| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
phrenetiC
Switzerland224 Posts
What also seems pretty interesting is the removal of 1 mineral patch @crossfire. This basically forces the players to expand quicker and thereby changing the pace of the matches quite a bit on this long narrow map. Also glad they updated CBTS w/ less rocks. I was like "WTF?!" when i spotted the double rockblocked backdoor expansion. :D good stuff! | ||
|
wolfe
United States761 Posts
| ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On October 28 2011 03:55 MooLen wrote: theys really want to see the terrans die. Even if im toss and there way to much Terrans in CodeS, this will just make ZvT pretty much one sided. No reason to attack for the Zerg, no reason to do sth else than react.... Your right we should just let terrans get 4-5 bases. Why attack? lol... If a terran secured a gold base you couldn't attack it anyway so the removal of it doesn't change how zergs can attack or incentive to -_-. | ||
|
NotSorry
United States6722 Posts
| ||
|
FairForever
Canada2392 Posts
Don't like the new map, reminds me of an improved Delta Quadrant (anything that gets compared to that is not good...) | ||
|
LovE-
United States1963 Posts
 | ||
|
NotSorry
United States6722 Posts
| ||
|
Snorkle
United States1648 Posts
edit: also I think calm before the storm could use a little bit wider area around the 4th bases (the ones with the rocks on them) because it looks to me like there is no way a zerg can push a terran third once it has some siege tanks chillin there. | ||
|
Primadog
United States4411 Posts
Does this mean Gold Minerals are officially dead in competitive scenes? | ||
|
TORTOISE
United States515 Posts
| ||
|
ProxyKnoxy
United Kingdom2576 Posts
And please can they change it to a one word name, or two | ||
|
whoopingchow
United States293 Posts
| ||
|
sheeit123
United States10 Posts
On October 28 2011 02:04 fusionsdf wrote: hmm I guess gold patches + mules are being blamed for terran dominance? I feel like it's really how some strategies would revolve around taking the gold especially on dual sight. | ||
|
Dragar
United Kingdom971 Posts
On October 28 2011 02:14 Archvil3 wrote: GOM is taking balance into their own hands. The very open maps which protoss struggle on has been removed or modified while terran favored gold bases are being removed. I'm almost certain we'll see Zerg numbers collapse and Protoss numbers grow with this sort of change, with a magnitude dependant on how big a change they make. I honestly don't see many change made to Terran numbers; a choke helps Terran as much as it helps Protoss, perhaps even more so. | ||
|
knyttym
United States5797 Posts
| ||
|
Dirtysocks
Czech Republic68 Posts
great map for zerg and protoss! | ||
|
Flowjo
United States928 Posts
On October 28 2011 03:08 OMGKEI wrote: Nice I missed those safe natural expansions behind your main. Now expanding in PvP will become a more likely case. I can't believe dual sight is still in the map pool while they removed terminus... You kidding, I hate dual sight too but come on, Terminus was just retarded against Zerg and I'm Terran. | ||
|
Flowjo
United States928 Posts
On October 28 2011 04:03 Primadog wrote: Sad to see no more 3-player maps in the rotation. XnF tends to produce interesting dynamics. Does this mean Gold Minerals are officially dead in competitive scenes? Doubt it, maybe others will follow but no real backlash has occured cause of gold minerals (even though they do favor terran) | ||
|
Bayyne
United States1967 Posts
| ||
|
Gamegene
United States8308 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
The PondCast
Replay Cast
Escore
IntoTheTV X SOOP
Korean StarCraft League
GSL
Replay Cast
Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Weekly
Afreeca Starleague
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
