• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:17
CEST 15:17
KST 22:17
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection7Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview8
Community News
MC vs IdrA, Boxer vs Nal_rA to be Legacy Matches @ BlizzCon145.0.16 Hotfix (June 30) - Balance + Bug Fixes18Weekly Cups (June 22-28): Zergs thrive in new patch2[TLMC] Summer 2026 Ladder Map Rotation05.0.16 patch for SC2 goes live (8 worker start)98
StarCraft 2
General
MC vs IdrA, Boxer vs Nal_rA to be Legacy Matches @ BlizzCon Is the larve respawn broken? ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play 5.0.16 Hotfix (June 30) - Balance + Bug Fixes The Death of Cheese: From a Professional Cheeser
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event Douyu Cup 2026: $20,000 Legends Event (June 26-28) Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule ! INu's Battles#17 <BO.9> Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
New Map Maker - Looking for Advice - Love or Hate Work In Progress Melee Maps [D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 532 Nuclear Family Mutation # 531 Experimental Artillery Mutation # 530 One For All
Brood War
General
ASL 22 Proposed Map Pool ProGamer Paychecks Story BW General Discussion Best thing happen to StarCraft since Remastered? Data needed
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL21] Grand Finals The Casual Games of the Week Thread [BSL22] GosuLeague Casts - Tue & Thu 22:00 CEST
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Creating a full chart of Zerg builds Relatively freeroll strategies Why doesn't anyone use restoration?
Other Games
General Games
ZeroSpace at Steam NextFest - Last free demo Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
[94721]Better Good-Health Signs Than 3-15 Bans/Yea TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Men's Fashion Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
The HerO Fan Club! The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Series you have seen recently... [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [TV/BOOK] *SPOILERS* Game of Thrones Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion McBoner: A hockey love story Cricket [SPORT]
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard? Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Listen To The Coaches!
TrAiDoS
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
I'm an arrogant trash talke…
FlaShFTW
Gauntlet SC2: A Retrospectiv…
Ctone23
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 7377 users

NASL: Koreans? Top Koreans? - Page 79

Forum Index > SC2 General
Post a Reply
Prev 1 77 78 79 80 81 106 Next
Redox
Profile Joined October 2010
Germany24794 Posts
March 16 2011 23:43 GMT
#1561
On March 17 2011 08:39 Kazeyonoma wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 17 2011 08:31 Redox wrote:
On March 17 2011 08:24 adeezy wrote:
On March 17 2011 08:23 Doso wrote:
Imo there shouldn't be any players from Korea in the NASL. They will just dominate the league, also games with them probably have a lot more lag.


This isn't stopping the TSL, and there's no doubt in my mind the TSL will be the best non GSL tournament ever.

TSL will be played on US server. It is impossible to play on Korea server from EU.

WRONG, i asked this directly in the TSL thread, games will be played on the home players server based on seeding, then alternate back and forth.

I think that is true for the NA vs EU or NA vs KOR games. Playing from EU to KOR would make the competition a joke.
Off-season = best season
baoluvboa
Profile Joined December 2010
743 Posts
March 16 2011 23:43 GMT
#1562
On March 17 2011 08:42 nymeria wrote:
anyone know what the korean fansites are saying about this topic?


You can try translated playxp
nvs.
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Canada3609 Posts
March 16 2011 23:43 GMT
#1563
So many fringe NA players arguing against the inclusion of Koreans. -.-
Gofarman
Profile Joined June 2010
Canada648 Posts
March 16 2011 23:44 GMT
#1564
I wish I had a year on TL with this account so that I could report this drivel;

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=201568&currentpage=78#1548

My view on the topic is that we need top caliber players SPEAKING and INTERACTING with other english/german/swedish/french players for our international community to actually progress. Yes, the Koreans are especially dedicated to practice and preparation but don't forget they have access to a wealth of knowledge that semi-pros and pros that don't speak Korean have no way to get, even going to korea.

I stand by any action that will develop Western and European esports if that means a little segregation so be it. (It's not like we are saying they suck and are unworthy to play with us, but some protectionism won the Allies WW2 who says it wont again?)

+ Show Spoiler +
No nukes this time though plzanthx
Redox
Profile Joined October 2010
Germany24794 Posts
March 16 2011 23:44 GMT
#1565
On March 17 2011 08:43 nvs. wrote:
So many fringe NA players arguing against the inclusion of Koreans. -.-

Yeah 1. Soooo many.
Off-season = best season
baoluvboa
Profile Joined December 2010
743 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-16 23:46:40
March 16 2011 23:46 GMT
#1566
On March 17 2011 08:44 Redox wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 17 2011 08:43 nvs. wrote:
So many fringe NA players arguing against the inclusion of Koreans. -.-

Yeah 1. Soooo many.


Blur/Vt/Cloud/Strelok so far are the ones I can recalled.
dkim
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States255 Posts
March 16 2011 23:48 GMT
#1567
On March 17 2011 08:44 Gofarman wrote:
I wish I had a year on TL with this account so that I could report this drivel;

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=201568&currentpage=78#1548

My view on the topic is that we need top caliber players SPEAKING and INTERACTING with other english/german/swedish/french players for our international community to actually progress. Yes, the Koreans are especially dedicated to practice and preparation but don't forget they have access to a wealth of knowledge that semi-pros and pros that don't speak Korean have no way to get, even going to korea.

I stand by any action that will develop Western and European esports if that means a little segregation so be it. (It's not like we are saying they suck and are unworthy to play with us, but some protectionism won the Allies WW2 who says it wont again?)

+ Show Spoiler +
No nukes this time though plzanthx

it really does fit word for word on what cloud was saying. he complains that foreigners will never get to be at the same level as koreans, then he goes off to say that foreigner and korean sc2 scenes have to be segregated. really the same thing if you were following up on cloud's posts.
nvs.
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Canada3609 Posts
March 16 2011 23:48 GMT
#1568
On March 17 2011 08:46 baoluvboa wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 17 2011 08:44 Redox wrote:
On March 17 2011 08:43 nvs. wrote:
So many fringe NA players arguing against the inclusion of Koreans. -.-

Yeah 1. Soooo many.


Blur/Vt/Cloud/Strelok so far are the ones I can recalled.


And Pokebunny
JustPassingBy
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
10776 Posts
March 16 2011 23:49 GMT
#1569
On March 17 2011 08:46 baoluvboa wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 17 2011 08:44 Redox wrote:
On March 17 2011 08:43 nvs. wrote:
So many fringe NA players arguing against the inclusion of Koreans. -.-

Yeah 1. Soooo many.


Blur/Vt/Cloud/Strelok so far are the ones I can recalled.


1. Strelok was talking about the TSL
2. He only complained about the amount of invites. He explicitely stated that he had no problems with:
(a) there being a Korean qualifier to determine the Korean participants
(b) invites for Korean players only
one thing he had a problem with was
- invites going to previous TSL2 champions of SC:BW
- invites going to the teamliquid members in Korea
- invites going to top players in Korea
papaz
Profile Joined December 2009
Sweden4149 Posts
March 16 2011 23:49 GMT
#1570
On March 17 2011 08:38 T0fuuu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 17 2011 08:37 JBrown08 wrote:
You guys are right, top players like MVP would crush the competition and take the tournament easily. You should only invite code A players.

We should invite mvp hes code A.


HAHA, so true and funny :D
Redox
Profile Joined October 2010
Germany24794 Posts
March 16 2011 23:50 GMT
#1571
On March 17 2011 08:46 baoluvboa wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 17 2011 08:44 Redox wrote:
On March 17 2011 08:43 nvs. wrote:
So many fringe NA players arguing against the inclusion of Koreans. -.-

Yeah 1. Soooo many.


Blur/Vt/Cloud/Strelok so far are the ones I can recalled.

Only 2 are NA and Strelok complained more about people being invited at all and especially about the non-Koreans (the TL players) being invited just because they are in Korea. A very valid point imo.

Also no mentions here of the many players that specifically wished for Koreans playing in NASL.
Off-season = best season
nvs.
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Canada3609 Posts
March 16 2011 23:51 GMT
#1572
Quote from ClouD from a recent interview.

ClouD: I am a progamer, that’s my only job in Germany


Of course he wants to make his job easier.
Gentso
Profile Joined July 2010
United States2218 Posts
March 16 2011 23:51 GMT
#1573
On March 17 2011 08:42 nymeria wrote:
anyone know what the korean fansites are saying about this topic?


Interested too. Frankly, I'm embarrassed at the thought of Koreans reading through this thread. : (
jmbthirteen
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
United States10734 Posts
March 16 2011 23:51 GMT
#1574
Yeah cloud is being a hypocrite here because he is complaining on how Koreans aren't involved in our scene, but then says we should continue to segregate the scenes. How about we give them a chance to get into the western scene a bit?
www.superbeerbrothers.com
Gatsbi
Profile Joined April 2010
United States1134 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-16 23:52:39
March 16 2011 23:52 GMT
#1575
This problem would be so easily resolved if they just did top 100 (or 150) players instead of top 50.

Or if they didn't use an invite system at all.

edit: I mean solved as in we could have as many koreans as we wanted if there was 100-150 players.
"IF WHAT YOU DO NOT KNOW IS MORE THAN WHAT YOU HAVE KNOWN. THEN YOU HAVE NOT KNOWN ANYTHINIG YET." - Rev Kojo Smith
EchelonTee
Profile Joined February 2011
United States5261 Posts
March 16 2011 23:52 GMT
#1576
You can't exclude all koreans. Simply unfair; foreign players should step up to take the big cakes otherwise they don't deserve it. As much as entertaining drama and storylines may come more freely from western nations, if those players are not motivated to play better by the threat of more dominant players, skill levels won't rise. How do you guys think Jinro got better? He had to play against the best and win. And besides, many, many koreans have showed openness in dealing with foreigners, as evidenced by the many oGs players and some of the ST ones. I think they would be an entertaning addition, and with the invite system, we could get a balance of top EU, NA, and KR players to duke it out.
aka "neophyte". learn lots. dont judge. laugh for no reason. be nice. seek happiness. -D[9]
Kazang
Profile Joined August 2010
578 Posts
March 16 2011 23:53 GMT
#1577
On March 17 2011 08:26 infinity2k9 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 17 2011 08:24 Kazang wrote:
On March 17 2011 08:14 infinity2k9 wrote:
On March 17 2011 08:07 Kazang wrote:
On March 17 2011 07:10 Liquid`Tyler wrote:
On March 17 2011 06:46 Kazang wrote:
On March 17 2011 04:43 Liquid`Tyler wrote:
On March 17 2011 04:13 Kazang wrote:
On March 17 2011 03:19 Liquid`Tyler wrote:
As long as the KR ladder remains strong, Americans have this opportunity (though Blizzard needs to make it easier for an American to connect to the KR server and get latency like in SC:BW).


Never going to happen.*

The reason for the apparent low latency in BW was because of where the servers were located, or not in the case of direct peer to peer games. You can't specifically choose what server, know where it is or dictate how you play SC2 so you can never get the lowest possible latency. Then of course there is a physical limitation in how fast information can travel over the pacific and back again.

The BW engine is also so terrible that it actually makes high latency less noticeable, it's simplicity Vs stability in netcode. SC2 has much more robust netcode that tries to insure equality and a consistent connection, but increases latency due to the number of loopbacks to the server. SC2 is extremely unlikely to have desync errors and problems of that type, actions not registering etc, but that stability comes at the cost of more noticeable lag when the latency does increase.


*if it ever does it will be at the same time they implement LAN play.

This sucks because SC2 seems to be worse in every way compared to SC1. For example, if I'm playing on KR server, and if my opponent and I give a command simultaneously, his command happens first. In this way, our games are out of sync. We do things at different times depending on our latency to the server. This isn't the case with SC1. Commands given simultaneously in the real world happen simultaneously in the game. Also in SC2, it's possible for the game to momentarily freeze and then skip ahead for one player, but for the other player to have a smooth experience the whole time.

It's just really disappointing because SC:BW was designed mainly for dial-up modems. As connections improved, Blizzard did nothing, but fans were able to make adjustments to take advantage of our internet connections. And then SC2 comes out and I'm thinking it'll be nice to not have to use third party programs anymore. But then they totally sacrificed the quality of long distance connections, which kinda blew my mind with how much PR they had about building SC2 for esports. NA to NA and EU to EU and KR to KR all provide excellent online experiences but they must have known that SC2 as an esport would require good connections cross continent =[[[


Well here is the rub.

SC1/BW used a different type of netcode. Basically when you issue a command, the unit does it on your client then it sends what that unit did to the server, server then sends it to the other player.
Yes your actions have instant effect on your screen, but your opponent doesn't see your action until the 200+ ms later. This is better in a perfect environment, with 0 latency, and can even appear fine in high latency, but the reality is there is a difference in sync.
You have the illusion of zero latency, but behind the scenes that is not the case.

This is just factually wrong. Did you even play SC1 online? I don't know why I should read the rest of your post after you've written this.

Maybe I should clarify about what I mean by "Commands given simultaneously in the real world happen simultaneously in the game"
I give a command simultaneously with my opponent in the real world
there is a delay
The commands happen simultaneously in the game

Our commands are simultaneous with each other. The giving of the command doesn't happen simultaneously with the game performing the command.


There is a forced delay in SC1 to make up for differences in latency, that is separate to how it relates to actual latency, that is not exactly a good solution either. It just forces a delay on the player with the better latency, to give the approximate effect of doing things at the same moment. The player with the lower latency still has the reaction advantage, although less pronounced, that just physically how it works, there is a latency in the signal going a long way, you cannot get around that only try to compensate for it.

That's worse than it is with how it works in SC2. If someone on a server is lagging it still effects all the players on the server in SC2. That's most evident in games with lot's of spectators, one person lagging causes the whole game to slow down and/or stutter.

If your complaint is that the lag isn't equal then you are over estimating how much of a disadvantage one player is at if they play at a higher latency.
It's bad for both, slightly worse for one. It attempts to meet in the middle, which as I explained before works best when both players are playing on normal latency.

It doesn't change the fact that there is lag when playing long distance, it's just how it is. Asking blizzard to somehow change the laws of physics to make distance irrelevant just because it's supposed to be an esport is totally unreasonable.


I dunno why you're still posting about this, but you are completely wrong. In BW lag affects all players as well, thats why if a spectator is lagging you kick them out. You have not even played it have you? There is NO reaction advantage.

BW
Player -> Player

SC2
Player -> Server -> Player

Everyones experience points to the first as working fine and better, especially when we have control over the latency with ICCUP. SC2's method is not better other than it stops people pirating the game which is not better for us it's better for Blizzard. I don't have any idea where you got your ideas about the BW netcode from.


Did you even read my post?

Because you clearly did not understand any of it.


Its you making up shit about BW that isn't true. I understood it perfectly but what you are saying is completely wrong. Again just so you try to get it: BW has no reaction advantage, and every player in the game suffers lag if one player does, ok?


Try going back and reading exactly what I wrote, it's unedited.

Here I will paste it for you:
"There is a forced delay in SC1 to make up for differences in latency, that is separate to how it relates to actual latency, that is not exactly a good solution either. It just forces a delay on the player with the better latency, to give the approximate effect of doing things at the same moment."

The effect in SC2 is roughly the same, if one player lags all the players will lag to some extent. The way it handles this is better, and more complex, than putting a huge delay on the player with the better latency.

The fact is still the same, long distances mean high latency and lag.
BW or SC2, playing across long distances results in Lag it's a fact of the damn universe.
SC2 really does do a better job of minimizing the effects of lag when it's played as intended, within the same region. It's gets worse when the latency gets above "normal" levels, they cannot make it better at long distance. It's as good as it's going to get.

We have to make the best of what the game is. If you want to run an online tournament across multiple regions, it's going to have lag.
If NASL has players from NA/EU/Korea playing each other, it's going to be laggy for all of them. It's physically impossible to not have lag.
aTnClouD
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
Italy2428 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-16 23:57:29
March 16 2011 23:53 GMT
#1578
On March 17 2011 08:48 dkim wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 17 2011 08:44 Gofarman wrote:
I wish I had a year on TL with this account so that I could report this drivel;

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=201568&currentpage=78#1548

My view on the topic is that we need top caliber players SPEAKING and INTERACTING with other english/german/swedish/french players for our international community to actually progress. Yes, the Koreans are especially dedicated to practice and preparation but don't forget they have access to a wealth of knowledge that semi-pros and pros that don't speak Korean have no way to get, even going to korea.

I stand by any action that will develop Western and European esports if that means a little segregation so be it. (It's not like we are saying they suck and are unworthy to play with us, but some protectionism won the Allies WW2 who says it wont again?)

+ Show Spoiler +
No nukes this time though plzanthx

it really does fit word for word on what cloud was saying. he complains that foreigners will never get to be at the same level as koreans, then he goes off to say that foreigner and korean sc2 scenes have to be segregated. really the same thing if you were following up on cloud's posts.

First I don't complain, I am stating a truth that got just proven by the last big event where we had the very top european/american players and some korean low level pros. I also didn't say they have to be segregated, I am just saying korean esport has always been an elitist community with no real possibility to interact since a decade ago. I don't know what's good or what's better but the moment you allow all top koreans then it's just them, and I don't think western progamers are willing to move to korea and play months there just to get invited to NASL.
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g64/hunter692007/kruemelmonsteryn0.gif
sheaRZerg
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United States613 Posts
March 16 2011 23:54 GMT
#1579
1v1 MOTW NO KR!!!1!

But seriously. I think completely opening big tournaments to Koreans would do a lot of good. It would certainly draw a lot of interest to tournaments. Especially having the big names like Boxer, Nada etc, might help in drawing enough attention to keep a strong foreign scene going. Otherwise I feel it will quickly devolve into the BW system, where korea holds all the big tournaments with a handful of the top foreigners trying to break in. I think it will also draw much more attention from viewers korea, which honestly can't be a bad thing for creating a sustainable eSports scene.
"Dude, just don't listen to what I say; listen to what I mean." -Sean Plott
KoshkaTV
Profile Joined October 2010
United States430 Posts
March 16 2011 23:56 GMT
#1580
On March 17 2011 08:24 adeezy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 17 2011 08:23 Doso wrote:
Imo there shouldn't be any players from Korea in the NASL. They will just dominate the league, also games with them probably have a lot more lag.


This isn't stopping the TSL, and there's no doubt in my mind the TSL will be the best non GSL tournament ever.


For sure... because they got all the best players. Whoever wins the TSL, can claim to be the best player in the world (for that moment).... well unless July wins the GSL.

But ya.. if you beat the best in a LAN tourney.. you're the best! The winner of NASL should be the best player in the world!
www.KoshkaTV.com
Prev 1 77 78 79 80 81 106 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Kung Fu Cup
11:00
KungFu Cup 2026 Week 13
IntoTheiNu 1228
WardiTV672
RotterdaM636
TKL 250
SteadfastSC89
CranKy Ducklings43
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 636
TKL 250
Ryung 219
elazer 164
SHIN 150
ProTech111
SteadfastSC 89
IndyStarCraft 85
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 58088
Sea 2883
Shuttle 1551
Horang2 1146
EffOrt 686
firebathero 585
Light 581
Hyuk 464
Zeus 401
BeSt 340
[ Show more ]
Soma 327
Mini 260
Soulkey 206
Snow 203
Rush 202
hero 186
ggaemo 184
Last 178
Pusan 103
Hyun 96
Dewaltoss 78
ZerO 51
Aegong 43
ToSsGirL 42
Free 33
scan(afreeca) 28
sorry 25
[sc1f]eonzerg 24
Icarus 22
Shine 20
Barracks 15
Bale 15
Sacsri 11
zelot 9
Dota 2
Gorgc2200
singsing2024
Dendi967
XaKoH 564
Fuzer 421
XcaliburYe14
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1689
kRYSTAL_23
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King64
Other Games
B2W.Neo875
hiko665
Lowko396
crisheroes326
DeMusliM270
Pyrionflax199
Hui .194
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream188
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 30
lovetv 16
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• EnkiAlexander 20
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP8
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis2397
• TFBlade359
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
10h 43m
CrankTV Team League
21h 43m
Bombastic Starleague
1d 6h
The PondCast
1d 20h
HomeStory Cup
1d 21h
Replay Cast
2 days
HomeStory Cup
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
HomeStory Cup
3 days
OSC
3 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
WardiTV Weekly
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

YSL S3
Douyu Cup 2026
Murky Cup 2026

Ongoing

IPSL Spring 2026
Acropolis #4
CSL Season 21: Qualifier 2
SCTL 2026 Spring
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026

Upcoming

CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
ASL Season 22:Wild Card Qualifier
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
HSC XXIX
Light Tournament 2026
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale
Heroes Pulsing #3
Eternal Conflict S2 E1
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.