EPTSeason 3 Ladder Map Changes (Official) - Page 40
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
EnSky
Philippines1003 Posts
| ||
|
TUski
United States1258 Posts
 Time to thumbs down Searing caverns for that retarded bunker location, Nerazim for the distances and lack of bases, and BWG! I think I'm gonna love season 3  | ||
|
Pred8oar
Germany281 Posts
Close air could prove problematic for zerg because of the small way behing the gold where you cant surround. And on close ground a forge fe by toss would force an all in bacause you cant take a very fast 3rd that doesnt die to a stargate followup. Antiga Shipyard: Everything else than cross is very vulnerable to drops to your main/3rd with tank support from the other side tt cant say more havent played the map a lot. Nerazim Crypt: A top left and bottom left for example could be hard to defend against a tankpush with elevator drop. Overall a small map. Searing Crater: The 3rd can be harassed by a drop on the cliff, maybe even tanks included. The natural is open to hellions, needs to be walled at the back, a hatch first is needed to have the creep at the small entrance before hellions arrive. Ovreall The 3 bases are very safe, could prove problematic in zvp bacuse toss can turtle hard and can defend multi pronged attacks easily. These are the things i found out after a couple of matches, i am zerg btw. Correct me if i am wrong, but it seems like the naturals are very safe, often a forge fe is possible but the 3rd is very hard to take / vulnerable, so a 2 base all in might be the way to go. Lets see how it works out, but at least Searing Crater will get a veto eventually Shipyard and caverns aswell if i got any vetos left  | ||
|
Evilmystic
Russian Federation266 Posts
| ||
|
emsy
Australia34 Posts
| ||
|
goiflin
Canada1218 Posts
If so, I'm sad ;_; | ||
|
PredY
Czech Republic1731 Posts
no i'm not. i don't see any reason the map should be zerg favored, im open to discussion | ||
|
jjhchsc2
Korea (South)2393 Posts
| ||
|
cilinder007
Slovenia7251 Posts
On July 26 2011 20:21 PredY wrote: no i'm not. i don't see any reason the map should be zerg favored, im open to discussion statistics say so ? | ||
|
ribboo
Sweden1842 Posts
On July 26 2011 19:29 Uncultured wrote: Listen guys. I don't know why I need to point this out, but tournament results are over all patches, and thus are not current. I'm assuming when blizzard says they're using statistics from top play, they mean top CURRENT play. Of which we have no resource to gauge win-rates. Get some current Zv? stats after the fungal buff, and most recent patch change, over a large pool of games, and then we'll have some statistics that matter. TvZ record: 153-173 (46.9%) ZvP record: 129-114 (53.1%) No close position, stats from 23 March, when patch 1.3.0 was released. TLPD is useful. | ||
|
imareaver3
United States906 Posts
Statistics say that Terran has a 65% win-rate on XNC against Z over the past month at the highest levels of play, (for comparison, metalopolis was 56% for Z) but no one is calling for its removal... | ||
|
Zaros
United Kingdom3692 Posts
statistics can be used to prove anything | ||
|
DashFlow
United Kingdom176 Posts
I can't wait for the new maps though! | ||
|
Sapphire.lux
Romania2620 Posts
On July 26 2011 18:23 sixfour wrote: i really don't understand all the qqing about backwater still being there Neither do i  Its not the worst map we've seen by any stretch of the imagination. The map pool looks very good at the moment, IMHO. | ||
|
DerBeefman
Germany226 Posts
| ||
|
PeZuY
935 Posts
| ||
|
Bandeross
Australia4 Posts
| ||
|
Ruscour
5233 Posts
| ||
|
fARLEY
United States45 Posts
User was warned for this post User was warned for this post | ||
|
Lorizean
Germany1330 Posts
Remember Crossfire? Everybody saying this would be sooo bad for Zerg and it turned out to be quite good? (Speaking as a Zerg myself) | ||
| ||
