is important in all sports for players with access to advice that makes them better.

Speaking in general of course since I don't know anything about thundertoss coaching potential
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
LAN Event
18:00
Day 3: Ursa 2v2, FFA
SteadfastSC430
IndyStarCraft 182
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 522
SteadfastSC 430
White-Ra 235
IndyStarCraft 182
UpATreeSC 134
ProTech123
Railgan 63
ROOTCatZ 45
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 451
Bonyth 78
ivOry 12
Dota 2
Dendi1030
Counter-Strike
pashabiceps1130
Foxcn138
Super Smash Bros
Liquid`Ken5
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu529
Other Games
Beastyqt756
fl0m663
shahzam465
FrodaN395
KnowMe182
Pyrionflax172
ArmadaUGS138
C9.Mang0109
Mew2King88
ToD87
Trikslyr50
OptimusSC21
tarik_tv0
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL164
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 20 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 12
• Reevou 10
• Dystopia_ 3
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2898
• Ler85
League of Legends
• TFBlade969
Other Games
• imaqtpie1345
• WagamamaTV327
• Scarra323
• Shiphtur216
Upcoming Events
OSC
56m
Replay Cast
1h 56m
OSC
14h 56m
LAN Event
17h 56m
Korean StarCraft League
1d 5h
CranKy Ducklings
1d 12h
LAN Event
1d 17h
IPSL
1d 20h
dxtr13 vs OldBoy
Napoleon vs Doodle
BSL 21
1d 22h
Gosudark vs Kyrie
Gypsy vs Sterling
UltrA vs Radley
Dandy vs Ptak
Replay Cast
2 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
2 days
LAN Event
2 days
IPSL
2 days
JDConan vs WIZARD
WolFix vs Cross
BSL 21
2 days
spx vs rasowy
HBO vs KameZerg
Cross vs Razz
dxtr13 vs ZZZero
Replay Cast
3 days
Wardi Open
3 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Kung Fu Cup
5 days
Classic vs Solar
herO vs Cure
Reynor vs GuMiho
ByuN vs ShoWTimE
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Solar vs Zoun
MaxPax vs Bunny
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 21 Points
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025

Upcoming

BSL Season 21
SLON Tour Season 2
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
META Madness #9
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.