EPTBlizzard warns HuK/TLO for account sharing - Page 38
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
opticalza
New Zealand188 Posts
| ||
|
The Void
Germany428 Posts
......and nothing more to say. User was warned for this post | ||
|
Casablancas
Denmark145 Posts
On June 25 2011 09:28 Kezzer wrote: This statement couldn't be further from the truth. Many of my friends have watched the pros and stayed active in the scene but didn't even have the game. It was only after months of watching that they decided to get it for themselves. Well, since a couple of people you know have done it I guess it cant be further from the truth. Most people just buy the game and move on. Its only a fraction of SC2 players that know about and follow the pro scene. | ||
|
snotboogie
Australia3550 Posts
-cross region play -LAN | ||
|
sefio
103 Posts
| ||
|
Casablancas
Denmark145 Posts
On June 25 2011 09:32 snotboogie wrote: This nonsense would be a lot more palatable if they actually fixed -cross region play -LAN LAN will never be an option as long as piracy exists. The Cross region server problem is not easily solveable and only annoy a very samll fraction of the playerbase. | ||
|
ltortoise
633 Posts
On June 25 2011 09:33 sefio wrote: I don't get it. Is it against the rules if I go over to a friends house and play a game on his account lol? Technically, yes. But unless you are streaming yourself doing it in front of thousands of people, you unlikely to be caught. | ||
|
redloser
Korea (South)1748 Posts
On June 25 2011 09:32 snotboogie wrote: This nonsense would be a lot more palatable if they actually fixed -cross region play -LAN Yeah, I mean, I can understand why we ordinary gamers cannot use the LAN setting, but they rly should implement some kind of tourny-only LAN package or sth... | ||
|
Boraz
United States361 Posts
| ||
|
The Void
Germany428 Posts
On June 25 2011 09:33 sefio wrote: I don't get it. Is it against the rules if I go over to a friends house and play a game on his account lol? yes it is! [edit]: lol! | ||
|
Casablancas
Denmark145 Posts
On June 25 2011 09:33 sefio wrote: I don't get it. Is it against the rules if I go over to a friends house and play a game on his account lol? If everyone did that, a lot less copies would be sold. Unless of course your just trying the game out and maybe purchasing it later. | ||
|
desRow
Canada2654 Posts
On June 25 2011 01:04 iNcontroL wrote: the issue is that nobody would think twice about huk using TLO's account... nobody at home is going "O M G I just realized I can allow my friend to use my account so he doesn't have to buy one!" But when blizzard calls them up and asks em not to and then threatens action they get a huge PR mess... It's really dumb  well said, what a shit storm User was warned for this post | ||
|
The Void
Germany428 Posts
On June 25 2011 09:35 Casablancas wrote: If everyone did that, a lot less copies would be sold. Unless of course your just trying the game out and maybe purchasing it later. bullshit!!!!!! if a game is good, i will buy it. ps: i havent buy any game except of sc, sc:bw and sc2.... 8[ [edit]: mistake: i ought wc3.... but then i quit playing games for 4 years and restareted playeing sc:bw | ||
|
starcraft911
Korea (South)1263 Posts
It's significant otherwise they wouldn't have circle jerked them in court. | ||
|
Casablancas
Denmark145 Posts
On June 25 2011 09:38 The Void wrote: bullshit!!!!!! if a game is good, i will buy it. ps: i havent buy any game except of sc, sc:bw and sc2.... 8[ So if your friend is tired of the game you dont just play on his account instead of buying your own? | ||
|
manawah
123 Posts
If they doing this with the premise of keeping the integrity of the ladder up to its indented purpose they are clueless as to the amount of hacking going on on their ladder.. | ||
|
radscorpion9
Canada2252 Posts
| ||
|
Casablancas
Denmark145 Posts
On June 25 2011 09:40 manawah wrote: I wish they would apply this type of policing towards more serious EULA infringement like all the map hackers and drop hackers and whatever else these hackers use to cheat with. If they doing this with the premise of keeping the integrity of the ladder up to its indented purpose they are clueless as to the amount of hacking going on on their ladder.. If the hackers were streaming while they played I guess Blizzard would take action too. | ||
|
oBlade
United States5898 Posts
On June 25 2011 09:34 Casablancas wrote: The Cross region server problem is not easily solveable and only annoy a very samll fraction of the playerbase. I would trust R1CH's opinion on that, but I think you're wrong on both points. Everyone wants to play with overseas friends, particularly without spending extra money. It'd be quite easily to just open all the realms, even if ladders were still localized. But the custom games implementation is still clunky, and latency isn't necessarily good. This doesn't mean it wouldn't be easy to open the realms. And those problems have their own solutions, like introducing a second netcode that imitates the p2p connections of BW and infinite other games, over which you also happen to be able to simulate LAN latency. Of course, I suspect this also has some nonsense piracy threat attached to it. So they want everything funneled through big brother Blizzard. | ||
|
StarStruck
25339 Posts
On June 25 2011 09:39 starcraft911 wrote: It's significant otherwise they wouldn't have circle jerked them in court. The only significance of the court case was Blizzard tightening the noose on their IP rights. | ||
| ||
