• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 23:06
CEST 05:06
KST 12:06
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On9Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4)5TL.net Map Contest #21 - Finalists4Team TLMC #5: Vote to Decide Ladder Maps!0[ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt1: Mile High15
Community News
PartinG joins SteamerZone, returns to SC2 competition235.0.15 Balance Patch Notes (Live version)96$2,500 WardiTV TL Map Contest Tournament 151Stellar Fest: StarCraft II returns to Canada11Weekly Cups (Sept 22-28): MaxPax double, Zerg wins, PTR12
StarCraft 2
General
ZvT - Army Composition - Slow Lings + Fast Banes PartinG joins SteamerZone, returns to SC2 competition 5.0.15 Balance Patch Notes (Live version) Stellar Fest: StarCraft II returns to Canada Had to smile :)
Tourneys
Tenacious Turtle Tussle Stellar Fest $2,500 WardiTV TL Map Contest Tournament 15 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament LANified! 37: Groundswell, BYOC LAN, Nov 28-30 2025
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 494 Unstable Environment Mutation # 493 Quick Killers Mutation # 492 Get Out More Mutation # 491 Night Drive
Brood War
General
Question regarding recent ASL Bisu vs Larva game RepMastered™: replay sharing and analyzer site [ASL20] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Holding On BarrackS' ASL S20 Ro.8 Review&Power of Friendship BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL20] Ro8 Day 4 [ASL20] Ro8 Day 3 Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
9 hatch vs 10 hatch vs 12 hatch Current Meta TvZ Theorycraft - Improving on State of the Art I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread ZeroSpace Megathread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Dawn of War IV Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread MLB/Baseball 2023 NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts The Automated Ban List BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final
Blogs
[AI] From Comfort Women to …
Peanutsc
Mental Health In Esports: Wo…
TrAiDoS
Try to reverse getting fired …
Garnet
[ASL20] Players bad at pi…
pullarius1
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1636 users

Should "Deal Making" be illegal? - Page 24

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 22 23 24 25 26 75 Next
Kaitlin
Profile Joined December 2010
United States2958 Posts
September 02 2011 02:31 GMT
#461
On September 02 2011 11:27 StutteR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2011 11:22 Kaitlin wrote:
On September 02 2011 11:21 OlorinTheWise wrote:
On September 02 2011 11:11 Kaitlin wrote:
If players are willing to "make deals", and the winner of the match doesn't matter, as long as they "play their best", what's to stand in the way of earning some side cash by throwing (as a heavily favored player) a match so some gambler and win a bunch of bets and give the player a cut ? If the discrepancy of the prize pool is taken out of the equation, and it's only the "fame" or whatever from winning vs. losing, then why not throw the games for even more cash ?


Because taking money to intentionally lose is match fixing, and you will get your ass banned permanently for doing it. >.>

It's an entirely different animal than splitting the winnings and playing your best game.


Players have been banned from MLG for "deal making".


Pretty sure that was different from what is being talked about. Do you have links/evidence?


Sure do.

http://www.smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=290017

It's not SC2, but it is MLG and I don't think MLG would permit such thing in one game and not another.
MyNameWuzBoB
Profile Joined June 2011
57 Posts
September 02 2011 02:31 GMT
#462
On September 02 2011 11:21 Kaitlin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2011 11:15 MyNameWuzBoB wrote:
On September 02 2011 11:11 Kaitlin wrote:
If players are willing to "make deals", and the winner of the match doesn't matter, as long as they "play their best", what's to stand in the way of earning some side cash by throwing (as a heavily favored player) a match so some gambler and win a bunch of bets and give the player a cut ? If the discrepancy of the prize pool is taken out of the equation, and it's only the "fame" or whatever from winning vs. losing, then why not throw the games for even more cash ?


Can't see too many big gamblers interested in Starcraft, just for the reasons you stated alone. Too prone to rigging.


Don't we have professional gamblers (although I guess poker isn't gambling ? ) playing SC2 professionally, and even posting in this very thread ? Hmm, insider gamblers ... This whole "deal making" idea is looking full of integrity.


What's your point? People want to split their money so what? It's their money to do whatever they want with.
StutteR
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States1903 Posts
September 02 2011 02:31 GMT
#463
Question: How is this different from a Team taking part of a player's winnings and distributing it among the team?
`~` | effOrt Movie sKyHigh forever & SEn
babylon
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
8765 Posts
September 02 2011 02:32 GMT
#464
On September 02 2011 11:30 DarkSkyes wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2011 11:30 babylon wrote:
On September 02 2011 11:24 Medrea wrote:
On September 02 2011 11:22 Kaitlin wrote:
On September 02 2011 11:21 OlorinTheWise wrote:
On September 02 2011 11:11 Kaitlin wrote:
If players are willing to "make deals", and the winner of the match doesn't matter, as long as they "play their best", what's to stand in the way of earning some side cash by throwing (as a heavily favored player) a match so some gambler and win a bunch of bets and give the player a cut ? If the discrepancy of the prize pool is taken out of the equation, and it's only the "fame" or whatever from winning vs. losing, then why not throw the games for even more cash ?


Because taking money to intentionally lose is match fixing, and you will get your ass banned permanently for doing it. >.>

It's an entirely different animal than splitting the winnings and playing your best game.


Players have been banned from MLG for "deal making".


Then I'm following the same line of logic. I'm no longer a fan of pro's who have made deals.

So who has done this? That we know? ToD Grubby TT1?

ToD, Grubby, TT1, Fenix (reneging on the deal doesn't change the fact that he initially made it), and according to Fayth, the teams Reign, EG, mouz, Dignitas, and SlayerS.

Have fun, dude.

You Forgot IM

Only speculation, but it wouldn't surprise me. Fayth didn't mention them, though he's said that he thinks Losira and NesTea must have chopped.

It would be dumb not to split for Blizzcon finals if MVP and NesTea get there, anyways.
CeriseCherries
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
6170 Posts
September 02 2011 02:32 GMT
#465
Mmmm... I guess its not a match fix, but -.- it robs of an important spectator element. Its shortchanges the winner of his glory and his deserved winnings.
Remember, no matter where you go, there you are.
Horse...falcon
Profile Joined December 2010
United States1851 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-02 02:33:39
September 02 2011 02:32 GMT
#466
On September 02 2011 11:31 MyNameWuzBoB wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2011 11:21 Kaitlin wrote:
On September 02 2011 11:15 MyNameWuzBoB wrote:
On September 02 2011 11:11 Kaitlin wrote:
If players are willing to "make deals", and the winner of the match doesn't matter, as long as they "play their best", what's to stand in the way of earning some side cash by throwing (as a heavily favored player) a match so some gambler and win a bunch of bets and give the player a cut ? If the discrepancy of the prize pool is taken out of the equation, and it's only the "fame" or whatever from winning vs. losing, then why not throw the games for even more cash ?


Can't see too many big gamblers interested in Starcraft, just for the reasons you stated alone. Too prone to rigging.


Don't we have professional gamblers (although I guess poker isn't gambling ? ) playing SC2 professionally, and even posting in this very thread ? Hmm, insider gamblers ... This whole "deal making" idea is looking full of integrity.


What's your point? People want to split their money so what? It's their money to do whatever they want with.



The problem is that the spectator/tournament is not getting the same quality product. It cheapens the game and cheats us fans.
Artosis: "From horsssse....falcon"
Xxavi
Profile Joined October 2010
United States1248 Posts
September 02 2011 02:33 GMT
#467
I think it was wrong of TT1 to play the game lightly. I mean, you can have an agreement, and you might have a clear intention of keeping that agreement alive, but that doesn't prevent you from doing your best. Because the money will be shared, it doesn't matter who wins. So then why not make sure the best wins and fans see legit games?

In the end, their plan didn't end up working either. That's a good lesson.
Kaitlin
Profile Joined December 2010
United States2958 Posts
September 02 2011 02:33 GMT
#468
On September 02 2011 11:31 StutteR wrote:
Question: How is this different from a Team taking part of a player's winnings and distributing it among the team?


It's different because that is part of the contract the player agrees to when signing with a team. Has no impact whatsoever on tournament integrity.
ROOTFayth
Profile Joined January 2004
Canada3351 Posts
September 02 2011 02:33 GMT
#469
On September 02 2011 11:29 Pills wrote:
Posted this in the Fenix to IM thread, but decided it was probably more appropriate here:

What Fenix did was a dick move, but I'm kinda happy it worked out like that. If TT1 really did throw away a couple of those games, then he deserved it. Agreements like these completely ruin the spirit of competition, and is a huge middle-finger to the fans that waited to see two deserving players duke it out for all the marbles.

Hopefully in the future, players will learn not to make these underhanded agreements. TT1 got his comeuppance, and it'll be funny to see if Fenix gets a taste of karma in the future.

there's no such thing as "he deserved it" wtf is wrong with you people

if TT1 really did throw the game where he went carriers then it's stupid and annoying for the viewers and his own reputation

what Fenix did is an entirely different matter, he backed out of a deal he agreed to, this is stealing...
JeanLuc
Profile Joined September 2010
Canada377 Posts
September 02 2011 02:34 GMT
#470
I think its perfectly alright for two friends to agree to split their winnings in a tournament they are both participating in. However they should not determine who will win/lose against the other should they meet, that is something entirely different.
If you can't find it within yourself to stand up and tell the truth-- you don't deserve to wear that uniform
Medrea
Profile Joined May 2011
10003 Posts
September 02 2011 02:34 GMT
#471
On September 02 2011 11:30 babylon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2011 11:24 Medrea wrote:
On September 02 2011 11:22 Kaitlin wrote:
On September 02 2011 11:21 OlorinTheWise wrote:
On September 02 2011 11:11 Kaitlin wrote:
If players are willing to "make deals", and the winner of the match doesn't matter, as long as they "play their best", what's to stand in the way of earning some side cash by throwing (as a heavily favored player) a match so some gambler and win a bunch of bets and give the player a cut ? If the discrepancy of the prize pool is taken out of the equation, and it's only the "fame" or whatever from winning vs. losing, then why not throw the games for even more cash ?


Because taking money to intentionally lose is match fixing, and you will get your ass banned permanently for doing it. >.>

It's an entirely different animal than splitting the winnings and playing your best game.


Players have been banned from MLG for "deal making".


Then I'm following the same line of logic. I'm no longer a fan of pro's who have made deals.

So who has done this? That we know? ToD Grubby TT1?

ToD, Grubby, TT1, Fenix (reneging on the deal doesn't change the fact that he initially made it), and according to Fayth, the teams Reign, EG, mouz, Dignitas, and SlayerS.

Have fun, dude.


That is fucking awful. SC2 pro's should feel awful about themselves right now. I bet SlayerS is doing bad in GSTL because they already have there hands in the other teams pockets.

I know Frank and Tranqfx of Reign personally, Im gonna go ask them about this. EG Dignitas and mouz are on my shitlist now.
twitch.tv/medrea
StutteR
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States1903 Posts
September 02 2011 02:34 GMT
#472
On September 02 2011 11:31 Kaitlin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2011 11:27 StutteR wrote:
On September 02 2011 11:22 Kaitlin wrote:
On September 02 2011 11:21 OlorinTheWise wrote:
On September 02 2011 11:11 Kaitlin wrote:
If players are willing to "make deals", and the winner of the match doesn't matter, as long as they "play their best", what's to stand in the way of earning some side cash by throwing (as a heavily favored player) a match so some gambler and win a bunch of bets and give the player a cut ? If the discrepancy of the prize pool is taken out of the equation, and it's only the "fame" or whatever from winning vs. losing, then why not throw the games for even more cash ?


Because taking money to intentionally lose is match fixing, and you will get your ass banned permanently for doing it. >.>

It's an entirely different animal than splitting the winnings and playing your best game.


Players have been banned from MLG for "deal making".


Pretty sure that was different from what is being talked about. Do you have links/evidence?


Sure do.

http://www.smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=290017

It's not SC2, but it is MLG and I don't think MLG would permit such thing in one game and not another.



I think that was in the middle of the tournament. A player didn't like his chances and tried to get a split. I feel like doing it before a tournament is saying, we trained together, we worked together, let's share the rewards together.
`~` | effOrt Movie sKyHigh forever & SEn
Kaitlin
Profile Joined December 2010
United States2958 Posts
September 02 2011 02:34 GMT
#473
On September 02 2011 11:31 MyNameWuzBoB wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2011 11:21 Kaitlin wrote:
On September 02 2011 11:15 MyNameWuzBoB wrote:
On September 02 2011 11:11 Kaitlin wrote:
If players are willing to "make deals", and the winner of the match doesn't matter, as long as they "play their best", what's to stand in the way of earning some side cash by throwing (as a heavily favored player) a match so some gambler and win a bunch of bets and give the player a cut ? If the discrepancy of the prize pool is taken out of the equation, and it's only the "fame" or whatever from winning vs. losing, then why not throw the games for even more cash ?


Can't see too many big gamblers interested in Starcraft, just for the reasons you stated alone. Too prone to rigging.


Don't we have professional gamblers (although I guess poker isn't gambling ? ) playing SC2 professionally, and even posting in this very thread ? Hmm, insider gamblers ... This whole "deal making" idea is looking full of integrity.


What's your point? People want to split their money so what? It's their money to do whatever they want with.


It's not their money. There are conditions that players agree to when entering a tournament. Tread carefully if you choose to violate the conditions the tournament imposes.
roymarthyup
Profile Joined April 2010
1442 Posts
September 02 2011 02:34 GMT
#474
On September 02 2011 11:33 ReignFayth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2011 11:29 Pills wrote:
Posted this in the Fenix to IM thread, but decided it was probably more appropriate here:

What Fenix did was a dick move, but I'm kinda happy it worked out like that. If TT1 really did throw away a couple of those games, then he deserved it. Agreements like these completely ruin the spirit of competition, and is a huge middle-finger to the fans that waited to see two deserving players duke it out for all the marbles.

Hopefully in the future, players will learn not to make these underhanded agreements. TT1 got his comeuppance, and it'll be funny to see if Fenix gets a taste of karma in the future.

there's no such thing as "he deserved it" wtf is wrong with you people

if TT1 really did throw the game where he went carriers then it's stupid and annoying for the viewers and his own reputation

what Fenix did is an entirely different matter, he backed out of a deal he agreed to, this is stealing...



its not stealing, its creative warfare

tt1 should have won if he wanted the money
NTTemplar
Profile Joined August 2011
609 Posts
September 02 2011 02:34 GMT
#475
I feel something important that needs to be said is that pros care more about where they place, than how much they earn.

One doesn't spend that many hours a day out of free will to become among the best in the world on it just for money, there are plenty of other better ways to do that.

You sit down hours with starcraft a day becoming a pro because you love the game, and I think most pros can agree that if they have the minimum of a decent income it is more important how well they do than how much money they get.

If a pro gamer was given the choice of getting 1st place but half the money or 8 place and compared to 1st, twice the money, then I sincerly believe most if not all pro gamers would pick 1st place.

It is fame and glory on the line, not just money. Money is mostly if not always picked when it is necessary, not when it is just "nice to have" or something along those lines.

I also would promote this between teammates of around equal chances to win, helps with keeping the spirit up, to grow a stronger friendship and I believe give better games.

My immediate personal opinion (personal being what I like, not what I logicly think) on the matter of non teammates doing it is, that I dislike it.

Do note all of the above are my opinions (Though I do consider all, apart from those explicitly stated otherwise, to be based on a fairly objective and logical PoV.)

To summarize: I am for it between teammates of about equal chance of winnin; I am unsure, but tilting towards "no" in other scenarios as of now.
"Between Tomorrow's dream and yesterday's regret, is today's opportunity"
ROOTFayth
Profile Joined January 2004
Canada3351 Posts
September 02 2011 02:34 GMT
#476
On September 02 2011 11:30 roymarthyup wrote:
im actually more of a fan of FENIX after hearing what he did


fenix did what needs to be done. if tournaments dont fix dealmaking by changing their rules or how the tournaments are run, then players themselves should use dealmaking to their advantage. fenix told TT1 he would do a deal, then he won the finals because of that advantage, and kept all the money for himself and laughed at TT1


hahahaha. alls fair in love and war boys. kudos to fenix and i support him more as a fan for his brilliant actions.

approving of thievery and being proud of it

what kind of world do we live in -.-
TT1
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
Canada10011 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-02 02:37:42
September 02 2011 02:35 GMT
#477
On September 02 2011 11:02 billyX333 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2011 10:57 DonKey_ wrote:
On September 02 2011 10:55 billyX333 wrote:
On September 02 2011 10:51 Airship wrote:
On September 02 2011 10:50 billyX333 wrote:
On September 02 2011 10:49 Airship wrote:
On September 02 2011 10:47 billyX333 wrote:
I kind of understand the fear that it will hurt the stakes and hype of the tournament finals, but I disagree.

I've got a question for those who are against this, do you think cash prizes would help basketball or football sporting events? I don't think so. Part of the appeal of college sports is that we can be sure most of them are doing it for the passion for competition because they are amateurs who aren't getting paid salaries. I'd get significantly more emotional for the guy who is tearing up on the main stage because he finally gets a major championship title rather than a sick pay check.

Also, from what I understand, players like huk and idra make significantly more money from salaries than they do from tournament winnings. The value of a championship is not in the prize itself but the glory, fame, marketability, and negotiating leverage a player gets for future teams and sponsors. Even if the prize disparity between 1st and 2nd is significantly reduced behind closed doors, the incentive to win is still there. I'd much rather see emotions running high because of the championship title and not the big cash payout.


When TT1 threw his game against Fenix your entire argument was proven invalid and it was proven that it can and has effected play sorry

You didn't understand the argument then sorry


I understand that you think progamers will play their hearts out regardless of money and that TT1 proved you wrong. I am not missing anything.

My primary point is that the incentive to win is there not because of the prizepool. Bringing up a case to the contrary doesn't invalidate any argument. I'm making an argument for what is the case for most progamers.


But he provides evidence for his post, when you present none for your own.

Evidence for my argument? My argument was that the incentive to win is there regardless of prize pool. Why the fuck would anybody compete in MLG. The only players who will on average net a profit from flying across the globe to MLG would be the 4 koreans put in group play. Everyone else is playing for love for the game, competition, or for sponsors.

Just because players like TT1 ignore all incentives except for cash prizes doesn't invalidate any argument. All it does is prove there are idiots out there who don't give a shit about the game or competition. TT1 proved that a long time ago. Thats why TT1 will probably never have fans and that's also why he should go find a new job anyway if all he wants is cash


hahaha i dont care about the competition, thats the only reason why i still play this game
u think naniwa is a hardcore competitor? just because hes been in the spotlight much longer than me that doesnt mean he has more heart/drive than me, u dont know the half it bro

i promise u theres no one in this game that wants to win to more than me, whenever i get knocked out of tournament i dont even stick around in the tournament area because i feel so ashamed of myself, youve never seen me once i get home after one of my failed mlg runs, i get so fucking depressed that i start thinking my future and whether or not im washed up and should quit playing, u dont know wat goes through my head so pls dont act like u do
ab = tl(i) + tl(pc), the grand answer to every tl.net debate
Kaitlin
Profile Joined December 2010
United States2958 Posts
September 02 2011 02:36 GMT
#478
On September 02 2011 11:34 StutteR wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2011 11:31 Kaitlin wrote:
On September 02 2011 11:27 StutteR wrote:
On September 02 2011 11:22 Kaitlin wrote:
On September 02 2011 11:21 OlorinTheWise wrote:
On September 02 2011 11:11 Kaitlin wrote:
If players are willing to "make deals", and the winner of the match doesn't matter, as long as they "play their best", what's to stand in the way of earning some side cash by throwing (as a heavily favored player) a match so some gambler and win a bunch of bets and give the player a cut ? If the discrepancy of the prize pool is taken out of the equation, and it's only the "fame" or whatever from winning vs. losing, then why not throw the games for even more cash ?


Because taking money to intentionally lose is match fixing, and you will get your ass banned permanently for doing it. >.>

It's an entirely different animal than splitting the winnings and playing your best game.


Players have been banned from MLG for "deal making".


Pretty sure that was different from what is being talked about. Do you have links/evidence?


Sure do.

http://www.smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=290017

It's not SC2, but it is MLG and I don't think MLG would permit such thing in one game and not another.



I think that was in the middle of the tournament. A player didn't like his chances and tried to get a split. I feel like doing it before a tournament is saying, we trained together, we worked together, let's share the rewards together.


As long as MLG and their sponsors feel the same as you, then everything is great. They don't, however.
Rylaji
Profile Joined January 2011
Sweden580 Posts
September 02 2011 02:36 GMT
#479
On September 02 2011 11:23 ReignFayth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 02 2011 10:45 puzzl wrote:
TT1: clearly you never even had any intention of winning, since you undeniably threw the game. As far as we know, you intentionally tried to broker a deal that would net you greater overall profit, since you felt you had little chance of beating your (clearly superior) teammate. With this knowledge, you decided to deceitfully pretend like it was fair if you "split the winnings" so you could guarantee your $2500 rather than getting stuck with the $500 you deserved.

It should also be noted that not only was there no guarantee that Fenix would accept the money had you won—many people culturally agree to these situations as a formality with no intention to act on either end—but that we'll never know if you would have even paid out either, especially considering you planned ahead of time to lose on purpose.

I can't believe some people are dumb enough to back fenix in this situation, it's FLAT OUT WRONG

you agreed to a fucking deal, you respect your end of the deal, the deal was: WE SPLIT 50/50 IN THE FINALS

seriously, how is fenix reputation not destroyed right now is beyond me, lots of shady people on TL


Are u retarded? How the fuck does the world work were you live were a person intent of doing something wrong, then backs out and you think it's bad.

If I make a deal with someone to throw a game or fucking kill someone, and I realize no I don't wanna do this. Is that wrong in your book? I need to "keep my word". This ain't the fucking Godfather. Get real son.
Official Fan of; Obama oGs.MC // God of War ST.JulyZerg // d.Naniwa // ST.Squirtle // SlayerS_Alicia // Emperor SlayerS_BoxeR // EG.HuK // White-Ra // MarineKing.Prime.WE // oGs.NaDa's Body // SlayerS.MMA // MvP.DongRaeGu
ROOTFayth
Profile Joined January 2004
Canada3351 Posts
September 02 2011 02:36 GMT
#480
On September 02 2011 11:33 Xxavi wrote:
I think it was wrong of TT1 to play the game lightly. I mean, you can have an agreement, and you might have a clear intention of keeping that agreement alive, but that doesn't prevent you from doing your best. Because the money will be shared, it doesn't matter who wins. So then why not make sure the best wins and fans see legit games?

In the end, their plan didn't end up working either. That's a good lesson.

this is starting to get frustrating lol

their plan didn't work out cuz fenix is a lying greedy bastard
Prev 1 22 23 24 25 26 75 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
BSL Team Wars
19:00
Grand Finals
Team Bonyth vs Team Dewalt
Dewalt vs kogeT
JDConan vs Tarson
RaNgeD vs DragOn
StRyKeR vs Bonyth
Aeternum vs Hejek
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft494
RuFF_SC2 170
StarCraft: Brood War
sorry 84
HiyA 36
Icarus 6
Dota 2
monkeys_forever661
League of Legends
JimRising 608
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K628
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor155
Other Games
summit1g7510
C9.Mang0412
UpATreeSC75
Mew2King50
kaitlyn36
JuggernautJason14
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick850
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• practicex 27
• gosughost_ 13
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift5303
Other Games
• Scarra1354
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
6h 54m
Map Test Tournament
1d 7h
PiGosaur Monday
1d 20h
Map Test Tournament
2 days
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
2 days
The PondCast
3 days
Map Test Tournament
3 days
Map Test Tournament
4 days
OSC
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
4 days
[ Show More ]
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
Map Test Tournament
5 days
OSC
5 days
[BSL 2025] Weekly
5 days
Safe House 2
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Map Test Tournament
6 days
OSC
6 days
IPSL
6 days
dxtr13 vs Napoleon
Doodle vs OldBoy
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL 20 Team Wars
Maestros of the Game
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
Acropolis #4 - TS2
C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
EC S1
ESL Pro League S22
Frag Blocktober 2025
Urban Riga Open #1
FERJEE Rush 2025
Birch Cup 2025
DraculaN #2
LanDaLan #3
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025

Upcoming

SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Revival: Season 3
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
WardiTV TLMC #15
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.