• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 02:27
CEST 08:27
KST 15:27
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915Serral wins Maestros of the Game 244ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3
Community News
New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery!33Weekly Cups (August 17-23): Zerg dominate the week6Weekly Cups (August 10-16): SHIN doubles2GSTL Returns in 2026!45Weekly Cups (Aug 3-9): Protoss get shut out7
StarCraft 2
General
SC4ALL II: SC2 Player Announcement 6/8 - Maru How would you feel about frequent/monthly balance patches for SC2? Weekly Cups (August 17-23): Zerg dominate the week Daily SC2 Player Grid - feedback wanted Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16)
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament 2026 GSTL Announcement IntoTheTV X SOOP SC2 League : Weekly & Monthly PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August) WORTEX 2026 - Hungarian SC2 Finals Budapest
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 540 Dodge This The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 539 Thunder Dome Mutation # 538 Media Blackout
Brood War
General
[Personal Project Share] Terran Defense v0.60 BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL22 General Discussion New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery! Pros React To: Calm's Big Brain Play Vs Mini
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Ro24 Group F BSL LAN Party - Kraków 29-30 August - OPEN SIGNUPS Escore Tournament - Season 3
Strategy
Replay Review Process - What do you do? Game Theory for Starcraft Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread General RTS Discussion Thread Anyone here play Quakeworld back in the day? EVE Corporation
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread The Letting Off Steam Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
Violent Games and Crime Rate…
TrAiDoS
LOCKPICKING NOOB
LUCKY_NOOB
Cathedral Of CS And NY pizza a…
FuDDx
Please support my new stand…
Peanutsc
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 7115 users

PlayXP article on NASL, S2CON situation - Page 6

Forum Index > SC2 General
538 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 8 27 Next All
mcc
Profile Joined October 2010
Czech Republic4646 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-14 14:52:00
August 14 2011 14:49 GMT
#101
On August 14 2011 23:44 zev318 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2011 22:55 mcc wrote:
On August 14 2011 22:48 Myles wrote:
On August 14 2011 22:46 AlBundy wrote:
On August 14 2011 22:39 Myles wrote:
On August 14 2011 22:35 Talin wrote:
To be honest, requiring contracts and deposits just to participate in what's technically an online qualifier tournament (which the whole online portion of NASL is) is just not sensible at all in the first place.


You obviously have no idea how business works. You ALWAYS have contracts. A deal without a contract is no deal at all.

Well maybe in USA but I know a couple of countries where a lot of deals are sealed with a nothing more than a formality.


Really? That's crazy imo. I don't see how you can agree to something and not put it in writing. Don't get me wrong, I understand preliminary agreements and such are often made on a verbal basis, but they're always written into contracts at some point before everything is supposed to happen.

In more than few places oral contracts are as binding as written one, but you need to be able to prove that they actually happened in case of court dispute.


i trust oral contracts as much as leaving a bucket of fried chicken in a room with oprah

If you have the way to prove them and courts enforce them why not ?

EDIT:Not to say that written ones are not better as the crux of the matter is of course proving the oral contract was in fact in place.
Myles
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States5162 Posts
August 14 2011 14:51 GMT
#102
On August 14 2011 23:49 mcc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2011 23:44 zev318 wrote:
On August 14 2011 22:55 mcc wrote:
On August 14 2011 22:48 Myles wrote:
On August 14 2011 22:46 AlBundy wrote:
On August 14 2011 22:39 Myles wrote:
On August 14 2011 22:35 Talin wrote:
To be honest, requiring contracts and deposits just to participate in what's technically an online qualifier tournament (which the whole online portion of NASL is) is just not sensible at all in the first place.


You obviously have no idea how business works. You ALWAYS have contracts. A deal without a contract is no deal at all.

Well maybe in USA but I know a couple of countries where a lot of deals are sealed with a nothing more than a formality.


Really? That's crazy imo. I don't see how you can agree to something and not put it in writing. Don't get me wrong, I understand preliminary agreements and such are often made on a verbal basis, but they're always written into contracts at some point before everything is supposed to happen.

In more than few places oral contracts are as binding as written one, but you need to be able to prove that they actually happened in case of court dispute.


i trust oral contracts as much as leaving a bucket of fried chicken in a room with oprah

If you have the way to prove them and courts enforce them why not ?


If you're going to record all your conversations I guess it works fine.
Moderator
zev318
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada4306 Posts
August 14 2011 14:52 GMT
#103
On August 14 2011 23:51 Myles wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2011 23:49 mcc wrote:
On August 14 2011 23:44 zev318 wrote:
On August 14 2011 22:55 mcc wrote:
On August 14 2011 22:48 Myles wrote:
On August 14 2011 22:46 AlBundy wrote:
On August 14 2011 22:39 Myles wrote:
On August 14 2011 22:35 Talin wrote:
To be honest, requiring contracts and deposits just to participate in what's technically an online qualifier tournament (which the whole online portion of NASL is) is just not sensible at all in the first place.


You obviously have no idea how business works. You ALWAYS have contracts. A deal without a contract is no deal at all.

Well maybe in USA but I know a couple of countries where a lot of deals are sealed with a nothing more than a formality.


Really? That's crazy imo. I don't see how you can agree to something and not put it in writing. Don't get me wrong, I understand preliminary agreements and such are often made on a verbal basis, but they're always written into contracts at some point before everything is supposed to happen.

In more than few places oral contracts are as binding as written one, but you need to be able to prove that they actually happened in case of court dispute.


i trust oral contracts as much as leaving a bucket of fried chicken in a room with oprah

If you have the way to prove them and courts enforce them why not ?


If you're going to record all your conversations I guess it works fine.


duno about u but i always have a voice recorder on me at all times, even when i sleep so if anyone comes in my room and says something, they are legally bound
RoyaleBrainSlug
Profile Joined December 2010
United States295 Posts
August 14 2011 14:53 GMT
#104
Fuck it, I throw my hands up in the air, no more drama... please...
Zileas is my Homeboy
Al Bundy
Profile Joined April 2010
7257 Posts
August 14 2011 14:54 GMT
#105
On August 14 2011 23:46 enecateReAP wrote:
To this critiqing the NASL, I'd like to just remind you that the korean teams JOINED up, they can't just expect everything to be paid for them, thats completely unfair...The people from EU don't get their travel paid for.

The korean teams joined the NASL and then left after the season had started.

The korean teams are the ones being unreasonable.

Wait I thought that the koreans made their move before the deadline. Even if they did it at the last minute, they still made the deadline afaik?!
o choro é livre
Imres
Profile Joined March 2011
515 Posts
August 14 2011 14:55 GMT
#106
On August 14 2011 23:51 Myles wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2011 23:49 mcc wrote:
On August 14 2011 23:44 zev318 wrote:
On August 14 2011 22:55 mcc wrote:
On August 14 2011 22:48 Myles wrote:
On August 14 2011 22:46 AlBundy wrote:
On August 14 2011 22:39 Myles wrote:
On August 14 2011 22:35 Talin wrote:
To be honest, requiring contracts and deposits just to participate in what's technically an online qualifier tournament (which the whole online portion of NASL is) is just not sensible at all in the first place.


You obviously have no idea how business works. You ALWAYS have contracts. A deal without a contract is no deal at all.

Well maybe in USA but I know a couple of countries where a lot of deals are sealed with a nothing more than a formality.


Really? That's crazy imo. I don't see how you can agree to something and not put it in writing. Don't get me wrong, I understand preliminary agreements and such are often made on a verbal basis, but they're always written into contracts at some point before everything is supposed to happen.

In more than few places oral contracts are as binding as written one, but you need to be able to prove that they actually happened in case of court dispute.


i trust oral contracts as much as leaving a bucket of fried chicken in a room with oprah

If you have the way to prove them and courts enforce them why not ?


If you're going to record all your conversations I guess it works fine.


I always forgot that US citizen sign contracts each time they meet someone, oh, wait ...
Myles
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States5162 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-14 14:56:09
August 14 2011 14:55 GMT
#107
On August 14 2011 23:54 AlBundy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2011 23:46 enecateReAP wrote:
To this critiqing the NASL, I'd like to just remind you that the korean teams JOINED up, they can't just expect everything to be paid for them, thats completely unfair...The people from EU don't get their travel paid for.

The korean teams joined the NASL and then left after the season had started.

The korean teams are the ones being unreasonable.

Wait I thought that the koreans made their move before the deadline. Even if they did it at the last minute, they still made the deadline afaik?!


No, the NASL was told the Koreans would not be participating after contracts were signed and games had already been played and recorded(not games by the Koreans I assume).
Moderator
Imres
Profile Joined March 2011
515 Posts
August 14 2011 14:57 GMT
#108
On August 14 2011 23:55 Myles wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2011 23:54 AlBundy wrote:
On August 14 2011 23:46 enecateReAP wrote:
To this critiqing the NASL, I'd like to just remind you that the korean teams JOINED up, they can't just expect everything to be paid for them, thats completely unfair...The people from EU don't get their travel paid for.

The korean teams joined the NASL and then left after the season had started.

The korean teams are the ones being unreasonable.

Wait I thought that the koreans made their move before the deadline. Even if they did it at the last minute, they still made the deadline afaik?!


No, the NASL was told the Koreans would not be participating after contracts were signed and games had already been played and recorded(not games by the Koreans I assume).


No they retract from their contract but they did it at the last minute of the negotiation.
Yamulo
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States2096 Posts
August 14 2011 14:58 GMT
#109
Then why did fxo just leave sc2 con if there "isn't" a problem
~~~Liquid Fighting (SC2)~~~
Myles
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States5162 Posts
August 14 2011 14:59 GMT
#110
On August 14 2011 23:57 Imres wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2011 23:55 Myles wrote:
On August 14 2011 23:54 AlBundy wrote:
On August 14 2011 23:46 enecateReAP wrote:
To this critiqing the NASL, I'd like to just remind you that the korean teams JOINED up, they can't just expect everything to be paid for them, thats completely unfair...The people from EU don't get their travel paid for.

The korean teams joined the NASL and then left after the season had started.

The korean teams are the ones being unreasonable.

Wait I thought that the koreans made their move before the deadline. Even if they did it at the last minute, they still made the deadline afaik?!


No, the NASL was told the Koreans would not be participating after contracts were signed and games had already been played and recorded(not games by the Koreans I assume).


No they retract from their contract but they did it at the last minute of the negotiation.


On August 12 2011 08:06 NASL.tv wrote:
In an effort to try to ease the difficulty of travel, we managed to double our travel budget to $1,000 per player in addition to the minimum prize of $500. Unfortunately, we were notified August 9th (our 2nd day of filming) that this offer was unacceptable, and that Koreans were withdrawing from the league.

Moderator
Azureflames
Profile Joined August 2010
United States35 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-14 15:06:54
August 14 2011 15:05 GMT
#111
On August 14 2011 23:59 Myles wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2011 23:57 Imres wrote:
On August 14 2011 23:55 Myles wrote:
On August 14 2011 23:54 AlBundy wrote:
On August 14 2011 23:46 enecateReAP wrote:
To this critiqing the NASL, I'd like to just remind you that the korean teams JOINED up, they can't just expect everything to be paid for them, thats completely unfair...The people from EU don't get their travel paid for.

The korean teams joined the NASL and then left after the season had started.

The korean teams are the ones being unreasonable.

Wait I thought that the koreans made their move before the deadline. Even if they did it at the last minute, they still made the deadline afaik?!


No, the NASL was told the Koreans would not be participating after contracts were signed and games had already been played and recorded(not games by the Koreans I assume).


No they retract from their contract but they did it at the last minute of the negotiation.


Show nested quote +
On August 12 2011 08:06 NASL.tv wrote:
In an effort to try to ease the difficulty of travel, we managed to double our travel budget to $1,000 per player in addition to the minimum prize of $500. Unfortunately, we were notified August 9th (our 2nd day of filming) that this offer was unacceptable, and that Koreans were withdrawing from the league.



I think this should be posted together.

WeMadeFox contract signed July 25th. Prime contracted signed July 26th. oGs contracts signed July 26th. So from the period in which they were signed (July 25-26), it took TEN days for Mr.Chae (not even a person from SC2Con) to tell me that the Korean players had issues. After I responded, it took another FIVE days (August 9th) for Mr.Chae to notify the NASL that Koreans would not play in Season 2.


On August 12 2011 08:06 NASL.tv wrote:
In an effort to try to ease the difficulty of travel, we managed to double our travel budget to $1,000 per player in addition to the minimum prize of $500. Unfortunately, we were notified August 9th (our 2nd day of filming) that this offer was unacceptable, and that Koreans were withdrawing from the league.
Choboo
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Sweden2088 Posts
August 14 2011 15:09 GMT
#112
Now when every Korean leaves NASL it's a great opportunity for one of them to just participate since they're almost guarantied $20,000 ^_^ Imagine just DRG or someone playing, chances would be slim that he'd drop a single game since Naniwa, Thorzain, Sase and Huk isn't participating either
SaSe fan club manager
legaton
Profile Joined December 2010
France1763 Posts
August 14 2011 15:14 GMT
#113
If you go through my post history, you will see how much i love the korean scene, the korean players and even korean organizations as Kespa, but one thing i noted is how full of shit they can be when it comes down to defend their turf. Their damage control crew is pretty good, but you have to be a little gullible to believe all they say.
No GG, No Skill - Jaedong <3
mcc
Profile Joined October 2010
Czech Republic4646 Posts
August 14 2011 15:14 GMT
#114
On August 14 2011 23:52 zev318 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2011 23:51 Myles wrote:
On August 14 2011 23:49 mcc wrote:
On August 14 2011 23:44 zev318 wrote:
On August 14 2011 22:55 mcc wrote:
On August 14 2011 22:48 Myles wrote:
On August 14 2011 22:46 AlBundy wrote:
On August 14 2011 22:39 Myles wrote:
On August 14 2011 22:35 Talin wrote:
To be honest, requiring contracts and deposits just to participate in what's technically an online qualifier tournament (which the whole online portion of NASL is) is just not sensible at all in the first place.


You obviously have no idea how business works. You ALWAYS have contracts. A deal without a contract is no deal at all.

Well maybe in USA but I know a couple of countries where a lot of deals are sealed with a nothing more than a formality.


Really? That's crazy imo. I don't see how you can agree to something and not put it in writing. Don't get me wrong, I understand preliminary agreements and such are often made on a verbal basis, but they're always written into contracts at some point before everything is supposed to happen.

In more than few places oral contracts are as binding as written one, but you need to be able to prove that they actually happened in case of court dispute.


i trust oral contracts as much as leaving a bucket of fried chicken in a room with oprah

If you have the way to prove them and courts enforce them why not ?


If you're going to record all your conversations I guess it works fine.


duno about u but i always have a voice recorder on me at all times, even when i sleep so if anyone comes in my room and says something, they are legally bound

I really does not work like that and recordings are not required to prove oral contract. Courts are not that stupid and they are not robots and have some discretion. I am no lawyer, but from what I read how it works/worked here some time ago, my impression is that for example : You have two parties and one sold the other something based on oral contract. The second party did not pay. In court if the first party can show that goods were delivered and they have some other evidence of oral contract(witness,request of the buying party to deliver the goods,...) the court might as well decide that the other party has to pay. I have no idea how they determine the amount though. Other real example that I know of is : Parents promised a son that in two years they will write the house on him as the owner. So he made total reconstruction of the house investing a lot and later parents did not actually did as promised. His lawyer told him that it is quite possible to go to court, that witnesses would be good, but even without them there is high possibility that court will decide in his favour as it is clear(he had all the paperwork necessary to prove it) that he invested a lot in that house and it is not feasible he would do so without some kind of compensation. So it would be likely court would at least say that parents have to repay the cost of reconstruction.

Basically the point is, courts are not ( always ) stupid and not everything that appears to be a hole in the law actually is one. Not every small detail of human interactions can be written into the law or into the contract. You often see words like "reasonable", "appropriate" and similar in laws and their interpretation is given by historical usage and by judges thinking about the case and understanding the meaning of the law.
enzym
Profile Joined January 2010
Germany1034 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-14 15:18:14
August 14 2011 15:15 GMT
#115
On August 14 2011 23:37 NHY wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2011 23:24 tdt wrote:
Double speak. sc2CON is an organization founded by the teams. They can claim the teams acted on their own individually all they want, but individuals don't act as a block.


s2con members:
IM, MVP, NSHoSeo, oGs, Prime, StarTale, ZeNEX

Korean teams mentioned in NASL's announcement:
oGs, StarTale, WeMadeFox, TSL, Prime

Korean teams NOT mentioned in NASL's announcement but are not participating in NASL:
SlayerS, FXO Korea

Total of 7 teams withdraw from NASL. Only 3 of them are in S2CON.

I'm not sure what the difference between s2con, sc2Con and SC2 Committee is, if there is any, and where a list of their respective members can be found.

But as far as I'm concerned (and if they are indeed the same group) then your post appears to be incorrect. How else do you explain that TSL had recently been expelled from sc2CON only to see that ban overturned, leaving them as part of that group, and the issue of FXO's recent departure from that group, which has not yet come to a conclusion either?
For both teams to leave this group both teams have to be part of it first. TSL is now part of it again and the issue with FXO isn't finished yet either.

So your list should read
s2con members:
IM, MVP, NSHoSeo, oGs, Prime, StarTale, ZeNEX, TSL, FXO (possibly)

Korean teams mentioned in NASL's announcement:
oGs, StarTale, WeMadeFox, TSL, Prime

Korean teams NOT mentioned in NASL's announcement but are not participating in NASL:
SlayerS, FXO Korea

Total of 7 teams withdraw from NASL. Only 3 5 of them are in S2CON.
"I fart a lot, often on my gf in bed, then we roll around laughing for 5 mins choking in gas." — exog // "…be'master, the art of reflection. If you are not a thinking man, to what purpose are you a man at all?" — S. T. Coleridge
faruq
Profile Joined August 2011
United Arab Emirates116 Posts
August 14 2011 15:17 GMT
#116
in other words sc2con did nothing and got blamed for a crime they didnt commit and the korean teams just did not want to deal with NASL


if NASL was so fucked up after the incontrol fiasco, this will totally make it FUBAR and obliterate it in the entire SC2 map!
Drlemur
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States153 Posts
August 14 2011 15:18 GMT
#117
The NASL thing never made any sense. According to NASL, they were offering the Korean teams way more than most big tournaments and leagues give. If that was the problem, what were the Korean teams demanding? $3,000 travel to the finals only a few players would be going to? Splitting hairs over travel would be stupid and it's generally best not to assume people are stupid (like in SC2, it's a quick way to a loss).

NASL hasn't always given the best impression of professionalism and posting their announcement here blaming "SC2con" and then having to admit later there was no SC2con involvement (just teams & Mr. Chae from the GSL) looks a bit odd. Xeris saying he hasn't been able to get in touch with the team managers is also odd. If you are trying to run a major league, seems like you should be in regular contact with all the team managers by skype/phone (not just email).

I'm going to guess there is something else in the NASL contract that is putting the Korean teams off. Maybe something about contingencies if the league goes bankrupt? Maybe excessive fines for missing matches or disclosing results before broadcast? Refusal to guarantee that the NASL finals won't overlap with a major GSL event or even disrupt sleep schedules prior to GSL matches?

If sC from FXO isn't participating, it isn't about travel support or paying the deposit. They have the sponsorship to cover costs and sC is good enough to win it all. Very odd.

Maybe it's just at trust issue. The players are being asked to make a big commitment to months of play and if they don't trust the organization running the league...
NHY
Profile Joined October 2010
1013 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-14 15:30:23
August 14 2011 15:20 GMT
#118
On August 15 2011 00:15 enzym wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 14 2011 23:37 NHY wrote:
On August 14 2011 23:24 tdt wrote:
Double speak. sc2CON is an organization founded by the teams. They can claim the teams acted on their own individually all they want, but individuals don't act as a block.


s2con members:
IM, MVP, NSHoSeo, oGs, Prime, StarTale, ZeNEX

Korean teams mentioned in NASL's announcement:
oGs, StarTale, WeMadeFox, TSL, Prime

Korean teams NOT mentioned in NASL's announcement but are not participating in NASL:
SlayerS, FXO Korea

Total of 7 teams withdraw from NASL. Only 3 of them are in S2CON.

I'm not sure what the difference between s2con and sc2Con is, if there is any, and where a list of their respective members can be found.
But as far as I'm concerned (and if both are the same group) then your post appears to be incorrect. How else do you explain that TSL had recently been expelled from sc2CON only to see that ban overturned, leaving them as part of that group, and the issue of FXO's recent departure from sc2CON, which awaits conclusion as well?
For both teams to leave this group both teams have to be part of it first. TSL is now part of it again and the issue with FXO isn't finished yet either.

So your list should read
Show nested quote +
s2con members:
IM, MVP, NSHoSeo, oGs, Prime, StarTale, ZeNEX, TSL, FXO (possibly)

Korean teams mentioned in NASL's announcement:
oGs, StarTale, WeMadeFox, TSL, Prime

Korean teams NOT mentioned in NASL's announcement but are not participating in NASL:
SlayerS, FXO Korea

Total of 7 teams withdraw from NASL. Only 3 5 of them are in S2CON.


They are the same. SC2CON is a misspelling.

The list is correct. You can find it at www.s2con.com which is in Korean. Don't be fooled, 'select language' button doesn't do anything.

TSL left S2CON and didn't go back, and have no intention of going back. Confirmed by coach Lee.

FXO is at the moment not part of S2CON. Confirmed by FXOBoss.

Actually, FXO Korea were part of S2CON when other teams decided to withdraw. After NASL's announcement, FXO Korea withdrew from S2CON and NASL (not sure which order).
Al Bundy
Profile Joined April 2010
7257 Posts
August 14 2011 15:21 GMT
#119
On August 15 2011 00:05 Azureflames wrote:
I think this should be posted together.

+ Show Spoiler +
WeMadeFox contract signed July 25th. Prime contracted signed July 26th. oGs contracts signed July 26th. So from the period in which they were signed (July 25-26), it took TEN days for Mr.Chae (not even a person from SC2Con) to tell me that the Korean players had issues. After I responded, it took another FIVE days (August 9th) for Mr.Chae to notify the NASL that Koreans would not play in Season 2.


About the bold part; I wonder why people are upset about this. I mean, maybe the koreans were actually busy trying to come up with a better solution, to find another way to settle this whole issue.
o choro é livre
I_Love_Bacon
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United States5765 Posts
August 14 2011 15:22 GMT
#120
I don't really buy this. The level of miscommunication reads more like people lying originally to save face. It's easier to say you can't do something than you don't want to. I have a hunch various teams or players used the excuse that they were told they couldn't perform, rather than simply tell the truth.

Regardless, everybody has to get their shit together.
" i havent been playin sc2 but i woke up w/ a boner and i really had to pee... and my crisis management and micro was really something to behold. it inspired me to play some games today" -Liquid'Tyler
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 8 27 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
00:00
2026 GSTL: Main Stage Day 3
Discussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
summit1g4858
WinterStarcraft541
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 4212
Leta 137
Pusan 119
910 47
Mind 41
Bale 33
ZergMaN 19
SilentControl 7
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm229
League of Legends
JimRising 800
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox739
Other Games
Coldzera 1071
XaKoH 291
Happy242
KnowMe136
Livibee104
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH157
• practicex 31
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Light_VIP 37
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2139
League of Legends
• Lourlo1354
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Weekly
4h 33m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 3h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 3h
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 9h
GSL
2 days
PiGosaur Cup
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-08-27
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Light Tournament 2026

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL Season 22: Qualifier 2
BSL 2026 LAN: Kraków
RSL Revival: Season 6
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
Esports World Cup 2026: LCQ
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026

Upcoming

CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Escore Tournament S3: King of Kings
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - TRS
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Acropolis #5 - GSA
Acropolis #5 - GSB
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Calamity Invitational
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.